DOCSLIB.ORG

GM Apology to Nader.Pdf

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
GM Apology to Nader.Pdf FEDERAL ROLE IN TRAFFIC SAFETY If~· HEARINGS FEDERAL ROLE IN TRAFFIC SAFETY ·BEFORE THE (Pursuant to S. Res. 186, 89th Cong.) SUBCOMMI'ITEE ON EXECUTIVE REORGANIZATION TUESDAY, MARCH 22, 1966 OF THE U.S. SENATE, SUBCOMMITTEE ON EXECUTIVE REOROANIZA'l'ION, COMMITTEE ON COMMITTEE ON GOVERNMENT OPERATIONS, Washington, D.O. GOVERNMENT OPERATIONS The subcommittee met, pursuant to notice, at 10 a.m., in room J:ll8, New State Office Building, Senator Abraham Ribicoff (chair­ UNITED STATES SENATE man) presiding. Present: Senators Ribicoff, Kennedy of New York, ,Jackson, Harris, EIGHTY-NINTH CONGRESS ltnd Simpson. · . Also present: Jerome Sonosky, staff director and general counsel; SECOND SESSION Philip Cook, professional staff member; Robert Wager, assistant coun­ sel; and Esther Newberg, chief clerk. TRAFFIC SAFETY: EXAMINATION AND REVIEW STATEMENT OF HON. ABRAHAM RIBICOFF, U.S. SENATOR FROM OF EFFICIENCY, ECONOMY, AND COORDINATION THE STATE OF CONNECTICUT OF PUBLIC AND PRIVATE AGENCIES' ACTIVITIES Senator RrnrcoFF. The committee will be in order. AND THE ROLE OF THE FEDERAL GOVERNMENT When the Subcommittee on Executive Reorganiaztion began its in­ quiry into the Federal role in traffic safety exactly a year ago today, we were aware that we were dealing with a controversial topic. The MARCH 22, 1966 safety of motor vehicle travel is a matter of vital concern to the Ameri­ can people as a whole, as well as to the millions whose livelihoods depend upon our transportation system and automotive industry. PART 4 As a matter of fact, currently there are 91 million registered motor vehicles in the United States, and 98 million licensed drivers. Soon aft.er the hearings began it was clear that the controversy was Printed for the use of the Cotnmittee on Government Operations likely to become more heated as old theories were subjected to scrutiny itnd established positions came under. attack. I think our inquiry has been helpful. It has shed light on important matters that have long been only dimly understood. It has shown us 1treas of controversy where we must look further for the right answers. At the same time, the hearings have quickened the determination· of experts in many quarters to make highway travel as safe as possible, as soon as possible. The hearings have resulted in the introduction of a variety of new safety :features on our new automobiles without the passage of any U.S. GOVERN!i:Ui:l\T PHINTING OF!;'ICI!i srecific legislation. Further, it has· led to a national high,vny safety bill, forwarded to this Congress by the President. 49--959 \VASHING'l'ON : 1966 Much of the subcommittee's success has resulted from the willing­ ness of experts in.this important field to express their views vigorously 1379 1380 FE·DI~·HAL HOLE l.N 'l'HAFFIC SA'FJ£'l'Y FEDF~RAL UOLE TN 'l.'H.AFFlC SAFE'l'Y 1381 and frankly. This righL to testify freely without fear or intiniidntion Lion. 1\fter tlic 'vitness has given his statement, each n1e1nber of the is one of the cornerstones of a :free and de1nocratic society. ..:-\ny at­ eornmittce jn turn will be confined to asking questions for a period tempt to jeop<irclize this right is a serious matter. of 10 minutes. After every member of the committee has had an I have called this special meeting today to look into the circum­ opportunity to ask q11estions, then those 1nembers of the committee stances surrounding whtLt appeared to be an attempt, by General Motors who may have other questions may proceed beyond the 10-minute Corp. to discredit Mr. Ralph Nader, a recent witness before the sub­ period. committee. This Iorgo company whose principal executive officers Thank you, Mr. Roche. You may proceed. appeat'cd before this same subcommittee last July, has admitted re­ sponsibility for undertaking a determined and exhaustive investiga­ TESTIMONY OF JAMES M. ROCHE, PRESIDENT, GENERAL MOTORS t10n _of a ;private citizen who has criticized the auto industry verbally CORP.; ACCOMPANIED BY THEODORE C. SORENSEN, COUNSEL and 1n print. There is no law which bars a corporation from hiring detectives to Mr. Rocim. Thank you, Mr. Chairman. investigate a private citizen, however distasteful the idea may seem to For the record, my name is James M. lfochc and I am president of so1ne of us. TI1ere is a la.w, hov-.'ever, which makes it a crime to harass General Motors Corp., Detroit, Mich. I am here today at the chair­ or intimidate a witness before a congressional committee. One of our man's invitation issued in conjunction ,yith h'is March 10 state1nent purposes here today is to inquire into the purposes and effects of the to the Senate. That statement ordered hearings concerning this cor­ action initiated by General Motors. poration's responsibility for a priv~te investigation of .Mr. R<;lph Personally, I don't like to see anyone subjected to harassment, in­ Nader, a witness before this subcomnnttee who has bc~n cnt1cal of the timidation, or character assassinrttion. But I nm particularly dis­ automobile industry's efforts on traffic safety and particularly the GM turbed when this sort of aotivity is injected into the efforts of a legisla­ Corvair. I immediately stu,ted our intention to cooperate with this tive body to deal with a vital public issue, like traffic safety. subcommittee in every possible way. I am concerned because I know that the subcommittee will never be Let me make clear at the outset tlrn.t I deplore the kind of harass­ able to complete its work successfully if witnesses believe their per­ ment to which Mr. Nader has apparently been subjected. I am just sonal lives might be investigated and their rights to privacy infringed as shocked and outraged by some of the incidents which Mr. Nader by the auto industry or other interested parties. has reported as the members of this subcommittee. This situation cannot be allowed to go unchallenged. It goes to the As president of General Motors, I hold myself fully responsible very heart ?f the legislative process. If this hearing does nothing for any action authorized or in~tiated by "1_1Y ?fficer of the corporatJ_on else toda.y, .1t should reaffirm the dght and duty of every citizen to which may have had any bearmg on the mcidents. relat~d t? our m­ speak Ins mmd on matters of public mterest and concern. vestigation of Mr. Nader. I did not know of the mvestigahon when Would yon, Senator Simpson, or Senator Harris, like to make any it wasonitiated and I did not approve it. comment! Senator SIMPSON. I haven't anything. APOLOGY TO SUBCOMMrl"TEE AND NADER Senator lIARHIS. I have no opening statement. Thank you, Mr. Chairn1an. While there can be no disagreement over General Motors' legal .right Senator RrrucoFF. The first witness is Ralph Nader. ·we will stand to ascertain necessary facts preparatory to litigatioi:, a~ I s~all discuss in recess until the 'vitness comes. in a moment, I am not here to excuse, condone, or 1ust1fy m any way (Short recess.) our investigatin/$ Mr. Nader. To the extent that General Motors Senator RrmcOFI•\ The committee will be in order. bears responsibility, I want to apologize here. and now to the members It had been my intention to call Mr. Nader as our first witness, but of this subcommittee and Mr. Nader. I sincerely hope ~hat _these ]\fr. Nader has not arrived, and it is now 10 :15. ·would you object apologies will be accepted. Certainly I bear Mr. Nader no 111 will. Mr. Roche, to giving your statement at this time j · ' To the best of my. lrnowled~e--and I h~ve made every effort to Mr. Roe.HE. I will be very happy to give my statement, Mr. Chair- obtain all the facts smce learnm~ about this some 2 weeks ago-the mun. investi~tion initiated by G~nerM Motors, contrary to. some specula­ .Senator RrmcoFF. Mr. Roche, as a matter of formality, in keening tion did not employ detectives givmg false names\ did no_t employ with the rules of the committee, may I ask yon if you wouli! be willing Alli~d Investigation, Inc., did not use recording devices du~·mg.mter­ to take an oath, please! views, did not follow Mr. Nader in Iowa and Pennsylvama, d1d n~t Will yon raise yonr right hand? have him under surveillance during the day. he testified before tlns You do solemnly swear that the testimony you shall give before this subcommittee, did not follow him in any pnvate place, a1'.d did 7fOt Senate subcommittee shall be the truth, the whole truth, and nothing constantly ring his private telephone number late at mght with but. the truth, so help you Goel? false statements or anonymous warnings. M:r. l~ocnm. I do. At the time the investigation was initiated last November, Mr. .Senn.tor R1n1cOFF. For the purposes of committee procedure, we Nader's book had not yet been published, he ha~ not app~red nor \v1ll allow each "'itness to give l1is entire state1nent 'vithout interrup- was he scheduled to appear as a witness before tlus subcommittee and )!'gDERAL JlOLE IN 'l'HAFFfC SAFE'l'Y 1383 he \\'as riot regarded to anyone's kno\v]edgc as a. consult.ant to this tion-inve~tigation of the accident, the dan1ugcs, the parties, the subcon1n1ittee. In short, this investig:itio11 \vas \Vholly unrelated to witnesses, the qualifications of experts and rehtted facts.1 the proceedings of this subcommittee and Mr. Nader's connections Troubled hy what appeared possibly to be a concerted effort on the with them.
Load more

Recommended publications
  • Tort Law Is Our Law! Catalogue
    Tort Law is Our Law! Share it for the Holidays... Winter 2018 Catalogue Holiday shopping that celebrates the Law! Tort law and trial by jury go together like the Holidays and presents. What better gift for your staff, or family and friends, than something from the American Museum of Tort Law - the Museum that celebrates the importance of trial by jury, and tort law – the branch of law that protects us all from dangerous products, and wrongful conduct. Supreme Court Justice Stephen Breyer with Rick Newman We are pleased to invite you to look inside, where you’ll find gifts for everyone - the lawyer, your ace legal staff, the would-be lawyer, or anyone who appreciates good reads, fun items, intriguing art and especially our system of law - the greatest legal system in the world. Happy Holidays, 2018! Richard L. Newman, Esq. Executive Director “The Museum... will be of vital importance to our citizenry” - Justice Sandra Day O’Connor 3 Wearables—show your support... and start an education with a conversation! Phil Donahue (right), the celebrated talk show host and an early Founder, visited the Museum and conducted an interview with Yale Law Professor Akhil Reed Amar. September 17th, 2017 An AMTL Shirt is not just clothing or a show of support, it’s a sure-fire conversation starter... What’s Tort Law? Why a flaming car? Who are Brown and Kendall? You’re going to find out once you start wearing these shirts! Museum Logo T-Shirt $20 Black and white image of the Museum, with our name in white over a teal background.
    [Show full text]
  • RALPH NADER Corporatism's Threat to Democracy Interviewed by David Barsamian Winsted, CT 27 February 2021
    RALPH NADER Corporatism's Threat to Democracy Interviewed by David Barsamian Winsted, CT 27 February 2021 Ralph Nader, a legendary figure, has spent a lifetime fighting on behalf of ordinary people. Life magazine ranked him as one of the most influential Americans of the twentieth century. The Atlantic named him one of the hundred most influential figures in U.S. history. Founder of Public Citizen, he is a long-time advocate for consumer safety and workers’ rights. He rose to fame in the 1960s when he took on General Motors and its unsafe Corvair car. His 1965 book Unsafe At Any Speed not only created a sensation but also was instrumental in the enactment of the Motor Vehicle Safety Act. His efforts helped create the Environmental Protection Agency. He has exposed the misdeeds of the corporate sector as well as of the political system. In recent years he has led the struggles around NAFTA, the WTO, corporate welfare, and single-payer health care. He is the author of numerous books including Return to Sender, Unstoppable, To the Ramparts and Breaking Through Power. He is co-author of Fake President and Wrecking America. DAVID BARSAMIAN: Welcome to the program. Agency was good. And the nominee, while not the most aggressive, certainly is far better than the predecessor. A RALPH NADER: Thank you, David. good nomination was Rohit Chopra, who comes over from the Federal Trade Commission where he was a DAVID BARSAMIAN: Biden's appointments and policy commissioner to head the Consumer Financial Protection announcements since the January 20 inauguration. What do Bureau, which regulates the credit economy, all the fraud you like and what don't you like so far? and over-billing and fee penalties and deception and all of that.
    [Show full text]
  • Higher Education Exchange
    HIGHER EDUCATION EXCHANGE 2019 Leadership and Democracy Articles Maura Casey Michaela Grenier Matthew R. Johnson William V. Muse and Carol Farquhar Nugent Mark Wilson Interviews Dennis Donovan and Harry C. Boyte Katrina S. Rogers and Keith Melville Afterword David Mathews Editors: Derek W. M. Barker and Alex Lovit Managing Editor: Joey Easton Proofreader: Ellen Dawson-Witt Formatting: Long’s Graphic Design, Inc. The Higher Education Exchange is founded on a thought articulated by Thomas Jefferson in 1820: I know no safe depository of the ultimate powers of the society but the people themselves; and if we think them not enlightened enough to exercise their control with a wholesome discretion, the remedy is not to take it from them, but to inform their discretion by education. In the tradition of Jefferson, the Higher Education Exchange agrees that a central goal of higher education is to help make democracy possible by preparing citizens for public life. The Higher Education Exchange is part of a movement to strengthen higher education’s democratic mission and foster a more democratic culture throughout American society. Working in this tradition, the Higher Education Exchange publishes case studies, analyses, news, and ideas about efforts within higher education to develop more democratic societies. The Kettering Foundation is a nonprofit operating foundation, chartered in 1927, that does not make grants but welcomes partnerships with other institutions (or groups of institutions) and individuals who are actively working on problems of communities, governing, politics, and edu- cation. The interpretations and conclusions contained in the Higher Education Exchange, unless expressly stated to the contrary, represent the views of the author or authors and not necessarily those of the foundation, its trustees, or officers.
    [Show full text]
  • For More Information Or to Arrange Interviews with Ralph Nader
    For More Information or to arrange interviews with Ralph Nader Contact: Hunter Jones or Todd Main 202-387-8034 [email protected] The National Traffic and Motor Vehicle Safety Acts – Fiftieth Anniversary (1966-2016) Nader Holds Four-Day Conference to Commemorate Fiftieth Anniversary Year of the Publication of Unsafe at Any Speed Today, September 9, 2016, marks the 50th anniversary of President Lyndon Johnson’s signing of the National Highway Traffic Safety Act, a result of Ralph Nader's landmark book Unsafe at Any Speed, which was published the previous year. The book opened with the faulty rear suspension system of the General Motors Corvair, This defect could cause the Corvair to skid violently and roll over. The corporate negligence that had produced the various Corvair defects, Nader said, was “one of the greatest acts of industrial irresponsibility.” More broadly, Unsafe at Any Speed documented how Detroit habitually subordinated safety to style and marketing concerns. The main cause of automobile occupant injuries, Nader demonstrated, was not the “nut behind the wheel” so often blamed by the auto industry, but the inherent engineering and design deficiencies of motor vehicles that were woefully unsafe, especially in terms of “crashworthiness”—no seat belts, etc. At the signing, President Johnson said, “I am proud of the 89th Congress, which took my proposals and brought forth these laws. And I’m proud at this moment to sign these bills—which promise, in the years to come, to cure the highway disease, to end the years of horror and give us hope.” The publication of Unsafe at Any Speed led to GM’s contemptible investigation by private detectives and attempts to smear Nader, GM's subsequent public apology at a Senate hearing, and ultimately the 1966 auto and highway safety laws that have saved countless lives and profoundly accelerated the pace of auto safety innovation.
    [Show full text]
  • Public Citizen Copyright © 2016 by Public Citizen Foundation All Rights Reserved
    Public Citizen Copyright © 2016 by Public Citizen Foundation All rights reserved. Public Citizen Foundation 1600 20th St. NW Washington, D.C. 20009 www.citizen.org ISBN: 978-1-58231-099-2 Doyle Printing, 2016 Printed in the United States of America PUBLIC CITIZEN THE SENTINEL OF DEMOCRACY CONTENTS Preface: The Biggest Get ...................................................................7 Introduction ....................................................................................11 1 Nader’s Raiders for the Lost Democracy....................................... 15 2 Tools for Attack on All Fronts.......................................................29 3 Creating a Healthy Democracy .....................................................43 4 Seeking Justice, Setting Precedents ..............................................61 5 The Race for Auto Safety ..............................................................89 6 Money and Politics: Making Government Accountable ..............113 7 Citizen Safeguards Under Siege: Regulatory Backlash ................155 8 The Phony “Lawsuit Crisis” .........................................................173 9 Saving Your Energy .................................................................... 197 10 Going Global ...............................................................................231 11 The Fifth Branch of Government................................................ 261 Appendix ......................................................................................271 Acknowledgments ........................................................................289
    [Show full text]
  • (Still) “Unsafe at Any Speed”1: Why Not Jail for Auto Executives?
    View metadata, citation and similar papers at core.ac.uk brought to you by CORE provided by Digital Commons @ UM Law \\jciprod01\productn\H\HLP\9-2\HLP209.txt unknown Seq: 1 29-MAY-15 14:47 (Still) “Unsafe at Any Speed”1: Why Not Jail for Auto Executives? Rena Steinzor* I. “THE YEAR OF THE RECALL” 2 In 2014, the manufacturers of motor vehicles sold in America recalled sixty-four million vehicles, an astounding number that represented about forty-five percent of all passenger cars registered in 2012, the last year for which numbers are available, and that also exceeded the combined total of cars recalled during the previous three years.3 The momentum for this bad run began to build in 2009 when motorists reported sudden acceleration problems with Toyota cars, a brand that had been the gold standard for safety.4 Motorists’ anxiety escalated when General Motors (GM) admitted that faulty ignition switches could cause its compact cars to stall if drivers brushed their key chains with their knees, disabling both the power steering and air bags.5 The final straw was the discovery that air bags manufactured by the Takata Corporation, which dominates the U.S. market for that essen- tial part, could shoot shrapnel into people’s faces upon deployment.6 1 This famous phrase is the title of book published by Ralph Nader in 1965: Unsafe at Any Speed, The Designed-In Dangers of the American Automobile, which is largely credited with inspiring the creation of the auto safety regulatory system in the U.S.
    [Show full text]
  • Studebaker's 1956 Golden Hawk by Frank Ambrogio Studebaker's 1956 Golden Hawk by Frank Ambrogio
    Studebaker's 1956 Golden Hawk by Frank Ambrogio Studebaker's 1956 Golden Hawk by Frank Ambrogio The 1956 Studebaker Golden Hawk is a unique car However, this was not always the case . ..1 which never achieved the level of acceptance pre- There was a time when no one seemed to dicted at its introduction. It's the only product of the notice the heavy front end. During its inaugu- Studebaker-Packard Corporation to reflect its dual com- ral year, the 1956 Golden Hawk was given pany heritage. The platform was the 1953 Studebaker high marks in almost every category, includ- Starliner. The engine and automatic transmission, were ing handling. both products of the Packard arm of the corporation. Several magazines of the period, pub- The management of Studebaker-Packard probably felt lished test drive reports. Tom McCahill had the car would appeal to both Studebaker and Packard fans. the only negative commentary on the car's However, the opposite happened. The Packard power handling. Here are some of the comments: plant never generated much interest among most Studebaker fans. The Packard crowd also fai-led to Mechanix Illustrated April 1956 Tom embrace this illegitimate offspring of orphaned parents. McCahill: "Due to the tremendous torque of the engine cornering maneuvers. The ride was comfortable at all As a matter of fact, the old car hobby, in general, has been (380 foot-pounds @ 2800 rpm) and due to the fact that the times." an apathetic audience. Hawk is quite a nose heavy car (because of its heavy Motor Life Oct 1956 Ken Fermoyle: "This car had Yet, the model has a lot going for it.
    [Show full text]
  • Automobile Safety: a Diagnosis of an Epidemic
    Washington and Lee Law Review Volume 23 | Issue 2 Article 9 Fall 9-1-1966 Automobile Safety: A Diagnosis Of An Epidemic Follow this and additional works at: https://scholarlycommons.law.wlu.edu/wlulr Part of the Transportation Law Commons Recommended Citation Automobile Safety: A Diagnosis Of An Epidemic, 23 Wash. & Lee L. Rev. 327 (1966), https://scholarlycommons.law.wlu.edu/wlulr/vol23/iss2/9 This Note is brought to you for free and open access by the Washington and Lee Law Review at Washington & Lee University School of Law Scholarly Commons. It has been accepted for inclusion in Washington and Lee Law Review by an authorized editor of Washington & Lee University School of Law Scholarly Commons. For more information, please contact [email protected]. 19661 NOTE NOTE AUTOMOBILE SAFETY: A DIAGNOSIS OF AN -EPIDEMIC Our country is currently faced with a major epidemic on'its high- ways. The severity and magnitude of this problem are such that it demands intensive and immediate action, yet our current efforts in curtailing the number of deaths and injuries caused by automobiles have been ineffective and misdirected. The problem has reached such grave proportions and poses such a serious threat to the safety of every individual in our society that there is an immediate need for the formulation of a national policy on automobile safety.' From 1900 through 1964 motor vehicles have accounted for 1,510,000 deaths in the United States, while war deaths from 1775 through 1964 to- taled only 605,000.2 We have well-established military and foreign policies, yet there has been no manifestation of a national policy on automobile safety.
    [Show full text]
  • Ford) Compared with Japanese
    A MAJOR STUDY OF AMERICAN (FORD) COMPARED WITH JAPANESE (HONDA) AUTOMOTIVE INDUSTRY – THEIR STRATEGIES AFFECTING SURVIABILTY PATRICK F. CALLIHAN Bachelor of Engineering in Material Science Youngstown State University June 1993 Master of Science in Industrial and Manufacturing Engineering Youngstown State University March 2000 Submitted in partial fulfillment of requirements for the degree DOCTOR OF ENGINEERING at the CLEVELAND STATE UNIVERSITY AUGUST, 2010 This Dissertation has been approved for the Department of MECHANICAL ENGINEERING and the College of Graduate Studies by Dr. L. Ken Keys, Dissertation Committee Chairperson Date Department of Mechanical Engineering Dr. Paul A. Bosela Date Department of Civil and Environmental Engineering Dr. Bahman Ghorashi Date Department of Chemical and Biomedical Engineering Dean of Fenn College of Engineering Dr. Chien-Hua Lin Date Department Computer and Information Science Dr. Hanz Richter Date Department of Mechanical Engineering ACKNOWLEDGMENTS First I would like to express my sincere appreciation to Dr. Keys, my advisor, for spending so much time with me and providing me with such valuable experience and guidance. I would like to thank each of my committee members for their participation: Dr. Paul Bosela, Dr. Baham Ghorashi, Dr. Chien-Hua Lin and Dr. Hanz Richter. I want to especially thank my wife, Kimberly and two sons, Jacob and Nicholas, for the sacrifice they gave during my efforts. A MAJOR STUDY OF AMERICAN (FORD) COMPARED WITH JAPANESE (HONDA) AUTOMOTIVE INDUSTRY – THEIR STRATEGIES AFFECTING SURVIABILTY PATRICK F. CALLIHAN ABSTRACT Understanding the role of technology, in the automotive industry, is necessary for the development, implementation, service and disposal of such technology, from a complete integrated system life cycle approach, to assure long-term success.
    [Show full text]
  • War in the Balkans, 1991-2002
    WAR IN THE BALKANS, 1991-2002 R. Craig Nation August 2003 ***** The views expressed in this report are those of the author and do not necessarily reflect the official policy or position of the Department of the Army, the Department of Defense, or the U.S. Government. This report is cleared for public release; distribution is unlimited. ***** Comments pertaining to this report are invited and should be forwarded to: Director, Strategic Studies Institute, U.S. Army War College, 122 Forbes Ave., Carlisle, PA 17013-5244. Copies of this report may be obtained from the Publications Office by calling (717) 245-4133, FAX (717) 245-3820, or be e-mail at [email protected] ***** Most 1993, 1994, and all later Strategic Studies Institute (SSI) monographs are available on the SSI Homepage for electronic dissemination. SSI’s Homepage address is: http://www.carlisle.army.mil/ssi/ ***** The Strategic Studies Institute publishes a monthly e-mail newsletter to update the national security community on the research of our analysts, recent and forthcoming publications, and upcoming conferences sponsored by the Institute. Each newsletter also provides a strategic commentary by one of our research analysts. If you are interested in receiving this newsletter, please let us know by e-mail at [email protected] or by calling (717) 245-3133. ISBN 1-58487-134-2 ii CONTENTS Foreword . v Preface . vii Map of the Balkan Region. viii 1. The Balkan Region in World Politics . 1 2. The Balkans in the Short 20th Century . 43 3. The State of War: Slovenia and Croatia, 1991-92.
    [Show full text]
  • Spooky Business: Corporate Espionage Against Nonprofit Organizations
    Spooky Business: Corporate Espionage Against Nonprofit Organizations By Gary Ruskin Essential Information P.O Box 19405 Washington, DC 20036 (202) 387-8030 November 20, 2013 TABLE OF CONTENTS EXECUTIVE SUMMARY 3 INTRODUCTION 5 The brave new world of corporate espionage 5 The rise of corporate espionage against nonprofit organizations 6 NARRATIVES OF CORPORATE ESPIONAGE 9 Beckett Brown International vs. many nonprofit groups 9 The Center for Food Safety, Friends of the Earth and GE Food Alert 13 U.S. Public Interest Research Group, Friends of the Earth, National Environmental Trust/GE Food Alert, Center for Food Safety, Environmental Media Services, Environmental Working Group, Institute for Global Communications, Pesticide Action Network. 15 Fenton Communications 15 Greenpeace, CLEAN and the Lake Charles Project 16 North Valley Coalition 17 Nursing home activists 17 Mary Lou Sapone and the Brady Campaign 17 US Chamber of Commerce/HBGary Federal/Hunton & Williams vs. U.S. Chamber Watch/Public Citizen/Public Campaign/MoveOn.org/Velvet Revolution/Center for American Progress/Tides Foundation/Justice Through Music/Move to Amend/Ruckus Society 18 HBGary Federal/Hunton & Williams/Bank of America vs. WikiLeaks 21 Chevron/Kroll in Ecuador 22 Walmart vs. Up Against the Wal 23 Électricité de France vs. Greenpeace 23 E.ON/Scottish Resources Group/Scottish Power/Vericola/Rebecca Todd vs. the Camp for Climate Action 25 Burger King and Diplomatic Tactical Services vs. the Coalition of Immokalee Workers 26 The Pharmaceutical Research and Manufacturers Association and others vs. James Love/Knowledge Ecology International 26 Feld Entertainment vs. PETA, PAWS and other animal protection groups 27 BAE vs.
    [Show full text]
  • Motor Vehicle Safety: Issues for Congress
    Motor Vehicle Safety: Issues for Congress Updated January 26, 2021 Congressional Research Service https://crsreports.congress.gov R46398 SUMMARY R46398 Motor Vehicle Safety: Issues for Congress January 26, 2021 Vehicle safety is a significant issue as Congress considers a replacement for the current authorization of surface transportation programs, the Fixing America’s Surface Transportation Bill Canis Act (FAST Act; P.L. 114-94), which expires at the end of FY2021. Vehicle safety provisions Specialist in Industrial th were included in the Moving Forward Act (H.R. 2; 116 Congress), passed by the House of Organization and Business Representatives in July 2020; the legislation was not enacted. Responsibility for motor vehicle safety lies with the National Highway Traffic Safety Administration (NHTSA) within the U.S. Department of Transportation (DOT). The agency’s performance has been controversial, in part because of its handling of the largest-ever recall, involving more than 63 million Takata airbags; since the recall was ordered in 2015, nearly 16 million potentially defective airbags have not been replaced. NHTSA has been without a Senate-confirmed administrator since 2017. Under federal law, NHTSA has the power to promulgate standards for cars and light trucks. The combination of new vehicle designs, greater vehicle automation, and federal standards—including those for seat belts, airbags, hood and door latches, and children’s car seats—has contributed to a reduction in the fatality rate by 80% over the past six decades. NHTSA does not approve vehicles before they are manufactured, but may order or encourage a vehicle or parts manufacturer to recall products that violate its standards.
    [Show full text]