Classics 250B Spring 2017 Exam #1 Key Part I: 6 Points Each, 48 Total

Total Page:16

File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

Classics 250B Spring 2017 Exam #1 Key Part I: 6 Points Each, 48 Total Classics 250B Spring 2017 Exam #1 Key Part I: 6 points each, 48 total Livius Andronicus: first playwright to have performed a Latin play in Rome based on a Greek model in 240 BCE, and translator of Homer’s Odyssey. Menander: most famous playwright of Greek New Comedy (Late 4th/early 3rd century BCE), especially admired for his plays’ psychological realism; provided source-plays for many Roman comedies. Memmius: republican politician and literary patron of Lucretius; Catullus accompanied him on his governorship in Bithynia. suovetaurilia: the sacrifice of a pig, sheep, and bull; purification ritual for farmland described by Cato in De Agri Cultura. Pompey: chief opponent of Caesar in the civil wars, unenthusiastically supported by Cicero in his letters. Terentia: wife of Cicero, whom he addresses tenderly in his earlier letters, later divorced by Cicero. contaminatio: the blending together of plays or scenes from (multiple) plays, viewed as a fault by Terence’s critic(s), but essential to the Roman process of creatively adapting Greek literature. Epicurus: Greek founder of the philosophy of Epicureanism, based on atomic theory, as set forth in Lucretius’ poem On the Nature of Things. fabula palliata: “play in Greek style of dress”, the name given to the genre of Roman comedy based on Greek New Comedy, such as the plays of Plautus and Terence. Callimachus: important figure in Greek poetry in Alexandria (3rd century BCE), who influenced Latin poets such as Catullus and Lucretius (e.g. in advocating non-epic poetry, focus on craft, etc.). Lesbia: addressee of several of Catullus’ poems, identified with the historical Clodia; her fictional name reflects Catullus’ poetic debt to Sappho (early Greek lyric poet of Lesbos). Attis: main character of Catullus’ Poem 63 who, as priest of Cybele, castrates himself in the prime of youth and comes to regret his action. Part II: 20 points each (120 points total). Distribution of Points: (a): 2 points total (author & work) (b): 2 points total (speaker(s)) (c): 4 points total (context) (d): 12 points total (commentary) 1. (Plautus, Rudens 83ff.) a. Plautus, Rudens b. Sceparnio c. Sceparnio comments on the damage left by the storm in the play’s opening scene. d. some possible talking points for elaboration: 1. the comic incongruity of a crude rustic slave dropping an allusion to a Greek tragedy, i.e. the first instance of what becomes a running dialogue between comedy and tragedy in the play; 2. thematic possibilities embodied by the storm, e.g. the storm’s blowing the roof off Daemones’ house as a metaphor for the re-opening of the issues of familial identity that come with Palaestra’s fortuitous arrival in N. Africa; 3. the unusual role of the gods in this comedy (cf. “Neptune”, here mentioned immediately after Arcturus’ prologue about the justice of Jupiter’s universe). 2. (Lucretius, On the Nature of Things 2.1ff.) a. Lucretius, On the Nature of Things b. poem’s speaker/Lucretius c. one of the book openings, in which Lucretius typically praises Epicurus and the liberation his philosophy brings d. some possible talking points for elaboration: 1. the superior vantage point of the person watching the shipwreck symbolizes that of the ideal Epicurean, who has separated himself from the noise, danger, and anxiety of the world; 2. the simple (ethical) life of Epicureanism, i.e. living life in accordance with nature’s simple requirements, as it is laid out here; 3. the description of human ataraxia here approximates the detached and tranquil life of the gods vis-à-vis the (human) world. 3. (Catullus 1) a. Catullus, Poems b. poem’s speaker/Catullus c. the opening (i.e. “programmatic”) poem of the collection d. some possible talking points for elaboration: 1. Catullus’ setting forth of his Alexandrian program, esp. his “polished” papyrus, his choice of nugatory “scribbles”, the “slimness” of his volume; 2. possible patronage and the poert’s relationship with biographer/historian Cornelius Nepos; 3. the speaker’s seemingly ironic stance about his poetry and its durability. 4. (Plautus, Truculentus 873ff.) a. Plautus, Truculentus b. A = Phronesium; B = Diniarchus c. near the end of the play, Phronesium implicates Diniarchus in a further scam against Stratophanes; d. some possible talking points for elaboration: 1. the Plautine deformation of a typical Greek New Comedy (rape/marriage plot) into a play focused on a clever and manipulative prostitute (a good example of over-the-top characterization/caricature in P.); 2. the larger historical/cultural import of such a satire in the light of its post-2nd Punic War Roman world (traditional Roman views of prostitution, expenditure, etc.); 3. how the scene consolidates the play’s satirical focus on foolish lovers in setting up the cynical final—i.e. immediately following—scene, in which Phronesium demonstrates that her con-jobs will likely continue with the audience’s (moral) collusion. 5. (Terence, Adelphoe 985ff.) a. Terence, Adelphoe b. Demea c. the end of the play, just after Demea effectively has turned the tables on Micio by forcing him to marry and to give away his land, free a slave, etc. d. some possible talking points for elaboration: 1. contrary to expectations set up in the play, Demea shows Micio to be more a “pushover” than a principled, liberal theorist so far as parenting goes; 2. Demea’s offer to provide guidance to Aeschinus, taken together with his new tolerance and Aeschinus’s (positive) response here, suggests that the play advocates a middle position between the parental severity of Demea and the laxity of Micio, i.e. the drama in the end offers a mediation of opposites; 3. the play’s preoccupation with ethical issues, here related to parenting, is typical of Terence’s “naturalistic” comedy. 6. (Cato, De Agri Cultura, Introduction) a. Cato, De Agri Cultura b. the didactic speaker/Cato c. the introduction to his manual on farming d. some possible talking points for elaboration: 1. the work’s literary historical significance (first extant work of Latin prose, the continuation of the Greek didactic tradition in Rome); 2. the sharply elite perspective of a Roman style “gentleman farmer” (e.g. the landed aristocracy and its prejudice against trade and other potential vehicles of social mobility/threats to traditional order); 3. the—to us—moral absurdity of placing the slave-owning estate-overseeing farmer on a pedestal (“good husbandman, good farmer”) in light of the instructions that follow (e.g. treating slave-workers as dehumanized “tools”). 7. (Catullus 7) a. Catullus, Poem b. poem’s speaker/Catullus c. one of Catullus’ nugatory love poems addressed to his beloved Lesbia d. some possible talking points for elaboration: 1. “kissimizations” is an example of C.’s many creative (and comic here) word coinages; 2. the straightforward “as many stars in the sky” simile stands in sharp contrast to the learned Alexandrian one about specifically Libyan sands (“Battus” alludes to Callimachus); 3. the wish to confuse meddlers/kiss-accountants marks the poem’s stance against Roman traditional values (cf. moral censuring). 8. (Lucretius, On the Nature of Things 1.926ff.) a. Lucretius, On the Nature of Things b. Lucretius/speaker of poem c. Lucretius discusses the challenges of introducing philosophy/teaching ”hard science” to average readers d. some possible talking points for elaboration: 1. after the manner of the Alexandrian Callimachus, Lucretius asserts that his poetic journey is fresh and original, even claiming that he is the first Latin poet to write of science/philosophy in verse; 2. as Book 1 comes to its close, the light-bestowing, evangelical Lucretius reasserts his primary aim, i.e. to liberate humankind from “the narrow bonds of religion”; 3. Lucretius here gives his fullest justification for choosing poetry (traditionally associated with myth, deception, etc.) over prose—just a spoonful of the Muses makes the medicine of philosophy go down (easier). 9. (Cicero, Letter 166) a. Cicero, Letters b. the letter’s speaker/Cicero c. Cicero is writing to Brutus as his own life and the failing republican cause are coming to an end d. some possible talking points for elaboration: 1. the letter is socio-historically significant, as it attests to the influence of Brutus’ mother in political events of great moment; 2. the letter is the last known of Cicero’s collection, and captures his last tragic efforts to preserve the traditional oligarchical system of (senatorial) government; 3. as is the case for many letters, Cicero effectively mixes discussion of momentous political events with personal matters (note here his pledge to protect Brutus’ sister’s children). The exam is worth 168 Total Points. Scores are computed and recorded on D2L as a percentage. .
Recommended publications
  • Storytelling and Community: Beyond the Origins of the Ancient
    STORYTELLING AND COMMUNITY: BEYOND THE ORIGINS OF THE ANCIENT THEATRE, GREEK AND ROMAN by Sarah Kellis Jennings Submitted in partial fulfillment of the requirements for Departmental Honors in the Department of Theatre Texas Christian University Fort Worth, Texas May 3, 2013 ii STORYTELLING AND COMMUNITY: BEYOND THE ORIGINS OF THE ANCIENT THEATRE, GREEK AND ROMAN Project Approved: T.J. Walsh, Ph.D. Department of Theatre (Supervising Professor) Harry Parker, Ph.D. Department of Theatre Kindra Santamaria, Ph.D. Department of Modern Language Studies iii TABLE OF CONTENTS ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS ................................................................................................iv INTRODUCTION ...............................................................................................................1 GREEK THEATRE .............................................................................................................1 The Dithyramb ................................................................................................................2 Grecian Tragedy .............................................................................................................4 The Greek Actor ............................................................................................................. 8 The Satyr Play ................................................................................................................9 The Greek Theatre Structure and Technical Flourishes ...............................................10 Grecian
    [Show full text]
  • The Reflection of Ancient Greek and Roman Theaters in Today's Culture
    International Journal of Arts Humanities and Social Sciences Studies Volume 5 Issue 7 ǁ July 2020 ISSN: 2582-1601 www.ijahss.com The Reflection Of Ancient Greek And Roman Theaters In 1 Today’s Culture Of Humor Tahsin Emre FIRAT Dr., Atatürk University, ORCID Numbers: 0000-0002-7384-2853 Abstract: Today’s humor culture substantially originates from theatrical genres which had displayed during the ancient period. Tragedy, comedy and satire examples which had come to the forefront in the Roman and Greek cultures during the ancient era give clues about the cultural structure of the era. These theatrical genres containing solemnity, satire, sarcasm and irony reflect tragic and humorous elements of the Ancient Roman and Greek culture. Fabula Crepidata / tragoedia, Fabula Praetexta (ta), Fabula Palliata /comoedia, Fabula Togata / tabernaria, Fabula Atellana, Mimus / planipes and Pantomimus are among the examples of the Ancient Roman and Greek theatrical culture. This study which will examine the aforementioned theatrical genres of the ancient period consists of a literature review. This study investigates the above-mentioned theatrical genres and their relation to today’s culture of humor, with a focus on the historical transformation of performance-based culture of humor. Keywords: Humor, satire, ancient theatre. I. Introduction Ancient Greek and Rome are the civilizations where the theatrical culture and thus humor were appreciated immensely. Dionysus carnivals and Aristophanes comedies emerged in these cultures. In this context, it is necessary to consider theatrical genres that were displayed during the Ancient Greek and Roman era in order to interpret the verbal humor culture and its relationship with drama.
    [Show full text]
  • Three Theories of the Origin of the Commedia Dell'arte
    THREE THEORIES OF THE ORIGIN OF THE COMMEDIA DELL' ARTE by NANCY KAY PENNELL B.A., McPherson College, 1986 A REPORT submitted in partial fulfillment of the requirements for the degree MASTER OF ARTS SPEECH KANSAS STATE UNIVERSITY Manhattan, Kansas 1989 Approved by: Major Professor \J) AllEDfl 3QS057 TABLE OF CONTENTS Acknowledgements li Chapter I : INTRODUCTION 1 Chapter II: THE COMMEDIA DELL' ARTE 3 Chapter III: THE FABULA ATELLANA THEORY 7 Chapter IV: THE MIME THEORY ' 49 Chapter V: THE MOUNTEBANK THEORY 67 Chapter VI : CONCLUSION 72 Chapter VII: WORKS CONSULTED 74 ACKNOWLEDGMENTS I would like to thank Dr. Lewis Shelton and Dr. Carl Hinrichs for sacrificing their valuable time to serve on my graduate committee and for their support through my years at Kansas State. Thanks, too, to Dr. Norman Fedder for his encouragement and enthusiasm for this project. To my parents, Bill and Grace Pennell, I extend deep gratitude and love for their support and for their unfailing belief in my abilities. Also, thanks to Sean Dwyer, for his tolerance, his encouragement, his advice, and his assurances that this project could be completed. Special thanks to my major professor, Dr. Harold J. Nichols, whom I admire greatly and without whose help this report would not have become a reality. ii I INTRODUCTION Bright colors, comic characters, rude comments, and the crack of a slapstick were all elements of the commedia dell'arte of mid-sixteenth century Italy. This lively, improvised form of entertainment was extremely popular with both the upper and lower classes. There are numerous facts available regarding the commedla's characters, some plotlines and titles, costumes, masks, and comic business, but there are no definite facts regarding its origin.
    [Show full text]
  • Front Matter
    Cambridge University Press 978-0-521-11016-7 - Roman Republican Theatre Gesine Manuwald Frontmatter More information ROMAN REPUBLICAN THEATRE Theatre flourished in the Roman Republic, dramatic works of the period including the tragedies of Ennius and Pacuvius, the comedies of Plautus and Terence as well as the mimes of Laberius. Yet apart from the surviving plays of Plautus and Terence the sources are fragmen- tary and difficult to interpret and contextualize. This book provides an up-to-date and comprehensive overview of all aspects of the topic, incorporating recent findings and modern approaches. It discusses the origins of Roman drama and the historical, social and institu- tional backgrounds of all the dramatic genres to be found during the Republic (tragedy, praetexta,comedy,togata, Atellana, mime and pan- tomime). Possible general characteristics are identified, and attention is paid to the nature of the various dramatic genres and their develop- ment. The clear structure and full bibliography also ensure that the book has value as a source of reference for all upper-level students and scholars of Latin literature and ancient drama. gesine manuwald is Senior Lecturer in Latin Language and Literature at University College London. Her research interests cover Cicero’s orations, Flavian epic and Neo-Latin literature, on which she has published several books and many articles. Her main focus of research is Roman drama. She has written extensively on the subject, including several articles on Roman comedy, a book on fabulae prae- textae,
    [Show full text]
  • Die Römische Komödie – Gattungsüberblick
    Ludwig-Maximilians-Universität München, Institut für Klassische Philologie Lateinischer Interpretationskurs Kursleitung: Prof. Dr. Janka Referentin: Linda Morent 26.Oktober 2012 Die römische Komödie – Gattungsüberblick Ausgangslage: - Drama steht am Anfang der römischen Literaturgeschichte - Gattungen Drama: Komödie – fabula palliata (griechisches Milieu) fabula togata (römisches Milieu) fabula trabeata (ritterliches Milieu, trabea = kaiserliche Staatstoga für Ritterstand) Tragödie – tragoedia crepidata/cothurnata (griechisches Milieu) tragoedia praetexta (römisches Milieu) Die Wegbereiter: Livius Andronicus Naevius ca. zur gleichen Zeit: 3.Jhd.v.Chr. Ennius eine Generation später Gemeinsamkeiten: alle drei nicht-römische Bürger aus Süditalien Werk beschränkt sich nicht auf eine einzige Gattung (jeder: ein Epos, mehrere Tragödien & Komödien) griechische Vorbilder inhaltlicher Schwerpunkt: trojanischer Sagenkreis mit Bezug auf Rom (v.a. Tragödie) Entwicklung der Komödie: - zugleich mit Tragödie in Rom eingeführt - Vorbild: v.a. griechische Neue Komödie (v.a. Menander) 1 - vorliterarische Phase: Stegreifformen und volkstümliche Lustspiele satirische, derbe Scherze bei Gelegenheit von Triumphzügen und Hochzeiten (Feszenninen) Atellanen = improvisiertes Laienspiel aus Süditalien mit vier festen personae sizilischer Mimus Volksposse werden dann literarisiert und institutionalisiert Charakteristika: - große Stereotypizität der Figurenrollen - Distanz zu zeitgenössischen politischen und gesellschaftlichen Verhältnissen - Einführung von
    [Show full text]
  • Copyright of Methuen Drama, 2020
    CHAPTER ONE Form GESINE MANUWALD 2020 INTRODUCTION Drama, “Ancient comedy” is a modern term covering a wide range of distinct varieties of “comic” (light) drama occurring in different periods and places throughout the ancient world. Ancient scholars since Aristotle have tried to defi ne “comedy” more precisely (Arist. Poet. 2.1448a16–18; 5.1449a31–b9), despite numerous differences between these attempts:Methuen “comedy” is seen as a dramatic genre involving characters of lower statusof and presenting fi ctional stories.1 In the Hellenistic period the Greek comic poet Antiphanes famously has a character distinguish between tragedy and comedy by saying that tragedy is blessed since audiences know the stories while comic poets have to invent everything (Antiphanes, fr. 189 K.-A.; English translation in Rusten 2011 : 506–7). In terms of authorship, earlyCopyright Roman playwrights produced both comedies and tragedies; but from the time these genres had established themselves in Rome and in Greece, there was a separation between serious and light dramatic genres, so that playwrights only produced works of one type. 2 This survey will look at the various forms of “comedy” in roughly chronological order. Such a structure implies a distinction between Greek and Roman manifestations as well as between the main historical and literary periods. For each phase the major varieties of comedy, their standard format (and deviations) as well as formal characteristics of key representatives will be mentioned. The overview will start with classical Greece ( c. fi fth century), when comedies performed at the regular Athenian festivals are attested for the fi rst time, and then move to Hellenistic Greece (c.
    [Show full text]
  • Family Relations of Stock Characters in Atellan Farce – a Few Remarks on the Influence of Palliata on Atellana
    Graeco-Latina Brunensia 21 / 2016 / 2 DOI: 10.5817/GLB2016-2-17 Family Relations of Stock Characters in Atellan Farce – a Few Remarks on the Influence of Palliata on Atellana Joanna Pieczonka (University of Wrocław) ČLÁNKY / ARTICLES Abstract The article presents possible relationships between two types of Roman comedy: palliata and Atellana; it focuses especially on the influence of palliata on the literary Atellan farce in the field of stock characters. The subject of this paper are family figures, i.e.uxor , senex, adulescens, virgo, servi. There are two kinds of evidence for these personae dramatis having been bor- rowed into Atellana – the plays, titles and fragments. All of these aspects are analysed in con- junction with relevant passages from palliata. It appears that Atellana employs all of the family masks with their specific features but at the same time often transforms them, exaggerating their sexual actions and using more terms of abuse in their depiction. The author gives English translations for the quoted Atellana fragments. Keywords palliata; Atellana; Pomponius Bononiensis; Novius; stock characters Atellana was staged in Italy for over eight centuries. Perhaps the first impromptu perfor- mances of this kind began in the 4th century BC in Atella (Liv. 12, 12, 2; Cic. Fam. 7, 1, 3; Tac. Ann. 4, 14) and the last performances occurred possibly in the 4th century AD (Ar- nobius, Adversus nationes 7, 33; st. Jerome, Epistula 52, 2). In the meantime other types of comedies were presented on Roman stages; e.g. fabula palliata was first performed in the year of 240 BC.
    [Show full text]
  • Repertoire of Characters in Roman Comedy: New Classification Approaches
    GRAECO-LATINA BRUNENSIA 19, 2014, 2 ŠÁRKA HURBÁNKOVÁ (MASARYK UNIVERSITY, BRNO) REPERTOIRE OF CHARACTERS IN ROMAN COMEDY: NEW CLASSIFICATION APPROACHES What is Roman comedy? Which ancient theatre forms can be included under this term? How to classify the characters of palliatae, togatae, atellanae and mimi, having mostly complete texts of Plautus’s and Terence’s palliatae available on the one hand, and palliatae, togatae, atellanae and mimi preserved only fragmentally on the other? This study presents a method of classifying a repertoire of characters in Roman comedy which I used in my disserta- tion. Complete texts were analyzed in terms of contrasts and correspondences, allowing me to determine the correspondences and similarities not only among dramatic characters or types separately in Plautus’s and separately in Terence’s comedies, but also point out certain correspondences and similarities in the entire historical corpus of texts mapping a specific period or genre. Therefore, I determined structural functions of individual types and their roles in the corpus of texts, which, at the same time, provided me with a summary of typical traits of various types of characters, manifested in antagonism or cooperation with other types of characters. I compared this set of “words-signs” with words describing the characters from fragments, using clear arrangement into contingency tables. Due to this comparison and other partial findings enabled by this method and tools used, it was possible to describe, at least partially, not only a repertoire of characters of individual comic forms, but also compare them with each other and determine how the “dramatis personae” of Ro- man comedy changed diachronically.
    [Show full text]
  • Plautus and Terence in Their Roman Contexts
    1 GESINE MANUWALD Plautus and Terence in Their Roman Contexts Introduction Scenic productions formed a significant element of Roman festival culture from its inception. Literary versions of such performances came into being with the adoption of the dramatic genres of tragedy and comedy from Greece; soon, further dramatic genres established themselves. Out of the great number of plays written over the centuries only a few have been preserved in full: from the Republican period there are comedies by Plautus and Terence; from imperial times there are tragedies and one fabula prae- texta transmitted under Seneca’s name. It is no surprise then that works by Plautus, Terence, and Seneca have received the greatest attention; but their historical, social, and literary contexts have not always been adequately taken into account. Even though modern recipients will never be able to approach Roman dramas in the same way as original audiences did, attempts at appreciating these plays within their historical framework are possible. With regard to the comedies of Plautus and Terence from the Republican period, this means that they have to be placed within the context of their dramatic genre, which covers, beyond the two well-known playwrights, a large number of poets over an extended period of time. These dramas should also be seen within the context of other dramatic genres and of Republican literature more gener- ally, of their historical and social settings, and of the performance conditions as determined by organisational structures and audience reception. This chapter will look at these framing contexts, which mutually condition each other (on Roman vs.
    [Show full text]
  • Terence and Interpretation
    Terence and Interpretation Pierides Studies in Greek and Latin Literature Series Editors: Philip Hardie and Stratis Kyriakidis Volume I Stratis Kyriakidis, Catalogues of Proper Names in Latin Epic Poetry: Lucretius – Virgil – Ovid Volume II Antonis Petrides and Sophia Papaioannou (eds), New Perspectives on Postclassical Comedy Volume III Myrto Garani and David Konstan (eds), The Philosophizing Muse: The Influence of Greek Philosophy on Roman Poetry Pierides Studies in Greek and Latin Literature Volume IV Terence and Interpretation Edited by Sophia Papaioannou Terence and Interpretation, Edited by Sophia Papaioannou This book first published 2014 Cambridge Scholars Publishing 12 Back Chapman Street, Newcastle upon Tyne, NE6 2XX, UK British Library Cataloguing in Publication Data A catalogue record for this book is available from the British Library Copyright © 2014 by Sophia Papaioannou and contributors All rights for this book reserved. No part of this book may be reproduced, stored in a retrieval system, or transmitted, in any form or by any means, electronic, mechanical, photocopying, recording or otherwise, without the prior permission of the copyright owner. ISBN (10): 1-4438-6385-8, ISBN (13): 978-1-4438-6385-8 TABLE OF CONTENTS ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS ............................................................................... vii CONTRIBUTORS ........................................................................................... ix INTRODUCTION ............................................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • Download Drama.Pdf
    Drama 1 Drama Literature Major forms • Novel • Poem • Drama • Short story • Novella Genres • Comedy • Drama • Epic • Erotic • Nonsense • Lyric • Mythopoeia • Romance • Satire • Tragedy • Tragicomedy Media • Performance (play) • Book Techniques • Prose • Verse History and lists • Outline of literature • Glossary of terms • History (modern) • Books • Writers • Literary / Poetry awards Discussion Drama 2 • Criticism • Theory • Sociology • Magazines Literature portal Drama is the specific mode of fiction represented in performance.[1] The term comes from a Greek word meaning "action" (Classical Greek: δρᾶμα, drama), which is derived from the verb meaning "to do" or "to act" (Classical Greek: δράω, draō). The enactment of drama in theatre, performed by actors on a stage before an audience, presupposes collaborative modes of production and a collective form of reception. The structure of dramatic texts, unlike other forms of literature, is directly influenced by this collaborative production and collective reception.[2] The early modern tragedy Hamlet (1601) by Shakespeare and the classical Athenian tragedy Oedipus the King (c. 429 BCE) by Sophocles are among the masterpieces of the art of drama.[3] A modern example is Long Day's Journey into Night by Eugene O’Neill (1956).[4] The two masks associated with drama represent the traditional generic division between comedy and tragedy. They are symbols of the ancient Greek Muses, Thalia and Melpomene. Thalia was the Muse of comedy (the laughing face), while Melpomene was the Muse of tragedy (the weeping face). Considered as a genre of poetry in general, the dramatic mode has been contrasted with the epic and the lyrical modes ever since Aristotle's Poetics (c.
    [Show full text]