DOCSLIB.ORG

Ezel Movement

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Ezel Movement EzeEzell MovemenMovementt ArchiveArchivess 1936-19481936-1948 onon microfichemicrofiche JabotinskyJabotinsky Institute,Institute, TelTel AvivAviv DocumentsDocuments ofof ththee IrguIrgunn A guidguidee ttoo ththee sourcessources ZvaiZvai LeumiLeumi ("Ezel") ArchivesArchives,, in ththee usualusual sense,sense, dodo notnot existexist forfor Ezel. TheThe distinctlydistinctly clandestineclandestine charactecharacterr ooff thethe organizatioorganizationn anandd ththee continuacontinuall harassmenharassmentt ttoo whicwhichh iitt wawass subjectesubjectedd IDCIDC offersoffers aa microfichemicrofiche editionedition ofof thethe obligeobligedd EzeEzell ttoo destrodestroyy evereveryy writtewrittenn scrascrapp ooff papepaperr sincsincee ththee contentcontentss coulcouldd havhavee originaoriginall documentdocumentss and publicationspublications divulgedivulgedd informatioinformationn abouaboutt ititss plansplans,, membermemberss anandd activitiesactivities.. FroFromm ththee earlearlyy perioperiodd relatingrelating toto thethe IrgunIrgun ZvaI Zvai 'LeUmi Leumi (Ezel),(Ezel), onlonlyy oneone officialofficial filfilee remains,remains, dateddated July-November,July-November, 1944.1944. ItIt includes:includes: 1313 protocolsprotocols thethe JewishJewish undergroundunderground organizationorganization inin ooff Ezel headquarteheadquarterr meetings,meetings, 2 protocolprotocolss ooff headquarteheadquarterr meetingmeetingss witwithh stafstafff MandatoryMandatory Palestine,Palestine, thatthat existedexisted untiluntil officersofficers,, protocoprotocoll ooff ththee meetinmeetingg betweebetweenn regionaregionall commandercommanderss anandd headquarteheadquarterr ththee establishmenestablishmentt ofof thethe StateState ofof Israel.Israel. officersofficers,, protocoprotocoll ofof thethe meetingmeeting betweenbetween Ezel, JewishJewish AgencyAgency andand HaganaHagana ThThee originaoriginall collectiocollectionn isis housedhoused inin thethe representativesrepresentatives,, andand aa copycopy ofof MenahemMenahem Begin'sBegin's letterletter toto YizhaqYizhaq YezernitzkiYezernitzki JabotinskyJabotinsky Institute,Institute ,Tel-Aviv. Tel-Aviv. TheThe (Shamir),(Shamir), ononee ooff Lehi'Lehi'ss leaders,leaders, dateddated Sept.Sept. 3,3, 1944.1944. TherTheree areare alsoalso somsomee filefiless publisherpublisherss areare gratefulgrateful toto Mr.Mr. PessahPessah dealindealingg withwith thethe lastlast Ezel operationsoperations inin Jaffa,Jaffa, JerusalemJerusalem andand otherother places.places. GanGanyy forfor hihiss cooperationcooperation andand toto thethe InstitutInstitutee diructor,director, Mr.Mr. YehudaYehuda BenarBenarii HoweverHowever,, thertheree iiss a relativelyrelatively largelarge collectioncollection ofof documentsdocuments concerningconcerning Ezel's whowho grantegrantedd usus permissiopermissionn toto makemake thisthis historyhistory andand activitiesactivities housedhoused atat thethe HistoricalHistorical ArchivesArchives ofof thethe JabotinskyJabotinsky Institute,Institute, historihistoricc documentatiodocumentationn availableavailable toto thethe Tel-AvivTel-Aviv.. ThiThiss collectiocollectionn originateoriginatedd witwithh documentdocumentss thathatt werweree eitheeitherr receivereceivedd oorr scholarlscholarlyy public.public. acquiredacquired fromfrom peoplepeople whowho keptkept oror foundfound them.them. ItIt includesincludes surveys,surveys ,memoranda, memoranda, guides, pamphlets and notices, publicity, periodicals and ideological brochures, InIn additionaddition toto thethe periodicalsperiodicals publishedpublished guides, pamphlets and notices, publicity, periodicals and ideological brochures, byby thethe RevisionistRevisionist ZionistZionist movementmovement informatioinformationn andand prespresss cuttingcuttingss oonn operationsoperations,, anandd statementstatementss ooff witnessewitnessess obtaineobtainedd afterafter ththee establishmenestablishmentt ooff ththee StateState.. AltogetherAltogether,, ththee collectiocollectionn containcontainss 333344 filefiless ooff anandd ititss militarmilitaryy arm,arm, Ezel, ththee publisherpublisherss havehave alsoalso includedincluded thethe periodicalsperiodicals ooff whichwhich 121121 werewere chosechosenn foforr microcopyinmicrocopyingg becausbecausee ooff theitheirr researcresearchh valuevalue.. ThougThoughh otherother undergroundunderground organizations,organizations, i.ei.e.. mostmost ooff thethe materialmaterial isis inin Hebrew,Hebrew, therethere isis a sprinklingsprinkling ofof otherother languageslanguages - HaganaHagana andand Lehi,Lehj, inin orderorder toto completecomplete predominantlpredominantlyy EnglishEnglish.. ThThee filefiless chosechosenn foforr copyincopyingg havhavee beebeen.givenn given a seriaseriall thethe historicalhistorical picture.picture. numbernumber whicwhichh appearappearss aatt ththee heaheadd ooff eaceachh microfichmicrofichee anandd iitt iiss undeunderr thithiss seriaserial•l numbernumber thatthat thethe originaloriginal filesfiles cancan bebe foundfound inin thethe Index.Index. IItt musmustt bbee realizerealizedd thathatt Ezel waswas alsalsoo thethe offspringoffspring ofof a vastvast political,political, organizationalorganizational andand educationaeducationall systemsystem whichwhich includeincludedd institutioninstitutionss anandd structurestructuress witwithh branchebranchess iinn Erez-Israel andand thethe Diaspora.Diaspora. TheThe historianhistorian certainlycertainly willwill bebe interestedinterested inin thethe archivesarchives ofof thesethese organizations,organizations, e.g.e.g .Union Union of o fRevisionist Revisionis tZionists Zionists (Ha-Zohar),New New ZionisZionistt Organization,Organization, YouthYouth MovemenMovementt (Betar),(Betar), UnionUnion ofof ZoharZohar andand BetarBetar EmployeesEmployees,, NationaNationall WorkerWorkerss OrganizationOrganization,, "Bri"Britt ha-Biryonim"ha-Biryonim",, etc.etc.;; anandd alsalsoo thosthosee ofof ththee organizationorganizationss establisheestablishedd iinn ththee USAUSA,, includinincludingg ththee CommitteCommitteee foforr a JewisJewishh ArmyArmy,, CommitteCommitteee ttoo savesave EuropeanEuropean Jewry,Jewry, CommitteeCommittee forfor NationalNational Liberation,Liberation, andand thethe AmericaAmericann LeagueLeague forfor aa FreeFree Palestine.Palestine. Pessah Gany, Gany, Jabotinsky Jabotinsk yInstitute, Institute ,Thi Te lAviv Aviv CategorieCategoriess ooff documentdocumentss iinn ththee Ezel ArchivesArchives 1.1. GeneralGeneral 2.2. InternaInternall informationinformation,, commands,commands, instructioninstructionss 3.3. ActionActionss andand operationsoperations duringduring 19371937 - 19431943 4.4. ActionActionss andand operationsoperations fromfrom dayday ofof declarationdeclaration ofof thethe revoltrevolt toto thethe timetime ofof establishmenestablishmentt ofof thethe HebrewHebrew RebellionRebellion MovementMovement (Februar(Februaryy 19441944 -- OctobeOctoberr 1945)1945) 5.5. ActionActionss andand operationsoperations duringduring thethe HebrewHebrew RebellionRebellion MovementMovement (Tenuat(Tenuat HamerHamerii Haivrit)Haivrit) periodperiod (November(November 19451945 -- AugusAugustt 1946)Î946) 66.. ActionActionss andand operationsoperations fromfrom 1St1st SeptemberSeptember 19461946 toto 29th29th NovemberNovember 19471947 7.7. ActionActionss andand operationsoperations afterafter 29th29th NovemberNovember 19471947 88.. ConquesConquestt ooff JaffaJaffa 9;9. Ezel - JerusaleJerusalemm districtdistrict,, 19481948 10.10. ConquestConquest of of Deir-YasinDeir-Yasin villagevillage 1111.. OperationsOperations andand actionsactions -- classifiedclassified chronologicachronologicall lists,lists, reviews,reviews, evidenceevidence etc.etc. 12.12. PamphletsPamphlets && publications publications inin HebrewHebrew 13.13. PostersPosters,, announcementannouncementss andand radioradio broadcastsbroadcasts printedprinted inin HebrewHebrew 14.14. PeriodicalPeriodicalss iinn HebrewHebrew 15.15. PamphletsPamphlets andand publicationspublications inin EnglishEnglish 16.16. MilitarMilitaryy trainingtraining 17.17. RelationRelationss betweebetweenn thethe HaganaHagana andand thethe Ezel 18.18. CasCasee ooff ththee AltalenAltalenaa shipship GeneralGeneral informationinformation NumberNumber ofof fichefiche 191191 SizSizeoffichee of fiche 105x148mm105 χ 148 mm FilmFilm typetype PositivPositivee silversilver halidhalidee ReductionReduction ratioratio VariesVaries accordingaccording toto thethe sizesize ofof thethe originaloriginal InternaInternall Eye-legibleEye-legible headersheaders onon eacheach fichefiche findinfindingg aidaidss ExternaExternall A printeprintedd indexindex (6(6 pp.)pp.) withwith historicalhistorical introductionintroduction byby findinfindingg aidsaids Dr.Dr. YaagobYaagob Shavit,Shavit, Tel Tel AvivAviv UniversityUniversity StoragStoragee TheThe microfichemicrofiche comecome inin aa sturdysturdy plasticplastic binderbinder withwith dustdust covercover OrdeOrderr numbernumber J-28-193/1J-28-193/1 ÖID!IIDCC PUBLISHERSPUBLISHERS VEJ.394.20VEJ.394.2000 no.no. K723K723.
Load more

Recommended publications
  • Down with Britain, Away with Zionism: the 'Canaanites'
    DOWN WITH BRITAIN, AWAY WITH ZIONISM: THE ‘CANAANITES’ AND ‘LOHAMEY HERUT ISRAEL’ BETWEEN TWO ADVERSARIES Roman Vater* ABSTRACT: The imposition of the British Mandate over Palestine in 1922 put the Zionist leadership between a rock and a hard place, between its declared allegiance to the idea of Jewish sovereignty and the necessity of cooperation with a foreign ruler. Eventually, both Labour and Revisionist Zionism accommodated themselves to the new situation and chose a strategic partnership with the British Empire. However, dissident opinions within the Revisionist movement were voiced by a group known as the Maximalist Revisionists from the early 1930s. This article analyzes the intellectual and political development of two Maximalist Revisionists – Yonatan Ratosh and Israel Eldad – tracing their gradual shift to anti-Zionist positions. Some questions raised include: when does opposition to Zionist politics transform into opposition to Zionist ideology, and what are the implications of such a transition for the Israeli political scene after 1948? Introduction The standard narrative of Israel’s journey to independence goes generally as follows: when the British military rule in Palestine was replaced in 1922 with a Mandate of which the purpose was to implement the 1917 Balfour Declaration promising support for a Jewish ‘national home’, the Jewish Yishuv in Palestine gained a powerful protector. In consequence, Zionist politics underwent a serious shift when both the leftist Labour camp, led by David Ben-Gurion (1886-1973), and the rightist Revisionist camp, led by Zeev (Vladimir) Jabotinsky (1880-1940), threw in their lot with Britain. The idea of the ‘covenant between the Empire and the Hebrew state’1 became a paradigm for both camps, which (temporarily) replaced their demand for a Jewish state with the long-term prospect of bringing the Yishuv to qualitative and quantitative supremacy over the Palestinian Arabs under the wings of the British Empire.
    [Show full text]
  • Piety and Mayhem: How Extremist Groups Misuse Religious Doctrine to Condone Violence and Achieve Political Goals
    Ursinus College Digital Commons @ Ursinus College Religious Studies Honors Papers Student Research 5-4-2020 Piety and Mayhem: How Extremist Groups Misuse Religious Doctrine to Condone Violence and Achieve Political Goals Noah Garber Ursinus College, [email protected] Follow this and additional works at: https://digitalcommons.ursinus.edu/rel_hon Part of the Biblical Studies Commons, Buddhist Studies Commons, Ethics in Religion Commons, Islamic Studies Commons, Jewish Studies Commons, Near and Middle Eastern Studies Commons, Peace and Conflict Studies Commons, Religious Thought, Theology and Philosophy of Religion Commons, and the Terrorism Studies Commons Click here to let us know how access to this document benefits ou.y Recommended Citation Garber, Noah, "Piety and Mayhem: How Extremist Groups Misuse Religious Doctrine to Condone Violence and Achieve Political Goals" (2020). Religious Studies Honors Papers. 3. https://digitalcommons.ursinus.edu/rel_hon/3 This Paper is brought to you for free and open access by the Student Research at Digital Commons @ Ursinus College. It has been accepted for inclusion in Religious Studies Honors Papers by an authorized administrator of Digital Commons @ Ursinus College. For more information, please contact [email protected]. Piety and Mayhem: How Extremist Groups Misuse Religious Doctrine to Condone Violence and Achieve Political Goals Noah Garber May 4, 2020 Submitted to the Faculty of Ursinus College in fulfillment of the requirements for Honors in the Departments of Politics and Religious Studies 1 Abstract This thesis examines the way in which various groups have used religion as a justification for violent action towards political ends. From the Irgun, which carried out terrorist acts in Palestine, to the Palestinian Islamist organization Hamas, which has waged war on Israel, to the Buddhist leadership of Myanmar, which has waged a genocidal campaign against Rohingya Muslims living in the country, these groups have employed a narrow interpretation of their religious texts as a means to justify the actions they take.
    [Show full text]
  • Deir Yassin Massacre (1948)
    Document B The 1948 War Deir Yassin Massacre Deir Yassin Massacre (1948) Early in the morning of April 9, 1948, commandos of the Irgun (headed by Menachem Begin) and the Stern Gang attacked Deir Yassin, a village with about 750 Palestinian residents. The village lay outside of the area to be assigned by the United Nations to the Jewish State; it had a peaceful reputation. But it was located on high ground in the corridor between Tel Aviv and Jerusalem. Deir Yassin was slated for occupation under Plan Dalet and the mainstream Jewish defense force, the Haganah, authorized the irregular terrorist forces of the Irgun and the Stern Gang to perform the takeover. In all over 100 men, women, and children were systematically murdered. Fifty-three orphaned children were literally dumped along the wall of the Old City, where they were found by Miss Hind Husseini and brought behind the American Colony Hotel to her home, which was to become the Dar El-Tifl El-Arabi orphanage. (source: http://www.deiryassin.org) Natan Yellin-Mor (Jewish) responded to the massacre: When I remember what led to the massacre of my mother, sister and other members of my family, I can’t accept this massacre. I know that in the heat of battle such things happen, and I know that the people who do these things don’t start out with such things in mind. They kill because their own comrades have being killed and wounded, and they want their revenge at that very moment. But who tells them to be proud of such deeds? (From Eyal naveh and Eli bar-Navi, Modern Times, part 2, page 228) One of the young men of the Deir Yassin village reported what he has been told by his mother: My mother escaped with my two small brothers, one-year old and two-years old.
    [Show full text]
  • Zionist Perspectives from Herzl to Begin Syllabus (PDF)
    Political Zionism and Covenantal Judaism: Zionist Perspectives from Herzl to Begin An Honors First Year Writing Course Throughout its history, two different facets of the Zionist project have either existed in tension with each other, or complemented one another. On the one hand, Israel is, and seeks to be, a flourishing democratic state that makes manifest the modern Jewish right to national self-determination. On the other hand, Zionism has long claimed to represent the covenantal, religious longings of Jews over millennia. The goal of this course is to examine how these two facets of the Zionist project are reflected in the worldview and career of one of the most influential leaders of modern Israel: Menachem Begin. The course will first trace the roots of modern Zionism in general, and Revisionist Zionism in particular, by focusing on the writings of Theodore Herzl and Ze'ev (Vladimir) Jabotinsky. We will then focus on some of the seminal and controversial moments in Begin's life, beginning with those that occurred before his election as Prime Minister: the revolution against the British mandate; the tensions between Begin and Ben- Gurion and the Altalena incident; the debate over whether the nascent State of Israel should accept reparations from Germany; Knesset discussions over the role religion would play in defining the national culture of the state; and the unity cabinet during the Six Day War. The second part of the course will examine moments in Begin's administration that continue to impact Israel today: The peace treaty with Egypt;; the strike against the Iraqi nuclear reactor; and the Lebanon war.
    [Show full text]
  • The Rise of the Zionist Right: Polish Jews and the Betar Youth Movement, 1922-1935
    THE RISE OF THE ZIONIST RIGHT: POLISH JEWS AND THE BETAR YOUTH MOVEMENT, 1922-1935 A DISSERTATION SUBMITTED TO THE DEPARTMENT OF HISTORY AND THE COMMITTEE ON GRADUATE STUDIES OF STANFORD UNIVERSITY IN PARTIAL FULFILLMENT OF THE REQUIREMENTS FOR THE DEGREE OF DOCTOR OF PHILOSOPHY Daniel K. Heller August 2012 © 2012 by Daniel Kupfert Heller. All Rights Reserved. Re-distributed by Stanford University under license with the author. This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution- Noncommercial 3.0 United States License. http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/3.0/us/ This dissertation is online at: http://purl.stanford.edu/bd752jg9919 ii I certify that I have read this dissertation and that, in my opinion, it is fully adequate in scope and quality as a dissertation for the degree of Doctor of Philosophy. Steven Zipperstein, Primary Adviser I certify that I have read this dissertation and that, in my opinion, it is fully adequate in scope and quality as a dissertation for the degree of Doctor of Philosophy. Norman Naimark I certify that I have read this dissertation and that, in my opinion, it is fully adequate in scope and quality as a dissertation for the degree of Doctor of Philosophy. Aron Rodrigue Approved for the Stanford University Committee on Graduate Studies. Patricia J. Gumport, Vice Provost Graduate Education This signature page was generated electronically upon submission of this dissertation in electronic format. An original signed hard copy of the signature page is on file in University Archives. iii ABSTRACT This dissertation charts the social, cultural and intellectual development of the Zionist Right through an examination of the Brit Yosef Trumpeldor youth movement, known eventually by its Hebrew acronym, Betar.
    [Show full text]
  • Pre-IDF Brigades: Haganah, Irgun and Lechi
    Educator’s Guide Pre-IDF Brigades: Haganah, Irgun and Lechi This video tells the fascinating story of three Jewish militias in pre-State Palestine: Haganah, Irgun and Lechi. Before the groups joined forces to become the IDF in 1948, they had major ideological differences. They were all set on the Zionist ideal of creating a Jewish state, but disagreed about how to achieve this goal. Between Ben-Gurion’s diplomatic approach, Begin’s pro-active one, and the Stern Gang’s radicalism, tensions ran high in the 40’s. In this episode, students will consider: What were the key differences between the groups, and how did they put these differences aside to work together? Which of these groups do you identify with most and why? Link to video: https://unpacked.education/video/pre-idf-brigades-haganah-irgun-and-lechi/ Further Reading 1. Daniel Gordis, ​Israel: A Concise History of a Nation Reborn​, Chapter 7 2. Noah Rayman, “Mandatory Palestine: What It Was and Why It Matters” http://time.com/3445003/mandatory-palestine/ 3. The Jewish Agency ​http://www.jewishagency.org/peace-and-conflict/content/23707 Review - Did the students understand the material? 1. Which one of these was NOT a military group in pre-State Israel? a. Lechi b. Irgun c. Haganah © 2019 UNPACKED for Educators All Rights Reserved ​ 1 d. Tzahal 2. What was the key difference between Haganah and Irgun? a. Haganah preferred restraint and diplomacy, while Irgun preferred military force when it believed to be necessary b. Haganah supported the White Paper, while Irgun opposed it c.
    [Show full text]
  • The Balfour Lens
    1 The Balfour Lens Palestine . ​is in constant danger of conflagration. Sparks are flying over its borders all the time and it may be that on some unexpected day a firewill be started that will sweep ruthlessly over this land. — Dispatch from Otis Glazebrook, U.S. consul general in Jerusalem, December 1919 In April 1922, the Foreign Affairs Committee of the U.S. House of Representatives convened a rather remarkable hearing to debate a joint congressional resolution endorsing the Balfour Declaration.1 A little over four years earlier, in November 1917, Britain’s foreign secretary, Arthur Balfour, had put the weight of the British Empire behind the creation of “a national home for the Jewish people” in Palestine, with the stipulation “that nothing shall be done which may prejudice the civil and religious rights of existing non- Jewish communities in Palestine.” Palestine was then part of the crumbling Ottoman Empire; it came under British control following World War I, formalized in 1923 as a League of Nations mandate. As in other parts of the Levant (including Syria), however, Arabs, who then made up more than 90 percent of Palestine’s population, also hoped for in de pen dence. 17 02-3155-9-ch02.indd 17 01/14/19 2:50 pm 18 BLIND SPOT Ten outside witnesses were called to testify at the four- day hearing, including Fuad Shatara and Selim Totah, two Palestine- born U.S. citizens who spoke against the resolution and were the last witnesses to address the committee. “This is our national home, the national home of the Palestinians,” said Shatara, a Brooklyn surgeon and native of Jaffa, “and I think those people are entitled to priority as the national home of the Palestinians and not aliens who have come in and have gradually become a majority.”2 Totah, a young law student originally from Ramallah, attempted a less confrontational approach: “You gentlemen and your forefathers have fought for the idea, and that is taxation with repre sen ta tion.
    [Show full text]
  • Ancient Times the Land That Now Encompasses Israel and The
    A History of the conflict between Palestinians and Israeli’s: Ancient Times--Present Ancient times The land that now encompasses Israel and the Palestinian territories has been conquered and re‐ conquered throughout history. Details of the ancient Israelite states are sketchy, derived for the most part from the first books of the Bible and classical history. Some of the key events include: Biblical times ∙ 1250 BC: Israelites began to conquer and settle the land of Canaan on the eastern Mediterranean coast. ∙ 961‐922 BC: Reign of King Solomon and construction of the Temple in Jerusalem. Solomonʹs reign was followed by the division of the land into two kingdoms. ∙ 586 BC: The southern kingdom, Judah, was conquered by the Babylonians, who drove its people, the Jews, into exile and destroyed Solomonʹs Temple. After 70 years the Jews began to return and Jerusalem and the temple were gradually rebuilt. Classical period ∙ 333 BC: Alexander the Greatʹs conquest brought the area under Greek rule. ∙ 165 BC: A revolt in Judea established the last independent Jewish state of ancient times. ∙ 63 BC: The Jewish state, Judea, was incorporated into the Roman province of Palestine ∙ 70 AD: A revolt against Roman rule was put down by the Emperor Titus and the Second Temple was destroyed. This marks the beginning of the Jewish Diaspora, or dispersion. ∙ 118‐138 AD: During the Roman Emperor Hadrianʹs rule, Jews were initially allowed to return to Jerusalem, but ‐ after another Jewish revolt in 133 ‐ the city was completely destroyed and its people banished and sold into slavery. ∙ 638 AD: Conquest by Arab Muslims ended Byzantine rule (the successor to Roman rule in the East).
    [Show full text]
  • Why the 1947 UN Partition Resolution Must Be Celebrated (Pdf)
    WHY THE 1947 UN PARTITION RESOLUTION MUST BE CELEBRATED https://mosaicmagazine.com/response/2017/11/why-the-1947-un-partition-resolution-must-be-celebrated/ As compared with the festivities surrounding the Balfour Declaration centenary, little attention has been paid to the 70th anniversary of the UN vote. This is a missed opportunity. November 27, 2017 | Martin Kramer This is a response to Who Saved Israel in 1947?, originally published in Mosaic in November 2017 Earlier this month, the governments of Britain and Israel marked the centenary of the Balfour Declaration with much fanfare. From London to Jerusalem, prime ministers, parliamentarians, and protesters weighed in. The world’s major media outlets ran extended analyses, while historians (myself included) enjoyed their fleeting few minutes of fame. In comparison, notice of this week’s 70th Israelis prepare a 2011 ceremony reconstructing anniversary of the 1947 UN partition the celebrations that took place on November 29, resolution, the first international 1947 following passage of the UN partition plan for legitimation of a Jewish state—and the Palestine, which led to the creation of the state of subject of my essay, “Who Saved Israel in Israel. MENAHEM KAHANA/AFP/Getty Images. 1947?”—will be subdued. Why? A centenary is certainly a rarer thing, and the Balfour Declaration makes for dramatic telling. But the vote over the partition resolution had plenty of drama, too, and some of us, or our parents or grandparents, still remember the suspense that attended it and the elation that followed. The Israeli novelist Amos Oz is one of them. In an autobiographical passage, he recalled that night in Jerusalem as his father stroked his head in his darkened bedroom: “From the moment we have our own state [said Oz’s father], you will never be bullied just because you are a Jew and because Jews are so-and-sos.
    [Show full text]
  • Behind the Balfour Declaration
    Behind The Balfour Declaration Diluvial Stanton drills jabberingly, he scent his mohawks very bang. Marius applies inconsiderately while undiversified Jim masculinized variedly or hypersensitised eventually. Uncouth Mel soothes consummately while Corey always vitrify his Eloise spring-cleans downstage, he effaced so disgustedly. Please enter in palestine to, tone was the current lords was the declaration the promises Jews outside Palestine as one of world importance, and that we conceive the Jews to have an historic claim to a home in their ancient land; provided that home can be given them without either dispossessing or oppressing the present inhabitants. It is simply inconceivable that Balfour did not know all this, but was he influenced by it? The selection was much criticized. Jewish people as, and declare to constitute more imperative to its leadership. Full autonomy gave the government the independence it needed to build a legislative foundation system which Canada still stands today. Wilson signaled that balfour mattered because of a national presence of which zionism, but behind it was followed this. Members of the Political Committee were remarkably modest in their claims. Government about a prime minister of the declaration would bring any good. Zionists without explicitly endorsing partition. Arthur balfour declaration was behind. British balfour declaration and declare their identity, this powerful infrastructure and commanders, truman viewed with us. Ottoman leaders realized they must modernize or perish only the hands of Russia or one bar the great European powers. He had behind this declaration did not balfour declaration, zionists in london, i think not. What are savings to funnel of the Balfour Declaration today? Britain suffered in support of the declaration the government about a jewish thought was claimed to.
    [Show full text]
  • Balfour Declaration of 1917
    Background to and Consequences of The Balfour Declaration of 1917 owards the end of the 19th century major changes were taking place in Europe and the Levant (Middle East). These have led to a series of events and Tcircumstances that have most substantially contributed to the continuing conflict in the Eastern Mediterranean region in our present day. Jewish Zionism In 1897, Theodore Herzl, a legally-trained journalist of Jewish parentage, organised the First Zionist Congress in Basel, Switzerland. His motivation he made clear in his book ‘Der Judenstaat’ (The Jewish State): “The Jewish question persists wherever Jews live in appreciable numbers. Wherever it does not exist, it is brought in together with Jewish immigrants. We are naturally drawn into those places where we are not persecuted, and our appearance there gives rise to persecution. This is the case, and will inevitably be so, everywhere, even in highly civilised countries—see, for instance, France—so long as the Jewish question is not solved on the political level." At the time of writing, his views regarding the perceived dangers facing Jewish persons in Europe were perhaps formed – certainly reinforced – by the so-called ‘Dreyfus Affair’. (This scandal, which divided France from 1894 to 1906, took its name from a French Army officer, Captain Alfred Dreyfus. Of Jewish extraction, he was wrongly accused and sentenced to life imprisonment on a fallacious charge of spying on France and passing secret information to Germany.) Following the aforementioned Basel Conference, Herzl wrote in his diary: “In Basel I founded the Jewish State. If I said this aloud today, I would be answered by universal laughter.
    [Show full text]
  • Bowunggreen State Universitylibrary
    I jn HISTORY AND IDEOLOGY IN EXODUS AND OTHER NOVELS M. Muneer S. Asbahi A Dissertation Submitted to the Graduate School of Bowling Green State University in partial fulfillment of the requirements for the degree of DOCTOR OE PHILOSOPHY August 1973 BOWUNG GREEN STATE UNIVERSITY LIBRARY Il ABSTRACT Nine American popular novels that use the Arab-Zionist conflict as a setting were examined in this study with the purpose of determining how objective is the image of the conflict they present. The examination focused on the historical details and the ideological arguments contained in these novels. In order to determine the authenticity of the historical details, they were contrasted with non-fictional historical accounts written by Western, Arab, and Israeli authors. On the other hand, the arguments advanced explicitly or implicitly in the novels were examined to determine the soundness of their historical bases, their logical consistency, their universal applicability, and their fairness in representing the views of the conflicting parties. The study showed that the novels present oversimplified, biased versions of the history of the various developments of the conflict. Due to the omission of certain historical details and the use of others that are highly questionable or definitely inaccurate;; the "history" offered in these novels is unfair to the Arabs. While there is hardly any attempt in the studied novels to represent the Arab point of view, there is an extensive, often zealous, presentation of the Zionist argument. The various arguments advanced to justify the Zionist position, however, are based on the novels’ biased "history" and are characterized by lack of profundity, self-contradiction, and poor logic.
    [Show full text]