1995 Nash Stream Forest Management Plan

Total Page:16

File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

1995 Nash Stream Forest Management Plan Nash Stream Forest MANAGEMENT PLAN State of New Hampshire Department of Resources and Economic Development 1995 050 Nash Stream Forest FOREWORD The Nash Stream Forest is a unique parcel of land in Northern New Hampshire. Its acquisi- tion in 1988, through a collaborative effort between the state of New Hampshire Land Conservation Investment Program, the U.S. Forest Service, The Nature Conservancy, The Trust for New Hampshire Lands, and The Society for the Protection of New Hampshire Forests is equally unique, and serves as a milestone in state, private and federal cooperation. The diversity of the groups represented in this effort is almost as great as the diversity of resources that exists within the Nash Stream Forest and the topography of the land itself. Yet over an eighteen-month period, representatives from each of these groups worked together, to negotiate an arrangement which all felt was in the best interest of the land and the people who use it. All of the groups involved in the purchase and future management of the Nash Stream Forest recognized the importance of protecting the Forest from development, as well as the importance of continuing to use the land in a "multiple-use" manner—for education and research, as a key watershed area, for fish and wildlife, recreation, scenic qualities, and as a sustainable timber resource. These mutual concerns led to the successful purchase of the property, the formation of a Technical Team to assist in the development of a management plan, and to a gubernatorial-appointed Advisory Committee to focus public input and pro- vide insightful advice (see page 9). The Nash Stream Advisory Committee determined that the Nash Stream Management Plan serve as a model of public land stewardship realizing that the funding necessary to fully implement the Plan is not presently available in state government. Therefore, the Committee recommended that the Plan be implemented, to the extent possible, in order to achieve the Forest condition described in the Vision (see page 61) as soon as possible. The Plan identifies more than 60 implementation requirements that range from basic boundary line and road maintenance to specially designed studies and scientific monitor- ing. These requirements will provide the basis for work plans to be carried out within the limits of available resources. The Department of Resources and Economic Development and the Division of Forests and Lands is extremely grateful to the members of the Advisory Committee and Technical Team who collectively donated more than 1000 hours of time to this project. Without their dedica- tion and interest this state-of-the-art plan would never have been completed. John E. Sargent NH State Forester c Nash Stream Forest TABLE OF CONTENTS FOREWORD HIGHLIGHTS 1 1. THE HASH STREAM FOREST 1 Introduction History/Acquisition 3 Why the State Purchased the Nash Stream Forest 4 Conservation Easement 5 General Provisions 5 Uses Allowed, Not Allowed 7 Timber Management Constraints 7 Role of State and Federal Governments 8 Laws Affecting the Nash Stream Forest 8 Chronology/Planning Process 9 Work Plan 11 12 2. THE RESOURCE HISTORY OF THE NASH STREAM Soil and Vegetation 12 Soil Development 12 Vegetation 12 Cultural 13 Land Use and Ownership 14 Forest Protection 14 Forest Fire Protection 14 Insect and Disease 14 Law Enforcement 14 Logging 15 Recreation 17 Hiking 17 Fishing, Hunting and Trapping 18 Snowmobiling 18 Camping and Camp Lot Leases 18 Fisheries 18 Wildlife 20 (continued on next page) 050 Nash Stream Forest 3. INVENTORY AND SITUATION 21 Reserved Rights 21 Power Line Easement—Public Service Company of New Hampshire 21 Canadian National Railroad 21 Public Highways 21 Miscellaneous Reservations 21 Gravel 21 Camp Lot Leases 22 Recreation Camp Lots 22 Roads and Access 23 Timber Resources 25 Forest Composition 26 Forest Structure 26 Seedling and Sapling Size Classes 26 Poletimber Size Class 27 Sawtimber Size Class 27 Timber Volume and Quality 27 Growth and Stocking 28 Areas of Ecological Concern 29 Water Resources 31 Fisheries Resources 31 Ponds 31 Streams 33 Wildlife Habitats and Species 34 Ponds, Streams, and Wetlands 34 Upland Forest 35 Other Habitat Features 38 Wildlife Present 39 Threatened and Endangered Species and Other Species of Management Concern 41 Species of Management Concern 42 Neotropical Migrants 47 Implications of Present Stand Composition and Age Structure 47 Recreation Resources 49 Snowmobiling 49 Hiking 50 Other Trail Uses 50 Hunting and Fishing 50 Recreation Access 50 (continued on next page) c Nash Stream Forest 51 Soils, Landscapes and Ecological Land Groups 55 Cultural Resources 55 Forest Protection Resources 55 Forest Fire Prevention 55 Presuppression 56 Detection 56 Suppression 58 Insect and Disease 58 Law Enforcement Economic Considerations 58 State and Federal Land Reimbursements 58 Forest Fire Suppression, Training and Prevention 59 Timber Harvests and Yield Taxes 59 OHRV Grant-in-Aid Program 60 Private Camp Lot Licenses 60 U.S. Forest Service Grants 60 61 4. THE MANAGEMENT VISION Management Vision 61 Management Principles 61 Goals of Management 62 Timber 62 Natural Areas 63 Recreation 63 Fish and Wildlife 64 Public Participation 64 Monitoring, Research and Interpretation 64 5. MANAGEMENT DIRECTION 65 Goals, Objectives and Strategies 65 Stewardship 65 Public Involvement 67 Cultural Resources 68 Recreation Resources 68 Areas of Ecological Significance 70 Wildlife Resources 70 Fisheries Resources 71 Timber Resources 72 Fisheries Management 75 Native vs. Wild Trout 75 Pond Management 75 Stream Management 76 (continued on next page) 050 Nash Stream Forest Management of Areas of Ecological Concern 76 Natural Preserves 77 Control Areas 78 Buffer Areas and Corridors 80 Other Protected Areas 81 Recreation Management. 81 Recreation Management Guidelines 82 Trails 82 Hiking 83 Snowmobiling 83 Other Trail Uses 84 Visual Quality 84 Recreation Access 84 Camping and Non-traditional Recreation 84 Education and Interpretation 85 Volunteerism 85 Nash Bog Dam 85 Wildlife Management 86 Habitat Protection and Management 87 Public Use of Wildlife 89 Population Assessment and Monitoring 90 Wildlife Reintroduction 91 Forest Protection Management 91 Prevention 91 Presuppression 92 Detection 93 Suppression 93 Insect and Disease 94 Law Enforcement 94 Boundary Maintenance 95 Procedure and Schedule 96 Cultural Resources Management 96 Timber Management 96 Conservation Easement and Timber Management 98 No Harvest Areas 98 Restrictions on Clearcutting and Logging Near Streams 99 Sustained Yield Management 99 Available Forest Land 100 Areas Suitable for Timber Management 100 Ecological Land Capabilities 100 Species Composition and Distribution 100 (continued on next page) 050 Nash Stream Forest 103 Soil/Site Capabilities and Target Ages 104 Forest Structure Trend Stand Management and Natural Regeneration Patterns 104 105 Silvicultural Practices Water Quality and Timber Harvesting 105 Visual Quality and Timber Harvesting 106 Cooperative Management and Resource Integration 106 Cooperative Land Management Committee 106 State Land Management Team 109 Citizen Advisory Committee 110 Camp Lot License Management 110 Private Camp Termination 111 License Considerations 111 Acquisition of In-holdings and Outstanding Rights 112 Roads and Access Management 112 Vehicle Access and Gates 112 Maintenance 113 Gravel Use Policy 113 Management Guidelines 113 A. Cooperative Management 113 B. Cultural Resources 114 C. Pest Management 114 D. Recreation 115 E. Roads and Access 116 F. Natural Preserves 117 G. Timber 118 H. Threatened and Endangered Species 121 I. Riparian Zones 121 J. Wildlife 123 K. Fish 126 L. Fire 127 M. Lands 127 N. Law Enforcement 128 Public Use Guidelines 128 A. General 128 B. Research and Special Uses 129 C. Minerals 129 Monitoring and Evaluation 130 A Complete Monitoring Program 130 (continued on next page) cb Nash Stream Forest 6. GLOSSARY/FOOTNOTES/REFERENCES/ACKNOWLEDGMENTS 136 Glossary 136 Footnotes 149 References 151 Acknowledgments 154 7. APPENDIX 155 1 Newspaper Clippings 155 2 Group Summaries 157 3 Summary of Common Themes 159 4 Private Camp Lot License Policy 161 5 Road List By Class 163 6 Important Forest Soil Groups/Soil Units and Ecological Land Groups 165 7 Available Forest Land and Other Categories 172 8 Ecological Land Group Descriptions 174 9 Community Forest Fire Resources 177 10 Management and Protection Laws 181 050 Nash Stream Forest STATE OF NET HAMPSHIRE DEPARTMENT OF ROME AND ECONOMIC DEVELOPMENT CANADA NASH STREAM FOREST: LOCATION MAP ititi: Fe crib". COMITY: C.., toasty ICUS: 71,111 Del: ipril 1103 MITI 30(11C13: CollsOld iy VI loparlayyt 0 vault., U3 virtu servie;, /!;:iii: 11:iliirTiell.:1'12 if irrilig,IiijilijiiInsil C.., IT: IIILTIls 1:711:tiiiIrtbiertriiboi'lliti, ::.1., :cfrpiles, us v rsity 0 MAP SCALE' 111.250.000 MASSACHUSET TS c Nash Stream Forest READER'S NOTE: To help readerS:payi ate through this hefty document, a detailed Table of on en the following Hi ights section are provided. A companion document, NashS4 News, which answers commonly asked questions is also available upon reque If you have comments or questions, or would like a copy of the Nash Stream 1.4 please. call the' of Forests and Lands in Concord, NH at (603)271-3456, o write to: Department of 1 00 ArrN: Nash StiiVam Forest Box 1856 Concord, NT-I
Recommended publications
  • Official List of Public Waters
    Official List of Public Waters New Hampshire Department of Environmental Services Water Division Dam Bureau 29 Hazen Drive PO Box 95 Concord, NH 03302-0095 (603) 271-3406 https://www.des.nh.gov NH Official List of Public Waters Revision Date October 9, 2020 Robert R. Scott, Commissioner Thomas E. O’Donovan, Division Director OFFICIAL LIST OF PUBLIC WATERS Published Pursuant to RSA 271:20 II (effective June 26, 1990) IMPORTANT NOTE: Do not use this list for determining water bodies that are subject to the Comprehensive Shoreland Protection Act (CSPA). The CSPA list is available on the NHDES website. Public waters in New Hampshire are prescribed by common law as great ponds (natural waterbodies of 10 acres or more in size), public rivers and streams, and tidal waters. These common law public waters are held by the State in trust for the people of New Hampshire. The State holds the land underlying great ponds and tidal waters (including tidal rivers) in trust for the people of New Hampshire. Generally, but with some exceptions, private property owners hold title to the land underlying freshwater rivers and streams, and the State has an easement over this land for public purposes. Several New Hampshire statutes further define public waters as including artificial impoundments 10 acres or more in size, solely for the purpose of applying specific statutes. Most artificial impoundments were created by the construction of a dam, but some were created by actions such as dredging or as a result of urbanization (usually due to the effect of road crossings obstructing flow and increased runoff from the surrounding area).
    [Show full text]
  • New Hampshire River Protection and Energy Development Project Final
    ..... ~ • ••. "'-" .... - , ... =-· : ·: .• .,,./.. ,.• •.... · .. ~=·: ·~ ·:·r:. · · :_ J · :- .. · .... - • N:·E·. ·w··. .· H: ·AM·.-·. "p• . ·s;. ~:H·1· ··RE.;·.· . ·,;<::)::_) •, ·~•.'.'."'~._;...... · ..., ' ...· . , ·....... ' · .. , -. ' .., .- .. ·.~ ···•: ':.,.." ·~,.· 1:·:,//:,:: ,::, ·: :;,:. .:. /~-':. ·,_. •-': }·; >: .. :. ' ::,· ;(:·:· '5: ,:: ·>"·.:'. :- .·.. :.. ·.·.···.•. '.1.. ·.•·.·. ·.··.:.:._.._ ·..:· _, .... · -RIVER~-PR.OT-E,CT.10-N--AND . ·,,:·_.. ·•.,·• -~-.-.. :. ·. .. :: :·: .. _.. .· ·<··~-,: :-:··•:;·: ::··· ._ _;· , . ·ENER(3Y~EVELOP~.ENT.PROJ~~T. 1 .. .. .. .. i 1·· . ·. _:_. ~- FINAL REPORT··. .. : .. \j . :.> ·;' .'·' ··.·.· ·/··,. /-. '.'_\:: ..:· ..:"i•;. ·.. :-·: :···0:. ·;, - ·:··•,. ·/\·· :" ::;:·.-:'. J .. ;, . · · .. · · . ·: . Prepared by ~ . · . .-~- '·· )/i<·.(:'. '.·}, •.. --··.<. :{ .--. :o_:··.:"' .\.• .-:;: ,· :;:· ·_.:; ·< ·.<. (i'·. ;.: \ i:) ·::' .::··::i.:•.>\ I ··· ·. ··: · ..:_ · · New England ·Rtvers Center · ·. ··· r "., .f.·. ~ ..... .. ' . ~ "' .. ,:·1· ,; : ._.i ..... ... ; . .. ~- .. ·· .. -,• ~- • . .. r·· . , . : . L L 'I L t. ': ... r ........ ·.· . ---- - ,, ·· ·.·NE New England Rivers Center · !RC 3Jo,Shet ·Boston.Massachusetts 02108 - 117. 742-4134 NEW HAMPSHIRE RIVER PRO'l'ECTION J\ND ENERGY !)EVELOPMENT PBOJECT . -· . .. .. .. .. ., ,· . ' ··- .. ... : . •• ••• \ ·* ... ' ,· FINAL. REPORT February 22, 1983 New·England.Rivers Center Staff: 'l'bomas B. Arnold Drew o·. Parkin f . ..... - - . • I -1- . TABLE OF CONTENTS. ADVISORY COMMITTEE MEMBERS . ~ . • • . .. • .ii EXECUTIVE
    [Show full text]
  • Land Protection Plan
    Appendix A Ian Drew/USFWS View of upland forest on the refuge Land Protection Plan Land Protection Plan Land Protection Plan I. Introduction We propose to expand the land acquisition boundary of the Lake Umbagog National Wildlife Refuge by 49,718 acres. We also recognize the importance of communicating our interest in acquiring and conserving that land to our partners in conservation, the local community, and the public. This land protection plan (LPP) explains our interests and intentions to owners of land near the refuge, to state agencies in New Hampshire and Maine, our conservation partners, local communities and the public. It also presents methods the Service and landowners interested in selling their land can use in accomplishing the wildlife habitat objectives of alternative B, our preferred alternative in the draft comprehensive conservation plan (CCP) and environmental impact statement (EIS) for the refuge. We developed this LPP at the same time and in conformance with that draft CCP and EIS. We believe our acquisition of additional land in fee title and conservation easements will contribute significantly to the conservation of federal trust resources in the Upper Androscoggin River watershed. The purposes of this LPP are � to inform landowners of our long-standing policy of acquiring land only from willing sellers. If an owner is not interested in selling, we will not purchase that land or an easement on it. � to inform the public clearly and concisely about resource protection needs, our priorities and policies for protecting land, the extent of our proposal, and potential conservation methods; � to describe the impacts of our proposal; and � to describe our intentions for managing the land we acquire.
    [Show full text]
  • Natural Resources
    Ver 8/5/2013 CHAPTER 8: NATURAL RESOURCES Photo: Kamal Nath 76 Ver 8/5/2013 8.1. Introduction Effingham Conservation Commission (ECC) assembled a Natural Resources Inventory in 2007. At its simplest, a Natural Resources Inventory (NRI) is an identification, description and compilation of a given Town’s Natural Resources based on maps and scientific data. Chapter 8 of this Master Plan is based on the 2007 NRI. The entire NRI is available in the appendix of this document. The primary focus of the Natural Resources chapter is to identify the natural resources in the town of Effingham, recognize the role these resources play in giving the Town its character and decide what strategies would best maintain this character (see Section 8.9 titled Natural Resource Goals). All of the community’s resources are interconnected and any change to one can have a significant impact on the others. As the population increases, demands on many of these resources will increase, possibly to the point of threatening the quality and quantity of the resource. The goal of this Natural Resources Inventory is to help develop a balance between development and resource protection within Effingham that will guide future sustainable development of the community. Below is a summary of a few features of the natural resources in Effingham. Table 1: Effingham Land and Water Distribution Type Acres Total Town Area 25,555.9 (39.9 sq. mi.) Total Land Area 24,827.0 Total Water Area 728.9 Total Hydric Area 6,461.3 Total NWI Area 4,094.8 Acreages for land area, water, hydric soils and National Wetland Inventory (NWI) wetlands provided by NH GRANIT (http://www.granit.sr.unh.edu/).
    [Show full text]
  • Final Northern Pass Transmission Line Project Environmental Impact Statement
    DOE/EIS-0463 FINAL NORTHERN PASS TRANSMISSION LINE PROJECT ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT STATEMENT VOLUME 3: APPENDIX L U.S. DEPARTMENT OF ENERGY OFFICE OF ELECTRICITY DELIVERY AND ENERGY RELIABILITY WASHINGTON, DC AUGUST 2017 Department of Energy Washington, DC 20585 August 2017 Dear Sir/Madam: Enclosed is the final Northern Pass Transmission Line Project Environmental Impact Statement (DOE/EIS-0463) prepared by the Department of Energy (DOE) pursuant to the National Environmental Policy Act of 1969 (NEPA) and its implementing regulations. The United States Forest Service (USFS) – White Mountain National Forest, United States Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) – Region 1, United States Army Corps of Engineers (USACE) – New England District, and the New Hampshire Office of Energy and Planning (NHOEP) are cooperating agencies in the preparation of the EIS. The proposed DOE action in the final EIS is to issue a Presidential permit to the Applicant, Northern Pass LLC, to construct, operate, maintain, and connect a new electric transmission line across the U.S./Canada border in northern New Hampshire (NH). DOE has prepared this final EIS to evaluate the potential environmental impacts in the United States of the proposed action and the range of reasonable alternatives, including the No Action alternative. Under the No Action alternative, the Presidential permit would not be granted, and the proposed transmission line would not cross the U.S./Canada border. In addition to its Presidential permit application to DOE, Northern Pass LLC applied to the USFS for a special use permit that would authorize Northern Pass LCC to construct, own, operate and maintain an electric transmission line to cross portions of the White Mountain National Forest under its jurisdiction.
    [Show full text]
  • Senate Bill 5 Legislation & Report
    DRED – Division of Parks and Recreation STRATEGIC DEVELOPMENT and CAPITAL IMPROVEMENT PLAN, 2009 Appendix 1 – Senate Bill 5 Legislation and Report CHAPTER 276 SB 5 – FINAL VERSION 03/10/05 0426s 04May2005… 1190h 06/29/05 1923cofc 2005 SESSION 05-0404 04/09 SENATE BILL 5 AN ACT establishing a commission to study the state park system. SPONSORS: Sen. Odell, Dist 8; Sen. Eaton, Dist 10; Sen. Larsen, Dist 15; Sen. Gallus, Dist 1; Rep. Craig, Hills 9; Rep. Spang, Straf 7; Rep. Brueggemann, Merr 12; Rep. Russell, Belk 6 COMMITTEE: Environment and Wildlife AMENDED ANALYSIS This bill establishes a commission to study the mission of the state park system and the division of parks and recreation, department of resources and economic development, including the continued efficacy of self-funding the state park system, the leasing of public lands and property to private interests and the circumstances under which such leasing is permissible, and the development of a long-term capital improvements plan for the state park system. - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - Explanation: Matter added to current law appears in bold italics. Matter removed from current law appears [in brackets and struckthrough.] Matter which is either (a) all new or (b) repealed and reenacted appears in regular type. 03/10/05 0426s 04May2005… 1190h 06/29/05 1923cofc Page A1 - 1 DRED – Division of Parks and Recreation STRATEGIC DEVELOPMENT and CAPITAL IMPROVEMENT PLAN, 2009 Appendix 1 – Senate Bill 5 Legislation and Report 05-0404 04/09 STATE OF NEW HAMPSHIRE In the Year of Our Lord Two Thousand Five AN ACT establishing a commission to study the state park system.
    [Show full text]
  • Lancaster Weather Summary
    www.newhampshirelakesandmountains.com Publishing news & views of Lancaster, Groveton, Whitefield, Lunenburg & other towns of the upper Connecticut River valley of New Hampshire & Vermont [email protected] VOL. CXLIV, NO. 9 WEDNESDAY, FEBRUARY 29, 2012 LANCASTER, NEW HAMPSHIRE TELEPHONE: 603-788-4939 FORTY PAGES 75¢ Todd Lamarque to become Fire contained in inside shop structure at Lancaster School principal on July 1 Whitefield power plant Fay and McLean will be part-time administrators 41 firefighters from 7 area By Edith Tucker timing will also allow Lamarque to insurance coverage, on a pro-rated F.D.s fight flames [email protected] be heavily involved in hiring a new basis. By Edith Tucker and supplies, fasteners and fittings WHITEFIELD — The WMRSD assistant principal. This new arrangement will cost [email protected] and a variety of consumables was school board voted unanimously, The board also voted unani- about $3,000 less than now and in- WHITEFIELD — Fire was re- destroyed, said Whitefield Fire 4 to 0, at a special 8 a.m. school mously to divide up the responsi- clude 25 additional workdays. ported at 6:58 a.m. on Wednesday, Chief James “J” Watkins. board meeting on Thursday to bilities of today’s position of Di- Both will work in the Central Office Feb. 22, in the ground-level main- The Whitefield Fire Depart- make administrative changes de- rector of Student Services into two on King’s Square. tenance shop inside the main ment along with mutual aid fire de- signed to keep experience on hand discrete part-time positions, effec- Fensom explained his thinking building of the wood-chip burning partments — Twin Mountain, Jef- while tapping Lancaster School as- tive July 1.
    [Show full text]
  • The Nash Stream Project: Restoring River Processes and Connectivity
    The Nash Stream Project: Restoring river processes and connectivity Jim MacCartney, Principal, River Solutions LLC John Magee, Fish Habitat Biologist, NH Fish and Game Department 1 • Watershed area: 115 km2 (44 mi2) • Stream length: 21+ km (13+ mi) • 3rd and 4th order • Nine major perennial tributaries • Ownership: > 90% public • Landscape/vegetation: glaciated with mixed forest • Minimal infrastructure • Native salmonid: EBT 2 History • Working forest • 1852 to present 3 Dam break – May 1969 Flow 4 Flood of record USGS 01130000 Upper Ammonoosuc River near Groveton, NH 800 700 /s 3 600 500 400 300 200 Annual Peak Streamflow in m 100 0 1941 1951 1961 1971 1981 1991 2001 2011 Year 5 1969 flood footprint 6 Impacts of flood • Loss of LWM and channel complexity • Disconnected floodplains • Depleted riparian forest • Habitat fragmentation - impassable culverts 7 Water quality impairments Section 319 nonpoint source Non-pollutant Solutions • Habitat degradation • Remediate undersized culverts • Hydrologic modification • Restore natural river processes • Channel morphology • Instream habitat • Floodplain connection 8 Watershed plan • EPA-approved alternative ‘a-i’ (geomorphic based) • Determined causes of channel instability • Delineated and characterized 95 segments • Identified restoration options • Condition of eight geomorphic and habitat features, including pools, wood, and riparian vegetation 9 2005 comprehensive fish survey 2005 stream crossing assessment (AOP) 2007 geomorphic assessment Instream restoration designs Placed Placed Mid-
    [Show full text]
  • New Hampshire Wildlife Action Plan Appendix B Habitats -1 Appendix B: Habitats
    Appendix B: Habitats Appendix B: Habitat Profiles Alpine ............................................................................................................................................................ 2 Appalachian Oak Pine Forest ........................................................................................................................ 9 Caves and Mines ......................................................................................................................................... 19 Grasslands ................................................................................................................................................... 24 Hemlock Hardwood Pine Forest ................................................................................................................. 34 High Elevation Spruce‐Fir Forest ................................................................................................................. 45 Lowland Spruce‐Fir Forest .......................................................................................................................... 53 Northern Hardwood‐Conifer Forest ........................................................................................................... 62 Pine Barrens ................................................................................................................................................ 72 Rocky Ridge, Cliff, and Talus ......................................................................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • Nancy+ Azara+ CV
    A.I.R. NANCY AZARA CV website: nancyazara.com email: [email protected] EDUCATION AAS Finch College, N.Y. BS Empire State College S.U.N.Y Art Students League of New York, Sculpture with John Hovannes, Painting and Drawing with Edwin Dickinson Lester Polakov Studio of Stage Design, New York City SELECTED SOLO EXHIBITIONS 2021 High Chair and Other Works, A.I.R. Gallery, Brooklyn, NY 2020 Gold Coat with Red Triangle, Gallery Z, Windows Exhibition, New York, NY 2019 The Meeting of the Birds, curated by Robert Tomlinson, Kaaterskill Fine Arts Gallery, Hunter Village Square, NY 2018 Nancy Azara: Nature Prints, a cabinet installation, curated by Claudia Sbrissa, Saint John’s University, Queens, NY 2017 Passage of the Ghost Ship: Trees and Vines, The Picture Gallery at The Saint- Gaudens Memorial, Cornish, New Hampshire 2016 Tuscan Spring: Rubbings, Scrolls and Other Works, curated by Harry J Weil, A.I.R. Gallery, Brooklyn, NY 2015 Allegory of Leaves, (3 person show) The Harold B. Lemmerman Gallery, New Jersey City University, Jersey City, NJ 2015 I am the Vine, You are the Branches, St. Ann & the Holy Trinity Church, Brooklyn, NY 2013 Of leaves and vines . A shiing braid of lines, SACI Gallery, Florence, Italy 2012 Natural Linking, (3 Person Show) Traffic Zone Center for Visual Arts, Minneapolis, MN 2011 Spirit Taking Form: Rubbings, Tracings and Carvings, Gaga Arts Center, Garnerville, NY 2010 Spirit Taking Form: Rubbings, Tracings and Carvings, Fairleigh Dickinson University, Teaneck, NJ 2010 Nancy Azara: Winter Song, Andre Zarre Gallery, NYC, NY 2009 Nancy Azara, Suffolk Community College, Long Island, NY 2008 Nancy Azara, Sanyi Museum, Miaoli, Taiwan 2008 Maxi’s Wall, A.I.R.
    [Show full text]
  • New Hampshire!
    New Hampshire Fish and Game Department NEW HAMPSHIRE FRESHWATER FISHING 2021 DIGEST Jan. 1–Dec. 31, 2021 Go Fish New Hampshire! Nearly 1,000 fishable lakes and 12,000 miles of rivers and streams… The Official New Hampshire fishnh.com Digest of Regulations Why Smoker Craft? It takes a true fisherman to know what makes a better fishing experience. That’s why we’re constantly taking things to the next level with design, engineering and construction that deliver best-in-class aluminum fishing boats for every budget. \\Pro Angler: \\Voyager: Grab Your Friends and Head for the Water Years of Worry-Free Reliability More boat for your bucks. The Smoker Craft Pro Angler The Voyager is perfect for the no-nonsense angler. aluminum fishing boat series leads the way with This spacious and deep boat is perfect for the first feature-packed value. time boat buyer or a seasoned veteran who is looking for a solid utility boat. Laconia Alton Bay Hudson 958 Union Ave., PO Box 6145, 396 Main Street 261 Derry Road Route 102 Laconia, NH 03246 Alton Bay, NH 03810 Hudson, NH 03051 603-524-6661 603-875-8848 603-595-7995 www.irwinmarine.com Jan. 1–Dec. 31, 2021 NEW HAMPSHIRE Fish and Game Department FRESHWATER FISHING 2021 DIGEST Lakes and Rivers Galore I am new to Fish and Game, but I was born and raised in New Hampshire and have spent a lifetime working in the outdoors of our Granite State. I grew up with my friends ice fishing for lake trout and cusk on the hard waters of Lake Winnipesaukee and Lake Winnisquam with my father and his friends.
    [Show full text]
  • Phase Ia Archaeological Survey Granite Reliable Power, Llc Proposed Windpark
    PHASE IA ARCHAEOLOGICAL SURVEY GRANITE RELIABLE POWER, LLC PROPOSED WINDPARK COOS COUNTY NEW HAMPSHIRE Prepared by: THE Louis Berger Group, INC. 20 Corporate Woods Blvd. Albany, New York 12211 Prepared for: Granite Reliable Power, LLC a subsidiary of Noble Environmental Power, LLC 8 Railroad Avenue April 2008 Essex, Connecticut 06426 Phase IA Archaeological Survey Granite Reliable Power, LLC, Proposed Windpark Coos County, New Hampshire Abstract On behalf of Granite Reliable Power, LLC, a subsidiary of Noble Environmental Power, LLC, of Essex, Connecticut, The Louis Berger Group, Inc. (Berger), has completed a Phase IA archaeological investigation for the proposed Granite Reliable Power Windpark (Windpark), Coos County, New Hampshire. The purpose of the survey was to identify and assess areas of archaeological sensitivity (or potential) and identify any archaeological sites within the area of potential effects (APE), which for this survey includes all parts of the proposed Windpark that will be subject to ground disturbance, including turbine construction, access road improvements and construction, collection line installation, and switchyard and substation construction. This investigation was designed in accordance with guidelines issued by the New Hampshire Department of Historical Resources (NHDHR). The Windpark is proposed for installation on private land in the central portion of Coos County, encompassing a total area of approximately 80,000 acres, of which the APE is a subset. The Windpark is located in a current logging area in the White Mountains region of north-central New Hampshire. The northern extent of the wind turbine locations within the APE includes the upper reaches of Dixville Peak. Moving south, the wind turbine area includes the named summits of Mt.
    [Show full text]