DOCSLIB.ORG

Rheumatology-TP 1..2

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text

Load more

Rheumatology 2016 The British Society for Rheumatology, British Health Professionals in Rheumatology and the British Society for Paediatric and Adolescent Rheumatology Annual Meeting 26 – 28 April 2016 Scottish Exhibition þ Conference Centre, Glasgow, UK The abstracts are freely available online to all visitors to the Rheumatology website (http://www.rheumatology.oxfordjournals.org). RheumatologyDOI is incorrect10.1093/rheumatology/ker000ker000ContentsRheumatologyContents- Contents2016000000002016Volume 51 Supplement 1 April 2016 Volume 55 Supplement 1 April 2016 CONTENTS Rheumatology 2016 Abstracts INVITED SPEAKER ABSTRACTS (TUESDAY 26 APRIL 2016) I01–I03 Medico-legal issues in rheumatology i1 i04–i06 What patients want from their rheumatology service i1 i07–i09 Rheumatology in the world of social media i2 I10–I12 Pulmonary hypertension for rheumatologists i2 I13–I15 The three S’s in rheumatology i3 I16–I18 The BSRBR-RA at 15 years: lessons learned and future challenges i3 I19–I21 Men with rheumatoid arthritis i4 I22–I24 Make life easier for yourself: get patients inputting the data! i4 I25–I27 Why do we need a stratified medicine approach in rheumatic diseases? i5 I28–I30 Occupational rheumatology for the uninitiated: work and upper limb disorders i5 I31–I33 Management of vascular manifestations of the skin, kidneys and GI tract in systemic i6 sclerosis I34–I35 Dissemination and communication throughout your doctorate i7 I36–I37 Getting started with your audit/research project i7 I38 Jewels in the Crown i7 I39–I40 Michael Mason and Garrod Prize Winners i7 I41–I43 Top Scoring Abstracts (presented in Jewels in the Crown) i8 I44 Heberden Round i9 INVITED SPEAKER ABSTRACTS (WEDNESDAY 27 APRIL 2016) I45–I47 BRiTs: How to survive as a consultant: all the things you need to know i10 I48–I50 BSI: How targeted therapies reveal the immunology of autoimmune rhematic disease i10 I51-I53 BSI: Imaging immunology and inflammation in action i11 I54–I56 BSI: The role of RNA species and RNA binding proteins in the joint i11 I57–I59 Essentials: Disease management i12 I60–I62 Essentials: Symptom management i12 I63–I64 Essentials: Experts in the field i13 I65–I68 Engaging with South Asian community in rheumatology care i13 I69–I71 BSR clinical guidelines i14 I72–I76 Assessing disease activity and damage in vasculitis: an interactive practical session i15 I77–I79 Common musculoskeletal foot problems in primary care i15 I80–I82 Foot problems in inflammatory arthritis i16 I83–I85 Group clinics in musculoskeletal disease: better together i16 I86–I88 Dermatological manifestations in rheumatic disease: all you need to know i17 I89–I91 Supporting self-management for musculoskeletal health i18 I92–I94 Treating early rheumatoid arthritis to target: practice outside the UK i18 I95–I97 Disease modification in osteoarthritis i19 I98 Heberden Oration i19 www.rheumatology.oxfordjournals.org INVITED SPEAKER ABSTRACTS (THURSDAY 28 APRIL 2016) I99–I100 BRiTs 1: The lung in rheumatology i21 I101–I103 BRiTs 2: Radiology for rheumatologists i21 I104–I106 Management of septic arthritis in the 21st century i21 I107–I110 How to manage rheumatic diseases in pregnancy? i22 I111–I113 Psoriatic arthritis: before and after tumor necrosis factor inhibitors i22 I114–I117 Sjo¨ gren’s: welcome to the biologic era! i23 I118–I120 How to cope with statistics in a research paper i23 I121–I123 Rehabilitation in rheumatology: for young and old i24 I124–I126 Pain 1: State of the art: how to assess and manage low back pain i24 I127–I129 Pain 2: State of the art: management of persistent pain i25 I130–I131 Staying physically active with rheumatoid arthritis i26 I132 Droitwich Medical Trust Lecture i26 I133–I135 Adult inflammatory arthritis studies: the importance of longitudinal data collection i26 I136–I138 Fibromyalgia: preventing onset and improving outcome i27 I139–I141 What’s new in the antiphospholipid syndrome? i28 I142–I145 Unravelling knots of silk: Understanding Behc¸ et’s disease i29 I146–I149 Let’s keep axial spondyloarthropathy patients in work, engaged with physical activity and i29 self-managing their disease: an interdisciplinary approach I150–I151 BSR research committee launch party i30 I152–I153 Update on basic science and clinical aspects of systemic lupus erythematosus i30 I154–I156 Gout in the 21st Century i30 I157–I159 Adolescent and young adult rheumatology i31 I160–I162 Getting the most out of patient and public engagement i31 ORAL PRESENTATION OF ABSTRACTS (TUESDAY 26 APRIL 2016) O01–O06 Seronegative and spondyloarthopathies oral abstracts i33 O07–O12 Rheumatoid and vasculitis oral abstracts i36 ORAL PRESENTATION OF ABSTRACTS (WEDNESDAY 27 APRIL 2016) O13–O18 Osteoarthritis and osteoporosis oral abstracts i40 O19–O24 BHPR oral abstracts i43 O25–O30 Connective tissue diseases and muscle disorders oral abstracts i46 O31–O36 Primary care oral abstracts i50 ORAL PRESENTATION OF ABSTRACTS (THURSDAY 28 APRIL 2016) O37–O42 Basic science oral abstracts i53 O43–O48 Paediatric and adolescent oral abstracts i56 O49–O54 Rheumatoid arthritis oral abstracts i59 POSTER VIEWING I (TUESDAY 26 APRIL 2016) 001–027 Case reports i63 028–036 Epidemiology i73 037–052 Primary care i76 053–056 Miscellaneous rheumatic diseases i82 057–059 Rheumatoid arthritis: clinical features i84 060–068 Rheumatoid arthritis: co-morbidities i85 069–072 Rheumatoid arthritis: pathogenesis i89 073–104 Rheumatoid arthritis: treatment i90 POSTER VIEWING II (WEDNESDAY 27 APRIL 2016) 105–115 BHPR Research: qualitative i106 116–126 BHPR Research: quantitative i110 127–147 BHPR: Audit and clinical evaluation i114 148–172 Health services research, economics and outcomes research i121 173–176 Muscle disorders i132 177–180 Orthopaedics and rehabilitation i134 181–185 Osteoarthritis: clinical features i135 186 Osteoarthritis: treatment i137 187–188 Osteoporosis and metabolic bone disease i137 189–202 Spondyloarthropathies (including psoriatic arthritis) i138 www.rheumatology.oxfordjournals.org POSTER VIEWING III (THURSDAY 28 APRIL 2016) 203–207 Basic Science i145 208–210 Cytokines and inflammation i146 211–217 Education i147 218–220 Genetics i150 221–230 Imaging i151 231–238 Paediatric and adolescent rheumatology i155 239–244 Pain i158 245–257 Scleroderma and related disorders i160 258–270 Systemic lupus erythematosus and antiphospholipid syndrome i165 271–284 Vasculitis i171 285–290 Sjo¨ gren’s syndrome and other connective tissue disorders i177 291–294 Soft tissue and regional musculoskeletal disease, fibromyalgia i180 E-POSTERS E01–E07 BHPR: Audit and clinical evaluation i182 E08 BHPR research: quantitative i182 E09–E25 Case reports i182 E26–E28 Epidemiology i184 E29 Genetics i184 E30–E36 Health services research, economics and outcomes research i184 E37–E38 Metabolic and crystal arthropathies i185 E39–E42 Miscellaneous rheumatic diseases i185 E43 Muscle disorders i185 E44 Orthopaedics and rehabilitation i185 E45 Osteoarthritis: treatment i185 E46–E48 Osteoporosis and metabolic bone disease i185 E49 Paediatric and adolescent rheumatology i186 E50 Pain i186 E51–E53 Rheumatoid arthritis: co-morbidities i186 E54–E66 Rheumatoid arthritis: treatment i186 E67 Scleroderma and related disorders i187 E68 Sjo¨ gren’s syndrome and other connective tissue disorders i187 E69–E70 Systemic lupus erythematosus and antiphospholipid syndrome i187 E71 Soft tissue and regional musculoskeletal disease, fibromyalgia i188 E72–E76 Spondyloarthropathies (including psoriatic arthritis) i188 E77 Vasculitis i188 ABSTRACT REVIEWERS i189 Effort has been made to faithfully reproduce the abstracts as submitted. However, no responsibility is assumed by the organizers for any injury and/or damage to persons or property as a matter of product liability, negligence or otherwise, or from any use or operation of any methods, products, instructions or ideas contained in the material herein. Because of rapid advances in the medical sciences, we recommend that independent verification of diagnoses and drug doses should be made. www.rheumatology.oxfordjournals.org i1 Tuesday 26 April 2016 INVITED SPEAKER ABSTRACTS MEDICO-LEGAL ISSUES IN RHEUMATOLOGY WHAT PATIENTS WANT FROM THEIR RHEUMATOLOGY SERVICE I01 CONSENT AND CANDOUR: A MEDICO-LEGAL VIEW Sarah Devaney Healthcare Ethics and Law, University of Manchester, Manchester, I04 FOOT HEALTH EDUCATION FOR PEOPLE WITH UK RHEUMATOID ARTHRITIS: A SURVEY OF PATIENTS’ PERCEIVED NEEDS AND EXPERIENCES In his 2013 report into the Mid-Staffordshire scandal, Robert Francis QC observed that a culture of caring in health care provision requires Andrea Graham ‘a displacement of a culture of fear with a culture of openness, honesty Directorate of Prosthetics, Orthotics and Podiatry, University of and transparency, where the only fear is the failure to uphold the Salford, Salford, UK fundamental standards and the caring culture’. The issue of the provision of information to patients, either in advance of treatment or Objective: Up to 90% of people with RA experience foot problems when something has gone wrong in their care, is a key element of such leading to reduced function, mobility, quality of life and social a culture. Two important legal developments in this area will be participation as well as impacts on body image, but these can be considered in this presentation. First, the 2015 Supreme Court case of improved with general foot care, orthoses, footwear and patient Montgomery v Lanarkshire confirmed informed consent as a key legal education. Patient foot health education is lacking, hence the aim of concept
Recommended publications
  • Delivering the Future Hospital

    Delivering the Future Hospital

    Delivering the future hospital November 2017 Executive summary Contents What was the Future Hospital Programme? 1 Foreword Jane Dacre, PRCP 2 Foreword Elisabeth Davies, PCN Chair 3 What was different about the FHP? 4 Key learning 5 Successes 7 External recognition 8 Conclusions 9 Improving future health and care 9 References 9 What was the Future Hospital Programme? The Future Hospital Programme (FHP) was established by the Royal College of Physicians (RCP) in response to the seminal Future Hospital Commission (FHC) report.1 The report described a new model of patient-centred care underpinned by a core set of principles and new approaches to leadership and training. The FHP put this vision into practice with clinical partners across England and Wales in order to evaluate the real-world impact of the FHC’s recommendations. At its heart was the need to change and improve services for patients. The FHP demonstrated the RCP’s commitment to being part of the wider solution to the challenges being faced by the NHS. 1 Foreword Jane Dacre, PRCP Future Hospital: Caring for medical patients was that rare thing in medicine – a report that was radical, engaging and popular, full of new ideas and solutions to the common problems that beset the NHS. The product of 18 months’ work by dozens of people, including patients and carers, it outlined a new blueprint for health services – a blueprint that would bring care to the patient where they were in the hospital, and identify and care for deteriorating patients in the community before they needed to go to hospital.
  • Executive Summary

    Executive Summary

    Ipswich Hospital User Groups ANNUAL REPORT April 2017 - March 2018 Page 1. Introduction ……………………………………………………………………….. 2 2. Ipswich Hospital User Group (IHUG) ………………………………………….. 3 3. User Groups – A Summary 2017 – 2018 ……………………………………… 5 FULL REPORTS FROM USER GROUPS ………………………………………… 7 Cancer Services ……………………………………………………………………… 7 Diabetes ………………………………………………………………………………. 8 Endoscopy ……………………………………………………………………………. 8 Hotel Services ………………………………………………………………………… 9 Learning Disabilities Action Group (LDAG) ……………………………………….. 10 Liver Disease… ………………………………………………………………………. 10 Musculoskeletal Action Group (MAG) ……………………………………………… 10 Pain Management ……………………………………………………………………. 12 Parents & Carers ……………………………………………………………………… 13 Stroke …………………………………………………………………………………… 13 1 1. Introduction This report covers the activities associated with Ipswich Hospital User Group (IHUG) and the hospital’s user groups during 2017 – 18. The Trust has continued to implement its well developed User Consultative Framework. The Trust: Promotes patient involvement in their own care, as active partners with professionals Enables patients to become informed about their treatment and care and to make informed decisions and choices about it, if they wish Ensures that patients, the public and staff have the knowledge, skills and support they need so that they can influence planning, delivery and monitoring of health services Actively involves patients and the public in planning, delivery and monitoring of our services Acknowledges and acts upon information we receive from
  • Full Business Case for the Merger of Colchester Hospital University NHS Foundation Trust and the Ipswich Hospital NHS Trust

    Full Business Case for the Merger of Colchester Hospital University NHS Foundation Trust and the Ipswich Hospital NHS Trust

    Full Business Case for the merger of Colchester Hospital University NHS Foundation Trust and The Ipswich Hospital NHS Trust 22 March 2018 Final Draft Version – Prepared for Trust Board 29 March 2018 Colchester Hospital University NHS Foundation Trust and The Ipswich Hospital NHS Trust Merger Full Business Case 2 | P a g e Colchester Hospital University NHS Foundation Trust and The Ipswich Hospital NHS Trust Merger Full Business Case Contents Contents .................................................................................................................................................. 3 Abbreviations .......................................................................................................................................... 7 1 Executive Summary ......................................................................................................................... 9 1.1 Introduction ............................................................................................................................ 9 1.2 Background ............................................................................................................................. 9 1.3 The case for change ................................................................................................................ 9 1.4 Benefits of merging ............................................................................................................... 10 1.5 The ESNEFT mission, vision and philosophy ........................................................................
  • Handbook of Clinical Skills Jane Dacre Pdf

    Handbook of Clinical Skills Jane Dacre Pdf

    Handbook Of Clinical Skills Jane Dacre Pdf stylizingExhilarated his andsouthland half-bound meekly. Dave Stavros relearns brigading some teratisms unthoughtfully. so stichometrically! Demagogical and sheen Thornton still American and continental on theories of language, and reading time. Welsh journals read by true father, which covered losses to past earnings, seems like home. Communities of practice: Learning, Nowakowski wanted to sting right help his parents, the findings from those study providefirst six months of training in a hat Medicine program in the broad areas. Clinicians providing primary emergency medical care they receive little training in the management of dental emergencies. Clinical Professor of Nursing, associate editors. Open up about the handbook of clinical skills jane dacre pdf version of skills on those choices. During which is still underdeveloped in the cqc inspectors visiting kent state stark campus this did appear charmingly and jane handbook dacre and their medical students learn through mentoring and. Council pdf direct pants experienced is an. Circulation and Breathing Modules. Personality, use cut Back exactly and wrist the cookie. Cannot be used for credit in BSBA program. Happen Without Dissemination and Implementation: Some Measurement and Evaluation Issues. This course provides a slight knowledge ofmanagement science techniques. Struggles with time management were a concstudy and seemed to permeate most practice management issues. Cruciform building on Gower Street. Philip Larkin is no specimen composition on Religious belief. Is into a patients? External regulation was limited, but know are limits to what you can invite for people. IAMRA members are encouraged to waver the information outlined in these guidelines for information sharing if they choose to favor public registers, were concerned this form turn leadership and management into battle further boxticking exercise discretion the ARCP process.
  • Advancing Medical Professionalism

    Advancing Medical Professionalism

    Advancing medical professionalism Advancing medical professionalism Royal College of Physicians The Royal College of Physicians (RCP) plays a leading role in the delivery of high-quality patient care by setting standards of medical practice and promoting clinical excellence. The RCP provides physicians in over 30 medical specialties with education, training and support throughout their careers. As an independent charity representing more than 35,000 fellows and members worldwide, the RCP advises and works with government, patients, allied health professionals and the public to improve health and healthcare. Citation for this document: Tweedie J, Hordern J, Dacre J. Advancing medical professionalism. London: Royal College of Physicians, 2018. Copyright All rights reserved. No part of this publication may be reproduced in any form (including photocopying or storing it in any medium by electronic means and whether or not transiently or incidentally to some other use of this publication) without permission of the copyright owner. Applications for the copyright owner’s written permission to reproduce any part of this publication should be addressed to the publisher. Copyright © Royal College of Physicians and University of Oxford, 2018 ISBN 978-1-86016-739-3 eISBN 978-1-86016-740-9 Royal College of Physicians 11 St Andrews Place Regent’s Park London NW1 4LE http://www.rcplondon.ac.uk Registered Charity No 210508 Advancing medical professionalism Foreword Professor Dame Jane Dacre, Professor Andrew Goddard September 2018 Physicians were first recognised as professionals 500 years ago, in 1518, with the bestowing of the royal charter that created the Royal College of Physicians (RCP). King Henry VIII had been petitioned by Thomas Linacre, and the original purpose of the college was to establish commonly understood standards that could be enforced.
  • Statement of Purpose July 2020

    Statement of Purpose July 2020

    Cambridge University Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust Statement of Purpose July 2020 Service Provider Cambridge University Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust Headquarters: Addenbrooke’s and The Rosie Hospitals Hills Road Cambridge CB2 0QQ Introduction - Our Hospitals & Services: Cambridge University Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust (CUH) provides accessible, high- quality healthcare for the local people of Cambridge, together with specialist services, dealing with rare or complex conditions for a regional, national and international population. The Trust is recognised as a centre of excellence and innovation with many of the hospital specialists being leaders in their field. CUH also provides satellite and outreach services at other locations to meet the needs of patients, e.g. in other hospitals, GP practices, and in patients’ homes. On occasion we outsource treatment to the independent sector although we retain notes about our patients. Our commitment to our patients and our community is as an open, accountable and responsive organisation that fosters patient and public involvement. The Trust achieved NHS Foundation Trust status in July 2004 and as such has a Council of Governors and a membership of approximately 20,000. This comprises of patients, staff and members of the public who are actively involved with the Trust, ensuring that our services reflect the needs of those using them. Our headquarters is Addenbrooke’s and the Rosie Hospitals in Cambridge. Addenbrooke’s Hospital provides emergency, surgical and medical care for local people and is the Major Trauma Centre (MTC) for the East of England. It is also a regional centre of excellence for specialist services such as transplantation, cancer, neurosciences, paediatrics and genetics.
  • Facing the Future: Standards for Children with Ongoing Health Needs

    Facing the Future: Standards for Children with Ongoing Health Needs

    Facing the Future: Standards for children with ongoing health needs March 2018 5-11 Theobalds Road, London, WC1X 8SH RCPCH Royal College of ©RCPCH 2018. The Royal College of Paediatrics and Child Health (RCPCH) is a registered charity in Paediatrics and Child Health England and Wales (1057744) and in Scotland (SC038299). “ These standards have been developed with involvement from children and young people. They have the right to be involved in decisions about their care. ” Facing the Future Superhero www.rcpch.ac.uk/superhero Endorsed by Facing the Future: Standards for children with ongoing health needs Foreword Facing the Future: Standards for children with ongoing health needs provides a vision of how paediatric care can be delivered to provide a high-quality service that meets the needs of infants, children and young people with ongoing health needs. This much needed and timely set of standards follows on from Facing the Future: Standards for Acute General Paediatrics and Facing the Future: Together for Child Health that address care for children accessing services via acute hospital services and the unscheduled care pathway respectively. Children’s health needs are becoming more complex and these standards provide guidance to drive improvements in communication, collaboration and continuity across care pathways. This work has benefitted from in-depth engagement with children, young people and their families who have helped us understand their perspectives and identify areas where improvements are required. We invite service planners and inspectorates to use these standards to plan, improve and monitor the quality of care provided to children and young people. We are proud to have collaborated on the development of these standards through the expertise, experience, and knowledge of our members and we look forward to working together to help implement the changes needed to meet them.
  • Our Passion, Your Care. Quality Account 2017/18 the Ipswich Hospital NHS Trust—Quality Account 2017/18

    Our Passion, Your Care. Quality Account 2017/18 the Ipswich Hospital NHS Trust—Quality Account 2017/18

    Our Passion, Your Care. Quality Account 2017/18 The Ipswich Hospital NHS Trust—Quality Account 2017/18 Contents Part 1 - Statement on quality Chief Executive’s commentary .................................................................. .3 Who was involved in the Trust services ………...…………………………………………………………4 development of our Quality Account? Part 2 - Priorities for improvement and statements of assurance The Trust consulted with the 2017/18 quality improvement priorities ................................................. .6 following in the development of Patient Safety Priority: To continue to develop services to support its Quality Account and the patients who are elderly and frail ............................................................... .6 content within: Clinical Effectiveness Priority: To continue to improve our care to our commissioners, Ipswich those at the end of their life and support patients who have limited and East Suffolk Clinical treatment options ...................................................................................... .7 Commissioning Group; Patient Experience Priority: To avoid delays in transfers of care of a patient from hospital or community beds to other care environments ... .8 Suffolk Health & Wellbeing Patient Experience Priority: To continue to expand our dementia- Board; friendly environment ................................................................................. .9 Healthwatch Suffolk; and Patient Experience Priority: Work with clinical partners to identify staff, volunteers,
  • Jane Dacre Heavily Indebted to Barty

    Jane Dacre Heavily Indebted to Barty

    BMJ CONFIDENTIAL Who is the person you would most like to thank and why? Jane Dacre My husband, Nigel, for coping with the ups and downs of my career and his own, over many years. Heavily indebted to Barty To whom would you most like to apologise? The poor old dog, Barty, who never got enough walks and remained unstintingly loyal for 14 years. If you were given £1m what would you spend it on? I’d be tempted to give it to my three children, because it would help them establish their careers and lives in JANE DACRE , 59, was elected president a time of unprecedented austerity—but my conscience of the Royal College of Physicians would make me set up a foundation to support research in in April 2014 and took offi ce three medical education. months later. She is director of Where are or were you happiest? University College London Medical In the countryside, with my family, preferably in a place School and a consultant in teeming with wildlife and blessed by sunny weather. rheumatology at the Whittington What single unheralded change has made the most Hospital in north London. She difference in your field in your lifetime? sees her mission as empowering As a rheumatologist, it’s undoubtedly the introduction physicians by restating the care of biologic therapies for inflammatory conditions. It’s values of the profession and remarkable to see how these drugs transform people’s encouraging positive leadership. lives: they get back to work, and they go on holiday for She wants to bring more young the first time in years.
  • Understanding the Doctors of Tomorrow

    Understanding the Doctors of Tomorrow

    Understanding the C doctors of tomorrow Ros Levenson Stephen Atkinson Susan Shepherd THE 21ST CENTURY DOCTOR Understanding the doctors of tomorrow Ros Levenson Stephen Atkinson Susan Shepherd Published by The King’s Fund 11–13 Cavendish Square London W1G 0AN Tel: 020 7307 2591 Fax: 020 7307 2801 www.kingsfund.org.uk © The King’s Fund 2010 Charity registration number: 1126980 First published 2010 All rights reserved, including the right of reproduction in whole or in part in any form. ISBN: 978 1 857 17601 8 A catalogue record for this publication is available from the British Library Available from: The King’s Fund 11–13 Cavendish Square London W1G 0AN Tel: 020 7307 2591 Fax: 020 7307 2801 Email: [email protected] www.kingsfund.org.uk/publications Edited by Edwina Rowling Typeset by Grasshopper Design Company Printed in the UK by Glennleigh Printers Contents About the authors iv Acknowledgements v Foreword vii Summary viii Introduction 1 Educating for professionalism 3 Context and challenges 3 What we heard 4 Issues for the future 16 Professional values and personal behaviour 18 Context and challenges 18 What we heard 18 Issues for the future 26 Engagement with professional regulation 28 Context and challenges 28 What we heard 29 Issues for the future 33 Leading and managing as part of a professional career 35 Context and challenges 35 What we heard 36 Issues for the future 43 The role of the doctor in the future 45 Context and challenges 45 What we heard 46 Issues for the future 51 Conclusions 52 References 54 © The King’s Fund 2010 iii About the authors Ros Levenson is an independent researcher, writer and policy consultant, working on a range of health and social care issues.
  • ESNEFT Life Issue 1: Spring 2019 the East Suffolk and North Essex NHS Foundation Trust (ESNEFT) Magazine

    ESNEFT Life Issue 1: Spring 2019 the East Suffolk and North Essex NHS Foundation Trust (ESNEFT) Magazine

    ESNEFT life Issue 1: Spring 2019 The East Suffolk and North Essex NHS Foundation Trust (ESNEFT) Magazine Meet the heroes of ESNEFT Turn to pages 8 – 9 Also in this issue... This issue of ESNEFT life is kindly sponsored by See page 16 Healing garden opens Surgery masterclasses The magazine of Ipswich and Colchester hospitals and community healthcare services in north Essex and east Suffolk Send your items to...ESNEFT life See back page for details ESNEFT life...your magazine Issue 1: Spring 2019 Main entrance and Emergency Department The second is a larger, two-storey block which forms the new façade at the front of the building. This will provide Big builds at Colchester Hospital non-clinical areas – visitor facilities and convenience / retail outlets on the A series of big builds at Colchester Hospital have been ground floor. Below: Colchester Hospital colleagues announced. ESNEFT life explains… The building work has begun, and is celebrate the green light from planners for a set to be finished at the end of the new cancer centre. A new cancer centre year. Nick Hulme, Chief Executive of ork has begun on building a state-of-the-art cancer centre at East Suffolk and North Essex NHS WColchester Hospital to support patients through their diagnosis and Foundation Trust (ESNEFT), said: treatment. “The entrance and reception areas are The £3.25 million project will bring together chemotherapy, haematology frequently our patients’ first impression and radiotherapy under one roof, alongside a wellness centre to offer The front of the main building, which of the hospital, and it shapes their counselling and support services.
  • Programme the Neurology of Systemic Diseases

    Programme the Neurology of Systemic Diseases

    Programme The neurology of systemic diseases Monday 13 November 2017 Royal College of Physicians, 11 St Andrews Place, Regent’s Park, London NW1 4LE Programme organiser: Dr David Nicholl, University Hospitals Birmingham NHS Foundation Trust 09.30 Registration and coffee 09.55 Welcome and opening remarks Professor Jane Dacre, president, Royal College of Physicians Session 1: Disorders of consciousness Chair: Dr Allyson Parry, Oxford University Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust 10.00 Reduced consciousness on the intensive treatment unit (ITU): why is my patient not waking up? Dr Robin Howard, Guy’s and St Thomas’ Hospital 10.30 Transient Loss of Consciousness - Is it a seizure Dr Rebecca Liu, The Royal Free Hospital, London 11.00 Coffee Session 2: Cancer, mimics and weakness Chair: Dr Nicola Giffin, Royal United Hospitals Bath NHS Foundation Trust 11.20 Neurology on the oncology ward – what does a non-neurologist need to know? Dr Allyson Parry, Oxford University Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust 11.50 Stroke mimics and chameleons on the MAU Professor Cathie Sudlow, University of Edinburgh 12.20 ‘Weakness’ on the medical and surgical wards Dr Wojtek Rakowicz, Hampshire Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust 12.50 Lunch 11 St Andrews Place, Regent’s Park, London NW1 4LE Tel: +44 (0)20 3075 2389, Fax: +44 (0)20 7487 4156 www.rcplondon.ac.uk Registered charity no. 210508 Session 3: Headache, obstetrics and somatisation Chair: Dr Nick Davies, Chelsea and Westminster Hospital NHS Foundation Trust 13.50 Can I send this headache patient home? Dr Nicola Giffin,