DOCSLIB.ORG

What's Standard?

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
What's Standard? play bridge What’s Standard? Using Grant Standard: Responding to 1NT — by David Lindop ߜ Previous articles in this series, the Transfers and Slam ♠ A J A hand like this is a ♥ K Q 9 8 5 Grant Basic and Grant Standard With a five-card or longer major, it little more awkward. ♦ A Q 10 7 Summary Charts, and corresponding seems automatic to start with a We aren’t sure if we convention cards, can be found at ♣ 7 3 transfer when partner opens 1NT. belong in slam and www.audreygrant.com. However, if we also have 16 or more we also don’t know whether we or responding to 1NT, the points and are interested in reaching belong in hearts, diamonds, or Summary Chart gives an slam, we must look ahead. A simple notrump. Fortunately, we can do a Foverview of our methods: raise after a transfer is only inviting little exploration because a new suit game and a jump to game is a signoff. is forcing after a Jacoby transfer. RESPONSES How do we show slam interest? We can begin the auction like this: ♣ 2 : Stayman ♠ KJ 3 Here we have 16 OPENER RESPONDER ♦ 2 : 5+ hearts (transfer) ♥ K J 9 7 4 high-card points plus 1NT 2♦ ♥ 2 : 5+ spades (transfer) ♦ A Q 1 length point for the 2♥ 3♦ 2♠: transfer to 3♣ ♣ Q 9 4 ♦ (to sign off in clubs or diamonds) five-card suit. That’s Our transfer bid of 2 shows five or enough to invite slam but not enough more hearts and our subsequent bid 3♣/3♦: 6+ suit; invit. to 3NT ♦ ♥ ♠ to commit the partnership to slam. of 3 is forcing, showing four or 3 /3 : Forcing; invit. to slam The way to do this is to start with a more diamonds. It doesn’t say we We previously looked at the basic transfer to hearts and then bid 4NT: forgot we were playing transfers! use of Stayman and Transfers. Now OPENER RESPONDER Hopefully, opener’s next bid will let’s look a little deeper. 1NT 2♦ help us decide what to do. If opener 2♥ 4NT ♥ Exercising Judgment bids 3 , for example, showing 4NT is not Blackwood. It’s similar to support for hearts, we can cuebid 3♠ Both Stayman and transfers are a quantitative—invitational—raise and begin looking for slam. If instead, tools that are available and responder from 1NT to 4NT except that we are partner bids 3NT, showing no interest must choose when to use them. showing a five-card heart suit along in either hearts or diamonds, we can ♠ Q 8 3 Partner opens 1NT the way. With a minimum, opener pass or make one more try with an ♥ 8 7 5 4 3 and we have to decide can pass or bid 5♥ with three-card invitational raise to 4NT. ♦ KJ what to do. With a or longer support. With a maximum, No one said transfers were going ♣ J 9 4 five-card major, we opener can accept the invitation by ♦ ♥ to make things any easier! They just can respond 2 to transfer opener to jumping to 6 or 6NT. give us some new options. 2♥ and pass, but is that the best ♠ A J 10 8 5 Here we have 18 ♠ A J 9 8 7 5 With a six-card or choice? We can’t be sure 2♥ will be ♥ K J 2 high-card points and ♥ 3 longer major and better than 1NT. Partner might have a ♦ Q 4 1 length point for ♦ A Q J enough strength doubleton heart. Even if partner has ♣ AK 5 the five-card suit. ♣ A 9 3 for a slam, we can three hearts, we might still take as That’s enough to bid slam. To show simply transfer to the major and bid many tricks in notrump as hearts the five-card major and let opener ♥ with all our high cards in side suits. choose between 6♠ and 6NT, we slam. Here we could bid 2 to transfer to 2♠ and then jump to 6♠. Also, we have 7 high-card points transfer to spades and jump to 5NT: But what if we want to invite slam plus 1 length point for the five-card OPENER RESPONDER with a six-card or longer suit, or suit, for a total of 8. With 8-9 points, 1NT 2♥ explore delicately for a grand slam? we usually invite game. Should we 2♠ 5NT ♠ 8 4 plan to transfer to hearts and then This isn’t the grand slam force. It If we start with a ♥ A K J 9 7 3 transfer of 2♦ and bid 2NT, inviting game? simply asks opener to pick a slam: ♦ ♠ QJ 3 opener bids 2♥, There’s no right answer. Some 6 with three-card or longer support; ♣ A 4 players would pass 1NT; some would otherwise 6NT. There’s no need to what next? A raise ♥ to 3♥ would be invitational; a raise to transfer to 2 and pass; some would ask for aces in this type of auction. ♥ ♦ transfer and bid 2NT. The point is We have enough combined strength 4 would be a signoff; a bid of 3 that our conventions don’t provide that we shouldn’t be missing two would show a second suit. We could ♥ answers, just methods to apply once aces. It’s more likely we could be jump to 5 as an invitation, but that we decide what we want to do. missing the ♥A-Q or ♦A-K! risks getting us too high. PB-4 May, 2004 play bridge Some partnerships have methods Grant Standard use the popular ♠ 8 3 With this hand, (such as Texas transfer bids) to help approach of extended transfers, ♥ 7 4 we would jump to get around this dilemma. In Grant which takes advantage of the fact ♦ A Q 10 6 5 3 3♦ in response to Standard, however, we can use the that a response of 2♠ is no longer ♣ 10 6 2 1NT. With a poor popular approach of treating an needed to show spades when the fit for diamonds, opener will pass and immediate jump to 3♥ or 3♠ by partnership uses Jacoby transfers: we’ll stop in partscore in diamonds. responder as a slam try, showing a • 2♠ asks opener to bid 3♣ If partner has a fit for diamonds— ♦ six-card or longer suit. Responder can then pass to leave the the missing K—and stoppers in With a poor fit for the major, partnership in a club partscore or bid the other suits, partner can bid 3NT opener bids 3NT. With a good fit, 3♦ to play partscore in diamonds. and try for nine tricks. opener can raise to game with a ♠ 8 6 2 With this hand, we Minor Suit Slams minimum or cuebid with a maximum. ♥ 5 respond 2♠ to 1NT. Investigating slam in a minor suit is A bid of 4NT by responder would ♦ Q 10 8 7 5 2 When opener duti- awkward. To make a forcing bid in now be the Blackwood convention. ♣ J 8 3 fully bids 3♣, we a minor suit, we have to start with From Opener’s Side bid 3♦ and opener is expected to pass. 2♣ and then bid the minor suit. After opening 1NT, most of opener’s This shows a weakness of extended ♠ 6 4 If partner opens rebids are automatic. Even later bids transfers: the strong hand is dummy ♥ J 6 1NT, a response of are usually limited to answering when responder has diamonds. ♦ A Q J 7 5 3 2♦ would be a questions posed by responder. However, methods to get around this ♣ AK 7 transfer; a response ♠ K J 7 4 With a balanced hand (such as four suit transfers) are of 2♠ followed by 3♦ over opener’s ♥ J 3 and 15 high-card outside our current scope. 3♣ would be a signoff; and a jump to ♦ AQ 5 points, we open 1NT. If ♠ 4 As usual, we have to 3♦ would be invitational. Instead, we ♣ K J 7 3 responder bids 2♣, we ♥ 7 5 2 exercise judgment as begin by responding 2♣. Opener is bid 2♠, showing the four-card major ♦ J 9 7 2 responder. If partner going to assume this is Stayman and ♦ ♥ ♠ suit. If responder then raises to 3♠, ♣ Q J 7 6 5 opens 1NT, we have a will bid 2 , 2 , or 2 . Now we bid ♦ we pass since responder is asking choice between passing and bidding 3 which (hopefully) alerts partner whether we have a minimum or a 2♠ to get opener to bid 3♣. Will we that we actually have a strong hand maximum, and we have a minimum. better off playing at the three level in with diamonds. If responder bids 2♦, we automati- clubs? Hard to tell. It’s probably best Opener can bid 3NT with a poor fit cally accept the transfer by bidding to pass and let partner try to scramble for diamonds and no interest in slam. 2♥. If responder then bids 2NT, we seven tricks in 1NT. With a fit for diamonds, opener can simply raise to 4♦ or make a cuebid pass because we have a minimum. If ♠ Don’t waste time Q 4 with a maximum and interest in responder bids 3NT—asking us to ♥ 7 5 transferring when ♥ reaching slam. Our slam bidding choose between 4 and 3NT—we ♦ A J 5 the partnership is pass with only a doubleton heart. ♣ methods can take over from there.
Load more

Recommended publications
  • Tt Fall 12 Web.Pub
    VOL. 53 No. 3 FALL 2012 Meet Michigan’s winning mini-Spingold squad Editor’s note: A team of five 20-something Ann Arbor players won the 0-1500 mini- Spingold KO, a multi- day limited national championship, at the summer North Ameri- can Bridge Champion- ships in Philadelphia. A month earlier, they also won the Sunday Winners of the mini-Spingold 0-1500 Swiss Teams at the KO Teams: (front) Jin Hu and Jonathan Fleischmann; (back) Max Glick, Zach- Toledo Regional. ary Scherr and Zachary Wasserman. Here are their stories: Jonathan Fleischmann ter. I'm an attorney less than a year out of law school. I'm 24 years old and live in I started playing in 1999 Bloomfield Hills with my fa- (Continued on page 22) ther, two brothers, and a sis- DON’T FORGET TO VOTE The annual election for MBA Board of Directors will be held during the last four days of the October regional. If you cannot be there on one of those days, you can still vote by complet- ing and sending in an absentee ballot. See page 5. Candi- dates’ pictures and statements appear on pages 6 and 7. Michigan Bridge Association Unit #137 2012 VINCE & JOAN REMEY MOTOR CITY REGIONAL October 8-14, 2012 Site: William Costick Center, 28600 Eleven Mile Road, Farmington Hills MI 48336 (between Inkster and Middlebelt roads) 248-473-1816 Intermediate/Newcomers Schedule (0-299 MP) Single-session Stratified Open Pairs: Tue. through Fri., 1 p.m. & 7 p.m.; Sat., 10 a.m. & 2:30 p.m.
    [Show full text]
  • System Notes
    System Notes James Sundstrom Nathan Savir April 9, 2009 Notation Legend M Either Major. If used multiple times, it always refers to the same major. For example, 1M-2| -2M means either the auction 1~ -2| - 2~ or 1♠ -2| -2♠ , no other auction. m Either minor. As per M. OM Other major. This is only used after 'M', such as 1m-1M-2NT-3OM. om Other minor. As per OM. R Raise. Used in some of the step based system to mean a simple raise, such as 1~ -2~ . DR Double Raise. Q Cuebid. Acknowledgements Special thanks are owed to Blair Seidler, without whose teaching I probably would not ever have written these notes. If I did write them, they surely would not be nearly as good as they are. These notes are a (mostly very-distant) relative of his Carnage notes, though a few sections have been borrowed directly from Carnage. 1 Contents I Non-Competitive Auctions4 1 Opening Bid Summary6 2 Minor Suit Auctions7 2.1 Minor-Major................................7 2.1.1 Suit Bypassing Agreements...................7 2.1.2 New Minor Forcing........................7 2.1.3 Reverses..............................8 2.2 Minor Oriented Auctions.........................8 2.3 NT Oriented auctions...........................8 2.4 Passed Hand Bidding...........................8 3 Major Suit Auctions9 3.1 1 over 1 Auctions.............................9 3.2 Major Suit Raise Structure........................9 3.2.1 Direct Raises...........................9 3.2.2 Bergen...............................9 3.2.3 Jacoby 2NT............................9 3.2.4 3NT................................ 10 3.2.5 Splinters.............................. 10 3.3 Passed Hand................................ 10 3.3.1 Drury..............................
    [Show full text]
  • The Perceptions of Policymakers on the Transfer Pathway in Texas Public
    THE PERCEPTIONS OF POLICYMAKERS ON THE TRANSFER PATHWAY IN TEXAS PUBLIC HIGHER EDUCATION Kimberly A. Faris Dissertation Prepared for the Degree of DOCTOR OF PHILOSOPHY UNIVERSITY OF NORTH TEXAS May 2016 APPROVED: Amy Fann, Major Professor Beverly Bower, Committee Member Marc Cutright, Committee Member Celia Williamson, Committee Member Daniel Chen, Program Coordinator for Higher Education Jan Holden, Chair of the Department of Counseling and Higher Education Jerry Thomas, Dean of the College of Education Costas Tsatsoulis, Interim Dean of the Toulouse Graduate School Faris, Kimberly. The Perceptions of Policymakers on the Transfer Pathway in Texas Public Higher Education. Doctor of Philosophy (Higher Education), May 2016, 272 pp., 1 table, references, 144 titles. Community college students transfer to public universities experiencing a pathway filled with complexity and inequity. Transfer students are not able to graduate at the same pace as native students at the university and complete their baccalaureate degrees 18% below the rate of native students. Policymakers have attempted to address the baccalaureate gap. This qualitative study explored the perspectives of Texas policymakers and policy influencers on the efficacy of policies intended to improve transfer outcomes. This study investigated what experience participants have with transfer policy, what their perceptions of the transfer pathway are, and how their voices can refine an understanding of policy development and ways to improve student persistence. Purposeful sampling was used to explore the perspectives of 14 Texas policymakers and those that influence policy. Findings revealed that significant gaps exist between expectations and student realities and that the completion agenda is driving policy decisions. Participants perceived that transfer students have been ignored in the completion metrics, which influence institutional priorities.
    [Show full text]
  • Bidding Notes
    Bidding Notes Paul F. Dubois February 19, 2015 CONTENTS 1 Preliminaries 6 1.1 How to Use This Book.....................................6 1.2 Casual Partners.........................................7 1.3 Acknowledgments.......................................7 1.4 Notation and Nomenclature...................................7 1.5 The Captain Concept......................................8 2 Hand Evaluation 9 2.1 Basic System..........................................9 2.1.1 Adjusting to the Auction................................ 10 2.1.2 Losing Trick Count................................... 10 2.2 Bergen Method......................................... 11 2.3 Examples............................................ 11 2.4 What Bid To Open....................................... 11 3 Reverses 13 3.1 Reverses by Opener....................................... 13 3.1.1 Responding To Opener’s Reverse........................... 13 3.2 Reverses By Responder..................................... 14 4 Opening Notrump 15 4.1 How To Choose A Response To 1N.............................. 15 4.1.1 Responding With No Major Suit Or Long Minor................... 16 4.1.2 Responding With A Major Suit Or Long Minor.................... 16 4.2 Stayman Convention...................................... 16 4.3 Major Transfers......................................... 17 4.3.1 When the transfer is doubled or overcalled...................... 18 4.3.2 Interference before transfers.............................. 19 4.4 When Responder Is 5-4 In The Majors............................
    [Show full text]
  • Bidding and Play Definitions
    Bidding and Play Definitions for BridgeClues2.Com BC Bidding_PlayDefs.doc Contents Page 1. INTRODUCTION 1 2. POINT COUNT 1 2.1 High Card Points (HCP) 1 2.2 Long Suit Distribution Points 1 2.3 Short Suit Distribution Points 1 2.4 Points 1 3. SUIT BIDS 2 3.1 Five Card Majors 2 3.2 Forcing 1NT over a Major by an Unpassed Hand 2 3.3 Convenient Minor Openings 2 3.4 Limit Raises 2 3.5 Preemptive Minor Suit Raises 2 3.6 Preemptive Jumps to Game in Partner’s Major Opening 2 3.7 Opening Four in a Major 2 3.8 Preemptive Three Bids 2 3.9 Weak Jump Overcalls 3 3.10 Weak Jump Responses 3 3.11 Weak Two Bids 3 3.12 Balancing in a Suit 3 3.13 Opening in Third Seat 3 3.14 Opening in Fourth Seat 4 4.0 NOTRUMP BIDS 4 4.1 Bid of 1NT – 15 to 17 HCP's 4 4.2 Bid of 2NT – 20 to 21 HCP's 4 4.3 Opening Bid of 2C with a Rebid of 2NT – 22 to 24 HCP's 4 4.4 Opening Bid of 2C with a Rebid of 3NT – 25 to 27 HCP's 4 4.5 3H or 3S Response to a 1NT Opening Bid 4 4.6 Balancing in Notrump 5 4.7 Stayman 5 4.8 Drop Dead Stayman (Garbage Stayman or Crawling Stayman) 5 4.9 Gerber 5 4.10 Super Gerber 5 4.11 Quantitative 4NT 6 4.12 Jacoby Transfers 6 4.13 Texas Transfers 6 BC Bidding_PlayDefs.doc ii 4.14 Relay in competition 6 4.15 ACOL 3NT 6 4.16 Gambling 3NT 6 5.
    [Show full text]
  • 25 Bridge Conventions You Should Know ISBN 978-1-55494-030-1 1
    MASTER POINT PRESS TORONTO © 1999 Barbara Seagram & Marc Smith All rights reserved. It is illegal to reproduce any portion of this material, except by special arrangement with the publisher. Reproduction of this material without authorization, by any duplication process whatsoever, is a violation of copyright. Master Point Press 331 Douglas Ave Toronto, Ontario Canada M5M 1H2 (416) 781-0351 Email: [email protected] Websites: www.masterpointpress.com www.masteringbridge.com www.bridgeblogging.com www.ebooksbridge.com Canadian Cataloguing in Publication Data Smith, Marc, 1960- 25 bridge conventions you should know ISBN 978-1-55494-030-1 1. Contract bridge — Bidding. I. Seagram, Barbara. II. Title. III. Title: 25 bridge conventions you should know. GV1282.4.S64 1999 795.41’52 C98-932699-3 Editor Ray Lee Cover and Interior design Olena S. Sullivan Printed and bound in Canada 15 14 13 12 11 13 12 11 10 09 To my wonderful husband, Alex Kornel — my partner in life, in business, and at the table — with all my love. Barbara To the most important people in my life: my wife Charlotte, my dog Georgio, and all the bridge partners who have patiently suffered my idiosyncracies over the years. Marc FOREWORD I have just read a good bridge book, a very good bridge book — the one you have in your hands. I don’t know whether everyone who writes a foreword reads the book as thoroughly as I have this one, but I did, and you have a treat in store for yourself. You are about to familiarize yourself with twenty-five of the most popular and useful bidding conventions described succinctly, simply, and clearly — very clearly.
    [Show full text]
  • SAYC Tabulated for BBO Ver 0.45 2008 Sep 24 Page 1 of 8
    SAYC Tabulated for BBO ver 0.45 2008 Sep 24 Page 1 of 8 Compiled by Roger Pfister (RogerPfi on BBO) The latest version of this file is down loadable in MS Word (97/2000/XP) format from http://RogerPf.com Background I started to compile this document in August 2008. I was returning to bridge having not played for over 20 years. Back when I did play my world was full of four card majors and ACOL. My first introduction is to Internet Bridge left me completely thrown. I felt like a beginner again in the game I had once played well. I found it extremely hard to understand what was happening in the instant partnership five card major world that is Internet Bridge at least is bridge at BBO (Bridge Base Online). http://online.bridgebase.com The general style of system description appears to be just to say you play a SAYC and then list a bag full of conventions. Others claim to play two over one (2/1). Some just start by saying five card majors and yet again others give none of the above and just released a bag of conventions, if they say anything. I assume these people believe they are playing five card majors I think Italy by not saying they're playing five card majors are playing for card majors, but who knows, I don't I just hope they do. My response has been to go out and collect what information I could about SAYC and attempt to write from it a SAYC guide to bidding.
    [Show full text]
  • “Texas Transfers” Vs “Jacoby Transfers”
    “Texas Transfers” vs “Jacoby Transfers” A “ Texas Transfer ” is a transfer bid used by a Responder following either a 1-NT or a 2-NT opening bid by one’s Partner. It is an extension of the “Jacoby Transfer ” convention, enabling the No-trump Opener to become Declarer when the Responder holds six or more cards in either Major suit and wishes to at least bid game, knowing that Opener can hold no fewer than 2-pieces of the desired Major. With game-level or slam-level holdings when using “ Texas Transfers ,” Responder’s jump to “ 4D ” requires Opener to bid 4H , and a jump by Responder to “ 4H ” requires Opener to bid 4S . This not only allows the stronger hand to remain unexposed, but, additionally, minimizes potential, obstructive interference from the Opponents, and facilitates certain slam bidding sequences, as well. “ Texas Transfer ” bids, like “Jacoby Transfer ” bids, are denoted in “ blue ” on the convention card and, thus, require a different verbalization by the Opener, in this case, the word “ transfer ,” rather than an “ alert ” call. “Jacoby Transfer” and “Texas Transfer” Bids Following Interference Subsequent to a 1-NT opening, “ Jacoby Transfers ” are off following any 2-level suit interference calls (Example 1). But, Responder’s “ Texas Transfer” bids are still on if the interference is 3C or below, and off if the interference is 3D or higher (Examples 2 and 3). Examples: (1) 1-NT – (2C/2D) – 2H (Natural, to play and – 2S (Natural, to play (2) 1-NT – (2C to 3C) – “4D” (A “ Texas Transfer ” to 4H) and - “4H” (A “ Texas Transfer ” to 4S) (3) 1-NT – (3D or higher) – 4H (Natural, to Play) and – 4S (Natural, to Play) Defense Against a “Texas Transfer” Call The standard defense, following a “ Texas Transfer ” bid by one’s Opponents is as follows: 1-NT --- (“Pass”) --- (“4D”or“4H”) --- (“?”) a.
    [Show full text]
  • Make Mine a Madeira Brother Xavier's Double Bridge with Larry Cohen
    A NEW First Edition BRIDGE MAGAZINE January 2018 Make Mine a Madeira Brother Xavier’s Double Bridge With Larry Cohen A NEW BRIDGE MAGAZINE – JANUARY 2018 Under Starter’s Orders take many forms – I have already mentioned Welcome to the pages of A New Bridge Magazine. the possibility of being When Bridge Magazine announced a few weeks ago linked to a column A NEW that it was ceasing publication Ron Tacchi and I within the magazine decided that we could not allow the world’s bridge and you will see from playing public to be deprived of their monthly dose this issue that this is of bridge from some of the world’s best writers. already popular. There BRIDGEAs it appears that a subscription based magazine is also the possibility of linking directly to the title. was no longer a suitable model we have decided Thirdly by becoming a Friend of the magazine. that A New Bridge Magazine will be totally free. That would involve a donation. Anyone donating In the Internet age that we live in this enables us £500 would become a Golden Friend. MAGAZINE to make it available instantaneously to anyone in the world who cares to read it. If you would like to discuss any of the above con- tact me at: [email protected] In order to meet our production costs we are relying on sponsorship, advertising revenue and Ask not what A New Bridge Magazine can do donations. for you – ask what you can do for A New Bridge Editor: Magazine. Mark Horton Sponsorship can come in many forms – one that is proving popular is the sponsorship of a particular Advertising: Dramatis Personae Mark Horton column - as you will see from the association of FunBridge with Misplay these Hands with Me and Now let me tell you something about what you can Photographer: Master Point Press with The Bidding Battle.
    [Show full text]
  • The Bidding Toolkit
    PLAY BRIDGE PLAY can’t raise you, at least he will have a better idea of what to do on defense. Beside guiding the opening lead, he is more likely to figure out your distribution if you overcall. Example #2 Overcalls — part 1 What about this hand: K Q 3 10 7 6 5 3 A 6 3 5 2 The term overcall refers to any J 7 5 K J 9 5 4 K J 4 3 7? Answer: You should pass. You bid by your side after an opponent Most players would overcall 1 have a bad suit and only 9 HCP. If has opened the bidding. Overcalls at the one level. With the 9, your you pass, perhaps partner can act occur frequently, making them an suit is strong enough. You have and then you’ll have a better idea important topic to discuss with your support for spades or diamonds if how to proceed. partners. Many new players have partner introduces either of those Example #3 misconceptions about overcalls, suits. If you defend, partner will be K Q 3 J 7 6 5 3 A 6 3 K 2 however. Following are some better placed. This is an example of Answer: This one is a toss-up. guidelines on how to approach this a suit that is safe to overcall at the Some players would overcall 1, topic. one level, but would be dangerous even with a bad suit. You have 12 Why overcall? to bid at the two level after, for HCP and a well-placed K.
    [Show full text]
  • Member Guide the ACBL from a to Z
    Member Guide The ACBL from A to Z As a member of the ACBL, you are one of more than 167,000 people who enjoy the camaraderie and fun of participating in a game of skill and strategy. ACBL members agree that duplicate bridge is one of the most challenging and exciting mind sports in the world! The ACBL provides a toll-free line that is available Monday through Friday 8 a.m-4:30 p.m. CST, 800–264–2743. You can check on your masterpoint holdings, or leave a message about your magazine, dues status or other concerns, and your call will be returned within 24 hours (excluding weekends and holidays). The ACBL also offers members the opportunity to check masterpoints and get updated bridge information on its website at www.acbl.org. This booklet has been created to provide information of interest and serve as a reference guide to all ACBL members. Please note these special features: A list of ACBL Member Benefits on page 7. A guide to the different types and colors of masterpoints and how to earn them on page 25. The masterpoint ranks that members can achieve on page 34. Website links to lead you to more information online. Enjoy! You hold the winning hand as a member of the ACBL. Be sure to visit www.acbl.org often for the latest news and activities. Follow us on American Contract Bridge League and @ACBLbridge 1 A The ACBL Bridge Series is available for purchase at Baron Barclay Bridge American Contract Bridge League Supply at www.baronbarclay.com or by calling 1-800-274-2221.
    [Show full text]
  • Preemption: WHAT the FRACK IS PREEMPTION?
    12/28/2017 Preemption: WHAT THE FRACK IS PREEMPTION? Presentation Objectives When you leave here today you will be able to: 1. Define “preemption” as it relates to municipal court practice; 2. Understand the political and practical forces affecting the current state of federal, state and local government lawmaking; 3. Identify the different types of preemption; and 4. Understand how to spot and respond to preemption issues when they arise. Preemption is a doctrine in conflicts of law: when a superior government (as of a state) has undertaken to regulate a subject its laws supersede those of an inferior government (as of a municipality). 1 12/28/2017 UNITED STATES CONSTITUTION Supremacy Clause: “This Constitution, and the Laws of the United States which shall be made in Pursuance thereof; and all Treaties made, or which shall be made, under the Authority of the United States, shall be the supreme Law of the Land; and the Judges in every State shall be bound thereby, any Thing in the Constitution or Laws of any State to the Contrary notwithstanding.” UNITED STATES CONSTITUTION 10th Amendment: “The powers not delegated to the United States by the Constitution, nor prohibited by it to the States, are reserved to the States respectively, or to the people.” 2 12/28/2017 John Dickinson, a Virginia delegate, wrote of this concept of state rule “The government of each stateis,andistobe,sovereigninallmattersthat relate to each state only. It is to be subordinate barely in those matters that relate to the whole, and it will be their own faults, if the several states suffer the federal sovereignty to interfere in the things of their respective jurisdictions.” State Governing Structures: Dillon’s Rule Home Rule LOCAL CONTROL vs.
    [Show full text]