Goldilocks Effect (1)

Total Page:16

File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

Goldilocks Effect (1) Student Sheet 1 CRITICAL THINKING ACTIVITY: INTERPRETING THE GOLDILOCKS EFFECT (1) The Goldilocks Effect is derived from a children's story "The Three Bears" in which a little girl named Goldilocks finds a house owned by three bears. Each bear has their own preference of food and beds. After testing all three examples of both items, Goldilocks determines that one of them is always too much in one extreme (too hot or too large), one is too much in the opposite extreme (too cold or too small), and one is "just right". Small planets, including Earth are much more likely to become incubators of life. Astronomers refer to these insignificant little worlds as terrestrial planets because they have heavy-metal cores surrounded by a rocky mantle. Terrestrial planets tend to stick close to their host stars, which means they have smaller orbits and much shorter years. Terrestrial or Earth-like planets are also more likely to lie in the Goldilocks zone. Also called the habitable zone or life zone, the Goldilocks region is an area of space in which a planet is just the right distance from its home star so that its surface is neither too hot nor too cold. Earth, of course, fills that bill, while Venus roasts and Mars exists as a frozen world. In between, the conditions are just right so that liquid water remains on the surface of the planet without freezing or evaporating out into space. Student Sheet 2 The ability to support life of Venus, Earth, and Mars would intrigue Goldilocks, but the actual story of these planets is somewhat more complicated than three bowls of porridge. Four billion years ago leftover water-rich comets and mineral-rich asteroids were still assaulting the planetary surfaces. Some planets had moved inward from where they had formed, others were pushed up to larger orbits and some had unstable orbits and crashed into the Sun or Jupiter. Others were ejected from the solar system altogether. In the end, the few that remained had orbits that were “just right” to survive billions of years. Without greenhouse gases, what would happen to the Earth? It’s interesting to look at Earth’s two closest planets to see what is happening in their atmospheres. Greenhouse gases are invisible molecules in the atmosphere. They let sunlight energy into the atmosphere, but they are able to trap it so it can’t get back out. In the Earth’s atmosphere, there are several important greenhouse gases. Our neighboring planets either have too much greenhouse gases or not enough. Mars and Venus have very similar types of GHGs in their atmospheres, but they are different in the density of gas. Venus has an extremely dense atmosphere, which together with the concentration of CO2 (96.5% of the atmosphere) is responsible for a "runaway" greenhouse effect and a very high surface temperature. Mars has almost no atmosphere; the amount of CO2 (95% of the atmosphere) although similar to that of Venus, is not sufficient to supply a warming effect and the surface temperatures of Mars are very low. Student Sheet 3 Earth settled into an orbit with an average distance of 93 million from the Sun. Almost 70% of Earth's surface is covered by liquid water its average temperature is about 50° F. At normal atmospheric pressures, water freezes at 32 °F and boils at 212 °F, so Earth is in a good position for most of Earth's water to remain in a liquid state. Water moves from the oceans to the atmosphere through evaporation, then to the land through precipitation, and back to the oceans through the flow of rivers and streams. This movement of water is called the hydrologic cycle. It maintains a steady amount of water vapor in the atmosphere. Venus falls right in the center of the Sun's habitable zone. It is covered completely by a thick layer of clouds and has the highest reflectivity of any planet in the solar system. There is no apparent reason why Venus could not have been a comfortable place. But it happens to suffer from a “runaway” greenhouse effect. Scientists believe that on Venus, the intense solar heating kept oceans from forming, or kept them from staying around if they did form. The resulting lack of rainfall and failure of plant life to evolve kept the carbon dioxide in the atmosphere rather than joining it with the rocks as on Earth. Basically, Venus has an environmental disaster for an atmosphere. Venus' thick atmosphere of carbon dioxide traps nearly one hundred percent of the small quantities of radiation that reaches its surface. At 900° F Venus is the hottest planet in the solar system, yet it orbits at nearly twice Mercury's distance from the Sun. Mars is the fourth planet from the sun. In a lot of ways, Mars looks a lot like Earth, but instead of blue oceans and green land, Mars is has a constant red tint. A mineral called iron oxide that is very common on the planet’s surface causes this color. The diameter of Mars is 6,800 km across. This is 53% the diameter of Earth. The mass of Mars is only 10% the mass of Earth. Because of the small diameter and low mass, the gravity of Mars is only 38% the gravity of Earth. Mars has ice caps at its North and South Poles, much like Earth. In addition, both ice caps are made mostly of frozen water. Mars Student Sheet 4 does not have a protective layer of atmosphere like Earth, so it cannot store heat from the Sun. It lost its greenhouse effect, if it ever had one, when its atmosphere escaped into space. As a result, the temperature on Mars regularly drops to -125 °F in winter and only rises to 23 °F in summer. An imaginary visitor from another star, approaching our solar system from outside, could easily analyze the compositions of the atmospheres of the nine planets, using the same techniques that scientists use to study the atmospheres of Mars and Venus from a distance. This visitor would notice very quickly that Earth was the odd one of the terrestrial planets. Our planet has an imbalanced atmosphere, rich in oxygen; Mars and Venus have stable carbon dioxide atmospheres. However, they are totally without life as far as we know. Student Sheet 5 DATA TABLE #1: Temperature and Pressure VENUS EARTH MARS Comparison Surface Pressure Relative to Earth Major Greenhouse Gases Estimated Temperature if No Greenhouse Gases (°C) Actual Temperature (°C) Temperature Change Due to Greenhouse Gases DATA TABLE #2 Atmospheric Concentrations VENUS EARTH MARS of Greenhouse Gases (%) Carbon Dioxide (CO2) Nitrogen (N2) Oxygen (O2) Argon (Ar) Methane (CH4) Student Sheet 6 1. Write a brief explanation of how the term “ Goldilocks effect” came to be applied to the temperature variations seen in these three planets. 2. What is the main factor when determining atmospheric temperature of a planet? 3. What factors will trap energy in a planet’s atmospheric system? 4. What will reflect incoming solar radiation back into space? 5. What is the most variable component of the Earth’s atmosphere that is most likely the main reason that Earth does not experience huge temperature variations between day and night? 6. If the temperature of a planet is to remain constant, the energy in must _____________ the energy out. 7. Compare and contrast the atmosphere of Earth with the atmosphere’s of Venus and Mars. Draw picture, create a Venn diagram, or just write a description. 8. Explain how Earth’s atmosphere allows life to exist. 9. What must happen to Mars’ atmosphere for life to be possible there? 10. Explain why Venus is too hot and Mars is too cold. 11. Describe the concept of a “habitable zone.” 12. Why is it so much colder on Mars than on Venus, even though they have similar amounts of carbon dioxide? 1. In what ways do you think the planet where your extraterrestrial creature lives might be different from Earth? 2.Compare your extraterrestrial creature with others in the class. Could they all survive on the same planet? Why or why not? Student Sheet 7 ADAPTATION ADAPTATION OF ORGANISM 1. Kind of skin 2.Number of openings for waste removal 3.Long or other shapes 4.Segments 5. Appendages 6. Hard inside parts 7. Hard outside parts 8. Size 9. Feeding cells 10.Moving around 11.Sensing vibrations 12.Chemical senses 13. Number of eyes 14. Eating 15.Plant/Meat eater 16. Predator/Prey 17.Defensive structures 18.Poison as a defense 19.Defensive behaviors 20. Reproduction 21.Sexual/asexual reproduction 22. Mating practices 23.Offspring .
Recommended publications
  • Calculating the Potato Radius of Asteroids Using the Height of Mt. Everest
    Calculating the Potato Radius of Asteroids using the Height of Mt. Everest M. E. Caplan∗ Center for the Exploration of Energy and Matter, Indiana University, Bloomington, IN 47408 (Dated: November 16, 2015) Abstract At approximate radii of 200-300 km, asteroids transition from oblong `potato' shapes to spheres. This limit is known as the Potato Radius, and has been proposed as a classification for separating asteroids from dwarf planets. The Potato Radius can be calculated from first principles based on the elastic properties and gravity of the asteroid. Similarly, the tallest mountain that a planet can support is also known to be based on the elastic properties and gravity. In this work, a simple novel method of calculating the Potato Radius is presented using what is known about the maximum height of mountains and Newtonian gravity for a spherical body. This method does not assume any knowledge beyond high school level mechanics, and may be appropriate for students interested in applications of physics to astronomy. arXiv:1511.04297v1 [physics.ed-ph] 7 Nov 2015 1 I. INTRODUCTION Spacecraft are currently exploring asteroids and dwarf planets, such as the Near Earth Asteroid Rendezvous mission (NEAR) landing on Eros,1 the Dawn mission orbiting Ceres and Vesta,2 and the New Horizons flyby of Pluto and Charon.3 Additionally, the Mars Re- connaissance Orbiter (MRO) has observed the Martian moons Phobos and Deimos.4 These missions observe a remarkable variety of shapes for these bodies, shown in Fig. 1. Smaller asteroids have irregular shapes while dwarf planets (large asteroids) are nearly spherical.
    [Show full text]
  • Up, Up, and Away by James J
    www.astrosociety.org/uitc No. 34 - Spring 1996 © 1996, Astronomical Society of the Pacific, 390 Ashton Avenue, San Francisco, CA 94112. Up, Up, and Away by James J. Secosky, Bloomfield Central School and George Musser, Astronomical Society of the Pacific Want to take a tour of space? Then just flip around the channels on cable TV. Weather Channel forecasts, CNN newscasts, ESPN sportscasts: They all depend on satellites in Earth orbit. Or call your friends on Mauritius, Madagascar, or Maui: A satellite will relay your voice. Worried about the ozone hole over Antarctica or mass graves in Bosnia? Orbital outposts are keeping watch. The challenge these days is finding something that doesn't involve satellites in one way or other. And satellites are just one perk of the Space Age. Farther afield, robotic space probes have examined all the planets except Pluto, leading to a revolution in the Earth sciences -- from studies of plate tectonics to models of global warming -- now that scientists can compare our world to its planetary siblings. Over 300 people from 26 countries have gone into space, including the 24 astronauts who went on or near the Moon. Who knows how many will go in the next hundred years? In short, space travel has become a part of our lives. But what goes on behind the scenes? It turns out that satellites and spaceships depend on some of the most basic concepts of physics. So space travel isn't just fun to think about; it is a firm grounding in many of the principles that govern our world and our universe.
    [Show full text]
  • Surface Gravity and Interstellar Settlement (Version 3.0 September 2016)
    Surface Gravity and Interstellar Settlement (version 3.0 September 2016) by Gerald D. Nordley 1238 Prescott Avenue Sunnyvale, CA 94089-2334 [email protected] Abstract. Gravity determines the scale of many physical Jupiter's inner satellites melts the ice of Europa and drives phenomena on and above a world's surface. Assuming that tool- volcanoes on Io, and that Mars in the past has had rain and using intelligences come from, and would settle, worlds with solid floods serves notice that worlds that are significantly less surfaces and gravities equal or less than that of their origin, we massive than Earth and have significantly less surface gravity note that such worlds in the Solar System have surface gravities can still have the deep atmospheres and liquid water significantly lower than that of Earth. The distribution of these temperatures needed to sustain life. surface gravities clumps around factors of about 2.5 and favors worlds with about one-sixth Earth gravity, conventionally 2. Surface Gravity Basics considered too small to retain atmospheres. Titan, however, Mass is, roughly, a measure of the amount of substance. shows that low surface gravity does not, in itself, preclude the Weight is the force by which that substance is attracted to presence a substantial atmosphere. Where small worlds have another mass. This force is directly proportional to the product of low exobase temperatures,and protection from stellar winds, both masses and inversely proportional to the square of the substantial atmospheres may be retained. distance between them. A spherically symmetric planet can be Significantly lower surface gravity affects a number of physical treated as if all the mass were at the center, so the relevant phenomena that affect environment and technological evolution-- distance is the radius from the center to the object.
    [Show full text]
  • Companion Q&A Fact Sheet: What Mars Reveals About Life in Our
    What Mars Reveals about Life in Our Universe Companion Q&A Fact Sheet Educators from the Smithsonian’s Air and Space and Natural History Museums assembled this collection of commonly asked questions about Mars to complement the Smithsonian Science How webinar broadcast on March 3, 2021, “What Mars Reveals about Life in our Universe.” Continue to explore Mars and your own curiosities with these facts and additional resources: • NASA: Mars Overview • NASA: Mars Robotic Missions • National Air and Space Museum on the Smithsonian Learning Lab: “Wondering About Astronomy Together” Guide • National Museum of Natural History: A collection of resources for teaching about Antarctic Meteorites and Mars 1 • Smithsonian Science How: “What Mars Reveals about Life in our Universe” with experts Cari Corrigan, L. Miché Aaron, and Mariah Baker (aired March 3, 2021) Mars Overview How long is Mars’ day? Mars takes 24 hours and 38 minutes to spin around once, so its day is very similar to Earth’s. How long is Mars’ year? Mars takes 687 days, almost two Earth years, to complete one orbit around the Sun. How far is Mars from Earth? The distance between Earth and Mars changes as both planets move around the Sun in their orbits. At its closest, Mars is just 34 million miles from the Earth; that’s about one third of Earth’s distance from the Sun. On the day of this program, March 3, 2021, Mars was about 135 million miles away, or four times its closest distance. How far is Mars from the Sun? Mars orbits an average of 141 million miles from the Sun, which is about one-and-a-half times as far as the Earth is from the Sun.
    [Show full text]
  • "Is There Life on Venus?" Pdf File
    Home / Space / Specials Is there life on Venus? We call them "Martians" because, in science fiction, Mars has always been the natural home of extraterrestrials. In fact, of all the planets in the solar system, Mars is the prime candidate to host life, after Earth, of course. Indeed, Mars is on the outer edge of the habitable zone, that area around the Sun that delimits the space where the temperature is low enough to ensure that the water remains in a liquid state. And where there's water, it is well known, there's probably life. Yet it's cold on Mars today, and so far, all the probes and rovers we have sent to the surface of the red planet have found no signs of life. Planet Venus At the opposite end of the habitable belt there is Venus, similar in size and "geological" characteristics to our planet – that is, like Earth, it is a rocky planet. However, unlike Earth, Venus is probably one of the most inhospitable places in the Solar System: the temperature on the ground is about 500°C, higher than that recorded on Mercury, the planet closest to the Sun, so the Sun is not directly responsible for that infernal climate. The blame lies with the very extreme greenhouse effect on Venus. We know that the greenhouse effect is due to the presence of gases that trap solar radiation and heat the atmosphere. The main greenhouse gases are carbon dioxide (CO2), methane, water vapour and nitrogen oxides. On Earth we are rightly concerned because the amount of carbon dioxide is increasing due to human activities and with the increase in CO2, temperatures are rising.
    [Show full text]
  • Atmospheric Pressure
    Atmospheric pressure We all know that the atmosphere of Earth exerts a pressure on all of us. This pressure is the result of a column of air bearing down on us. However, in the seventeenth century, many scientists and philosophers believed that the air had no weight, which we already proved to be untrue in the lab (Remembered the fun you had sucking air out of the POM bottle?). Evangelista Torricelli, a student of Galileo’s, proved that air has weight using another experiment. He took a glass tube longer than 760 mm that is closed at one end and filled it completely with mercury. When he inverted the tube into a dish of mercury, some of the mercury flows out, but a column of mercury remained inside the tube. Torricelli argued that the mercury surface in the dish experiences the force of Earth’s atmosphere due to gravity, which held up the column of mercury. The force exerted by the atmosphere, which depends on the atmospheric pressure, equals the weight of mercury column in the tube. Therefore, the height of the mercury column can be used as a measure of atmospheric pressure. Although Torricelli’s explanation met with fierce opposition, it also had supporters. Blaise Pascal, for example, had one of Torricelli’s barometers carried to the top of a mountain and compared its reading there with the reading on a duplicate barometer at the base of the mountain. As the barometer was carried up, the height of the mercury column decreased, as expected, because the amount of air pressing down on the mercury in the dish decreased as the instrument was carried higher.
    [Show full text]
  • Characterising the Three-Dimensional Ozone Distribution of a Tidally Locked Earth-Like Planet
    Proedrou and Hocke Earth, Planets and Space (2016) 68:96 DOI 10.1186/s40623-016-0461-x FULL PAPER Open Access Characterising the three‑dimensional ozone distribution of a tidally locked Earth‑like planet Elisavet Proedrou1,2*† and Klemens Hocke1,2,3† Abstract We simulate the 3D ozone distribution of a tidally locked Earth-like exoplanet using the high-resolution, 3D chemistry- climate model CESM1(WACCM) and study how the ozone layer of a tidally locked Earth (TLE) (�TLE = 1/365 days) differs from that of our present-day Earth (PDE) �( PDE = 1/1 day). The middle atmosphere reaches a steady state asymptotically within the first 80 days of the simulation. An upwelling, centred on the subsolar point, is present on the day side while a downwelling, centred on the antisolar point, is present on the night side. In the mesosphere, we find similar global ozone distributions for the TLE and the PDE, with decreased ozone on the day side and enhanced ozone on the night side. In the lower mesosphere, a jet stream transitions into a large-scale vortex around a low-pressure system, located at low latitudes of the TLE night side. In the middle stratosphere, the concentration of odd oxygen is approximately equal to that of the ozone [(Ox) ≈ (O3)]. At these altitudes, the lifetime of odd oxygen is ∼16 h and the transport processes significantly contribute to the global distribution of stratospheric ozone. Compared to the PDE, where the strong Coriolis force acts as a mixing barrier between low and high latitudes, the transport processes of the TLE are governed by jet streams variable in the zonal and meridional directions.
    [Show full text]
  • Radar Sounder Evidence of Thick, Porous Sediments in Meridiani
    PUBLICATIONS Geophysical Research Letters RESEARCH LETTER Radar sounder evidence of thick, porous sediments 10.1002/2017GL074431 in Meridiani Planum and implications Key Points: for ice-filled deposits on Mars • The MARSIS radar sounder has detected subsurface echoes deep Thomas R. Watters1 , Carl J. Leuschen2, Bruce A. Campbell1 , Gareth A. Morgan1 , within the Meridiani Planum deposits 3 1 4 5 • The time delay between surface and Andrea Cicchetti , John A. Grant , Roger J. Phillips , and Jeffrey J. Plaut subsurface echoes is consistent with 1 2 deposits having a low bulk value of Center for Earth and Planetary Studies, Smithsonian Institution, Washington, District of Columbia, USA, Center for Remote the real dielectric constant Sensing of Ice Sheets, University of Kansas, Lawrence, Kansas, USA, 3Infocom Department, La Sapienza University of Rome, • New compaction relationships for Rome, Italy, 4Department of Earth and Planetary Sciences and McDonnell Center for the Space Sciences, Washington Mars indicate that a low dielectric University, St. Louis, Missouri, USA, 5Jet Propulsion Laboratory, California Institute of Technology, Pasadena, California, USA constant can be accounted for without invoking pore-filling water ice Abstract Meridiani Planum is one of the most intensely studied regions on Mars, yet little is known about Supporting Information: the physical properties of the deposits below those examined by the Opportunity rover. We report the • Supporting Information S1 detection of subsurface echoes within the Meridiani Planum deposits from data obtained by the Mars Advanced Radar for Subsurface and Ionospheric Sounding (MARSIS) instrument. The delay time between the Correspondence to: T. R. Watters, surface and subsurface returns is indicative of materials with a real dielectric constant of 3.6 ± 0.6.
    [Show full text]
  • Physical Changes
    How Matter Changes By Cindy Grigg Changes in matter happen around you every day. Some changes make matter look different. Other changes make one kind of matter become another kind of matter. When you scrunch a sheet of paper up into a ball, it is still paper. It only changed shape. You can cut a large, rectangular piece of paper into many small triangles. It changed shape and size, but it is still paper. These kinds of changes are called physical changes. Physical changes are changes in the way matter looks. Changes in size and shape, like the changes in the cut pieces of paper, are physical changes. Physical changes are changes in the size, shape, state, or appearance of matter. Another kind of physical change happens when matter changes from one state to another state. When water freezes and makes ice, it is still water. It has only changed its state of matter from a liquid to a solid. It has changed its appearance and shape, but it is still water. You can change the ice back into water by letting it melt. Matter looks different when it changes states, but it stays the same kind of matter. Solids like ice can change into liquids. Heat speeds up the moving particles in ice. The particles move apart. Heat melts ice and changes it to liquid water. Metals can be changed from a solid to a liquid state also. Metals must be heated to a high temperature to melt. Melting is changing from a solid state to a liquid state.
    [Show full text]
  • Human Exploration of Mars Design Reference Architecture 5.0
    July 2009 “We are all . children of this universe. Not just Earth, or Mars, or this System, but the whole grand fireworks. And if we are interested in Mars at all, it is only because we wonder over our past and worry terribly about our possible future.” — Ray Bradbury, 'Mars and the Mind of Man,' 1973 Cover Art: An artist’s concept depicting one of many potential Mars exploration strategies. In this approach, the strengths of combining a central habitat with small pressurized rovers that could extend the exploration range of the crew from the outpost are assessed. Rawlings 2007. NASA/SP–2009–566 Human Exploration of Mars Design Reference Architecture 5.0 Mars Architecture Steering Group NASA Headquarters Bret G. Drake, editor NASA Johnson Space Center, Houston, Texas July 2009 ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS The individuals listed in the appendix assisted in the generation of the concepts as well as the descriptions, images, and data described in this report. Specific contributions to this document were provided by Dave Beaty, Stan Borowski, Bob Cataldo, John Charles, Cassie Conley, Doug Craig, Bret Drake, John Elliot, Chad Edwards, Walt Engelund, Dean Eppler, Stewart Feldman, Jim Garvin, Steve Hoffman, Jeff Jones, Frank Jordan, Sheri Klug, Joel Levine, Jack Mulqueen, Gary Noreen, Hoppy Price, Shawn Quinn, Jerry Sanders, Jim Schier, Lisa Simonsen, George Tahu, and Abhi Tripathi. Available from: NASA Center for AeroSpace Information National Technical Information Service 7115 Standard Drive 5285 Port Royal Road Hanover, MD 21076-1320 Springfield, VA 22161 Phone: 301-621-0390 or 703-605-6000 Fax: 301-621-0134 This report is also available in electronic form at http://ston.jsc.nasa.gov/collections/TRS/ CONTENTS 1 Introduction ......................................................................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • Cosmic Microwave Background
    1 29. Cosmic Microwave Background 29. Cosmic Microwave Background Revised August 2019 by D. Scott (U. of British Columbia) and G.F. Smoot (HKUST; Paris U.; UC Berkeley; LBNL). 29.1 Introduction The energy content in electromagnetic radiation from beyond our Galaxy is dominated by the cosmic microwave background (CMB), discovered in 1965 [1]. The spectrum of the CMB is well described by a blackbody function with T = 2.7255 K. This spectral form is a main supporting pillar of the hot Big Bang model for the Universe. The lack of any observed deviations from a 7 blackbody spectrum constrains physical processes over cosmic history at redshifts z ∼< 10 (see earlier versions of this review). Currently the key CMB observable is the angular variation in temperature (or intensity) corre- lations, and to a growing extent polarization [2–4]. Since the first detection of these anisotropies by the Cosmic Background Explorer (COBE) satellite [5], there has been intense activity to map the sky at increasing levels of sensitivity and angular resolution by ground-based and balloon-borne measurements. These were joined in 2003 by the first results from NASA’s Wilkinson Microwave Anisotropy Probe (WMAP)[6], which were improved upon by analyses of data added every 2 years, culminating in the 9-year results [7]. In 2013 we had the first results [8] from the third generation CMB satellite, ESA’s Planck mission [9,10], which were enhanced by results from the 2015 Planck data release [11, 12], and then the final 2018 Planck data release [13, 14]. Additionally, CMB an- isotropies have been extended to smaller angular scales by ground-based experiments, particularly the Atacama Cosmology Telescope (ACT) [15] and the South Pole Telescope (SPT) [16].
    [Show full text]
  • What Is Ozone Layer? a Layer in the Atmosphere of Earth That Protects Us from Harmful UV Rays from the Sun
    International Day for Preservation of Ozone Layer 16 September 2020 Image Source: https://sfxstl.org/circleofcreation What is Ozone layer? A layer in the atmosphere of Earth that protects us from harmful UV rays from the Sun. It’s responsible for preserving life on the planet! What is happening? The ozone layer has begun to deplete because of harmful chemical substances and gases. This problem is not only contributing to global warming and climate change, but also allowing the dangerous radiation from the sun to affect human beings and ecosystems! Source: https://www.un.org/en/events/ozoneday/ What is causing its depletion? ● Human activities are the biggest cause of the ozone layer depletion ● When we burn coal, natural gas and other fuels for electricity, they release harmful gases such as carbon dioxide, nitrous oxide, etc that spread into the atmosphere and surround us like a blanket ● These harmful gases, called greenhouse gases, trap heat and radiation from the sun, which is causing the depletion as well as global warming. Clorofluorocarbons (CFCs), which are found in ACs and halogens, are other harmful greenhouse gases. Sources: https://e360.yale.edu/features/geoengineer-the-planet-more-scientists-now-say-it-must-be-an-option https://www.ucsusa.org/resources/ozone-hole-and-global-warming What can we do? Some things we can do to reduce our contribution to ozone layer depletion are: 1. Minimize use of cars. 2. Maintain your ACs regularly. 3. Avoid using products that are harmful to the environment and to us. 4. Buy local products which are more eco- friendly.
    [Show full text]