DOCSLIB.ORG

Drayton Bassett, Hints and Weeford HS2 London-West Midlands May 2013

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Drayton Bassett, Hints and Weeford HS2 London-West Midlands May 2013 PHASE ONE DRAFT ENVIRONMENTAL STATEMENT Community Forum Area Report 21 | Drayton Bassett, Hints and Weeford HS2 London-West Midlands May 2013 ENGINE FOR GROWTH DRAFT ENVIRONMENTAL STATEMENT Community Forum Area Report ENGINE FOR GROWTH 21 I Drayton Bassett, Hints and Weeford High Speed Two (HS2) Limited, 2nd Floor, Eland House, Bressenden Place, London SW1E 5DU Telephone 020 7944 4908 General email enquiries: [email protected] Website: www.hs2.org.uk © Crown copyright, 2013, except where otherwise stated. Copyright in the typographical arrangement rests with the Crown. You may re-use this information (not including logos or third-party material) free of charge in any format or medium, under the terms of the Open Government Licence. To view this licence, visit www.nationalarchives.gov.uk/doc/open-government-licence/ or write to the Information Policy Team, The National Archives, Kew, London TW9 4DU, or e-mail: [email protected]. Where we have identified any third-party copyright information you will need to obtain permission from the copyright holders concerned. To order further copies contact: DfT Publications Tel: 0300 123 1102 Web: www.dft.gov.uk/orderingpublications Product code: ES/27 Printed in Great Britain on paper containing at least 75% recycled fibre. CFA Report – Drayton Bassett, Hints and Weeford/No 21 I Contents Contents Draft Volume 2: Community Forum Area Report – Drayton Bassett, Hints and Weeford/No 21 5 Part A: Introduction 6 1 Introduction 7 1.1 Introduction to HS2 7 1.2 Purpose of this report 7 1.3 Structure of this report 9 Part B: Drayton Bassett, Hints and Weeford – overview of the area and description of the Proposed Scheme 10 2 Drayton Bassett, Hints and Weeford 11 2.1 Overview of the area 11 2.2 Description of the Proposed Scheme 14 2.3 Construction of the Proposed Scheme 17 2.4 Operation of the Proposed Scheme 26 2.5 Community forum engagement 27 2.6 Route section main alternatives 28 2.7 Proposals for further consideration 28 Part C: Environmental topic assessments 30 3 Agriculture, forestry and soils 31 3.1 Introduction 31 3.2 Policy framework 31 3.3 Assessment scope and key assumptions 31 3.4 Environmental baseline 31 3.5 Construction 34 3.6 Operation 37 1 CFA Report – Drayton Bassett, Hints and Weeford/No 21 I Contents 4 Air quality 38 4.1 Introduction 38 4.2 Policy framework 38 4.3 Assessment scope and key assumptions 38 4.4 Environmental baseline 38 4.5 Construction 40 4.6 Operation 41 5 Community 42 5.1 Introduction 42 5.2 Policy framework 42 5.3 Assessment scope and key assumptions 42 5.4 Environmental baseline 42 5.5 Construction 44 5.6 Operation 47 6 Cultural heritage 48 6.1 Introduction 48 6.2 Policy framework 48 6.3 Assessment scope and key assumptions 48 6.4 Environmental baseline 49 6.5 Construction 50 6.6 Operation 52 7 Ecology 54 7.1 Introduction 54 7.2 Policy framework 54 7.3 Assessment scope and key assumptions 54 7.4 Environmental baseline 55 7.5 Construction 58 7.6 Operation 61 8 Land quality 63 8.1 Introduction 63 8.2 Policy framework 63 8.3 Assessment scope and key assumptions 63 8.4 Environmental baseline 64 8.5 Construction 66 8.6 Operation 67 2 CFA Report – Drayton Bassett, Hints and Weeford/No 21 I Contents 9 Landscape and visual assessment 69 9.1 Introduction 69 9.2 Policy framework 69 9.3 Assessment scope and key assumptions 70 9.4 Environmental baseline 70 9.5 Construction 71 9.6 Operation 80 10 Socio-economics 87 10.1 Introduction 87 10.2 Policy framework 87 10.3 Assessment scope and key assumptions 87 10.4 Environmental baseline 87 10.5 Construction 88 10.6 Operation 89 11 Sound, noise and vibration 90 11.1 Introduction 90 11.2 Policy framework 90 11.3 Assessment scope and key assumptions 90 11.4 Environmental baseline 90 11.5 Construction 90 11.6 Operation 91 12 Traffic and transport 93 12.1 Introduction 93 12.2 Policy framework 93 12.3 Assessment scope and key assumptions 93 12.4 Environmental baseline 94 12.5 Construction 96 12.6 Operation 99 13 Water resources and flood risk assessment 100 13.1 Introduction 100 13.2 Policy framework 100 13.3 Assessment scope and key assumptions 100 13.4 Environmental baseline 101 13.5 Construction 103 13.6 Operation 104 14 References 106 2 3 CFA Report – Drayton Bassett, Hints and Weeford/No 21 I Contents List of figures Figure 1: HS2 Phase One route and community forum areas 8 Figure 2: Area context map 12 Figure 3: Indicative construction programme for the area 26 Figure 4: Business Sector Composition in Lichfield District and West Midlands 88 List of tables Table 1: Location of construction site compounds 19 Table 2: Demolition works 21 Table 3: Watercourse diversions 21 Table 4: Highway and road diversions 22 Table 5: Footpath, cycleway and bridleway diversions 23 Table 6: Viaducts, underbridges and overbridges 24 Table 7: Holdings affected by the Proposed Scheme 33 Table 8: Preliminary evaluation of likely value of protected and/or notable species occurring within this section of the route 57 Table 9: Significant residual construction effects on ecological receptors within this section of the route 60 Table 10: Significant residual operational effects on ecological receptors within this section of the route 62 Table 11: Significant landscape effects during construction 72 Table 12: Significant visual effects during construction 73 Table 13: Significant landscape effects during operation year 1 (2026) 81 Table 14: Significant visual effects during operation year 1 (2026) 82 Table 15: Satellite compound by size, number, workforce number, average duration of use and daily trips 97 4 CFA Report – Drayton Bassett, Hints and Weeford/No 21 I Contents Draft Volume 2: Community Forum Area Report Drayton Bassett, Hints and Weeford/No 21 Structure of the HS2 draft Environmental Statement The draft ES documentation for the purpose of this consultation comprises: • A non-technical summary (NTS) – providing a summary of the Proposed Scheme, the likely significant effects of the Proposed Scheme, both beneficial and adverse, and the means to avoid or reduce the adverse effects; and • A main report – consisting of two volumes: ȃ Volume 1: Introduction to the Environmental Statement and Proposed Scheme which provides an introduction to HS2, an overview of the hybrid bill process and the environmental impact assessment (EIA) methodology, an introduction to consultation and engagement, the main strategic and route-wide alternatives considered; and ȃ Volume 2: Includes 26 Community Forum Area (CFA) reports, each with a separate corresponding set of drawings, which together provide the assessment of local environmental effects. An assessment of the effects of the Proposed Scheme on a route-wide basis is presented in Report 27. HS2 Ltd set up 26 community forums along the line of route of the Proposed Scheme, as a regular way of engaging with local communities1. Volume 2 of this draft ES supports this engagement strategy by providing a draft ES report for each CFA. This is a report for the Drayton Bassett, Hints and Weeford area, CFA 21. The draft ES has been written in a clear and accessible manner; however, on occasion it has been necessary to use technical terms. Given this, a glossary of terms and list of abbreviations for all draft ES documentation is provided. 1 Details of these community forums are provided on the HS2 Ltd website at http://www.hs2.org.uk/have-your-say/forums/community-forums. Accessed 26 April 2013 5 CFA Report – Drayton Bassett, Hints and Weeford/No 21 I Contents Part A: Introduction 6 CFA Report – Drayton Bassett, Hints and Weeford/No 21 I Introduction 1 Introduction 1.1 Introduction to HS2 1.1.1 HS2 is planned to be a Y-shaped rail network with stations in London, Birmingham, Leeds, Manchester, South Yorkshire and the East Midlands, linked by high speed trains running at speeds of up to 360 kilometres per hour (kph) (225 miles per hour (mph)). 1.1.2 HS2 is proposed to be built in two phases. Phase One (the Proposed Scheme), the subject of this draft ES, would involve the construction of a new railway line of approximately 230km (143 miles) between London and Birmingham that would become operational by 2026; with a connection to the West Coast Main Line (WCML) near Lichfield and to the existing HS1 line in London. The Phase One route and the 26 CFAs are shown in Figure 1. 1.1.3 On opening, Phase One would run up to 14 trains per hour (tph). HS2 trains would be up to 400 metres (m) long with 1,100 seats during peak hours. Beyond the dedicated high speed track, these high speed trains would connect with and run on the existing WCML to serve passengers beyond the HS2 network. A connection to HS1 would also allow some services to run to mainland Europe via the Channel Tunnel. 1.1.4 Phase Two would involve the construction of lines from Birmingham to Leeds and Manchester; with construction commencing around 2027, and planned to be operational by 2033. After Phase Two opens, it is expected that the frequency of train services on some parts of the Phase One route could increase up to 18tph. 1.1.5 The Government believes that the HS2 network should link to Heathrow and its preferred option is for this to be built as part of Phase Two. However, the Government has since taken the decision to pause work on the Heathrow link until after 2015 when it expects the Airports Commission to publish its final report on recommended options for maintaining the country’s status as an international aviation hub.
Load more

Recommended publications
  • Rural Settlement Sustainability Study 2008
    Rural Settlement Sustainability Study 2008 June 2008 Rural Settlement Sustainability Study 2008 Contents 1 Aims of the Study 3 2 Background to Rural Sustainability 5 3 Definition of Rural Settlements 9 4 Definition of Rural Services 11 5 Delivery of Rural Services 13 6 Inter-Relationship Between Rural Settlements & Urban Areas 15 7 Primary Services, Facilities & Jobs 17 8 Key Local Services & Facilities 19 9 Rural Accessibility 25 10 Sustainable Rural Settlement Summary 29 Appendices 1 Rural Settlements: Population & Dwellings i 2 Rural Transport: Car Ownership by Settlement iii 3 Sustainability Matrix: Access, Services & Facilities v June 2008 1 Aims of the Study 1.1 This report has been prepared to assist in the development of policies for sustainable development within Lichfield District. Information provided within the document will inform the preparation of a Core Strategy for the District as part of the Local Development Framework, in particular in the consideration of potential development locations within the District and an overall spatial strategy for longer term development having regard to principles of sustainability. 1.2 In his report on the Public Examination into the District Council’s first submitted Core Strategy (withdrawn 2006), the Inspector concluded that although there were proposed housing allocations within some of the District’s rural settlements, there was a lack of evidence in relation to the suitability of villages in the District to accommodate growth. He considered that the relative sustainability of different settlements should have been assessed as part of the preparation of the Core Strategy. He indicated that an assessment of the sustainability of rural settlements would ensure that the scale and location of development outside the District’s two main towns was driven by overall sustainability considerations, rather than simply the availability of previously developed land.
    [Show full text]
  • Proposed Drayton Bassett Conservation Area Draft Appraisal February 2018
    Drayton Bassett Conservation Area Appraisal and Management Plan Draft February 2018 Drayton Bassett Conservation Area ADOPTION STATEMENT SECTION 1 – CONSERVATION AREA APPRAISAL 1.1 Introduction 1.2 Planning Policy Context 1.3 Summary of Significance 1.4 Location and Setting 1.5 Historic Development 1.6 Architectural Quality and Built Form 1.7 Open Space, Parks and Gardens and Trees 1.8 Assessment of Condition 1.9 Protection Offered by Designation 1.10 Maps SECTION 2 – CONSERVATION AREA MANAGEMENT PLAN 2.1 Introduction 2.2 Planning Policies and Guidance 2.3 Regeneration and Enhancement 2.4 Street and Traffic Management 2.5 Trees, Open Space and Green Infrastructure Strategies 2.6 Enforcement and Remediation Strategy SECTION 3 – REFERENCE, APPENDICES AND CONTACT DETAILS Appendix A – Article 4 Directions Appendix B – The Local List References Contact Details 2 ADOPTION STATEMENT Cabinet approval for consultation – 5th December 2017 Public Consultation – 5th March to 15th April 2018 Public Meeting – 20th March 2018 at a meeting of the Parish Council Final document approved Publication complete Final designation date 3 SECTION 1 – CONSERVATION AREA APPRAISAL 1.1 Introduction Subject to public consultation and further approval by the Council the Drayton Bassett Conservation Area is proposed to be designated in 2018 and covers an area of 2.3 hectares. The boundary will follow the route established in the current Conservation Area document. This is a logical route which encompasses the historic core of the settlement, and includes all existing buildings which were recorded on the 1882 first edition Ordnance Survey mapping, and excludes later development. The purpose of this document is to provide an understanding of the special architectural and historical character of the area which will form the basis for development control decisions and for developing proposals and initiatives for the area in the future.
    [Show full text]
  • Drayton Bassett Conservation Area Appraisal and Management Plan
    Drayton Bassett Conservation Area Appraisal and Management Plan December 2018 Drayton Bassett Conservation Area ADOPTION STATEMENT SECTION 1 – CONSERVATION AREA APPRAISAL 1.1 Introduction 1.2 Planning Policy Context 1.3 Summary of Significance 1.4 Location and Setting 1.5 Historic Development 1.6 Architectural Quality and Built Form 1.7 Open Space, Parks and Gardens and Trees 1.8 Assessment of Condition 1.9 Protection Offered by Designation 1.10 Maps SECTION 2 – CONSERVATION AREA MANAGEMENT PLAN 2.1 Introduction 2.2 Planning Policies and Guidance 2.3 Regeneration and Enhancement 2.4 Street and Traffic Management 2.5 Trees, Open Space and Green Infrastructure Strategies 2.6 Enforcement and Remediation Strategy SECTION 3 – REFERENCE, APPENDICES AND CONTACT DETAILS Appendix A – Article 4 Directions Appendix B – The Local List References Contact Details 2 ADOPTION STATEMENT Cabinet approval for consultation – 5th December 2017 Public Consultation – 5th March to 4th June 2018 Public Meeting – 20th March 2018 at a meeting of the Parish Council O&S Meeting – 12th November 2018 Cabinet Meeting – 4th December 2018 Council approval and final designation date – 18th December 2018 Statutory notices published – February 2019 3 SECTION 1 – CONSERVATION AREA APPRAISAL 1.1 Introduction The Drayton Bassett Conservation Area was designated in 2018 and covers an area of 3.1 hectares. The boundary follows the route shown in section 1.10. This is considered to be a logical route which encompasses the historic core of the settlement, and includes all existing buildings which were recorded on the 1882 first edition Ordnance Survey mapping, and also the early C20th School and which excludes most of the later development.
    [Show full text]
  • River Basin Management Plan Humber River Basin District Annex C
    River Basin Management Plan Humber River Basin District Annex C: Actions to deliver objectives Contents C.1 Introduction 2 C. 2 Actions we can all take 8 C.3 All sectors 10 C.4 Agriculture and rural land management 16 C.5 Angling and conservation 39 C.6 Central government 50 C.7 Environment Agency 60 C.8 Industry, manufacturing and other business 83 C.9 Local and regional government 83 C.10 Mining and quarrying 98 C.11 Navigation 103 C.12 Urban and transport 110 C.13 Water industry 116 C.1 Introduction This annex sets out tables of the actions (the programmes of measures) that are proposed for each sector. Actions are the on the ground activities that will implemented to manage the pressures on the water environment and achieve the objectives of this plan. Further information relating to these actions and how they have been developed is given in: • Annex B Objectives for waters in the Humber River Basin District This gives information on the current status and environmental objectives that have been set and when it is planned to achieve these • Annex D Protected area objectives (including programmes for Natura 2000) This gives details of the location of protected areas, the monitoring networks for these, the environmental objectives and additional information on programmes of work for Natura 2000 sites. • Annex E Actions appraisal This gives information about how we have set the water body objectives for this plan and how we have selected the actions • Annex F Mechanisms for action This sets out the mechanisms - that is, the policy, legal, financial and voluntary arrangements - that allow actions to be put in place The actions are set out in tables for each sector.
    [Show full text]
  • High Speed Two Phase 2A: West Midlands to Crewe Working Draft Environmental Impact Assessment Report Volume 2: Community Area Report CA1: Fradley to Colton
    HS2 Phase 2a: West Midlands to Crewe HS2 Phase 2a: West Midlands to Crewe High Speed Two Phase 2a: West Midlands to Crewe Working Draft Environmental Impact Assessment Report Working Draft EIA Report | Volume 2: Community Area report | CA1: Fradley to Colton Working Draft EIA Report | Volume 2: Community Area report | CA1: Fradley to Colton Volume 2: Community Area report CA1: Fradley to Colton September2016 September2016 High Speed Two (HS2) Limited One Canada Square Canary Wharf September 2016 London E14 5AB www.gov.uk/hs2 CS590_C6 High Speed Two Phase 2a: West Midlands to Crewe Working Draft Environmental Impact Assessment Report Volume 2: Community Area report CA1: Fradley to Colton September 2016 High Speed Two (HS2) Limited has been tasked by the Department for Transport (DfT) with managing the delivery of a new national high speed rail network. It is a non-departmental public body wholly owned by the DfT. High Speed Two (HS2) Limited, One Canada Square, Canary Wharf, London E14 5AB Telephone: 020 7944 4908 General email enquiries: [email protected] Website: www.gov.uk/hs2 A report prepared for High Speed Two (HS2) Limited: High Speed Two (HS2) Limited has actively considered the needs of blind and partially sighted people in accessing this document. The text will be made available in full on the HS2 website. The text may be freely downloaded and translated by individuals or organisations for conversion into other accessible formats. If you have other needs in this regard please contact High Speed Two (HS2) Limited. © High Speed Two (HS2) Limited, 2016, except where otherwise stated.
    [Show full text]
  • Appendix 2 HECA Overviews
    Appendix 2: Historic Environment Character Area Overview Reports This appendix provides an overview of the historic environment for each of the Historic Environment Character Areas (HECAs) which fall within Lichfield District. It should be noted that the information and any recommendations contained within each of the documents is subject to amendment should any new information become available. For further information regarding the Historic Environment Record (HER); Historic Landscape Characterisation (HLC) and designated sites please contact: Cultural Heritage Team Environment & Countryside Development Services Directorate Staffordshire County Council Riverway Stafford ST16 3TJ Tel: 01785 277281/277285/277290 Email: [email protected] Staffordshire County Council February 2009 1 Historic Environment Character Area (HECA) 2a Introduction This document forms an overview of the HECA which specifically addresses the potential impact of medium to large scale development upon the historic environment. The character area covers 5,645ha lies wholly within Lichfield District boundary and to the west of Tamworth. Archaeological and Historic Documentation Archaeological work within the character area has tended to concentrate along the A5 and the M6 (Toll) roads. The information on this character area mostly comes from the HER data, whilst VCH has covered part of the area. Historic Environment Assets Summary The current understanding on the later prehistoric landscape of the character area suggests that it had mostly been heavily wooded until Bronze Age, when some clearance may have begun to take place to support a small scale pastoral economy. The earliest evidence for human activity from the character area dates to the Mesolithic period; however, this comes from flint artefacts and probably represents the presence of mobile hunting groups and transitory occupation.
    [Show full text]
  • HS2 Community and Environment Fund
    HS2 Community and Environment Fund What is the Community and Environment Fund (CEF)? The CEF fund has been created to add benefit over and above committed mitigation and statutory compensation to communities along the route that are demonstrably disrupted by the construction of Phase One of HS2 from London to West Midlands. In Lichfield District this will include: Drayton Bassett Hints Weeford Swinfen and Packington Whittington Lichfield City Fradley and Streethay Kings Bromley Armitage and Handsacre There are two types of CEF funding: CEF Local will focus on quality of life and environment in individual communities. CEF Strategic will focus on large projects across several communities and address strategic rather than purely local concerns. Wherever possible, the CEF fund aims to leave a sustainable legacy. A combined total of £40 million has been made available for these two funds over a period of 11 years throughout the Phase One construction period and for the first year of operation of HS2 services. CEF Local will fund smaller projects (up to a maximum of £75,000 per project) which will benefit quality of life for individual communities. CEF Strategic will fund larger grants (from £75,001 up to a maximum of £1 million per project) and will provide a legacy by supporting projects which benefit multiple communities along the Phase One route. Who can apply for funding? Primarily this funding programme is targeted at the voluntary/community sector, including resident’s associations, constituted community groups, Community Interest Companies (CICs), social enterprises, community businesses and registered charities. Other organisations may be eligible to apply for funding too eg if they have been formally established for public benefit and are not for profit.
    [Show full text]
  • Weeford Quarry: Hydrogeological Assessment
    Weeford Quarry: Hydrogeological Assessment Prepared for Cemex UK Operation Ltd. Oldbury Warley West Midlands B694RJ Report reference: 60073R1, August 2008 Report status: Final Confidential Prepared by ESI Ltd New Zealand House,160 Abbey Foregate, Shrewsbury, SY2 6FD, UK Tel +44(0)1743 276100 Fax +44 (0)1743 248600 email [email protected] Registered office: New Zealand House, 160 Abbey Foregate, Shrewsbury, SY2 6FD. Registered in England and Wales, number 3212832 Weeford Quarry: Hydrogeological Assessment This report has been prepared by ESI Ltd in its professional capacity as soil and groundwater specialists, with reasonable skill, care and diligence within the agreed scope and terms of contract and taking account of the manpower and resources devoted to it by agreement with its client, and is provided by ESI solely for the internal use of its client. The advice and opinions in this report should be read and relied on only in the context of the report as a whole, taking account of the terms of reference agreed with the client. The findings are based on the information made available to ESI at the date of the report (and will have been assumed to be correct) and on current UK standards, codes, technology and practices as at that time. They do not purport to include any manner of legal advice or opinion. New information or changes in conditions and regulatory requirements may occur in future, which will change the conclusions presented here. This report is provided to the client. Should the client wish to release this report to any other third party for that party’s reliance, ESI accepts no responsibility of any nature to any third party to whom this report or any part thereof is made known.
    [Show full text]
  • A Landscape Survey of the Parish of Shenstone
    A Landscape Survey of the Parish of Shenstone Edited by Richard Totty for The Staffordshire Archaeological and Historical Society Lichfield 2009 A Landscape Survey of the Parish of Shenstone Edited by Richard Totty for The Staffordshire Archaological and Historical Society President John Hunt, B.A. , Ph.D., FSA, F.R.Hist.Soc, P.G.C.E. Contributions by members of the Society including Brian Bull, Dr Dianne Barre , Betty Fox , Dr John Hunt, Alan Moore , Bronwen Ross , Dr Richard Totty , Diana Wilkes , Roland Watson and others. Lichfield 2009 www.sahs.uk.net 1 St John's Church Shenstone in a 1784 water colour ( from a print in the William Salt Library ) This publication, and the project upon which it is based, would not have been possible without the support of the Heritage Lottery Fund who first grant-aided the Society's project in 2005 through the Local Heritage Initiative scheme. Staffordshire Archaeological and Historical Society gratefully acknowledge the support of the HLF for this project from its inception through to the production of this Report. We would also like to acknowledge the interest and enthusiasm of the many Shenstone residents who have supported and shared in the research of the project, opening their homes to members of the buildings group, sharing their own knowledge of the village and parish, and participating in the various community-based events that the Society has promoted during the course of the project. Particular thanks are owed to Shenstone Library, and to the committee of the Wesley Hall. 2 THEMES 1. Introduction 2. Topography 3.
    [Show full text]
  • Staffordshire. Tamworth
    DIRECTORY.] STAFFORDSHIRE. TAMWORTH. :353 a.m. & 5·45 p.m. On sunday there is one delivery only \ Treasurer, Richard Pearson, National Prov. Bank, Markets~ by letter carriers, commencing at 7 a. m. & on that day Medical Officer of Health, llerbert John Fausset M.n., M.ch. callers' letters are delivered at the counter from 8 to 10 a..m Colehill :Money orders are issued & paid, savings bank, annuity & Borough Surveyor & Sanitary Inspector, Henry John Clar- insurnnce business transacted & inland revenue licences son, 22 Church street issued from 8 a. m. to 8 p.m. ; & on saturdays from 8 a. m. Collector of District Rates, James IIastilow, 84 Bole bridge st to 8 p.m.; deposits received until 8 p.m. Money order, Inspector of Common Lodging llouses, Police Inspector savings bank, annuity & insurance business is not trnns- John Dodd acted, nor one licences issued on sundays, Christmas Manager of Assembly Rooms, Frederick Hughes day or Good Friday. Postal Telegraph Office open from 8 Sergeant-at-Mace, Thomas Top lis!, 19 George street a. m. tillS p.m. on weekdays & from 8 till1oa.m. on sun Town Crier, Charles Hatton, 10 College lane & & & TowN SuB-PosT M. 0. 0. S. B. Annuitv• & Insurance Office,4 Orchard street.-Thomas Taylor,sub-postmaster. Public Establishments . Letters dispatched 10. Io a. m. I 1 5 & 9 p.m Assembly Rooms, Corpora.1non st.Frederick Hughes, managr WAtL LETTER BOXES. Cemetery, Wigginwn road, Corporation act as burial board; Lichfield street, cleared 10.30 a. m. I, 5, 7 & 9 p.m.; ann­ John Matthews, town clerk ; Henry Selvester, keeper days, 9 p.m Cottage Hospital & Provident Dispensary, The Leys, Miss Peel Arms, Market street, Io.
    [Show full text]
  • TAME, ANKER and MEASE CATCHMENT ACTION MANAGEMENT PLAN March 2017
    TAME, ANKER AND MEASE CATCHMENT ACTION MANAGEMENT PLAN March 2017 Severn Trent Birmingham & Black Country Wildlife Trust Trent Rivers Trust Warwickshire Wildlife Trust Contents Foreward ................................................................................................................................................. 3 A Message from Severn Trent .............................................................................................................. 4 Introduction ............................................................................................................................................ 5 Catchment Vision .................................................................................................................................... 7 Catchment Objectives .......................................................................................................................... 7 Catchment Challenges ......................................................................................................................... 7 Data and Evidence ................................................................................................................................... 8 Catchment Characterisation ................................................................................................................ 8 Birmingham and the Black Country .................................................................................................. 8 North and West Warwickshire ........................................................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • Tamworth Borough Council Green Belt Review 2014
    Tamworth Borough Council Green Belt Review 2014 1-27 Contents Section Page 1 Scope of Green Belt Review 3 2 Introduction and Aims of the Review 3 3 Defining the West Midlands Green Belt in Tamworth 4 4 Methodology of the Review 7 5 Purpose of West Midlands Green Belt and National Policy 9 Context 6 Stage 1 11 7 Stage 2 14 8 Stage 3 20 9 Summary and Recommendations 27 2-27 1. Scope of the Green Belt Review Tamworth includes part of the West Midlands Green Belt towards the south and south east of the Borough. The principal purpose of this review is to assess the extent to which it meets the five purposes of Green Belt as stated in paragraph 80 of the National Planning Policy Framework (NPPF). Evidence is needed to support the policies and proposals to be contained in the Local Plan 2006 - 2031. This is in order to show that the presence of statutory Green Belt within Tamworth has been properly taken into account in the preparation of the Plan and that the Green Belt boundaries have been critically assessed to ensure that they are appropriate to fulfil their purpose during the Plan period and beyond. This Green Belt review supersedes the 2012 review prepared by Lichfield District Council. 2. Introduction and aims of the Review The aims of this review are: • To review the land within the Green Belt against the five purposes of the Green Belt as outlined in paragraph 80 of the National Planning Policy Framework. • To make an assessment of opportunities to enhance the beneficial use of the Green Belt as outlined in paragraph 81 of the National Planning Policy Framework.
    [Show full text]