Introduction

Total Page:16

File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

Introduction 01-5217-2-CH 1 2/6/04 9:49 AM Page 1 1 Introduction omething was stirring across East Asia in the opening Syears of the twenty-first century. A region that had been notable for its lack of internal economic links over the previous fifty years was talking actively about regional cooperation. Given the consolidation of the European Union, the formation of the North American Free Trade Area, and the rapid proliferation of bilateral free trade areas around the world, the talk was not surprising. Neverthe- less, East Asia’s relative lack of past action raises many ques- tions about its emerging regionalism. Why has the region suddenly shifted from taking a global approach to eco- nomic issues to discussing a regional bloc? How fast and how far will the new regionalism progress? Will the region become a version of the European Union, or something far less? What is the probable impact on American economic and strategic interests—are the likely developments some- thing that the U.S. government should encourage or dis- courage? This book takes up these questions. Some advocates envision an East Asian equivalent of the EU—a region linked both by preferential trade and 1 01-5217-2-CH 1 2/6/04 9:49 AM Page 2 2 Introduction investment and by a common currency. The same vision underlies worries in the United States that if it is realized, East Asia may drift away from its strong trans-Pacific economic ties. Some may find this vision so unrealis- tic as to represent a straw man; nevertheless, the talk in East Asia makes it a straw man worth analyzing. So far, nothing akin to the economic consolidation of Europe or North America has occurred in East Asia. However, regional institutions do exist, and others under discussion or negotiation could evolve in a manner that either aids or obstructs American interests in the Asia-Pacific region. The core issue is whether East Asia will drift toward a more exclusive economic regionalism that specifically shuts out the United States or continue to embrace broader regional and global institutions and their more liberal rules for economic interaction. Recent developments suggest that the region is indeed moving, albeit slowly and cautiously, toward a more exclu- sive regionalism that could have negative consequences for the United States. Certainly much of the rhetoric concerning East Asian regionalism has sounded a strong anti-Western or anti-American theme. Nonetheless, a principal conclusion of this book is that such moves are relatively weak and slow. This book takes a skeptical view of regional groupings in general. For- mal blocs involve distortions of trade and investment that generally are undesirable. Furthermore, a tight regionalism like that of the European Union can also involve an ethnic or racially inspired hubris that can com- plicate international relations more broadly. That might be especially true in East Asia, where there has been a tendency to emphasize “Asian values” and reject “Western” economic, political, or social principles. With notions of cultural superiority that are at least as explicit as those ingrained in the European Union, East Asian regionalism carries the potential for promot- ing an unhelpful divisiveness and tension in the region’s economic and political relations with the rest of the world. In addition, manufacturing technology, as well as the information tech- nology that underlies much of the service sector, has been moving steadily toward larger economies of scale, which lead to global competition. Firms also are developing the personnel and technical capability to engage in global direct investment. As much as some interest groups in society may deplore globalism, economic activity should continue to move in that direction. To divide the world up into a variety of groupings, each with dif- ferent rules of access, can only impede progress; an East Asian economic bloc therefore would not be desirable. 01-5217-2-CH 1 2/6/04 9:49 AM Page 3 Introduction 3 A fascinating disconnect has emerged between the growing American embrace of globalism as an economic and business concept and the rising Asian resentment of what some Asians view as American or European in- terference in their economies. Whereas twenty years ago, purchase of American companies or real estate by foreign investors generated media coverage, today most Americans appear to have abandoned a nation- centered view of the economy. While there is a “globaphobia” problem in the United States, the predominant world view among business people and policymakers has become much more open.1 This openness includes less reliance on legal means to block foreign businesses from the U.S. market and a stronger global strategic view among corporate managers. But in Asia, concern over American influence or dominance continues to be a fac- tor behind the interest in regional economic cooperation. Resentment of the United States is not new, and it may be simply one of the costs of being the world’s largest economy and having globally active firms. However, in East Asia resentment of the United States and the West more generally received a boost from the 1997 Asian financial crisis. From an Asian perspective, the crisis was precipitated by Western speculators. Some point out that the U.S. government initially downplayed the crisis in Thailand and Indonesia, in contrast to its swift engagement in some other crises, such as that in Mexico. Once engaged, the U.S. government worked with the International Monetary Fund (IMF) for solutions, but the IMF imposed conditions for its loans that many felt were unfair or wrong. Of course, criticism of the IMF has not been confined to Asians; however, they have argued that the IMF has tried to “force” Western or American capitalism on Asia. Some voices in the region have argued that therefore the East Asian nations need to band together to protect themselves from the ravages of Western speculators and the unfair demands of the U.S. gov- ernment and the IMF. Feelings of frustration and angry words, however, do not always find expression in action. This book looks at what has been happening with trade and investment links and with the development of regional institutions. The fundamental conclusion is that far less move- ment toward a regional bloc is occurring than the rhetoric would suggest. A conundrum faces the developing countries of Asia and those else- where. They, or at least the noncommunist nations in the region, liked the framework imposed by the cold war. During that era, most developing countries maintained stiff import and investment barriers that were toler- ated by the United States, which wanted to humor its friends in the strug- gle against communism. Those barriers enabled these nations to develop 01-5217-2-CH 1 2/6/04 9:49 AM Page 4 4 Introduction on their own, reversing several centuries of foreign domination of their economies through colonialism, and because of that they were politically popular. On the other hand, protectionism resulted in weak or flawed legal and institutional systems for pursuing modern economic development and often promoted inefficient or corrupt business practices. For a time, these nations managed to maintain high rates of economic growth and industri- alization anyway. But the 1997 financial crisis was a potent lesson in the problems that eventually befall flawed economic systems. So now these countries must deal with the contradiction between their nationalistic urge to keep foreigners (especially Americans and other Westerners) out of their core economies and the need to open up in recognition of the fact that their institutions and behavior must accommodate international trade and investment if they hope to underwrite more robust economic growth and industrialization. Even Japan faces this dilemma. The emergence of eco- nomic regionalism in East Asia is, in part, an attempt by these countries to find a middle path by creating a preferential opening up among them- selves, thereby still keeping the West at some distance. How great that distance should or will be remains debatable. A decade ago, Lester Thurow wrote of a coming competition between three large economic blocs—Europe, North America, and Asia.2 That prediction has not come true. Nothing resembling an economic bloc has yet to emerge in Asia, but discussion in that direction has progressed over the past decade. Some now see it as a real possibility. Writing in 2001, C. Fred Bergsten stated that “East Asia, for the first time in history, is creating its own eco- nomic bloc, which could include preferential trade arrangements and cur- rency cooperation in the form of an Asian monetary fund (AMF).”3 The reality thus far appears to be less dramatic. A number of Asian nations are involved in negotiations or proposals for regional or bilateral free trade agreements (FTAs). The Association of Southeast Asian Nations (ASEAN) is in the process of forming an ASEAN free trade area; China has entered negotiations for an ASEAN-China FTA; and Japan has signed a bilateral FTA with Singapore. Other ideas—includ- ing a proposal for a broader free trade area among ASEAN, China, South Korea, and Japan—have been floated informally. The change in Japan’s trade policy, which until the late 1990s had been firmly rooted in global- ism—that is, centered on the General Agreement on Tariffs and Trade (GATT) and the World Trade Organization (WTO) rather than on region- alism—has been dramatic, at least in terms of rhetoric. Analysis of these 01-5217-2-CH 1 2/6/04 9:49 AM Page 5 Introduction 5 discussions and agreements, however, reveals that Asian nations face con- siderable difficulty in opening up, even among themselves.
Recommended publications
  • Executive Intelligence Review, Volume 24, Number 45, November 7
    EIR Founder and Contributing Editor: Lyndon H. LaRouche, Jr. Editorial Board: Melvin Klenetsky, Lyndon H. LaRouche, Jr., Antony Papert, Gerald Rose, From the Associate Editor Dennis Small, Edward Spannaus, Nancy Spannaus, Jeffrey Steinberg, Webster Tarpley, William Wertz Associate Editor: Susan Welsh ll around the world, in the aftermath of the Black Monday stock Managing Editors: John Sigerson, A Ronald Kokinda market crash, people are telling EIR, “LaRouche was right!” “He’s a Science Editor: Marjorie Mazel Hecht prophet,” many have said. Actually, as Lyndon LaRouche said in an Special Projects: Mark Burdman Book Editor: Katherine Notley interview on Oct. 28, “I’m not a prophet. I’m just a scientist, and Advertising Director: Marsha Freeman I can tell you what the laws of the universe indicate will happen as a Circulation Manager: Stanley Ezrol result of what’s going on, or policies we have, and what the approxi- INTELLIGENCE DIRECTORS: mate timing might be of these consequences, depending on which Asia and Africa: Linda de Hoyos Counterintelligence: Jeffrey Steinberg, branch of the road we take.” Paul Goldstein Economics: Marcia Merry Baker, What everybody wants to know now, is 1) How did LaRouche William Engdahl know what was going to happen? and 2) What do we do now? How History: Anton Chaitkin Ibero-America: Robyn Quijano, Dennis Small do we prevent a vaporization of the world financial and monetary Law: Edward Spannaus system, which would cause untold human suffering? Russia and Eastern Europe: Rachel Douglas, Konstantin George To find out the answers to these questions, you have come to the United States: Kathleen Klenetsky right place.
    [Show full text]
  • The Rise and Decline of Catching up Development an Experience of Russia and Latin America with Implications for Asian ‘Tigers’
    Victor Krasilshchikov The Rise and Decline of Catching up Development An Experience of Russia and Latin America with Implications for Asian ‘Tigers’ ENTELEQUIA REVISTA INTERDISCIPLINAR The Rise and Decline of Catching up Development An Experience of Russia and Latin America with Implications for Asian `Tigers' by Victor Krasilshchikov Second edition, July 2008 ISBN: Pending Biblioteca Nacional de España Reg. No.: Pending Published by Entelequia. Revista Interdisciplinar (grupo Eumed´net) available at http://www.eumed.net/entelequia/en.lib.php?a=b008 Copyright belongs to its own author, acording to Creative Commons license: Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivs 2.5 made up using OpenOffice.org THE RISE AND DECLINE OF CATCHING UP DEVELOPMENT (The Experience of Russia and Latin America with Implications for the Asian ‘Tigers’) 2nd edition By Victor Krasilshchikov About the Author: Victor Krasilshchikov (Krassilchtchikov) was born in Moscow on November 25, 1952. He graduated from the economic faculty of Moscow State University. He obtained the degrees of Ph.D. (1982) and Dr. of Sciences (2002) in economics. He works at the Centre for Development Studies, Institute of World Economy and International Relations (IMEMO), Russian Academy of Sciences. He is convener of the working group “Transformations in the World System – Comparative Studies in Development” of European Association of Development Research and Training Institutes (EADI – www.eadi.org) and author of three books (in Russian) and many articles (in Russian, English, and Spanish). 2008 THE RISE AND DECLINE OF CATCHING UP DEVELOPMENT Entelequia.Revista Interdisciplinar Victor Krasilshchikov / 2 THE RISE AND DECLINE OF CATCHING UP DEVELOPMENT C O N T E N T S Abbreviations 5 Preface and Acknowledgements 7 PART 1.
    [Show full text]
  • Pan-Asianism As an Ideal of Asian Identity and Solidarity, 1850–Present アジアの主体性・団結の理想としての汎アジア主 義−−1850年から今日まで
    Volume 9 | Issue 17 | Number 1 | Article ID 3519 | Apr 25, 2011 The Asia-Pacific Journal | Japan Focus Pan-Asianism as an Ideal of Asian Identity and Solidarity, 1850–Present アジアの主体性・団結の理想としての汎アジア主 義−−1850年から今日まで Christopher W. A. Szpilman, Sven Saaler Pan-Asianism as an Ideal of Asian Attempts to define Asia are almost as old as the Identity and Solidarity,term itself. The word “Asia” originated in ancient Greece in the fifth century BC. It 1850–Present originally denoted the lands of the Persian Empire extending east of the Bosphorus Straits Sven Saaler and Christopher W. A. but subsequently developed into a general term Szpilman used by Europeans to describe all the lands lying to the east of Europe. (The point where This is a revised, updated and abbreviated Europe ended and Asia began was, however, version of the introduction to the two volume never clearly defined.) Often, this usage collection by the authors ofPan-Asianism. A connoted a threat, real or perceived, by Asia to Documentary History Vol. 1 covers the years Europe—a region smaller in area, much less 1850-1920; Vol. 2 covers the years 1850- populous, poorer, and far less significant than present, link. Asia in terms of global history. The economic and political power of Asia, the The term “Asia” arrived in East Asia relatively world’s largest continent, is increasing rapidly. late, being introduced by Jesuit missionaries in According to the latest projections, the gross the sixteenth century. The term is found, domestic products of China and India, the written in Chinese characters 亜細亜( ), on world’s most populous nations, will each Chinese maps of the world made around 1600 surpass that of the United States in the not-too- under the supervision of Matteo Ricci distant future.
    [Show full text]
  • THE IMF and EAST ASIA: a CHANGING REGIONAL FINANCIAL ARCHITECTURE Introduction
    THE IMF AND EAST ASIA: A CHANGING REGIONAL FINANCIAL ARCHITECTURE The financial crises of 1997 and 1998 have had a profound effect on how East Asia sees the role of the IMF and its strategic interests relative to those of the United States in international finance. The crises have spurred demand for a regional financial architec- ture in East Asia – ranging from deeper policy dialogue and surveillance, a system of financial cooperation, and even talk of common exchange rate arrangements. This paper analyses the economic, strategic and chauvinistic motivations behind this, and evaluates the merit of some of these proposals. Regional policy dialogue and surveillance in East Asia are weak, and the strengthening that is occurring through the ASEAN+3 grouping is welcome and important. There is also a strong case to be made for regional financial cooperation to complement global arrangements. A regional arrangement can secure liquidity and financing support to respond to small or localised crises, and may be a more effective preventive measure than the IMF’s Contingent Credit Line facility. A regional arrangement would also boost policy dialogue and surveillance. But progress to date has been slow. Introduction The financial crises of 1997 and 1998 have had a profound effect on East Asia’s view of international financial and monetary arrangements, including the role of the International Monetary Fund in international policy dialogue and financial cooperation.1 There has been a tectonic shift in the policy landscape of the region.2 While there are differences between and within countries, no longer is East Asia content to rely almost exclusively on global forums, mechanisms and institutions; it now wants to develop a complementary regional structure.
    [Show full text]
  • The Future Role of the IMF: Asian Perspectives
    Regional Governance Architecture FES Briefing Paper February 2006 Page 1 The Future Role of the IMF: Asian Perspectives = qfqfh=^k^p=L=abkf=cof^t^k= = = = = = = The Future Role of the IMF FES Briefing Paper 1 | February 2008 Page 2 1 Introduction nomic review process, and development of Asian bond markets. There are a few other initiatives The 1997 financial crisis really shook the Asian such as the SEACAN Expert Group on Capital region. The financial system in three Asian Flows initiative, The EMEAP Governors and De- economies collapsed in a few days. The crisis ab- puties Meeting initiative, The APEC Finance Mi- sorbed International Monetary Fund (IMF) and nister Meeting, and the informal ASEAN+3 Fi- lender nations’ funds for liquidity support of US$ nance and Central Bank Deputies Meeting. 17.2 billion for Thailand, US$ 42.3 billion for In- donesia, US$ 58.4 billion for Korea, and US$ 1 In the early stage of its development, the severity billion for the Philippines. The rescue program, of the crisis and the disappointment with the however, was not smooth, and in many cases it IMF mechanism for handling the crisis were the worsened the conditions. cÉêáÇÜ~åìëÉíó~ï~å= main drivers behind regional financial coopera- ~åÇ= ^å~ë= (2000) showed how the IMF’s presc- tion. In the later period, the factors motivating ription to Indonesia made the economy plunge this region to engage in closer regional financial even deeper. The crisis really gave the region a cooperation differed somewhat. China and its very hard lesson on the importance of financial open trade policy are considered an important stability.
    [Show full text]
  • Regional Cooperation in Asia: Long-Term Progress, Recent Retrogression, and the Way Forward
    A Service of Leibniz-Informationszentrum econstor Wirtschaft Leibniz Information Centre Make Your Publications Visible. zbw for Economics Agarwala, Ramgopal; Prakash, Brahm Working Paper Regional Cooperation in Asia: Long-term Progress, Recent Retrogression, and the Way Forward ERD Working Paper Series, No. 28 Provided in Cooperation with: Asian Development Bank (ADB), Manila Suggested Citation: Agarwala, Ramgopal; Prakash, Brahm (2002) : Regional Cooperation in Asia: Long-term Progress, Recent Retrogression, and the Way Forward, ERD Working Paper Series, No. 28, Asian Development Bank (ADB), Manila, http://hdl.handle.net/11540/1936 This Version is available at: http://hdl.handle.net/10419/109245 Standard-Nutzungsbedingungen: Terms of use: Die Dokumente auf EconStor dürfen zu eigenen wissenschaftlichen Documents in EconStor may be saved and copied for your Zwecken und zum Privatgebrauch gespeichert und kopiert werden. personal and scholarly purposes. Sie dürfen die Dokumente nicht für öffentliche oder kommerzielle You are not to copy documents for public or commercial Zwecke vervielfältigen, öffentlich ausstellen, öffentlich zugänglich purposes, to exhibit the documents publicly, to make them machen, vertreiben oder anderweitig nutzen. publicly available on the internet, or to distribute or otherwise use the documents in public. Sofern die Verfasser die Dokumente unter Open-Content-Lizenzen (insbesondere CC-Lizenzen) zur Verfügung gestellt haben sollten, If the documents have been made available under an Open gelten abweichend von diesen Nutzungsbedingungen die in der dort Content Licence (especially Creative Commons Licences), you genannten Lizenz gewährten Nutzungsrechte. may exercise further usage rights as specified in the indicated licence. http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/3.0/igo www.econstor.eu ERD WORKING PAPER SERIES NO.
    [Show full text]
  • Las Relaciones Civico – Militares En Estados Unidos
    2 Fuerzas profundas e identidad. Reflexiones en torno a su impacto sobre la política exterior. Un recorrido de casos / Anabella Busso ... [et al.] ; compilado por Anabella Busso. - 1a ed. - Rosario: Universidad Nacional de Rosario, 2008. EBook. ISBN 978-950-673-711-5 1. Política Exterior. I. Busso, Anabella II. Busso, Anabella, comp. CDD 327.1 Diseño Editorial: D.G. Joaquín Paronzini Fecha de catalogación: 23/12/2008 ÍNDICE Prólogo ……..........................................................................................................................................( 04) Fuerzas profundas, identidad y política exterior. Reflexiones teóricas y metodológicas Anabella Busso y María Eva Pignatta ……..........................................................................................................................................( 06) Identidad y fuerzas profundas en Estados Unidos. Excepcionalismo, tradición liberal-tradición conservadora, aislacionismo-internacionalismo, política y religión: su impacto en la política exterior Anabella Busso ……...........................................................................................................................................(19) Las relaciones cívico-militares en Estados Unidos. ¿Una fuerza profunda en proceso de cambio? Anabella Busso ……...........................................................................................................................................(82) Entender a Rusia a través de sus fuerzas profundas: dificultades y desafíos de una reflexión recurrente
    [Show full text]
  • The Future of the Chiang Mai Initiative: an Asian Monetary Fund?
    Policy Brief N U M B E R P B 0 9 - 5 FEBRUARY 2009 arrangements (BSAs) dubbed the Chiang Mai Initiative (CMI) The Future of the Chiang Mai and are negotiating among themselves to build these BSAs into a more comprehensive facility. Some Asian officials hope that Initiative: An Asian Monetary such a facility could underpin exchange rate cooperation and monetary integration in the region, although such proposals remain for the moment long-term visions. Fund? The present financial crisis raises the prospect that some governments might draw on their BSAs under the CMI and C. Randall Henning increases the stakes in the CMI’s possible future development into a comprehensive facility. This juncture thus represents a C. Randall Henning, visiting fellow, has been associated with the Peterson moment of truth for East Asia: Are these governments serious Institute since 1986. He serves on the faculty of the School of International about financial cooperation? Can they overcome rivalries and Service, American University. He specializes in the politics and institutions make the difficult political decisions to advance it? Will they of international economic relations, international and comparative political adhere to or break from international financial institutions such economy, and regional integration. He is the author of Accountability and Oversight of US Exchange Rate Policy (2008), East Asian Financial as the IMF? Cooperation (2002), The Exchange Stabilization Fund: Slush Money Senior officials of East Asian governments and central banks or War Chest? (1999), Cooperating with Europe’s Monetary Union will meet three times between February and May 2009 to consid- (1997), Currencies and Politics in the United States, Germany, and er, among other things, transforming the CMI from a network of Japan (1994) and recent journal articles on exchange rate policymaking in BSAs into a collectively managed fund.
    [Show full text]
  • Regional Economic Integration in Asia: the Track Record and Prospects
    ECIPE Occasional Paper • no. 2/2010 REGIONAL ECONOMIC INTEGRATION IN ASIA: THE TRACK RECORD AND PROSPECTS By Razeen Sally Razeen Sally ([email protected]) is Director of ECIPE and on the faculty of the London School of Economics www.ecipe.org [email protected] Rue Belliard 4-6, 1040 Brussels, Belgium Phone +32 (0)2 289 1350 ECIPE OCCASIONAL PAPER EXecUtiVE SUmmarY This is the season for regional-integration initiatives in Asia. There is talk of region-wide FTAs, and there are east-Asian initiatives on financial and monetary cooperation. But grand visions for Asian regional blocs are not achievable. Regional economic integration is most developed in east Asia, but only because of manufacturing supply chains linked to global markets. South Asia is the most malintegrated region in the world. And east and south Asia are much less integrated in finance than they are in trade and FDI – due to highly restrictive national policies governing financial markets. Asia’s existing FTAs are “trade light”. They are largely limited to tariff cuts, but have barely tackled non-tariff regulatory barriers in goods, services and investment, and are bedevilled by complex rules of origin requirements. An APEC FTA initiative has gone nowhere – entirely predictable given such a large, het- erogeneous grouping. An east-Asian or a pan-Asian FTA, by discriminating against third countries, would compromise regional production networks linked to global supply chains. Moreover, huge economic gaps and enduring political differences will stymie Asian regional integration for some time to come. As for regional monetary and financial cooperation, it is embryonic, very soft and confined to east Asia.
    [Show full text]
  • Throughout Its History Japan Has Been an Outlier, a Country “In” but in Many Ways Not “Of” Asia
    The Outlier: Japan between Asia and the West Throughout its history Japan has been an outlier, a country “in” but in many ways not “of” Asia. In premodern times it was set off by its feudal order, its refusal to participate in the Chinese tributary system, and its withdrawal into national seclusion. Modern Japan has oscillated, at times violently, between Asia and the West. In the late nineteenth century, it “quit Asia” and joined the West, remaking itself into a Western-style industrial and military power and carving out an Asian empire, largely at the expense of China and Korea. In the 1930s, it rejected the West and embarked on a crusade to liberate Asia from Western domi- nance, which led it in 1945 to the unprecedented catastrophe of total defeat and foreign occupation. Postwar Japan again embraced the West, reinventing itself as a democratic “peace state” and economic superpower. Sheltered behind the American alliance, the Japanese retreated from international politics and focused on economic growth. They returned to Asia, this time as its economic model, mentor and—increasingly—leader. At the end of the Cold War, Japan seemed poised to once again reject the West and seek Asian leadership. Instead, post-Cold War Japan tilted toward the United States and moved tentatively to assume “normal” international political-military responsibilities. It is as yet unclear where the Japanese will find a balance among an Asian role, the American alliance, and a “normal” international political-military role. One can be sure, however, that Japan’s future will be conditioned by its past.
    [Show full text]
  • Institutionalizing Financial Cooperation in East Asia AMRO and the Future of the Chiang Mai Initiative Multilateralization
    Global Governance 26 (2020) 428–448 brill.com/gg Institutionalizing Financial Cooperation in East Asia AMRO and the Future of the Chiang Mai Initiative Multilateralization William W. Grimes Frederick S. Pardee School of Global Studies, Boston University, Boston, MA, USA [email protected] William N. Kring Global Development Policy Center, Boston University, Boston, MA, USA [email protected] Abstract Since the 1997 Asian financial crisis, East Asia’s ASEAN+3 states have built the second- largest regional emergency liquidity fund in the world, the Chiang Mai Initiative Multi- lateralization (CMIM). With a total commitment of $240 billion to aid member states facing a currency crisis, CMIM can provide more funds to members than the Interna- tional Monetary Fund (IMF). Nonetheless, CMIM continues to be functionally sub- ordinate to IMF decisions. This may now be changing following the 2011 creation of the ASEAN+3 Macroeconomic Research Office (AMRO) as a regional mechanism to manage surveillance and design of CMIM lending programs. The ability to delegate surveillance and program design to an independent body is a crucial prerequisite to ending CMIM’s subordination to the IMF, and AMRO seeks to ensure such autonomy through its institutional design. This article analyzes AMRO’s progress toward auton- omy, using indicators of effective delegation drawn from organizational theory and newly available information and data on AMRO. Keywords Chiang Mai Initiative Multilateralization – International Monetary Fund – ASEAN+3 © koninklijke brill nv, leiden, 2020 | doi:10.1163/19426720-02603005 institutionalizing financial cooperation in east asia 429 1 Introduction The global system was ill-prepared for the onset of the Asian financial crisis (AFC) in 1997.
    [Show full text]
  • Financial Cooperation in East Asia
    RSIS Monograph No. 35 RSIS Monograph FINANCIAL COOPERATION IN EAST ASIA FINANCIAL COOPERATION FINANCIAL COOPERATION IN EAST ASIA Tomoo Kikuchi and Masaya Sakuragawa and Masaya Kikuchi Tomoo Edited by RSIS Monograph No. 35 Tomoo Kikuchi and Masaya March 2019 Sakuragawa RSIS MONOGRAPH NO. 35 FINANCIAL COOPERATION IN EAST ASIA Edited by Tomoo Kikuchi and Masaya Sakuragawa S. Rajaratnam School of International Studies Copyright © 2019 each author for his or her own chapter Published by S. Rajaratnam School of International Studies Nanyang Technological University Block S4, Level B3, 50 Nanyang Avenue Singapore 639798 Telephone: 6790 6982 Fax: 6794 0617 Website: www.rsis.edu.sg First published in 2019 All rights reserved. No part of this publication may be reproduced, stored in a retrieval system, or transmitted in any form or by any means, electronic, mechanical, photocopying, recording or otherwise, without the prior written permission of the S. Rajaratnam School of International Studies. Produced by BOOKSMITH ([email protected]) ISBN 978-981-14-1134-2 TABLE OF CONTENTS 1 Introduction 1 Tomoo Kikuchi and Masaya Sakuragawa Part I The Role of Financial Markets 2 The Asian Century and Policy Challenges 6 Keynote Speech by Dr Siddharth Tiwari Masahiro Kawai 3 Asian Bond Market Development 11 Masahiro Kawai 4 “Missing Links” in the Financial System in ASEAN 27 Future Challenges in Regional Financial Cooperation Fumiharu Mieno 5 Foreign Direct Investment in ASEAN and its Policy Challenges 36 Chia-yi Lee 6 Capital Flows in ASEAN 45 Satoshi
    [Show full text]