History Notes 32 the Gunpowder Plot

Total Page:16

File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

History Notes 32 the Gunpowder Plot History Notes 32 The Gunpowder Plot The Gunpowder Plot is well known to all British school children. That it occurred is historical fact, but it has now descended into legend and is celebrated every year on November the fifth when effigies of Guy Fawkes are burned on bonfires. Ashby St. Ledgers has the unenviable notoriety of being one of the places most intimately connected with the Gunpowder Plot. Robert Catesby, the original contriver of the treason, was heir to the estates at Ashby, where his widowed mother was at the time residing. He was an ardent convert to the Catholic faith, and a friend of Father Garnet, the Prefect of the English Jesuits. He inveigled, by his persuasive eloquence, several of the other twelve chief conspirators. They are believed to have met in the room over the gateway to the Manor House, and the apartment is still known by the villagers of the neighbourhood as the "Plot Room". The gate-house is the only part of the ancient manor of the Catesby family that still remains. The family of Catesby was an ancient one, and several of its members had made themselves politically prominent before the framer of the Gunpowder Plot had won his infamous notoriety. Sir William Catesby, who held half a manor in Crick, was one of the three favourites who ruled the kingdom under Richard III (the others being Sir Richard Ratcliffe and Viscount Lovell), on whom the following humorous rhyme was made: "The Rat, the Cat, and Lovell our dog, Rule all England under the Hog", alluding to the king's adoption of a boar as one of the supporters of the royal arms. After the battle of Bosworth, this Sir William Catesby was beheaded at Leicester, and his lands were seized; but Henry VII in 1496 restored them to Catesby's son George, from whom they descended in course of time to Sir William Catesby, who was convicted in 1581, during the reign of Elizabeth, of harbouring Jesuits at Catesby Hall and celebrating mass, which in consequence of the policy of the Church of Rome, were made penal offences. From 1570 to 1600 the queen and the Protestant religion were constantly exposed to the machinations of the active partisans of the Roman See, who were encouraged by the pope himself. Every pontiff pursued the same course; there was a settled purpose at Rome, if not throughout the entire Roman confederacy, to dethrone Elizabeth and overturn the Anglican Church. To root out heresy by any means within their reach was deemed to be a sacred duty incumbent on all true Catholics. The son and successor of this Sir William Catesby was Robert Catesby, the conspirator, who had severely suffered in Elizabeth's reign under the penal statutes, and in revenge had engaged in many plots against the crown. He took an active part in Essex's rebellion, along with his cousin Tresham, and suffered imprisonment with him in Wisbeach Castle in 1558. Subsequently Catesby endeavoured to bring about an invasion of England by the Spaniards. In his communications with Spain he was aided and abetted by Sir Francis Tresham, another of the conspirators. The death of Elizabeth (on the eve of Lady Day, 1603) overthrew the project of an invasion. A fresh attempt somewhat later ended equally fruitless. These failures, and the disappointment of their hopes in the tolerance of James I, drove the conspirators close to despair. Then in 1604 the idea occurred to Catesby of a general destruction of Parliament. He confided his scheme to Thomas Winter, the younger son of a small Worcestershire squire, and to John Wright, a fencing master. Thomas Winter was despatched, in furtherance of the plot, into the Low Countries, where he met with, and secured the services of Guy (aka Guido) Fawkes. Fawkes was a native of Yorkshire, and a schoolfellow of Bishop Morton at York. In the Ashmolean Museum, at Oxford, are preserved the rusty and shattered remains of the lantern that Fawkes carried when he was seized. On a brass plate fixed to one side of it is a Latin inscription to that effect, with the addition that it was given to the University in 1641 by Robert Heywood, Proctor of the University. Fawkes appears to have been a soldier of fortune in the Spanish service, and a mere hired servant of the rest of the conspirators, who were nearly all gentlemen of property. During Winter's absence Catesby had not been idle: he had secured a house adjacent to the Houses of Parliament in the name of Thomas Percy, who had married Wright's sister, and was in the service of the Earl of Northumberland; from this house it was intended to dig a mine under the House of Lords. A second house was then taken, at Catesby's suggestion, in Lambeth, and placed under the charge of Robert Keyes, another conspirator. But in February 1605, when Parliament was to have met, they were able to hire the cellar under the House of Lords, and so the mine, which had been steadily progressing, was discontinued. The meeting of Parliament, however, was postponed until October. Meanwhile John Grant, Robert Winter, and Thomas Bates, Catesby's servant, had been added to the confederacy. By May all the preparations were made, the powder stored, and everything so arranged as to make the place look like a store-room. But again it was resolved to prolong Parliament, and the conspirators were afraid some discovery had been made; but one of the conspirators making it his business to be present at the ceremony of prorogation, discovered, by the demeanour of the Lords Commissioners, that they knew nothing of the plot. Their fears having been allayed, the conspirators resolved to invite several other gentlemen of means to join them, with a view to their helping to defray the expenses of the rising that was to follow the destruction of Parliament. In pursuance of this resolution, Sir Francis Tresham, Sir Everard Digby, and Ambrose Rookwood, were drawn into the conspiracy and sworn to secrecy. Sir Frances Tresham had, by the death of his father in the autumn of 1605, just become owner of the Rushton estate, and was in consequence able to offer two thousand pounds towards the purposes of the plot. The money thus obtained, or promised, was used in the purchase of arms etc. for the rising. Sir Edward Digby's estates were in Rutland, and there, when the time arrived, was to be a grand gathering as for a hunt. The discovery of the plot was ostensibly by a note to Lord Mounteagle, brother-in-law of Tresham, but also apparently by a previous communication to the Government. It is now generally believed that Tresham was the betrayer; although some believe Mrs. Abingdon of Hendlip Hall, Worcestershire was the writer of the letter to Lord Mounteagle. He was in Northamptonshire when the letter was delivered, but meeting Catesby and others soon after, he advanced them money, and urged them to leave the country as all was known. They would not believe, however, that the plot was discovered, because no search had been instituted, and thus they lost the ten days between the delivery of the note and the meeting of Parliament. Only when the official visit had been made to the cellar by the Lord Chamberlain did the conspirators resolve on flight. Then, headed by Catesby, they made for Ashby St. Ledgers, where they arrived at six o'clock in the evening, as Lady Catesby and her guests were about to sit down to supper. The old hall supplied them with arms; equipped with which, and accompanied by several gentlemen who were waiting for them at Ashby, they rode hotly to Dunchurch. There they found a large company assembled, but it became suddenly and considerably less when they heard the disastrous news that the arch-conspirators brought from London. They were now put to their last shift. Gathering as large a force as they could, they made for Wales, thinking to get the Catholic gentry to join them. Instead of receiving any increase however, their numbers were daily reduced by desertion. Driven to desperation by these disappointments and by the close pursuit of the sheriff, they at last determined to make a stand and fight for it, at Stephen Littleton's house at Holbeach, Worcestershire. Four of the chief conspirators were killed there, including Catesby. Bates, a Northamptonshire man, was taken next day in Shropshire, and was subsequently hanged. Fawkes' examination took place on the 7th of November, yet Tresham's name was not mentioned in the proclamation issued the same day for the apprehension of the conspirators. He was, however, arrested and committed to the Tower on the 12th of the same month and examined by the Council. He died in the Tower on the 23rd of December. Lord Mounteagle, to whom the letter betraying the plot was sent, was rewarded by a grant of Crown lands and a pension for life; while Lord Stourton, another brother-in-law, was condemned in the Star Chamber to a fine of six thousand marks on suspicion of participation in the plot. Alan Bale Crick History Society.
Recommended publications
  • Bonfire Night
    Bonfire Night What Is Bonfire Night? Bonfire Night remembers the failed attempt to kill the King of England and the important people of England as they gathered for the State Opening of Parliament on 5th November 1605. Bonfires were lit that first night in a joyful celebration of the King being saved. As the years went by, the burning of straw dummies representing Guy Fawkes was a reminder that traitors would never successfully overthrow a king. The Gunpowder Plot After Queen Elizabeth I died in 1603, the English Catholics were led to believe that the Act of terrorism: new King, James I, would be more accepting Deliberate attempt to kill of them. However, he was no more welcoming or injure many innocent of Catholic people than the previous ruler people for religious or which led some people to wish he was off the political gain. throne to allow a Catholic to rule the country. A small group of Catholic men met to discuss what could be done and their leader, Robert Catesby, was keen to take violent action. Their plan was to blow up the Houses of Parliament, killing many important people who they did not agree with. This was an act of terrorism. They planned to kill all of the leaders who were making life difficult for the Catholic people. They recruited a further eight men to help with the plot but as it took form, some of the group realised that many innocent people would be killed, including some who supported the Catholic people. This led some of the men to begin to have doubts about the whole plot.
    [Show full text]
  • Lawshall Neighbourhood Plan 2016-2036
    LAWSHALL NEIGHBOURHOOD PLAN 2016-2036 Submission Plan January 2017 Youth Club Collage of Lawshall buildings – unveiled at 1st Community Consultation Nov 2015 Lawshall Parish Council Loving our village – past, present, future! CONTENTS PART ONE Why a Neighbourhood Plan for Lawshall?................................................................... 1-15 LAWSHALL at a glance....................................................................................................................... 1 1. LAWSHALL present…………………………………………………………………………………………………………………….. 3 2. LAWSHALL past………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………….. 5 3. Why a Neighbourhood Plan for Lawshall? ……………………………………………………………………………….… 6 4. How we did it......……………………………………………………………………………………………………………………….. 6 5. KEY ISSUES……………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………….… 10 6. CONTEXT from National & Local Planning Policy……………………………………………………………………..... 12 7. LAWSHALL future…………………………………………………………………………………………………………………….... 13 PART TWO – Components of the Plan…………………………………………………………………….……………… 16-54 8. SETTLEMENT PATTERN & SPATIAL POLICY………………………………………………………………………………... 16 9. HOUSING development………………………………………………………………………………………………………….... 22 10. OUR NATURAL ENVIRONMENT…………………………………………………………………………………………….…. 29 11. OUR BUILT HERITAGE & DESIGN....……………………………………………………………………………………….... 38 12. OUR AMENITIES & SERVICES………………………………………………………………………………………............. 45 13. OUR INFRASTRUCTURE & BUSINESSES……………………………………………………………………………………. 48 14. IMPLEMENTATION and MONITORING…………………………………………………………………………………….
    [Show full text]
  • Chairman's Notes
    NEWSLETTER Dunstable District Local History Society No. 46 August 2016 Chairman’s Notes ita Swift’s book, Dunstable Time- the extra information which is emerging all Rline, has now been published by the the time. That’s the joy of small-circulation history society. I hope by now you have publications produced on computers. all bought a copy! TERRY OLIVER The Timeline has grown like Topsy over the Sad to report the death of Terry Oliver, chair- past six or seven years. It started when we man of the Caddington History Society, who decided to create a website for the society, and has given talks at our meetings on a number it was felt that a Timeline of the town should of occasions. Terry was intensely interested be a feature of this. in the events surrounding the two World Rita undertook to assemble whatever dated Wars and had accumulated a number of events we could find, using as a base the list files about the local members of the armed provided in Worthington Smith’s history forces who took part. These included the of Dunstable, and then adding dates from a paperwork created when Dunstable Rotary variety of other sources. Club, of which he was a member, had helped Needless to say, when the Timeline went assemble the lists of names honoured on public on the website we received lots of com- Dunstable’s War Memorial. ments, mainly from people whose particular Terry passed this material on to the Dunsta- interests had been overlooked. No problem One soldier commemorated on the Grammar ble History Society and the newest member about solving this on an internet site…we School war memorial is ‘Teddy’ Thring, only son of the school’s headmaster, who died in 1917 while of our committee, David Underwood, has could easily add extra information whenever it serving in the army.
    [Show full text]
  • The Gunpowder Plot Activity Pack
    TTHHEE GGUUNNPPOOWWDDEERR PPLLOOTT The Gunpowder Plot Activity Pack Welcome to Heritage Doncaster’s the Gunpowder Plot activity pack. This booklet is filled with ideas that you can have a go at as a family at home whilst learning about the Gunpowder Plot. Some of these activities will require adult supervision as they require using an oven, a sharp implement, or could just be a bit tricky these have been marked with this warning triangle. We would love to see what you create so why not share your photos with us on social media or email You can find us at @doncastermuseum @DoncasterMuseum [email protected] Have Fun! Heritage Doncaster Education Service Contents What was the Gunpower Plot? Page 3 The Plotters Page 4 Plotters Top Trumps Page 5-6 Remember, remember Page 7 Acrostic poem Page 8 Tunnels Page 9 Build a tunnel Page 10 Mysterious letter Page 11 Letter writing Page 12 Escape and capture Page 13 Wanted! Page 14 Create a boardgame Page 15 Guy Fawkes Night Page 16 Firework art Page 17-18 Rocket experiment Page 19 Penny for a Guy Page 20 Sew your own Guy Page 21 Traditional Bonfire Night food Page 22 Chocolate covered apples Page 23 Wordsearch Page 24 What was the Gunpowder Plot? The Gunpowder Plot was a plan made by thirteen men to blow up the Houses of Parliament when King James I was inside. The Houses of Parliament is an important building in London where the government meet. It is made up of the House of Lords and the House of Commons.
    [Show full text]
  • Speakers of the House of Commons
    Parliamentary Information List BRIEFING PAPER 04637a 21 August 2015 Speakers of the House of Commons Speaker Date Constituency Notes Peter de Montfort 1258 − William Trussell 1327 − Appeared as joint spokesman of Lords and Commons. Styled 'Procurator' Henry Beaumont 1332 (Mar) − Appeared as joint spokesman of Lords and Commons. Sir Geoffrey Le Scrope 1332 (Sep) − Appeared as joint spokesman of Lords and Commons. Probably Chief Justice. William Trussell 1340 − William Trussell 1343 − Appeared for the Commons alone. William de Thorpe 1347-1348 − Probably Chief Justice. Baron of the Exchequer, 1352. William de Shareshull 1351-1352 − Probably Chief Justice. Sir Henry Green 1361-1363¹ − Doubtful if he acted as Speaker. All of the above were Presiding Officers rather than Speakers Sir Peter de la Mare 1376 − Sir Thomas Hungerford 1377 (Jan-Mar) Wiltshire The first to be designated Speaker. Sir Peter de la Mare 1377 (Oct-Nov) Herefordshire Sir James Pickering 1378 (Oct-Nov) Westmorland Sir John Guildesborough 1380 Essex Sir Richard Waldegrave 1381-1382 Suffolk Sir James Pickering 1383-1390 Yorkshire During these years the records are defective and this Speaker's service might not have been unbroken. Sir John Bussy 1394-1398 Lincolnshire Beheaded 1399 Sir John Cheyne 1399 (Oct) Gloucestershire Resigned after only two days in office. John Dorewood 1399 (Oct-Nov) Essex Possibly the first lawyer to become Speaker. Sir Arnold Savage 1401(Jan-Mar) Kent Sir Henry Redford 1402 (Oct-Nov) Lincolnshire Sir Arnold Savage 1404 (Jan-Apr) Kent Sir William Sturmy 1404 (Oct-Nov) Devonshire Or Esturmy Sir John Tiptoft 1406 Huntingdonshire Created Baron Tiptoft, 1426.
    [Show full text]
  • Premises, Sites Etc Within 30 Miles of Harrington Museum Used for Military Purposes in the 20Th Century
    Premises, Sites etc within 30 miles of Harrington Museum used for Military Purposes in the 20th Century The following listing attempts to identify those premises and sites that were used for military purposes during the 20th Century. The listing is very much a works in progress document so if you are aware of any other sites or premises within 30 miles of Harrington, Northamptonshire, then we would very much appreciate receiving details of them. Similarly if you spot any errors, or have further information on those premises/sites that are listed then we would be pleased to hear from you. Please use the reporting sheets at the end of this document and send or email to the Carpetbagger Aviation Museum, Sunnyvale Farm, Harrington, Northampton, NN6 9PF, [email protected] We hope that you find this document of interest. Village/ Town Name of Location / Address Distance to Period used Use Premises Museum Abthorpe SP 646 464 34.8 km World War 2 ANTI AIRCRAFT SEARCHLIGHT BATTERY Northamptonshire The site of a World War II searchlight battery. The site is known to have had a generator and Nissen huts. It was probably constructed between 1939 and 1945 but the site had been destroyed by the time of the Defence of Britain survey. Ailsworth Manor House Cambridgeshire World War 2 HOME GUARD STORE A Company of the 2nd (Peterborough) Battalion Northamptonshire Home Guard used two rooms and a cellar for a company store at the Manor House at Ailsworth Alconbury RAF Alconbury TL 211 767 44.3 km 1938 - 1995 AIRFIELD Huntingdonshire It was previously named 'RAF Abbots Ripton' from 1938 to 9 September 1942 while under RAF Bomber Command control.
    [Show full text]
  • The Gunpowder Plot: Terror and Faith in 1605 PDF Book
    THE GUNPOWDER PLOT: TERROR AND FAITH IN 1605 PDF, EPUB, EBOOK Antonia Fraser | 448 pages | 01 Feb 2003 | Orion Publishing Co | 9780753814017 | English | London, United Kingdom The Gunpowder Plot: Terror and Faith in 1605 PDF Book Before he died Tresham had also told of Garnet's involvement with the mission to Spain, but in his last hours he retracted some of these statements. The King insisted that a more thorough search be undertaken. Thomas Wintour begged to be hanged for himself and his brother, so that his brother might be spared. Thomas Wintour and Littleton, on their way from Huddington to Holbeche House, were told by a messenger that Catesby had died. Details of the assassination attempt were allegedly known by the principal Jesuit of England, Father Henry Garnet. Synopsis About this title With a narrative that grips the reader like a detective story, Antonia Fraser brings the characters and events of the Gunpowder Plot to life. Seven of the prisoners were taken from the Tower to the Star Chamber by barge. As news of "John Johnson's" arrest spread among the plotters still in London, most fled northwest, along Watling Street. Seller Inventory aa2a43fc1e57f0bdf. At first glance, it might seem a little odd that I am reading a book so closely connected with November and Bonfire Night at the beginning of August. He also spoke of a Christian union and reiterated his desire to avoid religious persecution. Macbeth , Act 2 Scene 3. This is a complex story, with many players, both high and low, but Fraser lays it out clearly and concisely.
    [Show full text]
  • A MEDIEVAL BOOK and EARLY-MODERN LAW: BRACTON's AUTHORITY and APPLICATION in the COMMON LAW C.1550-1640 Ian Williams*, 
    Williams, A Medieval Book A MEDIEVAL BOOK AND EARLY-MODERN LAW: BRACTON'S AUTHORITY AND APPLICATION IN THE COMMON LAW c.1550-1640 Ian Williams*, The thirteenth-century book known as Bracton was first printed in 1569, fifteen years after Glanvill and three decades after Britton1. Despite its relatively late arrival into the list of printed common law books, of all the older common-law books it is Bracton which has tended to occupy the interest of historians. In no small part, this is due to Edward Coke’s later use of Bracton in disputes with James I2. However, much less interest is shown in Bracton’s use in early-modern England more generally, certainly compared to Bracton’s use as a source for thirteenth century law3. This article seeks to correct that imbalance by showing that Bracton was an important source for some early-modern common lawyers, particularly in certain fields. There were a number of impediments to the use of Bracton in the early-modern common law which may have inhibited its reception. The most recent work has suggested that Bracton’s popularity in early-modern England stemmed from Coke’s popularisation of the book by his references to it in his Reports4. In fact, some of the impediments to Bracton’s use were overcome, or overlooked, in the sixteenth and early-seventeenth centuries. Bracton came to have an assured place in the common-law canon even before Coke’s use of the text, although it never became a standard reference work. * Lecturer, University College London; Faculty of Laws, Bentham House, Endsleigh Gardens, London WC1H 0EG, UK; [email protected].
    [Show full text]
  • GUNPOWDER, GARDENS and GHOST by MICHAEL HANSON
    ------- - ----------------------------------~-------------------------------------------- 104 COUNTRY LIFE--APRIL 2, 1987 THE ESTATE MARKET GUNPOWDER, GARDENS AND GHOST By MICHAEL HANSON (Left) 1-ASHBY ST LEDGERS, NEAR DAVENTRY, NOR­ THAMPTONSHIRE. The original stone hall added by Lutyens in 1909-10, seen here in a 1951 COUNTRY LIFE photograph, had a floor inserted in about 1968, and service rooms created at the lower level (Right) 2-THE UPPER LEVEL OF THE HALL TODAY. "The open timber roof now seems overwhelmingly heavy" and an upper dining room is superfluous N E of the most historic manor houses a brass to him and his wife in the chancel. In his fines imposed on him in 1601 for supporting in England, Ashby St Ledgers in will, made on the day he died, he instructed his the uprising of Robert, Earl of Essex, once O Northamptonshire, has just been wife to restore to its rightful owners all the land Elizabeth l's favourite, he was forced to sell placed on the market through the London he had wrongfully purchased, and divided the the Chastleton estate in Oxfordshire, which he office of Hampton and Sons. Not only does it rest of his property between their children. His had inherited from his grandmother in 1593. have links with the Gunpowder Plot, but it was estate was attainted by virtue of his treason, but Robert Catesby (whose wife had died at extensively altered and extended earlier this Henry VII reversed the attainder in favour of his Chastleton) moved to Ashby St Ledgers to live century by Sir Edwin Lutyens, who laid out the son George, and over the next century the with his widowed mother, whose husband had magnificent gardens (and once claimed that the family prospered.
    [Show full text]
  • University of Southampton Research Repository Eprints Soton
    University of Southampton Research Repository ePrints Soton Copyright © and Moral Rights for this thesis are retained by the author and/or other copyright owners. A copy can be downloaded for personal non-commercial research or study, without prior permission or charge. This thesis cannot be reproduced or quoted extensively from without first obtaining permission in writing from the copyright holder/s. The content must not be changed in any way or sold commercially in any format or medium without the formal permission of the copyright holders. When referring to this work, full bibliographic details including the author, title, awarding institution and date of the thesis must be given e.g. AUTHOR (year of submission) "Full thesis title", University of Southampton, name of the University School or Department, PhD Thesis, pagination http://eprints.soton.ac.uk i UNIVERSITY OF SOUTHAMPTON FACULTY OF HUMANITIES School of History The Wydeviles 1066-1503 A Re-assessment by Lynda J. Pidgeon Thesis for the degree of Doctor of Philosophy 15 December 2011 ii iii ABSTRACT Who were the Wydeviles? The family arrived with the Conqueror in 1066. As followers in the Conqueror’s army the Wydeviles rose through service with the Mowbray family. If we accept the definition given by Crouch and Turner for a brief period of time the Wydeviles qualified as barons in the twelfth century. This position was not maintained. By the thirteenth century the family had split into two distinct branches. The senior line settled in Yorkshire while the junior branch settled in Northamptonshire. The junior branch of the family gradually rose to prominence in the county through service as escheator, sheriff and knight of the shire.
    [Show full text]
  • Launde Priory 1
    21 MAY 2018 LAUNDE PRIORY 1 actswilliam2henry1.wordpress.com Release date Version notes Who Current version: H1-Launde-2018-1 21/5/2018 Original version DXC Previous versions: — — — — This text is made available through the Creative Commons Attribution- NonCommercial-NoDerivs License; additional terms may apply Authors for attribution statement: Charters of William II and Henry I Project David X Carpenter, Faculty of History, University of Oxford LAUNDE PRIORY Augustinian priory of St John the Baptist County of Leicestershire : Diocese of Lincoln Founded 1121 × c. 1125 Launde priory was one of the early Augustinian houses in England, established 1120 × c. 1125. According to a narrative concerning the early years of Holy Trinity priory in Aldgate, London, known only from fifteenth-century manuscripts, Bernard prior of Dunstaple, John prior of Launde (Landa), Geoffrey de Clinton, the (king’s) chamberlain (Gaufridus camerarius de Clinton), and others named, witnessed the gift of the Cnihtengild in London to Holy Trinity in that year. It is unsurprising that the priors of two recently founded Augustinian houses should witness a gift to Holy Trinity, thought to be the first Augustinian house in England. Their names were presumably taken from a contemporary deed or other record which has not been preserved (Hodgett, Cartulary of Holy Trinity, 168, no. 871; R. R. Sharpe, Calendar of Letter Books, C, 220). The king’s confirmation of the gift, 000, Regesta 1467, also witnessed by Geoffrey de Clinton, is apparently authentic and datable 1123 × 1127, so the narrative’s date of 1125 may well be accurate. Launde priory was founded at Loddington, ‘in cuius territorio abbatia fundata est’, according to Henry II’s general confirmation of 1155 × 1158 (H2/1456).
    [Show full text]
  • The Impact of the Clandestine Marriages Act: Three Case-Studies in Conformity
    University of Warwick institutional repository: http://go.warwick.ac.uk/wrap This paper is made available online in accordance with publisher policies. Please scroll down to view the document itself. Please refer to the repository record for this item and our policy information available from the repository home page for further information. To see the final version of this paper please visit the publisher’s website. Access to the published version may require a subscription. Author(s): REBECCA PROBERT and LIAM D'ARCY BROWN Article Title: The impact of the Clandestine Marriages Act: three case- studies in conformity Year of publication: 2008 Link to published version: http://dx.doi.org/10.1017/S0268416008006759 Publisher statement: None Continuity and Change 23 (2), 2008, 309–330. f 2008 Cambridge University Press doi:10.1017/S0268416008006759 Printed in the United Kingdom The impact of the Clandestine Marriages Act: three case-studies in conformity REBECCA PROBERT* AND LIAM D’ARCY BROWN# ABSTRACT. This article examines the extent of compliance with the Clandestine Marriages Act 1753 through three parish studies. It demonstrates that the vast majority of the sample cohort of parents whose children were baptized in church, and indeed of couples living together, had married in church as required by the 1753 Act, and shows how the proportion of marriages traced rises as more information about the parties becomes available. Through a study of settlement examinations, the article posits an explanation of why some marriages have not been traced, and argues that researchers should be cautious in inferring non-compliance from the absence of a record in a specific parish.
    [Show full text]