DOCSLIB.ORG

Sample of Tribes for the Household Survey and Tribal/TDHE Survey

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Sample of Tribes for the Household Survey and Tribal/TDHE Survey Assessment of Native American, Alaska Native and Native Hawaiian Housing Needs The Household Survey (40 Tribes) Sisseton-Wahpeton Oyate of the Lake Traverse Reservation, South North Central Dakota Bad River Band of the Lake Superior Tribe of Chippewa Indians of Standing Rock Sioux Tribe of North & South Dakota the Bad River Reservation, Wisconsin Lac du Flambeau Band of Lake Superior Chippewa Indians of the Arizona - New Mexico Lac du Flambeau Reservation of Wisconsin Gila River Indian Community of the Gila River Indian Reservation, Minnesota Chippewa Tribe, Minnesota White Earth Band Arizona Red Lake band of Chippewa Indians, Minnesota Navajo Nation, Arizona, New Mexico & Utah Pueblo of Acoma, New Mexico Eastern Pueblo of Santa Clara, New Mexico Eastern Band of Cherokee Indians of North Carolina Salt River Pima-Maricopa Indian Community of the Salt River Lumbee Tribe of North Carolina Reservation, Arizona Echota Cherokee, Alabama San Carlos Apache Tribe of the San Carlos Reservation, Arizona Tohono O'odham Nation of Arizona White Mountain Apache Tribe of the Fort Apache Reservation, Oklahoma/Louisiana Arizona Cherokee Nation, Oklahoma Zuni Tribe of the Zuni Reservation, New Mexico Chickasaw Nation, Oklahoma Choctaw Nation of Oklahoma Citizen Potawatomi Nation, Oklahoma California - Nevada Kaw Nation, Oklahoma; Ponca Tribe of Indians of Oklahoma Paiute-Shoshone Indians of the Bishop Community of the Bishop Muscogee (Creek) Nation, Oklahoma Colony, California Peoria Tribe of Indians of Oklahoma Seminole Nation of Oklahoma Pacific Northwest United Houma Nation, Louisiana Confederated Tribes and Bands of the Yakama Nation, Washington Confederated Tribes of the Warm Springs Reservation of Oregon Plains Lummi Tribe of the Lummi Reservation, Washington Arapahoe and Shoshone Tribes of the Wind River Reservation, Makah Indian Tribe of the Makah Indian Reservation, Washington Wyoming Blackfeet Tribe of the Blackfeet Indian Reservation of Montana Alaska Cheyenne River Sioux Tribe of the Cheyenne River Reservation, Agdaagux Tribe of King Cove South Dakota Chickaloon Native Village Oglala Sioux Tribe of the Pine Ridge Reservation, South Dakota Native Village of Unalakleet Omaha Tribe of Nebraska The Household Survey Reserve List (20 Tribes) Rosebud Sioux Tribe of the Rosebud Indian Reservation, South North Central Dakota Prairie Island Indian Community in the State of Minnesota Santee Sioux Nation, Nebraska Three Affiliated Tribes of the Fort Berthold Reservation, North Dakota Eastern Turtle Mountain Band of Chippewa Indians of North Dakota Mississippi Band of Choctaw Indians, Mississippi Ute Indian Tribe of the Uintah & Ouray Reservation, Utah Passamaquoddy Tribe of Maine Arizona - New Mexico Oklahoma/Louisiana Cocopah Tribe of Arizona Cheyenne and Arapaho Tribes, Oklahoma (formerly the Cheyenne- Hopi Tribe of Arizona Arapaho Tribes of Oklahoma) Pueblo of Santo Domingo, New Mexico Kiowa Indian Tribe of Oklahoma; Comanche Nation, Oklahoma; Fort Sill Apache Tribe of Oklahoma California - Nevada Sac & Fox Nation, Oklahoma Karuk Tribe of California United Houma Nation, Louisiana Alaska Plains Native Village of Barrow Inupiat Traditional Government Confederated Salish & Kootenai Tribes of the Flathead Reservation, Native Village of Gambell Montana Native Village of Goodnews Bay Orutsararmuit Native Village (aka Bethel) *Note: All tribes on this page will also be included in the Tribe / TDHE Survey Assessment of Native American, Alaska Native and Native Hawaiian Housing Needs The Tribe/TDHE Survey Only (60 Tribes) North Central Arizona - New Mexico Menominee Indian Tribe of Wisconsin Ak Chin Indian Community of the Maricopa (Ak Chin) Indian Minnesota Chippewa Tribe, Minnesota Fond du Lac Band Reservation, Arizona Minnesota Chippewa Tribe, Minnesota Leech Lake Band Jicarilla Apache Nation, New Mexico Oneida Tribe of Indians of Wisconsin Mescalero Apache Tribe of the Mescalero Reservation, New Mexico Saginaw Chippewa Indian Tribe of Michigan Pascua Yaqui Tribe of Arizona Sault Ste. Marie Tribe of Chippewa Indians of Michigan Pueblo of Isleta, New Mexico Stockbridge Munsee Community, Wisconsin Pueblo of Jemez, New Mexico Pueblo of Laguna, New Mexico Eastern Pueblo of San Felipe, New Mexico Haliwa-Saponi Indian Tribe Pueblo of Taos, New Mexico Seneca Nation of New York Tonawanda Band of Seneca Indians of New York California - Nevada Tuscarora Nation of New York Hoopa Valley Tribe, California Waccamaw Siouan Tribe Quechan Tribe of the Fort Yuma Indian Reservation, California & Arizona Oklahoma Santa Rosa Indian Community of the Santa Rosa Rancheria, Caddo Nation of Oklahoma California Kiowa Indian Tribe of Oklahoma; Comanche Nation, Oklahoma; Fort Te-Moak Tribe of Western Shoshone Indians of Nevada (Elko Band) Sill Apache Tribe of Oklahoma; Caddo Nation of Oklahoma; Washoe Tribe of Nevada & California (Carson Colony) Wichita and Affiliated Tribes; Delaware Nation of Oklahoma Osage Nation, Oklahoma (formerly the Osage Tribe) Pacific Northwest Pawnee Nation of Oklahoma Confederated Tribes of the Colville Reservation Tonkawa Tribe of Indians of Oklahoma Nisqually Indian Tribe of the Nisqually Reservation, Washington Puyallup Tribe of the Puyallup Reservation, Washington South Central Shoshone-Bannock Tribes of the Fort Hall Reservation of Idaho Kickapoo Tribe of Indians of the Kickapoo Reservation in Kansas Spokane Tribe of the Spokane Reservation, Washington Suquamish Indian Tribe of the Port Madison Reservation, Plains Washington Assiniboine and Sioux Tribes of the Peck Indian Reservation, Tulalip Tribes of the Tulalip Reservation, Washington Montana Chippewa-Cree Indians of the Rocky Boy's Reservation, Montana Alaska Crow Creek Sioux Tribe of the Crow Creek Reservation, South Douglas Indian Association Dakota Knik Tribe Crow Tribe of Montana Metlakatla Indian Community, Annette Island Reserve Fort Belknap Indian Community of the Fort Belknap Reservation of Native Village of Eek Montana Native Village of Kiana Northern Cheyenne Tribe of the Northern Cheyenne Indian Native Village of Kotzebue Reservation New Stuyahok Village Spirit Lake Tribe, North Dakota Nome Eskimo Community Ute Mountain Tribe of the Ute Mountain Reservation, Colorado, New Noorvik Native Community Mexico & Utah Saint Paul Island (See Pribilof Islands Aleut Communities of St. Paul Yankton Sioux Tribe of South Dakota & St. Georges Islands) Sitka Tribe of Alaska Village of Kaltag .
Load more

Recommended publications
  • North: Lummi, Nooksack, Samish, Sauk-Suiattle, Stillaguamish
    Policy 7.01 Implementation Plan Region 2 North (R2N) Community Services Division (CSD) Serving the following Tribes: Lummi Nation, Nooksack Indian Tribe, Samish Indian Nation, Sauk-Suiattle Indian Tribe, Stillaguamish Tribe of Indians, Swinomish Tribal Community, Tulalip Tribes, & Upper Skagit Indian Tribe Biennium Timeframe: July 1, 2021 to June 30, 2022 Revised 04/2021 Annual Key Due Dates: April 1st - CSD Regional Administrators submit 7.01 Plan and Progress Reports (PPRs) to CSD HQ Coordinator. April 13th – CSD HQ Coordinator will submit Executive Summary & 7.01 PPRs to the ESA Office of Assistant Secretary for final review. April 23rd - ESA Office of the Assistant Secretary will send all 7.01 PPRs to Office of Indian Policy (OIP). 7.01 Meetings: January 17th- Cancelled due to inclement weather Next scheduled meeting April 17th, hosted by the Nooksack Indian Tribe. 07/07/20 Virtual 7.01 meeting. 10/16/20 7.01 Virtual meeting 01/15/21 7.01 Virtual 04/16/21 7.01 Virtual 07/16/21 7.01 Virtual Implementation Plan Progress Report Status Update for the Fiscal Year Goals/Objectives Activities Expected Outcome Lead Staff and Target Date Starting Last July 1 Revised 04/2021 Page 1 of 27 1. Work with tribes Lead Staff: to develop Denise Kelly 08/16/2019 North 7.01 Meeting hosted by services, local [email protected] , Tulalip Tribes agreements, and DSHS/CSD Tribal Liaison Memorandums of 10/18/2019 North 7.01 Meeting hosted by Understanding Dan Story, DSHS- Everett (MOUs) that best [email protected] meet the needs of Community Relations 01/17/2020 North 7.01 Meeting Region 2’s Administrator/CSD/ESA scheduled to be hosted by Upper Skagit American Indians.
    [Show full text]
  • Tribal Relations and Consultation at Txdot
    Tribal Relations and Consultation at TxDOT Draft Strategic Plan 2016 Archeological Studies Branch, Cultural Resources Management (CRM) Section, Environmental Affairs Division (ENV) Vision for Tribal Relations and Consultation at TxDOT The Texas Department of Transportation is a best-in-class agency that goes above and beyond the spirit of consultation to work collaboratively with federally recognized Native American tribes toward mutually beneficial outcomes during all levels of the transportation process. Mission of the Tribal Relations and Consultation Program: Build relationships and purposefully collaborate with tribal nations in the planning and implementation of TxDOT projects and programs. In working with tribal nations, TxDOT: . Recognizes the inherent sovereign status and reserved rights of tribes; . Practices and promotes cultural sensitivity when working with tribes; . Honors the spirit of various federal requirements and orders to consult with tribes; . Aims to go above and beyond current practices to foster trust and productivity; . Commits to providing meaningful and substantive consultation with tribes on transportation projects; and . Promotes collaborative consultation opportunities during planning and review processes within TXDOT. 2 Draft Tribal Relations and Consultation Strategic Plan 2016 Foreword Texas’ long and rich cultural history is rooted in the indigenous people who once inhabited the land. Tribal nations continue to have an inherent interest in the state’s natural and cultural resources. Today, the federal government recognizes tribes’ inherent sovereign status, a unique relationship that is embodied in the U.S. Constitution, treaties, court decisions, federal statutes and executive orders. As TxDOT builds a safe and reliable transportation system, the agency (on behalf of the Federal Highway Administration) consults with tribes on statewide transportation plans and projects with federal funding.
    [Show full text]
  • Federal Register/Vol. 65, No. 225/Tuesday, November 21, 2000
    Federal Register / Vol. 65, No. 225 / Tuesday, November 21, 2000 / Notices 69963 Mohican Indians of Wisconsin, the Band of Mohawk Indians of New York, Dated: November 14, 2000. Tonawanda Band of Seneca Indians of the Stockbridge-Munsee Community of John Robbins, New York, and the Tuscarora Nation of Mohican Indians of Wisconsin, the Assistant Director, Cultural Resources New York. Representatives of any other Tonawanda Band of Seneca Indians of Stewardship and Partnerships. Indian tribe that believes itself to be New York, and the Tuscarora Nation of [FR Doc. 00±29810 Filed 11±20±00; 8:45 am] culturally affiliated with these human New York. BILLING CODE 4310±70±F remains and associated funerary objects In 1961±1962, partial human remains should contact Connie Bodner, NAGPRA Liaison, Rochester Museum representing 25 individuals were DEPARTMENT OF THE INTERIOR and Science Center, 657 East Avenue, recovered from the Pen site (Tly 003) in Rochester, NY 14607±2177, telephone Lafayette, Onondaga County, NY, by National Park Service (716) 271±4552, extension 345, before Peter Pratt and other unnamed Notice of Inventory Completion for December 21, 2000. Repatriation of the individuals. These were donated to the Rochester Museum and Science Center Native American Human Remains and human remains to the St. Regis Band of Associated Funerary Objects in the Mohawk Indians of New York may in 1979. No known individuals were identified. No associated funerary Possession of the Rochester Museum begin after that date if no additional and Science Center, Rochester, NY claimants come forward. objects are present. Dated: November 14, 2000. Based on skeletal morphology, these AGENCY: National Park Service, Interior.
    [Show full text]
  • Delaware Indian Land Claims: a Historical and Legal Perspective
    Delaware Indian land Claims: A Historical and Legal Perspective DAVID A. EZZO Alden, New York and MICHAEL MOSKOWITZ Wantagh, New York In this paper we shall discuss Delaware Indian land claims in both a histori­ cal and legal context. The first section of the paper deals with the historical background necessary to understand the land claims filed by the Delaware. In the second part of the paper the focus is on a legal review of the Delaware land claims cases. Ezzo is responsible for the first section while Moskowitz is responsible for the second section. 1. History The term Delaware has been used to describe the descendants of the Native Americans that resided in the Delaware River Valley and other adjacent areas at the start of the 17th century. The Delaware spoke two dialects: Munsee and Unami, both of these belong to the Eastern Algonquian Lan­ guage family. Goddard has noted that the Delaware never formed a single political unit. He also has noted that the term Delaware was only applied to these groups after they had migrated from their original Northeastern homeland. Goddard sums up the Delaware migration as follows: The piecemeal western migration, in the face of white settlement and its attendant pressures during the eighteenth and nineteenth centuries, left the Delaware in a number of widely scattered places in Southern Ontario, Western New York, Wisconsin, Kansas and Oklahoma. Their history involves the repeated divisions and consolidations of many villages and of local, political and linguistic groups that developed in complicated and incompletely known ways. In addition, individuals, families and small groups were constantly moving from place to place.
    [Show full text]
  • Songhees Pictorial
    Songhees Pictorial A History ofthe Songhees People as seen by Outsiders, 1790 - 1912 by Grant Keddie Royal British Columbia Museum, Victoria, 2003. 175pp., illus., maps, bib., index. $39.95. ISBN 0-7726-4964-2. I remember making an appointment with Dan Savard in or­ der to view the Sali sh division ofthe provincial museum's photo collections. After some security precautions, I was ushered into a vast room ofcabi nets in which were the ethnological photographs. One corner was the Salish division- fairly small compared with the larger room and yet what a goldmine of images. [ spent my day thumbing through pictures and writing down the numbers name Songhees appeared. Given the similarity of the sounds of of cool photos I wished to purchase. It didn't take too long to some of these names to Sami sh and Saanich, l would be more cau­ see that I could never personally afford even the numbers I had tious as to whom is being referred. The oldest journal reference written down at that point. [ was struck by the number of quite indicating tribal territory in this area is the Galiano expedi tion excellent photos in the collection, which had not been published (Wagner 1933). From June 5th to June 9th 1792, contact was to my knowledge. I compared this with the few photos that seem maintained with Tetacus, a Makah tyee who accompanied the to be published again and again. Well, Grant Keddie has had expedi tion to his "seed gathering" village at Esquimalt Harbour. access to this intriguing collection, with modern high-resolution At this time, Victoria may have been in Makah territory or at least scanning equipment, and has prepared this edited collecti on fo r high-ranking marriage alliances gave them access to the camus our v1ewmg.
    [Show full text]
  • Tonkawa Indians Before the Time of the Spanish Explorers, Native Americans Inhabited the Open Ranges and Woodlands of Texas
    Tonkawa Indians Before the time of the Spanish explorers, Native Americans inhabited the open ranges and woodlands of Texas. One group that made its mark in history is the Tonkawa Indians. These people were thought to have come to Texas as early as the seventeenth century. Tonkawa, a Waco Indian word, means, “they all stay together,” which eloquently describes this group of nomadic Indian tribes. There is scant archeological evidence of the Tonkawa people, and historians have several theories on the tribal structure and lifestyles of this group. Some believe the Tonkawa were actually a group of independent bands of Indians, which may have included the Sana, Toho, Tohaha, Cantona, and Cava Indians. In the early eighteenth century these bands of Indians were thought to have joined together to form Tonkawa Proper. There is some evidence that the Tonkawa actually came to Texas much earlier as one cohesive group of Tonkawa Indians that lived further north. These nomadic hunters lived in tepees made from buffalo hide, grass and other materials. Tepees allowed bands to easily pack their homes and move with the migrating herds of buffalo or to outrun their enemies. An elected tribal chief led each band of Tonkawa, and each band was composed of maternal clans. Unlike many societies that are patriarchal, the Tonkawa clan membership followed on the side of the mother. When a couple got married, the man would go live with his wife’s clan, and the children would become members of their mother’s clan as well. As a society that always stays together, the Tonkawa established a system that ensured all widows, widowers, and orphaned children were taken care of if their family members died.
    [Show full text]
  • Indigenous People of Western New York
    FACT SHEET / FEBRUARY 2018 Indigenous People of Western New York Kristin Szczepaniec Territorial Acknowledgement In keeping with regional protocol, I would like to start by acknowledging the traditional territory of the Haudenosaunee and by honoring the sovereignty of the Six Nations–the Mohawk, Cayuga, Onondaga, Oneida, Seneca and Tuscarora–and their land where we are situated and where the majority of this work took place. In this acknowledgement, we hope to demonstrate respect for the treaties that were made on these territories and remorse for the harms and mistakes of the far and recent past; and we pledge to work toward partnership with a spirit of reconciliation and collaboration. Introduction This fact sheet summarizes some of the available history of Indigenous people of North America date their history on the land as “since Indigenous people in what is time immemorial”; some archeologists say that a 12,000 year-old history on now known as Western New this continent is a close estimate.1 Today, the U.S. federal government York and provides information recognizes over 567 American Indian and Alaskan Native tribes and villages on the contemporary state of with 6.7 million people who identify as American Indian or Alaskan, alone Haudenosaunee communities. or combined.2 Intended to shed light on an often overlooked history, it The land that is now known as New York State has a rich history of First includes demographic, Nations people, many of whom continue to influence and play key roles in economic, and health data on shaping the region. This fact sheet offers information about Native people in Indigenous people in Western Western New York from the far and recent past through 2018.
    [Show full text]
  • Letter from the Secretary of the Interior, Transmitting an Agreement with the Jiearilla Apache and Certain Ute Indians in the Territory of New Mexico
    University of Oklahoma College of Law University of Oklahoma College of Law Digital Commons American Indian and Alaskan Native Documents in the Congressional Serial Set: 1817-1899 2-3-1874 Letter from the Secretary of the Interior, transmitting an agreement with the Jiearilla Apache and certain Ute Indians in the Territory of New Mexico. Follow this and additional works at: https://digitalcommons.law.ou.edu/indianserialset Part of the Indian and Aboriginal Law Commons Recommended Citation H.R. Exec. Doc. No. 130, 43d Cong., 1st Sess. (1874) This House Executive Document is brought to you for free and open access by University of Oklahoma College of Law Digital Commons. It has been accepted for inclusion in American Indian and Alaskan Native Documents in the Congressional Serial Set: 1817-1899 by an authorized administrator of University of Oklahoma College of Law Digital Commons. For more information, please contact [email protected]. 43n CoNGRESS, } IIOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES. { Ex. Doc. ---lst Session. -= ____ -~ o. ~30. ~ JIOARILLA APACHE AND UTE INDIANS OF ~EW MEXICO. LETTER FF.OM 'THE SECRETARY OF THE INTERIOR, TRANSMITTING An agreement 'With tlte Jicarilla Apache and certain Ute Indians in tlte . 'Territory of New Mexico. FEnRUAHY 5, 1874.-Referred to the Committee on Indian Affairs. FEBRUARY 13, 1874.-0rdered to be printed. DEPAR1'1\1:EN1' OP THE INTERIOR, Wa.shington, D. 0., Februa1•y 0, 1874. SIR: I have the honor to present herewith, for the action of Congress, :an agreement concluded on the lOth of December, 1873, with the Jica­ rilla Apache and certain Ute Indians in the Territory of New Mexico, which provides for their location upon a reservation therein described, and for their relinquishment of all other lands heretofore claimed by them.
    [Show full text]
  • An Examination of Nuu-Chah-Nulth Culture History
    SINCE KWATYAT LIVED ON EARTH: AN EXAMINATION OF NUU-CHAH-NULTH CULTURE HISTORY Alan D. McMillan B.A., University of Saskatchewan M.A., University of British Columbia THESIS SUBMI'ITED IN PARTIAL FULFILLMENT OF THE REQUIREMENTS FOR THE DEGREE OF DOCTOR OF PHILOSOPHY in the Department of Archaeology O Alan D. McMillan SIMON FRASER UNIVERSITY January 1996 All rights reserved. This work may not be reproduced in whole or in part, by photocopy or other means, without permission of the author. APPROVAL Name: Alan D. McMillan Degree Doctor of Philosophy Title of Thesis Since Kwatyat Lived on Earth: An Examination of Nuu-chah-nulth Culture History Examining Committe: Chair: J. Nance Roy L. Carlson Senior Supervisor Philip M. Hobler David V. Burley Internal External Examiner Madonna L. Moss Department of Anthropology, University of Oregon External Examiner Date Approved: krb,,,) 1s lwb PARTIAL COPYRIGHT LICENSE I hereby grant to Simon Fraser University the right to lend my thesis, project or extended essay (the title of which is shown below) to users of the Simon Fraser University Library, and to make partial or single copies only for such users or in response to a request from the library of any other university, or other educational institution, on its own behalf or for one of its users. I further agree that permission for multiple copying of this work for scholarly purposes may be granted by me or the Dean of Graduate Studies. It is understood that copying or publication of this work for financial gain shall not be allowed without my written permission.
    [Show full text]
  • Kansas Settlers on the Osage Diminished Reserve: a Study Of
    KANSAS SETTLERS ON THE OSAGE DIMINISHED RESERVE 168 KANSAS HISTORY A Study of Laura Ingalls Wilder’s Little House on the Prairie by Penny T. Linsenmayer aura Ingalls Wilder’s widely acclaimed “Little the Sturges Treaty in the context of public land policy. Each House” series of children’s novels traces her life side committed acts of violence and property destruction with her parents and sisters from the late 1860s against the other, but historical evidence supports the until her marriage to Almanzo Wilder in 1885. proposition that the majority of both Osages and settlers LThe primary focus of Wilder’s third novel, Little House on favored and actively promoted peaceful relations. Howev- the Prairie, was the interaction between the pioneer settlers er, the overall relationship between the parties was marked of Kansas and the Osage Indians. Wilder’s family settled in by an unavoidable degree of tension. The settlers who pro- Montgomery County, Kansas, in 1869–1870, approximate- moted peaceful relations desired that the land be opened ly one year before the final removal of the Osages to Indi- up to them for settlement, and even the Osages who fa- an Territory. The novel depicts some of the pivotal events vored a speedy removal to Indian Territory merely tolerat- in the relations between the Osages and the intruding set- ed the intruders. tlers during that time period.1 The Ingalls family arrived in Kansas with a large tide The Osages ceded much of their Great Plains territory of other squatters in the summer and fall of 1869, a point at to the United States in the first half of the nineteenth cen- which relations between settlers and Osages were most tury and finally were left in 1865 with one remaining tract strained.
    [Show full text]
  • Communities on Indian Reservations in Arizona
    APPENDIX A TRIBAL COMMUNITIES OF AMERICAN INDIANS IN ARIZONA TRIBAL COMMUNITIES OF AMERICAN INDIANS IN ARIZONA Reservation/Tribe County Community name AK-CHIN INDIAN COMMUNITY Pinal Ak Chin Maricopa COCOPAH TRIBE Yuma Cocopah Reservation COLORADO RIVER INDIAN TRIBE La Paz Parker Parker Valley Poston FORT MCDOWELL YAVAPAI NATION Maricopa Fort McDowell FORT MOJAVE INDIAN TRIBE Mohave Fort Mojave Reservation FORT YUMA-QUECHAN TRIBE Yuma Fort Yuma Reservation GILA RIVER INDIAN COMMUNITY Maricopa Chandler Heights Firebird Lake Gila Crossing Komatke Lone Butte Maricopa Village St. Johns Pinal Bapchule Blackwater Casa Blanca Coclkleburr Goodyear Lower Santan Maricopa North Blackwater Olberg Progressive Colony Sacate Sacaton Sacaton Flats Santa Cruz Snaketown South Casa Blanca South Goodyear Stotonic Sweetwater Upper Santan West Casa Blanca West Chandler Wetcamp TRIBAL COMMUNITIES OF AMERICAN INDIANS IN ARIZONA (continued) Reservation/Tribe County Community name HAVASUPAI NATION Coconino Supai HOPI TRIBE Coconino Coal Mine Mesa Moenave Moenkopi Sand Springs Navajo Bacobi Dennebito Five House Hano Hotevilla Keams Canyon Kykotsmovi Mishongnovi Old Oraibi Polacca Second Mesa Shipaulovi Shungopovi Sichomovi Toreva Wali Polacca Walpi Wepo Village HUALAPAI NATION Coconino Fraziers Well Mohave Hindu Canyon Peach Springs Valentine KAIBAB-PAIUTE TRIBE Mohave Juniper Estates Kaibab Moccasin Redhills Six Mile Steam Boat NAVAJO NATION Apache Allentown Black Mountain Blue Canyon Blue Gap Chinle Cornfields Cottonwood TRIBAL COMMUNITIES OF AMERICAN INDIANS
    [Show full text]
  • Rio Grande National Forest – Assessment 12 Areas of Tribal Importance
    Rio Grande National Forest – Assessment 12 Areas of Tribal Importance Rio Grande National Forest – Assessment 12 Areas of Tribal Importance Contents Introduction .............................................................................................................................................. 2 Information Sources and Gaps.................................................................................................................. 2 Existing Forest Plan Direction for Tribal Resources ................................................................................ 3 Scale of Analysis ................................................................................................................................... 3 Intertribal and Interagency Native American Graves Protection and Repatriation Act Memorandum of Understanding ................................................................................................................................... 4 Existing Tribal Rights ............................................................................................................................... 4 Previous Treaties with Ute Bands ......................................................................................................... 4 Hunting Rights: The Brunot Treaty ...................................................................................................... 5 Spiritual Rights ....................................................................................................................................
    [Show full text]