DOCSLIB.ORG

Rotherham LDF Additional Sites

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Rotherham LDF Additional Sites Rotherham Local Plan Development Sites Assessment Rotherham LDF Additional Sites Reference: LDF0523 Development Type: Housing Site Name Land at the junction of Gildingwells Road and Worksop Road Source Own Investigation Area (Ha) 0.2 UDP Allocation Community Facilities Easting 455257 Proposed Allocation Residential Northing 383776 Town Woodsetts Dwellings 10.0 Address Gildingwells Road 11 October 2013 Page 1 of 3 Rotherham Local Plan Development Sites Assessment Rotherham LDF Additional Sites Reference: LDF0523 Development Type: Housing Site Assessment Subdiv Archaeological Perimeter Area Recommendation Significance (m) (Ha) ALL Local - Low significance 234 0.25 Little or no archaeological objections to future allocation There is one designated heritage asset within the study area, the Grade II Listed Woodsetts House. The SMR records two undesignated assets within the study area, a building of a possible 18th to 19th century date and the post-medieval church of St George's located 40m southwest of the site. The site was not included in the Magnesian Limestone in South and West Yorkshire AP Mapping project, so no information is available on any cropmark features in or adjoining the site. The HEC records the present character of the site as being split between Residential: Vernacular Cottages 1800-2006 and Residential: Private Housing Estate 1967-2006 with a significant historic character of Vernacular Cottages 1066-1799 and fragmentary historic character of Enclosed Land: Open Fields 1066-1539 and Enclosed Land: Strip Fields 1540-1966. The site is split between the Nucleated Rural Settlements and Early to Mid- 20th Century Private Suburbs character zones. Comparison of historic OS maps indicates the site occupied a series of enclosed fields with a school building and additional structure to the south of the school just within the western edge on the 1854 map. By the 1930s map the school building has been extended, taking up most of the northwest corner of the site, while the eastern section of the site is still occupied by two fields. The school appears to have been extended again in the 1970s, with the structure to the south no longer depicted. The modern OS map indicates the site has been cleared of the school and the building in the southwest corner. Post-1990 APs show the site as scrubland, with a small park/playground constructed within the southern half of the site in the late 2000s. Known and Potential Heritage Assets There is a moderate possibility for disturbing remains of medieval and post-medieval date of high local significance. There is also a high possibility of disturbing 19th century remains of low-local significance and 20th century remains relating to additions to the school of negligible significance. Survival The survival of pre-19th century remains is considered to be low due 19th and 20th century disturbance. The survival of 19th century heritage assets relating to the school is considered to be moderate to poor as the 20th century additions to the school, together with the creation of the park/playground, may have impacted earlier remains. Heritage Assets and Activities RecordType National Heritage List for England RecordID Name Details Distance Criteria 1193141 WOODSETTS HOUSE Listed Building (Grade II) Within 250m buffer RecordType SMR Monument RecordID Name Details Distance Criteria 03873/01 St George's Church, Woodsetts CHURCH (Post Medieval to Industrial - 1720 AD to Within 250m buffer 1914 AD) 04244/06 Manor Farm Outbuilding, BUILDING (Post Medieval to Industrial - 1540 AD Within 250m buffer Woodsetts to 1914 AD) RecordType SMR Historic Environment Characterisation RecordID Name Details Distance Criteria HSY4073 Woodsetts 20th century Residential; Private Housing Estate ; Modern - Within site suburban spread, Woodsetts, 1967 AD? to 2006 AD? Rotherham HSY4076 Historic Core, Woodsetts, Residential; Vernacular Cottages ; Industrial to Within site Rotherham Modern - 1800 AD? to 2006 AD? 11 October 2013 Page 2 of 3 Rotherham Local Plan Development Sites Assessment Rotherham LDF Additional Sites Reference: LDF0523 Development Type: Housing Heritage Assets and Activities RecordType SMR Historic Environment Characterisation RecordID Name Details Distance Criteria HSY3266 Land north of Woodsetts, Enclosed Land; Agglomerated fields ; Modern - Within 250m buffer Rotherham 1974 AD? to 2005 AD HSY4074 Dinnington Road, Woodsetts, Residential; Private Housing Estate ; Modern - Within 250m buffer Rotherham 1999 AD to 2006 AD 11 October 2013 Page 3 of 3 Rotherham Local Plan Development Sites Assessment Rotherham LDF Additional Sites Reference: LDF0533 Development Type: Housing Site Name Land off Winney Hill Source Site Allocation Suggestions Area (Ha) 1.6 UDP Allocation Green Belt Easting 449330 Proposed Allocation Other Northing 380050 Town Harthill Dwellings 39.0 Address Firvale 11 October 2013 Page 1 of 2 Rotherham Local Plan Development Sites Assessment Rotherham LDF Additional Sites Reference: LDF0533 Development Type: Housing Site Assessment Subdiv Archaeological Perimeter Area Recommendation Significance (m) (Ha) ALL Unknown 641 1.61 Uncertain archaeological objections to allocation There are no statutorily designated or undesignated monuments within the study area. The site was not included in the Magnesian Limestone in South and West Yorkshire AP Mapping Project, so no information is available of cropmark features in or adjoining the site. The HEC records the present character of the site as Enclosed Land: Agglomerated fields 1973-2005 with a fragmentary historic character of Enclosed Land: Open Fields 1066-1539 and Enclosed Land: Strip Fields 1540-1972. The site is assigned to the Agglomerated Enclosure character zone. Comparison of historic OS maps indicates the site has changed little since the mid-19th century when it consisted of two fields with a boundary running through the middle on an east-west alignment. An old gravel pit is recorded on the 1st edition OS map to the east of the site. By the 1890s the settlement of Fir Hill has been established to the north of the site, with the construction of terrace housing and a Methodist chapel. Evidence for an increase in quarrying in the surrounding area can be seen with the depiction of further gravel and sand quarries located to the southeast of the site. The northern half of the site is occupied by allotment gardens from the 1920s until the 1970s, with two houses built just outside the site, along its eastern edge, at this time. Post-1990 APs show the site to remain divided into two by a field boundary and that a modern garden extension with garage has been built in the northwest section of the site. Known and Potential Heritage Assets Although there are no known prehistoric, Romano-British or Anglo Saxon remains within the site, such remains are difficult to predict or exclude, especially in areas with no previous ground disturbance. The possibility of disturbing remains relating to these periods is uncertain with the significance being recorded as unknown. There is a high possibility of pre-1854 field boundaries of negligible significance. Survival The survival of heritage assets on this site is considered to be good due to lack of previous ground disturbance. Heritage Assets and Activities RecordType SMR Historic Environment Characterisation RecordID Name Details Distance Criteria HSY3294 Harthill Field, Rotherham Enclosed Land; Agglomerated fields ; Modern - Within site 1973 AD to 2005 AD HSY4034 Fir Vale, Harthill, Rotherham Residential; Private Housing Estate ; Modern - Within site 1985 AD to 2004 AD HSY4037 Mid-twentieth century housing Residential; Planned Estate (Social Housing) ; Within site to the south of Harthill, Modern - 1938 AD? to 2005 AD? Rotherham HSY4040 Doctor Lane, Serlby Drive, Residential; Villas/ Detached Housing ; Modern - Within 250m buffer Harthill, Rotherham 1985 AD to 2004 AD 11 October 2013 Page 2 of 2 Rotherham Local Plan Development Sites Assessment Rotherham LDF Additional Sites Reference: LDF0544 Development Type: Housing Site Name land to north east of Goose Carr Lane Source Green Belt Representation Area (Ha) 2.2 UDP Allocation Green Belt Easting 449161 Proposed Allocation Other Northing 384471 Town Todwick Dwellings 54.0 Address land to north east of Goose Carr Lane 11 October 2013 Page 1 of 3 Rotherham Local Plan Development Sites Assessment Rotherham LDF Additional Sites Reference: LDF0544 Development Type: Housing Site Assessment Subdiv Archaeological Perimeter Area Recommendation Significance (m) (Ha) ALL Unknown 718 2.23 Uncertain archaeological objections to allocation There is one designated heritage asset within the study area, the Grade II Listed early to mid-18th century house at 44 and 46 Kiveton Lane. The SMR records one undesignated asset within the study area consisting of two Roman coins, Antoniniani of Gallierius (A.D. 253-268, Rome mint) found in a field with 'several others' 130m southeast of the site. The site was not included in the Magnesian Limestone in South and West Yorkshire AP Mapping Project, so no information is available of cropmark features in or adjoining the site. The HEC records the present character of the site as Enclosed Land: Agglomerated Fields 1973-2005 with a fragmentary historic character of Enclosed Land: Open Fields 1066-1539 and Enclosed Land: Piecemeal Enclosure 1540-1972. The site is assigned to the Agglomerated Enclosure character zone. Comparison of historic OS maps indicate the site changed little since the mid-19th century when it occupied an enclosed field immediately adjacent to Goose Carr Lane, 250m west of the historic core of Todwick. Todwick begins to expand from the mid-20th century, with housing established to the southeast at this time. By the 1970s the village has expanded considerable to the southeast, with the site taking its current form. Post-1990 APs show the site occupies an arable field. Known and Potential Heritage Assets Although there are no known prehistoric, Romano-British or Anglo Saxon remains within the site, such remains are difficult to predict or exclude, especially in areas with no previous ground disturbance. The possibility of disturbing remains relating to these periods is uncertain with the significance being recorded as unknown.
Load more

Recommended publications
  • Laughton Parish Council Newsletter 113055.Ai
    Laughton-en-le-Morthen Parish Council (Incorporating Brookhouse, Carr, Slade Hooton and Newhall Hamlet) News Update News for the Parishioners of Laughton-en-le-Morthen Parish Issue No. 35 – May 2019 Welcome to our latest news update. This newsletter is produced to keep parishioners informed about the activities being undertaken by the Parish Council for the benefit of the Parish, as well as other information on local events that you may be interested in. We hope that you find it informative. For the first time we are also including an update from Ward Councillors. We always welcome any feedback or new ideas so please get in touch with either me, or Caroline, our Parish Clerk, if there is anything you’d like to raise. Contact details are included on page 2. Parishioners are always very welcome to come along to our Parish Council meetings. Trevor Stanway Parish Council Chairman Annual Parish Meeting St Johns Road The Annual Parish Meeting is at 6.00pm on Wednesday 22nd May in the Village Hall. This meeting is held for Laughton-en-le-Morthen Allotments Open Day Parish electors. It is a statutory meeting of local government electors We are proud that there has been an allotment on St Johns Road since registered in Laughton-en-le-Morthen Parish. It is a public meeting the early 1900s and we are very happy to announce that the site is in where electors can raise questions or put forward any suggestions to the process of being rejuvenated, we now have a new meeting room, the meeting.
    [Show full text]
  • The Peak District Raptor Report 2019
    THE PEAK DISTRICT RAPTOR REPORT 2019 SOUTH PEAK RAPTOR STUDY GROUP (SPRSG) & PEAK DISTRICT RAPTOR MONITORING GROUP (PDRMG) Members of the groups in 2019: SPRSG Co-ordinator: Trevor Grimshaw John Atkin Roy Frost Mick Lacey Kim Leyland Geoff Mawson Ant Messenger** Stephen Moores Steve Samworth** Ken Smith Mick Taylor Paul Thomas Paul Tooley** [** members of both groups] PDRMG Co-ordinator: Steve Davies Carl Ashford Nick Corley Jamie Dunning Tim Entwistle Andy Platts Mike Price Dave Simmonite Paul Stafford Mark Watson Andy Wright Jamie Horner [Peak District BoP Initiative] Front cover and above: Goshawks photographed by Ken Smith, SPRSG area, Derbyshire, Spring 2019 FOREWORD This is the ninth joint annual report from the two Raptor Groups who operate in the Peak District and surrounding areas. It is a comprehensive review of breeding successes and failures, conservation and persecution news affecting birds of prey, owls and Raven and is made possible by the close co-operation of the two groups along with landowners, shooting tenants, gamekeepers and statutory bodies. All fieldworkers operate under the BTO Ringing and Nest Recording schemes and are licensed for Schedule One species as appropriate. Both groups are founding members of the Northern England Raptor Forum (NERF). 2019 was a mixed year overall but it is pleasing to report a continuation of the improvement in the situation for breeding raptors in the Dark Peak which was beginning to become apparent in 2018. Especially noteworthy is the excellent improvements of successful breeding on the National Trust estates and adjacent bordering forestry recently. A combination of the work that the RSPB have done in the area, the introduction of the National Trust Moorland Vision and the National Trust stance over illegal persecution and the efforts of their shooting tenants have all played a major role in contributing to what we hope will be a sustained improvement, both in terms of overall numbers but also productivity, of the larger raptor species.
    [Show full text]
  • Door 2 Door Services in Rotherham the Local Service That Comes to You…
    Door 2 Door Services in Rotherham the local service that comes to you… July 2013 Traveline 01709 51 51 51 travelsouthyorkshire.com/door2door Contents The service The service ..................................................3 No matter what age you are, if you find it How do I register? ........................................5 difficult to use standard public transport then you can apply to use a Door 2 Door service Booking ......................................................6 instead. Operating times and fares ...........................12 Each service will pick you up from your home Shopper Bus timetable ...............................13 and can take you around your local area and Contact details ..........................................22 beyond. Accessibility ..............................................23 Door 2 Door is great for meeting new people, making new friends and being able to visit places you couldn’t get to before. “Door 2 Door services are vital for many who For example, if you want to travel to the town would otherwise be housebound. South centre or a local supermarket, Shopper Bus is Yorkshire Integrated Transport Authority is the best service for you. It offers transport from proud to support Door 2 Door as a key part of your home at certain times and on set our transport network.” days. Please see the timetable on page 13 in this leaflet for details of journeys from where Cllr Jameson - Chair of the South Yorkshire you live. Integrated Transport Authority If you need to travel at a particular time, and to a destination not available on Shopper Bus (for example, if you are visiting a friend in hospital, or travelling to an evening class) then our Dial-a- Ride service will suit your needs better.
    [Show full text]
  • Highway Asset Management Plan 2015-2022
    ROTHERHAM METROPOLITAN BOROUGH COUNCIL Regeneration & Environment Services Community Safety and Street Scene HIGHWAY ASSET MANAGEMENT PLAN 2015-2022 Last Reviewed August 2020 Rotherham MBC - Highway Asset Management Plan 2015 – 22 CONTENTS Page 1 About Rotherham 3 2 Introduction 4-6 3 Implementing Asset Management 7-10 4 Levels Of Service 10-14 5 Communication, Monitoring And Performance 15-21 6 Asset Inventory And Lifecycle Planning – Highway Network 22-32 7 Asset Inventory And Lifecycle Planning – Drainage 32-39 8 Asset Inventory And Lifecycle Planning – Street Lighting 39-43 9 Asset Inventory And Lifecycle Planning – Structures 44-46 10 Asset Inventory And Lifecycle Planning – Traffic Systems 47-55 11 Works - Decision Making Process 55-59 12 Risk Management 60-61 13 Funding 62-66 14 Forward Programmes 66-67 15 Highway Asset Improvement Action Plan 67 16 Glossary Of Terms 68-69 17 Tables And Charts 69-70 18 Acknowledgements 70 19 Supporting Documents 70 20 Appendices 71-80 21 Highway Asset Management Improvement Plan 2015-22 82-84 Reviewed August 2020 by R. Jackson Page 2 of 84 Rotherham MBC - Highway Asset Management Plan 2015 – 22 1 ABOUT ROTHERHAM Rotherham is a town in South Yorkshire, England, which together with its conurbation and outlying settlements to the north, south and south-east form the Metropolitan Borough of Rotherham, with a recorded population of 63,375 in accordance with the office for national statistics 2017. Historically in the West Riding of Yorkshire, its central area is on the banks of the River Don below its confluence with the River Rother on the road between Sheffield and Doncaster.
    [Show full text]
  • Rotherham Character Zone Descriptions
    South Yorkshire Historic Environment Characterisation Project Part III: Rotherham Character Zone Descriptions Rotherham Character Zone Descriptions 399 South Yorkshire Historic Environment Characterisation Project Part III: Rotherham Character Zone Descriptions 400 South Yorkshire Historic Environment Characterisation Project Part III: Rotherham Character Zone Descriptions Assarted Enclosure Summary of Dominant Character This zone, limited to the north-western-most corner of the borough, is made up of ancient woodlands and ancient irregular enclosure patterns whose key characteristics are small, sinuous or rounded fields with mainly hedged boundaries. Very little of the land was formerly part of a medieval open field system (see ‘Strip Enclosure and ‘Agglomerated Enclosure’ zones) with the majority of records of enclosed land in this area being recorded by the project as originating from the irregular piecemeal enclosure of land. This pattern of land enclosure is characterised by field boundaries exhibiting no overall level of planned organisation. Such irregular patterns of enclosure originate when an area of land is subdivided over many years by many separate actions of enclosure. Common medieval processes that are known to have resulted in irregular piecemeal enclosure patterns include the clearance or assartment of heavily wooded landscapes, moorlands and wetlands (Taylor 1975, 94-105), and the gradual subdivision of former deer parks, for sale or lease. The zone is situated across a section of the Middle Coal Measures whose alternating bands of shales, sandstone and coal seams have weathered to produce a rolling hilly landscape with steeper scarps on western hillsides. Areas of woodland have often survived on these steeper slopes. Character areas within this zone typically occupy a parish edge location, indicating that their original clearance may have been the result of a separate process than that which established the open field systems closer to the nucleated settlements at the parish centre.
    [Show full text]
  • Rotherham LDF Additional Sites
    Rotherham Local Plan Development Sites Assessment Rotherham LDF Additional Sites Reference: LDF0327 Development Type: Employment Site Name Land off Cumwell Lane Source Site Allocation Suggestions Area (Ha) 9.1 UDP Allocation Green Belt Easting 449860 Proposed Allocation Other Northing 391657 Town Rotherham Employment 9.1 Address 16 October 2013 Page 1 of 4 Rotherham Local Plan Development Sites Assessment Rotherham LDF Additional Sites Reference: LDF0327 Development Type: Employment Site Assessment Subdiv Archaeological Perimeter Area Recommendation Significance (m) (Ha) ALL Local - High significance 1215 9.1 Potential archaeological objections to allocation There are no designated heritage assets within the site or study area. The SMR records one monument within the site relating to a series of possible Iron Age or Romano-British field boundaries. Within the study area the SMR records one monument relating to field systems and associated enclosures with some anomalies identified as potential kiln sites from geophysical survey. The SMR records further potential Iron Age and Romano- British remains within 500m of the site including an irregular shaped enclosure of possible Iron Age or Roman date, a prehistoric or Romano-British field system, an Iron Age or Romano-British enclosure and field system and lime kiln of probable Romano-British date all located to the east, west and south of the site. The SMR records four archaeological investigations within the study area. A geophysical survey followed by targeted trial-trenching at Sandy Lane revealed seven late medieval lime kilns dated by archaeomagnetism to the late 15th-16th century and a possible contemporary field system. Geophysical survey undertaken south of Morrisons revealed one large ditch and tentative medieval boundary ditches, while further geophysical survey undertaken at Bawtry Road indicating the presence of a number of linear archaeological features.
    [Show full text]
  • Annual Review 2017
    Northern England Raptor Forum Annual Review 2017 1 Contents Acknowledgements Inside front cover Photograph credits 3 Useful telephone numbers 3 Foreword 4 Chairman‟s Report 5 Secretary‟s Report 9 Geographical coverage 10 NERF 2017 Annual Review 13 Species monitoring 14 Persecution 15 Black Hole species 16 Summary 16 Combined statistics 17 Species Reports Editor‟s Note 18 Buzzard, Common Buteo buteo 52 Goshawk, Northern Accipiter gentilis 29 Harrier, Hen Circus cyaneus 39 Harrier, Marsh Circus aeruginosus 33 Hobby Falco subbuteo 88 Honey-buzzard Pernis apivorus 23 Kestrel, Common Falco tinnunculus 79 Kite, Red Milvus milvus 45 Merlin Falco columbarius 83 Osprey Pandion haliaetus 19 Owl, Barn Tyto alba 56 Owl, Eurasian Eagle Bubo bubo 76 Owl, Little Athene noctua 65 Owl, Long-eared Asio otus 68 Owl, Short-eared Asio flammeus 71 Owl, Tawny Strix aluco 61 Peregrine Falco peregrinus 93 Raven, Common Corvus corax 99 Sparrowhawk, Eurasian Accipiter nisus 26 Rarer species monitored by NERF in 2017 105 Appendices 1. Combined NERF monitoring data 109 2. Combined productivity graphs 110 3. Ring recoveries 112 NERF Group contacts Inside back cover 2 Photograph credits Front Cover: Gordon Yates Osprey Gordon Yates Honey Buzzard Andrew Money Golden Eagle Gordon Yates Sparrowhawk Gordon Yates Goshawk Andy Butler Marsh Harrier Gordon Yates Hen Harrier Gordon Yates, Gordon Richardson Pallid Harrier Mike Watson Montagu‟s Harrier Mark Yates Red Kite Ivan Ellison White-tailed Eagle Gordon Yates Rough-legged Buzzard Peter Richman Buzzard Gordon Yates Barn Owl John Dermott Eagle Owl Bill Hesketh Tawny Owl Mike Killelea Little Owl Pat Killelea Long-eared Owl Bob Kenworthy Short-eared Owl David Raw Kestrel Ken Smith Merlin Colin Dilcock Hobby Andy Butler Peregrine Adrian Dancy Raven Gordon Yates Useful telephone numbers If you discover a wildlife crime please report the details to the Police, obtain an incident number and ask that, in addition to sending an Officer to the scene, the report is brought to the attention of the Force Wildlife Crime Officer.
    [Show full text]
  • Rotherham Metropolitan Borough Council Planning Regulatory Board
    ROTHERHAM METROPOLITAN BOROUGH COUNCIL PLANNING BOARD Thursday, 27 September 2007 Start Time:- 9.00 a.m. for Visit Start Time:- 10.05 for Meeting At Town Hall, Moorgate Street, Rotherham AGENDA 1. To determine if the following matters are to be considered under the categories suggested, in accordance with the Local Government Act 1972. 2. To determine any items which the Chairman is of the opinion should be considered as a matter of urgency. 3. Declarations of Interest (Page 1) (A form is attached and spares will be available at the meeting) 4. Minutes of the meeting of the Planning Regulatory Board held on 13th September, 2007 (herewith) (Pages 2 - 18) 5. Deferments/Site Visits (information attached) (Pages 19 - 20) 6. Visit of Inspection (report herewith) (Pages 21 - 34) 7. Development Proposals (report herewith) (Pages 35 - 128) 8. Report of the Director of Planning and Transportation Service (herewith) (Pages 129 - 188) 9. Updates Page 1 Agenda Item 3 ROTHERHAM METROPOLITAN BOROUGH COUNCIL PLANNING REGULATORY BOARD MEMBERS’ DECLARATION OF INTEREST Your Name (Please PRINT): Meeting at which declaration made: Item/Application in which you have an interest: Date of Meeting: Time Meeting Started: Please tick ( / ) which type of interest you have in the appropriate box below: 1. Personal You may stay in the room. 2. Personal/Prejudicial You will usually need to withdraw from the meeting room whilst the item is under discussion. Please give your reason(s) for you Declaring an Interest:- (Please continue overleaf if necessary) N.B. It is up to a Member to determine whether to make a Declaration.
    [Show full text]
  • The Boundary Committee for England Periodic Electoral Review of Rotherham
    THE BOUNDARY COMMITTEE FOR ENGLAND PERIODIC ELECTORAL REVIEW OF ROTHERHAM Draft Recommendations for Ward Boundaries in the Borough of Rotherham February 2003 Sheet 5 of 7 D A O R L IL H E L DA "This map is reproduced from the OS map by The Electoral Commission Sheet 5 UPPERFIELD ROAD with the permission of the Controller of Her Majesty's Stationery Office, © Crown Copyright. MALTBY WEST Unauthorised reproduction infringes Crown Copyright and may lead to prosecution or civil proceedings. PARISH WARD Licence Number: GD03114G" E 1 V I R D 2 L L E W R A Y HELLABY Only Parishes whose Warding has been 3 4 5 WARD D A O R CO altered by these Recommendations have been coloured. LU L MB L U E S W AY W H T I 6 A Junior and R B Infants Schools 7 Playing Fields Cemetery L ILL Y H Maltby Colliery ALL RO AD ILL H Lilly Hall IFF Works CL Junior Mixed School OA Civic K R D Centre Und straight Maltby Hall Infants School LIL AC G R MALTBY Comprehensive School Coronation Park HAWTHORN AVENUE ROTHERHAM ROAD Allotment Gardens Church Ma ltby D ike Church St Mary's RC Primary School M a lt b y D Maltby Crags Church i k e Junior Mixed and Infants School Maltby Far Common MALTBY CP Hooton Levitt Wood Lee Common Football Ground Woolthwaite Cricket Farm Ground Maltby Low Common MALTBY WARD HOOTON LEVITT CP Mill Farm ### MALTBY EAST PARISH WARD P E A K L A N E Rough Park M a l tb y er Torne D Riv i k e North Field Sewage Works Common Hill Beacon Hill Def Sandbeck Park H I G H H O O T O Bullatree Hill Farm N R O A D M a l tb y D i k A Grange Wood e 634 Roche Abbey
    [Show full text]
  • The Boundary Committee for England Periodic Electoral Review of Rotherham
    THE BOUNDARY COMMITTEE FOR ENGLAND PERIODIC ELECTORAL REVIEW OF ROTHERHAM Final Recommendations for Ward Boundaries in the Borough of Rotherham August 2003 Sheet 5 of 7 D A O R Sheet 5 L L "This map is reproduced from the OS map by The Electoral Commission HI E L A with the permission of the Controller of Her Majesty's Stationery Office, © Crown Copyright. MALTBY WESTD PARISH WARD UPPERFIELD ROAD Unauthorised reproduction infringes Crown Copyright and may lead to prosecution or civil proceedings. Licence Number: GD03114G" 1 2 E WICKERSLEY V I R D L L SOUTH E W R A Y WARD Only Parishes whose Warding has been 3 4 5 altered by these Recommendations have been coloured. D A O R CO LU L 6 MB L U E S W 7 AY W H T I A Junior and R B Infants Schools Playing Fields Cemetery L ILL Y H Maltby Colliery ALL RO AD ILL H Lilly Hall IFF Works CL Junior Mixed School OA Civic K R D Centre Und straight Maltby Hall Infants School LIL AC G R MALTBY Comprehensive School Coronation Park HAWTHORN AVENUE ROTHERHAM ROAD Allotment Gardens Church Ma ltby D ike Church St Mary's RC Primary School M a lt b y D Maltby Crags Church i k e Junior Mixed and Infants School Maltby Far Common MALTBY CP Hooton Levitt Wood Lee Common Football Ground Woolthwaite Cricket Farm Ground Maltby Low Common MALTBY WARD HOOTON LEVITT CP MALTBY EAST Mill Farm PARISH WARD P E A K L A N E Rough Park M a l tb y er Torne D Riv i k e North Field Sewage Works Common Hill Beacon Hill Def Sandbeck Park H I G H H O O T O Bullatree Hill Farm N R O A D M a l tb y D i k A Grange Wood e 634 Roche Abbey
    [Show full text]
  • R6 Rotherham
    South Yorkshire Historic Environment Characterisation Project Rotherham Character Zone Descriptions Surveyed Enclosure Areas within this Zone ‘Windmill Hill, Harthill’, ‘Far Field, Wath upon Dearne’, ‘Former Open Fields at Hooton Roberts’, ‘Coal Riding Lane, Dalton Magna’, ‘Braithwell and Ravenfield Commons’, ‘Kingsforth Field Surveyed, Wickersley’, ‘Surveyed Enclosure around Maltby Wood’, ‘Slade Hooton Surveyed Fields and Laughton East Field’, ‘Surveyed Former Open Fields East of Dinnington and North Anston’, ‘Lindrick Common and Fan Field, South Anston’, ‘Woodhall Common, Thorpe Common, Hard Field and Loscar Field’, ‘Laughton Common’, ‘Aston Common’, ‘Todwick Common and Conduit Moor or Common’, ‘Nether Field, Guilthwaite Common and Turnshaw Common, Ulley’, ‘Green Royds Moor, Whiston’, ‘Simon Wood and King's Wood’, ‘Wentworth and Harley Surveyed Enclosures’, ‘Cinder Bridge Field and West Hill Field, Greasborough’, ‘Rawmarsh and Swinton Commons’ Summary of Dominant Character Figure 1: Looking towards the village of Laughton en le Morthen across land enclosed from Laughton Common by Parliamentary Award in 1771. © SYAS 2006 This zone is characterised by land enclosed by straight-sided hedgerows laid out to a regular pattern. Roads within the field pattern are often straight and of a standard width (Hindle 1998) complimenting the overall design of the landscape. Woodland is often characterised by plantations, either 1 South Yorkshire Historic Environment Characterisation Project Rotherham Character Zone Descriptions planned deliberately as part of the surveyed layout or planted later within existing surveyed enclosure boundaries. In this district, however, there is also a significant amount of older ancient woodland, typically occupying steep ground or related to historic common land. Surveyed enclosure mostly dates to the 18 th and 19 th century but there are also some more recently redesigned areas of straight sided enclosure which are included within the zone.
    [Show full text]