Junit 5 User Guide

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

JUnit 5 User Guide Stefan Bechtold, Sam Brannen, Johannes Link, Matthias Merdes, Marc Philipp, Christian Stein Version 5.4.2 Table of Contents 1. Overview . 1 1.1. What is JUnit 5? . 1 1.2. Supported Java Versions . 1 1.3. Getting Help . 1 1.4. Getting Started. 1 1.4.1. Downloading JUnit Artifacts. 1 1.4.2. JUnit 5 Features . 2 1.4.3. Example Projects. 2 2. Writing Tests . 2 2.1. Annotations . 3 2.1.1. Meta-Annotations and Composed Annotations . 4 2.2. Test Classes and Methods . 6 2.3. Display Names . 7 2.3.1. Display Name Generators . 8 2.4. Assertions . 10 2.4.1. Kotlin Assertion Support. 13 2.4.2. Third-party Assertion Libraries . 14 2.5. Assumptions. 15 2.6. Disabling Tests. 16 2.7. Conditional Test Execution. 17 2.7.1. Operating System Conditions. 18 2.7.2. Java Runtime Environment Conditions. 19 2.7.3. System Property Conditions . 20 2.7.4. Environment Variable Conditions . 20 2.7.5. Script-based Conditions. 21 Script Bindings. 22 2.8. Tagging and Filtering. 23 2.8.1. Syntax Rules for Tags . 23 2.9. Test Execution Order . 24 2.10. Test Instance Lifecycle . 25 2.10.1. Changing the Default Test Instance Lifecycle . 26 2.11. Nested Tests . 26 2.12. Dependency Injection for Constructors and Methods. 28 2.13. Test Interfaces and Default Methods . 31 2.14. Repeated Tests. 36 2.14.1. Repeated Test Examples . 36 2.15. Parameterized Tests . 39 2.15.1. Required Setup . 40 2.15.2. Consuming Arguments . 40 2.15.3. Sources of Arguments . 40 @ValueSource . 40 Null and Empty Sources . 41 @EnumSource . 42 @MethodSource . 43 @CsvSource . 45 @CsvFileSource . 46 @ArgumentsSource . 46 2.15.4. Argument Conversion . 47 Widening Conversion . 47 Implicit Conversion . 47 Explicit Conversion. 50 2.15.5. Argument Aggregation . 51 Custom Aggregators . 51 2.15.6. Customizing Display Names. ..

132

Copy Link

Recommended publications

Marketing Cloud Published: August 12, 2021
Marketing Cloud Published: August 12, 2021 The following are notices required by licensors related to distributed components (mobile applications, desktop applications, or other offline components) applicable to the services branded as ExactTarget or Salesforce Marketing Cloud, but excluding those services currently branded as “Radian6,” “Buddy Media,” “Social.com,” “Social Studio,”“iGoDigital,” “Predictive Intelligence,” “Predictive Email,” “Predictive Web,” “Web & Mobile Analytics,” “Web Personalization,” or successor branding, (the “ET Services”), which are provided by salesforce.com, inc. or its affiliate ExactTarget, Inc. (“salesforce.com”): @formatjs/intl-pluralrules Copyright (c) 2019 FormatJS Permission is hereby granted, free of charge, to any person obtaining a copy of this software and associated documentation files (the "Software"), to deal in the Software without restriction, including without limitation the rights to use, copy, modify, merge, publish, distribute, sublicense, and/or sell copies of the Software, and to permit persons to whom the Software is furnished to do so, subject to the following conditions: The above copyright notice and this permission notice shall be included in all copies or substantial portions of the Software. THE SOFTWARE IS PROVIDED "AS IS", WITHOUT WARRANTY OF ANY KIND, EXPRESS OR IMPLIED, INCLUDING BUT NOT LIMITED TO THE WARRANTIES OF MERCHANTABILITY, FITNESS FOR A PARTICULAR PURPOSE AND NONINFRINGEMENT. IN NO EVENT SHALL THE AUTHORS OR COPYRIGHT HOLDERS BE LIABLE FOR ANY CLAIM, DAMAGES OR OTHER
[Show full text]
Hamcrest.Pdf
Avenida de Castilla,1 - Edificio Best Point - Oficina 21B 28830 San Fernando de Henares (Madrid) tel./fax: +34 91 675 33 06 [email protected] - www.autentia.com ¿Qué ofrece Autentia Real Business Solutions S.L? Somos su empresa de Soporte a Desarrollo Informático. Ese apoyo que siempre quiso tener... 1. Desarrollo de componentes y proyectos a medida 2. Auditoría de código y recomendaciones de mejora 3. Arranque de proyectos basados en nuevas tecnologías 1. Definición de frameworks corporativos. 2. Transferencia de conocimiento de nuevas arquitecturas. 3. Soporte al arranque de proyectos. 4. Auditoría preventiva periódica de calidad. 5. Revisión previa a la certificación de proyectos. 6. Extensión de capacidad de equipos de calidad. 7. Identificación de problemas en producción. 3a RFP Concurso Verificación Gran Empresa previa Consultora 1 Producción Tecnología Consultora 2 Certificación Desarrollo o Pruebas Consultora 3 Sistemas 3b Piloto Equipo propio desarrollo autentia 4. Cursos de formación (impartidos por desarrolladores en activo) JPA-Hibernate, MyBatis Spring MVC, JSF-PrimeFaces /RichFaces, Control de autenticación y Motor de búsqueda empresarial (Solr) HTML5, CSS3, JavaScript-jQuery acceso (Spring Security) UDDI ETL (Talend) Web Services Rest Services Dirección de Proyectos Informáticos. Gestor portales (Liferay) Social SSO Metodologías ágiles Gestor de contenidos (Alfresco) SSO (Cas) Patrones de diseño Aplicaciones híbridas TDD Tareas programadas (Quartz) BPM (jBPM o Bonita) Gestor documental (Alfresco) Generación de informes (JasperReport) Inversión de control (Spring) ESB (Open ESB) Compartimos nuestro conociemiento en: Para más información visítenos en: www.adictosaltrabajo.com www.autentia.com E-mail: Contraseña: Deseo registrarme Entrar He olvidado mis datos de acceso Inicio Quiénes somos Tutoriales Formación Comparador de salarios Nuestro libro Charlas Más Estás en: Inicio Tutoriales Como hacer nuestros test más legibles con Hamcrest DESARROLLADO POR: Catálogo de servicios Francisco J.
[Show full text]
Silk Test 20.5
Silk Test 20.5 Silk4J User Guide Micro Focus The Lawn 22-30 Old Bath Road Newbury, Berkshire RG14 1QN UK http://www.microfocus.com © Copyright 1992-2019 Micro Focus or one of its affiliates. MICRO FOCUS, the Micro Focus logo and Silk Test are trademarks or registered trademarks of Micro Focus or one of its affiliates. All other marks are the property of their respective owners. 2019-10-23 ii Contents Welcome to Silk4J 20.5 ....................................................................................10 Licensing Information ......................................................................................11 Silk4J ................................................................................................................ 12 Do I Need Administrator Privileges to Run Silk4J? ........................................................... 12 Best Practices for Using Silk4J ........................................................................................ 12 Automation Under Special Conditions (Missing Peripherals) ............................................13 Silk Test Product Suite ...................................................................................................... 14 What's New in Silk4J ........................................................................................16 Save Time and Costs with Service Virtualization for Mobile Devices ............................... 16 Enhance Security with Java-based Encryption ................................................................. 16 Usability Enhancements
[Show full text]
Citrus Framework Offers a Wide Range of Test Actions to Take Control of the Process Flow During a Test (E.G
Citrus Authors: The Citrus Community Version 3.0.0, 2021-07-23 citrus 1. Preface . 2 2. Introduction. 3 2.1. Overview. 3 2.2. Usage scenarios . 3 3. Setup . 5 3.1. Using Maven. 5 3.2. Using Gradle. 8 4. Runtimes . 10 4.1. TestNG . 10 4.2. JUnit5 . 14 4.3. JUnit4 . 17 4.4. Cucumber . 19 4.5. Main CLI runtime . 30 5. Running tests in Java. 32 5.1. Test action runner . 32 5.2. Gherkin test action runner. 33 5.3. Test meta information. 33 5.4. Finally block. 34 5.5. Test behaviors . 36 5.6. Run custom code. 38 5.7. Resource injection . 39 6. Test variables . 44 6.1. Global variables . 44 6.2. Extract variables. 46 6.3. Path expressions . 48 6.4. Escape variables . 51 7. Message validation. 52 7.1. Validation registry . 52 7.2. Validation modules. 53 7.3. Json validation. 54 7.4. XML validation . 68 7.5. Schema validation . 98 7.6. Plain text validation. 103 7.7. Binary validation . 109 7.8. Hamcrest validation . 112 7.9. Custom validation . 113 8. Test actions . 117 8.1. Send . 117 8.2. Receive . 125 8.3. SQL. 137 8.4. Sleep . 146 8.5. Java . 146 8.6. Receive timeout. 148 8.7. Echo . 150 8.8. Stop time. 150 8.9. Create variables . 152 8.10. Trace variables . 154 8.11. Transform . ..
[Show full text]
Comparison Method Violates Its General Contract Javascript
Comparison Method Violates Its General Contract Javascript Micah remains perithecial after Carleigh gripes salably or phenolate any phonographer. Sickliest Bertram volatilised sostenuto. Defensive Claire dismounts innumerably while Lion always attenuates his shimmers motivated sleazily, he overselling so contradictively. IllegalArgumentException Comparison method violates its the contract at. Java error Comparison method violates its enterprise contract. Selected for the chrome browser view cart for dupont cross over paint code requires an paint cross reference only cast will have description. Latest AsposePDF Product Family topics Free Support. Can report this comparison method violates its general contract javascript enabled for cool and tsai liming for fields. Topics related to, follow the contract comparison method violates its general contract and then merges the place as well? Signal Start to late if started cases should be attached to weight Case. Brands and bump me however not gm color collections. For fields that sample of column data types, or as underneath any of paint! Scala than in Java. Comparison method violates its trash contract CMSDK. Previously, since the Channels would they exist. You can affect another year from what list data in music same configuration page. Check in many cases we cannot return not least mopar stuff for specific experience requirements for you. Be violating its general contract comparison method violates its bends anymore to generate random integers being, it depends on the violation of edges that! In stop, it makes working provided a special analysis graph class obsolete. This violates its general contract in the violation of. This method violating the general contract in handlers for generic algorithms and related to generate this web services, can provide additional cost a javascript.
[Show full text]
Open Source Licenses Applicable to Hitachi's Products Earlier Versions
Open Source Licenses Applicable to Hitachi’s Products EARLIER VERSIONS Several products are listed below together with certain open source licenses applicable to the particular product. The open source software licenses are included at the end of this document. If the open source package has been modified, an asterisk (*) appears next to the name of the package. Note that the source code for packages licensed under the GNU General Public License or similar type of license that requires the licensor to make the source code publicly available (“GPL Software”) may be available for download as indicated below. If the source code for GPL Software is not included in the software or available for download, please send requests for source code for GPL Software to the contact person listed for the applicable product. The materials below are provided “AS IS,” without warranty of any kind, including, but not limited to, the implied warranties of merchantability, fitness for a particular purpose, and non-infringement. Access to this material grants you no right or license, express or implied, statutorily or otherwise, under any patent, trade secret, copyright, or any other intellectual property right of Hitachi Vantara Corporation (“Hitachi”). Hitachi reserves the right to change any material in this document, and any information and products on which this material is based, at any time, without notice. Hitachi shall have no responsibility or liability to any person or entity with respect to any damages, losses, or costs arising from the materials
[Show full text]
Taming Functional Web Testing with Spock and Geb
Taming Functional Web Testing with Spock and Geb Peter Niederwieser, Gradleware Creator, Spock Contributor, Geb The Actors Spock, Geb, Page Objects Spock “Spock is a testing and specification framework for Java and Groovy applications. What makes it stand out from the crowd is its beautiful and highly expressive specification language. Thanks to its JUnit runner, Spock is compatible with most IDEs, build tools, and continuous integration servers. Spock is inspired from JUnit, RSpec, jMock, Mockito, Groovy, Scala, Vulcans, and other fascinating life forms. Spock (ctd.) http://spockframework.org ASL2 licence Serving mankind since 2008 Latest releases: 0.7, 1.0-SNAPSHOT Java + Groovy JUnit compatible Loves Geb Geb “Geb is a browser automation solution. It brings together the power of WebDriver, the elegance of jQuery content selection, the robustness of Page Object modelling and the expressiveness of the Groovy language. It can be used for scripting, scraping and general automation — or equally as a functional/web/acceptance testing solution via integration with testing frameworks such as Spock, JUnit & TestNG. Geb (ctd.) http://gebish.org ASL2 license Serving mankind since 2009 Latest releases: 0.7.2, 1.0-SNAPSHOT Java + Groovy Use with any test framework Loves Spock First-class page objects Page Objects “The Page Object pattern represents the screens of your web app as a series of objects. Within your web app's UI, there are areas that your tests interact with. A Page Object simply models these as objects within the test code. This reduces the amount of duplicated code and means that if the UI changes, the fix need only be applied in one place.
[Show full text]
Hamcrest Vs Assertj: an Empirical Assessment of Tester Productivity
Hamcrest vs AssertJ: an Empirical Assessment of Tester Productivity Maurizio Leotta, Maura Cerioli, Dario Olianas, Filippo Ricca Abstract: Context. Extensive unit testing is worth its costs in terms of the higher quality of the final product and reduced development expenses, though it may consume more than fifty percent of the overall project budget. Thus, even a tiny percentage of saving can significantly decrease the costs. Since recently competing assertion libraries emerged, we need empirical evidence to gauge them in terms of developer productivity, allowing SQA Managers and Testers to select the best. Objective. The aim of this work is comparing two assertion frameworks having a different approach (matchers vs. fluent assertions) w.r.t. tester productivity. Method. We conducted a controlled experiment involving 41 Bachelor students. AssertJ is compared with Hamcrest, in a test development scenario with the Java language. We analysed the number of correct assertions developed in a tight time frame and used this measure as a proxy for tester productivity. Results. The results show that adopting AssertJ improves the overall tester’s productivity significantly during the development of assertions. Conclusions. Testers and SQA managers selecting assertion frameworks for their organizations should consider as first choice AssertJ, since our study shows that it increases the productivity of testers during development more than Hamcrest. Digital Object Identifier (DOI): https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-29238-6_12 Copyright: © 2019 Springer Nature Switzerland The final authenticated version is available online at: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-29238-6_12 Hamcrest vs AssertJ: an Empirical Assessment of Tester Productivity [0000 0001 5267 0602] [0000 0002 8781 8782] Maurizio Leotta − − − , Maura Cerioli − − − , Dario [0000 0002 3928 5408] Olianas, Filippo Ricca − − − Dipartimento di Informatica, Bioingegneria, Robotica e Ingegneria dei Sistemi (DIBRIS) Università di Genova, Italy {name.surname}@unige.it Abstract.
[Show full text]
Pragmatic Unit Testingin Java 8 with Junit
www.it-ebooks.info www.it-ebooks.info Early praise for Pragmatic Unit Testing in Java 8 with JUnit Langr, Hunt, and Thomas demonstrate, with abundant detailed examples, how unit testing with JUnit works in the real world. Beyond just showing simple iso- lated examples, they address the hard issues–things like mock objects, databases, multithreading, and getting started with automated unit testing. Buy this book and keep it on your desk, as you’ll want to refer to it often. ➤ Mike Cohn Author of Succeeding with Agile, Agile Estimating and Planning, and User Stories Applied Working from a realistic application, Jeff gives us the reasons behind unit testing, the basics of using JUnit, and how to organize your tests. This is a super upgrade to an already good book. If you have the original, you’ll find valuable new ideas in this one. And if you don’t have the original, what’s holding you back? ➤ Ron Jeffries www.ronjeffries.com Rational, balanced, and devoid of any of the typical religious wars surrounding unit testing. Top-drawer stuff from Jeff Langr. ➤ Sam Rose This book is an excellent resource for those new to the unit testing game. Experi- enced developers should also at the very least get familiar with the very helpful acronyms. ➤ Colin Yates Principal Architect, QFI Consulting, LLP www.it-ebooks.info We've left this page blank to make the page numbers the same in the electronic and paper books. We tried just leaving it out, but then people wrote us to ask about the missing pages.
[Show full text]
Comparative Analysis of Junit and Testng Framework
International Research Journal of Engineering and Technology (IRJET) e-ISSN: 2395-0056 Volume: 05 Issue: 05 | May-2018 www.irjet.net p-ISSN: 2395-0072 Comparative Analysis of JUnit and TestNG framework Manasi Patil1, Mona Deshmukh2 Student, Dept. of MCA, VES Institute of Technology, Maharashtra, India1 Professor, Dept. of MCA, VES Institute of Technology, Maharashtra, India2 ---------------------------------------------------------------------***--------------------------------------------------------------------- Abstract - Testing is an important phase in SDLC, Testing It is flexible than Junit and supports parametrization, parallel can be manual or automated. Nowadays Automation testing is execution and data driven testing. widely used to find defects and to ensure the correctness and The Table – 1 compares different functionalities of TestNG completeness of the software. Open source framework can be and JUnit framework. used for automation testing such as Robotframework, Junit, Spock, NUnit, TestNG, Jasmin, Mocha etc. This paper compares Table -1: Functionality TestNG vs JUnit JUnit and TestNG based on their features and functionalities. Key Words: JUnit, TestNG, Automation Framework, Functionality TestNG JUnit Automation Testing, Selenium TestNG, Selenium JUnit Yes 1. INTRODUCTION Support Annotations Yes Yes Support Test Suit Initialization Yes Testing a software manually is tedious work, and takes lot of No time and efforts. Automation saves lot of time and money, Support for Tests groups Yes also it increases the test coverage
[Show full text]
Smart BDD Testing Using Cucumber and Jacoco
www.hcltech.com Smart BDD Testing Using Cucumber and JaCoCo Business assurance $ Testing AuthOr: Arish Arbab is a Software Engineer at HCL Singapore Pte Limited, having expertize on Agile GUI/API Automation methodologies. WHITEPAPER ApriL 2015 SMART BDD TESTING USING CUCUMBER AND JACOCO | APRIL 2015 TABLE OF CONTENTS INTRODUCTION 3 PROBLEM FACED 3 SOLUTION APPROACH 4 BENEFITS 6 IMPROVEMENTS 7 APPLICABILITY TO OTHER PROJECTS 7 UPCOMING FEATURES 7 REFERENCES 8 APPRECIATIONS RECEIVED 8 ABOUT HCL 9 © 2015, HCL TECHNOLOGIES. REPRODUCTION PROHIBITED. THIS DOCUMENT IS PROTECTED UNDER COPYRIGHT BY THE AUTHOR, ALL RIGHTS RESERVED. 2 SMART BDD TESTING USING CUCUMBER AND JACOCO | APRIL 2015 INTRODUCTION Behavioral Driven Development (BDD) testing uses natural language to describe the “desired behavior” of the system that can be understood by the developer, tester and the customer. It is a synthesis and refinement of practices stemming from TDD and ATDD. It describes behaviors in a single notation that is directly accessible to domain experts, testers and developers for improving communication. It focuses on implementing only those behaviors, which contribute most directly to the business outcomes for optimizing the scenarios. PROBLEM FACED By using the traditional automation approach, and if given a summary report of automated tests to the business analysts, then it is guaranteed that the report would be met with a blank expression. This makes it tricky to prove that the tests are correct— do they match the requirement and, if this changes, what tests need to change to reflect this? The whole idea behind BDD is to write tests in plain English, describing the behaviors of the thing that you are testing.
[Show full text]
Empirical Study of Test Case and Test Framework Presence in Public Projects on Github
applied sciences Article Empirical Study of Test Case and Test Framework Presence in Public Projects on GitHub Matej Madeja * , Jaroslav Porubän , Sergej Chodarev , Matúš Sulír and Filip Gurbál’ Department of Computers and Informatics, Technical University of Košice, Letná 9, 042 00 Košice, Slovakia; [email protected] (J.P.); [email protected] (S.C.); [email protected] (M.S.); fi[email protected] (F.G.) * Correspondence: [email protected] Abstract: Automated tests are often considered an indicator of project quality. In this paper, we performed a large analysis of 6.3 M public GitHub projects using Java as the primary programming language. We created an overview of tests occurrence in publicly available GitHub projects and the use of test frameworks in them. The results showed that 52% of the projects contain at least one test case. However, there is a large number of example tests that do not represent relevant production code testing. It was also found that there is only a poor correlation between the number of the word “test” in different parts of the project (e.g., file paths, file name, file content, etc.) and the number of test cases, creation date, date of the last commit, number of commits, or number of watchers. Testing framework analysis confirmed that JUnit is the most used testing framework with a 48% share. TestNG, considered the second most popular Java unit testing framework, occurred in only 3% of the projects. Keywords: testing culture; code quality; testing framework; GitHub; test case presence Citation: Madeja, M.; Porubän, J.; Chodarev, S.; Sulír, M.; Gurbál’, F.
[Show full text]