How and Interact: a Look Through the High-Energy Window

Katja Poppenhaeger Queen's University Belfast → University Potsdam / Leibniz Institute for Astrophysics AIP

Star- systems

Star-exoplanet systems

Star-exoplanet systems

Star-exoplanet systems

Star-exoplanet systems

tidal interaction

Star-exoplanet systems

tidal interaction

star spinning faster → higher Lx Star-exoplanet systems

magnetic interaction

Star-exoplanet systems

magnetic interaction

stellar flares, hot spots Star-exoplanet systems

planetary effects

Star-exoplanet systems

planetary effects

atmospheric blow-off

Star-exoplanet systems

planetary effects

aurorae

Star-exoplanet systems

planetary effects

hot dynamos

Star-exoplanet systems

tidal interaction

star spinning faster → higher Lx Tidal interaction

Mathis & Remus (2013)

see also Lanza & Mathis (2016) How stars age on the

loss of angular momentum through stellar wind (“magnetic braking”)

Bias-controlled sample: planet-hosting wide binaries

image credit: Mugrauer et al. (2007); see also Raghavan (2006) Planet-hosting wide binaries

HD 189733 Ab B CoRoT-2 Ab B 55 Cnc Abcde B

. , ) p 4 e r 1 p 0

2 n i (

. . l l a a upsilon And Ab B tau Boo Ab B HAT-P-20 Ab B t t e e

r r e e g g e e a a h h n n e e p p p p o o P P HD 109749 Ab B HD 46375 Ab B HD 178911 A Bb Planet-hosting wide binaries strong tidal interaction

weak tidal interaction

Planet-hosting wide binaries

e

v

i

t

c

a

e

r

o m

Planet-hosting wide binaries

e

v

i

t

c

a

e

r

o m

Planet-hosting wide binaries

e

v

i

t

c

a

e

r

o m

Planet-hosting wide binaries

e

v

i

t

c

a

e

r

o m

Planet-hosting wide binaries

e

v

i

t

c

a

e

r

o m

Several over-active systems

e

v

i

t

c

a

e

r

o m

Poppenhaeger et al. (2014), Poppenhaeger et al. to be submitted Star-exoplanet systems

magnetic interaction

stellar flares, hot spots Planet-induced activity?

HD 179949 upsilon And P = 4.6 d Porb = 3.1 d orb P = 9.5 d Prot = 11 d rot Shkolnik et al. (2005, 2008) Planet-induced activity?

courtesy of O. Cohen; see also Pillitteri et al. 2014 Planet-induced activity?

courtesy of O. Cohen; see also Pillitteri et al. 2014 Planet-induced activity?

courtesy of O. Cohen; see also Pillitteri et al. 2014 Planet-induced activity?

courtesy of O. Cohen; see also Pillitteri et al. 2014 Planet-induced activity?

courtesy of O. Cohen; see also Pillitteri et al. 2014 Planet-induced activity?

courtesy of O. Cohen; see also Pillitteri et al. 2014 Planets in eccentric orbits

2 stars:

Flares from colliding magnetospheres: Getman et al. (2011); but: Getman et al. (2016) Planets in eccentric orbits star + planet:

periastron

Planets in eccentric orbits

Maggio et al. (2015) Planets in eccentric orbits

star + planet:

periastron -> flare triggering This should depend on the planet's magnetosphere! Star-exoplanet systems

planetary effects

atmospheric blow-off

Atmospheres and high-energy photons

image credit: NASA Extended atmospheres in UV/X-ray

Hot Neptune GJ 436 b:

comet-like tail

Kulow et al. (2014), Ehrenreich et al. (2015) X-ray transits: extended atmospheres

HD 189733 b Poppenhaeger et al. (2013)

X-ray transits: extended atmospheres

HD 189733 b Poppenhaeger et al. (2013)

X-ray transits: extended atmospheres

HD 189733 b Poppenhaeger et al. (2013)

Extended atmospheres in UV/X-ray

Different windows to exoplanetary atmospheres:

Hydrogen Ly-alpha (UV) Soft X-rays

probe atomic hydrogen probe heavier elements (C, N, O, Ne, ...)

Survival of exoplanet atmospheres

Erosion by high-energy irradiation: time-limited because cool stars spin down. Strong spin-down/X-ray dimming at old ages:

slope of -2.8 instead of canonical -1 for younger stars!

Booth, Poppenhaeger et al. (2017) Star-exoplanet systems

planetary effects

hot planet dynamos

The hottest known planet: KELT-9b

A0 type host star, 206 pc

young-ish system (300 Myr)

in 1.5 orbit

equilibrium temperature 4000K

→hotter than most stars!

Gaudi et al. (2017) Strong magnetic fields for very hot

Simulations:

strongly irradiated Hot Jupiters can have strong magnetic fields powered through enhanced dynamo processes

Rogers & McElwaine (2017) Yadav & Thorngren (2017) Strong magnetic fields for very hot exoplanets

Jupiter: ~5 G !

Simulations:

strongly irradiated Hot Jupiters can have strong magnetic fields powered through enhanced dynamo processes

Rogers & McElwaine (2017) Yadav & Thorngren (2017) X-ray detection experiment for KELT-9b

50 ks XMM exposure (DDT)

Poppenhaeger, Yadav, Guenther, Pillitteri, Schmitt, Wolk X-ray detection experiment for KELT-9b

Star: X-ray dark (non-chemically peculiar A star)

upper limit planet:

27 LX < 7 x 10 erg/s

i.e. X-ray dimmer than cool stars at same age

Can test for surface fluxes similar to cool stars with Athena!

Poppenhaeger, Yadav, Guenther, Pillitteri, Schmitt, Wolk Star-exoplanet systems

tidal interaction

probably yes

Star-exoplanet systems

magnetic interaction

probably yes

stellar flares, hot spots Star-exoplanet systems

planetary effects

common in short-period systems atmospheric blow-off

Star-exoplanet systems

planetary effects

testable with next-gen X-ray telescopes hot planet dynamos

Extra slides

Young M dwarf & Hot Jupiter (?)

PTFO 8-8695, a young (3 Myr) M dwarf in the 25 Ori association

Young M dwarf & Hot Jupiter (?)

Transit light curve of varying depth & duration & hundreds of more transits by now, van Eyken et al. (2012) Light curve dips of young M dwarfs

Barnes et al. (2013) Light curve dips of young M dwarfs

Stauffer et al. 2017 The system in X-ray observations

2009

Poppenhaeger et al. in prep. The system in X-ray observations

2017

Poppenhaeger et al. in prep. Light curve dips of young M dwarfs

Stauffer et al. 2017 Light curve dips of young M dwarfs

Dips tied to period

- planet at co-rotation radius, triggering flares?

- ejected coronal material (like slingshot prominences)?

Stauffer et al. 2017