Rationalisation of the Protected Areas System Of
Total Page:16
File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb
RATIONALISATION OF THE PROTECTED AREAS SYSTEM OF HONDURAS VOLUME 1: MAIN STUDY Ir. Daan Vreugdenhil Dr. Paul R. House Carlos A. Cerrato, MSc. Lcdo. Ricardo A. Martínez Dra. Ana Cristina Pereira Financed by PROBAP/World Bank/UNDP/GEF Prepared by WICE Honduras, Tegucigalpa, 2002 RATIONALISATION OF THE PROTECTED AREAS SYS- TEM OF HONDURAS TABLE OF CONTENTS 1. NATURE CONSERVATION IN HONDURAS 5 1.1. INTRODUCTION 5 1.2. BIODIVERSITY IN HONDURAS 6 1.3. THE CURRENT STATE OF CONSERVATION 6 1.3.1. The National System of Protected Areas of Honduras (SINAPH) 6 1.3.2. Institutional Framework 7 1.4. OBJECTIVES OF THE STUDY 10 2. METHOD 11 2.1. COST-EFFECTIVENESS 11 2.2. COMPARATIVE WEIGHTING 11 2.2.1. Computer aided weighting 11 2.2.2. Evaluation parameters 11 2.2.3. Protected areas system requirements 13 2.2.4. Model development 18 2.2.5. Cost estimates 18 2.3. THE PLANNING TEAM 18 2.4. INFORMATION SOURCES 19 3. RATIONALISATION 19 3.1. DEVELOPMENT MODELS 19 3.1.1. Model 1: Full SINAPH 19 3.1.2. Model 2: “Minimum Conservation System” 20 3.1.3. Model 3: The “National Parks System” 20 3.2. PRESENCE/GAP/VIABILITY ANALYSIS 20 3.2.1. Outside of legally or proposed protected area 21 3.2.2. Outside of legally but inside proposed protected areas 23 3.2.3. Underrepresented in legally protected areas 24 3.2.4. Represented in Legally Protected Areas 29 3.3. FLORA AND FAUNA IN SINAPH 29 3.4. EX SITU CONSERVATION 30 3.5. PERSONNEL, MATERIAL REQUIREMENTS AND COSTS 31 4. REVISION OF CATEGORIES 34 5. INSTITUTIONAL CONSIDERATIONS 37 5.1. THE “NATIONAL PARKS SYSTEM” OF HONDURAS 37 5.1.1. The “National Parks System” within SINAPH 37 5.1.2. The "National Parks Service" of Honduras 38 5.1.3. Normation and supervision 38 5.2. PRIVATE SECTOR INVOLVEMENT 41 6. ENVIRONMENTAL SERVICES 41 6.1. TOURISM 41 6.1.1. Tourism in Central America 41 6.1.2. Income from Tourism 41 6.1.3. Principal markets 43 6.1.4. Tourism in Honduras 44 6.1.5. Development strategy of the tourism sector 44 6.1.6. The importance of protected areas for the economy 44 The Prioritised Protected Areas of Honduras, an evaluation by the World Institute for Conservation and Environment, WICE 2 6.2. OTHER SERVICES 45 6.2.1. Donations 45 6.2.2. Water 46 6.2.3. Carbon sequestration 46 6.2.4. Research facilitating services 46 6.2.5. Bioprospecting 46 The Prioritised Protected Areas of Honduras, an evaluation by the World Institute for Conservation and Environment, WICE 3 Abbreviations and Acronyms AFE/COHDEFOR Administración Forestal del Estado/ lands) Corporación Hondureña de Desarrollo IUCN International Union for the Conserva- Forestal tion of Nature AMUPROLAGO Asociación de Municipios del Lago de JBL Jardín Botanico Lancetilla Yojoa KfW Kreditanstalt für Wiederaufbau (Fi- AMITIGRA Fundación Amigos de la Tigra nancing Institution for Development BICA Bay Islands Conservation Association cooperation, Germany) BM Banco Mundial MBC Mesoamerican Biological Corridor CBMAP Corredor Biológico Mesoamericano del MD Moderately drained Atlántico Panameño (GEF/World MICOSYS Minimum Conservation System (WICE Bank) computer planning programme) CCAD Comisión Centroamericana de Ambi- MOPAWI Organización Moskitia Pawisa ente y Desarrollo NASA National Aeronautics and Space Ad- CITES Convention on International Trade in ministration (USA) Endangered Species of Wild Fauna and NGO Non-governmental Organisation Flora OAS Organisation of American States CLACDS Centro Latinoamericano para la Com- ODA Overseas Development Agency (Great petitividad y Desarrollo Sostenible Britain) CODDEFFAGOLF Comité para la Defensa y Desarrollo de PAAR Proyecto de Administración de Áreas la Flora y Fauna del Golfo de Fonseca Rurales (Honduras/World Bank) CONABIOH Comisión Nacional de Biodiversidad de PEMS Strategic Plan for the efficient and sus- Honduras tainable management of the National DIBIO Dirección General de Biodiversidad Protected Areas System DIGEPESCA Dirección General de Pesca y Acua- POA Plan Operativo Anual cultura PROARCA Programa Ambiental Regional para EAP Escuela Agrícola Panamericana Centroamérica (USAID) ENBRA Estrategia Nacional de Biodiversidad y PROBAP Proyecto de Biodiversidad en Áreas Plan de Acción Prioritarias (Honduras/World Bank) ESNACIFOR Escuela Nacional de Ciencias Foresta- PROLANSATE Fundación para la Protección de Lan- les cetilla, Punta Sal y Texíguat FAO Food and Agricultural Organisation SAG Secretaría de Agricultura y Ganadería (United Nations) SAM Sistema Arrecifal Mesoamericano FEHRPF Fundación Ecologista Héctor Rodrigo SERNA Secretaría de Recursos Naturales y Pastor Fasquelle Ambiente (Honduras) FIHT Federación Indígena Tawahka De Hon- SICA Sistema de Integración Centroameri- duras cana FUCAGUA Fundación Capiro, Calentura y Guai- SINAPH Sistema Nacional de Areas Protegidas moreto de Honduras FUCSA Fundación Cuero y Salado TNC The Nature Conservancy FUPNAPIB Fundación Parque Nacional Pico Bonito TRIGOH Trinacional Alliance on the Golf of GEF Global Environmental Facility Honduras GEO Grupo Ecológico de Olancho UNAH Universidad Nacional Autónoma de GEPROTUR Gerencia de Proyectos Turísticos (of Honduras SICA) UNDP United Nations Development Pro- GIS Geographic Information System gramme GTZ Gesellschaft für Entwicklungs Zusam- UNESCO United Nations Educational, Scientific, menarbeit (Germany) and Cultural Organisation IDA International Development Association USAID United States Agency for International IDB Inter-American Development Bank Development IHT Instituto Hondureño de Turismo USGS United States Geological Survey INADES Instituto Nacional De Desarrollo Soste- WB World Bank nible WCMC World Conservation Monitoring Center INCAE Instituto Centroamericano de Adminis- WICE World Institute for Conservation and tración de Empresas Environment ITC International Training Centre (Nether- WWF World Wide Fund For Nature The Prioritised Protected Areas of Honduras, an evaluation by the World Institute for Conservation and Environment, WICE 4 1. NATURE CONSERVATION IN Honduras’s population has grown from about 4.9 mil- HONDURAS lion inhabitants in 1991 to about 5.8 in 1998 and the projections are 9 million in another 18 years, as the 1.1.INTRODUCTION population growth rate is still close to 3 percent. As Of all the environmental problems affecting the Earth, rural population growth is usually higher than growth the loss of species is among the most dramatic because in urban areas, rural communities in Honduras will it is irreversible. World wide, every day species are continue feeling the need to convert natural habitat into disappearing from the face of the earth. Biodiversity productive lands to support their livelihoods, and land loss is largely caused by habitat destruction the result pressure on protected areas is likely to continue for at of the ever-growing need of society to occupy more least several more decades. Furthermore, the vast ma- land to feed and shelter a continuously growing popu- jority of the people of Honduras are poor. As a result, lation. Honduras too is suffering seriously from the the Government receives little revenue in taxes and conversion of forest into lands on which some form of therefore it is also poor. The needs for Government production predominates. According to the FAO, actions are enormous in the health sector, education, (1996) deforestation particularly seemed to have accel- infrastructure, drinking water, etc. etc. On this long list erated during the period 1980 – 1990. The Honduran of needs of the people of Honduras, conservation is Ecosystems Map, AFE/COHDEFOR1, 2002, which 2 just one more topic and financial contribution from the also covers waterbodies, shows that about 49 percent Government will always be restricted. This implies of the country is now still covered with more or less 3 that the conservation sector must be rational in staking natural habitats. The authors of the current document out its needs. The national conservation programme of have reasons to believe that deforestation has slowed Honduras needs to be highly cost effective in its ap- down considerably over the last decade, particularly in proach. This study helps the Government of Honduras the protected areas. This slow-down is the result of the in becoming more efficient in the execution of the recognition in the country that the possession of large most important part of its pursuit for conserving its wild spaces of natural land is important for both the natural heritage, its in situ conservation programme. well-being of the nation as well as for its economy. The study has been organised to facilitate different levels of detail, depending of his/her interest: Particularly on a political level, there has been in- • VOLUME I, MAIN STUDY: Overall overview creased interest. The last two administrations have of the presentation of the study with all the con- shown an increasing interest in conservation and the clusions and an overall literature list for the entire new administration under President Maduros has given study. The results of the selection alternatives in off clear signals that it considers conservation an im- the WICE analysis programme MICOSYS, are portant issue. Honduras has become aware that its presented in 3 separate table in MSEXCEL). nature is paramount for its growing tourism industry, • VOLUME II, BIODIVERSITY OF HONDU- which now has risen to occupy the second position of RAS: A biological overview of the scientific foreign trade earner, with 475 thousand travellers en- background and data of the study. This document tering the country and an income of 256 million dollars