DOCSLIB.ORG

Forest Pest Management Forum 2005

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Forest Pest Management Forum 2005 cfs-scf.nrcan-rncan.gc.ca Proceedings of the / Compte rendu du http://forum.glfc.forestry.ca December 6-7-8 décembre 2005 Ottawa Congress Centre / Centre des congrès d’Ottawa 55 Colonel By Drive / 55, promenade du Colonel By Ottawa, Ontario, Canada Natural Resources Ressources naturelles Canada Canada ii LIBRARY AND ARCHIVES CANADA CATALOGUING CATALOGAGE AVANT PUBLICATION DE IN PUBLICATION BIBLIOTHÈQUE ET ARCHIVES CANADA Forest Pest Management Forum (2005 : Ottawa, Ont.) Forest Pest Management Forum (2005 : Ottawa, Ont.) Proceedings of the Forest Pest Management Forum 2005 Proceedings of the Forest Pest Management Forum 2005 [electronic resource] = Compte rendu du Forum sur la [ressource électronique] = Compte rendu du Forum sur la répression des ravageurs forestiers 2005. répression des ravageurs forestiers 2005. Electronic monograph in PDF format. Monographie électronique en version PDF. Mode of access: World Wide Web. Mode d'accès: World Wide Web. Text in English and French. Texte en anglais et en français. ISBN 0-662-49318-4 ISBN 0-662-49318-4 1. Trees--Diseases and pests--Control--Canada-- 1. Arbres--Maladies et fléaux, Lutte contre les--Canada-- Congresses. Congrès. 2. Forest insects--Control--Canada--Congresses. 2. Insectes forestiers, Lutte contre les--Canada--Congrès. 3. Insect pests--Control--Canada--Congresses. 3. Insectes nuisibles, Lutte contre les--Canada--Congrès. 4. Trees--Diseases and pests--Canada--Congresses. 4. Arbres--Maladies et fléaux--Canada--Congrès. 5. Forest management--Canada--Congresses. 5. Forêts--Gestion--Canada--Congrès. I. Great Lakes Forestry Centre. I. Centre de foresterie des Grands Lacs II. Title. II. Titre. III. Title: Compte rendu du Forum sur la répression des III. Titre: Compte rendu du Forum sur la répression des ravageurs forestiers 2005. ravageurs forestiers 2005. SB764.C3F66 2006 634.9'670971 C2006-980163-0E SB764C3F66 2006 634.9'670971 C2006-980163-0F © Her Majesty the Queen in Right of Canada 2006 © Sa Majesté la Reine du Chef du Canada 2006 Catalog Number Fo121-1/2005-PDF Numéro de catalogue Fo121-1/2005-PDF ISBN 0-662-49318-4 ISBN 0-662-49318-4 ISSN 1911-0855 ISSN 1911-0855 The texts included in these proceedings are the Les textes apparaissent dans la version fournie par les original versions provided by the authors with auteurs, avec l’autorisation de publier. Ces derniers authorization to publish and the authors remain demeurent responsables tant de la forme que du fond de responsible for both the form and content of their leurs écrits. papers. iii Committee Members /Membres du comité STEERING COMMITTEE / COMITÉ D’ORIENTATION Anthony Hopkin, Chair, Natural Resources Canada, Canadian Forest Service, Great Lakes Forestry Centre / Ressources naturelles Canada, Service canadien des forêts, Centre de foresterie des Laurentides Eric Allen, Natural Resources Canada, Canadian Forest Service, Pacific Forestry Centre / Ressources naturelles Canada, Service canadien des forêts, Centre de foresterie du Pacifique Mike Butler, Prince Edward Island, Environment, Energy and Forestry, Forests, Fish and Wildlife Branch / Île-du-Prince-Édouard, Ministère de l’Environnement, de l’Énergie et des Forêts, Direction des forêts, de la pêche et de la faune Nelson Carter, New Brunswick Department of Natural Resources / Ministère des Richesses naturelles du Nouveau-Brunswick Hubert Crummey, Newfoundland Department of Natural Resources / Ministère des Richesses de Terre-Neuve Gaëtan Daoust, Ressources naturelles Canada, Service canadien des forêts, Centre de foresterie des Laurentides / Natural Resources Canada, Canadian Forest Service, Laurentian Forestry Centre Marcel Dawson, Canadian Food Inspection Agency / Agence canadienne d’inspection des aliments Jacques Drolet, Health Canada, Pest Management Regulatory Agency / Santé Canada, Agence de réglementation de la lutte antiparasitaire Tim Ebata, British Columbia Ministry of Forests and Range / Ministère des Forêts et des Parcours de la Colombie-Britannique Walter Fanning, Nova Scotia Department of Natural Resources / Ministère des Richesses naturelles de la Nouvelle-Écosse Rich Fleming, Natural Resources Canada, Canadian Forest Service, Great Lakes Forestry Centre / Ressources naturelles Canada, Service canadien des forêts, Centre de foresterie des Grands Lacs iv J. Edward Hurley, Natural Resources Canada, Canadian Forest Service, Atlantic Forestry Centre / Ressources naturelles Canada, Service canadien des forêts, Centre de foresterie de l’Atlantique Michael Irvine, Ontario Ministry of Natural Resources / Ministère des richesses naturelles de l’Ontario Christopher Lucarotti, Natural Resources Canada, Canadian Forest Service, Atlantic Forestry Centre / Ressources naturelles Canada, Service canadien des forêts, Centre de foresterie de l’Atlantique Ken Mallett, Natural Resources Canada, Canadian Forest Service, Northern Forestry Centre / Ressources naturelles Canada, Service canadien des forêts, Centre de foresterie du Nord Rory McIntosh, Saskatchewan Environment, Forest Services Branch / Ministère de l’Environnement de la Saskatchewan, Direction des services forestiers Ben Moody, Natural Resources Canada, Canadian Forest Service, National Headquarters / Ressources naturelles Canada / Service canadien des forêts (Ottawa) Louis Morneau, Ministère des Ressources naturelles et de la Faune / Quebec Ministry of Natural Resources and Wildlife Hideji Ono, Alberta Environment, Lands and Forest Division / Ministère de l’Environnement de l’Alberta, Division des terres et forêts Stan Phippen, Natural Resources Canada, Canadian Forest Service, Great Lakes Forestry Centre / Ressources naturelles Canada, Service canadien des forêts, Centre de foresterie des Grands Lacs Irene Pines, Manitoba Conservation, Forestry Branch / Conservation Manitoba, Direction des forêts v 2005 PEST FORUM PLANNING TEAM ÉQUIPE DE PLANIFICATION DU FORUM 2005 Stan Phippen, Natural Resources Canada, Canadian Forest Service, Great Lakes Planning Team Leader Forestry Centre / Ressources naturelles Canada, Service canadien des forêts, Centre de foresterie des Grands Lacs Sandra Abi-Aad, Natural Resources Canada, Canadian Forest Service, National Headquarters / Ressources naturelles Canada, Service canadien des forêts (Ottawa) Cindy Crawford, Natural Resources Canada, Canadian Forest Service, Great Lakes Forestry Centre / Ressources naturelles Canada, Service canadien des forêts, Centre de foresterie des Grands Lacs Gaëtan Daoust, Ressources naturelles Canada, Service canadien des forêts, Centre de foresterie des Laurentides Natural Resources Canada, Canadian Forest Service, Laurentian Forestry Centre Anthony Hopkin, Natural Resources Canada, Canadian Forest Service, Great Lakes Forestry Centre / Ressources naturelles Canada, Service canadien des forêts, Centre de foresterie des Grands Lacs Mary Humphries, Eastern Ontario Model Forest / Forêt modèle de l’Est de l’Ontario Karen Jamieson, Natural Resources Canada, Canadian Forest Service, Great Lakes Forestry Centre / Ressources naturelles Canada, Service canadien des forêts, Centre de foresterie des Grands Lacs Lucie Labreque, Ressources naturelles Canada, Service canadien des forêts, Centre de foresterie des Laurentides / Natural Resources Canada, Canadian Forest Service, Laurentian Forestry Centre Julie Lemoine, Ressources naturelles Canada, Service canadien des forêts, Centre de foresterie des Laurentides / Natural Resources Canada, Canadian Forest Service, Laurentian Forestry Centre Christopher Lucarotti, Natural Resources Canada, Canadian Forest Service, Atlantic Forestry Centre / Ressources naturelles Canada, Service canadien des forêts, Centre de foresterie de l’Atlantique vi Mark Primavera, Natural Resources Canada, Canadian Forest Service, Great Lakes Forestry Centre / Ressources naturelles Canada, Service canadien des forêts, Centre de foresterie des Grands Lacs Guy Smith, Natural Resources Canada, Canadian Forest Service, Great Lakes Forestry Centre / Ressources naturelles Canada, Service canadien des forêts, Centre de foresterie des Grands Lacs vii 2005 Forest Pest Management Forum Proceedings Compte rendu du Forum 2005 sur la répression des ravageurs forestiers Ottawa Congress Centre / Centre des congrès d’Ottawa Ottawa, ON December 6-7-8, 2005 / 6-7-8 décembre 2005 The Forest Pest Management Forum is sponsored annually by Natural Resources Canada, Canadian Forest Service, to provide a platform for representatives of various provincial governments and the federal government to present, review and discuss current forest pest conditions in Canada and the United States. Le Forum sur la répression des ravageurs forestiers est parrainé annuellement par le Service canadien des forêts de Ressources naturelles Canada. Il permet à des représentants de divers gouvernements provinciaux et du gouvernement fédéral de présenter et d’examiner la situation des principaux ravageurs forestiers au Canada et aux États-Unis. HOPKIN, Anthony, Chair, Steering Committee Natural Resources Canada, Canadian Forest Service, Great Lakes Forestry Centre 1219 Queen St. E., Sault Ste. Marie, ON P6A 2E5 [email protected] (705) 541-5612 FOR OFFICIAL USE ONLY. The text included in these proceedings are the original versions provided by the authors with authorization to publish and the authors remain responsible for both the form and content of their papers/abstracts. Material contained in this report is reproduced as submitted and has not been subject to peer review or editing by the staff of the Canadian Forest Service. POUR USAGE OFFICIEL SEULEMENT. Les textes
Load more

Recommended publications
  • 2,4-Dichlorophenoxyacetic Acid
    2,4-Dichlorophenoxyacetic acid 2,4-Dichlorophenoxyacetic acid IUPAC (2,4-dichlorophenoxy)acetic acid name 2,4-D Other hedonal names trinoxol Identifiers CAS [94-75-7] number SMILES OC(COC1=CC=C(Cl)C=C1Cl)=O ChemSpider 1441 ID Properties Molecular C H Cl O formula 8 6 2 3 Molar mass 221.04 g mol−1 Appearance white to yellow powder Melting point 140.5 °C (413.5 K) Boiling 160 °C (0.4 mm Hg) point Solubility in 900 mg/L (25 °C) water Related compounds Related 2,4,5-T, Dichlorprop compounds Except where noted otherwise, data are given for materials in their standard state (at 25 °C, 100 kPa) 2,4-Dichlorophenoxyacetic acid (2,4-D) is a common systemic herbicide used in the control of broadleaf weeds. It is the most widely used herbicide in the world, and the third most commonly used in North America.[1] 2,4-D is also an important synthetic auxin, often used in laboratories for plant research and as a supplement in plant cell culture media such as MS medium. History 2,4-D was developed during World War II by a British team at Rothamsted Experimental Station, under the leadership of Judah Hirsch Quastel, aiming to increase crop yields for a nation at war.[citation needed] When it was commercially released in 1946, it became the first successful selective herbicide and allowed for greatly enhanced weed control in wheat, maize (corn), rice, and similar cereal grass crop, because it only kills dicots, leaving behind monocots. Mechanism of herbicide action 2,4-D is a synthetic auxin, which is a class of plant growth regulators.
    [Show full text]
  • TB970 Forest Herbicide Effects on Pacific Northwest Ecosystems
    ncasi NATIONAL COUNCIL FOR AIR AND STREAM IMPROVEMENT FOREST HERBICIDE EFFECTS ON PACIFIC NORTHWEST ECOSYSTEMS: A LITERATURE REVIEW TECHNICAL BULLETIN NO. 970 DECEMBER 2009 by Laurie A. Clark NCASI Western Wildlife Program Tenmile, Oregon Gary J. Roloff, Ph.D. Michigan State University East Lansing, Michigan Vickie L. Tatum, Ph.D. NCASI Southern Regional Center Newberry, Florida Larry L. Irwin, Ph.D. NCASI Western Wildlife Program Stevensville, Montana Acknowledgments We wish to extend special thanks to Dr. Mike Newton for critically reviewing an early draft of this document and providing valuable advice on content, context, and formatting. We also extend our appreciation to Dr. Thomas Sullivan, Dr. A.J. Kroll, Tony Melchiors, Dr. Darren Miller, Dr. John Cook, Dr. George Ice, Dr. Alan Lucier, Stu Farber, Jeff Light, Matt Higgins, Steve Wickham, Jerry Breland, Conner Fristoe, and Marshall Jacobson for providing critical manuscript reviews. All of your comments and edits greatly improved this manuscript, and for this we are grateful. We express our gratitude to Judith Adamski for assistance with literature acquisition. Funding for this project was provided by NCASI, and member companies of the Washington Forest Protection Association, Oregon Forest Industries Council, and the American Forest Resource Council. For more information about this research, contact: Larry L. Irwin, Ph.D. Alan A. Lucier, Ph.D. Principal Research Scientist Senior Vice President NCASI Western Wildlife NCASI P.O. Box 68 P.O. Box 13318 Stevensville, MT 59870 Research Triangle Park, NC 27709-3318 (406) 777-7215 (919) 941-6403 [email protected] [email protected] For information about NCASI publications, contact: Publications Coordinator NCASI P.O.
    [Show full text]
  • Cleantraxx™ Herbicide
    Solutions for the Growing World TECHNICAL BULLETIN FOR CONIFER FOREST AND TREE PLANTATIONS USE Cleantraxx™ herbicide controls broadleaf, annual grass weeds and some woody brush seedlings when applied as a pre-emergence or early post-emergence application for conifer site preparation, conifer release and forest roadsides. It is labeled for use in CA, OR, and WA forestry as a Special Local Needs (SLN) label. It has excellent conifer tolerance especially on those species that are not tolerant to hexazinone. Cleantraxx is also labeled for non-cropland uses such as roadsides, railroads, and utility rights-of-way. Cleantraxx™ herbicide is an SC formulation containing: • Penoxsulam: 0.083 lb/gallon, an ALS herbicide with broad spectrum weed control • Oxyfluorfen: 3.96 lb/gallon, a PPO inhibitor herbicide, a long GENERAL GUIDELINES: time standard for broad spectrum weed control • Best results are obtained using Cleantraxx™ ™ Benefits of Cleantraxx herbicide at 3 pints/acre in the early spring for conifer site • Broad Spectrum Weed Control: over 50 broadleaf preparation or conifer release with a rain event and grass species, including glyphosate resistant species like within 21 days after application marestail and fleabane (see main label for complete list of weeds controlled) • Excellent conifer tolerance has been shown for • Burndown and Residual Control: up to 6 months after the Ponderosa pine, Douglas-fir, western larch, white fir, application at the 3 pint/acre rate sugar pine, redwoods, and incense cedar. New trials • Conifer Safety: excellent
    [Show full text]
  • Herbicides for Weed Control in Turfgrass James Mcafee, Ph.D., Extension Turfgrass Specialist, Dallas, Texas and Paul A
    EXHIBIT THREE EVALUATION OF NOVEMBER 2013 DETECTION OF NEW PARAMETERS CLOSED COLLINSVILLE LANDFILL COLLINSVILLE, ILLINOIS Closed Collinsville Landfill Petition for Adjusted Standards EXHIBIT 3-1 Groundwater Assessment of 31 Additional Parameters under 35 IAC 620.410 and 4th Quarter 2013 Monitoring Results Submitted to IEPA in February 2014 NOTE: This copy excludes the electronic data submitted to the IEPA as Appendix B, Appendix C Field Notes, Appendix D Chain of Custodies and Analytical Results of the above report, and the Analytical Results for Appendix E Historical Leachate Sampling Results that is provided in the data summary tables of this report and the historical letter reports for the leachate sampling. Closed Collinsville Landfill Petition for Adjusted Standards GROUNDWATER ASSESSMENT OF 31 ADDITIONAL PARAMETERS UNDER 35 IAC 620.410 AND 4TH QUARTER 2013 MONITORING RESULTS CLOSED COLLINSVILLE LANDFILL COLLINSVILLE, ILLINOIS FEBRUARY 2014 Prepared for: CITY OF COLLINSVILLE COLLINSVILLE, ILLINOIS 62234 PROJECT NUMBER: 31891 PREPARED BY: TETRA TECH, INC. 1634 Eastport Plaza Collinsville, Illinois 62234 Closed Collinsville Landfill Petition for Adjusted Standards Groundwater Assessment of 31 Additional Parameters under 35 IAC 620.410 Closed Collinsville Landfill, Collinsville, Illinois City of Collinsville February 2014 TABLE OF CONTENTS EXECUTIVE SUMMARY .....................................................................................IV 1.0 INTRODUCTION........................................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • CHECKLIST of WISCONSIN MOTHS (Superfamilies Mimallonoidea, Drepanoidea, Lasiocampoidea, Bombycoidea, Geometroidea, and Noctuoidea)
    WISCONSIN ENTOMOLOGICAL SOCIETY SPECIAL PUBLICATION No. 6 JUNE 2018 CHECKLIST OF WISCONSIN MOTHS (Superfamilies Mimallonoidea, Drepanoidea, Lasiocampoidea, Bombycoidea, Geometroidea, and Noctuoidea) Leslie A. Ferge,1 George J. Balogh2 and Kyle E. Johnson3 ABSTRACT A total of 1284 species representing the thirteen families comprising the present checklist have been documented in Wisconsin, including 293 species of Geometridae, 252 species of Erebidae and 584 species of Noctuidae. Distributions are summarized using the six major natural divisions of Wisconsin; adult flight periods and statuses within the state are also reported. Examples of Wisconsin’s diverse native habitat types in each of the natural divisions have been systematically inventoried, and species associated with specialized habitats such as peatland, prairie, barrens and dunes are listed. INTRODUCTION This list is an updated version of the Wisconsin moth checklist by Ferge & Balogh (2000). A considerable amount of new information from has been accumulated in the 18 years since that initial publication. Over sixty species have been added, bringing the total to 1284 in the thirteen families comprising this checklist. These families are estimated to comprise approximately one-half of the state’s total moth fauna. Historical records of Wisconsin moths are relatively meager. Checklists including Wisconsin moths were compiled by Hoy (1883), Rauterberg (1900), Fernekes (1906) and Muttkowski (1907). Hoy's list was restricted to Racine County, the others to Milwaukee County. Records from these publications are of historical interest, but unfortunately few verifiable voucher specimens exist. Unverifiable identifications and minimal label data associated with older museum specimens limit the usefulness of this information. Covell (1970) compiled records of 222 Geometridae species, based on his examination of specimens representing at least 30 counties.
    [Show full text]
  • Paysages À Fréquenter Jean-François Rolland and Jean-François Bélanger
    Document generated on 09/30/2021 8:27 p.m. Continuité Paysages à fréquenter Jean-François Rolland and Jean-François Bélanger L’architecture de paysage au Québec Number 1, Special, Fall 1990 URI: https://id.erudit.org/iderudit/16003ac See table of contents Publisher(s) Éditions Continuité ISSN 0714-9476 (print) 1923-2543 (digital) Explore this journal Cite this article Rolland, J.-F. & Bélanger, J.-F. (1990). Paysages à fréquenter. Continuité, (1), 81–85. Tous droits réservés © Éditions Continuité, 1990 This document is protected by copyright law. Use of the services of Érudit (including reproduction) is subject to its terms and conditions, which can be viewed online. https://apropos.erudit.org/en/users/policy-on-use/ This article is disseminated and preserved by Érudit. Érudit is a non-profit inter-university consortium of the Université de Montréal, Université Laval, and the Université du Québec à Montréal. Its mission is to promote and disseminate research. https://www.erudit.org/en/ PAYSAGES À FRÉQUENTER par Jean-François Rolland et Jean-François Bélanger REGION DE QUEBEC 1. Parc des Champs-de-Bataille. 2. Jardins du Musée du Québec, 6. Place d'Armes, rue Saint- Québec et Montréal, Concepteur: Frederick G. Todd, avenue Wolfe-Montcalm. Louis. à travers leurs parcs, 1909. Concepteur: Chantai Restauration: Georges Houplain, Planifié en 1909 par Frederick Prud'Homme, Pluram inc., Service d'urbanisme, Ville de places et jardins. Todd, premier architecte 1990. Québec, 1973. paysagiste canadien, ce parc de Aménagés pour l'inauguration La place d'Armes a maintes fois plus de cent hectares se partage de l'agrandissement du Musée du changé de visage.
    [Show full text]
  • Carte Des Zones Contrôlées Controlled Area
    280 RY LAKE 391 MYSTE Nelson House Pukatawagan THOMPSON 6 375 Sherridon Oxford House Northern Manitoba ds River 394 Nord du GMo anitoba 393 Snow Lake Wabowden 392 6 0 25 50 75 100 395 398 FLIN FLON Kilometres/kilomètres Lynn Lake 291 397 Herb Lake 391 Gods Lake 373 South Indian Lake 396 392 10 Bakers Narrows Fox Mine Herb Lake Landing 493 Sherritt Junction 39 Cross Lake 290 39 6 Cranberry Portage Leaf Rapids 280 Gillam 596 374 39 Jenpeg 10 Wekusko Split Lake Simonhouse 280 391 Red Sucker Lake Cormorant Nelson House THOMPSON Wanless 287 6 6 373 Root Lake ST ST 10 WOODLANDS CKWOOD RO ANDREWS CLEMENTS Rossville 322 287 Waasagomach Ladywood 4 Norway House 9 Winnipeg and Area 508 n Hill Argyle 323 8 Garde 323 320 Island Lake WinnBRiOpKEeNHEgAD et ses environs St. Theresa Point 435 SELKIRK 0 5 10 15 20 East Selkirk 283 289 THE PAS 67 212 l Stonewall Kilometres/Kilomètres Cromwel Warren 9A 384 283 509 KELSEY 10 67 204 322 Moose Lake 230 Warren Landing 7 Freshford Tyndall 236 282 6 44 Stony Mountain 410 Lockport Garson ur 220 Beausejo 321 Westray Grosse Isle 321 9 WEST ST ROSSER PAUL 321 27 238 206 6 202 212 8 59 Hazelglen Cedar 204 EAST ST Cooks Creek PAUL 221 409 220 Lac SPRINGFIELD Rosser Birds Hill 213 Hazelridge 221 Winnipeg ST FRANÇOIS 101 XAVIER Oakbank Lake 334 101 60 10 190 Grand Rapids Big Black River 27 HEADINGLEY 207 St. François Xavier Overflowing River CARTIER 425 Dugald Eas 15 Vivian terville Anola 1 Dacotah WINNIPEG Headingley 206 327 241 12 Lake 6 Winnipegosis 427 Red Deer L ake 60 100 Denbeigh Point 334 Ostenfeld 424 Westgate 1 Barrows Powell Na Springstein 100 tional Mills E 3 TACH ONALD Baden MACD 77 MOUNTAIN 483 300 Oak Bluff Pelican Ra Lake pids Grande 2 Pointe 10 207 eviève Mafeking 6 Ste-Gen Lac Winnipeg 334 Lorette 200 59 Dufresne Winnipegosis 405 Bellsite Ile des Chênes 207 3 RITCHOT 330 STE ANNE 247 75 1 La Salle 206 12 Novra St.
    [Show full text]
  • Quelques Papillons De Nuit De La Réserve Faunique De Matane
    Quelques papillons de nuit de la réserve faunique de Matane Le mont Blanc à l’arrière-plan Comité de protection des monts Chic-Chocs Rapport produit par Jacques Larivée Rimouski, mai 2017 Papillons de nuit de la réserve faunique de Matane C’est à l’invitation du Comité de protection des monts Chic-Chocs que je joins du 15 au 17 août 2016 un groupe de naturalistes qui a pour objectif d’améliorer les connaissances de la flore et de la faune du territoire de la réserve faunique de Matane. Voici les membres de l’équipe dans l’ordre où ils apparaissent sur la photo. Photo Claude Gauthier Claude Gauthier (ornithologie, photographie, kayak, transport et sécurité) ; Christian Grenier (botanique des plantes vasculaires et photographie) ; Pierre Fradette (organisation, ornithologie, photographie, transport et sécurité), Louis Fradette (organisation, ornithologie, photographie, kayak, transport et sécurité) ; Pierre Lévesque (bryologie et photographie) ; Jean Faubert (bryologie et photographie) ; Jacques Larivée (ornithologie, photographie et entomologie) ; Gaétan Caron (organisation, transport, connaissance du territoire et sécurité). 2 Papillons de nuit de la réserve faunique de Matane Mon « travail » consiste à noter mes observations des oiseaux le jour partout sur le territoire, comme le font les autres ornithologues, et à photographier les papillons de nuit le soir à l’Étang à la Truite le 15 et le 17 août et au sommet du mont Blanc le soir du 16 août. Mes observations d’oiseaux sont enregistrées sur eBird et sont résumées dans ce document. Le texte qui suit présente 3 listes d’espèces incluant au moins une photo par espèce : la liste des papillons de nuit photographiés à l’Étang à la Truite suivie de la liste des papillons de nuit photographiés au mont Blanc et de la liste des papillons de nuit non identifiés.
    [Show full text]
  • Records Du Club En Date Du 18 Juin 2018
    Hippocampe de St-Hubert 18 juin 2018 Records 12 ans et moins Messieurs Grand bassin (50m) 50 Libre 27.27 Feddag Hocine 04 2017-05-20 Centre sportif Parc Olympique (CAN) 100 Libre 58.60 Bois Mathieu 88 2001-05-04 Longueuil 200 Libre 2:11.48 Bois Mathieu 88 2001-05-04 Longueuil 400 Libre 5:01.05 Desmarais Benoît 99 1989-06-05 CNHR 800 Libre 12:31.52 Ngo Mathis 06 2017-12-10 Montréal (CAN) 1500 Libre 20:36.04 Feddag Hocine 04 2016-07-03 Pointe-Claire (CAN) 50 Dos 34.61 Ionescoux-Tremblay Mathieu 00 2013-05-05 Sherbrooke (CAN) 100 Dos 1:10.02 Ionescoux-Tremblay Mathieu 00 2013-05-05 Sherbrooke (CAN) 200 Dos 2:33.31 Feddag Hocine 04 2017-05-21 Centre sportif Parc Olympique (CAN) 50 Brasse 33.70 Bois Mathieu 88 2001-06-02 St-Jean 100 Brasse 1:12.73 Bois Mathieu 88 2001-06-29 Montréal 200 Brasse 2:38.38 Bois Mathieu 88 2001-06-29 Montréal 50 Papillon 30.87 Martinez Daniel 01 2014-07-03 Pointe-Claire (CAN) 100 Papillon 1:04.93 Bois Mathieu 88 2001-06-02 St-Jean 200 Papillon 2:36.22 Martinez Daniel 01 2014-07-04 Pointe-Claire (CAN) 200 4 nages 2:22.44 Bois Mathieu 88 2001-05-04 Longueuil 400 4 nages 5:12.07 Bois Mathieu 88 2001-06-02 St-Jean 4 x 50 Libre 2:08.92 Messieurs 2004-04-24 LASALLE (CAN) Guertin Philippe, Gauvin Olivier, Charest Francis, Sigouin-Plante Hugo 2:08.92 Messieurs 2004-04-24 LASALLE (CAN) Guertin Philippe, Gauvin Olivier, Charest Francis, Sigouin-Plante Hugo 4 x 50 4 nages 2:25.68 Messieurs 2004-04-25 LASALLE (CAN) Gauvin Olivier, Charest Francis, Guertin Philippe, Sigouin-Plante Hugo 2:25.68 Messieurs 2004-04-25 LASALLE (CAN)
    [Show full text]
  • Presse Media Guide
    GUIDE de presse Media guide FAITS SAILLANTS / HIGHLIGHTS – SAISON 2019 SEASON – Champions québécois de 2003 à 2006, en 2008, 2011, 2017 à 2019 – Deuxième meilleure fiche du RSEQ (9 victoires – 1 revers – 2 nulles) – Équipe classée dans le top-10 U SPORTS toute la saison (Actuel : 4e rang) – Troisième présence au Championnat canadien consécutive – RSEQ Champions from 2003 to 2006, in 2008, 2011, 2017 to 2019 – Ranked 2nd in the RSEQ standings with a 9-1-2 record – Ranked in the U SPORTS Top 10 all season (Now ranked 4th) – 3rd appearance in a row at the National Championship BREF HISTORIQUE DE L'ÉQUIPE / BRIEF HISTORY – A effectué ses débuts sur le circuit U SPORTS en 2001-2002 – Participe au championnat U SPORTS pour la 12e fois de son histoire – Tentera de remporter la 6e médaille de son histoire au championnat U SPORTS (bronze en 2003, 2006, 2008, argent en 2017 et or en 2018) – Debut in U SPORTS in 2001-2002 PRÉSENCES CHAMPIONNAT. U – 12th appearance at the U SPORTS Championship SPORTS – Will try to win its 6th medal in history (bronze in 2003, U SPORTS CHAMPIONSHIP. 2006, 2008, silver in 2017 and gold in 2018) APPEARANCES Year Position CLASSEMENT / STANDINGS 2018 1st 2017 2nd RSEQ 2014 6th Team GP W L N GF GA PTS 2013 5th UQTR 12 10 2 0 29 11 30 2011 Consolation loss MONTRÉAL 12 9 1 2 29 10 29 2008 3rd 2007 7th LAVAL 12 5 5 2 19 16 17 2006 3rd CONCORDIA 12 3 4 6 19 20 14 2005 6th UQAM 12 4 6 2 18 16 14 2004 5th MCGILL 12 3 7 2 19 23 11 SHERBROOKE 12 1 10 1 9 46 4 2003 3rd RÉSULTATS MATCH PAR MATCH – SCHEDULE RESULTS SAISON RÉGULIÈRE / REGULAR SEASON DATE TIME OPPONENT PLACE RESULT GOAL SCORERS AOÛT / AUGUST Mer.
    [Show full text]
  • (Faqs) on the Use of Herbicides in Canadian Forestry D.G
    Canadian Forest Service - Sault Ste. Marie Technical Note No. 112 Frequently Asked Questions (FAQs) On the Use of Herbicides in Canadian Forestry D.G. Thompson, D.G. Pitt Introduction Forest herbicide application is an important silvicultural tool in the day or a smaller amount and frequency of occurrence such as an regeneration of Canada’s forests. Currently in Ontario, herbicides occasional glass of wine with dinner); are applied to approximately 70,000 ha annually, about one third of 3. in simple terms, if there is no exposure, there can be no dose, and the area regenerated each year. The Canadian forest industry relies on therefore no effect. the use of herbicides as an effective plantation management technique to ensure forest renewal and to remain competitive. However, In a manner similar to the human consumption of alcohol noted the concerned public has questioned the safety of herbicide use, above, the potential effects of a herbicide on either humans or any prompting Canadian Forest Service (CFS) scientists to use their in- wildlife species depends on the magnitude, duration, frequency and depth knowledge to answer to a number of key questions posed by route of exposure. Just as there are levels of alcohol or caffeine that members of the public. may be consumed without any noticeable or measurable effect, there are levels of exposure for wildlife or humans to herbicides for which The focus of this FAQ document is on the use of herbicides and the we cannot observe or measure a direct or indirect deleterious effect. potential risks, particularly to wildlife, that may be associated with their use.
    [Show full text]
  • Impacts of Native and Non-Native Plants on Urban Insect Communities: Are Native Plants Better Than Non-Natives?
    Impacts of Native and Non-native plants on Urban Insect Communities: Are Native Plants Better than Non-natives? by Carl Scott Clem A thesis submitted to the Graduate Faculty of Auburn University in partial fulfillment of the requirements for the Degree of Master of Science Auburn, Alabama December 12, 2015 Key Words: native plants, non-native plants, caterpillars, natural enemies, associational interactions, congeneric plants Copyright 2015 by Carl Scott Clem Approved by David Held, Chair, Associate Professor: Department of Entomology and Plant Pathology Charles Ray, Research Fellow: Department of Entomology and Plant Pathology Debbie Folkerts, Assistant Professor: Department of Biological Sciences Robert Boyd, Professor: Department of Biological Sciences Abstract With continued suburban expansion in the southeastern United States, it is increasingly important to understand urbanization and its impacts on sustainability and natural ecosystems. Expansion of suburbia is often coupled with replacement of native plants by alien ornamental plants such as crepe myrtle, Bradford pear, and Japanese maple. Two projects were conducted for this thesis. The purpose of the first project (Chapter 2) was to conduct an analysis of existing larval Lepidoptera and Symphyta hostplant records in the southeastern United States, comparing their species richness on common native and alien woody plants. We found that, in most cases, native plants support more species of eruciform larvae compared to aliens. Alien congener plant species (those in the same genus as native species) supported more species of larvae than alien, non-congeners. Most of the larvae that feed on alien plants are generalist species. However, most of the specialist species feeding on alien plants use congeners of native plants, providing evidence of a spillover, or false spillover, effect.
    [Show full text]