DOCSLIB.ORG

IN the MATTER of an AD HOC ARBITRATION PCA No

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text

Load more

IN THE MATTER OF AN AD HOC ARBITRATION PCA No. GOS-SPLM 53,391 PURSUANT TO THE ARBITRATION AGREEMENT IN THE HAGUE, THE NETHERLANDS BETWEEN THE GOVERNMENT OF SUDAN AND THE SUDAN PEOPLE’S LIBERATION MOVEMENT/ARMY THE SUDAN PEOPLE’S LIBERATION MOVEMENT/ARMY MEMORIAL 18 DECEMBER 2008 Table of Contents I. SUMMARY OF ARGUMENT.........................................................................................1 A. The Comprehensive Peace Agreement and Abyei Protocol....................................1 B. The ABC Experts.....................................................................................................2 C. The ABC Experts Did Not Exceed Their Mandate .................................................3 D. The GoS’s Claim that the ABC Experts Exceeded Their Mandate Contradicts Well-Settled Principles of Finality and is Subject to the Most Demanding Standards of Proof....................................................................................................5 E. The GoS has Excluded or Waived Any Rights to Claim that the ABC Experts Exceeded Their Mandate .........................................................................................6 F. If the Tribunal Were to Conclude that the ABC Experts Exceeded Their Mandate, then the “Area of the Nine Ngok Dinka Chiefdoms Transferred to Kordofan in 1905” Encompasses the Territory Extending North from the Current Bahr el Ghazal/Kordofan Boundary to Latitude 10º35’N ..........................7 G. The “Area of the Nine Ngok Dinka Chiefdoms Transferred to Kordofan in 1905” Encompasses All of the Territory Occupied and Used by the Ngok Dinka in 1905...........................................................................................................9 H. Alternatively, an Excess of Mandate by the ABC Experts Does Not Preclude this Tribunal from Relying Upon the Commission’s Determinations...................12 II. THE ABYEI REGION AND THE NGOK DINKA .....................................................13 A. Sudan and the Abyei Region: Geography, Ecology and Climate.........................13 1. Sudan − Generally......................................................................................13 2. The Abyei Region......................................................................................17 B. The Ngok Dinka.....................................................................................................23 1. The Dinka and the Ngok Dinka .................................................................23 2. The Migration of the Ngok Dinka to the Abyei Region ............................24 3. The Ngok Dinka and the Mahdiyya...........................................................26 4. Ngok Dinka Tribal and Social Structure....................................................27 5. Ngok Dinka Religion .................................................................................34 6. Ngok Dinka Land.......................................................................................35 7. Ngok Dinka Cultivation.............................................................................36 8. Ngok Dinka Cattle .....................................................................................39 9. Ngok Dinka Homes and Villages ..............................................................43 C. Peoples Neighboring the Ngok Dinka ...................................................................46 1. The Ngok’s Arab Neighbors – Misseriya ..................................................46 2. The Baggara and the Misseriya..................................................................46 3. Other Dinka and Other Nilotic Tribes (Nuer and Shilluk) ........................54 III. THE ABYEI REGION AND THE NGOK DINKA AT THE BEGINNING OF THE 2OTH CENTURY..............................................................................................57 A. Anglo-Egyptian Condominium in Southern Sudan and the Abyei Area Prior to 1910........................................................................................................................57 1. The Anglo-Egyptian Government’s Administration of Sudan ..................57 2. The Anglo-Egyptian Condominium’s Administration of Bahr el Ghazal and Kordofan Between 1899 and 1910 .........................................59 - i - LONDON 241465v1 3. The Development of Sudanese Provincial Boundaries in the Early 20th Century.......................................................................................................63 4. The Development of Provincial Boundaries Between Bahr el Ghazal and Kordofan in the Early 20th Century.....................................................68 5. The Territory of the Ngok Dinka in 1905..................................................75 6. Transfer of the Ngok Dinka Chiefdoms to Kordofan in 1905...................75 B. The Anglo-Egyptian Condominium’s Administration of Southern Sudan After 1910........................................................................................................................78 1. Governance of the Anglo-Egyptian Condominium Prior to Independence .............................................................................................78 2. Sudanese Independence .............................................................................79 3. Pre-Independence Sudan and the South.....................................................80 IV. NORTH-SOUTH CIVIL WAR IN SOUTHERN SUDAN AND THE ABYEI AREA ................................................................................................................................83 A. North-South Civil War – 1955 to 1972..................................................................83 B. Addis Ababa Accords – 1972 ................................................................................85 C. Tentative Peace in Southern Sudan – 1973 to 1983 ..............................................89 1. The GoS’s Failure to Implement the Addis Ababa Accords .....................89 2. Non-Implementation of the Addis Ababa Accords in Abyei.....................91 D. The GoS’s Dissolution of the Southern Regional Government.............................92 E. Second Civil War: Famine and Destruction in Abyei Area – 1983 to 2005..........93 1. The Second Civil War in the South ...........................................................93 2. The Second Civil War in the Abyei Region ..............................................94 V. THE COMPREHENSIVE PEACE AGREEMENT, THE ABYEI PROTOCOL AND THE ABYEI ANNEX.....................................................................99 A. Negotiations of Comprehensive Peace Agreement..............................................100 1. Machakos Protocol in July 2002..............................................................100 2. Karen Talks in 2003.................................................................................102 B. Negotiations of Abyei Protocol ...........................................................................105 C. The Abyei Protocol-- May 2004..........................................................................107 D. CPA Implementation Modality Abyei Annex - December 2004.........................108 E. Comprehensive Peace Agreement - January 2005...............................................109 VI. THE WORK OF THE ABYEI BOUNDARIES COMMISSION..............................110 A. The ABC’s Activities...........................................................................................110 1. Composition of ABC ...............................................................................110 2. The Procedures of the ABC .....................................................................111 3. The Work of the ABC..............................................................................113 4. The Experts’ Determinations and the ABC Report .................................115 5. The Government of Sudan’s Refusal to Accept the ABC Report ...........119 B. The Abyei Arbitration Agreement.......................................................................121 VII. THE ABC DID NOT EXCEED ITS MANDATE.......................................................123 A. The ABC Experts Fulfilled Their Mandate to Define and Delimit the Abyei Area......................................................................................................................124 1. The ABC Experts’ Mandate Was to “Define and Demarcate the Area of the Nine Ngok Dinka Chiefdoms Transferred to Kordofan in 1905, Referred to Herein as Abyei Area”..........................................................125 2. The Parties Collaboratively Constituted the ABC...................................131 - ii - LONDON 241465v1 3. The ABC Experts and the Parties Collaboratively Implemented the Procedural Steps Set Forth in the Terms of Reference and Rules of Procedure .................................................................................................135 4. The ABC Experts Repeatedly Explained their Understanding of the Parties’ Definition of “Abyei Area,” Without Any Suggestion by the GoS that this Definition Exceeded the ABC’s Mandate or that the ABC Lacked Authority to Adopt this Definition..............................................140 5. The ABC Report Indisputably “Defined and Demarcated the Area of the Nine Ngok Dinka Chiefdoms Transferred to Kordofan in 1905, Referred to herein as Abyei Area”...........................................................144 B. There is No Conceivable Basis for Denying Effect to the ABC Report
Recommended publications
  • Final Draft of the Co-Chairman's Statement

    Final Draft of the Co-Chairman's Statement

    FINAL DRAFT OF THE CO-CHAIRMAN’S STATEMENT Your Excellencies, Honorable Delegates, Distinguished Guests, Ladies and Gentlemen, On behalf of my Co-Chairman, Moulana Abel Alier, my colleagues in the Steering Committee, and on my own behalf, I would like to extend a warm welcome to all of you to this Conference, which marks the final phase of the National Dialogue. This is a historic occasion for us in the National Dialogue and we believe for our country. When His Excellency, President Salva Kiir Mayardit, initiated the National Dialogue more than three years ago, we cannot say with confidence that we, or anyone else for that matter, had a clear idea how long it would take, where it would lead, and what the end result would be. It was initially thought that the Dialogue process would take several months. Many saw it as a ploy by the President to polish his political image. The National Dialogue has now lasted for over three years. And far from being a ploy by the President, it has proved to be a sincere national soul searching about the crises facing our country. 1 What we soon learned as we undertook our assignment, was that our President wanted the process to be absolutely free, inclusive, transparent and credible. He repeatedly reaffirmed that National Dialogue was not a trap or a net for catching his political opponents, and that people should speak freely without fear, harassment or any form of intimidation. And, indeed, through the nationwide grassroots consultations and regional conferences, our people spoke their minds without fear or constraint.
  • The Addis Ababa Agreement on the Problem of South Sudan

    The Addis Ababa Agreement on the Problem of South Sudan

    THE ADDIS ABABA AGREEMENT ON THE PROBLEM OF SOUTH SUDAN Draft Organic Law to organize Regional Self-Government in the Southern provinces of the Democratic Republic of the Sudan In accordance with the provisions of the Constitution of the Democratic Republic of the Sudan and in realization of the memorable May Revolution Declaration of June 9, 1969, granting the Southern Provinces of the Sudan Regional Self-Government within a united socialist Sudan, and in accordance with the principle of the May Revolution that the Sudanese people participate actively in and supervise the decentralized system of the government of their country, it is hereunder enacted: Article 1. This law shall be called the law for Regional Self-Government in the Southern Provinces. It shall come into force and a date within a period not exceeding thirty days from the date of Addis Ababa Agreement. Article 2. This law shall be issued as an organic law which cannot be amended except by a three- quarters majority of the People’s National Assembly and confirmed by a two-thirds majority in a referendum held in the three Southern Provinces of the Sudan. CHAPTER I: DEFINITIONS Article 3. a) ‘Constitution’ refers to the Republican Order No. 5 or any other basic law replacing or amending it. b) ‘President’ means the president of the Democratic Republic of the Sudan. c) ‘Southern Provinces of the Sudan’ means the Provinces of Bahr El Ghazal, Equatoria and Upper Nile in accordance with their boundaries as they stood January 1, 1956, and other areas that were culturally and geographically a part of the Southern Complex as may be decided by a referendum.
  • Warrap State SOUTH SUDAN

    Warrap State SOUTH SUDAN

    COMMUNITY CONSULTATION REPORT Warrap State SOUTH SUDAN Bureau for Community Security South Sudan Peace and Small Arms Control and Reconciliation Commission United Nations Development Programme The Bureau for Community Security and Small Arms Control under the Ministry of Interior is the Gov- ernment agency of South Sudan mandated to address the threats posed by the proliferation of small arms and community insecurity to peace and development. The South Sudan Peace and Reconciliation Commission is mandated to promote peaceful co-existence amongst the people of South Sudan and advise the Government on matters related to peace. The United Nations Development Programme in South Sudan, through the Community Security and Arms Control Project supports the Bureau strengthen its capacity in the area of community security and arms control at the national, state, and county levels. Cover photo: © UNDP/Sun-Ra Lambert Baj COMMUNITY CONSULTATION REPORT Warrap State South Sudan Published by South Sudan Bureau for Community Security and Small Arms Control South Sudan Peace and Reconciliation Commission United Nations Development Programme MAY 2012 JUBA, SOUTH SUDAN CONTENTS Acronyms ........................................................................................................................... i Foreword ........................................................................................................................... .ii Executive Summary .........................................................................................................
  • Nomads' Settlement in Sudan: Experiences, Lessons and Future Action

    Nomads' Settlement in Sudan: Experiences, Lessons and Future Action

    Nomads’ Settlement in Sudan: Experiences, Lessons and Future action (STUDY 1) Copyright © 2006 By the United Nations Development Programme in Sudan House 7, Block 5, Avenue P.O. Box: 913 Khartoum, Sudan. All rights reserved. No part of this publication may be reproduced, stored in a retreival system or transmitted, in any form or by any means, electronical, mechanical, photocopying, recording or otherwise, without prior permission. Printed by SCPP Editor: Ms: Angela Stephen Available through: United Nations Development Programme in Sudan House 7, Block 5, Avenue P.O. Box: 913 Khartoum, Sudan. www.sd.undp.org The analysis and policy recommendations expressed in this publication do not necessarily reflect the views of the United Nations, including UNDP, its Executive Board or Member States. This study is the work of an independent team of authors sponsored by the Reduction of Resource Based Conflcit Project, which is supported by the United Nations Development Programme and partners. Contributing Authors The Core Team of researchers for this report comprised of: 1. Professor Mohamed Osman El Sammani, Former Professor of Geography, University of Khartoum, Team leader, Principal Investigator, and acted as the Report Task Coordinator. 2. Dr. Ali Abdel Aziz Salih, Ph.D. in Agricultural Economics, Faculty of Agriculture, University of Khartoum. Preface Competition over natural resources, especially land, has become an issue of major concern and cause of conflict among the pastoral and farming populations of the Sahel and the Horn of Africa. Sudan, where pastoralists still constitute more than 20 percent of the population, is no exception. Raids and skirmishes among pastoral communities in rural Sudan have escalated over the recent years.
  • Power and Proximity: the Politics of State Secession

    Power and Proximity: the Politics of State Secession

    City University of New York (CUNY) CUNY Academic Works All Dissertations, Theses, and Capstone Projects Dissertations, Theses, and Capstone Projects 9-2016 Power and Proximity: The Politics of State Secession Elizabeth A. Nelson The Graduate Center, City University of New York How does access to this work benefit ou?y Let us know! More information about this work at: https://academicworks.cuny.edu/gc_etds/1396 Discover additional works at: https://academicworks.cuny.edu This work is made publicly available by the City University of New York (CUNY). Contact: [email protected] POWER AND PROXIMITY: THE POLITICS OF STATE SECESSION by ELIZABETH A. NELSON A dissertation submitted to the Graduate Faculty in Political Science in partial fulfillment of the requirements for the degree of Doctor of Philosophy, The City University of New York 2016 © 2016 ELIZABETH A. NELSON All Rights Reserved ii Power and Proximity: The Politics of State Secession by Elizabeth A. Nelson This manuscript has been read and accepted for the Graduate Faculty in Political Science in satisfaction of the dissertation requirement for the degree of Doctor of Philosophy. ______________ ____________________________________ Date Susan L. Woodward Chair of Examining Committee ______________ ____________________________________ Date Alyson Cole Executive Officer Supervisory Committee: Professor Susan L. Woodward Professor Peter Liberman Professor Bruce Cronin THE CITY UNIVERSITY OF NEW YORK iii ABSTRACT Power and Proximity: The Politics of State Secession by Elizabeth A. Nelson Advisor: Susan L. Woodward State secession is a rare occurrence in the international system. While a number of movements seek secession, the majority fail to achieve statehood. Of the exceptional successes, many have not had the strongest claims to statehood; some of these new states look far less like states than some that have failed.
  • The Training of the Upper Nile

    The Training of the Upper Nile

    THE TRAINING OF THE UPPER NILE I PUBLISHED BY PITMAN WATER SUPPLY PROBLEMS AND DEVELOPMENTS By W. H. MAXWELL, A.M.Inst.C.E., Chartered Civil Engineer, Formerly Borough and Waterworks Engineer, Tunbridge Wells Corporation. In demy 8vo, cloth gilt, 337 pp., illustrated. 25s. net. WATERWORKS FOR URBAN AND RURAL DISTRICTS By HBNB-T C. ADAMS, M.Inst.C.E., M.I.M.E., F.S.I. In demy 8vo, 246 pp.* with 111 illustrations and 3 folding plates. 15s. net. RIVER WORK CONSTRUCTIONAL DETAILS By H. C. H. SHENTON, F.S.E., M.Inat.M. and Cy. E., F.R.San.I., F.R.San.E., and F. E. H. SHBNTON, M.S.E. In demy 8vo, cloth gilt, 146 pp. 12s. 6d. net. HYDRAULICS FOR ENGINEERS By ROBERT W. ANGUS, B.A.SC, M.E. In demy 8vo, cloth gilt, 336 pp. 12s. 6d. net. REINFORCED CONCRETE ARCH DESIGN By G. P. MANNING, M.Eng., A.M.Inst.C.E. In demy 8vo, cloth gilt, 200 pp. 18s. 6d. net. Sir Isaac Pitman & Sons, Ltd. Parker St. Kingsway, London, W.C.2 THE TRAINING OF THE UPPER NILE BY F. NEWHOUSE B.Sc, F .C.G.I., M.INST.C.E. Late Inspector-General of Egyptian Irrigation in the Sudan PUBLISHED IN OOLLABOBATION WITH THE INSTITUTION OF CIVIL ENGINEERS LONDON SIR ISAAC PITMAN & SONS, LTD. 1939 SIR ISAAC PITMAN & SONS, LTD. PITMAN HOUSE, PARKER STREET, KINGSWAY, LONDON, W.C.2 THE PITMAN PRESS, BATH PITMAN HOUSE, LITTLE COLLINS STREET, MELBOURNE ASSOCIATED COMPANIES PITMAN PUBLISHING CORPORATION 2 WEST 45TH STREET, NEW YORK 2O5 WEST MONROE STREET, CHICAGO SIR ISAAC PITMAN & SONS (CANADA), LTD.
  • Partner Presence and Interventions in Warrap State A14062012-1

    Partner Presence and Interventions in Warrap State A14062012-1

    FSL Cluster Partner Presence and Interventions in Warrap State A14062012-1 27°0'0"E 30°0'0"E Disclaimer The boundaries and and names shown and the designations used on this map do not Abyei imply offical endorsement or acceptance by the United Nations or the Government U of South Sudan. For any comment please contact: F S L - c l u st e r- s s d @ fa o . o r g n it Data sources y H! * Administrative boundaries were obtained courtesy of IMU OCHA; State capitals * Kind of interventions are provided by FSL Cluster partners ! H Undetermined boundary 13 Bentiu Twic Primary roads N N " " 0 0 ' Secondary roads ' 0 0 ° ° 9 l 9 za ha Gogrial East Tertiary roads l G r e ah Rivers B ern H! rth Abyei administrative area No Aweil t s International boundary e 6 11 Warrap W l South Sudan states a i 8 r g South Sudan counties J o o G n Waterbg ody/marsh l H! Tonj North e Kuajok Grazingi areas Type of intervention Food assistance and livestock interventions Tonj East Food assistance, livestock, income & employment, value addition/markets, and Intervening Partners' by County H! 5 agriculture interventions County Livestock Gogrial East FAO, VSF Suisse Wau Gogrial West FAO, VSF Suisse * Figures indicate number of partners Tonj East VSF Belgium, FAO, VSF Suisse Tonj North VSF Belgium, FAO, VSF Suisse Tonj South FAO, VSF Suisse Scale 1: 665,360 Twic FAO, VSF Suisse 7 Map Paper Size: A1 ¬ Map created: June 2012 County Income/Employment Value Addition/Markets Gogrial East FAO, VSF Germany VSF Germany Gogrial West NRC, FAO, NPA FAO Sudan Tonj East Tonj South
  • Space, Home and Racial Meaning Making in Post Independence Juba

    Space, Home and Racial Meaning Making in Post Independence Juba

    UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA Los Angeles The Worldliness of South Sudan: Space, Home and Racial Meaning Making in Post Independence Juba A thesis submitted in partial satisfaction of the requirement for the degree of Master of Arts in Anthropology By Zachary Mondesire 2018 © Copyright by Zachary Mondesire 2018 ABSTRACT OF THE THESIS The Worldliness of South Sudan: Space, Home and Racial Meaning Making in Post Independence Juba By Zachary Mondesire Master of Art in Anthropology University of California, Los Angeles, 2017 Professor Hannah C. Appel, Chair The world’s newest state, South Sudan, became independent in July 2011. In 2013, after the outbreak of the still-ongoing South Sudanese civil war, the UNHCR declared a refugee crisis and continues to document the displacement of millions of South Sudanese citizens. In 2016, Crazy Fox, a popular South Sudanese musician, released a song entitled “Ana Gaid/I am staying.” His song compels us to pay attention to those in South Sudan who have chosen to stay, or to return and still other African regionals from neighboring countries to arrive. The goal of this thesis is to explore the “Crown Lodge,” a hotel in Juba, the capital city of South Sudan, as one such site of arrival, return, and staying put. Paying ethnographic attention to site enables us to think through forms of spatial belonging in and around the hotel that attached racial meaning to national origin and regional identity. ii The thesis of Zachary C. P. Mondesire is approved. Jemima Pierre Aomar Boum Hannah C. Appel, Committee Chair University
  • United States Institute of Peace Association for Diplomatic Studies and Training Sudan Experience Project

    United States Institute of Peace Association for Diplomatic Studies and Training Sudan Experience Project

    United States Institute of Peace Association for Diplomatic Studies and Training Sudan Experience Project Interview # 19 - Executive Summary Interviewed by: Haven North Initial Interview Date: August 22, 2006 Copyright 2006 USIP & ADST The Interviewee was a high-ranking U.S. official assigned to Sudan from 1992- 95. During this time, the war between the North and the South was being “prosecuted in a brutal way” and “relief operations were being interrupted.” The U.S. “representations or charges (to both sides) were considered by both Governments “without foundation.” Therefore, “the U.S. policy was one of denouncing the excesses of the Sudanese Government, and denouncing their policies such as giving aid and refuge to terrorist organizations.” The Sudanese Government denied these charges, but came to the table to end the rebellion in the South and forge better relations with the West and the U.S. The Clinton Administration was “not as supportive of the SPLA,” but supported the IGAD, even though we did not participate in the negotiations. Former U.S. Ambassadors to Sudan Petterson and Kontos, as a private initiative, met with government and non-government representatives of the North and South. Their conclusion was that, as long as the was going on, there could be no improvement in relations with the U.S., in Sudan’s economy, or in reducing repression and human rights violations. Their recommendations were that the “U.S. should take a direct and important part in an international effort to end the war between the North and South… and reestablish a diplomatic presence. ” These recommendations were rejected by the Clinton Administration.
  • Sudan Law Reform Advocacy Briefing

    Sudan Law Reform Advocacy Briefing

    Sudan Law Reform Advocacy Briefing January 2014 Welcome to the fourth issue of the Sudan Law Reform Advocacy Briefing.1 This Briefing is published quarterly to highlight and reflect on law reform developments and issues critical to the promotion and protection of human rights in Sudan. Its aim is to inform and engage those working on, and interested in, law reform and human rights in Sudan. The present issue contains an annotated compilation of key recommendations made by regional and international human rights bodies, as well as states during the Universal Periodic Review process, and, in so far as available, responses by Sudan thereto. It focuses on legislative reforms, particularly in relation to serious human rights violations. This issue seeks to provide a useful reference document for all actors concerned and to identify priority areas for engagement, particularly in the context of the pending review of Sudan’s state party report by the UN Human Rights Committee. Yours, Lutz Oette For further information, please visit our dedicated project website at www.pclrs.org/ Please contact Lutz Oette (REDRESS) at [email protected] (Tel +44 20 77931777) if you wish to share information or submit your comments for consideration, or if you do not wish to receive any further issues of the advocacy briefing. 1 The Advocacy Briefings are available online at: http://www.pclrs.org/english/updates. 1 I. The implementation of international human rights treaty obligations, legislative reforms and effective protection of rights in Sudan: International perspectives and Sudan’s responses in context 1. Introduction The question of human rights in Sudan has engaged a large number of regional and international bodies.
  • Constitution – Making in the Sudan: Past Experiences

    Constitution – Making in the Sudan: Past Experiences

    Constitution – Making in the Sudan: Past Experiences Prof. Ali Suleiman Fadlall A paper presented at the Constitution­making Forum: A Government of Sudan Consultation 24­25 May 2011 Khartoum, Sudan With support from Advisory Council for Human Rights 1 Introduction: In 1978, upon my return to Sudan from Nigeria, I found that one of my predecessors at the Faculty of Law, University of Khartoum, had set up a question in constitutional law for the first year students asking them to comment on the following statement: “Since the time of the Mahdi, the history of the Sudan has been a history of a country in search for a constitution.” In 1986, I contributed a chapter on constitutional development in the Sudan to a book of essays on the politics of the country, published under the title of Sudan Since Independence. The editors, and myself chose for my easy the heading of “The Search for a Constitution”. Now, a quarter of a century later, and more than fifty years since the country became independent, it seems that that perennial search for a constitution has not, yet, been successful concluded. In this brief essay, I intend to look at past endeavors in constitution making in this country. It is just possible that previous constitutional making processes may have been so flawed, that the structure that they thought to build could not withstand the test of time. Hence; they always came crumbling down. In some cases, some of these structures were not even finished. Constitution­Making: Constitutions can be created through different methods and devices.
  • Map of South Sudan

    Map of South Sudan

    UNITED NATIONS SOUTH SUDAN Geospatial 25°E 30°E 35°E Nyala Ed Renk Damazin Al-Fula Ed Da'ein Kadugli SUDAN Umm Barbit Kaka Paloich Ba 10°N h Junguls r Kodok Āsosa 10°N a Radom l-A Riangnom UPPER NILEBoing rab Abyei Fagwir Malakal Mayom Bentiu Abwong ^! War-Awar Daga Post Malek Kan S Wang ob Wun Rog Fangak at o Gossinga NORTHERN Aweil Kai Kigille Gogrial Nasser Raga BAHR-EL-GHAZAL WARRAP Gumbiel f a r a Waat Leer Z Kuacjok Akop Fathai z e Gambēla Adok r Madeir h UNITY a B Duk Fadiat Deim Zubeir Bisellia Bir Di Akobo WESTERN Wau ETHIOPIA Tonj Atum W JONGLEI BAHR-EL-GHAZAL Wakela h i te LAKES N Kongor CENTRAL Rafili ile Peper Bo River Post Jonglei Pibor Akelo Rumbek mo Akot Yirol Ukwaa O AFRICAN P i Lol b o Bor r Towot REPUBLIC Khogali Pap Boli Malek Mvolo Lowelli Jerbar ^! National capital Obo Tambura Amadi WESTERN Terakeka Administrative capital Li Yubu Lanya EASTERN Town, village EQUATORIAMadreggi o Airport Ezo EQUATORIA 5°N Maridi International boundary ^! Juba Lafon Kapoeta 5°N Undetermined boundary Yambio CENTRAL State (wilayah) boundary EQUATORIA Torit Abyei region Nagishot DEMOCRATIC Roue L. Turkana Main road (L. Rudolf) Railway REPUBLIC OF THE Kajo Yei Opari Lofusa 0 100 200km Keji KENYA o o o o o o o o o o o o o o o o o o o o o o o o o 0 50 100mi CONGO o e The boundaries and names shown and the designations used on this map do not imply official endorsement or acceptance by the United Nations.