Los Pumas Project, Chile Technical Report Southern Hemisphere

Total Page:16

File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

Los Pumas Project, Chile Technical Report Southern Hemisphere Los Pumas Project, Chile Technical Report Prepared by Coffey Mining Pty Ltd on behalf of: Southern Hemisphere Mining Limited Effective Date: 20 December 2010 Qualified Person: Ian Dreyer, BSc (Geol), AuslMM MINEWPER00 Los Pumas Project, Chile Technical Report – 20 December 2010 Table of Contents 1 Summary ....................................................................................................................................8 1.1 Introduction .....................................................................................................................8 1.2 Preliminary Assessment ..................................................................................................8 1.3 Facilities ..........................................................................................................................9 1.4 Ownership ..................................................................................................................... 10 1.5 Geology and Mineralization ...........................................................................................11 1.6 Hydrogeology ................................................................................................................11 1.7 Status of Exploration .....................................................................................................12 1.8 Data Acquisition ............................................................................................................12 1.9 Data Reliability .............................................................................................................. 13 1.10 Mineral Resources ........................................................................................................13 1.11 Mining ........................................................................................................................... 15 1.11.1 In-Pit Resources ............................................................................................................. 15 1.11.2 Statement of Preliminary Assessment – Preliminary in Nature .................................... 17 1.12 Financial Evaluation ...................................................................................................... 18 1.13 Environmental Approval ................................................................................................ 18 1.14 Key Performance Indicators .......................................................................................... 19 1.15 Risk Analysis ................................................................................................................. 19 1.16 Conclusions and Recommendations ............................................................................. 20 2 Introduction .............................................................................................................................. 21 2.1 Scope of Report ............................................................................................................21 2.2 Principal Sources of Information....................................................................................21 2.3 Site Visit ........................................................................................................................ 21 2.4 Authors’ Qualifications and Experience ......................................................................... 22 2.5 Units of Measurements .................................................................................................22 2.6 Independence ...............................................................................................................22 2.7 Abbreviations ................................................................................................................24 3 Reliance on Other Experts ...................................................................................................... 25 4 Property Description and Location ........................................................................................26 4.1 Background ...................................................................................................................26 4.1.1 Economy ........................................................................................................................ 26 4.1.2 Legal ............................................................................................................................... 26 4.2 Area of the Property ......................................................................................................31 4.3 Project Location ............................................................................................................31 4.4 Type of Mineral Tenure .................................................................................................32 4.5 The nature and extent of the Titles ................................................................................34 4.6 Boundaries of Properties ...............................................................................................35 4.7 Outside Property Boundaries ........................................................................................35 4.8 Royalties / Agreements and Encumbrances .................................................................. 35 4.9 Environmental Liabilities and Permits ............................................................................ 35 Los Pumas Project, Chile Technical Report – 20 December 2010 5 Accessibility, Climate, Local Resources, Infrastructure and Physiography ....................... 36 5.1 Access .......................................................................................................................... 36 5.2 Physiography and Climate ............................................................................................36 5.3 Local Resources and Infrastructure ............................................................................... 36 6 History ...................................................................................................................................... 39 6.1 Ownership History .........................................................................................................39 6.2 Exploration History ........................................................................................................39 6.3 Resource History ...........................................................................................................39 6.4 Production History .........................................................................................................39 7 Geological Setting ................................................................................................................... 40 7.1 Regional Geology ..........................................................................................................40 7.2 Project Geology .............................................................................................................42 7.2.1 Huaylas Formation (Msh) ............................................................................................... 43 7.2.2 Lauca Formation (PIPI) .................................................................................................. 43 7.2.3 Taapaca Volcanic Complex (TVC) ................................................................................ 44 8 Deposit Types .......................................................................................................................... 45 9 Mineralization ........................................................................................................................... 46 10 Exploration ............................................................................................................................... 48 11 Drilling ...................................................................................................................................... 49 12 Sampling Method and Approach ............................................................................................ 50 13 Sample Preparation, Analyses and Security .........................................................................51 14 Data Verification ...................................................................................................................... 52 14.1 Assay ............................................................................................................................ 52 14.2 QAQC ........................................................................................................................... 52 14.2.1 Standard Data ................................................................................................................ 52 14.2.2 Duplicate Data ................................................................................................................ 52 14.2.3 Umpire Assays ............................................................................................................... 52 14.2.4 Blanks ............................................................................................................................. 52 15 Adjacent Properties ................................................................................................................. 56 16 MINERAL PROCESSING AND METALLURGICAL TESTING ................................................. 57 17 Mineral Resource and Mineral Reserve Estimates
Recommended publications
  • Alkalic-Type Epithermal Gold Deposit Model
    Alkalic-Type Epithermal Gold Deposit Model Chapter R of Mineral Deposit Models for Resource Assessment Scientific Investigations Report 2010–5070–R U.S. Department of the Interior U.S. Geological Survey Cover. Photographs of alkalic-type epithermal gold deposits and ores. Upper left: Cripple Creek, Colorado—One of the largest alkalic-type epithermal gold deposits in the world showing the Cresson open pit looking southwest. Note the green funnel-shaped area along the pit wall is lamprophyre of the Cresson Pipe, a common alkaline rock type in these deposits. The Cresson Pipe was mined by historic underground methods and produced some of the richest ores in the district. The holes that are visible along several benches in the pit (bottom portion of photograph) are historic underground mine levels. (Photograph by Karen Kelley, USGS, April, 2002). Upper right: High-grade gold ore from the Porgera deposit in Papua New Guinea showing native gold intergrown with gold-silver telluride minerals (silvery) and pyrite. (Photograph by Jeremy Richards, University of Alberta, Canada, 2013, used with permission). Lower left: Mayflower Mine, Montana—High-grade hessite, petzite, benleonardite, and coloradoite in limestone. (Photograph by Paul Spry, Iowa State University, 1995, used with permission). Lower right: View of north rim of Navilawa Caldera, which hosts the Banana Creek prospect, Fiji, from the portal of the Tuvatu prospect. (Photograph by Paul Spry, Iowa State University, 2007, used with permission). Alkalic-Type Epithermal Gold Deposit Model By Karen D. Kelley, Paul G. Spry, Virginia T. McLemore, David L. Fey, and Eric D. Anderson Chapter R of Mineral Deposit Models for Resource Assessment Scientific Investigations Report 2010–5070–R U.S.
    [Show full text]
  • Conservation of Biodiversity in Protected Areas of Shared Priority Ecoregions of Latin America and the Caribbean
    Inter-Agency Technical Committee of the Forum of Ministers of the Environment of Latin America and the Caribbean Twelfth Forum of Ministers of the Environment Distribution: of Latin America and the Caribbean Limited UNEP/LAC-IGWG.XII/TD.3 Bridgetown, Barbados 27 February, 2000 2nd to 7th March 2000 Original: English - Spanish A. Preparatory Meeting of Experts 2nd to 3rd March 2000 The World Bank United Nations Development Programme Conservation of Biodiversity in United Nations Protected Areas of Shared Environment Programme (ITC Coordinator) Priority Ecoregions of Latin America and the Caribbean Economic Commission for Latin America and the Caribbean Inter-American Development Bank Conservation and sustainable use of tropical rainforests of Latin America and the Caribbean This document was prepared by the Inter-Agency Technical Committee on the basis of the mandates of the Eleventh Meeting of the Forum of Ministers of the Environment of Latin America and the Caribbean (Lima, Peru, March 1998). The work was carried out by the United Nations Development Programme (UNDP) and the United Nations Environment Programme (UNEP), as the lead agencies, in coordination with the Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations (FAO). The purpose of the document is to provide the Forum with support for discussing and approving courses of action in the sphere of the Regional Action Plan for the period 2000-2001. UNEP/LAC-IGWG.XII/TD.4 Page i Table of Contents Chapter I. Conservation of Biodiversity in Protected Areas of Shared Priority Ecoregions of Latin America and the Caribbean................................................. 1 I. Introduction................................................................................................ 1 II. Development of priority theme lines ................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • La Calidad Y Accesibilidad Del Agua Potable Rural Chile: Arica – Parinacota Eileen Kapples SIT Study Abroad
    SIT Graduate Institute/SIT Study Abroad SIT Digital Collections Independent Study Project (ISP) Collection SIT Study Abroad Fall 2011 La Calidad y Accesibilidad del Agua Potable Rural Chile: Arica – Parinacota Eileen Kapples SIT Study Abroad Follow this and additional works at: https://digitalcollections.sit.edu/isp_collection Part of the Demography, Population, and Ecology Commons, Inequality and Stratification Commons, Natural Resources Management and Policy Commons, and the Water Resource Management Commons Recommended Citation Kapples, Eileen, "La Calidad y Accesibilidad del Agua Potable Rural Chile: Arica – Parinacota" (2011). Independent Study Project (ISP) Collection. 1168. https://digitalcollections.sit.edu/isp_collection/1168 This Unpublished Paper is brought to you for free and open access by the SIT Study Abroad at SIT Digital Collections. It has been accepted for inclusion in Independent Study Project (ISP) Collection by an authorized administrator of SIT Digital Collections. For more information, please contact [email protected]. La calidad y accesibilidad del agua potable rural Chile: Arica – Parinacota Eileen Kapples SIT Study Abroad Programa: Salud Publica, Medicina Tradicional y Empoderamiento de la Comunidad Diciembre, 2011 Consejero: Dr. Alfrodin Turra Directora Académica: Rossana Testa, Ph.D Abstract The World Health Organization (WHO) affirms that clean drinking water is an essential resource and deems it a basic human right. The principle objective of this investigation is to study the quality and accessibility of drinking water in rural Chile, in the northern most region, XV Arica – Parinacota. Specific objectives include the investigation of the functioning and management of water services, determining the percentages of populations who do not have access to water services, and conducting analyses of the physical-chemical and bacteriological content of the water.
    [Show full text]
  • World Bank Document
    69701 Chile: Regional Development Planning Public Disclosure Authorized Evolving Policy and its Application to Regions I and XV Main Document December 21, 2007 Poverty Reduction and Economic Management Unit Latin America and the Caribbean Public Disclosure Authorized Document of The World Bank Public Disclosure Authorized Public Disclosure Authorized i CURRENCY EQUIVALENTS Currency Unit = Chilean Pesos (CLP) US$1.0 = CLP $496.75 (December, 2007) GOVERNMENT FISCAL YEAR January 1 to December 31 WEIGHTS MEASURES Metric System Vice President: Pamela Cox Country Director: Pedro Alba Sector Director: Marcelo Giugale Sector Leader: James Parks Sector Manager: Nick Manning 1. Task Manager : Fernando Rojas ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS In order to address this research agenda, the Bank assembled a team of Chilean and international experts. The team, lead by Fernando Rojas, was composed of Mr. Geoffrey Shepherd, who was the main editor of this report. It was also composed of Thomas Courchene, Enrique Fanta, Roberto Panzardi, Emily Sinnott, Wolfgang Koehling, Fanny Weiner, Raul Labán, Helena Dúran, Paulina Soto, Azul del Villar and Chie Ingvoldstad and Patricia Mendez. Yoko Katakura, William Dillinger, Maria Emilia Freire, Remy Prud’Homme, Paul Bernd Spahn, Harald L. Fuhr and Ignacio Irarrázaval provided useful comments to earlier drafts as peer reviewers. The team as a whole spent two separate weeks in Chile for data collection, meeting with officials and experts, and internal discussion and deliberation. As part of the initial meeting, the team visited Region I and Region XV, where the team met with officials, experts, politicians and various civil society associations. Earlier drafts of this report were presented to and discussed with the Minister of Finance and his team, and the Sub Direccion de Desarrollo Regional.
    [Show full text]
  • ACCIÓN VOLCÁNICA Y CLIMÁTICA EN SU MODELADO Diálogo Andino - Revista De Historia, Geografía Y Cultura Andina, Núm
    Diálogo Andino - Revista de Historia, Geografía y Cultura Andina ISSN: 0716-2278 [email protected] Universidad de Tarapacá Chile Rodríguez Valdivia, Alan; Albornoz Espinoza, Cristián; Tapia Tosetti, Alejandro GEOMORFOLOGÍA DEL ÁREA DE PUTRE, ANDES DEL NORTE DE CHILE: ACCIÓN VOLCÁNICA Y CLIMÁTICA EN SU MODELADO Diálogo Andino - Revista de Historia, Geografía y Cultura Andina, núm. 54, 2017, pp. 7-20 Universidad de Tarapacá Arica, Chile Disponible en: http://www.redalyc.org/articulo.oa?id=371353686002 Cómo citar el artículo Número completo Sistema de Información Científica Más información del artículo Red de Revistas Científicas de América Latina, el Caribe, España y Portugal Página de la revista en redalyc.org Proyecto académico sin fines de lucro, desarrollado bajo la iniciativa de acceso abierto Nº 54, 2017. Páginas 7-20 Diálogo Andino GEOMORFOLOGÍA DEL ÁREA DE PUTRE, ANDES DEL NORTE DE CHILE: ACCIÓN VOLCÁNICA Y CLIMÁTICA EN SU MODELADO* GEOMORPHOLOGY OF THE PUTRE AREA, NORTHERN ANDES OF CHILE: VOLCANIC AND CLIMATE ACTION IN ITS MODELING Alan Rodríguez Valdivia**, Cristián Albornoz Espinoza*** y Alejandro Tapia Tosetti**** El área de Putre se localiza en una subcuenca de montaña a 3.500 msnm, en la vertiente oeste de la cordillera occidental Andina (extremo norte de Chile), en el que predominan formas de relieve asociadas a la acción volcánica y del clima. Dicho relieve es producto de la evolución geológica del Complejo Volcánico Taapaca (CVT), cuyos procesos eruptivos han dado paso a morfolito- logías constructivas que configuran la subcuenca estudiada, en las que el factor climático ha actuado constantemente, meteorizando y erosionando los materiales, dando como resultado formas derivadas de procesos gravitacionales, fluviales y, en menor medida, periglaciales.
    [Show full text]
  • Environmental Citizen Participation As a Tool to Local Governance in Andean Territory of the Arica and Parinacota Region, Chile
    Environmental Citizen Participation as a Tool to Local Governance in Andean Territory Of The Arica And Parinacota Region, Chile. The Case of “The Pumas Manganese Mining Proyect”. 1. An Introduction to the Environmental Impact Assessment System (SEIA) in Chile In the last few years the Environmental Institution has been changing in Chile. During 2010, Act 20417 is published, modifying the Law on General Bases of the environment Nª 19.300, creating the Ministry of the Environment, the Environment Superintendence and the Environmental Assessment Service (SEA in Spanish). The Environmental Impact Assessment System (SEIA in Spanish) is the main tool established in the Environmental Legislation to predict and prevent impact of activities and projects that could have an important impact on the environment. This tool allows introduction of the environmental dimension in the design and implementation of projects and activities carried out in the country; through it, we can assess and certify that the initiatives, of both public and private sectors, are able to comply with the pertinent environmental requirements. Depending on the magnitude of the Impacts derived from the activities there are two modalities: the Environmental Impact Study (EIA, in case any of the purposes, characteristics or circumstances described in Article 11 of the Law on General Bases of the Environment comes up) or as an Environmental Assessment Statement. The experience of the participation process in the “Los Pumas Manganese” project will permit knowing how the first stages of project assessment in the region have developed, allowing identification of the community’s attitude towards the idea of the installation of the project and how social coalitions faced with the conflict have been formed, permitting in this way anticipating advances and limitations in favour of reaching processes of environmental governance in the region.
    [Show full text]
  • Geología Del Área De Estudio De La XV Región De Arica Y Parinacota
    Geología del Área de Estudio de la XV Región de Arica Y Parinacota 420000 440000 460000 480000 500000 µ PERU Calvariune ! Pinuta ! VisviriVisviri PAMPA PINUTA ! Pucarani ! Co. Vichocollo PAMPA PUTANI 8050000 General Lagos 8050000 ! Queullare Co. Chupiquina Challaserco ! Punta B Pedregoso Cullani Azufreras Chupiquina Challapujo ! ! Corcota Azufreras Tacora ! Chislloma ! Co. Guallancallani Azufreras Vilque ! Airo San Luis Contornasa ! ! ! BOLIVIA Chapoco Guallancallari PAMPA CONTORNASA ! Putani ! PAMPA CRUZ VILQUE Aguas Calientes Co. Vilasaya Putani Co. Patanca Guanaquilca ! ! Negro A ! Anantocollo ! Co. De Caracarani Atilla ! Umaguilca Putuputane! ! Guacollo ! Co. Charsaya Cosapilla Co. Solterocollo Co. Guanapotosi ! Linanpalca PAMPA PALCOPAMPA Villa Industrial ! Agua Rica ! NEVADO DE CHIQUINANTA Limani ! Loma Liczone Huancarcollo Camana Tiluyo Co. Chinchillane ! ! Loma Liczones Sarayuma ! ! Loma Liczones PAMPA ANCOMA GENERAL LAGOS Co. Iquilla Tuma Palca Co. Cosapilla ! Ancocalani ! Pamputa Hospicio ! ! Pahuta Co. Churicahua Aricopujo ! ! Co. Copotanca Co. Pumata Co. Titire Chollota ! Nasahuento PAMPA AGUA MILAGRO ! PAMPA GUANAVINTO Co.Pararene PAMPA JAMACHAVINTO Co.Plapuline Co. Colpitas PAMPA TACATA CERRO HUENUME Colpitas Guailla ! Uncaliri Chico PAMPA MARANSILANE Co. Paracoya !! Uncaliri GrandeRosapare! Co. Condoriri SIERRA DE HUAYLILLAS Queumahuna ! Autilla ! ! PAMPA DE ALLANE PAMPA CASCACHANE PAMPA GUANOCO Co. Curaguara Cochantare Quenuavinto ! Pacharaque ! Jaillabe ! Co. Muntirune ! Caquena Colpita! ! !Culiculini Co. Huilacuragura
    [Show full text]
  • Informe De Avance Iabin Ecosystem Grant
    INFORME DE AVANCE IABIN ECOSYSTEM GRANT: DIGITALIZACIÓN DE DATOS E INFORMACIÓN, DEPURACIÓN Y ESTANDARIZACIÓN DE PISOS DE VEGETACIÓN DE CHILE Patricio Pliscoff, Federico Luebert, Corporación Taller La Era, Santiago, Chile, 30 de Septiembre de 2008. Resumen Se ha ingresado el 50,6% de la información bibliográfica recopilada para el desarrollo de la base de información puntual georeferenciada de inventarios de vegetación. Se ha depurado el 68,5% del total de pisos de vegetación de la cartografía digital. Se ha comenzado el proceso de estandarización de la clasificación de pisos de vegetación con el estándar de metadatos del IABIN, encontrando algunas dificultades en el ingreso de información. Las equivalencias entre pisos de vegetación y sistemas ecológicos ya ha sido finalizada. Abstract The 50.6% of the compiled bibliographic references for the development of the georeferenced database of vegetation inventories have been included. The 68.5% of vegetation belts of the digital cartography have been debbuged and fixed. The standarization process of vegetation belts has been begun, entering data into the IABIN ecosystem standard, finding some difficulties in the information entrance. The equivalences between vegetation belts and ecological systems has already been finished. Objetivos del Proyecto 1) Generación de una base de información puntual georeferenciada de inventarios de vegetación. 2) Depuración de cartografía digital de pisos vegetacionales. 3) Estandarizar la clasificación de Pisos de vegetación con los estándares de metadatos de IABIN y con la clasificación de Sistemas Ecológicos de NatureServe. Productos y resultados esperados De acuerdo con los objetivos mencionados, se espera obtener los siguientes resultados: - Una base de datos georeferenciada de puntos con inventarios de vegetación chilena - Una cartografía depurada de pisos de vegetación de Chile (Luebert & Pliscoff 2006) - Un esquema de equivalencias entre la clasificación de pisos de vegetación de Chile (Luebert & Pliscoff 2006) y la clasificación de sistemas ecológicos de NatureServe (2003).
    [Show full text]
  • Geomorfología Del Área De Putre, Andes Del Norte De Chile
    Nº 54, 2017. Páginas 7-20 Diálogo Andino GEOMORFOLOGÍA DEL ÁREA DE PUTRE, ANDES DEL NORTE DE CHILE: ACCIÓN VOLCÁNICA Y CLIMÁTICA EN SU MODELADO* GEOMORPHOLOGY OF THE PUTRE AREA, NORTHERN ANDES OF CHILE: VOLCANIC AND CLIMATE ACTION IN ITS MODELING Alan Rodríguez Valdivia**, Cristián Albornoz Espinoza*** y Alejandro Tapia Tosetti**** El área de Putre se localiza en una subcuenca de montaña a 3.500 msnm, en la vertiente oeste de la cordillera occidental Andina (extremo norte de Chile), en el que predominan formas de relieve asociadas a la acción volcánica y del clima. Dicho relieve es producto de la evolución geológica del Complejo Volcánico Taapaca (CVT), cuyos procesos eruptivos han dado paso a morfolito- logías constructivas que configuran la subcuenca estudiada, en las que el factor climático ha actuado constantemente, meteorizando y erosionando los materiales, dando como resultado formas derivadas de procesos gravitacionales, fluviales y, en menor medida, periglaciales. Se reconoce en el modelado existente, la acción ejercida por procesos de tipo gravitacional que se han traducido en movimientos en masa de tipo derrumbes y flujos de detritos, mientras que la acción fluvial ha favorecido la formación de profundas y angostas quebradas en el área. Palabras claves: Putre, Complejo Volcánico Taapaca, Geomorfología, Movimientos en masa. The Putre area is located in a sub-basin at an altitude of 3,500 m on the west slope of the Western Andean mountain range (in the northernmost part of Chile), with volcanoes and the climate forming the predominant landforms. This relief is the result of the geological evolution of the Taapaca Volcanic Complex (CVT) whose eruptions have given rise to constructive morpho-lithologies shaping the sub-basin, and the climate consistently weathering and eroding, leading to forms which resulte primary from gravi- tational and fluvial processes and secundary from periglacial mechanisms.
    [Show full text]
  • Chile Trip Report April 2015
    BIRDING CHILE APRIL 11 – 29, 2015 A BIRDING AND LOGISTICS REPORT We visited Chile at a rather unconventional time, as most birding groups visit the country in the austral spring/summer. This report was mostly written at the time of the trip, but due to an additional 4 months of traveling through the tropics it never was finished. Although this report doesn’t include the depth and breadth of information I originally planned it to have, I decided to publish it anyway. There is very little information available for birding trips to Chile in April, so hopefully this will be helpful to others that decide to travel to the country during the austral fall. For blog posts on the trip (and a lot more pictures) visit the Chile section of Budgetbirders.com TRIP ITINERARY April 11 – Arrived Santiago 0300, SUMMARY departed for Punta Arenas 0800 WHEN and arrived 1630 Most birding groups visit Chile during the austral spring or April 12 – Laguna Los Palos, summer (Nov-Mar) when resident birds are breeding and Route 9, Puerto Natales, Torres migrants are present. Due to schedule constraints we visited Del Paine Chile in the austral fall. Despite not being the prime time of April 13 – Torres Del Paine (Lago year, overall we had a very successful trip. Most of the typical Gray Trail), Sierra Bagueles Chilean target species were still present but we missed April 14 – Route 405, Port several austral migrants, most notably 3 species from Delgada Ferry, Porvenir tyrannidae, White-sided Hillstar, Austral Rail, and Creamy- rumped Miner. April 15 – Laguana Verde, Parque Penguinos Rey TOTAL # OF SPECIES: April 16 – Porvenir, seawatch, Birding highlights included seeing a total of 241 species of ferry to Puenta Arenas which 10 were Chilean endemics.
    [Show full text]
  • The Andean Mountain Cat (Oreailurus Jacobita) in the Central Andes: an Attempt of Status Assessment by Field Interviews
    The Andean mountain cat (Oreailurus jacobita) in the central Andes: an attempt of status assessment by field interviews. Guillaume Chapron Laboratoire d'Ecologie CNRS, Ecole Normale Supérieure, 46 rue d'Ulm, 75230 Paris Cedex 05, France Very few is known about the Andean mountain cat in the Andes. I was able to conduct a preliminary survey in July 1998 in several protected areas in Chile and Bolivia. Here are the results. The information gathered on its repartition provides basis for further research. Travels by 4x4 covered 3.000 km at an altitude ranging from 2.400 INTRODUCTION to 5.000 m. Average temperatures encountered were 10°C during The Andean mountain cat (Oreailurus jacobita) is one of the the day and -20°C during the night. Wheather was almost sunny least poorly known felid species in the world (Nowell & Jackson, and windy. In Chile I visited all the Region I protected areas: Lauca 1996). Only few specimens are available in museums, often with National Park, Las Vicuñas National Reserve, Salar de Surire unprecise locations. It was first described in the genus Felis Natural Monument and Volcan Isluga National Park and, in Region (Cornalia, 1865) and placed later in the newly created genus II, the future Licancabur-Tatio National Park. It was not possible to Oreailurus (Cabrera, 1940). In 1973, Kuhn found on the basis of visit the Los Flamencos National Reserve but information the study of a single skull that a distinctive character was the concerning this protected area was collected in San Pedro de respective size of tympanic bullae chambers, the anterior being Atacama.
    [Show full text]
  • 7 Reasons to Visit Chile
    7 reasons to visit Chile - Surprising natural wonders - Culture and Heritage - World-class Sports and Adventure - Flavors and Wine from the end of the world - Astronomical Tourism - Vibrant City Life - Health and Wellness By region (from North to South) these would be the places we (SAT Chile) most sell to our different markets: The North and The Atacama Desert - The Lauca National Park – Lake Chungara: UNESCO World Biosphere Reserve. - San Pedro de Atacama: The driest desert of the world, more than 375 natural attractions Santiago, Valparaíso and The Central Valleys - Casablanca: one of the 10 Greatest Wine Capitals of the world. - Valparaíso’s lifts and trolleybuses: living heritage. - Route of the Poets: Neruda’s houses on Negra Island and in Valparaíso, and Vicente Huidobro’s house in Cartagena. - Colchagua Valley: It has been dubbed “The Best Winemaking Region in the World” by the magazine Wine Enthusiast thanks to its world-classreds. Lakes and Volcanoes - Villarrica and Pucon: Thermal Springs Route: a large concentration of thermalsprings in the middle of the country’s natural landscape. - Pucón: an adventure sports paradise, offering kayak, rafting, trekking and volcano climbs Puerto Varas and Frutillar - Puyehue National Park, Vicente Pérez Rosales National Park and Alerce Andino National Park: southern forests and landscapes. - The Lakes Crossing: navigate along Todos los Santos Lake and make the crossing over to the Argentine city of Bariloche. Chiloé - 16 of Chiloé’s traditional churches are UNESCO World Heritage Sites. -
    [Show full text]