DOCSLIB.ORG

Appendix a - Relevant Legislation

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text

Load more

WHP and Subsea Fields AC/L7 & AC/L8 Drilling Program 2020 Environment Plan TM-50-PLN-I-00001 Rev 2 APPENDIX A - RELEVANT LEGISLATION APPENDIX A: RELEVANT LEGISLATION APPENDIX A: RELEVANT LEGISLATION Convention on Biological Diversity (1992) The objectives of the convention are the conservation of biological diversity, the sustainable use of its components and the fair and equitable sharing of the benefits arising out of the utilisation of genetic resources. United Nations Framework Convention on Climate Change (1992) The objective of the convention is to stabilise greenhouse gas concentrations in the atmosphere at a level that would prevent dangerous interference with the climate system. Australia ratified the convention in December 1992 and it came into force on 21 December 1993. International Convention on Oil Pollution Preparedness, Response and Co-operation (1990) This convention sets up a system of oil pollution contingency plans and cooperation in fighting oil spills. Vienna Convention on the Protection of the Ozone Layer (1985) and the Montreal Protocol; on Substances that Deplete the Ozone Layer (1987) The Convention (ratified by Australia in 1987) and the Protocol (ratified in 1989) concern the phasing out of ozone depleting substances. United Nations Convention on the Law of the Sea (UNCLOS) (1982) Part XII of the convention sets up a general legal framework for marine environment protection. The convention imposes obligations on State Parties to prevent, reduce and control marine pollution from the various major pollution sources, including pollution from land, from the atmosphere, from vessels and from dumping (Articles 207 to 212). Subsequent articles provide a regime for the enforcement of national marine pollution laws in the many different situations that can arise. Australia signed the agreement relating to the implementation of Part XI of the Convention in 1982, and UNCLOS in 1994. Bilateral Agreements on the Protection of Migratory Birds Australia has negotiated bilateral agreements with Japan (Japan-Australia Migratory Birds Agreement [JAMBA], 1974), China (China-Australia Migratory Birds Agreement [CAMBA], 1986) and the Republic of Korea (Republic of Korea – Australia Migratory Birds Agreement [ROKAMBA], 2007) to protect species of migratory birds with international ranges. In November 2006, the East Asian-Australasian Flyway Partnership (Flyway Partnership) was launched in order to recognise and conserve migratory waterbirds in the East Asian – Australasian Flyway for the benefit of people and biodiversity. Convention on the Conservation of Migratory Species of Wild Animals (CMS or Bonn Convention) (1979) This Convention was concluded in 1979 and came into force on 1 November 1983. The Convention arose from a recommendation of the United Nations Conference on the Human Environment (Stockholm, 1972), and aims to conserve terrestrial, marine and avian species over the whole of their migratory range. It commits “Range States” to take action to conserve migratory species, especially those under threat. It is an umbrella agreement under which subsidiary regional agreements are established. International Convention for the Protection of Pollution from Ships (1973) and Protocol (1978) APPENDIX A: RELEVANT LEGISLATION This Convention and Protocol (together known as MARPOL) build on earlier conventions in the same area. MARPOL is concerned with operational discharges of pollutants from ships. It contains five Annexes, dealing respectively with oil, noxious liquid substances, harmful packaged substances, sewage and garbage. Detailed rules are laid out as to the extent to which (if at all) such substances can be released in different sea areas. The legislation giving effect to MARPOL in Australia is the Protection of the Sea (Prevention of Pollution from Ships) Act 1983, the Navigation Act 2012 and several Parts of Marine Orders made under this legislation. Australian and New Zealand guidelines for fresh and marine water quality (ANZECC/ARMCANZ 2000) These guidelines provide a framework for water resource management and state specific water quality guidelines for environmental values, and the context within which they should be applied. International Convention for the Prevention of Pollution from Ships, 1973/1978 (MARPOL 73/78) This convention is designed to reduce pollution of the seas, including dumping, oil and exhaust pollution. MARPOL 73/78 currently includes six technical annexes. Special areas with strict controls on operational discharges are included in most annexes. International Convention on the Control of Harmful Anti-fouling Systems This convention prohibits the use of harmful organotins in anti-fouling paints used on ships, and establishes a mechanism to prevent the potential future use of other harmful substances in anti- fouling systems. International Convention for the Safety of Life at Sea (SOLAS) 1974 In the event of an offshore emergency event that endangers the life of personnel, the International Convention for the Safety of Life at Sea (SOLAS) 1974 may take precedence over environmental management. Bonn Agreement for Cooperation in Dealing with Pollution of the North Sea by Oil and other harmful substances (Bonn Agreement) The Bonn Agreement is the mechanism by which the North Sea states, and the European Union (the Contracting Parties), work together to help each other in combating pollution in the North Sea area from maritime disasters and chronic pollution from ships and offshore installations; and to carry out surveillance as an aid to detecting and combating pollution at sea. The Bonn Agreement Oil Appearance Code (BAOAC) may be used during spill response activities. London (Dumping) Convention (1972) Dumping at sea is regulated by the convention on the Prevention of Marine Pollution by Dumping of Wastes and other Matter 1972 (the 'London Convention'). Article 4 provides a general prohibition on dumping of wastes except as specified in the Convention. The convention has annexed to it two lists of substances, the 'black list' of substances which may not be dumped at all, and the 'grey list' of substances which may only be dumped under a specific permit. International Convention Relating to Intervention on the High Seas in Cases of Oil Pollution Casualties (1969) The convention gives States Parties powers to intervene on ships on the high seas when their coastlines are threatened by an oil spill from that ship. International Convention on Civil Liability for Oil Pollution Damage (1969) APPENDIX A: RELEVANT LEGISLATION The convention and the associated International Convention on the Establishment of an International Fund for Compensation for Oil Pollution Damage 1971 set up a system of compulsory insurance and strict liability up to a certain figure for damages suffered as a result of an oil spill accident. Offshore Petroleum and Greenhouse Gas Storage Act 2006 The OPGGSA 2006 (OPGGSA) entered into force in 2008, superseding and repealing the previous offshore petroleum legislation – the Offshore Petroleum Act 2006 (OPA) and the Petroleum (Submerged Lands) Act 1967 (PSLA). Facilities located entirely in Commonwealth offshore waters are controlled by the Commonwealth OPGGSA and its regulations, including but not limited to the Offshore Petroleum and Greenhouse Gas Storage (Environment) Regulations 2009 (OPGGS (E) Regulations). The Act, and its regulations, is currently administered by the Joint Authority, which consists of the Commonwealth Minister for Resources and Energy and the State Minister for Mines and Petroleum. The WA Minister for Mines and Petroleum acts as a Designated Authority and is advised by the DMP whilst the Commonwealth Minister for Energy and Resources is advised by the Commonwealth Department of Resources, Energy and Tourism (DRET). Offshore Petroleum and Greenhouse Gas Storage (Environment) Regulations 2009 (OPGGS (E) Regulations) Under the OPGGS (E) Regulations an EP is required for proposals under Commonwealth jurisdiction, comprising a description of the environmental effects and risks of the project, and proposed mitigation measures to reduce these risks. The EP must be submitted to, and accepted by the Designated Authority (DA). The DA for Commonwealth waters adjacent to Western Australian state waters and out to the Australian Exclusive Economic Zone (EEZ) at 200 nm is NOPSEMA, who administers the regulations. Environment Protection and Biodiversity Conservation Act 1999 This Act came into force in July 2000 replacing five existing Commonwealth Acts (Environmental Protection (Impact of Proposals) Act 1974, World Heritage Properties Conservation Act 1983, National Parks and Wildlife Conservation Act 1975, Whale Protection Act 1980; and Endangered Species Protection Act 1992). The Environment Protection and Biodiversity Conservation Act (EPBC) provides for the protection of the environment, especially those aspects of the environment that are matters of National Environmental Significance (NES); and promotes ecologically sustainable development through the conservation and ecologically sustainable use of natural resources. Under this legislation all activities that will, or have the potential to, affect matters of NES are prohibited except; when undertaken in accordance with approval by the Minister for Environment, or when approved through a Bilateral Agreement with a State or Territory, or when approved through a process accredited by the Minister. Matters of “National Environmental Significance” are: World Heritage Properties; National Heritage Places;
Recommended publications
  • Director of National Parks Annual Report 2012–13 © Director of National Parks 2013

    Director of National Parks Annual Report 2012–13 © Director of National Parks 2013

    Director of National Parks Parks of National Director Annual ReportAnnual 2012–13 Director of National Parks Annual Report 2012–13 Managing the Australian Government’s protected areas © Director of National Parks 2013 ISSN 1443-1238 This work is copyright. Apart from any use as permitted under the Copyright Act 1968, no part may be reproduced by any process, re-used or redistributed without prior written permission from the Director of National Parks. Any permitted reproduction must acknowledge the source of any such material reproduced and include a copy of the original copyright notice. Requests and enquiries concerning reproduction and copyright should be addressed to: The Director of National Parks, PO Box 787, Canberra ACT 2601. Director of National Parks Australian business number: 13 051 694 963 Credits Front cover Maps – Environmental Resources Information Network Acacia alata photographed at the Australian National Botanic Gardens Designer – Papercut – David Woltschenko Editor – Byron Smith for Embellish Creative Sunrise at Booderee National Park, looking out to Bowen Island Indexer – Barry Howarth Little kingfisher, Kakadu National Park – Louise Denton Printed by – Union Offset Co. Pty Ltd Red crab, Christmas Island National Park Kakadu ranger Samantha Deegan with baby northern quoll Background image: sea urchin – Margarita Goumas Map data sources Collaborative Australian Protected Area Database, (CAPAD 2010), Commonwealth Marine Reserves:© Commonwealth of Australia, Department of the Environment, 2013 State and Territory Borders, Australian Waters: © Commonwealth of Australia, Geoscience Australia Caveat: All data presumed to be correct as received from data providers. No responsibility is taken by the Commonwealth for errors or omissions. The Commonwealth does not accept responsibility in respect to any information given in relation to, or as a consequence of anything contained herein.
  • Flying-Fox Dispersal Feasibility Study Cassia Wildlife Corridor, Coolum Beach and Tepequar Drive Roost, Maroochydore

    Flying-Fox Dispersal Feasibility Study Cassia Wildlife Corridor, Coolum Beach and Tepequar Drive Roost, Maroochydore

    Sunshine Coast Council Flying-Fox Dispersal Feasibility Study Cassia Wildlife Corridor, Coolum Beach and Tepequar Drive Roost, Maroochydore. Environmental Operations May 2013 0 | Page Table of Contents Introduction ................................................................................................................................ 2 Purpose ............................................................................................................................................... 2 Flying-fox Mitigation Strategies .......................................................................................................... 2 State and Federal Permits ................................................................................................................... 4 Roost Management Plan .................................................................................................................... 4 Risk ...................................................................................................................................................... 5 Flying-fox Dispersal Success in Australia ............................................................................................. 6 References .......................................................................................................................................... 7 Cassia Wildlife Corridor ................................................................................................................ 8 Background ........................................................................................................................................
  • Cairns Regional Council Water and Waste Report for Mulgrave River Aquifer Feasibility Study Flora and Fauna Report

    Cairns Regional Council Water and Waste Report for Mulgrave River Aquifer Feasibility Study Flora and Fauna Report

    Cairns Regional Council Water and Waste Report for Mulgrave River Aquifer Feasibility Study Flora and Fauna Report November 2009 Contents 1. Introduction 1 1.1 Background 1 1.2 Scope 1 1.3 Project Study Area 2 2. Methodology 4 2.1 Background and Approach 4 2.2 Demarcation of the Aquifer Study Area 4 2.3 Field Investigation of Proposed Bore Hole Sites 5 2.4 Overview of Ecological Values Descriptions 5 2.5 PER Guidelines 5 2.6 Desktop and Database Assessments 7 3. Database Searches and Survey Results 11 3.1 Information Sources 11 3.2 Species of National Environmental Significance 11 3.3 Queensland Species of Conservation Significance 18 3.4 Pest Species 22 3.5 Vegetation Communities 24 3.6 Regional Ecosystem Types and Integrity 28 3.7 Aquatic Values 31 3.8 World Heritage Values 53 3.9 Results of Field Investigation of Proposed Bore Hole Sites 54 4. References 61 Table Index Table 1: Summary of NES Matters Protected under Part 3 of the EPBC Act 5 Table 2 Summary of World Heritage Values within/adjacent Aquifer Area of Influence 6 Table 3: Species of NES Identified as Occurring within the Study Area 11 Table 4: Summary of Regional Ecosystems and Groundwater Dependencies 26 42/15610/100421 Mulgrave River Aquifer Feasibility Study Flora and Fauna Report Table 5: Freshwater Fish Species in the Mulgrave River 36 Table 6: Estuarine Fish Species in the Mulgrave River 50 Table 7: Description of potential borehole field in Aloomba as of 20th August, 2009. 55 Figure Index Figure 1: Regional Ecosystem Conservation Status and Protected Species Observation 21 Figure 2: Vegetation Communities and Groundwater Dependencies 30 Figure 3: Locations of Study Sites 54 Appendices A Database Searches 42/15610/100421 Mulgrave River Aquifer Feasibility Study Flora and Fauna Report 1.
  • Christmas Island Biodiversity Monitoring Program: December 2003 to April 2007

    Christmas Island Biodiversity Monitoring Program: December 2003 to April 2007

    Christmas Island Biodiversity Monitoring Program: December 2003 to April 2007 Report to the Department of Finance and Deregulation, from the Director of National Parks September 2008 2 Christmas Island Biodiversity Monitoring Program Project Contributions Project coordination: D.J. James; Field survey: D.J. James, K. Retallick; Data management, GIS: D.J. James, K. Retallick; Analyses and reporting: D.J. James Citation This document can be cited as: Christmas Island Biodiversity Monitoring Program: December 2003 to April 2007. Report to the Department of Finance and Deregulation from the Director of National Parks © Director of National Parks 2008 Christmas Island Biodiversity Monitoring Program 3 Contents EXECUTIVE SUMMARY ........................................................................................................................7 1. INTRODUCTION.................................................................................................................................9 1.1 Checklist of flora and fauna of Christmas Island.....................................................................9 1.2 Christmas Island biodiversity inventory database.................................................................10 2. CHRISTMAS ISLAND PIPISTRELLE ........................................................................................11 2.1 Summary of the results .........................................................................................................11 2.2 Research and monitoring methods .......................................................................................12
  • Order GASTEROSTEIFORMES PEGASIDAE Eurypegasus Draconis

    Order GASTEROSTEIFORMES PEGASIDAE Eurypegasus Draconis

    click for previous page 2262 Bony Fishes Order GASTEROSTEIFORMES PEGASIDAE Seamoths (seadragons) by T.W. Pietsch and W.A. Palsson iagnostic characters: Small fishes (to 18 cm total length); body depressed, completely encased in Dfused dermal plates; tail encircled by 8 to 14 laterally articulating, or fused, bony rings. Nasal bones elongate, fused, forming a rostrum; mouth inferior. Gill opening restricted to a small hole on dorsolat- eral surface behind head. Spinous dorsal fin absent; soft dorsal and anal fins each with 5 rays, placed posteriorly on body. Caudal fin with 8 unbranched rays. Pectoral fins large, wing-like, inserted horizon- tally, composed of 9 to 19 unbranched, soft or spinous-soft rays; pectoral-fin rays interconnected by broad, transparent membranes. Pelvic fins thoracic, tentacle-like,withI spine and 2 or 3 unbranched soft rays. Colour: in life highly variable, apparently capable of rapid colour change to match substrata; head and body light to dark brown, olive-brown, reddish brown, or almost black, with dorsal and lateral surfaces usually darker than ventral surface; dorsal and lateral body surface often with fine, dark brown reticulations or mottled lines, sometimes with irregular white or yellow blotches; tail rings often encircled with dark brown bands; pectoral fins with broad white outer margin and small brown spots forming irregular, longitudinal bands; unpaired fins with small brown spots in irregular rows. dorsal view lateral view Habitat, biology, and fisheries: Benthic, found on sand, gravel, shell-rubble, or muddy bottoms. Collected incidentally by seine, trawl, dredge, or shrimp nets; postlarvae have been taken at surface lights at night.
  • Environmental Guidance for Planning and Development

    Environmental Guidance for Planning and Development

    Part A Environmental protection and land use planning in Western Australia Environmental Guidance for Part B Biophysical factors Planning and Development Part C Pollution management May 2008 Part D Social surroundings Guidance Statement No. 33 2007389-0508-50 Foreword The Environmental Protection Authority (EPA) is an independent statutory authority and is the key provider of independent environmental advice to Government. The EPA’s objectives are to protect the environment and to prevent, control and abate pollution and environmental harm. The EPA aims to achieve some of this through the development of environmental protection guidance statements for the environmental impact assessment (EIA) of proposals. This document is one in a series being issued by the EPA to assist proponents, consultants and the public generally to gain additional information about the EPA’s thinking in relation to aspects of the EIA process. The series provides the basis for EPA’s evaluation of, and advice on, proposals under S38 and S48A of the Environmental Protection Act 1986 (EP Act) subject to EIA. The guidance statements are one part of assisting proponents, decision-making authorities and others in achieving environmentally acceptable outcomes. Consistent with the notion of continuous environmental improvement and adaptive environmental management, the EPA expects proponents to take all reasonable and practicable measures to protect the environment and to view the requirements of this Guidance as representing the minimum standards necessary. The main purposes of this EPA guidance statement are: • to provide information and advice to assist participants in land use planning and development processes to protect, conserve and enhance the environment • to describe the processes the EPA may apply under the EP Act to land use planning and development in Western Australia, and in particular to describe the environmental impact assessment (EIA) process applied by the EPA to schemes.
  • Reef Fishes of the Bird's Head Peninsula, West

    Reef Fishes of the Bird's Head Peninsula, West

    Check List 5(3): 587–628, 2009. ISSN: 1809-127X LISTS OF SPECIES Reef fishes of the Bird’s Head Peninsula, West Papua, Indonesia Gerald R. Allen 1 Mark V. Erdmann 2 1 Department of Aquatic Zoology, Western Australian Museum. Locked Bag 49, Welshpool DC, Perth, Western Australia 6986. E-mail: [email protected] 2 Conservation International Indonesia Marine Program. Jl. Dr. Muwardi No. 17, Renon, Denpasar 80235 Indonesia. Abstract A checklist of shallow (to 60 m depth) reef fishes is provided for the Bird’s Head Peninsula region of West Papua, Indonesia. The area, which occupies the extreme western end of New Guinea, contains the world’s most diverse assemblage of coral reef fishes. The current checklist, which includes both historical records and recent survey results, includes 1,511 species in 451 genera and 111 families. Respective species totals for the three main coral reef areas – Raja Ampat Islands, Fakfak-Kaimana coast, and Cenderawasih Bay – are 1320, 995, and 877. In addition to its extraordinary species diversity, the region exhibits a remarkable level of endemism considering its relatively small area. A total of 26 species in 14 families are currently considered to be confined to the region. Introduction and finally a complex geologic past highlighted The region consisting of eastern Indonesia, East by shifting island arcs, oceanic plate collisions, Timor, Sabah, Philippines, Papua New Guinea, and widely fluctuating sea levels (Polhemus and the Solomon Islands is the global centre of 2007). reef fish diversity (Allen 2008). Approximately 2,460 species or 60 percent of the entire reef fish The Bird’s Head Peninsula and surrounding fauna of the Indo-West Pacific inhabits this waters has attracted the attention of naturalists and region, which is commonly referred to as the scientists ever since it was first visited by Coral Triangle (CT).
  • Ecological Connectivity of Kimberley Marine Communities WAMSI

    Ecological Connectivity of Kimberley Marine Communities WAMSI

    Ecological Connectivity of Kimberley Marine Communities Oliver Berry1,8, Jim Underwood2,8, Kathryn McMahon3,8, Mike Travers4,8, Zoe Richards5,6,8, Glenn Moore5,8, Udhi Hernawan3,8, Joseph DiBattista6,8, Richard Evans7,8, James Gilmour2,8 1CSIRO, Crawley, Western Australia 2Australian Institute of Marine Science, Townsville, Queensland 3Edith Cowan University, Joondalup, Western Australia 4Fisheries Division, Department for Primary Industries and Regional Development, Hillarys, Western Australia 5Western Australian Museum, Perth, Western Australia 6Curtin University, Bentley, Western Australia 7Department of Biodiversity, Conservation and Attractions, Kensington, Western Australia 8Western Australian Marine Science Institution, Perth, Western Australia WAMSI Kimberley Marine Research Program Final Report Project 1.1.3 August 2017 WAMSI Kimberley Marine Research Program Initiated with the support of the State Government as part of the Kimberley Science and Conservation Strategy, the Kimberley Marine Research Program is co-invested by the WAMSI partners to provide regional understanding and baseline knowledge about the Kimberley marine environment. The program has been created in response to the extraordinary, unspoilt wilderness value of the Kimberley and increasing pressure for development in this region. The purpose is to provide science based information to support decision making in relation to the Kimberley marine park network, other conservation activities and future development proposals. Ownership of Intellectual property rights Unless otherwise noted, copyright (and any other intellectual property rights, if any) in this publication is owned by the Western Australian Marine Science Institution, CSIRO, Australian Institute of Marine Science, Edith Cowan University, The University of Western Australia, Western Australia Department of Primary Industries and Regional Development, Western Australian Museum, Curtin University and the Western Australian Department of Biodiversity, Conservation and Attractions.
  • Surveys of the Sea Snakes and Sea Turtles on Reefs of the Sahul Shelf

    Surveys of the Sea Snakes and Sea Turtles on Reefs of the Sahul Shelf

    Surveys of the Sea Snakes and Sea Turtles on Reefs of the Sahul Shelf Monitoring Program for the Montara Well Release Timor Sea MONITORING STUDY S6 SEA SNAKES / TURTLES Dr Michael L Guinea School of Environment Faculty of Engineering, Health, Science and the Environment Charles Darwin University Darwin 0909 Northern Territory Draft Final Report 2012-2013 Acknowledgements: Two survey by teams of ten and eleven people respectively housed on one boat and operating out of three tenders for most of the daylight hours for 20 days and covering over 2500 km of ocean can only succeed with enthusiastic members, competent and obliging crew and good organisation. I am indebted to my team members whose names appear in the personnel list. I thank Drs Arne Rasmussen and Kate Sanders who gave their time and shared their knowledge and experiences. I thank the staff at Pearl Sea Coastal Cruises for their organisation and forethought. In particular I thank Alice Ralston who kept us on track and informed. The captains Ben and Jeff and Engineer Josh and the coxswains Riley, Cam, Blade and Brad; the Chef Stephen and hostesses Sunny and Ellen made the trips productive, safe and enjoyable. I thank the Department of Environment and Conservation WA for scientific permits to enter the reserves of Sandy Islet, Scott Reef and Browse Island. I am grateful to the staff at DSEWPaC, for facilitating and providing the permits to survey sea snakes and marine turtles at Ashmore Reef and Cartier Island. Activities were conducted under Animal Ethics Approval A11028 from Charles Darwin University. Olive Seasnake, Aipysurus laevis, on Seringapatam Reef.
  • West Australian Marine Parks

    West Australian Marine Parks

    Ashmore Reef West Australian Long Reef Marine Parks Argo-Rowley Terrace Rowley Shoals Montebellos Ningaloo 2 oceans 10 parks 12 locations Shark Bay 23 degrees of latitude 28 expeditions 150 pelagic taxa 2,850 midwater BRUVS 55,290 individual animals Perth Canyon Geographe Bay Recherche Archipelago Gracetown Bremer Canyon Ashmore Reef • Ashmore Reef Marine Park is a 583 km2 combination of both sanctuary (IUCN Ia) and recreational use (IUCN IV) zones located 630 kilometres north of Broome in the Australian External Territory of Ashmore and Cartier Islands. • These waters hold historical significance for traditional Indonesian fisherman, they retain access to resources in certain areas of the MPA. Our surveys • Two surveys were conducted in the dry seasons of 2017 and 2018. • 200 samples in waters up to 354 metres deep. • 809 individuals counted from 42 taxa representing 19 families. • Observations included a whale shark (Rhincodon typus) and an ocean sunfish (Mola mola). • The waters are dominated by predators and large prey. Key findings • The threatened silvertip shark (Carcharhinus albimarginatus) is more abundant here than any other location. • We saw a decrease in abundance on the second year of sampling, yet the average length of the animals observed almost doubled. predators large prey small prey Why Ashmore Reef matters • It is one of the 65 Australian Ramsar sites, which are locations of significant importance to seabirds, shorebirds, and other marine life they support. • This habitat seems to be an important site for vulnerable reef-associated species of shark such as the silvertip shark. • Ashmore Reef might act as a stopover on Whale shark (Rhincodon typus) the migration path of whale sharks.
  • Parks Australia Science News Edition 8 — July 2020

    Parks Australia Science News Edition 8 — July 2020

    Parks Australia science news Edition 8 — July 2020 Welcome to the 8th edition of the Parks Australia science news. In this edition we take a second trip to Ashmore Reef and share results from the first voyage. We also check in on Booderee’s eastern quolls, get an update on the Christmas Island blue-tailed skink translocation, and see how Kakadu has made use of the recent lockdown to undertake an opportune survey. Field highlights from Ashmore Reef In July last year, we took you to the heart of the Timor Sea, tracking the adventures of an intrepid team of scientists that spent two weeks surveying the islands of Ashmore Reef Marine Park. These tiny dots in the middle of the ocean are a magnet for seabirds, turtles and shorebirds, some of which travel many hundreds of miles to eat, rest and breed. Learn more about the vegetation, bird and invasive species surveys the team completed during the first half of the Ashmore Environmental Assessment Project by reading Ashmore Reef Marine Park: An Indian Ocean Oasis which was published in 4th edition of the Parks Australia Science Newsletter. If you’re short on time, you can just watch the short video below. Ashmore Reef Marine Park: an isolated sanctuary Ashmore Environmental Assessment Project The project set out to see how life is fairing at Ashmore Reef and what management steps will be needed to address threats to this ecosystem. In this article, we’ll share some field highlights from the second half of the project and overall project results. In mid-2019, a different team of scientists from institutes across Australia, including CSIRO and the University of Western Australia, gathered in Broome for the 30-hour trip to the marine park.
  • Trade in Seahorses and Other Syngnathids in Countries Outside Asia (1998-2001)

    Trade in Seahorses and Other Syngnathids in Countries Outside Asia (1998-2001)

    ISSN 1198-6727 Fisheries Centre Research Reports 2011 Volume 19 Number 1 Trade in seahorses and other syngnathids in countries outside Asia (1998-2001) Fisheries Centre, University of British Columbia, Canada Trade in seahorses and other syngnathids in countries outside Asia (1998-2001) 1 Edited by Amanda C.J. Vincent, Brian G. Giles, Christina A. Czembor and Sarah J. Foster Fisheries Centre Research Reports 19(1) 181 pages © published 2011 by The Fisheries Centre, University of British Columbia 2202 Main Mall Vancouver, B.C., Canada, V6T 1Z4 ISSN 1198-6727 1 Cite as: Vincent, A.C.J., Giles, B.G., Czembor, C.A., and Foster, S.J. (eds). 2011. Trade in seahorses and other syngnathids in countries outside Asia (1998-2001). Fisheries Centre Research Reports 19(1). Fisheries Centre, University of British Columbia [ISSN 1198-6727]. Fisheries Centre Research Reports 19(1) 2011 Trade in seahorses and other syngnathids in countries outside Asia (1998-2001) edited by Amanda C.J. Vincent, Brian G. Giles, Christina A. Czembor and Sarah J. Foster CONTENTS DIRECTOR ’S FOREWORD ......................................................................................................................................... 1 EXECUTIVE SUMMARY ............................................................................................................................................. 2 Introduction ..................................................................................................................................................... 2 Methods ...........................................................................................................................................................