Boston College Law Review Volume 62 Issue 3 Article 5 3-26-2021 Sovereigns, Freemen, and Desperate Souls: Towards a Rigorous Understanding of Pseudolitigation Tactics in United States Courts Samuel Barrows Boston College Law School,
[email protected] Follow this and additional works at: https://lawdigitalcommons.bc.edu/bclr Part of the Courts Commons, Law and Society Commons, and the Litigation Commons Recommended Citation Samuel Barrows, Sovereigns, Freemen, and Desperate Souls: Towards a Rigorous Understanding of Pseudolitigation Tactics in United States Courts, 62 B.C. L. Rev. 905 (2021), https://lawdigitalcommons.bc.edu/bclr/vol62/iss3/5 This Notes is brought to you for free and open access by the Law Journals at Digital Commons @ Boston College Law School. It has been accepted for inclusion in Boston College Law Review by an authorized editor of Digital Commons @ Boston College Law School. For more information, please contact
[email protected]. SOVEREIGNS, FREEMEN, AND DESPERATE SOULS: TOWARDS A RIGOROUS UNDERSTANDING OF PSEUDOLITIGATION TACTICS IN UNITED STATES COURTS Though this be madness, yet there is method in’t. —Shakespeare, Hamlet Abstract: In recent years, American courts have seen a significant increase in le- gal filings displaying unusual markings and arguing groundless legal theories. These so-called “pseudolegal” filings are the product of an organized network of amateur legal scholars and con artists who represent an ongoing threat to the jus- tice system. They waste judicial time and resources and encourage abuse of Uni- form Commercial Code financing statements for the purpose of harassing others. This Note argues that, in order to combat pseudolaw, courts should make more aggressive use of available gatekeeping tools to screen out these filings.