DOCSLIB.ORG

Appendix B Shoreline Characterization Grant County (PDF)

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Appendix B Shoreline Characterization Grant County (PDF) APPENDIX B SHORELINE CHARACTERIZATION, GRANT COUNTY Appendix B Grant County Shoreline Master Program Update Shoreline Inventory, Analysis, and Characterization Report 1 SHORELINE INVENTORY Appendix B contains the Inventory, Analysis, and Characterization results for unincorporated portions of Grant County (County). This section describes the land use patterns of the County, specifically detailing: Existing land use Planned land use based on the County’s 2006 updated Comprehensive Plan Preferred use for shoreline areas based on the Shoreline Management Act (SMA) Existing shoreline environment designations based on the current County Shoreline Master Program (SMP) Section 2 summarizes the land-capacity analysis results per the methodology outlined in Section 8 of the main report. Section 3 summarizes the characterization of each County shoreline reach. The following reaches are included: Columbia River (Reaches 1 through 5) Crescent Bay and Lake Roosevelt Banks and Associated Lakes Coffee and Long Lakes Sun Lakes: Blue Lake Sun Lakes: Other Lakes Sun Lakes: Park Lake Soap Lake Reservoirs along Main Canal Small Lakes South of Wilson Creek Ephrata Lake and Rocky Ford Lake Moses Lake (Reaches 1 through 3) Quincy Basin Lakes Potholes Coulee and Frenchman Coulee Lakes Final Draft Shoreline Inventory and Characterization Report June 2013 Grant County Shoreline Master Program Update 1 110827-01.01 Appendix B Potholes Reservoir (Reaches 1 through 2) Drumheller Channels Lakes Lakes North of Lower Crab Creek Lower Grant County Lakes Lind Coulee Lower Crab Creek Rocky Ford Creek Sand Hollow Creek Upper Crab Creek (Reaches 1 through 2) 1.1 Land Use Patterns 1.1.1 Existing Land Use Currently the County has approximately 32,400 acres of land along its shoreline. Most of the Grant County shoreline is unimproved and owned by federal, state, or local governments. Public ownership includes the following: National Parks Service (NPS) Washington State Department of Fish and Wildlife (WDFW) Washington State Parks and Recreation Commission (State Parks) Washington State Department of Natural Resources (DNR) U.S. Bureau of Land Management (BLM) U.S. Bureau of Reclamation (USBR) U.S. Department of Energy (USDOE) U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service (USFWS) Unimproved land includes barren, grass, and shrub type land covers. Besides unimproved vacant land, the predominant existing use along the shoreline is agriculture. Other uses include commercial, industrial, and residential uses. Most of the developed lands fall within the County’s Urban Growth Areas (UGA), and activity centers where intense rural developments take place. See Appendices C through H for land uses within the cities and towns, including the Town of Coulee City, City of Electric City, City of Grand Coulee, Town of Krupp, City of Soap Lake and the Town of Wilson Creek. Final Draft Shoreline Inventory and Characterization Report June 2013 Grant County Shoreline Master Program Update 2 110827-01.01 Appendix B Table 1 Shoreline Existing Land Use – County-wide Existing Land Use Shoreline Area Acres % of Land Use Agriculture 3,357.01 10.5% Commercial 145.54 0.5% Open Space 291.40 0.9% Recreational 1,455.81 4.5% Residential, Multifamily 27.49 0.1% Residential, Single 536.49 1.7% Resource 36.45 0.1% Transportation 295.91 0.9% Undeveloped 25,872.00 80.8% 1.1.2 Planned Land Use Grant County’s Comprehensive Plan (plan) was adopted in 1999 and updated in 2006. The plan reflects a collective vision of the community’s desire and provides guidance for future development. Its vision and goal are set to protect and conserve the natural beauty and rural character of the County. It also aims to protect and conserve the County’s agricultural resources, and prevent inappropriate conversion of prime agricultural lands. The plan’s land use element aims to promote growth and economic development, as well as maintain the rural and agricultural land use. The plan provides overall direction and guidelines for future commercial, industrial, residential, agricultural, and natural resource lands, as well as general location, distribution, and intensity of various land use types. Designation of various land use types is a key aspect for the County to implement its land use goals and vision. In most cases, Grant County’s existing land uses are consistent with future land use. Outside the city limits and Urban Growth Boundaries, the planned land use along the shoreline constitutes of rural residential 1, rural residential 2, residential, low density, residential, medium density, residential, high density, commercial, recreational development, rural community, rural village, rural remote, agricultural service center, Hanford Federal Reserve, open space, master planned resort, Hanford shoreline development, dryland, irrigated, and Final Draft Shoreline Inventory and Characterization Report June 2013 Grant County Shoreline Master Program Update 3 110827-01.01 Appendix B rangeland. All future land uses within shoreline jurisdiction and their general purpose and intent are discussed below. 1.1.2.1 Rural Residential 1 This designation allows one dwelling unit per 5 acres. This maintains existing rural character and acts as a transition between existing rural developments and other higher or lower intensity developments. Other uses include small scale farm and open space. 1.1.2.2 Rural Residential 2 This land use designation allows one dwelling unit per 5 acres. This maintains rural character and also allows residential uses near smaller lots and where services and infrastructure may be available. Uses besides residential include include small-scale farms and open space. 1.1.2.3 Residential, Low Density Residential, low density allows one to four dwelling units per acre. Allowed uses are single- family residential housing and duplexes. 1.1.2.4 Residential, Medium Density This land use designation allows four to eight dwelling units per acre. Allowed uses are single-family residential housing and duplexes. 1.1.2.5 Residential, High Density This land use designation allows higher residential density at eight to 16 dwelling units per acre. This also allows multifamily housing. 1.1.2.6 Commercial Commercial land use designation provides areas for retail, office, personal and professional services, and other commercial activities. Final Draft Shoreline Inventory and Characterization Report June 2013 Grant County Shoreline Master Program Update 4 110827-01.01 Appendix B 1.1.2.7 Recreational Development This land use allows residential and commercial development related to seasonal, resort- related, or tourist activities in rural areas. Activities and uses are often shoreline related. Land use includes hotels, condominiums, vacation home rentals, retail stores, restaurants, golf courses, marinas, open space, and similar recreational or tourist activities. Small-scale residential development is also allowed in this land use designation with maximum density of one dwelling unit per acre. 1.1.2.8 Rural Community Rural community land use designation areas are characterized by urban type densities and that may offer some urban services such as community water, limited commercial uses, and fire protection. This land use designation is assigned to small communities and allows a mix of single-family residences, small-scale industries, and businesses, public facilities such as post offices, schools, and fire departments, and open space. Residential density allowed in this land use designation is one dwelling unit per acre. 1.1.2.9 Rural Village Rural village land use is designated for compact, self-sufficient town that functions as a small urban center and provides housing, convenience goods, and services to residents. Allows uses include single-family residences, small-scale industries and businesses, public facilities such as post offices, schools, and fire departments, and open space. Although residential density is limited by the soil and infrastructure capacity, maximum density allowed in this land use is four dwelling units per acre. 1.1.2.10 Rural Remote Rural remote land use allows one dwelling unit per 20 acres. This land use is for remote areas with limited development opportunities where intensive farming is not suitable. Other uses include resource-oriented activities (farming and mineral extraction), and open space. Final Draft Shoreline Inventory and Characterization Report June 2013 Grant County Shoreline Master Program Update 5 110827-01.01 Appendix B 1.1.2.11 Agricultural Service Center This land use designation allows small and large scale agricultural industries and businesses in a compact core, single-family residences, and open space uses. Single-family residential density is limited to one dwelling unit per acre. 1.1.2.12 Hanford Federal Reserve Hanford Federal Reserve land use is designated to areas under Hanford Reach National Monument. This land use designation aims to protect and enhance the areas plant and natural resources and offer recreation per the County’s Interim Action Plan. 1.1.2.13 Port of Moses Lake This land use designation is one of the County’s special district designations. This is assigned to Grant Public Utility District’s (PUD’s) District No. 10. This district includes the Port’s multiple economic development activities, such as heavy jet testing and training facilities, business parks, and industrial facilities. 1.1.2.14 Open Space Grant County’s shoreline contains significant amount of land with open space land use designation. According to the County Comprehensive Plan, the purpose of the open
Load more

Recommended publications
  • Glossary Glossary
    Glossary Glossary Albedo A measure of an object’s reflectivity. A pure white reflecting surface has an albedo of 1.0 (100%). A pitch-black, nonreflecting surface has an albedo of 0.0. The Moon is a fairly dark object with a combined albedo of 0.07 (reflecting 7% of the sunlight that falls upon it). The albedo range of the lunar maria is between 0.05 and 0.08. The brighter highlands have an albedo range from 0.09 to 0.15. Anorthosite Rocks rich in the mineral feldspar, making up much of the Moon’s bright highland regions. Aperture The diameter of a telescope’s objective lens or primary mirror. Apogee The point in the Moon’s orbit where it is furthest from the Earth. At apogee, the Moon can reach a maximum distance of 406,700 km from the Earth. Apollo The manned lunar program of the United States. Between July 1969 and December 1972, six Apollo missions landed on the Moon, allowing a total of 12 astronauts to explore its surface. Asteroid A minor planet. A large solid body of rock in orbit around the Sun. Banded crater A crater that displays dusky linear tracts on its inner walls and/or floor. 250 Basalt A dark, fine-grained volcanic rock, low in silicon, with a low viscosity. Basaltic material fills many of the Moon’s major basins, especially on the near side. Glossary Basin A very large circular impact structure (usually comprising multiple concentric rings) that usually displays some degree of flooding with lava. The largest and most conspicuous lava- flooded basins on the Moon are found on the near side, and most are filled to their outer edges with mare basalts.
    [Show full text]
  • Human and Machine in Spaceflight
    Digital Apollo: Human and Machine in Spaceflight David A. Mindell The MIT Press Cambridge, Massachusetts London, England ( 2008 Massachusetts Institute of Technology All rights reserved. No part of this book may be reproduced in any form by any electronic or mechanical means (including photocopying, recording, or information storage and retrieval) without permission in writing from the publisher. For information about special quantity discounts, please email [email protected] This book was set in Stone Serif and Stone Sans on 3B2 by Asco Typesetters, Hong Kong. Printed and bound in the United States of America. Library of Congress Cataloging-in-Publication Data Mindell, David A. Digital Apollo : human and machine in spaceflight / David A. Mindell. p. cm. Includes bibliographical references and index. ISBN 978-0-262-13497-2 (hardcover : alk. paper) 1. Human-machine systems. 2. Project Apollo (U.S.)—History. 3. Astronautics—United States—History. 4. Manned spaceflight—History. I. Title. TA167.M59 2008 629.47 04—dc22 2007032255 10987654321 Index Accelerometers, 1 control and, 19–22 Apollo program and, 97, 109–110, 119, 132, F-80 Shooting Star, 45 174, 194, 201 F-104 Starfighter, 45 AC Spark Plug, 110, 127, 134, 137 SR-71, 45 Adams, Mike, 59–61 stability and, 19–22 Adaptive control systems, 57–61, 77 U-2, 45 AGC (Apollo guidance computer), 259 X-1, 44, 46 Apollo 4 and, 174–175 X-15, 6 (see also X-15) Apollo 5 and, 175 Air-pressure gauges, 24 Apollo 7 and, 177 Aldrin, Edwin ‘‘Buzz,’’ 1–4, 8, 86 astronaut input and, 159 Eagle and, 217–232
    [Show full text]
  • Power System
    HISTORY AND CURRENT STATUS OF THE ELECTRICITY INFRASTRUCTURE IN THE PACIFIC NORTHWEST Kevin Schneider Ph.D., P.E. Chair, Seattle Chapter of the IEEE PES IEEE PES SCHOLARSHIP PLUS INITIATIVE 2 Washington State PES Scholars • Patrick Berg, Seattle University • Parichehr Karimi, University of • Zachary Burrows, Eastern Washington Washington UiUnivers ity • TiTravis Kinney, WhitWashington Sta te UiUnivers ity • Erin Clement, University of Washington • Allan Koski, Eastern Washington University • Anastasia Corman, University of • Kyle Lindgren, University of Washington, Washington • John Martinsen, Washington State • Gwendolyn Crabtree, Washington State University University • Melissa Martinsen, University of • David Dearing, Washington State Washington University • JthJonathan NhiNyhuis, SttlSeattle PifiPacific UiUnivers ity • Terra Donley, Gonzaga University Derek Jared Pisinger, Washington State Gowrylow, Seattle University University • Sanel Hirkic, Washington State University • Douglas Rapier, Washington State • Nathan Hirsch, Eastern Washington University University • Chris Rusnak, Washington State University • John Hofman, Washington State • Kaiwen Sun, University of Washington University • Joshua Wu, Seattle University • • Tracy Yuan, University of Washington 3 OVERVIEW Part 1: The Current Status of the Electricity Infrastructure in the Pacific North west Part 2: How the Current System Evolved Over Time Part 3: Current Challenges and the Path Forward Part 4: Concluding Comments PART 1:: THE CURRENT STATUS OF THE ELECTRICITY INFRASTRUCTURE
    [Show full text]
  • Washington Grain Train
    How does the Washington Grain Train generate revenues? Washington Usage fees for grain cars are generated on the BNSF Railroad based on a combination of mileage traveled and number of days on that railroad (time and mileage). The further the car travels Grain Train and the longer it is on a particular railroad, the more money the car earns. The shuttle service between grain elevators and the barge terminal in Wallula use a different system. A car use fee per trip was June 2011 established for the shuttle service based on estimates of time and mileage. One car use fee was established for shipments on the PV Hooper rail line, and another for the BLMR. These fees are deposited directly into accounts managed by each of the three Grain Train Revolving Fund (Washington State-Owned Cars) port districts. These funds are used for grain car maintenance, car tracking, and Dollars in millions eventual car replacement (based on a 20- $1.4 year depreciation schedule). A portion of $1.2 these fees are also set aside and used as $1.0 a “reserve” fund that is periodically tapped for fleet expansion. $0.8 Once the reserve fund has grown large $0.6 enough to purchase rail cars and there is $0.4 a demonstrated need for additional cars, WSDOT can instruct the port districts to $0.2 send funds to a rail car sales firm selected $0 by WSDOT. This firm then delivers the cars 1999 2000 2001 2002 2003 2004 2005 2006 2007 2008 2009 2010 to Washington for rehabilitation and then Twenty nine additional grain hopper rail cars were purchased in 2010.
    [Show full text]
  • Sky and Telescope
    SkyandTelescope.com The Lunar 100 By Charles A. Wood Just about every telescope user is familiar with French comet hunter Charles Messier's catalog of fuzzy objects. Messier's 18th-century listing of 109 galaxies, clusters, and nebulae contains some of the largest, brightest, and most visually interesting deep-sky treasures visible from the Northern Hemisphere. Little wonder that observing all the M objects is regarded as a virtual rite of passage for amateur astronomers. But the night sky offers an object that is larger, brighter, and more visually captivating than anything on Messier's list: the Moon. Yet many backyard astronomers never go beyond the astro-tourist stage to acquire the knowledge and understanding necessary to really appreciate what they're looking at, and how magnificent and amazing it truly is. Perhaps this is because after they identify a few of the Moon's most conspicuous features, many amateurs don't know where Many Lunar 100 selections are plainly visible in this image of the full Moon, while others require to look next. a more detailed view, different illumination, or favorable libration. North is up. S&T: Gary The Lunar 100 list is an attempt to provide Moon lovers with Seronik something akin to what deep-sky observers enjoy with the Messier catalog: a selection of telescopic sights to ignite interest and enhance understanding. Presented here is a selection of the Moon's 100 most interesting regions, craters, basins, mountains, rilles, and domes. I challenge observers to find and observe them all and, more important, to consider what each feature tells us about lunar and Earth history.
    [Show full text]
  • Top 26 Trails in Grant County 2020
    and 12 Watchable Wildlife Units For more information, please contact: Grant County Tourism Commission P.O. Box 37, Ephrata, WA 98823 509.765.7888 • 800.992.6234 In Grant County, Washington TourGrantCounty.com TOP TRAILS Grant County has some of the most scenic and pristine vistas, hiking trails and outdoor 26 recreational opportunities in Washington State. and 12 Watchable Wildlife Units Grant County is known for its varied landscapes on a high desert plateau with coulees, lakes, in Grant County Washington reservoirs, sand dunes, canals, rivers, creeks, and other waterways. These diverse ecosystems Grant County Tourism Commission For Additional copies please contact: support a remarkable variety of fish and PO Box 37 Jerry T. Gingrich wildlife species that contribute to the economic, Ephrata, Washington 98837 Grant County Tourism Commission recreational and cultural life of the County. www.tourgrantcounty.com Grant County Courthouse PO Box 37 Ephrata, WA 98837 No part of this book may be reproduced in (509) 754-2011, Ext. 2931 any form, or by any electronic, mechanical, or other means, without permission in For more information on writing from the Grant County Tourism Grant County accommodations Commission. www.tourgrantcounty.com © 2019, Grant County Tourism Commission Second printing, 10m Trails copy and photographs Book, map and cover design by: provided by: Denise Adam Graphic Design Cameron Smith, Lisa Laughlin, J. Kemble, Veradale, WA 99037 Shawn Cardwell, Mark Amara, (509) 891-0873 Emry Dinman, Harley Price, [email protected] Sebastian Moraga and Madison White Printed by: Rewriting and editing by: Mark Amara Pressworks 2717 N. Perry Street Watchable Wildlife copy and Spokane, Washington 99207 photographs provided by: (509) 462-7627 Washington Department of [email protected] Fish and Wildlife Photograph by Lisa Laughlin CONTENTS CONTENTS Grant County Trails and Hiking Grant County Watchable Wildlife Viewing Upper Grand Coulee Area 1.
    [Show full text]
  • Appendix a Data Compilation
    APPENDIX A DATA COMPILATION Table of Contents A-1 Bibliography A-2 Non-GIS Data Directory A-3 GIS Data Directory APPENDIX A-1 BIBLIOGRAPHY Spokane Watershed Bibliography Appendix A1 1. Adema, G. W. Bedrock Depth and Morphology of the Rathdrum Prairie, Idaho: University of Idaho; c1999. 67 pages. Notes: Master of Science Thesis 2. Adema, G. W.; K.F.Sprenke., and R.M. Breckenridge. Bed Morphology of the Spokane Valley/Rathdrum Prairie Aquifer from a Detailed Gravity Survey [abstract]. Geological Society of America. 1998; 30(6). 3. Ader, M. J. Hydrogeology of the Green Bluff Plateau Spokane County. Washington State Department of Ecology, Shorelands and Water Resources Program; 1996; Open File Technical Information Report 96-03. 27 pages. 4. Allen, D. R. Latah Creek, Washington, Watershed: 1995-1996 Water Year Water Quality Assessment [abstract]. Inland Northwest Water Resources Conference, Program and Abstracts; 1997. 5. Amerigian, C.; J. Toth, and S.P. Reidel. Paleomagnetism of the Columbia River Basalt Group [abstract]. Geological Society of America Abstracts With Programs. 1987; 19(6):354. 6. Ames, K. C.; N.P. Matson.; D.M. Suzuki., and P.B. Sak. Inventory, Characterization, and Water Quality of Springs, Seeps, and Streams near Midnite Mine, Stevens County, Washington. U.S. Geological Survey; 1996; U.S. Geological Survey Open-File Report 96-115. 53 pages. 7. Anderson, A. M.; K. Bloudek.; P.O. Hyde; O. O'Connor, and N. Ogren. Evaluation of Urban Runoff Treatment in Swales. Spokane, Washington: Gonzaga University, School of Engineering, Center for Engineering Design; 1996; Senior Design Project 95-5. 44 pages. 8.
    [Show full text]
  • The Apollo 11 Drive Tubes, 24 Mar 1978
    THE APOLLO 11 DRIVE TUBES Dissection and description by Judith H. Allton 24 r~arch 1978 i' PROCEDURES AND METHODS OF STUDY 11.1.1 l. Lunar Surface Procedures and Sampling Rationale 1 .. ...... 2. Cari ng Hardware . ... .•. .. ..•.. ..... .... ...... ..... 3 3. Initial Processing in the BioPreparation Laboratory.. 3 4. Initial Weights and Sample Numbering •••••••••••••••• 3 5. Subsequent History of Handling •••••••••••••••••••••• 4 6. Allocations Prior to Final Dissection ••••••••••••••• 4 7. Dissection Procedure ..... ......................•.... 5 8. Compos i ti ona1 Descri ptions Used for >1 mm Fragments .. 6 9. Analysis of Data ......•..•.••.•...•••.••.•..••••••.. 6 10. 10004 Dissection Procedure Notes .................... 8 11. 10005 Dissection Procedure Notes •••••••••••••••••••• 9 RESULTS AND DISCUSSION •••••••••••••• 10 1. Preservation of Lunar Stratigraphy.................. 10 A. 10004 Initial Core Description ............... 10 B. 10005 Initial Core Description ••••••••••••••• 10 C. 10004 1977 Core Description ................. 11 D. 10005 1977 Core Description ••••••••••••••••• 12 2. Description of Units 10004 •••••••.••••••••••••••••• 14 3. Description of Units 10005 •••.••••••••••••••••••••• 16 4. Comparison of 10004 and 10005 .............. ...... .... 16 WORKS CITED IN TEXT ••••••••••••••••• 18 APPENDIX ..••••.•••.•••..••.•..•••••. 20 /' ' ____ II.l.i \\ \ II.l.ii LIST OF FIGURES AND TABLES IN TEXT Figure 1. Map of Landing Site ................................. 11.1.2 2. Core 10004 Designation of Intervals ••••••••••••••••• 7 3. Distribution of Some Rock Types in Core 10004 •••••.• 14 By Weight Content 4. Distribution of Some Rock Types in Core 10005 ...... 15 By Weight Content Table 1. Weight Percent Composition of >1 mm Fraction. 17 A Comparison of 10004 and 10005 APPENDIX Figure 5. Size Analysis of Apollo 11 Fines .................... 21 Table 2. Raw Data for Core 10004 ••••••••••••••••••••••••••••• 22 3. Raw Data for Core 10005 ••••••••••••••••••••••••••••• 23 4. Drive Tube 10004 Sample Location Information ••••••• 24 5.
    [Show full text]
  • Grant County Pud Under the Clean Water Act
    KAMPMEIER & KNUTSEN PLLC ATTORNEYS AT LAW BRIAN A. KNUTSEN Licensed in Oregon & Washington 503.841.6515 [email protected] September 19, 2018 Via CERTIFIED MAIL – Return Receipt Requested Re: NOTICE OF INTENT TO SUE GRANT COUNTY PUD UNDER THE CLEAN WATER ACT Terry Brewer Dale Walker PUD Commissioner District 1 PUD Commissioner District 2 Grant County Public Utility District Grant County Public Utility District P.O. Box 878 P.O. Box 878 Ephrata, WA 98823 Ephrata, WA 98823 Larry Schaapman Tom Flint PUD Commissioner District 3 PUD Commissioner A-At Large Grant County Public Utility District Grant County Public Utility District P.O. Box 878 P.O. Box 878 Ephrata, WA 98823 Ephrata, WA 98823 Bob Bernd Managing Agent PUD Commissioner B-At Large Wanapum Dam Grant County Public Utility District Grant County Public Utility District P.O. Box 878 P.O. Box 878 Ephrata, WA 98823 Ephrata, WA 98823 Managing Agent Priest Rapids Dam Grant County Public Utility District P.O. Box 878 Ephrata, WA 98823 Dear Commissioners Terry Brewer, Dale Walker, Larry Schaapman, Tom Flint, and Bob Bernd, and Managing Agents for the Wanapum Dam and the Priest Rapids Dam: This letter is to provide you with sixty days notice of Columbia Riverkeeper’s (“Riverkeeper”) intent to file a citizen suit against the Grant County Public Utility District and Commissioners Terry Brewer, Dale Walker, Larry Schaapman, Tom Flint, and Bob Bernd, in their official capacity as the Commissioners of the Grant County Public Utility District (collectively, “PUD”) under section 505 of the Clean Water Act (“CWA”), 33 U.S.C.
    [Show full text]
  • Timber Resource Statistics for Eastern Washington
    EDITORS FILE COPY Agriculture Timber Resource Forest Setvice Pacific Northwest Forest and Range Statistics for Eastern Experiment Station Resource Bulletin PNW-104 washington September 1983 Patricia M. Bassett and Daniel D. Oswald Authors PATRICIA M. BASSEll is a computer programer analyst and DANIEL D. OSWALD is a resource analyst at the Pacific Northwest Forest and Range Experiment Station, P.O. Box 3890, Portland, Oregon 97208. Abstract Summary Preface Bassett, Patricia M.; Oswald, Daniel D. The eastern Washington resource area Forest Inventory and Analysis (formerly Timber resource statistics for eastern totals 26,966,000 acres (10 913 000 ha), Forest Survey) is a nationwide project of Washington. Resour. Bull. PNW-104. of which an estimated 9,216,000 acres the USDA Forest Service authorized by Portland, OR: U.S. Department of (3 730 000 ha) are forested. An estimated the Forest and Rangeland Renewable Agriculture, Forest Service, Pacific 7,145,000 acres (2 891 000 ha) are Resources Research Act of 1978. Work Northwest Forest and Range Experi- classified as timberland. The area has an units of the project, located at Forest ment Station; 1983.32 p. estimated 17.3 billion cubic feet Service Experiment Stations, conduct (491 million m3) of standing timber with forest resource inventories throughout This report summarizes a 1980 timber 72 percent of this volume in public the 50 States. The Pacific Northwest resource inventory of the 16 forested ownership. Forest and Range Experiment Station at counties in Washington east of the crest Portland, Oregon, is responsible for of the Cascade Range. Detailed tables of inventories in Alaska, California, Hawaii, forest area, timber volume, growth, Oregon, and Washington.
    [Show full text]
  • Dams and Hydroelectricity in the Columbia
    COLUMBIA RIVER BASIN: DAMS AND HYDROELECTRICITY The power of falling water can be converted to hydroelectricity A Powerful River Major mountain ranges and large volumes of river flows into the Pacific—make the Columbia precipitation are the foundation for the Columbia one of the most powerful rivers in North America. River Basin. The large volumes of annual runoff, The entire Columbia River on both sides of combined with changes in elevation—from the the border is one of the most hydroelectrically river’s headwaters at Canal Flats in BC’s Rocky developed river systems in the world, with more Mountain Trench, to Astoria, Oregon, where the than 470 dams on the main stem and tributaries. Two Countries: One River Changing Water Levels Most dams on the Columbia River system were built between Deciding how to release and store water in the Canadian the 1940s and 1980s. They are part of a coordinated water Columbia River system is a complex process. Decision-makers management system guided by the 1964 Columbia River Treaty must balance obligations under the CRT (flood control and (CRT) between Canada and the United States. The CRT: power generation) with regional and provincial concerns such as ecosystems, recreation and cultural values. 1. coordinates flood control 2. optimizes hydroelectricity generation on both sides of the STORING AND RELEASING WATER border. The ability to store water in reservoirs behind dams means water can be released when it’s needed for fisheries, flood control, hydroelectricity, irrigation, recreation and transportation. Managing the River Releasing water to meet these needs influences water levels throughout the year and explains why water levels The Columbia River system includes creeks, glaciers, lakes, change frequently.
    [Show full text]
  • Vantage Crossing
    Vantage Crossing Crossing the Columbia River on I‐90 at Vantage is dramatic, even if routine. From either direction the highway drops over 1000 feet from the relatively lofty Columbia Plateau and crosses a 2500‐foot‐long bridge over Wanapum Dam Reservoir. You may be surprised to learn that in 1914 only two cars at a time could cross at one time on a rickety car ferry. Quick Timeline Before the Settlement Era ‐ The region along the Columbia River from the Beverly Gap (10 miles south of Vantage) to the Snake River was inhabited by the Wanapum tribe of Native Americans in prehistoric times and into the early exploration and settlement era. 1805 ‐ Lewis and Clark spend two days with the Wanapum people near the confluence of the Snake and Columbia Rivers. 1910 ‐ First Vantage townsite platted by Willard Van Slyke who divided it into 120 lots with a 20‐acre easement down the middle. 1914 ‐ Van Slyke establishes a two‐car ferry across the Columbia from the Vantage townsite. The Sunset Highway at this time connected Vantage and Ellensburg via the old Vantage Highway, north of I‐90. 1927 – Washington State Highway Department. (WSDOT) opens a 1,640‐foot, two‐lane cantilever bridge, replacing the car ferry. 1962 ‐ A steel tied‐arch bridge opens at Vantage as part of Interstate 90 traffic construction, above the expected level of water behind the soon to be finished Wanapum Dam. 1964 ‐ Wanapum Dam begins operations 1968 – I‐90 down and through Ryegrass Coulee is completed and traffic no longer goes through Vantage.
    [Show full text]