DOCSLIB.ORG

Project A5 - Exploring the Status of Australia’S Hammerhead Sharks Project Leader: Michelle Heupel AIMS (William White CSIRO, Andrew Chin & Colin Simpfendorfer, JCU)

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Project A5 - Exploring the Status of Australia’S Hammerhead Sharks Project Leader: Michelle Heupel AIMS (William White CSIRO, Andrew Chin & Colin Simpfendorfer, JCU) Project A5 - Exploring the status of Australia’s hammerhead sharks Project Leader: Michelle Heupel AIMS (William White CSIRO, Andrew Chin & Colin Simpfendorfer, JCU) Research Plan 1 - 2015 Progress report to 30 December 2015 Enquiries should be addressed to: Michelle Heupel, Australian Institute of Marine Science [email protected] Distribution list Nic Bax Annabel Ozimec Copyright This report is licensed by the University of Tasmania for use under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 Australia Licence. For licence conditions, see https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ Acknowledgement This work was undertaken for the Marine Biodiversity Hub, a collaborative partnership supported through funding from the Australian Government’s National Environmental Research Program (NESP). NESP Marine Biodiversity Hub partners include the University of Tasmania; CSIRO, Geoscience Australia, Australian Institute of Marine Science, Museum Victoria, Charles Darwin University, the University of Western Australia, Integrated Marine Observing System, NSW Office of Environment and Heritage, NSW Department of Primary Industries. Important Disclaimer The NESP Marine Biodiversity Hub advises that the information contained in this publication comprises general statements based on scientific research. The reader is advised and needs to be aware that such information may be incomplete or unable to be used in any specific situation. No reliance or actions must therefore be made on that information without seeking prior expert professional, scientific and technical advice. To the extent permitted by law, the NESP Marine Biodiversity Hub (including its host organisation, employees, partners and consultants) excludes all liability to any person for any consequences, including but not limited to all losses, damages, costs, expenses and any other compensation, arising directly or indirectly from using this publication (in part or in whole) and any information or material contained in it. Contents PROJECT SUMMARY ................................................................................................. 1 1. Background ....................................................................................................... 1 2. Aims ................................................................................................................... 2 3. Approach ........................................................................................................... 2 4. Results ............................................................................................................... 3 Fisheries review............................................................................ 3 5. Identification issues .......................................................................................... 7 6. Life history ......................................................................................................... 9 7. Distribution ...................................................................................................... 10 Scalloped and Great Hammerheads ........................................... 10 8. Regional Distributions .................................................................................... 11 Western Australia ....................................................................... 11 Northern Territory ....................................................................... 18 Queensland ................................................................................ 18 Papua New Guinea .................................................................... 25 Indonesia .................................................................................... 25 9. Other data ........................................................................................................ 29 Winghead sharks ........................................................................ 30 10. Stock structure hypotheses for scalloped hammerheads ........................... 36 11. Conclusions ..................................................................................................... 40 ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS .......................................................................................... 42 REFERENCES ........................................................................................................... 43 List of Figures Figure 1. Fishery catch of S. lewini, S. mokarran, and S. zygaena (from top to bottom) extracted from Koopman and Knuckey (2014). Fishery abbreviations: ECIFF = East Coast Inshore Finfish Fishery (Qld), ONLF = Offshore Net and Line Fishery (NT), NSF = Northern Shark Fishery (WA), ETBF = Eastern Tuna and Billfish Fishery (Commonwealth), GoCIFF = Gulf of Carpentaria Inshore Finfish Fishery (Qld), TDGDLF = Temperate Demersal Gillnet and Demersal Longline Fishery (WA), SESSF = Southern and Eastern Scalefish and Shark Fishery (Commonwealth), MSF = Marine Scalefish Fishery (SA). ................................................................................... 5 Figure 2. Ten year time series of shark catch (CPUE) from northwestern Australia, extracted from Heupel and McAuley (2007). Hammerhead catch is shown in panel b. ............... 6 Figure 3. Total catch of CITES listed sharks in Australia indicating S. lewini (scalloped hammerhead) has the largest take. Extracted from Koopman and Knuckey (2014). ... 6 Figure 4. Images of scalloped (S. lewini), great (S. mokarran) and winghead (E. blochii) after fishery capture from top to bottom. Images supplied by W. White. ............................... 8 Figure 5. Dorsal fins from three hammerhead shark species after removal by fishers. Note the similarities in height and fin shape which distinguish these species from other sharks, but make species identification within the group difficult. Images provided by W. White. ............................................................................................................................. 8 Figure 6. Location data used to define the distribution of hammerhead sharks for: a) S. lewini and b) S. mokarran. Map data ©2015 Google ............................................................ 12 Figure 7. Distribution of: a-c) scalloped hammerhed (S. lewini) and d-f) great hammerhed sharks (S. mokarran) for the different sex and size categories: a, d) adult females, b, e) adult males, c, f) immature and neonate individuals of both sexes. Map data ©2015 Google ......................................................................................................................... 13 Figure 8. Size frequency a) S. lewini and b) S. mokarran in Australian waters by sex. Dashed lines represent corresponding size at maturity for each sex and species. .................. 14 Figure 9. Distribution of scalloped hammerhed sharks (S. lewini) in Western Australia where green indicates adult females, blue indicates adult males, yellow and pink indicate immature and neonate individuals of both sexes respectively. Map data ©2015 Google ......................................................................................................................... 15 Figure 10. Distribution of great hammerhed sharks (S. mokarran) in Western Australia where green indicates adult females, blue indicates adult males, yellow indicates immature individuals of both sexes. Map data ©2015 Google .................................................... 16 Figure 11. Size frequency of individuals encountered in Western Australia by sex for a) S. lewini and b) S. mokarran. Dashed lines represent corresponding size at maturity for each sex and species. ................................................................................................. 17 Figure 12. Distribution of scalloped hammerhed sharks (S. lewini) in Northtern Territory where green indicates adult females, blue indicates adult males, yellow and pink indicate immature and neonate individuals of both sexes. Map data ©2015 Google ............... 19 Figure 13. Distribution of great hammerhed sharks (S. mokarran) in Northern Territory where green indicates adult females, blue indicates adult males, yellow indicates immature individuals of both sexes. Map data ©2015 Google ................................................... 20 Figure 14. Size frequency of individuals encountered in Northern Territory by sex for a) S. lewini and b) S. mokarran. Dashed lines represent corresponding size at maturity for each sex and species. ................................................................................................. 21 Figure 15. Distribution of scalloped hammerhed sharks (S. lewini) in Queensland where blue indicates adult males, yellow and pink indicate immature and neonate individuals of both sexes. Note no adult females were present in the data set. Map data ©2015 Google ......................................................................................................................... 22 Figure 16. Distribution of great hammerhed sharks (S. mokarran) in Queensland where green indicates adult females, blue indicates adult males, yellow indicates immature individuals of both sexes. Map data ©2015 Google .................................................... 23 Figure 17. Size frequency of individuals encountered in Queensland by sex for a) S. lewini and b) S. mokarran. Dashed lines represent corresponding size at maturity for each sex and species. ................................................................................................................. 24 Figure 18. Distribution
Load more

Recommended publications
  • Malaysia National Plan of Action for the Conservation and Management of Shark (Plan2)
    MALAYSIA NATIONAL PLAN OF ACTION FOR THE CONSERVATION AND MANAGEMENT OF SHARK (PLAN2) DEPARTMENT OF FISHERIES MINISTRY OF AGRICULTURE AND AGRO-BASED INDUSTRY MALAYSIA 2014 First Printing, 2014 Copyright Department of Fisheries Malaysia, 2014 All Rights Reserved. No part of this publication may be reproduced or transmitted in any form or by any means, electronic, mechanical, including photocopy, recording, or any information storage and retrieval system, without prior permission in writing from the Department of Fisheries Malaysia. Published in Malaysia by Department of Fisheries Malaysia Ministry of Agriculture and Agro-based Industry Malaysia, Level 1-6, Wisma Tani Lot 4G2, Precinct 4, 62628 Putrajaya Malaysia Telephone No. : 603 88704000 Fax No. : 603 88891233 E-mail : [email protected] Website : http://dof.gov.my Perpustakaan Negara Malaysia Cataloguing-in-Publication Data ISBN 978-983-9819-99-1 This publication should be cited as follows: Department of Fisheries Malaysia, 2014. Malaysia National Plan of Action for the Conservation and Management of Shark (Plan 2), Ministry of Agriculture and Agro- based Industry Malaysia, Putrajaya, Malaysia. 50pp SUMMARY Malaysia has been very supportive of the International Plan of Action for Sharks (IPOA-SHARKS) developed by FAO that is to be implemented voluntarily by countries concerned. This led to the development of Malaysia’s own National Plan of Action for the Conservation and Management of Shark or NPOA-Shark (Plan 1) in 2006. The successful development of Malaysia’s second National Plan of Action for the Conservation and Management of Shark (Plan 2) is a manifestation of her renewed commitment to the continuous improvement of shark conservation and management measures in Malaysia.
    [Show full text]
  • Enhanced Visual Fields in Hammerhead Sharks
    4010 The Journal of Experimental Biology 212, 4010-4018 Published by The Company of Biologists 2009 doi:10.1242/jeb.032615 Enhanced visual fields in hammerhead sharks D. M. McComb1,*, T. C. Tricas2 and S. M. Kajiura1 1Biological Sciences, Florida Atlantic University, Boca Raton, FL 33431, USA and 2Department of Zoology and Hawaii Institute of Marine Biology, University of Hawaii at Manoa, Honolulu, HI 96822, USA *Author for correspondence ([email protected]) Accepted 9 September 2009 SUMMARY Several factors that influence the evolution of the unusual head morphology of hammerhead sharks (family Sphyrnidae) are proposed but few are empirically tested. In this study we tested the ‘enhanced binocular field’ hypothesis (that proposes enhanced frontal binocularity) by comparison of the visual fields of three hammerhead species: the bonnethead shark, Sphyrna tiburo, the scalloped hammerhead shark, Sphyrna lewini, and the winghead shark, Eusphyra blochii, with that of two carcharhinid species: the lemon shark, Negaprion brevirostris, and the blacknose shark, Carcharhinus acronotus. Additionally, eye rotation and head yaw were quantified to determine if species compensate for large blind areas anterior to the head. The winghead shark possessed the largest anterior binocular overlap (48deg.) and was nearly four times larger than that of the lemon (10deg.) and blacknose (11deg.) sharks. The binocular overlap in the scalloped hammerhead sharks (34deg.) was greater than the bonnethead sharks (13deg.) and carcharhinid species; however, the bonnethead shark did not differ from the carcharhinids. These results indicate that binocular overlap has increased with lateral head expansion in hammerhead sharks. The hammerhead species did not demonstrate greater eye rotation in the anterior or posterior direction.
    [Show full text]
  • The Bonnethead (Sphyrna Tiburo) and the Scalloped Hammerhead (Sphyrna Lewini) Sarah L
    © 2017. Published by The Company of Biologists Ltd | Journal of Experimental Biology (2017) 220, 3336-3343 doi:10.1242/jeb.157941 RESEARCH ARTICLE Regional variation in undulatory kinematics of two hammerhead species: the bonnethead (Sphyrna tiburo) and the scalloped hammerhead (Sphyrna lewini) Sarah L. Hoffmann1,*, Steven M. Warren2 and Marianne E. Porter1 ABSTRACT blochii), possesses a cephalofoil that is proportionally the largest Hammerhead sharks (Sphyrnidae) exhibit a large amount of and measures up to 50% of their total body length (Lim et al., 2010). morphological variation within the family, making them the focus of In comparison, the bonnethead shark (Sphyrna tiburo) is the most many studies. The size of the laterally expanded head, or cephalofoil, is recently derived species and their cephalofoil width is 18% of total inversely correlated with pectoral fin area. The inverse relationship body length. Generally, as cephalofoil width increases among between cephalofoil and pectoral fin size in this family suggests that they species, pectoral fin area decreases (Thomson and Simanek, 1977). might serve a complementary role in lift generation. The cephalofoil is Previous studies on hammerhead sharks have focused primarily on also hypothesized to increase olfaction, electroreception and vision; cephalofoil morphology and its effects on hydrodynamics and however, little is known about how morphological variation impacts post- sensory efficiency; however, little is known about the morphology cranial swimming kinematics. Previous studies demonstrate that the and function of the post-cranial body. The significant bonnethead and scalloped hammerhead have significantly different yaw morphological variation and the close phylogenetic relationship amplitude, and we hypothesized that these species utilize varied among hammerheads make them an ideal study system to examine frequency and amplitude of undulation along the body.
    [Show full text]
  • The Social Lives of Hammerheads. Authors: De Maddalena, Alessandro; Buttigieg, Alexander Publication: World and I Online Date: Jun 1, 2006
    The social lives of hammerheads. Authors: De Maddalena, Alessandro; Buttigieg, Alexander Publication: World and I Online Date: Jun 1, 2006 Hammerhead sharks form the family of Sphyrnidae, that includes eight species: the winghead shark (Eusphyra blochii), scalloped bonnethead (Sphyrna corona), scalloped hammerhead (S. lewini), scoophead shark (S. media), great hammerhead (S. mokarran), bonnethead shark (S. tiburo), golden hammerhead (S. tudes) and the smooth hammerhead (S. zygaena). In the hammerhead shark, the front part of the head is flattened dorsoventrally and laterally increased to form what we call the "cephalofoil," or two wide flattened expansions that constitute the characteristic shape of a hammer. These two expansions are made out of muscular and connective tissues supported by a cartilaginous skeleton that is an integrated part of the skull. The round shaped eyes are placed very wide apart at the two lateral extremities of these expansions. Also placed at the front margin of these lateral expansions are the nostrils. The "hammer" or cephalofoil of the hammerheads unfolds into a series of functions correlated to the movement and the predation of these sharks. It has been observed that hammerhead sharks posses a very highly developed brain, and perhaps this could be the reason for the ability to lead the social life particular to these animals. Without a doubt, the most surprising aspect of socialization in hammerhead sharks is that of the immensely huge gatherings that different species form in numerous geographical areas. These gatherings could be formed from resident populations in that area or can be composed of individuals that migrate in masses. Huge gatherings of scalloped hammerhead sharks have been observed at the Sea of Cortez, near the Galapagos Island, near Cocos Island (Costa Rica), Malpelo (Columbia), and San Salvador (Bahamas), Hawaii, the Red Sea, Natal (South Africa), in Australia, the China Sea and near Cabilao Island (Philippines).
    [Show full text]
  • Species Composition of the Largest Shark Fin Retail-Market in Mainland
    www.nature.com/scientificreports OPEN Species composition of the largest shark fn retail‑market in mainland China Diego Cardeñosa1,2*, Andrew T. Fields1, Elizabeth A. Babcock3, Stanley K. H. Shea4, Kevin A. Feldheim5 & Demian D. Chapman6 Species‑specifc monitoring through large shark fn market surveys has been a valuable data source to estimate global catches and international shark fn trade dynamics. Hong Kong and Guangzhou, mainland China, are the largest shark fn markets and consumption centers in the world. We used molecular identifcation protocols on randomly collected processed fn trimmings (n = 2000) and non‑ parametric species estimators to investigate the species composition of the Guangzhou retail market and compare the species diversity between the Guangzhou and Hong Kong shark fn retail markets. Species diversity was similar between both trade hubs with a small subset of species dominating the composition. The blue shark (Prionace glauca) was the most common species overall followed by the CITES‑listed silky shark (Carcharhinus falciformis), scalloped hammerhead shark (Sphyrna lewini), smooth hammerhead shark (S. zygaena) and shortfn mako shark (Isurus oxyrinchus). Our results support previous indications of high connectivity between the shark fn markets of Hong Kong and mainland China and suggest that systematic studies of other fn trade hubs within Mainland China and stronger law‑enforcement protocols and capacity building are needed. Many shark populations have declined in the last four decades, mainly due to overexploitation to supply the demand for their fns in Asia and meat in many other countries 1–4. Mainland China was historically the world’s second largest importer of shark fns and foremost consumer of shark fn soup, yet very little is known about the species composition of shark fns in this trade hub2.
    [Show full text]
  • Olfactory Morphology of Carcharhinid and Sphyrnid Sharks: Does the Cephalofoil Confer a Sensory Advantage?
    JOURNAL OF MORPHOLOGY 264:253–263 (2005) Olfactory Morphology of Carcharhinid and Sphyrnid Sharks: Does the Cephalofoil Confer a Sensory Advantage? Stephen M. Kajiura,1* Jesica B. Forni,2 and Adam P. Summers2 1Department of Biological Sciences, Florida Atlantic University, Boca Raton, Florida 33431 2Ecology and Evolutionary Biology, University of California, Irvine, California 92697 ABSTRACT Many hypotheses have been advanced to eses fall into three categories: 1) enhanced olfactory explain the adaptive significance of the sphyrnid cephalo- klinotaxis, 2) increased olfactory acuity, and 3) foil, including potential advantages of spacing the olfac- larger sampling swath of the surrounding medium. tory organs at the distal tips of the broad surface. We To put these hypotheses into a quantifiable con- employed comparative morphology to test whether the text, consider the probability that an odorant mole- sphyrnid cephalofoil provides better stereo-olfaction, in- creases olfactory acuity, and samples a greater volume of cule binds to a receptor in the nasal rosette. The the medium compared to the situation in carcharhiniform number of odorant molecules that cross the olfactory sharks. The broadly spaced nares provide sphyrnid spe- epithelium is: cies with a significantly greater separation between the olfactory rosettes, which could lead to an enhanced ability N˙ (moles secϪ1) ϭ C(moles cmϪ3) to resolve odor gradients. In addition, most sphyrnid spe- 2 Ϫ1 cies possess prenarial grooves that greatly increase the An(cm )V(cm sec ) (1) volume of water sampled by the nares and thus increase the probability of odorant encounter. However, despite a where C is the concentration of odor molecules, An is much greater head width, and a significantly greater the area sampled by the naris, and V is the velocity number of olfactory lamellae, scalloped hammerhead of odorant over the olfactory rosette (Fig.
    [Show full text]
  • And Their Functional, Ecological, and Evolutionary Implications
    DePaul University Via Sapientiae College of Science and Health Theses and Dissertations College of Science and Health Spring 6-14-2019 Body Forms in Sharks (Chondrichthyes: Elasmobranchii), and Their Functional, Ecological, and Evolutionary Implications Phillip C. Sternes DePaul University, [email protected] Follow this and additional works at: https://via.library.depaul.edu/csh_etd Part of the Biology Commons Recommended Citation Sternes, Phillip C., "Body Forms in Sharks (Chondrichthyes: Elasmobranchii), and Their Functional, Ecological, and Evolutionary Implications" (2019). College of Science and Health Theses and Dissertations. 327. https://via.library.depaul.edu/csh_etd/327 This Thesis is brought to you for free and open access by the College of Science and Health at Via Sapientiae. It has been accepted for inclusion in College of Science and Health Theses and Dissertations by an authorized administrator of Via Sapientiae. For more information, please contact [email protected]. Body Forms in Sharks (Chondrichthyes: Elasmobranchii), and Their Functional, Ecological, and Evolutionary Implications A Thesis Presented in Partial Fulfilment of the Requirements for the Degree of Master of Science June 2019 By Phillip C. Sternes Department of Biological Sciences College of Science and Health DePaul University Chicago, Illinois Table of Contents Table of Contents.............................................................................................................................ii List of Tables..................................................................................................................................iv
    [Show full text]
  • (Carcharhinus Longimanus) , Is an Oceanic Shark Found in Tropical And
    24 The state of world highly migratory, straddling and other high seas fishery resources and associated species Whitetip shark (Carcharhinus longimanus), is an oceanic shark found in tropical and warm-temperate waters of the Atlantic, possibly in the Mediterranean Sea, in the western Indian Ocean and in the Pacific. It is usually found far offshore in the open sea but it sometimes occurs in water as shallow as 37 m inshore, particularly off oceanic islands or in continental areas where the shelf is very narrow. It is regularly caught with pelagic longlines, also handlines and occasionally pelagic and even bottom trawls. It is utilized fresh, smoked and dried salted for human consumption, for hides, for fins (processed into the ingredients for shark-fin soup), and for liver oil (extracted for vitamins) and fishmeal. Although it is one of the most common oceanic FIGURE 22 sharks, recorded catches total Blue shark (Prionace glauca) only 187 tonnes in 2004. Blue shark (Prionace glauca) (Figure 22), has a worldwide distribution in temperate and tropical oceanic waters. It is one of the most abundant and the most heavily fished shark in the world, often as bycatch in pelagic longlines fisheries, but also on hook-and-lines, in pelagic trawls, and even FIGURE 23 bottom trawls near the coasts. Catches of requiem sharks (family Carcharhinidae) In 2004 more than 36 000 as reported to FAO tonnes were recorded. Catches of requiem sharks 100 (Figure 23) reported to FAO Sharks - Carcharhinidae 90 were less than 10 000 tonnes Pacific Ocean 80 in the 1950s, increasing to 40– ) Indian Ocean 50 000 tonnes in the 1960s and 70 Atlantic Ocean 1970s.
    [Show full text]
  • Summary of Information for the Consideration of Non- Detriment Findings for Scalloped, Great and Smooth Hammerhead and Giant and Reef Manta Rays
    Summary of Information for the Consideration of Non- Detriment Findings for Scalloped, Great and Smooth Hammerhead and Giant and Reef Manta Rays Professor Colin Simpfendorfer and Dr Cassandra Rigby Centre for Tropical Fisheries & Aquaculture & College of Science and Engineering James Cook University Queensland 4811 June 2016 Report to CITES Hammerhead and Manta Ray Information Page 1 Table of Contents 1 Background ....................................................................................................................... 6 2 Available Information on Management Context of Hammerheads and Manta Rays ...... 7 2.1 Global level information ............................................................................................ 7 2.1.1 Reported global catch........................................................................................ 7 2.1.2 Species distribution ........................................................................................... 8 2.1.2.1 Scalloped Hammerhead ................................................................................ 8 2.1.2.2 Great Hammerhead ....................................................................................... 9 2.1.2.3 Smooth Hammerhead ................................................................................. 10 2.1.2.4 Giant Manta Ray .......................................................................................... 11 2.1.2.5 Reef Manta Ray ........................................................................................... 11
    [Show full text]
  • Npoa Shark Working Group
    Perpustakaan Negara Malaysia Cataloguing-in-Publication Data Malaysia national plan of action for the conservation and management of shark (Malaysia NPOA-shark). ISBN 978-983-9114-28-7 1. Sharks--Conservation--Malaysia. 2. Fishery management--Malaysia. 597.309595 Department of Fisheries Malaysia Ministry of Agriculture and Agro-based Industry Malaysia, Level 1-7, Wisma Tani, Lot 4G2, Presint 4, 61628 Putrajaya. Tel: 603 88704000 Fax: 603 88891233 E-mail: [email protected] http://agrolink.moa.my/dof/ Copyright©2006 Department of Fisheries Malaysia All Rights Reserved: No part of this publication may be reproduced, stored in a retrieval system or transmitted in any form or by any means, electronic, mechanical photocopying, recording or otherwise, without prior permission of the copyright owner. This publication should be cited as follows: Department of Fisheries Malaysia, 2006. Malaysia National Plan of Action for the Conservation and Management of Shark, Ministry of Agriculture and Agro-based Industry Malaysia, Putrajaya. 66 pp II SUMMARY Malaysia NPOA-Shark was developed according to the guidelines as set out in the FAO International Plan of Action for the Conservation and Management of Sharks (IPOA- Sharks). The main objective of Malaysia NPOA-Shark is to ensure the conservation and management of shark and their long-term sustainable use. For the purpose of this document, the term ‘shark’ refers to all chondrichthyan or cartilaginous fishes, comprising sharks, skates, rays and chimaeras. This management plan will provide a national guideline for managers and interested stakeholders on how to incorporate the conservation and management issues of sharks and rays into the overall management of fisheries resources.
    [Show full text]
  • New Records of Sharks (Elasmobranchii) from the Andaman and Nicobar Archipelago in India with Notes on Current Checklists
    Biodiversity Data Journal 6: e28593 doi: 10.3897/BDJ.6.e28593 Research Article New records of sharks (Elasmobranchii) from the Andaman and Nicobar Archipelago in India with notes on current checklists Zoya Tyabji‡,§, Rima W. Jabado|, Dipani Sutaria ¶ ‡ Andaman Nicobar Environment Team, Port Blair, India § Centre for Wildlife Studies, Bengaluru, India | Gulf Elasmo Project, Dubai, United Arab Emirates ¶ James Cook University, Queensland, Australia Corresponding author: Zoya Tyabji ([email protected]) Academic editor: Yasen Mutafchiev Received: 24 Jul 2018 | Accepted: 04 Sep 2018 | Published: 10 Sep 2018 Citation: Tyabji Z, Jabado R, Sutaria D (2018) New records of sharks (Elasmobranchii) from the Andaman and Nicobar Archipelago in India with notes on current checklists. https://doi.org/10.3897/BDJ.6.e28593 ZooBank: urn:lsid:zoobank.org:pub:7CBBD76C-9F49-4080-833E-36781527EE2B Abstract The diversity of sharks occurring off the Andaman and Nicobar Archipelago in India has received increased attention in recent years. Yet, available checklists are out of date, often with inaccurate information and a number of commercially important species have not been documented through research and fish landing surveys. Here we report on shark species examined during fish landing surveys conducted from January 2017 to April 2018. Records of twelve previously unreported species from the archipelago are presented and include the bignose shark (Carcharhinus altimus), pigeye shark (Carcharhinus amboinensis), bull shark (Carcharhinus leucas), snaggletooth shark (Hemipristis elongata), slender weasel shark (Paragaleus randalli), Arabian smoothhound shark (Mustelus mosis), Indonesian houndshark (Hemitriakis indroyonoi), sand tiger shark (Carcharias taurus), Indonesian bambooshark (Chiloscyllium hasseltii), tawny nurse shark (Nebrius ferrugineus), dwarf gulper shark (Centrophorus atromarginatus), and the Indonesian shortsnout spurdog ( Squalus hemipinnis).
    [Show full text]
  • Guidance on National Plan of Action for SHARKS in INDIA
    CMFRICMFRI Marine Marine Fisheries Fisheries Policy Policy Series Series No. No. 2 2 ISSN ISSN No: No: 2394-8019 2394-8019 Guidance on NationalGuidance Plan of onAction for National Plan of Action for SHARKS IN INDIA Guidance on National Plan of Action for SHARKS INDIA IN Shoba Joe Kizhakudan, P.U. Zacharia, Sujitha Thomas Shoba Joe Kizhakudan, E. Vivekanandan P.U. Zacharia, and Muktha Sujitha Menon Thomas, E. Vivekanandan and Muktha Menon Central Marine Fisheries Research Institute Post Box No. 1603, Ernakulam North P.O.,Kochi-682 018. Phone: +91 484 2394357, 2394867 Fax: +91 484 2394909 Indian Council of Agricultural Research E-mail : [email protected] www.cmfri.org.in CentralIndian Marine Council Fisheries of Agricultural Research Research Institute Post BoxCentral No. 1603, Marine Ernakulam Fisheries North P.O., Research Kochi-682 018, Institute Kerala, India CMFRI Marine Fisheries Policy Series No. 2 ISSN No: 2394-8019 Guidance on National Plan of Action for SHARKS IN INDIA Shoba Joe Kizhakudan, P.U. Zacharia, Sujitha Thomas, E. Vivekanandan and Muktha Menon Indian Council of Agricultural Research Central Marine Fisheries Research Institute Post Box No. 1603, Ernakulam North P.O., Kochi-682 018, Kerala, India Guidance on National Plan of Action for Sharks in India CMFRI Marine Fisheries Policy Series No. 2 June 2015. Published by Dr. A. Gopalakrishnan Director, CMFRI Authors Shoba Joe Kizhakudan P.U. Zacharia Sujitha Thomas E. Vivekanandan Muktha Menon Design Graficreations, Kochi Printed at St Francis Press, Ernakulam Production & Co-ordination Library and Documentation Centre Central Marine Fisheries Research Institute Post Box No. 1603, Ernakulam North P.O.,Kochi-682 018.
    [Show full text]