Services Boulder
Total Page：16
File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb
Load more
Recommended publications
-
Tt Fall 12 Web.Pub
VOL. 53 No. 3 FALL 2012 Meet Michigan’s winning mini-Spingold squad Editor’s note: A team of five 20-something Ann Arbor players won the 0-1500 mini- Spingold KO, a multi- day limited national championship, at the summer North Ameri- can Bridge Champion- ships in Philadelphia. A month earlier, they also won the Sunday Winners of the mini-Spingold 0-1500 Swiss Teams at the KO Teams: (front) Jin Hu and Jonathan Fleischmann; (back) Max Glick, Zach- Toledo Regional. ary Scherr and Zachary Wasserman. Here are their stories: Jonathan Fleischmann ter. I'm an attorney less than a year out of law school. I'm 24 years old and live in I started playing in 1999 Bloomfield Hills with my fa- (Continued on page 22) ther, two brothers, and a sis- DON’T FORGET TO VOTE The annual election for MBA Board of Directors will be held during the last four days of the October regional. If you cannot be there on one of those days, you can still vote by complet- ing and sending in an absentee ballot. See page 5. Candi- dates’ pictures and statements appear on pages 6 and 7. Michigan Bridge Association Unit #137 2012 VINCE & JOAN REMEY MOTOR CITY REGIONAL October 8-14, 2012 Site: William Costick Center, 28600 Eleven Mile Road, Farmington Hills MI 48336 (between Inkster and Middlebelt roads) 248-473-1816 Intermediate/Newcomers Schedule (0-299 MP) Single-session Stratified Open Pairs: Tue. through Fri., 1 p.m. & 7 p.m.; Sat., 10 a.m. & 2:30 p.m. -
40Ppfinal (0708)
Washington www.Washington BridgeLeague.org Bridge League Sept./Oct. 2002 B♣U♥L♠L♦E♥T♣I♠N Thursday, October 10 ♣Stratified Open Pairs ............................................................................ 10:30am Washington Bridge Center,,, 1620 Elton Road, Silver Spring MD ♦StrataFlighted Open Pairs (both sites) + Stratified 199er Pairs (Christ the King Church only) or Stratified 99er Pairs (Beth El only) Beth El Congregation, 3830 Seminary Rd, Alexandria .......................... 7:00pm Christ the King Church, 2301 Colston Drive, Silver Spring ................... 7:30pm Capital Beltway to Connecticut Ave. South. Left on East-West Hwy. Right on Grubb Rd. 1st left on Colston. The church is one block on the left. * * * * Remainder of Tournament held at White Oak Armory Only * * * * 12200 Cherry Hill Road, Silver Spring MD Capital Beltway East to US 29 North (Exit 30A- toward Columbia) or Capital Beltway West to MD 193 West (Exit 29 - toward Wheaton); go ½ mile and turn right on US 29 North. Go north 4 miles, then right on Cherry Hill Rd. Right on Robert L. Finn Dr. (immediately after Toyota dealer) and left into parking lot. Friday, October 11 ♥Stratified Open Pairs (single sessions).................. 10:00am, 2:00pm & 8:00pm ♠Stratified Senior Pairs (single sessions) .............................. 10:00am & 2:00pm ♣Intermediate/Novice Pairs (single sessions) ......... 10:00am, 2:00pm & 8:00pm ♦Stratified Triple Nickel Swiss Teams, VPs ............................................. 8:00pm Saturday, October 12 ♥Stratified Senior Pairs (single sessions) ................................. 9:30am &1:30pm ♠Newcomer Pairs (0-5 masterpoints) ........................................................ 1:30pm ♣50/20/10/5 Special 49er Stratified Trophy Pairs ................................ 1:30pm ♦StrataFlighted Open Pairs (single sessions)......................... 1:30pm & 7:00pm ♥StrataFlighted Open Pairs (single sessions)........................ -
CONTEXT in BIDDING by Maritha Pottenger
CONTEXT IN BIDDING by Maritha Pottenger Bridge auctions depend a lot upon the context. The same bid can mean several different things, depending on who makes it, when it is bid, and what has been bid before it. A common example is the 2NT bid. If your partner opens a major; RHO passes and you bid 2NT, that is usually Jacoby 2NT—showing a forcing major raise with 4 trumps, no singletons, no voids, and an opening hand (or better). Jacoby 2NT and Splinters are reciprocal bids, so using Jacoby 2NT denies having a hand that could splinter, i.e., you do not have a singleton or a void. If your partner opens a minor, RHO passes, and you bid 2NT, most people play that as Limit 2NT (11-12 HCP), but some people play it 13-15 HCP. (Discuss with your partner!) Clearly this bid also denies having a 4- card major. If you have a 4-card major, bidding that suit should be your first response to partner’s minor because a 4-4 fit usually plays a trick better than notrump. If your partner opens a suit and RHO doubles, 2NT by you is usually Jordan 2NT. It promises a limit raise (or better) in your partner’s suit. (Some people play Jordan 2NT only over major openings.) Since you can use Jordan 2NT to show the Limit Raise (or better), a jump raise becomes weak. A redouble implies no fit (and desire to possibly double the opponents). Over opponent’s take-out double, a new suit is forcing at the one level, but not at the two level. -
Practical Slam Bidding Ebook
Practical Slam Bidding ebook RON KLINGER MAKE THE MOST OF YOUR BIG HANDS INTRODUCTION Slam bidding brings an excitement all of its own. The pulse quickens, adrenalin is pumping, it’s all systems go. The culmination can be euphoria when you are successful, misery when the slam fails. The aim of this book is to increase your euphoria-to-misery ratio. Of all the skills in bridge, experts perform worst in the slam area. You do not need to go far to find the reason: Lack of experience. Slams occur on about 10% of all deals. Compare that with 50% for partscores and 40% for games. No wonder players are less familiar with the big hands. Half of the slam hands will be yours, half will go to your opponents. You can thus expect a slam your way about 5% of the time. That is roughly one deal per session. If you play twice a week, you can hope for about a hundred slams a year. Practise on the 120 deals in this book and study them, and you will have the equivalent of an extra year’s training under your belt. Your euphoria ratio is then bound to rise. How to use this ebook This is not so much an ebook for reading pleasure as a workbook. It is ideal for partnership practice but you can also use it on your own. For each set of hands, the dealer is given, followed by the vulnerability. You and partner are the East and West. If the dealer is North, East comes next; if the dealer is South, West is next. -
System Notes
System Notes James Sundstrom Nathan Savir April 9, 2009 Notation Legend M Either Major. If used multiple times, it always refers to the same major. For example, 1M-2| -2M means either the auction 1~ -2| - 2~ or 1♠ -2| -2♠ , no other auction. m Either minor. As per M. OM Other major. This is only used after 'M', such as 1m-1M-2NT-3OM. om Other minor. As per OM. R Raise. Used in some of the step based system to mean a simple raise, such as 1~ -2~ . DR Double Raise. Q Cuebid. Acknowledgements Special thanks are owed to Blair Seidler, without whose teaching I probably would not ever have written these notes. If I did write them, they surely would not be nearly as good as they are. These notes are a (mostly very-distant) relative of his Carnage notes, though a few sections have been borrowed directly from Carnage. 1 Contents I Non-Competitive Auctions4 1 Opening Bid Summary6 2 Minor Suit Auctions7 2.1 Minor-Major................................7 2.1.1 Suit Bypassing Agreements...................7 2.1.2 New Minor Forcing........................7 2.1.3 Reverses..............................8 2.2 Minor Oriented Auctions.........................8 2.3 NT Oriented auctions...........................8 2.4 Passed Hand Bidding...........................8 3 Major Suit Auctions9 3.1 1 over 1 Auctions.............................9 3.2 Major Suit Raise Structure........................9 3.2.1 Direct Raises...........................9 3.2.2 Bergen...............................9 3.2.3 Jacoby 2NT............................9 3.2.4 3NT................................ 10 3.2.5 Splinters.............................. 10 3.3 Passed Hand................................ 10 3.3.1 Drury.............................. -
Mayor Government He Was Wrong
PAGE TWi iIX — MANCHEISTER e v e n in g h e r a l d , Manchfester, Conn., Tues.. Feb. 12, 1974 mm WEIGHT Labor Leaders Give Meskill PROBLEM? Views On Energy Problems usi HARTFORD-U A P T m D r \« (UPI)/TTT>Tv - Gov.. __ E-LiM —'They want promotional Thomas J. Meskill Monday all their resources. Excess,water in the body can be utility^ rate structures Driscoll said oil companies uncomfortable. &LlM ^11 help asked labor leaders for “input flattened” so small energy yoii lose excess water weight. We for his energy message “are actually public utilities at Liggett Rexill Drug recom users don’t pay more per unit and should be put under price mend It. Wednesday and he got lots of it. than large users, According to MANCHESTER. CONN., WEDNESDAY, FEB: 13, 1974- VOL. XCUI, No. 114 Manchester—A City of Village Charm In a well-attended meeting at quotas. They should be treated Leonard F. Dube of the United as utilities.” Only $2.00 TWENTY-FOUR PAGES - TWO SECTIONS PRICEt FIPfEEN CENTS the state armory, labor leaders Auto Workers. •' said: —They favor more research, ' —They want gasoline stations by ar non-profit corporation if open when they can buy gas necessary, into more efficient oline, not just when they are at SHES SPECIAL! work. engines and heaters which I^ T HER KNOW WITH pollute less and require less —They resent the large fuel. burden of energy - related cost It was suggested that at least increases being passed on to the M6skill Asks Rationing Pow6rs partial elimination of the consumer, whose purchasing crisscrossing of the state by power has declined con workers who could be working Surpriae Her With Favoritism Banned siderably. -
The Perceptions of Policymakers on the Transfer Pathway in Texas Public
THE PERCEPTIONS OF POLICYMAKERS ON THE TRANSFER PATHWAY IN TEXAS PUBLIC HIGHER EDUCATION Kimberly A. Faris Dissertation Prepared for the Degree of DOCTOR OF PHILOSOPHY UNIVERSITY OF NORTH TEXAS May 2016 APPROVED: Amy Fann, Major Professor Beverly Bower, Committee Member Marc Cutright, Committee Member Celia Williamson, Committee Member Daniel Chen, Program Coordinator for Higher Education Jan Holden, Chair of the Department of Counseling and Higher Education Jerry Thomas, Dean of the College of Education Costas Tsatsoulis, Interim Dean of the Toulouse Graduate School Faris, Kimberly. The Perceptions of Policymakers on the Transfer Pathway in Texas Public Higher Education. Doctor of Philosophy (Higher Education), May 2016, 272 pp., 1 table, references, 144 titles. Community college students transfer to public universities experiencing a pathway filled with complexity and inequity. Transfer students are not able to graduate at the same pace as native students at the university and complete their baccalaureate degrees 18% below the rate of native students. Policymakers have attempted to address the baccalaureate gap. This qualitative study explored the perspectives of Texas policymakers and policy influencers on the efficacy of policies intended to improve transfer outcomes. This study investigated what experience participants have with transfer policy, what their perceptions of the transfer pathway are, and how their voices can refine an understanding of policy development and ways to improve student persistence. Purposeful sampling was used to explore the perspectives of 14 Texas policymakers and those that influence policy. Findings revealed that significant gaps exist between expectations and student realities and that the completion agenda is driving policy decisions. Participants perceived that transfer students have been ignored in the completion metrics, which influence institutional priorities. -
Bidding Notes
Bidding Notes Paul F. Dubois February 19, 2015 CONTENTS 1 Preliminaries 6 1.1 How to Use This Book.....................................6 1.2 Casual Partners.........................................7 1.3 Acknowledgments.......................................7 1.4 Notation and Nomenclature...................................7 1.5 The Captain Concept......................................8 2 Hand Evaluation 9 2.1 Basic System..........................................9 2.1.1 Adjusting to the Auction................................ 10 2.1.2 Losing Trick Count................................... 10 2.2 Bergen Method......................................... 11 2.3 Examples............................................ 11 2.4 What Bid To Open....................................... 11 3 Reverses 13 3.1 Reverses by Opener....................................... 13 3.1.1 Responding To Opener’s Reverse........................... 13 3.2 Reverses By Responder..................................... 14 4 Opening Notrump 15 4.1 How To Choose A Response To 1N.............................. 15 4.1.1 Responding With No Major Suit Or Long Minor................... 16 4.1.2 Responding With A Major Suit Or Long Minor.................... 16 4.2 Stayman Convention...................................... 16 4.3 Major Transfers......................................... 17 4.3.1 When the transfer is doubled or overcalled...................... 18 4.3.2 Interference before transfers.............................. 19 4.4 When Responder Is 5-4 In The Majors............................ -
Bolish Club Contents
Bolish Club A system that has evolved from EHAA+ (my version of EHAA, Every Hand An Adventure), and is now more similar to Polish Club. Other sources of inspiration are Keri by Ron Klinger, Ambra by Benito Garozzo, and Einari Club (a local Blue-team-like system, something of a standard in Turku). BC includes natural or strong 1|, 5-card majors, 2-over-1 game forcing, and responders 2| as relay in most situations. By Jari BÄoling,some based on ideas and discussions with Kurt-Erik HÄaggblom,Jyrki Lahtonen, and Ensio Lehtinen, last updated January 5, 2007 Contents 1 The 1| opening 2 1.1 Interference over 1| ......................................... 8 2 The 1} opening 10 3 Major openings 10 3.1 Choosing response in borderline cases . 12 3.2 The semi-forcing 1NT response . 12 3.3 The 1M-2| relay . 14 3.3.1 After interference . 15 3.3.2 A natural alternative . 15 4 The weak twos 16 4.1 New suit bids ask for stoppers and length . 16 4.2 Jump shifts are control asking bids . 17 4.3 2NT is an invitational or better raise . 17 4.4 The weak 2| opening . 18 4.5 Competition . 18 4.5.1 The McCabe convention . 19 5 The 2| opening as 17{18 balanced 19 6 2} Wilkosz 20 7 2| Multi-Wilkosz 20 8 Semi-balanced 2M 21 9 2} multi 22 10 The 2NT opening 22 BC Opening Bids Opening strength description conventional response frequency 1| a) 11{17 2+ clubs 2|, 2}, 2NT, 3} 8.5(9.7)% b) 18+ any shape (excluding 23-24 bal.) 1}=0{5 hcpts 3.2% 1} 11{17 4+ diamonds 2|, 2}, 2NT, 3| 8.6(9.5)% 1~ 11{17¤ 5+ hearts 2|, 2}, 2NT 6.7% 1Ä 11{17¤ 5+ spades 2|, 2~, 2NT 6.9% 1NT a) -
Lesson 2 – 2 Over 1 for Beginners Bergen Raises and Jacoby 2NT
Lesson 2 – 2 Over 1 for Beginners Bergen Raises and Jacoby 2NT Requirements: These are the requirements to use Bergen raises or Jacoby 2NT by Responder: 1. Opener must be in 1 st or 2 nd seat. (Explained, this means: The dealer is considered to be in 1 st seat. The next player to bid is in 2 nd seat. If two or more players pass before the first player bids, then Bergen raises and Jacoby 2NT do not apply.) 2. There cannot be an opening or intervening bid by opponent. Remember: Seat 3 or Seat 4 could be a weak opening or have other considerations, so these 2/1 bids do not apply when your partner opens in 3rd or 4 th seat. An overcall by your partner over a bid by opponent could be weak also. So to use these bids, the opening bid must have been made by your partner in 1st or 2 nd seat – no exceptions to that! And the opening bid must be a major suit. If Opener bid a minor or 1NT, these bids do not apply. When do you use Bergen Raises or Jacoby 2NT? You must have 4-card support for your Partner’s major opening bid. All of these bids are alertable by the Opener. As soon as the Responder bids any of them, the Opener must announce “Alert” and/or show the Alert card from the bidding box. What is the reason for that? The reason for the “Alert” is to show that these responses are all conventions and have different meanings from what would normally be expected. -
Bergen Raises and Jacoby 2NT Bergen Raises: Immediate Response of 3♣ Or 3♦ by Responder
Lesson 2 – “2/1” for Beginners Topic: Bergen Raises and Jacoby 2NT Bergen Raises: Immediate response of 3♣ or 3♦ by Responder. Jacoby 2NT: Immediate response of 2NT by Responder. Why are these bids used? They are used by Responder to show 4+-card support for Opener’s major suit. Having at least 9 trump gives your hand extra strength. You can often make Game or a slam with fewer points than usual. Requirements for Bergen Raises or Jacoby 2NT by Responder: 1. Opener must be in 1st or 2nd seat* and have opened 1♥ or 1♠. 2. Responder must have 4-card support (or better) for Opener’s major suit. 3. Responder must have at least 8 points. 4. There cannot be an opening bid or intervening bid by opponent (except a “double”). *Seat position was explained in Lesson 1, but here is a re-cap: The dealer is considered to be in 1st seat. The next player sits in the 2nd seat. Opener must be in one of these seats for Bergen Raises or Jacoby 2NT to apply. Another way to think of it is: If you passed and your partner opens, these conventions do not apply. Important to Note: Immediately after the Responder bids using a Bergen Raise or Jacoby 2NT, the Opener must alert it before the next player bids. The way to do that is to say “Alert,” tap the Alert card on the table, then put the Alert card back in the bidding box. The reason for the “Alert” is to show your opponents that these responses are special conventions and have different meanings from what would normally be expected. -
What's Standard?
play bridge What’s Standard? Using Grant Standard: Responding to 1NT — by David Lindop ߜ Previous articles in this series, the Transfers and Slam ♠ A J A hand like this is a ♥ K Q 9 8 5 Grant Basic and Grant Standard With a five-card or longer major, it little more awkward. ♦ A Q 10 7 Summary Charts, and corresponding seems automatic to start with a We aren’t sure if we convention cards, can be found at ♣ 7 3 transfer when partner opens 1NT. belong in slam and www.audreygrant.com. However, if we also have 16 or more we also don’t know whether we or responding to 1NT, the points and are interested in reaching belong in hearts, diamonds, or Summary Chart gives an slam, we must look ahead. A simple notrump. Fortunately, we can do a Foverview of our methods: raise after a transfer is only inviting little exploration because a new suit game and a jump to game is a signoff. is forcing after a Jacoby transfer. RESPONSES How do we show slam interest? We can begin the auction like this: ♣ 2 : Stayman ♠ KJ 3 Here we have 16 OPENER RESPONDER ♦ 2 : 5+ hearts (transfer) ♥ K J 9 7 4 high-card points plus 1NT 2♦ ♥ 2 : 5+ spades (transfer) ♦ A Q 1 length point for the 2♥ 3♦ 2♠: transfer to 3♣ ♣ Q 9 4 ♦ (to sign off in clubs or diamonds) five-card suit. That’s Our transfer bid of 2 shows five or enough to invite slam but not enough more hearts and our subsequent bid 3♣/3♦: 6+ suit; invit.