DOCSLIB.ORG

The Evolution of Man Scientifically Disproved

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
The Evolution of Man Scientifically Disproved The Evolution of Man Scientifically Disproved in 50 Arguments http://ldolphin.org/wmwilliams.html By REV. WILLIAM A. WILLIAMS, New Jersey, USA Designed (1) as an up-to-date text book, and a companion to all other text books on evolution; and (2) as an antidote to books in libraries teaching evolution, infidelity and atheism; and (3) as an aid to all students, parents, teachers, ministers, lawyers, doctors, and all other hirers of the truth. Second Edition of 20,000 Copies, Corrected and Revised to Date. Copyright, 1928 REPUBLISHED 1928. By REV. WILLIAM A. WILLIAMS, New Jersey, USA Third Printing 2,000 International Press, Dallas, Texas Fourth Printing 2,000 Leroy Jenkins, Tampa, Fla. Fifth Printing 2,000 Josephine Kaye Williams, Waxahachie, Texas. Keep this book in circulation to refute the teaching of evolution. REV. WILLIAM A. WILLIAMS, DD Ex-president of Franklin College, Ohio Author of "Early American Families," etc. JOSEPHINE KAYE WILLIAMS, MD 1000 SYCAMORE WAXAHACHIE, TEXAS (1928) FORWARD "It must not go out of print!" This oft repeated cry has brought such pressure that the Third Edition of Evolution Disproved has been printed so as to contribute to the saving of the faith of thoughtful students in our various schools. In many classrooms evolution is subtly presented as a fact. Nevertheless students are showing great interest in hearing the "other side of the question." A national lecturer after addressing many of our largest colleges and universities says of our youth, "They have grown weary of hearing propaganda in favor of evolution and anti-religion. Now they want to hear the case set forth in favor of Bible Christianity." The teaching of evolution promotes atheism and is a tool in the hands of communistic agitators in some of our great schools. This presents a clarion call to reach young people with the truth before they become irretrievably ensnared. New Hope Ministry and Counseling Center http://newhopeministrycc.org The late author placed Evolution Disproved in all of the large libraries of the world. University graduates in many lands after reading a copy have written t he author letters expressing deep gratitude for restoring their faith in Christ and His Word. One wrote, "I sat down to read your book to ridicule as an atheist. I arose a child of God." I pray that this may be the experience of countless others with the release of this new edition. Josephine L. Kaye, MD (Mrs. W. A. Williams) The Evolution of Man Mathematically Disproved INTRODUCTION Let it be understood, at the outset, that every proved theory of science is to be accepted. Only the most intense prejudice and the maddest folly would lead any one to reject the proved conclusions of science. Moreover, we should examine any new hypothesis with open minds, to see if it has in it anything truthful, helpful or advantageous. It should neither be accepted nor rejected simply because it is new. But if a theory is evidently or probably untrue, or pernicious, or at all harmful, it is to be rejected and condemned. Some facts and objections are herein submitted to the serious seeker after truth, in the hope that a theory so out of harmony with the facts, and so destructive to the faith and the cherished hopes of man, may be completely discarded. As Evolution can not stand the acid test of mathematics it will be repudiated by all. We shall discuss the theory upon its merits, from a scientific standpoint, and will also demand an explanation of all facts concerned, as we have a right to do, even where they are associated with the theological and the spiritual as well as the material. We do not oppose true science but "science falsely so called." We do not ban research, but will not allow the wild vagaries of the imagination to pass as truth. We shall not declare arbitrarily that evolution is untrue; neither will we allow scientists to decide what we shall believe. But we shall appeal to the facts, and evolution must stand or fall by the evidence. "Evolution is not to be accepted until proved." It is not yet proved and never will be. MATHEMATICS THE ACID TEST. Every theory to which mathematics can be applied will be proved or disproved by this acid test. Figures will not lie, and mathematics will not lie even at the demand of liars. Their testimony is as clear as the mind of God. Gravitation is proved a true theory by numerous calculations, some of them the most abstruse. The Copernican theory is proved true, and the Ptolemaic theory false, by mathematical calculations. The calculations, leading to the discovery of Neptune, went far to establish the Copernican theory as well as the law of gravitation, and to disprove the Ptolemaic theory. The evolution theory, especially as applied to man, likewise is disproved by mathematics. The proof is overwhelming and decisive. Thus God makes the noble science of mathematics bear testimony in favor of the true theories and against the false theories. We shall endeavor to marshal some of the mathematical proofs against the false and pernicious theory of evolution. True theories, such as the New Hope Ministry and Counseling Center http://newhopeministrycc.org gravitation and Copernican theories, harmonize with each other as every branch of mathematics harmonizes with every other. If evolution were true, it would harmonize with all other true theories, rather than with so many false theories. THEORIES OF EVOLUTION Evolution in one sense, means growth or development--literally, unrolling or unfolding. It is difficult to give a clear definition that will apply to each of the various theories that are held. Theories differ vastly in the extent of their application, as held by their various advocates, resulting in great confusion of terms: 1. The atheists believe that there is no God. Hence, matter was not created, but was eternal, or came by chance. Only a mere handful of the whole human race have ever yet believed such an untenable doctrine. The existence of a Creator, is doubted or denied by extreme atheistic evolutionists, who would dethrone God, "exalt the monkey, and degrade man." 2. The first of modern scientific men to adopt the theory that all plants and animals, including man, are developed from certain original simple germs, was Lamarck a French naturalist, in 1809. He conceded that God created matter--nothing more. He believed in spontaneous generation, which scientific investigation has utterly disproved. 3. Darwin goes a step further and concedes there may have been a Creator of matter, and of one, or at most, a few germs, from which all vegetation and all animals came by evolution--all orders, classes, families, genera, species, and varieties. He differs from Lamarck, by allowing the creation of one germ, possibly a few more. He says in his "Origin of Species," "I believe that animals are descended from at most only four or five progenitors; and plants from an equal or lesser number . Analogy would lead me one step further, namely, to the belief that all animals and plants are descended from one prototype...All the organic beings, which have ever lived on the earth, may be descended from some one primordial form." Darwin, because of his great scholarship, fairness, and candor, won for his theory more favor than it inherently deserves. Darwin taught that, "The lower impulses of vegetable life pass, by insensible gradations, into the instinct of animals and the higher intelligence of man," without purpose or design. None of these three hypotheses can admit the creation of man. 4. Other evolutionists, believing in the evolution of both plants and animals, nevertheless refuse to believe in the evolution of man--the most baneful application of the whole theory. Even if there were convincing proof of the evolution of plants and animals from one germ, there is no real proof of the evolution of man. To prove this is the chief purpose of this book. 5. A fifth theory of evolution is held by many. It is called polyphyletic evolution, which means that God created numerous stocks, or beginnings of both plant and animal life, which were subject to change and growth, deterioration and development, according to his plan and purpose. So much of evolution in this sense as can be proved, is in harmony with the Bible account of the creation of plants, animals and man. The false theory of evolution is called the monophyletic, which teaches that all species of plants and animals including man, developed from one cell or germ which came by creation or spontaneous generation. Evolution is used throughout this book in this latter sense, unless otherwise indicated by the context. God does not create by evolution, for it can only develop what already exists. New Hope Ministry and Counseling Center http://newhopeministrycc.org This book is divided into three parts: In Part One, material evolution, especially the evolution of the human body, is disproved. In Part Two, the alleged proofs of evolution are examined and refuted. In Part Three, the evolution of the soul is shown to be impossible. There are in all fifty numbered arguments, including answers to the arguments of evolutionists. PART ONE THE EVOLUTION OF THE HUMAN BODY MATHEMATICALLY DISPROVED Any scientific theory or hypothesis must be proved first possible, then probable, then certain. To be a possible theory, it must be reconcilable with many facts; to be a probable theory, it must be reconcilable with many more; to be a certain and proven theory, it must be reconcilable with all the facts. Whenever it is irreconcilable with any fact, it should be rejected, as it can not be a true theory.
Load more

Recommended publications
  • The Tarzan Series of Edgar Rice Burroughs
    I The Tarzan Series of Edgar Rice Burroughs: Lost Races and Racism in American Popular Culture James R. Nesteby Submitted to the Graduate College of Bowling Green State University in partial fulfillment of the requirements for the degree in Doctor of Philosophy August 1978 Approved: © 1978 JAMES RONALD NESTEBY ALL RIGHTS RESERVED ¡ ¡ in Abstract The Tarzan series of Edgar Rice Burroughs (1875-1950), beginning with the All-Story serialization in 1912 of Tarzan of the Apes (1914 book), reveals deepseated racism in the popular imagination of early twentieth-century American culture. The fictional fantasies of lost races like that ruled by La of Opar (or Atlantis) are interwoven with the realities of racism, particularly toward Afro-Americans and black Africans. In analyzing popular culture, Stith Thompson's Motif-Index of Folk-Literature (1932) and John G. Cawelti's Adventure, Mystery, and Romance (1976) are utilized for their indexing and formula concepts. The groundwork for examining explanations of American culture which occur in Burroughs' science fantasies about Tarzan is provided by Ray R. Browne, publisher of The Journal of Popular Culture and The Journal of American Culture, and by Gene Wise, author of American Historical Explanations (1973). The lost race tradition and its relationship to racism in American popular fiction is explored through the inner earth motif popularized by John Cleves Symmes' Symzonla: A Voyage of Discovery (1820) and Edgar Allan Poe's The narrative of A. Gordon Pym (1838); Burroughs frequently uses the motif in his perennially popular romances of adventure which have made Tarzan of the Apes (Lord Greystoke) an ubiquitous feature of American culture.
    [Show full text]
  • Anthropology
    CALIFOR!:HA STATE UNIVERSI'fY, NO:R'l'HRIDGE 'l'HE EVOLUTIONARY SCHENES 0!.'' NEANDER.THAL A thesis su~nitted in partial satisfaction of tl:e requirements for the degree of Naste.r of A.rts Anthropology by Sharon Stacey Klein The Thesis of Sharon Stacey Klein is approved: Dr·,~ Nike West. - Dr. Bruce Gelvin, Chair California s·tate University, Northridge ii ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS ·There are many people I would like to thank. Firs·t, the members of my corr.mi ttee who gave me their guidance and suggestions. Second, rny family and friends who supported me through this endea7cr and listened to my constant complaining. Third, the people in my office who allowed me to use my time to complete ·this project. Specifically, I appreciate the proof-reading done by my mother and the French translations done by Mary Riedel. ii.i TABLE OF' CONTENTS PAGE PRELIMINA:H.Y MATEIUALS : Al")stra-:-:t vi CHAP'I'ERS: I. Introduction 1 II. Methodology and Materials 4 III. Classification of Neanderthals 11 Species versus Subspecies Definitions of Neanderthals 16 V. The Pre-sapiens Hypothesis .i9 VI. The Unilinear Hypothesis 26 Horphological Evidence Transi tiona.l Sp.. ::;:cimens T'ool Complexes VII. The Pre-Neanderthal Hypothesis 58 Morphological Evidence Spectrum Hypothesis "Classic'1 Neanderthal's Adaptations Transitional Evidence Tool Complexes VIII. Sumnary and Conclusion 90 Heferences Cited 100 1. G~<ological and A.rchaeoloqical 5 Subdivisions of the P1eistoce!1e 2. The Polyphyletic Hypothesis 17 3. The Pre-sapiens Hypothesis 20 4. The UnilinPar Hypothesis 27 iv FIGUHES: P.Z\GE 5. Size Comparisons of Neanderthal 34 and Australian Aborigine Teeth 6.
    [Show full text]
  • Ecstatic Encounters Ecstatic Encounters
    encounters ecstatic encounters ecstatic ecstatic encounters Bahian Candomblé and the Quest for the Really Real Mattijs van de Port AMSTERDAM UNIVERSITY PRESS Ecstatic Encounters Bahian Candomblé and the Quest for the Really Real Mattijs van de Port AMSTERDAM UNIVERSITY PRESS Layout: Maedium, Utrecht ISBN 978 90 8964 298 1 e-ISBN 978 90 4851 396 3 NUR 761 © Mattijs van de Port / Amsterdam University Press, Amsterdam 2011 All rights reserved. Without limiting the rights under copyright reserved above, no part of this book may be reproduced, stored in or introduced into a retrieval system, or transmitted, in any form or by any means (electronic, mechanical, photocopying, recording or otherwise) without the written permission of both the copyright owner and the author of the book. Contents PREFACE / 7 INTRODUCTION: Avenida Oceânica / 11 Candomblé, mystery and the-rest-of-what-is in processes of world-making 1 On Immersion / 47 Academics and the seductions of a baroque society 2 Mysteries are Invisible / 69 Understanding images in the Bahia of Dr Raimundo Nina Rodrigues 3 Re-encoding the Primitive / 99 Surrealist appreciations of Candomblé in a violence-ridden world 4 Abstracting Candomblé / 127 Defining the ‘public’ and the ‘particular’ dimensions of a spirit possession cult 5 Allegorical Worlds / 159 Baroque aesthetics and the notion of an ‘absent truth’ 6 Bafflement Politics / 183 Possessions, apparitions and the really real of Candomblé’s miracle productions 5 7 The Permeable Boundary / 215 Media imaginaries in Candomblé’s public performance of authenticity CONCLUSIONS Cracks in the Wall / 249 Invocations of the-rest-of-what-is in the anthropological study of world-making NOTES / 263 BIBLIOGRAPHY / 273 INDEX / 295 ECSTATIC ENCOUNTERS · 6 Preface Oh! Bahia da magia, dos feitiços e da fé.
    [Show full text]
  • The Brain from Ape To
    BOOK REVIEW The Brain fr om Ape to Man , a Cont ribut ion differentiation in its central nervous system, is to the Study of the Evo lut ion and Dev el op - more like man than any of the other Simians. men t of the Human Brai n . By Frederick Tilney, The actual interrelationship between man and ph .d ., m.d . With Chapters on the Reconstruction the great apes seems more likely to be based of the Gray Matter in the Primate Brain Stem, by upon derivation from some common or gen- Henry AIsop Riley, a .m., m.d . Foreword by Henry eralized stock which held in it the potentiality Fairfield Osborn, sc .d ., ll .d . Two volumes, New York, Paul B. Hoeber, Inc., 1928. to specialize along the anthropoid line in one direction, and through certain subhuman stages This is not a suitable medium in which to to man in another. Thus man, modern or pale- review the scientific study of the anatomy and olithic, cannot trace a direct line of descent to physiology of the brain which forms the bulk one or the other of the living anthropoid apes. of the two large volumes of Dr. Tilney’s great Of the genera of the Simiidae, the orang-outang work. Suffice it to say that the microscopic is placed by Tilney lowest in the scale, the and gross structures of the brain are studied chimpanzee next above, and the gorilla next to in the most minute detail and illustrated in the man, basing his opinion chiefly on the morpho- large number of accurate and artistic plates logical consideration of the brain structure.
    [Show full text]
  • Human Origin Sites and the World Heritage Convention in Eurasia
    World Heritage papers41 HEADWORLD HERITAGES 4 Human Origin Sites and the World Heritage Convention in Eurasia VOLUME I In support of UNESCO’s 70th Anniversary Celebrations United Nations [ Cultural Organization Human Origin Sites and the World Heritage Convention in Eurasia Nuria Sanz, Editor General Coordinator of HEADS Programme on Human Evolution HEADS 4 VOLUME I Published in 2015 by the United Nations Educational, Scientific and Cultural Organization, 7, place de Fontenoy, 75352 Paris 07 SP, France and the UNESCO Office in Mexico, Presidente Masaryk 526, Polanco, Miguel Hidalgo, 11550 Ciudad de Mexico, D.F., Mexico. © UNESCO 2015 ISBN 978-92-3-100107-9 This publication is available in Open Access under the Attribution-ShareAlike 3.0 IGO (CC-BY-SA 3.0 IGO) license (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-sa/3.0/igo/). By using the content of this publication, the users accept to be bound by the terms of use of the UNESCO Open Access Repository (http://www.unesco.org/open-access/terms-use-ccbysa-en). The designations employed and the presentation of material throughout this publication do not imply the expression of any opinion whatsoever on the part of UNESCO concerning the legal status of any country, territory, city or area or of its authorities, or concerning the delimitation of its frontiers or boundaries. The ideas and opinions expressed in this publication are those of the authors; they are not necessarily those of UNESCO and do not commit the Organization. Cover Photos: Top: Hohle Fels excavation. © Harry Vetter bottom (from left to right): Petroglyphs from Sikachi-Alyan rock art site.
    [Show full text]
  • Ed 130 937 Author Title Institution Pub Date
    DOCUMENT RESUME ED 130 937 SO 009 511 AUTHOR Chilcott, John H., Ed. TITLE Council on Anthropology and Education Quarterly, Vol. VII, No. 3, August 1976. Special Issue: Research Dimensions of Anthropology and Education. INSTITUTION Council on Anthropology and Education, Washington, D.C. PUB DATE Aug 76 NOTE 53p.; For related documents, see SO 009 509 and 510 AVAILABLE FROMCouncil on Anthropology and Education, 1703 New Hampshire Avenua NW, Washington, D.C. 20009 ($1.00) EDRS PRICE MF-$0.83 HC-$3.50 Plus Postage. DESCRIPTORS *Anthropology; Cultural Factors; *Educational Anthropology; Educational Policy; Educational Research; Elementary Secondary Education; Ethnology; Evaluation Methods; Evaluation Needs; *Financial Support; Government Role; Higher Education; Prediction; Relevance (Education) ;*Research Methodology; *Research Opportunities; Research Skills; School Role; Social Science Research ABSTRACT The collection of papers focuses on the future of research in anthropology and education. Intended as an exploration of the relationship between funding agencies and the individual anthropological researcher, the articles generally question the degree of control which the anthropologist can exert on research. The basic premise of the papers is that anthropology possesses a methodology and a conceptual framework which can contribute to a better understanding of the cultural process of education within a society. The first two papers explore the political considerations of research by investigating federal-agency programs and by measuring the involvement of anthropologists in federally contracted evaluation. The third paper discusses the relationship between educational policy and anthropological fieldwork and concludes that policy makers might be more receptive to research if it is related directly to the premises of a particular policy.
    [Show full text]
  • An Annotated Select Bibliography of the Piltdown Forgery
    An annotated select bibliography of the Piltdown forgery Informatics Programme Open Report OR/13/047 BRITISH GEOLOGICAL SURVEY INFORMATICS PROGRAMME OPEN REPORT OR/13/47 An annotated select bibliography of the Piltdown forgery Compiled by David G. Bate Keywords Bibliography; Piltdown Man; Eoanthropus dawsoni; Sussex. Map Sheet 319, 1:50 000 scale, Lewes Front cover Hypothetical construction of the head of Piltdown Man, Illustrated London News, 28 December 1912. Bibliographical reference BATE, D. G. 2014. An annotated select bibliography of the Piltdown forgery. British Geological Survey Open Report, OR/13/47, iv,129 pp. Copyright in materials derived from the British Geological Survey’s work is owned by the Natural Environment Research Council (NERC) and/or the authority that commissioned the work. You may not copy or adapt this publication without first obtaining permission. Contact the BGS Intellectual Property Rights Section, British Geological Survey, Keyworth, e-mail [email protected]. You may quote extracts of a reasonable length without prior permission, provided a full acknowledgement is given of the source of the extract. © NERC 2014. All rights reserved Keyworth, Nottingham British Geological Survey 2014 BRITISH GEOLOGICAL SURVEY The full range of our publications is available from BGS shops at British Geological Survey offices Nottingham, Edinburgh, London and Cardiff (Welsh publications only) see contact details below or shop online at www. geologyshop.com BGS Central Enquiries Desk Tel 0115 936 3143 Fax 0115 936 3276 The London Information Office also maintains a reference collection of BGS publications, including maps, for consultation. email [email protected] We publish an annual catalogue of our maps and other publications; this catalogue is available online or from any of the Environmental Science Centre, Keyworth, Nottingham BGS shops.
    [Show full text]
  • American Conceptions of Academic Freedom in the Twentieth Century
    This dissertation has been microfilmed exactly as received 67-16,303 LUCAS, Christopher John, 1940- AMEBICAN CONCEPTIONS OF ACADEMIC FREEDOM IN THE TWENTIETH CENTURY. The Ohio State University, Ph.D,, 1967 Education, history University Microfilms, Inc., Ann Arbor, Michigan AMERICAN CONCEPTIONS OF ACADEMIC FREEDOM IN THE TWENTIETH CENTURY DISSERTATION Presented in Partial Fulfillment of the Requirements for the Degree Doctor of Philosophy in the.Graduate School of The Ohio State University By Christopher John Lucas, A. B., M.A.T, ***** The Ohio State University 1967 Approved by mmnA // Adviser School of Education ACKNOWLEDGMENTS I am indebted to Professor Robert B. Sutton for his counsel and assistance in the preparation of this study. His incisive interroga­ tions of my lines of thought were most helpful throughout. His facility for conferring a measure of coherence and concision upon my materials eliminated needless obscurity at many points. Dr. Sutton's inde­ fatigable questioning contributed significantly to whatever merit this writing may possess; of course whatever defects remain are not his responsibility. I should also like to express my gratitude to the staff of The Ohio State University Libraries for their interest and cooperation in locating sources that otherwise would not have been available to me. My thanks are due also to Professors Everett J. Kircher and Bernard Me hi who were kind enough to serve on the reading and examining committees for this dissertation. Their teaching and easy camradery have been an inspiration to me and worthy of emulation in years to come. I gratefully acknowledge the clerical assistance of Mrs. Louise F.
    [Show full text]
  • The Boldest Hoax 1 Have Students Research the Time Line of Humans
    Original broadcast: January 11, 2005 BEFORE WATCHING The Boldest Hoax 1 Have students research the time line of humans. Ask some students to research where Piltdown man was supposed to fit in. (Before the PROGRAM OVERVIEW hoax was revealed, Piltdown Man NOVA investigates the Piltdown hoax, the people was believed to have lived near the end of the Tertiary period during the who may have been involved, and the potential upper Pliocene epoch, more than reasons for the forgery. 1.25 million years ago.) Draw a time line on the board and have students The program: present their findings. • reviews Charles Darwin’s 1859 theory of evolution that drove the hunt 2 As students watch, have them to find the “missing link” in human development—fossil evidence for collect information for the “Great a species that would bridge the evolutionary gap between apes and Piltdown Forgery” activity on page 2. humans. • notes that while Germany, Spain, and France all had evidence of early man, Britain had none. AFTER WATCHING • relates how the skull and jawbone found at Piltdown, England, 1 Discuss the forgery with students. in 1912 were purported to belong to the earliest human ever discovered. Who in the program had the means, • states the early suspicions of some scientists who questioned the motive, and opportunity to carry out authenticity of the artifacts. the forgery? What knowledge and • reports subsequent finds that supported the legitimacy of the Piltdown techniques were necessary to pull it off? Would students consider the man: a canine tooth discovered in 1913 at the original site and a second Piltdown forgery a hoax, a crime, skull and tooth unearthed two years later just a few miles away.
    [Show full text]
  • SOME QUERIES ABOUT EVOLUTION an Open Letter to Professor Vernon Kellogg
    .Q..' SOME QUERIES ABOUT EVOLUTION An Open Letter to Professor Vernon Kellogg. GEORGE HANSON Dear Sir:- I venture to send you a letter in criticism of some features of your book on "Evolution", and I hope you will not count my approach to you an intrusion, or my comments on your work the coloured judgments of the partizan. I am not a mere fault-finder,. nor do I write in any censorious spirit. I am, however, becoming more and more dissatisfied with the arguments usually urged in favour of monophyletic evolution. This does not mean that I am opposed to the doctrine in itself, for I recognize the grandeur of so comprehensive a theory, and I am disposed to believe in polyphyletic evolution; but I see so many difficulties in t,he way of accepting the dogma as you present it, and the hitherto orthodox explanations have been proved so inadequate, where they have not been wholly discarded, that I am honestly staggered and cannot find any rational basis for my scientific faith. I procured your book with considerable expectations, for I knew your ability, and I felt sure I could rely on your candour and courage, no less than on your competence, in dealing with so vast, complex, and thorny a subject. Frankly, I am disappointed with your contribution to present­ day controversy. You appear to me to be too much of a special pleader, a lawyer with a brief, rather than a lover of truth and of nothing but truth.. You do not present and discuss, with any thoroughness, the objections commonly urged.
    [Show full text]
  • The Elimination of Piltdown Man*
    THE ELIMINATION OF PILTDOWN MAN* BY HANBURY HAZELL, L.D.S., R.C.S. Dental Surgeon, Southmead Hospital, Bristol his From It is only in recent years that man has become inquisitive about origin. our which early times man was considered unique among all living things on earth, in its turn was considered the centre of the universe. With the advance of knowledge, was the disillusionment followed; for by the discovery that the sun and not the earth centre of the universe, Copernicus dealt the first blow to man's egocentricity. Who a and even a knows but that visits by spaceships to other planets may inflict greater more resounding shock? In the middle of the eighteenth century, Linnaeus divided living things?plants and each two Latin animals?into groups according to their characteristics and gave this names so that people of different languages had a common tongue in the field of particular research. In addition to inventing the binary nomenclature Linnaeus claimed that man did not live in splendid isolation, but was a member of the Primate family! Here was "the unkindest cut of all" to the self-esteem of man, but Linnaeus lessened the insult by classifying man as Homo sapiens thus displaying an unconscious humour or an incurable optimism. 100 Darwin Exactly years ago, the mutability of species was presented by Charles in his famous book "The Origin of Species through Natural Selection". About the same time, remains of the Neanderthal Man were discovered in a cave near Dussel- dorf. These remains were thought to be of an ancestor of modern man.
    [Show full text]
  • The Mind of Primitive
    THE MIND OF PRIMITIVE MAN THE MACMILLAN COMPANY NEW YORK - BOSTON CHICAGO DALLAS ATLANTA - SAN FRANCISCO MACMILLAN AND CO., LIMITED LONDON BOMBAY CALCUTTA MADRAS MELBOURNE THE MACMILLAN COMPANY OF CANADA, LIMITED TORONTO THE MIND of PRIMITIVE MAN FRANZ BOAS REVISED EDITION THE MACMILLAN COMPANY REVISED EDITION COPYRIGHTED, 1938, BY THE MACMILLAN COMPANY. All rights reserved no part of this book may be re- produced in any form without permission in writing from the publisher, except by a reviewer who wishes to quote brief passages in connection with a review written for inclusion in magazine or newspaper. Printed in the United States of America. Set up and electrotyped. Published March, 1938. Fourth Printing October, 1944. First edition copyrighted and published, 1911, by The Macmillan Company. Copyright renewed 1930 by Franz Boas. PREFACE Since 1911, when the first edition of The Mind of Primi- tive Man was published much work has been done in all the branches of science that have to be considered in the problem with which the book deals. The study of heredity has made important strides and has helped to clear up the concept of race. The influence of environment upon bodily form and behavior has been the subject of many " investigations and the mental attitudes of primitive" man have been studied from new points of view. For this reason a large part of the book had to be rewritten and rearranged. The first statement of some of the conclusions reached in the book were made in an address delivered by the author as vice-president of the Section of Anthropology of the American Association for the Advancement of Science, in 1895.
    [Show full text]