DOCSLIB.ORG

“Texas Transfers” Vs “Jacoby Transfers”

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
“Texas Transfers” Vs “Jacoby Transfers” “Texas Transfers” vs “Jacoby Transfers” A “ Texas Transfer ” is a transfer bid used by a Responder following either a 1-NT or a 2-NT opening bid by one’s Partner. It is an extension of the “Jacoby Transfer ” convention, enabling the No-trump Opener to become Declarer when the Responder holds six or more cards in either Major suit and wishes to at least bid game, knowing that Opener can hold no fewer than 2-pieces of the desired Major. With game-level or slam-level holdings when using “ Texas Transfers ,” Responder’s jump to “ 4D ” requires Opener to bid 4H , and a jump by Responder to “ 4H ” requires Opener to bid 4S . This not only allows the stronger hand to remain unexposed, but, additionally, minimizes potential, obstructive interference from the Opponents, and facilitates certain slam bidding sequences, as well. “ Texas Transfer ” bids, like “Jacoby Transfer ” bids, are denoted in “ blue ” on the convention card and, thus, require a different verbalization by the Opener, in this case, the word “ transfer ,” rather than an “ alert ” call. “Jacoby Transfer” and “Texas Transfer” Bids Following Interference Subsequent to a 1-NT opening, “ Jacoby Transfers ” are off following any 2-level suit interference calls (Example 1). But, Responder’s “ Texas Transfer” bids are still on if the interference is 3C or below, and off if the interference is 3D or higher (Examples 2 and 3). Examples: (1) 1-NT – (2C/2D) – 2H (Natural, to play and – 2S (Natural, to play (2) 1-NT – (2C to 3C) – “4D” (A “ Texas Transfer ” to 4H) and - “4H” (A “ Texas Transfer ” to 4S) (3) 1-NT – (3D or higher) – 4H (Natural, to Play) and – 4S (Natural, to Play) Defense Against a “Texas Transfer” Call The standard defense, following a “ Texas Transfer ” bid by one’s Opponents is as follows: 1-NT --- (“Pass”) --- (“4D”or“4H”) --- (“?”) a. A “ double” is one-suited, and is “ lead-directing ” b. A “4-NT ” call is for the Minors c. A 4-level bid of Responder’s asked-for, suit is a take-out, “Michaels Cue- bid ” for the two referenced suits d. A “ delayed double ” after Opener accepts the transfer is a three-suited take- out Using a Delayed “Texas Transfer” With the acknowledged understanding that a 4-4 Major suit game-level contract usually plays better than a 5-3 or 6-2 Major suit game-level contract, a so-called Delayed “Texas Transfer ” sequence can be employed seeking, firstly, a preferred 4-4 fit, if one is available, by means of an initial use of “ Stayman ,” followed by a fall-back “ Texas Transfer ” sequence to a known 6-2 or 6-3 Major suit fit, if the 4-4 fit is not initially uncovered. Example: 1-NT – “2C” – “2D” – “4D”(“4H”) – 4H(4S) 1 Responder, here, holds game values, four pieces of one of the Major suits, and 6 or more pieces of the alternate Major. Having failed to find Opener with a possible 4-4 fit by virtue of Opener’s “ 2D ” response to Responder’s initial “Stayman ,” “2C ” call, Responder can now use a 4-level “ Texas Transfer ” to make Opener the Declarer in the known 6-2 or 6-3 final game-level contract. “Jacoby Transfers” vs. “Texas Transfers” With game-values and a 6-card or longer Major suit holding, Responder has the option of employing either a 2-level “Jacoby Transfer ” sequence, or a 4-level “ Texas Transfer ” sequence, to reach a desired, final, game-level, 4H or 4S contract. The treatments are similar, but there is one benefit that results from Responder having the availability and use of either of these two conventions. The duplicity of techniques by which a Major suit game-level contract can be achieved, carries with it the generally-accepted understanding that Responder’s “ Texas Transfer ” sequence, followed by a game-level bid shows that Responder holds 11-15 HCP’s, and does not carry with it the potential for a Slam. Using a “ Texas Transfer ” followed by a “ Pass ” becomes the only way to force a sign-off game. It shows game values with a 6 card or longer major suit holding and no Slam potential . 1-NT – “4D”(“4H”) – 4H(4S) – Pass ------------------------------------------------------------------- On the other hand, the use of a “Jacoby Transfer ” sequence, followed by a game-level bid, shows that Responder holds 16 (+) HCP’s, and caries with it an invitation for the No-Trump opening bidder to seek Slam, if the Opener holds a maximum HCP initial No-Trump holding and, therefore, deems it plausible that a Slam might be present. 1-NT – “2D”(“2H”) - 2H(2S) – 4H(4S) - ? Interpretation of a “4-NT” Call Susequent to Both Transfer Sequences The meaning of the follow-up bid of “ 4-NT ,” subsequent to a game-level Major suit contract having been achieved via the use of a “Jacoby Transfer ,” sequence is, by consensus, different than the use of a follow-up bid of “ 4-NT ” subsequent to a “ Texas Transfer ” sequence. In both instances, Responder holds no fewer than game-values, but the inference of any subsequent “4-NT ” bid differs. 1-NT – “2D”(“2H”) - 2H(2S) - “4-NT” After a “Jacoby Transfer ” sequence, the consensus is that a bid of “ 4-NT ” is quantitative . It asks Opener to either: (a) “Pass” with a minimum No-Trump opening count and 2 trump pieces (b) Bid 5H (5S) with a minimum No-Trump opening count and 3 (+) trump pieces (c) Bid 6-NT - with a maximum No-Trump opening count and 2 trump pieces (d) Bid 6H (6S) - with a maximum No-Trump opening count and 3 (+) trump pieces 1-NT – “4D”(“4H”) – 4H(4S) - “4-NT” After a “Texas Transfer ” sequence, the consensus is that a bid of “ 4-NT ” is conventional (“Blackwood”) . Opener, here, may not pass , since it is Ace-Asking and Opener is forced to respond to the Ace-Asking request with any agreed-to variation of Blackwood; i.e., either regular Blackwood, else Roman Keycard Blackwood (0314 or 1430). 2.
Load more

Recommended publications
  • Tt Fall 12 Web.Pub
    VOL. 53 No. 3 FALL 2012 Meet Michigan’s winning mini-Spingold squad Editor’s note: A team of five 20-something Ann Arbor players won the 0-1500 mini- Spingold KO, a multi- day limited national championship, at the summer North Ameri- can Bridge Champion- ships in Philadelphia. A month earlier, they also won the Sunday Winners of the mini-Spingold 0-1500 Swiss Teams at the KO Teams: (front) Jin Hu and Jonathan Fleischmann; (back) Max Glick, Zach- Toledo Regional. ary Scherr and Zachary Wasserman. Here are their stories: Jonathan Fleischmann ter. I'm an attorney less than a year out of law school. I'm 24 years old and live in I started playing in 1999 Bloomfield Hills with my fa- (Continued on page 22) ther, two brothers, and a sis- DON’T FORGET TO VOTE The annual election for MBA Board of Directors will be held during the last four days of the October regional. If you cannot be there on one of those days, you can still vote by complet- ing and sending in an absentee ballot. See page 5. Candi- dates’ pictures and statements appear on pages 6 and 7. Michigan Bridge Association Unit #137 2012 VINCE & JOAN REMEY MOTOR CITY REGIONAL October 8-14, 2012 Site: William Costick Center, 28600 Eleven Mile Road, Farmington Hills MI 48336 (between Inkster and Middlebelt roads) 248-473-1816 Intermediate/Newcomers Schedule (0-299 MP) Single-session Stratified Open Pairs: Tue. through Fri., 1 p.m. & 7 p.m.; Sat., 10 a.m. & 2:30 p.m.
    [Show full text]
  • The Rubensohl Convention
    Review sheet 61UZ-2 10/01/2021 The Rubensohl convention You will use the Rubensohl convention in response to your partner's 1 NT opening, but after an overcall. Here is the simplified theory of this convention. After a natural overcall 2 ♦, 2 ♥ or 2 ♠ Any level 2 bid is natural Above 2 NT any bid is a Jacoby transfer. 2 NT is artificial (Jacoby for ♣) An impossible Jacoby becomes a Stayman A double is a take-out double : it could be a Stayman with 8 HCP, or show a balanced hand with 8 HCP or more. S W N E 1NT 2 ♦ 2 ♥ 5 4 3 A Q 7 6 5 6 5 4 8 7 ♠ ♠ ♠ ♥ ♥ ♥ ♥ ♥ ♣ ♣ ♣ ♦ ♦ Exercise E5867 2 ♥ showing 5 ♥ cards and a maximum of 7 HCP. S W N E 1NT 2 ♥ 3 ♦ K J 5 4 4 A J 5 4 Q 10 9 2 ♠ ♠ ♠ ♠ ♥ ♣ ♣ ♣ ♣ ♦ ♦ ♦ ♦ Exercise E5871 3 ♦ Impossible Jacoby (the opponent's overcall is ♥, therefore the responder can't be willing to play ♥ !) : this is a Stayman with 4 ♠ cards and short ♥ : game forcing Page 1 Nous retrouver sur www.ibridge.fr vous permet de parfaire votre bridge. En jouant des donnes, en accédant aux leçons de votre niveau et au recueil des fiches techniques. Review sheet 61UZ-2 10/01/2021 The Rubensohl convention After a natural level 2 overcall Bidding a suit at level 2 is natural and non forcing : the responder holds a maximum of 7 HCP Doubling is not punitive : A double requires a minimum of 7-8 HCP and most of the time shows a hand with which the responder would have bid 2 NT (with no overcall).
    [Show full text]
  • System Notes
    System Notes James Sundstrom Nathan Savir April 9, 2009 Notation Legend M Either Major. If used multiple times, it always refers to the same major. For example, 1M-2| -2M means either the auction 1~ -2| - 2~ or 1♠ -2| -2♠ , no other auction. m Either minor. As per M. OM Other major. This is only used after 'M', such as 1m-1M-2NT-3OM. om Other minor. As per OM. R Raise. Used in some of the step based system to mean a simple raise, such as 1~ -2~ . DR Double Raise. Q Cuebid. Acknowledgements Special thanks are owed to Blair Seidler, without whose teaching I probably would not ever have written these notes. If I did write them, they surely would not be nearly as good as they are. These notes are a (mostly very-distant) relative of his Carnage notes, though a few sections have been borrowed directly from Carnage. 1 Contents I Non-Competitive Auctions4 1 Opening Bid Summary6 2 Minor Suit Auctions7 2.1 Minor-Major................................7 2.1.1 Suit Bypassing Agreements...................7 2.1.2 New Minor Forcing........................7 2.1.3 Reverses..............................8 2.2 Minor Oriented Auctions.........................8 2.3 NT Oriented auctions...........................8 2.4 Passed Hand Bidding...........................8 3 Major Suit Auctions9 3.1 1 over 1 Auctions.............................9 3.2 Major Suit Raise Structure........................9 3.2.1 Direct Raises...........................9 3.2.2 Bergen...............................9 3.2.3 Jacoby 2NT............................9 3.2.4 3NT................................ 10 3.2.5 Splinters.............................. 10 3.3 Passed Hand................................ 10 3.3.1 Drury..............................
    [Show full text]
  • The Perceptions of Policymakers on the Transfer Pathway in Texas Public
    THE PERCEPTIONS OF POLICYMAKERS ON THE TRANSFER PATHWAY IN TEXAS PUBLIC HIGHER EDUCATION Kimberly A. Faris Dissertation Prepared for the Degree of DOCTOR OF PHILOSOPHY UNIVERSITY OF NORTH TEXAS May 2016 APPROVED: Amy Fann, Major Professor Beverly Bower, Committee Member Marc Cutright, Committee Member Celia Williamson, Committee Member Daniel Chen, Program Coordinator for Higher Education Jan Holden, Chair of the Department of Counseling and Higher Education Jerry Thomas, Dean of the College of Education Costas Tsatsoulis, Interim Dean of the Toulouse Graduate School Faris, Kimberly. The Perceptions of Policymakers on the Transfer Pathway in Texas Public Higher Education. Doctor of Philosophy (Higher Education), May 2016, 272 pp., 1 table, references, 144 titles. Community college students transfer to public universities experiencing a pathway filled with complexity and inequity. Transfer students are not able to graduate at the same pace as native students at the university and complete their baccalaureate degrees 18% below the rate of native students. Policymakers have attempted to address the baccalaureate gap. This qualitative study explored the perspectives of Texas policymakers and policy influencers on the efficacy of policies intended to improve transfer outcomes. This study investigated what experience participants have with transfer policy, what their perceptions of the transfer pathway are, and how their voices can refine an understanding of policy development and ways to improve student persistence. Purposeful sampling was used to explore the perspectives of 14 Texas policymakers and those that influence policy. Findings revealed that significant gaps exist between expectations and student realities and that the completion agenda is driving policy decisions. Participants perceived that transfer students have been ignored in the completion metrics, which influence institutional priorities.
    [Show full text]
  • Standard System Card Opening Bids Competitive
    BASIC RESPONSES AUSTRALIAN BRIDGE FEDERATION Jump raises - minors limit forcing other preemptive INCORPORATED © Jump raises - majors limit forcing other preemptive STANDARD SYSTEM CARD Jump shifts after minor opening 2H/S weak; Other minor = raise Names: Sartaj Hans Tony Nunn Jump shifts after major opening bergen ABF Nos: Responses to strong 2 suit opening 2S = dbl neg. Basic System: Natural, variable NT Responses to 2NT opening 5 card stayman Classification: Green Blue Red Yellow PLAY CONVENTIONS OPENING BIDS 'NT' Versus Notrump 'S' Versus Suit = Both Describe strength, minimum length, or specific meaning Canape Sequence leads: Overlead all All except AK x (x) 1A 3 1B 3 1C 5 (4 in 3rd) 1D 5 (4 in 3rd) Underlead other A/Q = rev. att; K = rev. cnt; generally overlead 1 NT (11)12-14 ; 14-16 in 3rd vul may contain 5 card major Four or more with an honour 4th highestNT attitude 2A Stayman: simple extended other 3rd/5thS other transfers 2B hearts 2C spades 2D clubs From 4 small 2nd highest other 2 NTdiamonds other From 3 cards (no honour) topNT middleNT bottom S 2A weak, both majors, 4+ 4+ , 0-10 HCP Signal on partner's lead: high encourage low encourage 2B game force other 2C weak, 5/6 hearts, 0-10 HCP Signal on declarer's lead reverse count 2D weak, 5/6 spades, 0-10 HCP Discards McKenney high encourage low encourage 2 NT 20-22 odd/even other then reverse count 3 NT Gambling ; To Play in 3rd/4th Count natural reverse PRE-ALERTS: CALLS THAT MAY HAVE UNEXPECTED MEANING/S OR REQUIRE SPECIAL DEFENCE CONVENTIONS 3rd seat vul NT is 14-16, 4cM NT bids could be offshape.
    [Show full text]
  • March 2018 ACBL Bridge Bulletin Notes Jeff Kroll Sam Khayatt
    March 2018 ACBL Bridge Bulletin Notes Jeff Kroll Sam Khayatt Reisinger BAM Teams (p. 14 – 16) Page 15, column 1, fifth paragraph: When West doesn’t find the killing spade lead, 7C is made by setting up dummy’s diamonds. Declarer realized that both the CK and C7 are needed entries to the diamond suit. Don’t pull trump at tricks two and three. Pull them as you use the K and 7 as transportation to the diamonds. Page 15, column 2, sixth paragraph: the SQ is played by declarer to finesse against the SK. West chose to cover, the correct play. West is trying to set up his S9. When East plays the S7 then shows out, declarer unblocks the S8 to finesse against West’s S9. Gordon, page 32, topic 1: when you alert and are asked to explain, you must give an explanation of the alerted bid. If you end up declaring, you must give an explanation of any undisclosed agreement, and any misinformation given in the auction, before the opening lead. On defense, you must wait until after the deal to divulge any misinformation – you can’t clear it up for partner. The Bidding Box (p. 37 – 39) Problem 1 Both Easts appropriately pass after North opens 1S: East… Is not strong enough to double and bid, Cannot make a takeout double with only a doubleton heart double, and Cannot overcall that four- card diamond suit– especially at the two-level. East must pass and count on partner to keep the auction open in the balancing position.
    [Show full text]
  • Bidding Notes
    Bidding Notes Paul F. Dubois February 19, 2015 CONTENTS 1 Preliminaries 6 1.1 How to Use This Book.....................................6 1.2 Casual Partners.........................................7 1.3 Acknowledgments.......................................7 1.4 Notation and Nomenclature...................................7 1.5 The Captain Concept......................................8 2 Hand Evaluation 9 2.1 Basic System..........................................9 2.1.1 Adjusting to the Auction................................ 10 2.1.2 Losing Trick Count................................... 10 2.2 Bergen Method......................................... 11 2.3 Examples............................................ 11 2.4 What Bid To Open....................................... 11 3 Reverses 13 3.1 Reverses by Opener....................................... 13 3.1.1 Responding To Opener’s Reverse........................... 13 3.2 Reverses By Responder..................................... 14 4 Opening Notrump 15 4.1 How To Choose A Response To 1N.............................. 15 4.1.1 Responding With No Major Suit Or Long Minor................... 16 4.1.2 Responding With A Major Suit Or Long Minor.................... 16 4.2 Stayman Convention...................................... 16 4.3 Major Transfers......................................... 17 4.3.1 When the transfer is doubled or overcalled...................... 18 4.3.2 Interference before transfers.............................. 19 4.4 When Responder Is 5-4 In The Majors............................
    [Show full text]
  • What's Standard?
    play bridge What’s Standard? Using Grant Standard: Responding to 1NT — by David Lindop ߜ Previous articles in this series, the Transfers and Slam ♠ A J A hand like this is a ♥ K Q 9 8 5 Grant Basic and Grant Standard With a five-card or longer major, it little more awkward. ♦ A Q 10 7 Summary Charts, and corresponding seems automatic to start with a We aren’t sure if we convention cards, can be found at ♣ 7 3 transfer when partner opens 1NT. belong in slam and www.audreygrant.com. However, if we also have 16 or more we also don’t know whether we or responding to 1NT, the points and are interested in reaching belong in hearts, diamonds, or Summary Chart gives an slam, we must look ahead. A simple notrump. Fortunately, we can do a Foverview of our methods: raise after a transfer is only inviting little exploration because a new suit game and a jump to game is a signoff. is forcing after a Jacoby transfer. RESPONSES How do we show slam interest? We can begin the auction like this: ♣ 2 : Stayman ♠ KJ 3 Here we have 16 OPENER RESPONDER ♦ 2 : 5+ hearts (transfer) ♥ K J 9 7 4 high-card points plus 1NT 2♦ ♥ 2 : 5+ spades (transfer) ♦ A Q 1 length point for the 2♥ 3♦ 2♠: transfer to 3♣ ♣ Q 9 4 ♦ (to sign off in clubs or diamonds) five-card suit. That’s Our transfer bid of 2 shows five or enough to invite slam but not enough more hearts and our subsequent bid 3♣/3♦: 6+ suit; invit.
    [Show full text]
  • Standard American System Notes Noble Shore
    Standard American System Notes Noble Shore Pages Definitions 2 1NT opening 3-10 1H/S openings 11-14 1D/C openings 15-18 Weak openings 19-21 Strong openings 22-23 Overcalls 24-25 Takeout Doubles 26-27 Slam Bidding 28-29 Carding 30 Sample ACBL Convention Cards 31-32 Index of Conventions 33 Author’s Note 34 Definitions A balanced hand contains no singletons or voids and at most one doubleton. Points refer to a total value of a hand, including shape. HCP refers only to a hand’s high-card points. A natural suited bid shows 4+ cards in its suit. A natural notrump bid shows a desire to play in notrump. A non-natural bid is called an artificial bid. A convention is a commonly used artificial bid that has been given a name. Conventions are not part of Standard American, but many are commonly or nearly-universally played. A forcing bid demands a bid from partner if the next opponent passes. A forcing bid is also known as one- round-forcing. A signoff is a bid that strongly requests a pass or correction to another suit shown by the player signing off. Partner normally may not make a bid in any suit not shown by the signing-off player. A signoff usually occurs when the captain of the auction places the final contract. An invitational bid communicates that the partnership should bid a game unless partner has very minimal strength for previous actions. A game-forcing bid means that the partnership cannot play any contract below 3NT.
    [Show full text]
  • Manchester Herald
    16 - MANCHESTER HERALD. Tuesday Aug 26. 1986 KIT ‘N’ CARLYLE ®by Larry Wright MANCHESTER FOCUS SPORTS I HELP WANTED I HELP WANTED Banking Immediate open­ Cabinet Maker 3 to 5 years BUSINESS & ing for full time teller In experience. Must have Cooney becomes T « Cunningham digs Nassiff in ‘A,’ Manchester office, excel­ hand tools. Full time em­ lent benefits, call Mr. ployment and benefits. Fields, at 647-0568. EOE: CLEANINB Call 742-5317, 8:30 to 5:00 a top town lawyer for her suppers Evergreen in ‘B’ Monday thru Friday. CHILOCME SEmnCEB 1 Receptionist wanted for extremely busy medical Day Care - 2 openings tor ... page 3 | ... page 15 ... page 18 office. Medical and com­ C ^ llty Kleen pommer- Dumgs CMctric— Moyftig. \ ■ age 2 and up. In licensed' clal and resWentlol deon- Electrical f^oblgmvr puter experience a defi­ Manchester home. Excel­ nite plus. Full or part Ing services. Free Need o torait or a «n|4t Lawn Care - Career op­ lent program, includn estimatei; reterences.6«r- fUmoif9 specianie in time hours available. portunity with growing dally activities, meals, Residentlot work. Joseph' Please coll Mrs. Brown at lawn company. Ever­ snacks and more: Fart Dumas. Fuliv Lieeneed. 646-0314. green Lawns has open­ time and before and after GAtfEHIfrY/ FrerEsHmates. 64oiaK ings for hard working school care (Bowers moNNi; <Sor4 Security officer part time lawn care specialists. School) welcome. Expe­ BEMOflEUW 5:30pm . Manchester,above aver­ Year round employment rienced profOsslonal with I age wages,retirees wel­ available. Competitive references. 649-2611 Your' netghborhoad come 247-6882. wooes and benefits.
    [Show full text]
  • Bidding and Play Definitions
    Bidding and Play Definitions for BridgeClues2.Com BC Bidding_PlayDefs.doc Contents Page 1. INTRODUCTION 1 2. POINT COUNT 1 2.1 High Card Points (HCP) 1 2.2 Long Suit Distribution Points 1 2.3 Short Suit Distribution Points 1 2.4 Points 1 3. SUIT BIDS 2 3.1 Five Card Majors 2 3.2 Forcing 1NT over a Major by an Unpassed Hand 2 3.3 Convenient Minor Openings 2 3.4 Limit Raises 2 3.5 Preemptive Minor Suit Raises 2 3.6 Preemptive Jumps to Game in Partner’s Major Opening 2 3.7 Opening Four in a Major 2 3.8 Preemptive Three Bids 2 3.9 Weak Jump Overcalls 3 3.10 Weak Jump Responses 3 3.11 Weak Two Bids 3 3.12 Balancing in a Suit 3 3.13 Opening in Third Seat 3 3.14 Opening in Fourth Seat 4 4.0 NOTRUMP BIDS 4 4.1 Bid of 1NT – 15 to 17 HCP's 4 4.2 Bid of 2NT – 20 to 21 HCP's 4 4.3 Opening Bid of 2C with a Rebid of 2NT – 22 to 24 HCP's 4 4.4 Opening Bid of 2C with a Rebid of 3NT – 25 to 27 HCP's 4 4.5 3H or 3S Response to a 1NT Opening Bid 4 4.6 Balancing in Notrump 5 4.7 Stayman 5 4.8 Drop Dead Stayman (Garbage Stayman or Crawling Stayman) 5 4.9 Gerber 5 4.10 Super Gerber 5 4.11 Quantitative 4NT 6 4.12 Jacoby Transfers 6 4.13 Texas Transfers 6 BC Bidding_PlayDefs.doc ii 4.14 Relay in competition 6 4.15 ACOL 3NT 6 4.16 Gambling 3NT 6 5.
    [Show full text]
  • Jacoby Transfers Acoby Transfers Are a Very Popu- Lar Treatment, and with Good Jreason
    Jacoby transfers acoby transfers are a very popu- lar treatment, and with good Jreason. They’re easy to play, and they help describe common types of PLAY BRIDGE PLAY hand patterns in response to a 1NT opening. For the purposes of this article, we will assume that 1NT is strong (15 to 17 high-card points), but Jacoby transfers may be used with other notrump ranges as well. After a 1NT opening, responder may use a Jacoby transfer to de- scribe a hand with a five-card or this table provides a general guide- K Q 6 5 3 5 A J 7 2 Q 9 4. longer major. The method is simple: line: You have 12 points, and after part- ner’s 1NT open- responder bids the suit one rank be- Responder’s HCPs Goal Recommended action ing you want low the actual major suit he holds. 0–7 Partscore only Transfer then Pass to be in game. Opener then accepts this “transfer” 8–9 Invite game Transfer then bid 2NT (with a five- by bidding the next higher suit at card major) or three of the major But which her turn. For example: (with a six-card suit) one? Start by 10 or more Force to game Transfer then bid a new suit transferring to Opener Responder (forcing) or 3NT (with a five-card spades. After (1) 1NT 2 major) or four of the major (with partner accepts, (2) a six-card suit) 2 bid 3. The (1) “I have at least five hearts. Here are some examples: bid of new suit is forcing to game Please bid 2 for now and I’ll tell Partner opens 1NT and you hold after a transfer, and it also shows an you more on my next turn.” Q J 9 7 6 Q 10 2 6 5 4 7 4.
    [Show full text]