DOCSLIB.ORG

UNO Template

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text

Load more

05 December 2012 Asia Pacific/China Equity Research Technology Hardware & Equipment Asia Semiconductor Sector Research Analysts SUPPLY CHAIN RESEARCH Randy Abrams, CFA 886 2 2715 6366 [email protected] Greater China IC Design powering the Yan Taw Boon 852 2101 7039 whitebox tablet ecosystem [email protected] Figure 1: Whitebox tablet builds at 50 mn in 2012 and 80-120 mn in 2013 CPU silicon IP 3D GPU silicon IP Foundries 300 250 Apps Processors 200 Touch screen controllers 150 100 Wireless and audio 50 - CY2012E CY2013E CMOS Apps processor image + baseband Branded tablets (mn units) White-box tablets (mn units) sensor Source: Company data, Credit Suisse estimates ■ Improving whitebox tablets expanding tablet TAM. The global tablet market is accelerating as whitebox tablets rapidly improve in functionality in the US$60-200 price range, below tier-one tablets. Initial demand is being led by Chinese makers exporting to emerging markets with low PC penetration, mainly for entertainment (games, movies, music) but have begun to offer productivity as keyboard attachments and apps proliferate. Whitebox tablets add 50 mn and 80-120 mn units to our 2012/13E global tablet estimate of 112 mn and 171 mn (45%/47% upside), respectively. Given cost sensitivity, pricing of Flash, DRAM, and touch display is the key swing factor to whitebox volumes. ■ Greater Chinese IC Design leading momentum. Greater China fabless leads in the space due to close ties to Shenzhen production/design base. ARM has lowered the entry barrier with dual / quad core Cortex processors, with leading domestic Chinese fabless Allwinner, Rockchip, Actions shipping dual-core now and quad-core in 1H13. For higher-end tablets, Mediatek is supplying MT6577/8377 and has 28nm chipsets on 2013 roadmap. CMOS sensors are led by Galaxycore, touch controller by Goodix, FocalTech, Elan, and Pixcir, wireless connectivity by Realtek / RDA, driver ICs by Novatek, Himax, Orise, Silicon Works, audio codec by Realtek and crystal by TXC. ■ Stocks to play on the theme. Low-cost computing is an emerging product cycle with legs in 2013 as common components span across tablets and smartphones. Most leveraged sales contribution to the expected doubling in low- cost tablet volumes in 2013 includes 10-15% of sales for SMIC and WPG, 5- 10% for Realtek and Mediatek and 5% for TXC, Chipbond, Novatek, and Himax. DISCLOSURE APPENDIX CONTAINS ANALYST CERTIFICATIONS AND THE STATUS OF NON US ANALYSTS. FOR OTHER IMPORTANT DISCLOSURES, visit www.credit-suisse.com/researchdisclosures or call +1 (877) 291-2683 US Disclosure: Credit Suisse does and seeks to do business with companies covered in its research reports. As a result, investors should be aware that the Firm may have a conflict of interest that could affect the objectivity of this report. Investors should consider this report as only a single factor in making their investment decision. CREDIT SUISSE SECURITIES RESEARCH & ANALYTICS BEYOND INFORMATION™ Client-Driven Solutions, Insights, and Access 05 December 2012 Focus tables Figure 2: BOM cost of whitebox tablets versus branded tablets Entry-level Mid-end White- High-end White- iPad mini (wifi Samsung Galaxy Nexus 7 Nexus 7 Kindle Fire (US$) White-box tablet box tablet box tablet only) Note (HSPA +) Memory 8GB 8GB 8GB 8GB 16GB 8GB 16GB 16GB Display and resolution 7" 1024x600 10" 1024x768 10" 1280x800 7" 1280x800 7" 1280x801 7" 1024x600 7.9" 1024x768 10.1" 1280x800 Processor Allwinner A10 Amlogic AM8726 Rockchip RK3066 Nvidia Tegra 3 Nvidia Tegra 4 TI OMAP 4 APL2498 Samsung Exynos 4 Camera 0.3MP 1.3MP 2.0MP 1.2MP 1.2MP N/A 5.0MP + 1.2MP 5.0MP + 2.0MP Memory 4.00 10.00 15.00 13.50 21.00 13.35 15.50 45.00 Display and Touchscreen 20.00 50.00 70.00 62.00 62.00 59.00 80.00 100.00 Processor 4.00 8.00 12.50 21.00 21.00 13.50 13.00 18.80 Camera 1.00 1.50 2.00 2.50 2.50 N/A 11.00 15.00 Wireless - BB/RF/PA N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A 15.00 User Interface / Combo Module (WLAN/BT/FM) 3.00 5.00 8.00 11.00 11.00 8.60 15.00 18.00 Power Management 1.00 2.00 4.00 5.50 5.50 5.00 7.50 12.00 Battery 3.00 8.00 12.00 12.75 12.75 12.75 13.50 18.00 Mechanical/Electro-Mechancial/Other 2.00 10.00 17.00 20.00 20.00 18.50 26.00 35.00 Box Contents 1.00 2.00 3.00 3.50 3.50 3.10 6.00 6.00 Manufacturing Cost 1.00 3.00 6.00 7.50 7.50 6.00 10.00 10.00 BOM + Manufacturing $ 40.00 $ 99.50 $ 149.50 $ 159.25 $ 166.75 $ 139.80 $ 197.50 $ 292.80 Source: iSuppli, Credit Suisse estimates Figure 3: Semiconductor suppliers benefiting from low-cost tablet adoption Segments Listed companies Private companies Foundries TSMC, SMIC, UMC Back-end ASE, SPIL Apps processors Mediatek, Ingenic Allwinner, Rockchip, Nufront, AMLogic CMOS image sensor Omnivision GalaxyCore Touch screen controllers Elan, Goodix (Mediatek subsidiary) FocalTech, Pixcir Wireless Realtek, RDA Huawei/Hisilicon Driver ICs Novatek, Himax, Orise Audio Realtek Silicon IP ARM, Imaginations technologies Vivante Source: Company data, Credit Suisse estimates Figure 4: Chinese fabless catching up with overseas players on quad-core for whitebox tablets by ramping in 1H13 Company Freescale Samsung NVIDIA Allwinner Rockchip Actions Tablet AP i.MX6 Quad Exynos 4 Tegra 3 A31 RK31XX ATM7029 Multi-core Quad-core Quad-core Quad-core Quad-core Quad-core Quad-core CPU ARM Cortex-A9 ARM Cortex-A9 ARM Cortex-A9 ARM Cortex-A7 ARM Cortex-A9 ARM Cortex Clock speed 1.5GHz 1.4/1.6 GHz 1.6GHz 1.5 GHz 1.6GHz 1.2GHz PowerVR PowerVR ARM Mali GeForce ARM Mali-400 ARM Mali-400 Graphics SGX543 Process node N/A 32nm 40nm 40nm 40nm 40nm Availability Oct-12 2H12 2H12 4Q12 4Q12 4Q12 Source: Company data Figure 5: Mediatek’s 2013 tablet chipset roadmap High-end Mid-end (BB+AP) Low-end Chipset model MT81xx MT838x MT8317 Process node 28nm 28nm 40nm CPU Quad-core Dual-core Dual-core CA9 Graphics Mutli-core Mutli-core PowerVR SGX531 GPU Key selling point 3D Video / 3D display 720p HD video@30fps Integrated baseband Source: Company data Figure 6: 2012/13E global tablet unit shipment estimates (with / without whitebox) Mar-12 Jun-12 Sep-12 Dec-12E 2012E 2013E Total (ex-whitebox) 18,266 25,024 29,028 39,908 112,227 171,449 Whitebox 6,000 11,000 16,000 17,000 50,000 80,000 Grand total 24,266 36,024 45,028 56,908 162,227 251,449 Grant total / ex-whitebox 33% 44% 55% 43% 45% 47% Source: Company data, Credit Suisse estimates Asia Semiconductor Sector 2 05 December 2012 Greater China IC Design powering the whitebox tablet ecosystem The global tablet market is seeing a new stage of growth similar to feature phones, and Low-cost whitebox tablets now smartphones, where a new class of whitebox tablets expands the global market into a momentum growing new entry level tier of products for emerging markets. The whitebox tablet ecosystem started gaining momentum in 2010 as digital photo frame and MP4 makers began adding features to their products with early versions of Android 2.x or Windows 7. The early devices had limited traction due to still buggy software and inadequate component supply. In 2012, we have seen an inflection point in this market with the introduction of Android 4.0, a release that standardised applications across smartphones and tablets and brought Android’s more successful ecosystem into the tablet market. At the same time, ARM is lowering the entry barrier for chip makers to enable low-cost computing, allowing multiple Chinese IC design companies to offer above 1 GHz single and dual-core products with GPU cores capable of processing multimedia video and games. The make-up of the entry level tablet We define the low-cost whitebox tablet as an unbranded or regionally branded mobile Internet device that (1) has touch-enabled screens ranging from 7” to 10”, (2) is powered by Android, (3) is equipped with WiFi or 3G connectivity, and (4) is retailing for US$50-200. Within that $50-100 price range, a 7-inch entry level WiFi only starts from US$53 in 5,000+ quantities or US$85 with 3G, US$110 with higher resolution IPS display and 3G and Mediatek dual core chipset, and $150-200 at the top end for 10” with Samsung Exynos or NVIDIA Tegra. In retail, these prices range from US$60-180. Please refer to Appendix for more whitebox tablet specifications. Figure 7: A 7-inch entry-level whitebox tablet with FOB of US$53 (an extra US$32 for 3G) Pricing (8GB version, HD screen, wifi, BT, GPS) Sample unit US$68 100 unit US$62 1000 unit US$56 5000 unit US$53 Notes: 1. +$32 to upgrade to 3G vesion Source: Company data Lean cost structure enabling lower price points Low-cost whitebox tablets have substantially lower cost structure and they target a much Entry level BOM cost is only lower price tier compared to their branded counterparts. The low-cost tablet makers US$40, mid-end at US$100, operate small and lean manufacturing in Shenzhen and locally source components in high-end at US$150 China and Taiwan, with only a few high-end SKUs using more advanced precision assembly and high-end components.
Recommended publications
  • Bootstomp: on the Security of Bootloaders in Mobile Devices

    Bootstomp: on the Security of Bootloaders in Mobile Devices

    BootStomp: On the Security of Bootloaders in Mobile Devices Nilo Redini, Aravind Machiry, Dipanjan Das, Yanick Fratantonio, Antonio Bianchi, Eric Gustafson, Yan Shoshitaishvili, Christopher Kruegel, and Giovanni Vigna, UC Santa Barbara https://www.usenix.org/conference/usenixsecurity17/technical-sessions/presentation/redini This paper is included in the Proceedings of the 26th USENIX Security Symposium August 16–18, 2017 • Vancouver, BC, Canada ISBN 978-1-931971-40-9 Open access to the Proceedings of the 26th USENIX Security Symposium is sponsored by USENIX BootStomp: On the Security of Bootloaders in Mobile Devices Nilo Redini, Aravind Machiry, Dipanjan Das, Yanick Fratantonio, Antonio Bianchi, Eric Gustafson, Yan Shoshitaishvili, Christopher Kruegel, and Giovanni Vigna fnredini, machiry, dipanjan, yanick, antoniob, edg, yans, chris, [email protected] University of California, Santa Barbara Abstract by proposing simple mitigation steps that can be im- plemented by manufacturers to safeguard the bootloader Modern mobile bootloaders play an important role in and OS from all of the discovered attacks, using already- both the function and the security of the device. They deployed hardware features. help ensure the Chain of Trust (CoT), where each stage of the boot process verifies the integrity and origin of 1 Introduction the following stage before executing it. This process, in theory, should be immune even to attackers gaining With the critical importance of the integrity of today’s full control over the operating system, and should pre- mobile and embedded devices, vendors have imple- vent persistent compromise of a device’s CoT. However, mented a string of inter-dependent mechanisms aimed at not only do these bootloaders necessarily need to take removing the possibility of persistent compromise from untrusted input from an attacker in control of the OS in the device.
  • GPU Developments 2018

    GPU Developments 2018

    GPU Developments 2018 2018 GPU Developments 2018 © Copyright Jon Peddie Research 2019. All rights reserved. Reproduction in whole or in part is prohibited without written permission from Jon Peddie Research. This report is the property of Jon Peddie Research (JPR) and made available to a restricted number of clients only upon these terms and conditions. Agreement not to copy or disclose. This report and all future reports or other materials provided by JPR pursuant to this subscription (collectively, “Reports”) are protected by: (i) federal copyright, pursuant to the Copyright Act of 1976; and (ii) the nondisclosure provisions set forth immediately following. License, exclusive use, and agreement not to disclose. Reports are the trade secret property exclusively of JPR and are made available to a restricted number of clients, for their exclusive use and only upon the following terms and conditions. JPR grants site-wide license to read and utilize the information in the Reports, exclusively to the initial subscriber to the Reports, its subsidiaries, divisions, and employees (collectively, “Subscriber”). The Reports shall, at all times, be treated by Subscriber as proprietary and confidential documents, for internal use only. Subscriber agrees that it will not reproduce for or share any of the material in the Reports (“Material”) with any entity or individual other than Subscriber (“Shared Third Party”) (collectively, “Share” or “Sharing”), without the advance written permission of JPR. Subscriber shall be liable for any breach of this agreement and shall be subject to cancellation of its subscription to Reports. Without limiting this liability, Subscriber shall be liable for any damages suffered by JPR as a result of any Sharing of any Material, without advance written permission of JPR.
  • Streaming Integrated Amplifier User’S Manual U S E’ S M an U a L

    Streaming Integrated Amplifier User’S Manual U S E’ S M an U a L

    OmniaOmnia A300 Streaming Integrated Amplifier User’s Manual U S E’ S M AN U A L Table of Contents FCC NOTICE - DECLARATION OF CONFORMITY INFORMATION .................................................................... 2 EU DECLARATION OF CONFORMITY ........................................................................................................... 3 SAFETY INSTRUCTIONS ............................................................................................................................. 4 WHAT’S IN THE BOX .................................................................................................................................. 7 QUICK SETUP GUIDE .............................................................................................................................. 8 WIRELESS AUTO SETUP ............................................................................................................................. 9 CONTROLLING MULTIPLE A300 AND RE-STREAMING ........................................................................ 14 WIRELESS MANUAL SETUP ................................................................................................................. 16 INTRODUCTION ................................................................................................................................... 17 TECHNICAL HIGHLIGHTS ......................................................................................................................... 17 LISTENING OPTIMIZATION .....................................................................................................................
  • Mediatek Linkit™ Development Platform for RTOS Get Started Guide

    Mediatek Linkit™ Development Platform for RTOS Get Started Guide

    MediaTek LinkIt™ Development Platform for RTOS Get Started Guide Version: 3.0 Release date: 30 June 2016 © 2015 - 2016 MediaTek Inc. This document contains information that is proprietary to MediaTek Inc. (“MediaTek”) and/or its licensor(s). MediaTek cannot grant you permission for any material that is owned by third parties. You may only use or reproduce this document if you have agreed to and been bound by the applicable license agreement with MediaTek (“License Agreement”) and been granted explicit permission within the License Agreement (“Permitted User”). If you are not a Permitted User, please cease any access or use of this document immediately. Any unauthorized use, reproduction or disclosure of this document in whole or in part is strictly prohibited. THIS DOCUMENT IS PROVIDED ON AN “AS-IS” BASIS ONLY. MEDIATEK EXPRESSLY DISCLAIMS ANY AND ALL WARRANTIES OF ANY KIND AND SHALL IN NO EVENT BE LIABLE FOR ANY CLAIMS RELATING TO OR ARISING OUT OF THIS DOCUMENT OR ANY USE OR INABILITY TO USE THEREOF. Specifications contained herein are subject to change without notice. MediaTek LinkIt™ Development Platform for RTOS Get Started Guide Document Revision History Revision Date Description 1.0 24 March 2016 Initial version. 2.0 17 May 2016 Move the contents relative to flash, HDK, and build comments to corresponding documents. Add the support of Keil 3.0 30 June 2016 Add the support of IAR. Refine the architecture and provide more information on the SDK usage. © 2015 - 2016 MediaTek Inc. Page i of v This document contains information that is proprietary to MediaTek Inc.
  • Performance Analysis and Optimization Opportunities for NVIDIA Automotive Gpus

    Performance Analysis and Optimization Opportunities for NVIDIA Automotive Gpus

    Performance Analysis and Optimization Opportunities for NVIDIA Automotive GPUs Hamid Tabani∗, Fabio Mazzocchetti∗y, Pedro Benedicte∗y, Jaume Abella∗ and Francisco J. Cazorla∗ ∗ Barcelona Supercomputing Center y Universitat Politecnica` de Catalunya Abstract—Advanced Driver Assistance Systems (ADAS) and products such as Renesas R-Car H3 [1], NVIDIA Jetson Autonomous Driving (AD) bring unprecedented performance TX2 [20] and NVIDIA Jetson Xavier [35], [27] have already requirements for automotive systems. Graphic Processing Unit reached the market building upon GPU technology inherited (GPU) based platforms have been deployed with the aim of meeting these requirements, being NVIDIA Jetson TX2 and from the high-performance domain. Automotive GPUs have its high-performance successor, NVIDIA AGX Xavier, relevant inherited designs devised for the high-performance domain representatives. However, to what extent high-performance GPU with the aim of reducing costs in the design, verification and configurations are appropriate for ADAS and AD workloads validation process for chip manufacturers. remains as an open question. Unfortunately, reusability of high-performance hardware This paper analyzes this concern and provides valuable does not consider GPUs efficiency in the automotive domain insights on this question by modeling two recent automotive NVIDIA GPU-based platforms, namely TX2 and AGX Xavier. In and, to the best of our knowledge, the design space for GPUs, particular, our work assesses their microarchitectural parameters where resources are sized with the aim of optimizing specific against relevant benchmarks, identifying GPU setups delivering goals such as performance, has not been yet thoroughly increased performance within a similar cost envelope, or decreas- performed for the automotive domain. ing hardware costs while preserving original performance levels.
  • Mediatek Inc. 2019 Annual General Shareholders' Meeting Minutes

    Mediatek Inc. 2019 Annual General Shareholders' Meeting Minutes

    MediaTek Inc. 2019 Annual General Shareholders’ Meeting Minutes Time: 9:00 a.m., June 14, 2019 Place: International Convention Center, MediaTek Inc. (No. 1, Dusing 1st Road, Hsinchu Science Park, Hsinchu City, Taiwan R.O.C.) The Number of Shares of Attendance: Attending shareholders and proxy represented 1,305,281,888 shares (including 1,066,881,115 shares which attended through electronic voting) accounting for 82.30% of 1,585,899,498 shares, the Company’s total outstanding shares (deducting non-voting shares as required in Article 179 of the Company Act) Directors Present: Ming-Kai Tsai, Rick Tsai, Ching-Jiang Hsieh, Wayne Liang, Cheng-Yaw Sun, Peng-Heng Chang, Chung-Yu Wu Chairman: Mr. Ming-Kai Tsai Recorder: Ms. Emma Chang Call the Meeting to Order: The aggregate shareholding of the shareholders present constituted a quorum. The Chairman called the meeting to order. 1. Chairman’s Remarks: Omitted. 2. Reporting Items: Report Item (1) Subject: MediaTek’s 2018 business report. Explanatory Note: MediaTek’s 2018 business report is attached hereto as Attachment 1. (Noted) Report Item (2) Subject: Audit Committee’s review report on the 2018 financial statements. Explanatory Note: 2018 Audit Committee’s review report is attached hereto as Attachment 2. (Noted) Report Item (3) Subject: Report on 2018 employees’ compensation and remuneration to directors. Explanatory Note: (1). According to Article 24 of the Company's Articles of Incorporation, if there is any profit for a specific fiscal year, the Company shall allocate no less than 1% of the profit as employees’ compensation and shall allocate at a maximum of 0.5% of the profit as remuneration to directors, provided that the Company’s accumulated losses shall have been covered in advance.
  • NVIDIA Launches Tegra X1 Mobile Super Chip

    NVIDIA Launches Tegra X1 Mobile Super Chip

    NVIDIA Launches Tegra X1 Mobile Super Chip Maxwell GPU Architecture Delivers First Teraflops Mobile Processor, Powering Deep Learning and Computer Vision Applications NVIDIA today unveiled Tegra® X1, its next-generation mobile super chip with over one teraflops of processing power – delivering capabilities that open the door to unprecedented graphics and sophisticated deep learning and computer vision applications. Tegra X1 is built on the same NVIDIA Maxwell™ GPU architecture rolled out only months ago for the world's top-performing gaming graphics card, the GeForce® GTX 980. The 256-core Tegra X1 provides twice the performance of its predecessor, the Tegra K1, which is based on the previous-generation Kepler™ architecture and debuted at last year's Consumer Electronics Show. Tegra processors are built for embedded products, mobile devices, autonomous machines and automotive applications. Tegra X1 will begin appearing in the first half of the year. It will be featured in the newly announced NVIDIA DRIVE™ car computers. DRIVE PX is an auto-pilot computing platform that can process video from up to 12 onboard cameras to run capabilities providing Surround-Vision, for a seamless 360-degree view around the car, and Auto-Valet, for true self-parking. DRIVE CX is a complete cockpit platform designed to power the advanced graphics required across the increasing number of screens used for digital clusters, infotainment, head-up displays, virtual mirrors and rear-seat entertainment. "We see a future of autonomous cars, robots and drones that see and learn, with seeming intelligence that is hard to imagine," said Jen-Hsun Huang, CEO and co-founder, NVIDIA.
  • – Amlogic S905X2 Chipset – Armv8-A Architecture – ARM G31

    – Amlogic S905X2 Chipset – Armv8-A Architecture – ARM G31

    NV-720 series IPTV Set-Top Boxes Data Sheet Integrated Networking Solutions – Amlogic S905X2 chipset – ARMv8-A architecture – ARM G31 MP2 graphic accelerator – 2D/3D accelerators, support for OpenGL 3.2 – OS Android 9 – App store – Support for widely used Middleware – Android API, SDK – H.265 – 4Kp60 decoding – Wi-Fi 802.11a/b/g/n/ac – HDMI 2.1 NV-720 IPTV set-top boxes on Android ensure a new Peer-to-Peer TV level of service provision. NV-720 series set-top boxes support real-time NV-720 is an excellent way to promote digital television playback of media files via DC++ protocol without a services and to attract new customers. PC or files preloading to a local disk. There is an opportunity of downloaded files queue creation, Android platform background downloading and organization of an NV-711 Android allows the creation of a single universal illustrated page (catalogue) for media content. platform for access to services including AndroidTV interface. Basic services – HD/UHD IPTV Customized app store creation – OTT The open platform and development tools (SDK, API) – VoD make it possible to create new operator services. – Media Player (files playback from external storage media and a local network) Hardware – Electronic program guide (EPG) Quad-core Amlogic media processor supports a wide – Support for cloud services range of audio and video formats. – Online sources: YouTube, Internet radio, etc. – Provider’s app store Up-to-date Wi-Fi technologies – Support for HLS NV-720-WB set-top boxes support up-to-date Wi-Fi – Peer-to-Peer TV (streaming via DC++) standards: 802.11a/b/g/n/ас.
  • Co-Optimizing Performance and Memory Footprint Via Integrated CPU/GPU Memory Management, an Implementation on Autonomous Driving Platform

    Co-Optimizing Performance and Memory Footprint Via Integrated CPU/GPU Memory Management, an Implementation on Autonomous Driving Platform

    Co-Optimizing Performance and Memory Footprint Via Integrated CPU/GPU Memory Management, an Implementation on Autonomous Driving Platform Soroush Bateni*, Zhendong Wang*, Yuankun Zhu, Yang Hu, and Cong Liu The University of Texas at Dallas Abstract—Cutting-edge embedded system applications, such as launches the OpenVINO toolkit for the edge-based deep self-driving cars and unmanned drone software, are reliant on learning inference on its integrated HD GPUs [4]. integrated CPU/GPU platforms for their DNNs-driven workload, Despite the advantages in SWaP features presented by the such as perception and other highly parallel components. In this work, we set out to explore the hidden performance im- integrated CPU/GPU architecture, our community still lacks plication of GPU memory management methods of integrated an in-depth understanding of the architectural and system CPU/GPU architecture. Through a series of experiments on behaviors of integrated GPU when emerging autonomous and micro-benchmarks and real-world workloads, we find that the edge intelligence workloads are executed, particularly in multi- performance under different memory management methods may tasking fashion. Specifically, in this paper we set out to explore vary according to application characteristics. Based on this observation, we develop a performance model that can predict the performance implications exposed by various GPU memory system overhead for each memory management method based management (MM) methods of the integrated CPU/GPU on application characteristics. Guided by the performance model, architecture. The reason we focus on the performance impacts we further propose a runtime scheduler. By conducting per-task of GPU MM methods are two-fold.
  • A Low-Cost Deep Neural Network-Based Autonomous Car

    A Low-Cost Deep Neural Network-Based Autonomous Car

    DeepPicar: A Low-cost Deep Neural Network-based Autonomous Car Michael G. Bechtely, Elise McEllhineyy, Minje Kim?, Heechul Yuny y University of Kansas, USA. fmbechtel, elisemmc, [email protected] ? Indiana University, USA. [email protected] Abstract—We present DeepPicar, a low-cost deep neural net- task may be directly linked to the safety of the vehicle. This work based autonomous car platform. DeepPicar is a small scale requires a high computing capacity as well as the means to replication of a real self-driving car called DAVE-2 by NVIDIA. guaranteeing the timings. On the other hand, the computing DAVE-2 uses a deep convolutional neural network (CNN), which takes images from a front-facing camera as input and produces hardware platform must also satisfy cost, size, weight, and car steering angles as output. DeepPicar uses the same net- power constraints, which require a highly efficient computing work architecture—9 layers, 27 million connections and 250K platform. These two conflicting requirements complicate the parameters—and can drive itself in real-time using a web camera platform selection process as observed in [25]. and a Raspberry Pi 3 quad-core platform. Using DeepPicar, we To understand what kind of computing hardware is needed analyze the Pi 3’s computing capabilities to support end-to-end deep learning based real-time control of autonomous vehicles. for AI workloads, we need a testbed and realistic workloads. We also systematically compare other contemporary embedded While using a real car-based testbed would be most ideal, it computing platforms using the DeepPicar’s CNN-based real-time is not only highly expensive, but also poses serious safety control workload.
  • Certain Semiconductor Devices and Consumer Audiovisual Products Containing the Same That Infringe U.S

    Certain Semiconductor Devices and Consumer Audiovisual Products Containing the Same That Infringe U.S

    UNITED STATES INTERNATIONAL TRADE COMMISSION Washington, D.C. In the Matter of CERTAIN SEMICONDUCTOR Investigation No. 337-TA-1047 DEVICES AND CONSUMER AUDIOVISUAL PRODUCTS CONTAINING THE SAME NOTICE OF COMMISSION DETERMINATION NOT TO REVIEW AN INITIAL DETERMINATION TERMINATING THE INVESTIGATION AS TO ONE RESPONDENT GROUP AGENCY: U.S. International Trade Commission. ACTION: Notice. SUMMARY: Notice is hereby given that the U.S. International Trade Commission has determined not to review an initial determination (“ID”) (Order No. 35) issued by the presiding administrative law judge (“ALJ”). FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Robert Needham, Office of the General Counsel, U.S. International Trade Commission, 500 E Street, SW., Washington, D.C. 20436, telephone (202) 708-5468. Copies of non-confidential documents filed in connection with this investigation are or will be available for inspection during official business hours (8:45 a.m. to 5:15 p.m.) in the Office of the Secretary, U.S. International Trade Commission, 500 E Street, SW., Washington, D.C. 20436, telephone (202) 205- 2000. General information concerning the Commission may also be obtained by accessing its Internet server (https://www.usitc.gov). The public record for this investigation may be viewed on the Commission's electronic docket (EDIS) at https://edis.usitc.gov. Hearing-impaired persons are advised that information on this matter can be obtained by contacting the Commission’s TDD terminal on (202) 205- 1810. SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The Commission instituted this investigation on April 12, 2017, based on a complaint filed by Broadcom Corporation (“Broadcom”) of Irvine, California. 82 FR 17688. The complaint alleges violations of section 337 of the Tariff Act of 1930, as amended, 19 U.S.C.
  • Last Updated 07/12/16 2017 Final Tier Assignment, Alphabetic by Manufacturer Below Is the 2017 Final Tier Assignment Schedule Fo

    Last Updated 07/12/16 2017 Final Tier Assignment, Alphabetic by Manufacturer Below Is the 2017 Final Tier Assignment Schedule Fo

    Last Updated 07/12/16 2017 Final Tier Assignment, Alphabetic by Manufacturer Below is the 2017 Final Tier Assignment Schedule for Washington’s Electronic Product Recycling Program. The purpose of the 2017 Tier Assignment is to determine manufacturer fees owed to the Department of Ecology. These fees are used to cover Ecology’s administrative costs for implementing the E-Cycle Washington program. Ecology identified the manufacturers listed below as the brand owners of electronic products covered by this program (computers, monitors, laptops, televisions, portable DVD players, tablets, and e-Readers). Is Your Registration Up to Date? • Manufacturers who own additional brands of covered electronic products not currently registered must add those brands to their registration. • Brand owners of covered electronic products that are not on this list must register as a new participant. • Brand association list. If you have questions, please contact Christine Haun at 360-407-6107 or [email protected]. 2017 Tier Manufacturer 6 3M Touch Systems 4 3MD Inc. 5 4th Dimension Computer 6 Abacus Office Machines 6 ACC Tech 2 Acer America Corp 6 ADT LLC dba ADT Security Services 6 Afunta LLC 6 AMA Computer Services, LLC 3 Amazon Fulfillment Services, Inc. 6 AMDOE, LLC 6 Amelia World Corp d/b/a LINSAY 5 American Future Tech Corp dba iBuypower 6 American Pumpkins, Inc. 6 American Sunrex Corporation 6 Andteck 6 Angel Computer Systems Inc 2 Apple 6 Associated Computer Specialists 2 Asus Computer International 6 Atron Vision 6 AWA Technology Inc. 6 Axess Products Corporation 6 Azend Group Corp 6 Azpen Innovation, Inc.