DOCSLIB.ORG

Berry Dissertation Reformatted 11.Pages

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Berry Dissertation Reformatted 11.Pages THE UNIVERSITY OF CHICAGO THE DIVIDED SKEPTIC: SAMUEL BECKETT’S PARODY AND STANLEY CAVELL’S INTERPRETATION OF PHILOSOPHICAL SKEPTICISM A DISSERTATION SUBMITTED TO THE FACULTY OF THE DIVISION OF THE HUMANITIES IN CANDIDACY FOR THE DEGREE OF DOCTOR OF PHILOSOPHY DEPARTMENT OF COMPARATIVE LITERATURE BY BRIAN JOHN DOMINGUEZ BERRY CHICAGO, ILLINOIS MARCH 2017 Copyright © 2017 by Brian Berry All rights reserved To the memory of Kaila Brown. CONTENTS ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS ……………………………………………………………………………….v INTRODUCTION………………………………………………………………………………………….1 CHAPTER 1: THE UNAVOIDABILITY OF MEANING IN ENDGAME: THE IMPASSE BETWEEN SKEPTICISM AND ORDINARY LANGUAGE…………………………………………………………16 CHAPTER 2: THE UNNAMABLE’S PARODY OF THE SKEPTICAL RECITAL: CONFOUNDING THE CATEGORIES OF SKEPTICISM ………………………………………………………………….54 CHAPTER 3: THE FLIGHT FROM HUMANITY AND THE FAILED FANTASY OF A NEW FORM OF LIFE IN HOW IT IS………………………………………………………………………………..….94 REFERENCES…………………………………………………………………………………………..133 !iv ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS This project would not have been possible without the continued help and support of my committee. My chair, Loren Kruger, has not only provided invaluable feedback on my ideas, but has also augmented my drive to finish this task. I would also like to thank my committee members, John Muse and Alison James, whose specializations supplement a lack in my own. I am grateful that they were willing to help in a project such as this that borrows freely from different disciplines. A special thanks to my colleagues in the Department of Comparative Literature, particularly Monica Felix, Stephen Parkin, Mollie McFee, Chloe Blackshear, and Nana Holtsnider for their intellectual and emotional support. I would also like to thank the Mellon Foundation for their financial support through a dissertation completion fellowship. !v INTRODUCTION Samuel Beckett famously claims, in a 1961 interview with Tom Driver, that he is “not a philosopher,” and when asked about similarities between his texts and those of contemporary philosophers, he adds that “their language is too philosophical for me” (23). This response can seem surprising, since Beckett’s texts clearly invoke philosophy, particularly philosophical skepticism, a tradition in the west that denies the possibility of our knowledge of the world and of other people. His plays and novels paint a picture of human debility wherein the characters are radically uncertain of the things and people they encounter. Beckett’s attempt to distance himself from philosophy might be a humble admission of a lack of philosophical competence, or a red herring to throw off critics—these are both viable options. But I would suggest that Beckett’s attitude toward philosophical skepticism is fundamentally ambivalent: the problem of skepticism fascinates him, but he ultimately designates skeptical thought and speech as “too philosophical,” something to be abandoned. Beckett’s texts present us with a divided skeptic, a figure I am deriving from Stanley Cavell’s analysis of the skeptical tradition. Cavell notices how skeptical texts invite the reader to imagine the philosopher’s context, wherein they confront an object and deliver a skeptical recital, providing an argument for doubt in this particular context. The skeptic is divided because their context and the doubt it inspires seem both unavoidable and unnatural, since they ultimately return to ordinary life and language. Beckett’s texts parody skepticism, providing us with characters who take it perhaps too seriously, and end up seeming ridiculous, but not entirely the object of scorn. !1 The object of Beckett’s parody is specifically the tradition of philosophical skepticism that originates with Descartes’s radical doubt of the existence of the material world. Here we must distinguish two senses of ‘skepticism.’ The more general sense of ‘skepticism’ is synonymous with ‘doubt,’ say, skepticism of climate change. Cartesian skepticism is more specifically philosophical skepticism, where reality or existence are in question, requiring a different path of argument than ordinary doubt. Beginning in a state of philosophical skepticism, Descartes invokes his famous cogito and his ontological argument for the existence of God in order to re-assert his belief in the existence of the material world. His method of universal doubt should ideally lead to universal conviction of the form: ‘if I know anything, I know this.’ The resulting conviction is stronger and purer than any ordinary belief, and is thus qualitatively different (a philosophical conviction in response to philosophical skepticism). Descartes’s conclusion, even though it is markedly anti-skeptical, remains within the purview of the skeptical tradition because it begins with a strange universal doubt. Although Beckett’s texts demonstrably engage with Descartes, they do not produce a straightforward argument to either prove or disprove him—we cannot label him as either a skeptic or an anti-skeptic. Edouard Morot-Sir claims that “if there is recurrent in [Beckett’s] writings use of Cartesian behavior, objects and semantics, it is not for Cartesian purposes” (Morot-Sir 38). Beckett parodies philosophy in the sense that the philosophical material he incorporates is not meant to assuage philosophical doubts. Morot-Sir furthermore attempts to motivate the parody: !2 Beckett condemns any form of literature which even implicitly accepts the possibility of a truth-language…. Scepticism is no solution, for it fails to transcend the duality true- untrue…. And so comes Beckett’s decision to put things at their worst: to continue to use philosophical language (vocabulary and patterns), since this is inevitable, but at the same time to deny its claim of conferring any truth-value upon its affirmations or negations. (Morot-Sir 93, 95, and 96) While I agree that Beckett’s literary texts challenge truth-language, I find that skepticism challenges truth-language more than Morot-Sir gives it credit, which is why Beckett is not simply a skeptic or anti-skeptic. If we often think of ordinary language as the medium of truth,1 the premises of skepticism contradict ordinary beliefs without definitively showing them to be false, thus complicating the true/false distinction. Or rather, we might say that philosophical claims are true or false in a qualitatively different sense than non-philosophical (ordinary) claims. Skeptical language is already a parody of ordinary language, and Beckett’s texts are a parody of a parody. Beckett’s literary texts engage with philosophical skepticism at a further remove and play with philosophical language in ways that philosophical texts could not. Descartes speaks in his texts in the first person, and we would ascribe the claims made to the author himself, assuming that he would stand by them as true. However, he also makes himself a kind of character, the protagonist of his meditations, and as he invites us to imagine ourselves in his position, in a 1 I qualify this phrase because J.L. Austin’s version of ordinary language philosophy also wants to go beyond the true-false model of language, what he calls the “descriptive fallacy” (cf. How To Do Things with Words 3 and 100). However, as contemporary French philosopher Sandra Laugier notes, the destruction of the true-false fetish “does not mean abandoning the concept or criterion of truth; it means enlarging it, extending it outside of the domain of ‘description’” (Why We Need Ordinary Language Philosophy 100). !3 nightgown by the fire, he also questions the status of the speaking ‘I’.2 We cannot safely ascribe the claims that Beckett’s characters make to the author himself, and yet we are sometimes invited to do so, or at least question the status of the Beckettian ‘I.’ In an early short story, “First Love,” the narrator claims, “I have always spoken, no doubt always shall, of things that never existed, or that existed if you insist, no doubt always will, but not with the existence I ascribe to them” (35). This line makes sense attributed to the narrator, in the context of his other skeptical remarks. But it also makes sense attributed to Beckett, as either his own skeptical remark, or as a reflection on his writing as a literary author. The humor of the line depends upon a literary sense of ‘exist’ wherein we think of Beckett as an author whose vocation is to speak of things that do not exist as if they did. We might take the narrator of the story to be speaking either as a literary author himself, or as an amateurish philosopher, since philosophers also use ‘exist’ in strange ways. As its main contribution to the tradition, ordinary language philosophy (OLP) brings out the strangeness of skeptical language, particularly the use of ‘real’ or ‘exists.’ OLP invites us to imagine a context in which a claim might be made, and it turns out that we need very special reasons for asking if something is real or if something exists. For instance, I might ask, ‘Is this table real?’ if I were visiting a friend who programs convincing holograms, or who makes tables that are designed to collapse. The ordinary use of inquiring about existence or reality occurs only in a context in which there is a very specific reason for suspicion. Since the skeptic’s doubt and Beckett’s narrator’s doubt do not emerge in this kind of context, it is clear that they depart from ordinary usage. Stanley Cavell enters the OLP/skepticism debate as something of an arbiter: he 2 In the Second Meditation he admits, “I do not yet have a sufficient understanding of what this ‘I’ is” (Descartes 17). !4 concedes that the skeptic’s language is extraordinary (departs from the ordinary) but adds that they cannot help it—extraordinary doubt and language seem unavoidable to the skeptic however much they might wish to avoid them. Cavell’s OLP-inspired insight helps us understand both why Beckett would deny being a philosopher, and why his texts seem philosophical anyway. On the one hand, neither Beckett nor his characters share the skeptic’s exact context.
Load more

Recommended publications
  • Samuel Beckett's Peristaltic Modernism, 1932-1958 Adam
    ‘FIRST DIRTY, THEN MAKE CLEAN’: SAMUEL BECKETT’S PERISTALTIC MODERNISM, 1932-1958 ADAM MICHAEL WINSTANLEY PhD THE UNIVERSITY OF YORK DEPARTMENT OF ENGLISH AND RELATED LITERATURE MARCH 2013 1 ABSTRACT Drawing together a number of different recent approaches to Samuel Beckett’s studies, this thesis examines the convulsive narrative trajectories of Beckett’s prose works from Dream of Fair to Middling Women (1931-2) to The Unnamable (1958) in relation to the disorganised muscular contractions of peristalsis. Peristalsis is understood here, however, not merely as a digestive process, as the ‘propulsive movement of the gastrointestinal tract and other tubular organs’, but as the ‘coordinated waves of contraction and relaxation of the circular muscle’ (OED). Accordingly, this thesis reconciles a number of recent approaches to Beckett studies by combining textual, phenomenological and cultural concerns with a detailed account of Beckett’s own familiarity with early twentieth-century medical and psychoanalytical discourses. It examines the extent to which these discourses find a parallel in his work’s corporeal conception of the linguistic and narrative process, where the convolutions, disavowals and disjunctions that function at the level of narrative and syntax are persistently equated with medical ailments, autonomous reflexes and bodily emissions. Tracing this interest to his early work, the first chapter focuses upon the masturbatory trope of ‘dehiscence’ in Dream of Fair to Middling Women, while the second examines cardiovascular complaints in Murphy (1935-6). The third chapter considers the role that linguistic constipation plays in Watt (1941-5), while the fourth chapter focuses upon peristalsis and rumination in Molloy (1947). The penultimate chapter examines the significance of epilepsy, dilation and parturition in the ‘throes’ that dominate Malone Dies (1954-5), whereas the final chapter evaluates the significance of contamination and respiration in The Unnamable (1957-8).
    [Show full text]
  • The Evocation of the Physical, Metaphysical, and Sonic Landscapes in Samuel Beckett's Short Dramatic Works
    Trinity College Trinity College Digital Repository Senior Theses and Projects Student Scholarship Spring 2012 The Evocation of the Physical, Metaphysical, and Sonic Landscapes in Samuel Beckett's Short Dramatic Works Theresa A. Incampo Trinity College, [email protected] Follow this and additional works at: https://digitalrepository.trincoll.edu/theses Part of the Dramatic Literature, Criticism and Theory Commons, Performance Studies Commons, and the Theatre History Commons Recommended Citation Incampo, Theresa A., "The Evocation of the Physical, Metaphysical, and Sonic Landscapes in Samuel Beckett's Short Dramatic Works". Senior Theses, Trinity College, Hartford, CT 2012. Trinity College Digital Repository, https://digitalrepository.trincoll.edu/theses/209 The Evocation of the Physical, Metaphysical and Sonic Landscapes within the Short Dramatic Works of Samuel Beckett Submitted by Theresa A. Incampo May 4, 2012 Trinity College Department of Theater and Dance Hartford, CT 2 Table of Contents Acknowledgements 5 I: History Time, Space and Sound in Beckett’s short dramatic works 7 A historical analysis of the playwright’s theatrical spaces including the concept of temporality, which is central to the subsequent elements within the physical, metaphysical and sonic landscapes. These landscapes are constructed from physical space, object, light, and sound, so as to create a finite representation of an expansive, infinite world as it is perceived by Beckett’s characters.. II: Theory Phenomenology and the conscious experience of existence 59 The choice to focus on the philosophy of phenomenology centers on the notion that these short dramatic works present the theatrical landscape as the conscious character perceives it to be. The perceptual experience is explained by Maurice Merleau-Ponty as the relationship between the body and the world and the way as to which the self-limited interior space of the mind interacts with the limitless exterior space that surrounds it.
    [Show full text]
  • Trauma, Company and Witnessing in Samuel Beckett's Post-War Drama
    TRAUMA, COMPANY AND WITNESSING IN SAMUEL BECKETT’S POST-WAR DRAMA, 1952-61 A thesis submitted to The University of Manchester for the degree of Doctor of Philosophy in the Faculty of Humanities 2014 ELECTRA GEORGIADES SCHOOL OF ARTS, LANGUAGES AND CULTURES 2 LIST OF CONTENTS Abstract 3 Declaration 4 Copyright Statement 5 Acknowledgements 6 1. Introduction 7 1.1. Beckett and Trauma: The Theoretical Framework 12 1.2. Performing Testimony 25 1.3. Human Company: The Other as a Witness 36 1.4. Thesis Structure 41 2. In Need of a Witness: Beckett’s Testimonial Drama (1952-61) 45 2.1. Trauma, Testimony and the Theatre 48 2.2. Beside History: Beckett’s Testimonial Drama 66 2.2.1 Performing Trauma 69 2.2.2 Performing and Responding to Testimony 86 3. Acting out the Trauma: Memory, Language and the Body 99 3.1. Memory 109 3.2. Language 133 3.3. The Body 142 4. Reclaiming Witnessing in the Post-war Period: Human Company in Beckett’s Drama Trilogy 158 4.1. Human Company and Trauma 161 4.2. Resisting the Trauma: Company and Witnessing 189 5. Conclusion: Trauma, Company and Witnessing in Samuel Beckett’s Post-war Drama 205 5.1. Beckett and Trauma 208 5.2. The Human Other 212 Bibliography 217 Primary Sources 217 Secondary Sources 218 Words: 80,551 3 ABSTRACT The present thesis examines the interrelation between the dynamics of human company and the psychoanalytic concept of witnessing in Samuel Beckett’s major post-war drama. The analysis provided concentrates primarily on Waiting for Godot (1952), Endgame (1957), and Happy Days (1962) and situates these plays within a post-war framework, while examining their stylistic qualities and thematic concerns within the context of trauma studies.
    [Show full text]
  • Travels with Samuel Beckett, 1928-1946
    Beyond the Cartesian Pale: Travels with Samuel Beckett, 1928-1946 Charles Travis [I]t is the act and not the object of perception that matters. Samuel Beckett, “Recent Irish Poetry,” e Bookman (1934).1 Introduction he Irish Nobel laureate Samuel Beckett’s (1902-1989) early writings of the 1930s and 1940s depict the cities of Dublin, London and Saint-Lô Tin post-war France, with affective, comedic and existential flourishes, respectively. These early works, besides reflecting the experience of Beckett’s travels through interwar Europe, illustrate a shift in his literary perspective from a latent Cartesian verisimilitude to a more phenomenological, frag- mented and dissolute impression of place. This evolution in Beckett’s writing style exemplifies a wider transformation in perception and thought rooted in epistemological, cultural and philosophical trends associated with the Conti- nental avant garde emerging in the wake of the fin de siècle. As Henri Lefeb- vre has noted: Around 1910, the main reference systems of social practice in Eu- rope disintegrated and even collapsed. What had seemed estab- lished for good during the belle époque of the bourgeoisie came to an end: in particular, space and time, their representation and real- ity indissociably linked. In scientific knowledge, the old Euclidian and Newtonian space gave way to Einsteinian relativity. But at the same time, as is evident from the painting of the period—Cézanne first of all, then analytical Cubism—perceptible space and per- spective disintegrated. The line of horizon, optical meeting-point of parallel lines, disappeared from paintings.2 At the age of fourteen, Beckett, a son of the Protestant Anglo Irish bourgeoisie, witnessed in the largely Catholic nationalist uprising in Ireland, something Charles Travis is at Trinity College Dublin, Long Room Hub.
    [Show full text]
  • Disjecta Membra a Poetic Interplay of Fragments
    disjecta membra disjecta membra A poetic interplay of fragments Lyna Ayr master of art & design 2012 contents page. attestation of authorship [011] intellectual property rights [013] acknowledgements [015] abstract [017] synopsis [019] introduction [021] chapter 1: positioning of the researcher [023] Illustrating poetics [024] Childhood and the fragment [035] Culture and fracture [036] John the Baptist [037] chapter 2: review of contextual knowledge [039] Disjecta Membra as a poetic concept [040] Constructions of the death of John the Baptist [041] Poetry-film as a media form [043] chapter 3: methodology [047] Heuristics [049] Design of the research [050] Reviewing and pattern finding [051] Breaking [052] Making and order [061] Reassembly and refinement [071] chapter 4: critical commentary [077] This exegesis is submitted to the Auckland University of Technology Poetry-film [078] for the Masters of Art & Design. Disjecta membra and textual fragments [080] Lyna Ayr B. Art & Design Honours, AUT University: Auckland. 2011 Lyna Ayr, B. Graphic Design, AUT University: Auckland. 2009 Iconography [082] Printed July 2013 Structure [088] © Lyna Ayr 2014 All rights reserved. conclusion This publication, may not be reproduced, stored in a retrieval system, or transmitted, in any form or by any means, electronic, The work and its journey [090] mechanical, photocopying, recording or otherwise without the Post examination reflective statement [092] prior permission of the owner. Printed and bound by Printsprint, Wellesley, Auckland. 5 table of images chapter 1 [positioning of researcher] reference list [095] Creative texts relating to the beheading of John the Baptist [100] Figure 1:1 Ayr, L. (2009) Mother the Eternal [Photography, 376 mm x 1200mm].
    [Show full text]
  • “The Human Condition” in Samuel Beckett's Waiting for Godot Michiko
    “The Human Condition” in Samuel Beckett’s Waiting for Godot Michiko Tsushima, University of Tsukuba, Japan The Asian Conference on Arts & Humanities 2020 Official Conference Proceedings Abstract In his essay about two painters, the van Velde brothers, Samuel Beckett presents a view that both men share a profound interest in “the human condition,” which precedes their interest in painting. This view relates to Beckett’s own conception of art. He himself was interested in “the human condition” in his creation of art. Beckett experienced the devastation of the Second World War. Through his work (e.g., Waiting for Godot, Endgame, and Happy Days), he explored the condition of those who survive in the world in its extremity. This paper sheds light on “the human condition” revealed in the act of waiting in Waiting for Godot, a French play written in 1949. The play depicts the human condition as the condition of being “tied to Godot.” This condition implies the human finitude—the tormenting in-between condition—being short of the world and that of never being able to escape from the here and now. At the same time, this condition of being “tied to Godot” indicates one last ounce of belief in the world. By disclosing this invisible “tie,” Waiting for Godot evokes “the link between man and the world” (Deleuze) in the audience’s mind. Keywords: Samuel Beckett, The Human Condition, Waiting iafor The International Academic Forum www.iafor.org Introduction In his essay about two brother-painters, Bram and Geer van Velde, “La peinture des van Velde ou le Monde et le Pantalon” (1945), Samuel Beckett presents a view that both men share a profound interest in “the human condition,” which precedes their interest in painting.
    [Show full text]
  • Bibliographie
    Bibliographie Ouvrages de Beckett Beckett, Samuel : « Actes sans paroles I », in : le même : Comédie et actes divers. Paris : Minuit, 1972, p. 93-102. Beckett, Samuel : « Actes sans paroles II », in : le même : Comédie et actes divers. Paris : Minuit, 1972, p. 103-110. Beckett, Samuel : As The Story Was Told. London : Calder, 1990. Beckett, Samuel : « Berceuse », in : le même : Catastrophe et autres dramaticules. Paris : Minuit, 1982, p. 40-55. Beckett, Samuel : « Comédie », in : le même : Comédie et actes di- vers. Paris : Minuit, 1972, p. 7-36. Beckett, Samuel : Comment c’est. Paris : Minuit, 1964. Beckett, Samuel : Compagnie. Paris : Minuit, 1980. Beckett, Samuel : « Dante… Bruno… Vico… Joyce », in : le même : Disjecta. Miscellaneous Writings and a Dramatic Fragment by Samuel Beckett, édité et préfacé par Ruby Cohn. New York : Grove, 1984, p. 19-33. Beckett, Samuel : Le Dépeupleur. Paris : Minuit, 1970. Beckett, Samuel : « Les deux besoins », in : le même : Disjecta. Miscellaneous Writings and a Dramatic Fragment by Samuel Beckett, édité et préfacé par Ruby Cohn. New York : Grove, 1984, p. 55-57. Beckett, Samuel : « Dis Joe », in : le même : Comédie et actes divers. Paris : Minuit, 1972, p. 79-92. Beckett, Samuel : Dream of Fair to middling women, édité par Eoin O’Brien, Edith Fournier. New York : Arcade Publishing, 1992. Beckett, Samuel : En attendant Godot. Paris : Minuit, 1952. Beckett, Samuel : Fin de Partie. Paris : Minuit, 1957. Beckett, Samuel : « German letter of 1937 », in : le même : Disjecta. Miscellaneous Writings and a Dramatic Fragment by Samuel Beckett, édité et préfacé par Ruby Cohn. New York : Grove, 1984, p. 51-54. 248 L’éthique beckettienne et sa réalisation dans la forme Beckett, Samuel : « Imagination morte imaginez », in : le même : Têtes mortes.
    [Show full text]
  • The Story of Samuel Beckett's Short Prose Fiction
    Samuel Beckett, 1969, Ink on board , as represented by cartoonist Edmund Valtman. From Storms of Sound to Missing Words: The Story of Samuel Beckett’s Short prose Fiction María José Carrera de la Red UNIVERSIDAD DE VALLADOLID A chronological ove r v i ew of Samuel Becke t t ’s short prose fiction may seem an unlikely choice as a celebration of the life and work of the author of seminal texts in the history of 20t h- c e n t u r y literature like Waiting for Godot or The Unnamable. But it takes the reading of these lesser- k n ow n t exts to fully understand what the whole Beckettian project is about. If Beckett referred to his prose fiction as “the important writing” —signifi c a n t l y, prose was the only genre, with poetry, that he practised from the beginning to the very end of his career— his short prose texts in particular can be said to delineate the story of his creative evolution providing, by virtue of their concentrated nature, magnificent introductions to his varying artistic intentions and writing methods. As might be expected with an author like Beckett, some of these texts are so innova t ive or experimental that even terminology fails. Certainly it is hard to call them fi c t i o n, or s t o r i e s, but eve n the word p ro s e is ill-fitting to describe some of Becke t t ’s more concentrated attempts, one of which was about to be included in a poetry collection when Beckett claimed that it was prose not ve r s e .
    [Show full text]
  • Collected Shorter Plays of Samuel Beckett Murphy
    Collected Shorter Plays Works by Samuel Beckett published by Grove Press Cas cando Mercier and Camier Collected Poems in Molloy English and French More Pricks Than Kicks The Collected Shorter Plays of Samuel Beckett Murphy Company Nohow On (Company, Seen Disjecta Said, Worstward Ho) Endgame Ill Ohio Impromptu Ends and Odds Ill Proust First Love and Other Stories Rockaby Happy Days Stories and Texts How It Is for Nothing I Can't Go On, I'll Go On Three Novels Krapp Last Tape Waiting for Godot The Lost Ones Watt s Malone Dies Worstward Ho Happy Days: Samuel Beckett's Production Notebooks, edited by James Knowlson Samuel Beckett: The Complete Short Prose, 1929-/989, edited and with an introduction and notes by S. E. Gontarski The Theatrical Notebooks of Samuel Beckett: Endgame, edited by S. E. Gontarski The Theatrical Notebooks of Samuel Beckett: Krapp's Last Tape, edited by James Knowlson The Theatrical Notebooks of Samuel Beckett: Waiting for Godot, edited by Dougald McMillan and James Knowlson COLLECTED SHORTER PLAYS SAMUEL BECKETT Grove Press New York Copyright© 1984 by Samuel Beckett All rights reserved. No part of this book may be reproduced,stored in a retrieval system, or transmitted in any form, by any means, including mechanical, electronic, photocopying,recording, or otherwise,without prior written permission of the publisher. Grove Press 841 Broadway New York, NY 10003 All That Fall © Samuel Beckett, 1957; Act Without Words I © Samuel Beckett, 1959; Act Without Words II© Samuel Beckett,1959; Krapp's Last 'Ihpe© Samuel Beckett,1958; Rough for Theatre I © Samuel Beckett, 1976; Rough for Theatre II© Samuel Beckett,1976; Embers © Samuel Beckett,1959; Rough for Radio I© Samuel Beckett,1976; Rough forRadio II© Samuel Beckett, 1976; Words and Music © Samuel Beckett,1962; Cascando© Samuel Beckett, 1963; Play © Samuel Beckett, 1963; Film © Samuel Beckett, 1967; The Old Tune, adapt.
    [Show full text]
  • Download Disjecta: Miscellaneous Writings and a Dramatic Fragment
    DISJECTA: MISCELLANEOUS WRITINGS AND A DRAMATIC FRAGMENT DOWNLOAD FREE BOOK Samuel Beckett, Ruby Cohn | 178 pages | 06 Feb 1995 | Avalon Travel Publishing | 9780802151292 | English | Chicago, United States Jeff Hirsch Books Initially unsure I should care, but I translated it anyway. A foolhardy endeavor, for sure, but a fun read. His wife Suzanne died on July 17, and Beckett died on December 22nd of the same year. The only known extant fragment was given by Beckett to Ruby Cohn. Built on the Johns Hopkins University Campus. Philip Best rated it really liked it Sep 13, Strongly influenced by James Joyce, he is considered one of the last modernists. Without cookies your experience may not be seamless. Paperbackpages. As a boy, he studied French and enjoyed cricket, tennis, and boxing. His hoax lecture describing the life and influence of a fake poet is untranslated, which is odd, and annoying, and I spent more time than I would like to admit using Google Translate Disjecta: Miscellaneous Writings and a Dramatic Fragment get the text to English from its original French. He offers an anti-allegorical reading of each play—staying very close to the actual scripts and integrating staging history where appropriate. Other editions. Read more To ask other readers questions about Disjectaplease sign up. Get A Copy. You can't skim Beckett, or if you do, then you are not reading Beckett at all, for by skipping or eliding or jumping ahead you miss Of all the authors I have read, I find Beckett to be the most challenging by far. Books by Samuel Beckett.
    [Show full text]
  • A Biennial of Contemporary Art Disjecta Interdisciplinary Art Center March 13
    A BIENNIAL OF CONTEMPORARY ART DISJECTA INTERDISCIPLINARY ART CENTER MARCH 13 — MAY 22, 2010 Published on the occasion of Portland2010: A Biennial of Contemporary Art, presented by Disjecta Interdisciplinary Art Center and curated by Cris Moss. Portland2010 was presented in Portland, Oregon, at the following venues: Alicia Blue Gallery, Alpern Gallery, The Art Gym at Marylhurst University, Disjecta Interdisciplinary Art Center, Elizabeth Leach Gallery, Leftbank, The Templeton Building, Rocksbox Fine Art, and White Box at the University of Oregon, Portland February 21 through May 9, 2010. Copyright 2010 Disjecta Interdisciplinary Art Center, 8371 N Interstate Ave., Portland, Oregon 97217 Designed by Joshua Berger, Plazm Design www.plazm.com Typeset in Gotham by Hoefler & Frere-Jones, and Adobe Garamond Edited by Kelly Bryan Printed by B&B Printsource, Tigard, Oregon Portland2010 was made possible by grants from Meyer Memorial Trust, Oregon Cultural Trust and the Regional Arts & Culture Council, and sponsorship and in-kind generosity from: Alicia Blue Gallery, Alpern Gallery, Chas Bowie, Annie Buckley, B&B Printsource, Joshua Berger, Plazm Design; Kelly Bryan, Deschutes Brewery, IFCC, Lamar Advertising, Leftbank, Mark Stein Photography, Milepost5, Cris Moss, Portland State University, Rock’s Box Fine Art, Stephanie Snyder, Kevin Smith, Trimet, Sign Wizards, White Box, University of Oregon, and many volunteers. Exhibition Coordinators: Natalie Garyet, Katherine Rosenheim, Alexandra Smith, Amy Peterson Photography Credits: All Mark Stein
    [Show full text]
  • The Censor's “Filthy Synecdoche”: Samuel Beckett and Censorship
    Sanglap 2.2 (Feb 2016) Censorship and Literature The Censor’s “filthy synecdoche”: Samuel Beckett and Censorship Martin Schauss “The Royal Court Theatre, London (George Devine) want to do [Endgame] in the Fall. I don’t see how they can do it without cuts which I won’t have.” -- letter to Barney Rosset, 11 Jan 1957 “In London the Lord Chamberpot demands inter alia the removal of the entire prayer scene! I’ve told him to buckingham off.” (sic) -- letter to Alan Schneider, 29 Dec 1957 Samuel Beckett’s antipathy and intolerance towards any form of state censorship are well documented, not least in James Knowlson’s biography Damned to Fame (1996), as are his own run-ins with censorial bodies—the Irish Censorship of Publications Board and, in the United Kingdom, the Lord Chamberlain’s office, which licensed theatre performances in England until 1968. Beckett’s early collection of short stories, More Pricks Than Kicks (MPTK), as well as the novels Murphy, Watt, and Molloy, all ended up banned in Ireland under the Censorship of Publications Act of 1929, sometimes with considerable delay (as in the case of Murphy, banned more than 25 years after being first published), sometimes shortly after publication (as with MPTK and Molloy). The London performances of Waiting for Godot, Endgame, and, to a lesser extent, Krapp’s Last Tape all followed lengthy wrangles with the Lord Chamberlain marked by petty revisions to the text, principle-based compromise, and the writer’s incredulity. 1 This essay argues that Beckett uses obscene material to stage a confrontation with censorship practices in an attempt to turn the tables on the censor and expose the instability of institutionalised moral borders.
    [Show full text]