DOCSLIB.ORG

Government of Saint Lucia

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Government of Saint Lucia Received by NSD/FARA Registration Unit 01/29/2019 6:23: 14 PM '"~-·~'"""'" 'f.,, OFFICE OF THE* J'RIME MINISTER Greaham Louisy Administrative Building Tell (7511) .., •• •.• Waterfron~ Castries Saint Lucia July 10, 2018 The Honorable Mike Pompeo The Honorable James Mattis Secretary of State Secretary of Defense United States Department of State United States Department of Defense 2201 C Street, NW 1400 Defense Pentagon Washington, DC 20520 Washington, DC 20301 Dear Secretary Pompeo and Secretary Mattis: The Governments of Saint Lucia an'd the United States (U.S.) have enjoyed a longstanding and positive relationship, and have cooperated in many areas of mutual interest. Both Saint Lucia and the U.S. share a vested interest in advancing trade and securi~1ssues, the latter including combating international crime and narcotics trafficking. We btJt_h share " similar concerns regarding Venezuela, and it is here that Saint Lucia's.,recorcl on that country matches that of not only the U.S. but of other allies, including Canada, the European Union, and many in Latin America. Our position on Venezuela has allowed us to become an active member of the Lima Group and our voting record at the Organization of American ./ States (OAS) on Venezuela speaks for itself. Regrettably, Saint Lucia finds itself under threat from those involved in the illicit mpyement of goods, including from Venezuela. Saint Lucia's geographical location mak.es it an appealing transit point for those involved in the narcotics trade, and rising crime is threatening our socio-economic stability. While the Government of Saint Lucia has long valued security assistance from the U.S., the absence of support followiO:g imposition of the Leahy Law in 2013 has left us critically vulnerable. As we have taken significant remedial measures under the current Government of Saint Lucia, we endeavor to regain eligibility for assistance from the Department of State and Department of Defense. Background Since 2013, the Government of Saint Lucia has not received training or material assistance for its police force from the U.S. This is as a result of Leahy Law sanctions, levied in Received by NSD/F ARA Registration Unit 0 I /29/2019 6:23: 14 PM Received by NSD/F ARA Registration Unit 01/29/2019 6:23: 14 PM response to alleged instances of gross violations of human rights (GVHR) that resulted from the implementation of an initiative by a past administration. From 2010 to 2011, 12 alleged extrajudicial killings were committed under the guise of Operation Restore Confidence (ORC), an ad hoc task force within the police department. The ORC special task force comprised a small group of officers under the command of the former Deputy -Commissioner of Police in charge of Operations and did not include the entire police force. Government Actions The following is a summary of actions undertaken by the government to address concerns shared by the U.S. and others as it relates to the enactment of the Leahy Jaw: 1. Caribbean Community Implementation Agency for Crime and Security (/MPACS)1 Since the U.S. government deemed the Coroner's inquest initiated by the Government of Saint Lucia as inadequate as it related to the actions to be taken against persons involved in the alleged extrajudicial killings under ORC, the Government, in August 2014, commissioned IMPACS to undertake an independent i1westigation into the circumstances that lead to the deaths. The IMPACS Report was presented to the former Government in February 2015, and subsequently transferred to the Director of Public Prosecutions (DPP) in March 2015. Z. Training af Law Enforcement Officers an Human Rights Members of the Royal Saint Lucia Police Force have been undergoing human rights sensitization in response to recommendations presented in the IMPACS report. Human rights lawyers and activists have been spearheading the human rights training of the officers. The training session included a training of trainers session, allowing for the continued learning and training of officers in human rights and professional Jaw enforcement behavior and practices. 3. Crown Prosecutions Service In October 2016, a new DPP was appointed and two new Crown Counsels have been employed by the current administration to address the resource constraints in the Office of the DPP. The Office of the DPP has also been strengthened by the addition of two career police officers to assist in the investigation of the cases referenced in the IMPACS report. 1 IMPACS, established in 2006, is the implementation arm of the Regional Architecture to manage CARICOM's action agenda on crime and security, and reports to the CARICOM Council of Ministers for National Security and Law Enforcement. 2 Received by NSD/F ARA Registration Unit 01/29/2019 6:23: 14 PM Received by NSD/F ARA Registration Unit Ol /29/2019 6:23: 14 PM 4. Strengthening of the Police Complaints Unit The Police. Complaints Unit has been strengthened with the reassignment of additional investigators to this unit and a senior officer has been appointed to manage the department. The Government is in the process of establishing thi.s unit as a fully independent body to lead all investigations of police-involved abuses, killings and reports. A Memorandum of Understanding is being finalized between tlie Office of the DPP and the Police Force to coordinate in the investigations of police-involved abuses and killings. In the interim, three officers have been dispatched to the DPP's office. The direct result of this new relationship has seen one officer charged with manslaughter within four weeks of a fatal shooting, while another was sent to the Coroners Court for arbitration. 5. Use ofForce Policy In October 2015, the Government of Saint Lucia approved a Use of Force Policy, which is designed to provide structure and direction to Saint Lucia's law enforcement officers as it pertains to the appropriate use of force while on duty. This policy applies to the Royal Saint Lucia Police Force, gazette and non-gazette officers, Special Reserve Police, Special Constables and Peace Officers. The policy, approved by Cabinet in October 2015, was recently reviewed and is now being implemented. 6. Forensic laboratory The forensic lab in Saint Lucia, which had been temporarily closed, resumed operations in February 2017. The lab has been active in assisting the Royal Saint Lucia Police Force with investigations. 7. Witness Protection (Special Measures) Bill The Government has proposed a Witness Protection (Special Measures) Bill to protect the identity of witnesses who may be at risk from providing testimony on criminal activities. The government is in the process of engaging in consultations on the proposed bill to then be approved in the near future. The above remedial measures highlight the following: • The Government of Saint Lucia is committed to not only addressing crime, but ensuring the actions that resulted in the imposition of the Leahy Law sanctions are not repeated; • The Government has undertaken the necessary .independent investigation into the deaths that resulted during ORC; • The findings of this independent investigation, the IMPACS Report, have been transferred to the Office of the DPP to ensure prosecutions, where required; 3 Received by NSD/FARA Registration Unit O1/29/2019 6:23: 14 PM Received by NSD/FARA Registration Unit 0 1/29/2019 6:23: 14 PM • The Government has done everything within its authority to ensure that persons implicated in the lMPACS Reports are held accountable; and While the Constitution of Saint Lucia enshrines three separate arms of state, the Executive, Legislative and the Judicial; with the administration restricted from any interference in the judiciary process; the administration is confident that it has provided the Judicial branch ·with all of the necessary tool.s needed and that this branch of government is proceeding appropriately and expeditiously. Current Crime Condition Security continues to be a major priority for the Government of Saint Lucia, with border control weakness resulting from the influx of drugs, anns and unsavory criminal characters to the island. As stated in the March 2018 lNCSR II Report published by the U.S. Department of State, "St. Lucia is a transit point for illegal drugs going toward the United States and Europe" and "illicit drug trafficking by organized crime rings and the laundering of drug proceeds by domestic and foreign criminal elements remain serious problems far St. Lucia". This situation .poses a threat to the economic and social stability of Saint Lucia and requires immediate redress with the assistance of friendly partners like the U.S., capable of supporting our efforts to curtail this problem. As mentioned prior, developments in Venezuela over the past two years have had a direct and deleterious impact on Saint Lucia. The deteriorating economic condition, volatile political situation and the humani.taria.n crisis in Venezuela has resulted in the migration of undesirable elements and a corresponding influx of drugs and anns into Saint Lucia, posing not only a national security threat but regional security threat as well. Saint Lucia's inability to access training from the U.S. government for its police force, and to outfit law enforcement in the face of criminal elements that are better armed and have greater access to intelligence than local police have placed law enforcement, the political leadership and most importantly the citizens of Saint Lucia in danger and at risk. Consequently, the U.S. is also at risk as the Caribbean is considered to be its third border. Request for Support The Government of Saint Lucia acknowledges that the imposition of the Leahy Law has accomplished its objective; with my administration taking all the necessary remediation actions and implementing measures to ensure past errors are not repeated. It is time for . our governments to work together to achieve common objectives - securing our borders and strengthening the police force of Saint Lucia.
Load more

Recommended publications
  • Enhancing Leahy Law Human Rights Enforcement Through a Private Cause of Action
    Valparaiso University Law Review Volume 51 Number 3 Spring 2017 pp.831-879 Spring 2017 To The People: Enhancing Leahy Law Human Rights Enforcement Through a Private Cause of Action Jess Hunter-Bowman Valparaiso University Follow this and additional works at: https://scholar.valpo.edu/vulr Part of the Law Commons Recommended Citation Jess Hunter-Bowman, To The People: Enhancing Leahy Law Human Rights Enforcement Through a Private Cause of Action, 51 Val. U. L. Rev. 831 (2017). Available at: https://scholar.valpo.edu/vulr/vol51/iss3/9 This Notes is brought to you for free and open access by the Valparaiso University Law School at ValpoScholar. It has been accepted for inclusion in Valparaiso University Law Review by an authorized administrator of ValpoScholar. For more information, please contact a ValpoScholar staff member at [email protected]. Hunter-Bowman: To The People: Enhancing Leahy Law Human Rights Enforcement Throu TO THE PEOPLE: ENHANCING LEAHY LAW HUMAN RIGHTS ENFORCEMENT THROUGH A PRIVATE CAUSE OF ACTION I. INTRODUCTION A sudden burst of machine-gun fire tore through the walls of Alfonso Bolivar Tuberquia’s home in rural Colombia.1 Seconds later, a grenade exploded, killing his wife, Sandra.2 Alfonso’s two young children miraculously survived the hail of bullets and shrapnel, prompting paramilitary commanders and their Colombian military allies to callously discuss what to do with the children.3 “Assassinate the kids, but silently,” a paramilitary commander ordered.4 A paramilitary fighter complied; he “took the child by the hair and slit her throat with a machete.”5 In total, eight civilians, including three children, were brutally massacred before paramilitaries and troops from the Colombian military’s Seventeenth Brigade marched out of San José de Apartadó.6 Days after the massacre, community members and human rights organizations alerted the U.S.
    [Show full text]
  • Unmatched Power, Unmet Principles: the Human Rights Dimensions of US Training of Foreign Military and Police Forces
    Unmatched Power, Unmet Principles: The Human Rights Dimensions of US Training of Foreign Military and Police Forces Amnesty International USA Publications Cover: Johor, Malaysia—U.S. Marines and Malaysian soldiers participate in a simulated amphibious assault during the seventh annual Cooperation Afloat Readiness and Training 2001 exercise July 24. CARAT exercises employ simulated military scenarios designed to prepare U.S. and Malaysian forces to meet future challenges of disaster relief and humanitarian aid. CARAT, a series of bilateral exercises, takes place throughout the Western Pacific each summer. It aims to increase regional cooperation and promote interoperability with each country. The countries participating in CARAT 01 were: Indonesia, Singapore, Philippines, Thailand, Malaysia and Brunei. (U.S. Navy photo by Photographer's Mate 2nd Class Erin A. Zocco) In the mid 1990s, the US government revealed that for much of the previous decade the US Army's School of Americas (SOA) had used training manuals that advocated practices such as torture, extortion, kidnapping, and execution. While some curriculum changes have been implemented at this training institute, no one has ever been held accountable for the unlawful training manuals or for the behavior of SOA graduates. Further, the School of the Americas (now known as the Western Hemisphere Institute for Security Cooperation) is only one small part of vast and complex network of US programs for training foreign military and police forces that is often shrouded in secrecy. Such secrecy puts the United States at risk of training forces or individuals that commit human rights abuses. The United States government now trains at least 100,000 foreign police and soldiers from more than 150 countries each year in US military and policing doctrine and methods, as well as war-fighting skills, at the cost of tens of millions of dollars.
    [Show full text]
  • U.S. Military Aid to Israel an Analysis of the U.S
    1 U.S. Military Aid to Israel An Analysis of the U.S. Leahy Laws ZAREFAH RAMZY BAROUD A PROJECT SUBMITTED IN PARTIAL FULFILLMENT OF THE REQUIREMENT FOR THE DEGREE OF MASTER OF POLICY STUDIES THE UNIVERSITY OF WASHINGTON BOTHELL AUGUST, 2020. ADVISOR: DR. CAMILLE WALSH U.S. MILITARY AID TO ISRAEL 2 TABLE OF CONTENTS INTRODUCTION 3 BACKGROUND 9 LITERATURE REVIEW 15 METHODOLOGY 25 RESULTS: SECTION I 29 Cruel, Inhumane, And Degrading Treatment Or Punishment 29 RESULTS: SECTION II 33 Prolonged Detention Without Charges And Trial 33 RESULTS: SECTION III 43 Causing The Disappearance Of Persons And Clandestine Detention Of Those Persons 43 RESULTS: SECTION IV 46 Flagrant Denial Of The Right To Life, Liberty, Or The Security Of Person 46 CONCLUSION 49 REFERENCES 55 U.S. MILITARY AID TO ISRAEL 3 INTRODUCTION In this research, I will consider whether United States military aid to Israel meets the premise of the Leahy Laws. The following research aims to provide a legal analysis of the applicability of the Leahy Laws to the pertinent case of Israel. I will begin with a background discussion of reports recounting the Israeli military offensive, Operation Protective Edge of 2014. Secondly, I will provide an analysis of the military court system in the West Bank and Gaza and reports documenting the abuse of Palestinian minors, as well as Palestinian relief and charity workers, inside Israeli prisons and detention facilities. Lastly, I will analyze reports documenting the efforts by Israeli occupation forces to ethnically cleanse the Palestinian population in East Jerusalem, and those within historic Palestine.
    [Show full text]
  • Policy Brief
    POLICY BRIEF Policy Brief July 22, 2013 Investing in Freedom: Democracy Support in the U.S. Budget by Sarah Trister, Manager of Congressional Affairs Overview The U.S. Congress should fully fund the administration’s $47.8 billion request for base international affairs for Fiscal Year (FY) 2014.1 This request represents a 6% reduction from FY 12 funding levels and a 14% reduction from the FY 13 request, reflecting the difficult budget environment that lawmakers currently face.2 The foreign affairs budget, which represents less than 1% of the annual U.S. budget, provides an invaluable set of tools for advancing U.S. foreign policy interests. The relatively modest investments that fall under the international affairs budget bear great returns, as the American government helps develop stable, democratic partners that cooperate on trade, security, immigration, and economic issues. Amid weariness among the American people with military engagement overseas, diplomacy is an inherently less costly means of advancing interests. In repressive countries, the smallest amount of U.S. assistance can bring hope and provide a lifeline to those who face imprisonment, torture, or even death for speaking out in support of freedom, while helping to engender the next generation of potential leaders. Recent developments in the Middle East, Russia, Burma and elsewhere show the importance of robust, strategic, and flexible funding for the United States to respond effectively to quickly changing situations on the ground and continue to play a leadership role in the international community. The budget plans produced by the House and Senate for FY 14 differ greatly from one another and from the President’s request.
    [Show full text]
  • Improving Implementation of the Department of Defense Leahy Law
    Improving Implementation of the Department of Defense Leahy Law Michael J. McNerney, Jonah Blank, Becca Wasser, Jeremy Boback, Alexander Stephenson C O R P O R A T I O N For more information on this publication, visit www.rand.org/t/RR1737 Library of Congress Cataloging-in-Publication Data is available for this publication. ISBN: 978-0-8330-9696-8 Published by the RAND Corporation, Santa Monica, Calif. © Copyright 2017 RAND Corporation R® is a registered trademark. Cover: U.S. Marine Corps photo by Cpl. Reece Lodder. Limited Print and Electronic Distribution Rights This document and trademark(s) contained herein are protected by law. This representation of RAND intellectual property is provided for noncommercial use only. Unauthorized posting of this publication online is prohibited. Permission is given to duplicate this document for personal use only, as long as it is unaltered and complete. Permission is required from RAND to reproduce, or reuse in another form, any of its research documents for commercial use. For information on reprint and linking permissions, please visit www.rand.org/pubs/permissions. The RAND Corporation is a research organization that develops solutions to public policy challenges to help make communities throughout the world safer and more secure, healthier and more prosperous. RAND is nonprofit, nonpartisan, and committed to the public interest. RAND’s publications do not necessarily reflect the opinions of its research clients and sponsors. Support RAND Make a tax-deductible charitable contribution at www.rand.org/giving/contribute www.rand.org Preface The U.S. Department of Defense (DoD) provides assistance to foreign defense organizations around the world to achieve common security goals.
    [Show full text]
  • Enhancing Leahy Law Human Rights Enforcement Through a Private Cause of Action
    View metadata, citation and similar papers at core.ac.uk brought to you by CORE provided by Valparaiso University Valparaiso University Law Review Volume 51 Number 3 Spring 2017 pp.831-879 Spring 2017 To The People: Enhancing Leahy Law Human Rights Enforcement Through a Private Cause of Action Jess Hunter-Bowman Valparaiso University Follow this and additional works at: https://scholar.valpo.edu/vulr Part of the Law Commons Recommended Citation Jess Hunter-Bowman, To The People: Enhancing Leahy Law Human Rights Enforcement Through a Private Cause of Action, 51 Val. U. L. Rev. 831 (2017). Available at: https://scholar.valpo.edu/vulr/vol51/iss3/9 This Notes is brought to you for free and open access by the Valparaiso University Law School at ValpoScholar. It has been accepted for inclusion in Valparaiso University Law Review by an authorized administrator of ValpoScholar. For more information, please contact a ValpoScholar staff member at [email protected]. Hunter-Bowman: To The People: Enhancing Leahy Law Human Rights Enforcement Throu TO THE PEOPLE: ENHANCING LEAHY LAW HUMAN RIGHTS ENFORCEMENT THROUGH A PRIVATE CAUSE OF ACTION I. INTRODUCTION A sudden burst of machine-gun fire tore through the walls of Alfonso Bolivar Tuberquia’s home in rural Colombia.1 Seconds later, a grenade exploded, killing his wife, Sandra.2 Alfonso’s two young children miraculously survived the hail of bullets and shrapnel, prompting paramilitary commanders and their Colombian military allies to callously discuss what to do with the children.3 “Assassinate the kids, but silently,” a paramilitary commander ordered.4 A paramilitary fighter complied; he “took the child by the hair and slit her throat with a machete.”5 In total, eight civilians, including three children, were brutally massacred before paramilitaries and troops from the Colombian military’s Seventeenth Brigade marched out of San José de Apartadó.6 Days after the massacre, community members and human rights organizations alerted the U.S.
    [Show full text]
  • St. Lucia Country Report (2019), Available At
    [NAME] [FIRM] [ADDRESS] [PHONE NUMBER] [FAX NUMBER] UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF JUSTICE EXECUTIVE OFFICE FOR IMMIGRATION REVIEW IMMIGRATION COURT [CITY, STATE] __________________________________________ ) In the Matter of: ) ) File No.: A __________ __________ ) ) In removal proceedings ) __________________________________________) INDEX TO DOCUMENTATION OF COUNTRY CONDITIONS REGARDING PERSECUTION OF LGBTQ INDIVIDUALS IN SAINT LUCIA TAB SUMMARY GOVERNMENTAL SOURCES 1. [Excerpt] Saint Lucia, Criminal Code, Revised Edition (2005), Chapter 3.01. Sec. 133 Buggery, available at: http://www.govt.lc/media.govt.lc/www/resources/legislation/Criminal%20Code.pdf • “(1) A person who commits buggery commits an offence and is liable on conviction on indictment to imprisonment for— (a) life, if committed with force and without the consent of the other person; (b) ten years, in any other case. (2) Any person who attempts to commit buggery, or commits an assault with intent to commit buggery, commits an offence and is liable to imprisonment for 5 years. (3) In this section “buggery” means sexual intercourse per anus by a male person with another male person.” (p. 95) 2. [Excerpt] Saint Lucia, Criminal Code, Revised Edition (2005), Chapter 3.01. Sec. 132 Gross Indecency, available at: http://www.govt.lc/media.govt.lc/www/resources/legislation/Criminal%20Code.pdf TAB SUMMARY • “(1) A person who commits an act of gross indecency with another person commits an offence and is liable on conviction on indictment to imprisonment for 10 years or on summary conviction to 5 years. (2) Subsection (1) does not apply to an act of gross indecency committed in private between an adult male person and an adult female person, both of whom consent .
    [Show full text]
  • Investing in Freedom: Special Report
    Investing in Freedom: Analyzing the FY 2012 International Affairs Budget Request Special Report May 2011 Sarah Trister is the primary author of this year’s report. Freedom House Executive Director David J. Kramer, Director of Advocacy Paula Schriefer, and Director of Programs Robert Herman provided expertise and guidance throughout the process. Analytical background on recent democratic developments was provided by Freedom House publication Freedom in the World. Freedom House staff in Washington and in field offices around the world also offered valuable regional input. For additional Freedom House Special Reports, please see www.freedomhouse.org. Freedom House is an independent watchdog organization that supports the expansion of freedom around the world. Freedom House supports democratic change, monitors freedom, and advocates for democracy and human rights. Founded in 1941, Freedom House has long been a vigorous proponent of the right of all individuals to be free. Eleanor Roosevelt and Wendell Willkie served as Freedom House’s first honorary co-chairpersons. Table of Contents Overview .................................................................................................................................................................1 FY 2012 Foreign Assistance Request ...................................................................................................................3 Governing Justly and Democratically ..........................................................................................................4
    [Show full text]
  • How to Conduct Effective Counterterrorism That Reinforces Human Rights BLUEPRINT for U.S
    How to Conduct Effective Counterterrorism that Reinforces Human Rights BLUEPRINT FOR U.S. GOVERNMENT POLICY DECEMBER 2014 Human Rights First American ideals. Universal values. On human rights, the United States must be a beacon. Activists fighting for freedom around the globe continue to look to us for inspiration and count on us for support. Upholding human rights is not only a moral obligation; it’s a vital national interest. America is strongest when our policies and actions match our values. Human Rights First is an independent advocacy and action organization that challenges America to live up to its ideals. We believe American leadership is essential in the struggle for human rights so we press the U.S. government and private companies to respect human rights and the rule of law. When they don’t, we step in to demand reform, accountability and justice. Around the world, we work where we can best harness American influence to secure core freedoms. We know that it is not enough to expose and protest injustice, so we create the political environment and policy solutions necessary to ensure consistent respect for human rights. Whether we are protecting refugees, combating torture, or defending persecuted minorities, we focus not on making a point, but on making a difference. For over 30 years, we’ve built bipartisan coalitions and teamed up with frontline activists and lawyers to tackle issues that demand American leadership. Human Rights First is a nonprofit, nonpartisan international human rights organization based in New York and Washington D.C. To maintain our independence, we accept no government funding.
    [Show full text]