For Egg Pr Oducers for Egg Pr Oducers
Total Page:16
File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb
Load more
Recommended publications
-
Range Poultry Housing
Range Poultry Housing LIVESTOCK PRODUCTION GUIDE By Robert Plamondon Edited by Anne Fanatico and Richard Earles NCAT Agriculture Specialists June 2003 Abstract: Experienced pastured-poultry producer Robert Plamondon (1) discusses housing designs for outdoor production. Introduction In this document, I will describe housing de- signs that give chickens access to green plants in yards or pastures, as opposed to confinement or Table of Contents bare-yard systems. There are a variety of housing Introduction ......................................... 1 styles commonly used for ranged chickens, each of which is associated with a particular management Background......................................... 2 style that I will also describe. Design Considerations for Range My wife, Karen, and I have been raising free- Operations .......................................... 2 range hens in Oregon since 1996 and pastured broil- ers since 1998. We have 700 hens and will raise over Daily-move Pens ................................. 3 1,500 broilers this year. We have tried many differ- Machine-Portable Housing .................. 8 ent techniques, and I hope this will allow me to speak clearly about the key points and trade-offs in Examples of Machine-Portable Housing each of the major range management styles. ....................................................... 12 I discuss a variety of housing types in this docu- ment. I’ve necessarily placed an emphasis on the Fixed Housing ................................... 14 ones I have used myself, since I have -
Profitable Poultry: Raising Birds on Pasture
Livestock Alternatives CONTENTS DETERMINING THE IGHT YSTEM Profitable Poultry: R S 2 POULTRY SYSTEM OPTIONS 3 PRODUCTION BASICS 5 Raising Birds on Pasture FEED 7 BREEDS 7 MORTALITY AND PREDATION 8 ON-FARM PROCESSING 9 COOPERATIVE MOBILE PROCESSORS 10 ENVIRONMENTAL BENEFITS 11 FAMILY AND LIFESTYLE BENEFITS 12 COMMUNITY BENEFITS 13 MARKETING OPTIONS 14 RESOURCES 16 Published by the Sustainable Agriculture Network (SAN), the national outreach arm Virginia’s Joel Salatin, a leader in the movement to expand poultry production outdoors, demonstrates a movable of the Sustainable Agriculture pen, one alternative system detailed in this bulletin. – Photo by Tom Gettings/Rodale Institute Research and Education (SARE) program, with funding LIKE MANY FAMILY FARMERS, CHUCK AND MARY SMITH The enterprise ensures a respectable income for their by USDA's Cooperative State integrate several diverse enterprises to ensure their effort, involves the whole family and blends well with Research, Education and continued ability to earn a living on 200 acres in north other aspects of their operation, from raising organic Extension Service. central Kentucky.“We look for things we can do as a beef to growing grapes for a new winery. They graze family,”Chuck said, including his three daughters. their 50 cattle on the same pastures used by the chick- Also available at: “We want something that’ll keep us and them here ens and are exploring the idea of turkeys grazing www.sare.org/publications/ for a long time.” among their grapevines. poultry.htm To the Smiths, that means diversifying into new The Smiths also grow organic produce to sell at enterprises and establishing sustainable practices two local farmers markets and harvest five or six acres quite unlike the traditional corn and soybean rotations of tobacco each year. -
Growing Your Range Poultry Business: an Entrepreneur's Toolbox
Growing Your Range Poultry Business: An Entrepreneur’s Toolbox Written for Heifer International by Anne Fanatico, National Center for Appropriate Technology and David Redhage, Kerr Center for Sustainable Agriculture. With contributions by Nancy Grudens Schuck, Wayne Knoblauch, Judy Joanna Green, and Mary Saylor. October 2002 Table of Contents FOREWORD AND Foreword ....................................................... 1 Using the Toolbox .........................................2 ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS Introduction ................................................... 3 Feasibility. ..................................................... 6 This Toolbox was produced by the National Personal & Family Considerations Center for Appropriate Technology (NCAT) and Choosing an Enterprise..................... 6 and the Kerr Center for Sustainable Marketing: Will it Sell? ................................. 8 Agriculture as part of a Heifer International Production: Can it Be Done? ..................... 13 Profitability: Will it Make Money?............... 22 project to enhance the opportunities to Financial Reality: Can You Afford expand range poultry businesses. to Do It? ..................................................26 Developing a Business Plan From the The three-year project also examined the use Feasibility Study .......................................26 of mobile processing units (MPUs) for Record Keeping .......................................... 28 poultry. MPUs are an infrastructure Assistance and Resources ......................... 28 Working -
Feather Pecking and Cannibalism in Birds
Bulgarian Journal of Veterinary Medicine, 2020 ONLINE FIRST ISSN 1311-1477; DOI: 10.15547/bjvm.2020-0027 Review TYPES AND CLINICAL PRESENTATION OF DAMAGING BEHAVIOUR FEATHER PECKING AND CANNIBALISM IN BIRDS S. NIKOLOV & D. KANAKOV Department of Internal Non-Infectious Diseases, Faculty of Veterinary Medicine Summary Nikolov, S. & D. Kanakov, 2020. Types and clinical presentation of damaging behaviour feather pecking and cannibalism in birds. Bulg. J. Vet. Med. (online first). Behavioural disorders, including feather pecking and cannibalism, are a common problem in both domestic and wild birds. The consequences of this behaviour on welfare of birds incur serious eco- nomic losses. Pecking behaviour in birds is either normal or injurious. The type of normal pecking behaviour includes non-aggressive feather pecking – allopreening and autopreening. Aggressive feather pecking aimed at maintenance and establishment of hierarchy in the flock is not associated to feathering damage. Injurious pecking causes damage of individual feathers and of feathering as a whole. Two clinical presentations of feather pecking are known in birds. The gentle feather pecking causes minimum damage; it is further divided into normal and stereotyped with bouts; it could how- ever evolve into severe feather pecking manifested with severe pecking, pulling and removal, even consumption of feathers of the victim, which experiences pain. Severe feather pecking results in bleeding from feather follicle, deterioration of plumage and appearance of denuded areas on victim’s body. Prolonged feather pecking leads to tissue damage and consequently, cannibalism. The nume- rous clinical presentations of the latter include pecking of the back, abdomen, neck and wings. Vent pecking and abdominal pecking incur important losses especially during egg-laying. -
How to Get the Most from Your Small Flock
Raising Chickens in Your Backyard Adam Hady Agriculture Agent- Richland County UWEX Nelson Agri-Center Viroqua WI Saturday 20, 2013 Disclaimer This presentation contains trade names and products from private companies- these are for educational purposes only and are in no way an endorsement by UWEX Topics • Selection of Chickens (5-13) • Housing & Equipment (14-29) • Winter considerations (17-29) • Starting Chicks (30-35) • Poultry Nutrition Basics (36-46) • Pasturing Poultry (47-59) • General Poultry Health (60-70) • Layers and Eggs (71-78) • Meat Birds (79-82) Benefits to raising chickens Selecting the Right Chicken for You SO Many Where To Start • American Poultry Association About 55 Breeds of Standard Chickens About 65 Breeds of Bantam Chickens Many other breeds that are not recognized Selecting A Breed: What type of chicken do you want ? Layer type Dual Purpose Meat type Ornamental What size ??? • Standard Chickens vs Bantam Chickens Both chickens are 2 year old hens top is a standard dark Cornish bottom is a bantam dark Cornish Note: all standard chickens have a bantam but not all bantams have a standard What Color? What Pattern? Columbian Spangled Mottled Laced Barred Any “Funky LooK?” What Type of Comb? Pea Rose Single Strawberry V-Comb Cushion Buttercup Sources of Birds • Hatcheries – Large quantities – Sell day olds – Breed type may be lacking • Breeders – Breed type better – May be able to buy smaller quantities and older birds – Cost more • Swaps, auctions, etc. – Inexpensive, – Purchase mature birds – Health could be an issue Housing & Equipment Housing Chicken Requirements Key Factors: Types Square Feet Clean and dry Layer type 1.5 Adequately Pullets ventilated and draft free Layer type 2 Adults Provides the proper space Broiler type 2-3 Provides protection Age Water Feed Equipment (Weeks) Space (in) Space (in) 0-4 .25 1 Feeding System 4-8 .5 2 Watering System 8-16 1 3 Laying/Breeding/Ornamentals Nest Boxes – 1sq. -
SB276 1937 Turkey Production in Kansas
TURKEY PRODUCTION IN KANSAS SUMMARY 1. Turkeys are grown on 10 percent of Kansas farms, located principally in the central part of the state. Few growers employ artificial hatching and brooding. 2. Pullet breeders produce larger families than do hen breeders. Egg pro- duction and hatchability decrease with age. Vigorous, well-matured, “plump,” straight-keeled individuals should be selected for breeding purposes. There appears to be little evidence that it is necessary to introduce new blood every few years to maintain vigor. 3. The average Kansas breeding female will reach sexual maturity in March and will produce 40 eggs during the hatching season. The use of morning lights starting December 1 will advance the onset of egg production two months. Under these conditions the average female will lay 68 eggs. The stimulation of early production may reduce the hatching power of the egg. Confining the breeding stock appears to have no deleterious effect on fertility or hatchability if the known dietary requirements are cared for. 4. Breeding turkeys have a high vitamin A (green feed) requirement. The number of eggs laid and the color and texture of the egg shell are affected by the level of this vitamin in the ration. 5. Continuous incubation in the gravity ventilated incubator appears to give best hatching results. Turkey eggs should sustain by evaporation and metabolism a loss in the original weight ranging from 11 to 13 percent at the conclusion of the 24th day of incubation. Of the eggs viable on the 24th day, those having the greatest relative loss in weight gave the poorest hatcha- bility. -
Differentiated Cost of Production in the Northwest: an Analysis of Six Food Categories
Differentiated Cost of Production in the Northwest: An Analysis of Six Food Categories CHICKEN June 2016 This research was commissioned by the Cascadia Foodshed Financing Project, a project of Philanthropy Northwest, and made possible by generous grants from JPMorgan Chase Foundation, the Greater Tacoma Community Foundation and the Thread Fund. Ecotrust appreciates the thoughtful support and partnership of these organizations to pursue reliable prosperity for all Oregonians and Washingtonians. Cascadia Foodshed Financing Project For more than twenty years, Ecotrust has converted $80 million in grants into more than $800 million in assets for local people, businesses, and organizations from Alaska to California. Ecotrust’s many innovations include cofounding an environmental bank, starting the world’s first ecosystem investment fund, creating programs in fisheries, forestry, food, farms, and social finance, and developing new tools to improve social, economic, and environmental decision-making. Ecotrust honors and supports the wisdom of Native and First Nation leadership in its work. Learn more at www.ecotrust.org ECOTRUST CASCADIA FOODSHED FINANCING PROJECT TABLE OF CONTENTS Project Background 5 What is Poultry of the Middle? 9 Conventional and Alternative Poultry Systems 10 Estimating Regional Consumer Market Size 11 Data Model for Field Pen System, Pastured Poultry 17 Sensitivity Analysis: Feed Costs and Purchase Prices 18 Comparison to Conventional Broiler Production 20 Further Work 21 Conclusions 23 Reference 26 Appendix A. Data Model Assumptions 30 Appendix B. Data Model User Instructions III ECOTRUST CASCADIA FOODSHED FINANCING PROJECT Project Background Consumers have demonstrated a willingness to pay a premium for food attributes such as “free range,” “antibiotic-free,” “organic,” and “local.” However, when production systems designed to yield those attributes are authentically implemented on the ground, such methods also tend to bear higher production and processing costs in comparison to conventional production methods. -
The Prevention and Control of Feather Pecking in Laying Hens: Identifying the Underlying Principles T.B
doi:10.1017/S0043933913000354 The prevention and control of feather pecking in laying hens: identifying the underlying principles T.B. RODENBURG1, 2*, M.M. VAN KRIMPEN3, I.C. DE JONG3, E.N. DE HAAS4, M.S. KOPS5, B.J. RIEDSTRA6, R.E. NORDQUIST7, J.P. WAGENAAR8, M. BESTMAN8 and C.J. NICOL9 1Animal Breeding and Genomics Centre, Wageningen University, PO Box 338, 6700 AH Wageningen, The Netherlands; 2Behavioural Ecology Group, Wageningen University, PO Box 338, 6700 AH Wageningen, The Netherlands; 3Livestock Research, Wageningen UR, PO Box 65, 8200 AB, Lelystad, The Netherlands; 4Adaptation Physiology Group, Wageningen University, PO Box 338, 6700 AH Wageningen, The Netherlands; 5Department of Psychopharmacology, Utrecht Institute for Pharmaceutical Sciences (UIPS) and Rudolf Magnus Institute of Neuroscience, Utrecht University, PO Box 80.082, 3508 TB Utrecht, The Netherlands; 6Behavioural Biology, University of Groningen, Nijenborgh 7, 9747 AG Groningen, The Netherlands; 7Emotion & Cognition Group, Department of Farm Animal Health, Faculty of Veterinary Medicine and Rudolf Magnus Institute of Neuroscience, Utrecht University, Yalelaan 7, 3584 CL Utrecht, The Netherlands; 8Louis Bolk Institute, Hoofdstraat 24, 3972 LA Driebergen, The Netherlands; 9Animal Welfare & Behaviour, School of Veterinary Sciences, Bristol University, Langford House, Langford, Bristol, BS40 5DU, United Kingdom *Corresponding author: [email protected] Feather pecking (FP) in laying hens remains an important economic and welfare issue. This paper reviews the literature on causes of FP in laying hens. With the ban on conventional cages in the EU from 2012 and the expected future ban on beak trimming in many European countries, addressing this welfare issue has become more pressing than ever. -
Feather Pecking and Monoamines a Behavioral and Neurobiological Approach
Feather pecking and monoamines A behavioral and neurobiological approach Marjolein Suzanne Kops Kops, M.S. Feather pecking and monoamines – a behavioral and neurobiological approach Thesis Utrecht University – with ref. – with summary in Dutch ISBN: 978-90-3936-128-3 Cover art by Chaïm Becker Cover design by Chaïm Becker and Ridderprint Printed by Ridderprint, Ridderkerk © Marjolein Kops, 2014, Utrecht, the Netherlands All rights reserved. No part of this thesis may be reproduced or transmitted in any form or by any means, electric, mechanical (including photocopying, recording, or information storage and retrieval system) without prior written permission of the author or the copyright owner journal. Feather pecking and monoamines A behavioral and neurobiological approach Verenpikken en monoamines Een gedrags- en neurobiologische aanpak (met een samenvatting in het Nederlands) Proefschrift ter verkrijging van de graad van doctor aan de Universiteit Utrecht op gezag van de rector magnificus, prof.dr. G.J. van der Zwaan, ingevolge het besluit van het college voor promoties in het openbaar te verdedigen op woensdag 9 april 2014 des middags te 4.15 uur door Marjolein Suzanne Kops geboren op 27 maart 1981 te Heerlen Promotoren: Prof.dr. B. Olivier Prof.dr.dr. h.c. O. Güntürkün Co-promotoren: Dr. S.M. Korte Dr.ir. J.E. Bolhuis “Which way you ought to go depends on where you want to get to...” ― Lewis Carroll, Alice in Wonderland TABLE OF CONTENTS Chapter 1 General introduction 9 Chapter 2 Effects of feather pecking phenotype (severe feather -
Poultry Farm
Profile No.: 194 NIC Code:10802 POULTRY FARM 1. INTRODUCTION: Poultry has an important role in India as eggs and meats are the important and comparatively cheap source of protein and vitamins. Chicken is most widely accepted meat in India. Eggs have become an important ingredient of morning breakfast for a large number of families in urban areas. So overall the poultry business seems to be a good option for someone who wants to start a new business with less investment. 2. PRODUCT & ITS APPLICATION: Chicken is widely consumed meat across India. In many regions, various dishes are prepared from chicken meat. Moreover, eggs from chicken too are widely accepted because of its nutrients at cheaper rate. Morning breakfast to various other food preparations, bakery products, eggs are largely used in Indian population. Second important thing is, there is no religious taboo for chicken while it is there for beef and pork. As Chicken meat and eggs are good and cheap source of proteins, vitamins and other nutrients, they are extensively used in day to day diet of Indian people. 3. DESIRED QUALIFICATIONS FOR PROMOTER: Successful running this project does not require any specific qualification. 4. INDUSTRY LOOKOUT AND TRENDS Today India is the world's fifth largest egg producer and the eighteenth largest producer of broilers and its per capita consumption of such products are poor - 37 eggs and 1 kg of poultry meat per capita per annum. The growth of the Poultry Industry in India is marked by an increase in the size of the poultry farm. In past years broiler farms had produced on average a few hundred birds (200-500 chicks) per cycle. -
Australian Food Sovereignty Alliance
Animal Welfare Standards Public Consultation PO Box 5116 Braddon ACT 2612 BY EMAIL TO: [email protected] Re: Response to the Proposed Draft Australian Animal Welfare Standards and Guidelines for Poultry 26 February 2018 Prepared by Sarah de Wit, Tammi Jonas, Courtney Young Australian Food Sovereignty Alliance 1 CONTENTS 26 FEBRUARY 2018 1 ABOUT THE AUSTRALIAN FOOD SOVEREIGNTY ALLIANCE (AFSA) 3 BACKGROUND 5 CONTEXT TO THE ANIMAL WELFARE STANDARDS AND GUIDELINES 5 CURRENT WELFARE STANDARDS AND GUIDELINES 6 PROPOSED STANDARDS AND OPTIONS 7 ISSUES WITH THE PROPOSED STANDARDS 8 EXECUTIVE SUMMARY 8 WHAT THE PROPOSED DRAFT MEANS FOR FARMERS 9 WHAT THE PROPOSED DRAFT MEANS FOR EATERS 9 WHAT THE PROPOSED DRAFT MEANS FOR POULTRY 9 WHAT AFSA MEMBERS WANT 9 LIST OF RECOMMENDATIONS 10 IDENTIFIED ISSUES WITH THE PROPOSED STANDARDS 11 THE EXCLUSION OF ALTERNATIVE PRODUCTION SYSTEMS 11 INADEQUACY OF STUDIES USED 14 ‘SYSTEMIC COLLUSION’ AND FAILURE TO MEET COMMUNITY EXPECTATIONS 17 HOUSING POULTRY IN CAGES 18 PROVISION OF LITTER AND DUST BATHS 22 PROVISION OF NESTS PERCHES AND LEVELS 23 FURNISHED CAGES 23 MAXIMUM STOCKING DENSITIES 24 STANDARDS ON BEAK AND BILL TRIMMING 25 STANDARDS ON STUNNING, SLAUGHTER AND ON-FARM KILLING 27 LIGHTING 29 INDUCED MOULTING 30 REGULATORY ISSUES 32 IMAGES OF PASTURED POULTRY 35 2 About the Australian Food Sovereignty Alliance (AFSA) The Australian Food Sovereignty Alliance (AFSA) is a collaboration of organisations and individuals working together towards a food system in which people can create, manage, and choose their food supply and distribution system. AFSA is an independent organisation and is not aligned with any political party. -
The Chicken Encyclopedia the Chicken Encyclopedia
THE CHICKEN ENCYCLOPEDIA THE CHICKEN ENCYCLOPEDIA AN ILLUSTRATED REFERENCE GAIL DAMEROW author of Storey's Guide to Raising Chickens i Storey Publishing The mission ofStorey Publishing is to serve our customers by publishing practical information that encourages personal independence in halwony with the environment. Edited by Deborah Burns Art direction and book design by Alethea Morrison Text production by Sourena Parham Cover and interior illustrations by © Bethany Caskey, except as noted on page 319 Interior photography credits appear on page 319 Indexed by Samantha Miller © 2012 by Gail Damerow All rights reserved. No part of this book may be reproduced without written permission from the publisher, except by a reviewer who may quote brief passages or reproduce illustrations in a review with appropriate credits; nor may any part of this book be reproduced, stored in a retrieval system, or transmitted in any form or by any means - electronic, mechanical, photocopying, recording, or other - without written permission from the publisher. The information in this book is true and complete to the best of our knowledge. All recommendations are made without guarantee on the part of the author or Storey Publishing. The author and publisher disclaim any liability in connection with the use of this information. Storey books are available for special premium and promotional uses and for customized editions. For further information, please call 1-800-793-9396. Storey Publishing 210 MASS MoCA Way North Adams. MA 01247 W�tw.storey.com Printed in the United States by Versa Press 10 987654321 Library of Congress Cataloging-in-Publication Data Damerow, Gail.