DOCSLIB.ORG

Rossmoyne Historic Resources Survey

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Rossmoyne Historic Resources Survey Rossmoyne Historic Resources Survey City of Glendale, California Prepared for: City of Glendale 633 East Broadway, Room 103 Glendale, California 91206 Prepared by: Tanya Rathbun Sorrell, M.A. LSA Associates, Inc. 1500 Iowa Avenue, Suite 200 Riverside, California 92507 LSA Project No. CGD1101 September 6, 2011 This Page Intentionally Left Blank Table of Contents EXECUTIVE SUMMARY............................................................ 1 I. PROJECT DESCRIPTION AND METHODOLOGY ............................ 5 ROSSMOYNE STUDY AREA.................................................... 5 MAPS ............................................................................ 7 CRITERIA FOR EVALUATION ................................................. 7 FIELDWORK .................................................................... 7 PREVIOUSLY IDENTIFIED HISTORIC RESOURCES .......................... 8 II. HISTORIC CONTEXT ........................................................... 9 INTRODUCTION................................................................ 9 DEVELOPMENT HISTORY .................................................... 10 RELEVANT HISTORICAL CONTEXTS ........................................ 22 III. PHYSICAL CHARACTER .....................................................29 INTRODUCTION............................................................... 29 NEIGHBORHOOD CHARACTER .............................................. 29 ARCHITECTURAL STYLES.................................................... 33 IV. EVALUATION AS A POTENTIAL HISTORIC DISTRICT...................39 SUMMARY STATEMENT OF SIGNIFICANCE................................. 39 DISTRICT CONTRIBUTORS AND NON-CONTRIBUTORS................... 40 LOCAL EVALUATION ......................................................... 42 NATIONAL AND CALIFORNIA REGISTER EVALUATION ................... 44 GLOSSARY.........................................................................47 BIBLIOGRAPHY ...................................................................49 CITY OF GLENDALE .......................................................... 49 LOS ANGELES COUNTY ...................................................... 49 STUDIES AND REPORTS...................................................... 49 OTHER SOURCES ............................................................. 49 APPENDIX A: Criteria for the Evaluation of Historic Resources APPENDIX B: Historic Rossmoyne Tract Maps APPENDIX C: Master Tables of Properties within the Rossmoyne Historic District APPENDIX D: Department of Parks and Recreation Forms Draft Rossmoyne Historic Resources Survey City of Glendale Prepared by LSA Associates, Inc. September 2011 This Page Intentionally Left Blank City of Glendale Draft Rossmoyne Historic Resources Survey Prepared by LSA Associates, Inc. September 2011 EXECUTIVE SUMMARY LSA Associates, Inc. (LSA) is under contract to the City of Glendale to conduct a historic resources survey of a portion of the Rossmoyne neighborhood that has been nominated by the community for designation as a Glendale Historic District. The Study Area comprises 505 assessor’s parcels in an area northeast of downtown Glendale, north of Verdugo Road, generally between Cordova Street and Royal Boulevard. The purpose of the survey was to identify, document, and evaluate the proposed Rossmoyne Historic District for eligibility for listing in the National Register of Historic Places (National Register), California Register of Historical Resources (California Register), and/or for designation as a City of Glendale Historic District. This project has been funded in part by a grant from the Los Angeles County Preservation Fund of the National Trust for Historic Preservation. In February 2011, LSA conducted background and archival research into the history and development of the Rossmoyne Neighborhood in order to develop a Historic Context Statement that was specific to the Rossmoyne neighborhood. In March 2011, LSA Architectural Historian Tanya Sorrell conducted a reconnaissance-level survey that included documentation and description of all 505 properties within the proposed district boundaries. Survey data and photographs were recorded in the Historic Architecture Inventory (HAI), a field application and database developed by LSA for field data collection. The HAI provided the team with the ability to create architectural descriptions in the field and to print Department of Parks and Recreation (DPR 523) forms. Based on the historic context statement and survey results, LSA concluded that the Rossmoyne Historic District appears eligible for the National Register under Criteria A and C at the local level because it is an excellent example of an early automobile suburb and contains a significant concentration of exceptional examples of Period Revival residences. As an early automobile suburb, the Rossmoyne Historic District significantly represents a broad pattern of development that radically transformed the Southern California landscape in the 20th century with a period of significance from 1923–1950. It is highly intact, with about 82 percent of properties in the district qualifying as contributors. For these same reasons, the Rossmoyne Historic District appears eligible for the California Register under Criteria 1 and 3, and for designation as a City of Glendale Historic District under Criteria A, B, C, F, G, and H. Draft Rossmoyne Historic Resources Survey City of Glendale Prepared by LSA Associates, Inc. September 2011 1 This Page Intentionally Left Blank City of Glendale Draft Rossmoyne Historic Resources Survey 2 Prepared by LSA Associates, Inc. September 2011 M IS TY IS LE DR H A R R G I N R G E T E O N N N B C O D CO R A R R A V C I A D K ED AR A O R E C N V O N R A A U A D R G A T T G R H V D R A D TE H DR IL ST L R C DA CE RDOVA AV R N CO O G Y F R W IC R T E AJEST D R M O E T I D S M E Y AR E N L L A P ED DR B M N C R E E L N E RM R A R E O C B I N N S Y Y A L I C U T A V R R E BL O A O D D N D L P R D C A C R T N R R R V R D A A A A K A D D R S A LO S B E I A V N N T O SI R D R R R D O S L C I R L S E AV T O S L T N D E E O Y R L O E H O DR SM TO DR PR S ARB D S I IN E YD RO L C E R ** L * C N N * R * O T S R E T S O C G SM O R D R F R O O T D R LE YNE A A O V R P L N NO UEB AD A E K E S R V * O S D * M D B M CO E ** R L CO D OS N O V RTE DR R * D Z O R O N I T S U D A AV M U COR OV T R N R D P S R AIN ST R E O T NT D N A U E R A - O O R A I M 1 N N C E R RE - IS S MO F 3 E T 01 337.5 675 V I R 4 A 3 Y L Figure 2: General Location 4 4 W FEET W L DR A SOURCE: County of Los Angeles (2009); LSA (2011) R S S E E Y R D A E M I:\CGD1101\GIS\Historic_District_8x11.mxd (9/20/2011) E PORTOLA V O T D O N F E X H Y C L E O L M X E E I A L A O O T T D A N N S O N L I D R T T M T R A Z C 8 B E E E J A L A 8 L O O S D V N G U O O D A S D LEGEND J L E N M E E T A D E H E T * N GLENDALE AV L R O R D M N D * ST A * D R * O O R I N T N R * G ETHEL S A ETHEL ST N LE N S K T D A T S S L E Contributor E A R V B E Non-Contributor GO C L U I N ADAM R S V D Y Y V S R T E C None D V E R L N ProposedD Rossmoyne Historic District E N T D V R E U R DUG R O RD A A D O R F UG R ERD W V Note: A list of properties within the N districtY sorted by address is located in the report appendices. L P ETBRIAR DR G ER EDIN WE AL D BURG S O R H G UG L R D N O ER V V P E E N R P R L D I K N C NOA A I VA V SYL I P V S O N I LE TA A N G D R D O WOODBUR R Y Y A R K D T E AVON R O L A UTO K R N N TE D R DR ON NY CA This Page Intentionally Left Blank City of Glendale Draft Rossmoyne Historic Resources Survey 4 Prepared by LSA Associates, Inc. September 2011 I. PROJECT DESCRIPTION AND METHODOLOGY LSA Associates, Inc is under contract to the City of Glendale (City) to survey and evaluate a residential area in northeast Glendale known generally as Rossmoyne (Study Area) in order to determine its potential eligibility for listing in the National Register of Historic Places (National Register) the California Register of Historical Resources (California Register), and for the Glendale Register as a historic district. This historic resources survey was prepared pursuant to standard methodology and practices developed by the California State Office of Historic Preservation (OHP) and the National Parks Service (NPS), as well as standards established by the City’s own Historic Preservation Program. LSA performed the following tasks as part of the survey methodology: • Reviewed previously developed historic context statements and historic resources surveys for background information and relevant context narrative. • Developed a historic context statement for the Study Area through building upon previously prepared context statements. • Reviewed additional archival information and applicable contexts related to the Study Area. • Conducted a windshield survey of the Study Area and surrounding area to understand its immediate setting, layout, streetscape, architectural styles, and general integrity relative to adjacent neighborhoods. • Surveyed every residence in the Study Area boundaries, preparing architectural descriptions, noting alterations, and documenting with digital photographs.
Load more

Recommended publications
  • Historic-Cultural Monument (HCM) List City Declared Monuments
    Historic-Cultural Monument (HCM) List City Declared Monuments No. Name Address CHC No. CF No. Adopted Community Plan Area CD Notes 1 Leonis Adobe 23537 Calabasas Road 08/06/1962 Canoga Park - Winnetka - 3 Woodland Hills - West Hills 2 Bolton Hall 10116 Commerce Avenue & 7157 08/06/1962 Sunland - Tujunga - Lake View 7 Valmont Street Terrace - Shadow Hills - East La Tuna Canyon 3 Plaza Church 535 North Main Street and 100-110 08/06/1962 Central City 14 La Iglesia de Nuestra Cesar Chavez Avenue Señora la Reina de Los Angeles (The Church of Our Lady the Queen of Angels) 4 Angel's Flight 4th Street & Hill Street 08/06/1962 Central City 14 Dismantled May 1969; Moved to Hill Street between 3rd Street and 4th Street, February 1996 5 The Salt Box 339 South Bunker Hill Avenue (Now 08/06/1962 Central City 14 Moved from 339 Hope Street) South Bunker Hill Avenue (now Hope Street) to Heritage Square; destroyed by fire 1969 6 Bradbury Building 300-310 South Broadway and 216- 09/21/1962 Central City 14 224 West 3rd Street 7 Romulo Pico Adobe (Rancho 10940 North Sepulveda Boulevard 09/21/1962 Mission Hills - Panorama City - 7 Romulo) North Hills 8 Foy House 1335-1341 1/2 Carroll Avenue 09/21/1962 Silver Lake - Echo Park - 1 Elysian Valley 9 Shadow Ranch House 22633 Vanowen Street 11/02/1962 Canoga Park - Winnetka - 12 Woodland Hills - West Hills 10 Eagle Rock Eagle Rock View Drive, North 11/16/1962 Northeast Los Angeles 14 Figueroa (Terminus), 72-77 Patrician Way, and 7650-7694 Scholl Canyon Road 11 The Rochester (West Temple 1012 West Temple Street 01/04/1963 Westlake 1 Demolished February Apartments) 14, 1979 12 Hollyhock House 4800 Hollywood Boulevard 01/04/1963 Hollywood 13 13 Rocha House 2400 Shenandoah Street 01/28/1963 West Adams - Baldwin Hills - 10 Leimert City of Los Angeles May 5, 2021 Page 1 of 60 Department of City Planning No.
    [Show full text]
  • Bow Tie Yard Lofts Project Initial Study
    City of Los Angeles Department of City Planning Major Projects & Environmental Analysis Section City Hall 200 N. Spring Street, Room 750 Los Angeles, CA 90012 INITIAL STUDY Northeast Los Angeles Community Plan Area Bow Tie Yard Lofts Project Case Number: ENV-2016-2862-EIR Project Location: 2750-2800 W. Casitas Avenue, Los Angeles, California 90039 Council District: 1, Gilbert A. Cedillo Project Description: The Applicant proposes the development of a mixed-use project in the Northeast Los Angeles Community Plan area that would consist of five buildings with a total of 419 multi-family residential units (approximately 423,872 square feet) and approximately 64,000 square feet of commercial space. The 5.7-acre Project Site is located at the terminus of Casitas Avenue in Glassell Park in Northeast Los Angeles. The Los Angeles River is adjacent to the Project Site’s southern boundary line, and the Glendale Freeway (SR-2) is located to the north and west of the Project Site. The existing zoning designation of the Project Site is [Q]PF-1-CDO-RIO. Existing on-site uses, including a light manufacturing/warehouse/film production building (approximately 117,000 square feet) and its associated surface parking, would be demolished as part of the Proposed Project. The proposed residential units would include a combination of 119 studios, 220 one-bedroom, and 80 two-bedroom units in four buildings ranging from five to six stories (60 to 81 feet above grade). Eleven percent of the base-density residential units (approximately 35 units) would be reserved as Very Low Income Units.
    [Show full text]
  • Black, Brown, and Over-Policed in L.A. Schools
    Black, Brown, and Over-Policed in L.A. Schools: Structural Proposals to End the School-to-Prison Pipeline in the Los Angeles Unified School District and to Build a National Movement to Stop the Mass Incarceration of Black and Latino Communities A report by Community Rights Campaign of the Labor/Community Strategy Center October 2013 Black, Brown and Over-Policed in LA Schools Structural Proposals to End the School-to-Prison Pipeline in the Los Angeles Unified School District and to Build a National Movement to Stop the Mass Incarceration of Black and Latino Communities. About the authors The Community Rights Campaign is a project of the The Community Rights Campaign’s grassroots Labor/Community Strategy Center. The Community organizing model is led by Haewon Asfaw, Carlos Rights Campaign’s lead organizers are Manuel “Elmo” Gomez, Carla Gonzalez, and Melissa “Mello” Criollo, Ashley Franklin, and Barbara Lott-Holland. Lemus. We are leading a long-term campaign to challenge While we take sole responsibility for this report and suppressive, pre-prison conditions in Los Angeles any errors it may contain, we want to acknowledge public schools. We believe it is parents, teachers, and all the organizations who are helping to build a students—not police, tickets, and courts—who will lead movement to end the school-to-prison pipeline, many the way to transforming our schools. of whom are named herein. Since our launch in 2007, the Community Rights Thank you to the hundreds of young people, Campaign has built a grassroots civil and human parents, teachers, organizers and leaders who are the rights movement of youth, teachers, parents, and Community Rights Campaign.
    [Show full text]
  • The 2014 Bisexual/Pansexual/Fluid Community Needs Assessment of Greater Los Angeles
    The 2014 Bisexual/Pansexual/Fluid Community Needs Assessment of Greater Los Angeles Publisher: Los Angeles Bi Task Force Los Angeles, California Principle Investigator: Mimi Hoang, Ph.D., www.drmimihoang.com Published By: Los Angeles Bi Task Force, Los Angeles, California, March 2015 Special Thanks To: Cadyn Cathers, M.A. Royanna Lecuyer-Mangel, M.A. Lori Way, M.A. Tara Avery Yazmin Monet Watkins Anais Plasketes, M.A. Robert Ozn Curt Duffy William Burleson Lauren Beach Dr. Herukhuti Kathleen Sullivan, Ph.D. Ian lawrence Mike Szymanski Eunice Gonzalez ____________________________________________________________________________ LABTF is a non-profit that promotes education, advocacy, and cultural enrichment for the bisexual, pansexual, and fluid communities in Greater LA. 1 Table of Contents Introduction........................................................................................................ ........................... 3 History of Greater Los Angeles Bisexual Communities............................................................... .. 3 Goal of This Assessment............................................................................................................. 4 Methods……................................................................................................................................ 4 Summary of Findings.................................................................................................................... 5 Demographics ....................................................................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • Pre-Consolidation Communities of Los Angeles, 1862-1932
    LOS ANGELES CITYWIDE HISTORIC CONTEXT STATEMENT Context: Pre-Consolidation Communities of Los Angeles, 1862-1932 Prepared for: City of Los Angeles Department of City Planning Office of Historic Resources July 2016 TABLE OF CONTENTS PREFACE 1 CONTRIBUTOR 1 INTRODUCTION 1 THEME: WILMINGTON, 1862-1909 4 THEME: SAN PEDRO, 1882-1909 30 THEME: HOLLYWOOD, 1887-1910 56 THEME: SAWTELLE, 1896-1918 82 THEME: EAGLE ROCK, 1886-1923 108 THEME: HYDE PARK, 1887-1923 135 THEME: VENICE, 1901-1925 150 THEME: WATTS, 1902-1926 179 THEME: BARNES CITY, 1919-1926 202 THEME: TUJUNGA, 1888-1932 206 SELECTED BIBLIOGRAPY 232 SurveyLA Citywide Historic Context Statement Pre-consolidation Communities of Los Angeles, 1862-1932 PREFACE This historic context is a component of Los Angeles’ citywide historic context statement and provides guidance to field surveyors in identifying and evaluating potential historic resources relating to Pre- Consolidation Communities of Los Angeles. Refer to www.HistoricPlacesLA.org for information on designated resources associated with this context as well as those identified through SurveyLA and other surveys. CONTRIBUTOR Daniel Prosser is a historian and preservation architect. He holds an M.Arch. from Ohio State University and a Ph.D. in history from Northwestern University. Before retiring, Prosser was the Historic Sites Architect for the Kansas State Historical Society. INTRODUCTION The “Pre-Consolidation Communities of Los Angeles” context examines those communities that were at one time independent, self-governing cities. These include (presented here as themes): Wilmington, San Pedro, Hollywood, Sawtelle, Eagle Rock, Hyde Park, Venice, Watts, Barnes City, and Tujunga. This context traces the history of each of these cities (up to the point of consolidation with the City of Los Angeles), identifying important individuals and patterns of settlement and development, and then links the events and individuals to extant historic resources (individual resources and historic districts).
    [Show full text]
  • 17-Unit Small Lot Subdivision Development Opportunity in Los Angeles’ Eagle Rock Neighborhood
    4035 EAGLE ROCK BOULEVARD LOS ANGELES, CA 90065 17-unit small lot subdivision development opportunity in Los Angeles’ Eagle Rock neighborhood. CONFIDENTIALITY AND DISCLAIMER The information contained in the following Marketing Brochure is proprietary and strictly confidential. It is intended to be reviewed only by the party receiving it from Marcus & Millichap and should not be made available to any other person or entity without the written consent of Marcus & Millichap. This Marketing Brochure has been prepared to provide summary, unverified information to prospective purchasers, and to establish only a preliminary level of interest in the subject property. The information contained herein is not a substitute for a thorough due diligence investigation. Marcus & Millichap has not made any investigation, and makes no warranty or representation, with respect to the income or expenses for the subject property, the future projected financial performance of the property, the size and square footage of the property and improvements, the presence or absence of contaminating substances, PCB’s or asbestos, the compliance with State and Federal regulations, the physical condition of the improvements thereon, or the financial condition or business prospects of any tenant, or any tenant’s plans or intentions to continue its occupancy of the subject property. The information contained in this Marketing Brochure has been obtained from sources we believe to be reliable; however, Marcus & Millichap has not verified, and will not verify, any of the information contained herein, nor has Marcus & Millichap conducted any investigation regarding these matters and makes no warranty or representation whatsoever regarding the accuracy or completeness of the information provided.
    [Show full text]
  • 20) Medium Clubs (20-40) Large Clubs (41+) Award Name Small
    Rotary District 5260 2006-07 Awards Program CLUB SERVICE Small Clubs (<20) Medium Clubs (20-40) Large Clubs (41+) Antelope Valley Sunrise Bishop Sunrise Bishop Atwater Silverlake Sunrise Canoga Park Burbank Burbank Sunrise La Cañada Flintridge Glendale Calabasas Lancaster Glendale Sunrise Crescenta Valley Lancaster Sunrise Granada Hills Northeast Los Angeles Mammoth Lakes Sunrise Lancaster West Northridge/Chatsworth Mid San Fernando Valley Mammoth Lakes Palmdale North Hollywood Santa Clarita Valley Rosamond North San Fernando Valley Woodland Hills Santa Clarita Sunrise Studio City-Sherman Oaks Sun Valley Tarzana Encino Sunland-Tujunga Van Nuys Universal City-Sunrise Warner Center Award Name Small Club Winner Medium Club Winner Large Club Winner Best Overall Club Service Award Antelope Valley Sunrise Lancaster Rotary Lancaster West 2nd Place Overall Service Atwater Silverlake Sunrise Warner Center Glendale Sunrise 3rd Place Overall Service Santa Clarita Sunrise Bishop Sunrise Granada Hills Superior Avenue of Service (best single project) SCS - Hurrican Fundraiser Lancaster - Reverse raffle $12K Lancaster-W auction $50K &19 PHF 2nd Place Service Project (2nd best single project) ATS - 8 PHF Tarzana - 7 New member Granada Hills - Bowling $13K 3rd Place Service Project (3 best single project) Palmdale - Fireworks fundraiser MSFV - Local 300 - Scholarships GSR - 16 New members CinAC / Golf $12K Stand-Out Public Relations Award ASSRC - PR/Bulletin/Website Lancaster - Antelope Valley Fair Lancaster-W Lobster fest & Radio broadcast Perfect Partnership
    [Show full text]
  • Health Atlas for the City of Los Angeles
    Prevalence of Childhood Obesity by Community Plan Area (2010) ¨¦§5 Sylmar Granada Hills Health Atlas SAN Fast Food RestaurantFERNANDO Rate per 10,000 Residents June 2013 |ÿ118 Pacoima Motor Vehicle Crashes with Pedestrians and BicyclistsChatsworth Tujunga Northridge ¨¦§5 Sun Valley for the City210 of Los Angeles ¨¦§ Canoga Park Reseda Van Nuys BURBANK 5 |ÿ170 ! ¨¦§ Warner North Center Hollywood ¨¦§!!5 |ÿ2 Encino Modified Retail Food Environment Index Sylmar ! !! ! ! PASADENA !!!! £101 !!! |ÿ134! ¤ Sherman Granada ! Oaks Hills ! ! ! GLENDALE CALABASAS Studio City Universal City !! ! !! Griffith Ü Park SAN FERNANDO Ü ¨¦§405 ! ¤£66 Ü Ü ! ! ¤£101 Ü Northeast Hollywood ! Bel Air - Beverly Crest ! Los Angeles Ü 5 ! ! ! ¨¦§ ! |ÿ118 ! !! !!! !! ! ! ! !!! Sylmar ! !!! ! Ü !WEST HOLLYWOOD ! ! ! Pacoima! ! Silver Ü BEVERLY! Lake Elysian ALHAMBRA Ü !!!! !!!!! !! !!!!!!!! ! ! Granada HILLS ! Park! ! ! ! Ü Chatsworth ! ! Tujunga Ü ! ! ! ! !!! !!!!! !!!!! !! ! Hills ! ! !!!! ! UCLA!! ! ! !!! !!! !! Wilshire!! ! !!! ! ! Ü ! !! Downtown ! Koreatown Los Angeles 10 Ü ! Westwood Westlake ! ¨¦§ !! ! Ü ! !!! !!!! ! !! ! ! ! Pacific Century ! City !! !! ! ! ! Ü Palisades MONTEREY PARK !! SAN ! ! ! ! !!! ! ! ! |ÿ1 ! !!!!!!! Sylmar! FERNANDO SANTA!!! ! Boyle ! Northridge! |ÿ60 ! MONICA ! Heights !! ! !! !!! !!! ! !! ! ! ! ! Granada! ! ! 10 West Adams ! !! ! ! ! ! ¨¦§ ! Ü ! ! ! !!! Ü Ü Hills ! ! ! USC ! ! ! ! !! ! !!! ! !! ! ! Ü Ü Ü ! Palms/ ! ! ! !! !! !! ! Mar Vista/ ! Sun Valley Ü Ü ! CULVER Lemert ! ! ÿ118 Ü Del Rey! Baldwin !! Southeast ! 5 | CITY ! Park
    [Show full text]
  • COMMUNITY RESOURCE GUIDE for Families/Caregivers of Children Ages 0-5
    COMMUNITY RESOURCE GUIDE for Families/Caregivers of Children Ages 0-5 Serving the communities of: Eagle Rock, Highland Park, Garvanza, Glassell Park, Mt. Washington, & Cypress Park Revised Jun 2016 Funded by First 5 LA. INTRODUCTION Choose Health LA Kids is a partnership between the Los Angeles County Department of Public Health and 20 funded agencies throughout LA County working towards reducing childhood obesity among children ages 0-5. Funded by First 5 LA, Choose Health LA Kids’ funded agencies are engaging the community through a variety of activities including grocery store tours, food demonstrations, parent education, and linking community resources to families with children ages 0-5. WHAT YOU WILL FIND The Community Resource Guide for Families/Caregivers of Children Ages 0-5 is a comprehensive publication focusing on Los Angeles County. The Guide is divided into five sections: First 5 LA Resources Nutrition and Healthy Lifestyle Resources Physical Activity Resources Free/Low-Cost Resources for Pregnant/Post-Partum Women Social and Health Services Resources TABLE OF CONTENTS First 5 LA Resources ________________________________________________________________________________________________________ pg 3 Perinatal and Parent Support Nutrition and Physical Activity Oral Health Housing Best Start Early Care and Education Health Coverage and 211 LA County Vision Nutrition and Healthy Lifestyle Resources _______________________________________________________________________________ pg 7 Women, Infants and Children (WIC) Community
    [Show full text]
  • 1981 Caltrans Inventory of Pacific Electric Routes
    1981 Inventory of PACIFIC ELECTRIC ROUTES I J..,. I ~ " HE 5428 . red by I58 ANGELES - DISTRICT 7 - PUBLIC TRANSPORTATION BRANCH rI P37 c.2 " ' archive 1981 INVENTORY OF PACIFIC ELECTRIC ROUTES • PREPARED BY CALIFORNIA DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION (CALTRANS) DISTRICT 07 PUBLIC TRANSPORTATION BRANCH FEBRUARY 1982 • TABLE OF CONTENTS PAGE I. EXECUTIVE SUMMARY 1 Pacific Electric Railway Company Map 3a Inventory Map 3b II. NQR'I'HIRN AND EASTERN DISTRICTS 4 A. San Bernardino Line 6 B. Monrovia-Glendora Line 14 C. Alhambra-San Gabriel Line 19 D. Pasadena Short Line 21 E. Pasadena Oak Knoll Line 23 F. Sierra Madre Line 25 G. South Pasadena Line 27 H. North Lake Avenue Line 30 10 North Fair Oaks Avenue Line 31 J. East Colorado Street Line 32 K. Pomona-Upland Line 34 L. San Bernardino-Riverside Line 36 M. Riverside-Corona Line 41 III. WESTERN DISTRICT 45 A. Glendale-Burbank Line 47 B. Hollywood Line Segment via Hill Street 52 C. South Hollywood-Sherman Line 55 D. Subway Hollywood Line 58 i TABLE OF CONTENTS (Contd. ) -PAGE III. WESTERN DISTRICT (Conta. ) E. San Fernando valley Line 61 F. Hollywood-Venice Line 68 o. Venice Short Line 71 H. Santa Monica via Sawtelle Line 76 I. westgate Line 80 J. Santa Monica Air Line 84 K. Soldier's Home Branch Line 93 L. Redondo Beach-Del Rey Line 96 M. Inglewood Line 102 IV. SOUTHIRN DISTRICT 106 A. Long Beach Line 108 B. American Avenue-North Long Beach Line 116 c. Newport-Balboa Line 118 D. E1 Segundo Line 123 E. San Pedro via Dominguez Line 129 F.
    [Show full text]
  • Northeast Los Angeles (NELA) Hillsides Work Program
    Northeast Los Angeles (NELA) Hillsides Work Program What is the Northeast Los Angeles (NELA) Hillsides Work Program? The NELA Hillsides Work Program is the directive that resulted out of the adoption of the Interim Con- trol Ordinance (ICO) by the Los Angeles City Council in December 2006. The purpose of the NELA Hillsides Work Program is to review and assess issues such as the minimization of grading and soil erosion, protection of ridgelines and landforms, protection of plant life and wildlife, appropriate scales of hillside development, and, adequate access for residents and emergency vehicles in the Northeast Los Angeles hillside areas of Mount Olympus, Paradise Hill, Rose Hill, El Sereno, and Monterey Hills. The goals of the NELA Hillsides Work Program are to identify issues and opportunities in the hillside communities, set objectives, and develop land use regulations that promote policies and objectives of the Northeast Los Angeles Community Plan for development in the hillsides that: • are appropriate in scale and minimally disruptive of the natural terrain, vegetation, water courses and wildlife; • ensure that future developments improve the identity and appearance of neighborhoods and communities through scale, height, bulk, setbacks, design, and landscaping parameters; • give consideration for the steepness of the topography and geological stability in any proposal for development; • ensure the availability of adequate infrastructure and access to emergency services; and, • promote the protection of natural resources. Focus Group* Purpose: • The focus groups help identify the issues and opportunities related to hillside development and conservation. • The focus groups explore ways to promote good planning principles by soliciting community input that will be used to develop land use regulations which will promote appropriate development in the Northeast Los Angeles hillsides.
    [Show full text]
  • 1239 S Glendale Ave
    OFFERING MEMORANDUM 1239 S GLENDALE AVE RARE BLOCK—TO—BLOCK SITE | “GLENDALE STUDIOS” This is a confidential Offering Memorandum intended solely for your limited use and benefit in determining whether you desire to express any further interest in the purchase of 1239 S Glendale Ave, Glendale, CA (“the Property”). This Offering Memorandum was prepared by Cushman & Wakefield of California, Inc. (“Cushman & Wakefield”) and has been reviewed by representatives of the owners of The Property (“the Ownership”). It contains selected information pertaining to the Property and does not purport to be all-inclusive or to contain all of the information that prospective purchasers may desire. It should be noted that all information provided is for general reference purposes only in that such information is based on assumptions relating to the general economy, competition, and other factors beyond the control of Ownership and, therefore, is subject to material variation. Additional information and an opportunity to inspect the Property will be made available to interested and qualified prospective purchasers. Neither Ownership nor Cushman & Wakefield nor any of their respective officers have made any representation or warranty, express or implied, as to the accuracy or completeness of this Offering Memorandum, any of its contents, or any other materials provided as a courtesy to facilitate prospective purchaser’s own investigations of the Property, and no legal commitments or obligations shall arise by reason of this Offering Memorandum, its contents or any further information provided by Cushman & Wakefield regarding the Property. It is essential that all parties to real estate transactions be aware of the health, liability and economic impact of environmental factors on real estate.
    [Show full text]