DOCSLIB.ORG

X:\RTW Proposal\Diss\Dissdraft3a.Wpd

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text

Load more

THE POLITICS OF UNION DECLINE: BUSINESS POLITICAL MOBILIZATION AND RESTRICTIVE LABOR LEGISLATION, 1938 TO 1960 DISSERTATION Presented in Partial Fulfillment of the Requirements for the Degree Doctor of Philosophy in the Graduate School of The Ohio State University By Marc Dixon, M.A. The Ohio State University 2005 Dissertation Committee: Professor Vincent Roscigno, Advisor Approved By Professor Randy Hodson Professor J. Craig Jenkins ___________________ Advisor Graduate Program in Sociology ABSTRACT This dissertation considers how business groups mobilized politically to deal with the “labor question” that exploded within various regions of the U.S. during the 1930s. I extend organizational, political, and cultural framing perspectives on social movements to address how a seemingly ascendant union movement suffered such a series of political setbacks during a period of unparalleled strength. Drawing on event history techniques as well as historical case study methods, I analyze the surge of restrictive labor legislation that spread across states between 1938 and 1960, and especially the growth of the Right-to-Work movement that sought to limit union activity and contain labor to a narrow geographic space. The analyses speak to the enduring question for political sociologists and social movement scholars of how social movements and their opponents affect the political process. Event history results reveal that business and labor organization are meaningful for policy adoption in their own right. Political opportunities, and the presence of sympathetic law-makers in particular, are also influential in determining where and when social movement actors may be successful in securing favorable legislation. Just how business and labor actors attempt to sway policy, however, is more complex. Findings indeed reveal distinct regional variation in the unfolding of Right-to-Work struggles during these pivotal years, and suggest that there are multiple routes to policy change. Historical case studies of representative anti-labor campaigns extend these insights further, and inform our understanding of how social movements matter. The cases suggest a number of mechanisms though which social movements and countermovements may influence the political process, and point to the importance of framing in particular. The historical insights also extend the quantitative findings ii by bringing focus to, and illustrating the importance of, the interaction of these contenders at a more proximate level in addition to their presence or absence across states. This study advances social movement perspectives by probing the political mobilization and cultural work of more elite actors, employers, and their associations, and their bearing on a range of movement processes. The project also provides an important historical window into the political relations of business groups and labor unions in the U.S., and demonstrates the relative success of employer efforts to curtail labor organization. iii Dedicated to My Parents iv ACKNOWLEDGMENTS Many people assisted me throughout the research and writing of this dissertation. Some of the research was supported by a Human Rights Research Award from the Department of Sociology at Ohio State University, and by a National Science Foundation Dissertation Improvement Award. I am also indebted to the assistance of several archivists and librarians, particularly those at the George Meany Archives, the Hagley Archives, the Ohio Historical Society, and the Walter Reuther Archives. Several friends, colleagues, and scholars who provided encouragement, read portions of the work, and otherwise helped me along the way are Dennis Condron, David Jacobs, Nella Van Dyke, James Moody, Dan Tope, Elizabeth Fones-Wolf, Greg Hooks, Zhenchao Qian, Brian Kowalski, Andrew Martin, Steve Lopez, Ryan Light, Warren Van Tyne, Bill Form, and Seth Feinberg. I wish to thank my committee for the invaluable insight and support they provided throughout the process. Randy Hodson and Craig Jenkins helped me think broadly about social movements, business groups, and political change. And I am especially grateful to my advisor, Vincent Roscigno. He read countless drafts, provided critical insight, and always reminded me of the larger goals of the research. This support helped me improve the project at every step of the way. Finally, I thank Melissa Horwitz, who listened patiently, critiqued, read drafts, and provided the encouragement that enabled me to finish this project. v VITA October 26, 1974............................................Born – St. Johnsbury, Vermont 2001................................................................M.A., Sociology, The Ohio State University 1999 to Present...............................................Graduate Teaching and Research Associate, The Ohio State University PUBLICATIONS Dixon, Marc, Vincent J. Roscigno and Randy Hodson. 2004. “Unions, Solidarity, and Striking.” Social Forces 83: 3-33. Dixon, Marc. 2004. “Status Divisions and Worker Mobilization.” Sociological Spectrum 24: 369 – 396. Dixon, Marc and Vincent J. Roscigno. 2003. “Status, Networks, and Social Movement Participation: The Case of Striking Workers.” American Journal of Sociology 108: 1292 - 1327. FIELDS OF STUDY Major Field: Sociology vi TABLE OF CONTENTS Page Abstract....................................................................................................................ii Dedication................................................................................................................iv Acknowledgments....................................................................................................v Vita..........................................................................................................................vi List of Tables...........................................................................................................xiii List of Figures..........................................................................................................ix Chapters: 1. Introduction...................................................................................................1 2. Approaches to the Labor Question Following the New Deal.......................15 3. The Politics of Social Movements................................................................51 4. Data and Analytic Strategy...........................................................................82 5. Event History Analysis of Right-to-Work....................................................110 6. Business Mobilization and Labor Defeat......................................................134 7. Right-to-Work in the Industrial Heartland....................................................163 8. Discussion and Conclusion...........................................................................193 Appendix A. Descriptive Statistics...........................................................................210 Appendix B. Archival and Quantitative Data Sources..............................................212 References.................................................................................................................214 vii LIST OF TABLES Table Page 4.1 Right-to-Work Victories, 1944 - 1960...............................................................106 4.2 Key Independent Variables................................................................................107 4.3 Texas and Ohio Cases.........................................................................................118 5.1 Discrete Time Event History Estimates of Right-to-Work.................................129 5.2 Discrete Time Event History Estimates of Right-to-Work.................................130 5.3 Discrete Time Event History Estimates, Excluding the South Region...............131 5.4 Discrete Time Event History Estimates, Within the South Only........................132 A.1 Descriptive Statistics for Control Variables.......................................................210 A.2 Correlation Matrix..............................................................................................211 viii LIST OF FIGURES Figure Page 2.1 States Passing Early Restrictions on Union Organizing Tactics.........................48 2.2 Business Appeals for Right-to-Work..................................................................49 2.3 States With Right-to-Work Laws in 1947..........................................................50 4.1 Continuum of Political Struggle........................................................................109 5.1 Expected Probability of Right-to-Work Passage...............................................133 6.1 Labor Divisions in the Postwar Years...............................................................161 6.2 Business Claims in Texas..................................................................................162 7.1 Right-to-Work Battleground States in the late 1950s.......................................190 7.2 The New Labor Response.................................................................................191 7.3 Right-to-Work Advocates Target Women and Families..................................192 ix CHAPTER 1 INTRODUCTION This study examines how business groups mobilized politically to reshape the New Deal to their advantage, and particularly how they dealt with the “labor question” that exploded on the scene in the 1930s. The turbulent decade saw the birth of the modern industrial union movement and the emergence
Recommended publications
  • Performative Citizenship in the Civil Rights and Immigrant Rights Movements

    Performative Citizenship in the Civil Rights and Immigrant Rights Movements

    Performative Citizenship in the Civil Rights and Immigrant Rights Movements Kathryn Abrams In August 2013, Maria Teresa Kumar, the executive director of Voto Lat mo, spoke aJongside civil rights leaders at the fiftieth anniversary of the March on Washington. A month earlier, immigrant activists invited the Reverend Al Sharpton to join a press conference outside the federal court building as they celebrated a legal victory over joe Arpaio, the anti-immigrant sheriff of Maricopa County. Undocumented youth orga­ nizing for immigration reform explained their persistence with Marlin Luther King's statement that "the arc of the moral universe is long, but it bends towardjustice." 1 The civil rights movement remains a potent reminder that politically marginalized groups can shape the Jaw through mobilization and col­ lective action. This has made the movement a crucial source of sym­ bolism for those activists who have come after. But it has also been a source of what sociologist Doug McAdam has called "cultural innova­ uons"2: transformative strategies and tactics that can be embraced and modified by later movements. This chapter examines the legacy of the Civil Rights Act by revisiting the social movement that produced it and comparing that movement to a recent and galvanizing successor, the movement for immigrant rights.3 This movement has not simply used the storied tactics of the civil rights movement; it has modified them 2 A Nation of Widening Opportunities in ways that render them more performative: undocumented activists implement the familiar tactics that enact, in daring and surprising ways, the public belonging to which they aspire.4 This performative dimen­ sion would seem to distinguish the immigrant rights movement, at the level of organizational strategy, from its civil rights counterpart, whose participants were constitutionally acknowledged as citizens.
  • DOUG Mcadam CURRENT POSITION

    DOUG Mcadam CURRENT POSITION

    DOUG McADAM CURRENT POSITION: The Ray Lyman Wilbur Professor of Sociology (with affiliations in American Studies, Comparative Studies in Race and Ethnicity, and the Interdisciplinary Program in Environmental Research) Stanford University Stanford, CA 94305 PRIOR POSITIONS: Fall 2001 – Summer 2005 Director, Center for Advanced Study in the Behavioral Sciences, Stanford, CA Fall 1998 – Summer 2001 Professor, Department of Sociology, Stanford University Spring 1983 - Summer 1998 Assistant to Full Professor, Department of Sociology, University of Arizona Fall 1979 - Winter 1982 Assistant Professor, Department of Sociology, George Mason University EDUCATION: 1973 Occidental College Los Angeles, California B.S., Sociology 1977 State University of New York at Stony Brook Stony Brook, New York M.A., Sociology 1979 State University of New York at Stony Brook Stony Brook, New York Ph.D., Sociology FELLOWSHIPS AND OTHER HONORS: Post Graduate Visiting Scholar, Russell Sage Foundation, 2013-14. DOUG McADAM Page 2 Granted 2013 “Award for Distinguished Scholar,” by University of Wisconsin, Whitewater, March 2013. Named the Ray Lyman Wilbur Professor of Sociology, 2013. Awarded the 2012 Joseph B. and Toby Gittler Prize, Brandeis University, November 2012 Invited to deliver the Gunnar Myrdal Lecture at Stockholm University, May 2012 Invited to deliver the 2010-11 “Williamson Lecture” at Lehigh University, October 2010. Named a Phi Beta Kappa Society Visiting Scholar for 2010-11. Named Visiting Scholar at the Russell Sage Foundation for 2010-11. (Forced to turn down the invitation) Co-director of a 2010 Social Science Research Council pre-dissertation workshop on “Contentious Politics.” Awarded the 2010 Jonathan M. Tisch College of Citizenship and Public Service Research Prize, given annually to a scholar for their contributions to the study of “civic engagement.” Awarded the John D.
  • Revolutionary Syndicalist Opposition to the First World War: A

    Revolutionary Syndicalist Opposition to the First World War: A

    Re-evaluating syndicalist opposition to the First World War Darlington, RR http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/0023656X.2012.731834 Title Re-evaluating syndicalist opposition to the First World War Authors Darlington, RR Type Article URL This version is available at: http://usir.salford.ac.uk/id/eprint/19226/ Published Date 2012 USIR is a digital collection of the research output of the University of Salford. Where copyright permits, full text material held in the repository is made freely available online and can be read, downloaded and copied for non-commercial private study or research purposes. Please check the manuscript for any further copyright restrictions. For more information, including our policy and submission procedure, please contact the Repository Team at: [email protected]. Re-evaluating Syndicalist Opposition to the First World War Abstract It has been argued that support for the First World War by the important French syndicalist organisation, the Confédération Générale du Travail (CGT) has tended to obscure the fact that other national syndicalist organisations remained faithful to their professed workers’ internationalism: on this basis syndicalists beyond France, more than any other ideological persuasion within the organised trade union movement in immediate pre-war and wartime Europe, can be seen to have constituted an authentic movement of opposition to the war in their refusal to subordinate class interests to those of the state, to endorse policies of ‘defencism’ of the ‘national interest’ and to abandon the rhetoric of class conflict. This article, which attempts to contribute to a much neglected comparative historiography of the international syndicalist movement, re-evaluates the syndicalist response across a broad geographical field of canvas (embracing France, Italy, Spain, Ireland, Britain and America) to reveal a rather more nuanced, ambiguous and uneven picture.
  • A Century of Struggle

    A Century of Struggle

    A Century of Struggle To mark the 100th anniversary of the formation of the American Federation of Labor, the National Museum of American History of the Smithsonian Institution invited a group of scholars and practitioners "to examine the work, technology, and culture of industrial America . " The conference was produced in cooperation with the American Federation of Labor and Congress of Industrial Organizations . The excerpts on the following pages are drawn from papers and comments at that conference, in the Museum's Carmichael Auditorium, November IS and 16, 1986. Mary Kay Rieg, Olivia G. Amiss, and Marsha Domzalski of the Monthly Labor Review provided editorial assistance. Trade unions mirror society in conflict between collectivism and individualism A duality common to many institutions runs through the American labor movement and has marked its shifting fortunes from the post-Civil War period to the present ALICE KESSLER-HARRIS ideology of American trade unions as they developed in Two competing ideas run through the labor movement, as and post-Civil War period. It also tells us something of their they have run through the American past. The first is the the The conglomeration of unions that formed the Na- notion of community-the sense that liberty is nurtured in impact . Union and the 15,000 assemblies of the an informal political environment where the voluntary and tional Labor of Labor responded to the onslaught of industrial- collective enterprise of people with common interests con- Knights the Civil War by searching for ways to reestablish tributes to the solution of problems . Best characterized by ism after of interest that was threatened by a new and the town meeting, collective solutions are echoed in the the community organization of work.
  • Michael Reich

    Michael Reich

    St. John's University St. John's Scholar Theses and Dissertations 2020 eliberative Democracy in the Writing Classroom and Beyond Author(s): Michael Reich Michael Reich Follow this and additional works at: https://scholar.stjohns.edu/theses_dissertations Part of the Philosophy Commons, and the Rhetoric and Composition Commons DELIBERATIVE DEMOCRACY IN THE WRITING CLASSROOM AND BEYOND A dissertation submitted in partial fulfillment of the requirements for the degree of DOCTOR OF PHILOSOPHY to the faculty of the DEPARTMENT OF ENGLISH of ST. JOHN’S COLLEGE OF LIBERAL ARTS AND SCIENCES at ST. JOHN’S UNIVERSITY New York by Michael Reich Date Submitted: ___________________ Date Approved: ___________________ _________________________________ ________________________________ Michael Reich Dr. Granville Ganter © Copyright by Michael Reich 2020 All Rights Reserved ABSTRACT DELIBERATIVE DEMOCRACY IN THE WRITING CLASSROOOM AND BEYOND Michael Reich In this dissertation I explore the consequences of adopting a deliberative pedagogy, based on the study of one or two sample courses taught in 2018 at St. John’s University. The project as a whole argues that the university should be an idea place for students to develop a sense of personal and political agency, and First Year Writing courses organized around deliberation allow students to learn to listen and reason with each other as individuals and as citizens. My first chapter defends the methodology of a humanistic idea of deliberation (a pedagogy not based in classroom drills or Standard English) and where I also worry that the soft and fuzzy notion of deliberation that I practice collides with the measurement of my students’ “progress” on objective rubrics .
  • Industrial Unionism

    Industrial Unionism

    of a Workers’ Union on I.W.W. Lines of UniononI.W.W. aWorkers’ Workers ofWorkers inAotearoa theWorld Industrial Unionism The History of theIndustrial Aim, Form, andTactics REBEL PRESS ~ & Anti-copyright 2007. Published by Rebel Press P.O. Box 9263 Te Aro Te Whanganui a Tara (Wellington) Aotearoa (New Zealand) Email: [email protected] Web: www.rebelpress.org.nz ISBN: 978-0-473-12021-4 Printed on 100% recycled paper. Hand bound with a hatred for the State infused into every page. Set in 11/15pt Adobe Garamond Pro. Titles in Abadi MT. The Industrial Workers of the World in Aotearoa Peter Steiner, 2006 etween 1908 and 1913 the Industrial Workers of the World (I.W.W.) were Ba small organisation in New Zealand whose infl uence was tremendous amongst working people. By means of hundreds of propaganda meetings, thou- sands of pamphlets and in particular their paper, the Industrial Unionist, the Wobblies (I.W.W. members) spread their revolutionary ideas wide and far. Th e big strike actions of 1912/13 can be attributed to workers uniting as a class inspired by revolutionary ideas. Th e transient nature of workers at that time also contributed to Wobbly ideas reaching every corner of the English speaking countries within a few years. However, it also made organising diffi cult due to the short-lived groups. Th e history of the I.W.W. challenges traditional histori- cal understandings, as historians tend to argue that, while workers lost in 1913, they were eventually victorious in 1935 with the election of the fi rst Labour Government.
  • Seattle's Minimum Wage Experience 2015-16

    Seattle's Minimum Wage Experience 2015-16

    Chairs Sylvia A. Allegretto Michael Reich CWED Policy Brief Seattle’s Minimum Wage Experience 2015-16 By Michael Reich, Sylvia Allegretto, and Anna Godoey June 2017 Michael Reich is a Professor at UC Berkeley and Co-Chair of the Center on Wage and Employment Dynamics (CWED) at UC Berkeley’s Institute for Research on Labor and Employment. Dr. Sylvia Allegretto is a Research Economist and Co-Chair of CWED. Dr. Anna Godoey is a post-doctoral researcher at CWED. We acknowledge support from the University of California and the Ford Foundation and we are grateful to Arindrajit Dube and Ben Zipperer for their sage advice. ABSTRACT This brief on Seattle’s minimum wage experience represents the first in a series that CWED will be issuing on the effects of the current wave of minimum wage policies—those that range from $12 to $15. Upcoming CWED reports will present similar studies of Chicago, Oakland, San Francisco, San Jose and New York City, among others. The timing of these reports will depend in part upon when quality data become available. We focus here on Seattle because it was one of the early movers. Seattle implemented the first phase of its minimum wage law on April 1, 2015, raising minimum wages from the statewide $9.47 to $10 or $11, depending upon business size, presence of tipped workers and employer provision of health insurance. The second phase began on January 1, 2016, further raising the minimum to four different levels, ranging from $10.50 to $13, again depending upon employer size, presence of tipped workers and provision of health insurance.
  • GEOGRAPHY and SOCIAL MOVEMENTS Comparing

    GEOGRAPHY and SOCIAL MOVEMENTS Comparing

    GEOGRAPHY AND SOCIAL MOVEMENTS Social Movements, Protest, and Contention Series Editor: Bert Klandermans, Free University, Amsterdam Associate Editors: Sidney Tarrow, Cornell University Verta A. Taylor, The Ohio State University Ron R. Aminzade, University of Minnesota Volume 12 Byron A. Miller, Geography and Social Movements: Comparing Antinuclear Activism in the Boston Area Volume 11 Mona N. Younis, Liberation and Democratization: The South African and Palestinian National Movements Volume 10 Marco Giugni, Doug McAdam, and Charles Tilly, editors, How Social Movements Matter Volume 9 Cynthia Irvin, Militant Nationalism: Between Movement and Party in Ireland and the Basque Country Volume 8 Raka Ray, Fields of Protest: Women’s Movements in India Volume 7 Michael P. Hanagan, Leslie Page Moch, and Wayne te Brake, editors, Challenging Authority: The Historical Study of Contentious Politics Volume 6 Donatella della Porta and Herbert Reiter, editors, Policing Protest: The Control of Mass Demonstrations in Western Democracies Volume 5 Hanspeter Kriesi, Ruud Koopmans, Jan Willem Duyvendak, and Marco G. Giugni, New Social Movements in Western Europe: A Comparative Analysis Volume 4 Hank Johnston and Bert Klandermans, editors, Social Movements and Culture Volume 3 J. Craig Jenkins and Bert Klandermans, editors, The Politics of Social Protest: Comparative Perspectives on States and Social Movements Volume 2 John Foran, editor, A Century of Revolution: Social Movements in Iran Volume 1 Andrew Szasz, EcoPopulism: Toxic Waste and the Movement for Environmental Justice GEOGRAPHY AND SOCIAL MOVEMENTS Comparing Antinuclear Activism in the Boston Area Byron A. Miller Social Movements, Protest, and Contention Volume 12 University of Minnesota Press Minneapolis • London Portions of this book were previously published in “Collective Action and Rational Choice: Place, Community, and the Limits to Individual Self-Interest,” Economic Geography 68, no.
  • Mpsa Paper on Trans Capitalism

    Mpsa Paper on Trans Capitalism

    April 2016 Postsocialist crises and the rise of transnational capitalism in Eastern Europe: a theoretical framework for comparative analysis1 Besnik Pula Department of Political Science Virginia Tech [email protected] There is no question today of the deep institutional divergence of the postsocialist economies of Eastern Europe. The vision and designs of postsocialist reform in the early years aimed at turning Eastern European economies into capitalist economies akin to those of western Europe. But the outcomes of reform have been a plethora of capitalisms, which distinct and widely varying roles played by the state, domestic capitalists, transnational corporations, and workers. To examine this process of change, this paper offers a theoretical framework that explains why some East European economies became more embedded in transnational production than others. Its focus is on the political economy of institutional change. It assumes that economic institutional change is most dramatic under conditions of economic crisis. In the case of East European transformations, it sees the return of economic crises in the late 1990s as such episodes, serving as critical turning points in postsocialist efforts attempts to institute stable regimes of accumulation. 1 Working paper drawn from current manuscript on a comparative analysis of the making of postsocialist capitalisms, presented at the CEEISA-ISA International Conference (Ljubljana, June 23-25, 2016). Please direct comments to the author at [email protected]. 1 In the early years of reform, the reigning “transition paradigm” (Carothers 2002) in the study of East European transformations assumed East European states and economies to be headed towards the same endpoints of liberal democracy and liberal market capitalism.
  • Maintaining and Industrial Peace in the East Tennessee Copper Basin from the Great War Through the Second World War

    Maintaining and Industrial Peace in the East Tennessee Copper Basin from the Great War Through the Second World War

    Georgia State University ScholarWorks @ Georgia State University History Dissertations Department of History 3-19-2010 Removing Reds from the Old Red Scar: Maintaining and Industrial Peace in the East Tennessee Copper Basin from the Great War through the Second World War William Ronald Simson Georgia State University Follow this and additional works at: https://scholarworks.gsu.edu/history_diss Part of the History Commons Recommended Citation Simson, William Ronald, "Removing Reds from the Old Red Scar: Maintaining and Industrial Peace in the East Tennessee Copper Basin from the Great War through the Second World War." Dissertation, Georgia State University, 2010. https://scholarworks.gsu.edu/history_diss/17 This Dissertation is brought to you for free and open access by the Department of History at ScholarWorks @ Georgia State University. It has been accepted for inclusion in History Dissertations by an authorized administrator of ScholarWorks @ Georgia State University. For more information, please contact [email protected]. REMOVING REDS FROM THE OLD RED SCAR: MAINTAINING AN INDUSTRIAL PEACE IN THE EAST TENNESSEE COPPER BASIN, FROM THE GREAT WAR THROUGH THE SECOND WORLD WAR by WILLIAM R. SIMSON ABSTRACT This study considers industrial society and development in the East Tennessee Copper Basin from the 1890s through World War II; its main focus will be on the primary industrial concern, Tennessee Copper Company (TCC 1899), owned by the Lewisohn Group, New York. The study differs from other Appalachian scholarship in its assessment of New South industries generally overlooked. Wars and increased reliance on organic chemicals tied the basin to defense needs and agricultural advance. Locals understood the basin held expanding economic opportunities superior to those in the surrounding mountains and saw themselves as participants in the nation’s industrial and economic progress, and a vital part of its defense.
  • SOCIOLOGY 9191A Social Science in the Marxian Tradition Fall 2020

    SOCIOLOGY 9191A Social Science in the Marxian Tradition Fall 2020

    SOCIOLOGY 9191A Social Science in the Marxian Tradition Fall 2020 DRAFT Class times and location Wednesday 10:30am -12:30pm Virtual synchronous Instructor: David Calnitsky Office Hours by appointment Department of Sociology Office: SSC 5402 Email: [email protected] Technical Requirements: Stable internet connection Laptop or computer Working microphone Working webcam “The philosophers have only interpreted the world, in various ways. The point, however, is to change it.” – Karl Marx That is the point, it’s true—but not in this course. This quote, indirectly, hints at a deep tension in Marxism. If we want to change the world we need to understand it. But the desire to change something can infect our understanding of it. This is a pervasive dynamic in the history of Marxism and the first step is to admit there is a problem. This means acknowledging the presence of wishful thinking, without letting it induce paralysis. On the other hand, if there are pitfalls in being upfront in your desire to change the world there are also virtues. The normative 1 goal of social change helps to avoid common trappings of academia, in particular, the laser focus on irrelevant questions. Plus, in having a set of value commitments, stated clearly, you avoid the false pretense that values don’t enter in the backdoor in social science, which they often do if you’re paying attention. With this caveat in place, Marxian social science really does have a lot to offer in understanding the world and that’s what we’ll analyze in this course. The goal is to look at the different hypotheses that broadly emerge out of the Marxian tradition and see the extent to which they can be supported both theoretically and empirically.
  • Visual Media and the Fate of Nonviolent Social Movement Activism

    Visual Media and the Fate of Nonviolent Social Movement Activism

    University of Pennsylvania ScholarlyCommons Publicly Accessible Penn Dissertations 2012 From Print to Pixel: Visual Media and The Fate of Nonviolent Social Movement Activism Ksenia O. Gorbenko University of Pennsylvania, [email protected] Follow this and additional works at: https://repository.upenn.edu/edissertations Part of the Sociology Commons Recommended Citation Gorbenko, Ksenia O., "From Print to Pixel: Visual Media and The Fate of Nonviolent Social Movement Activism" (2012). Publicly Accessible Penn Dissertations. 636. https://repository.upenn.edu/edissertations/636 This paper is posted at ScholarlyCommons. https://repository.upenn.edu/edissertations/636 For more information, please contact [email protected]. From Print to Pixel: Visual Media and The Fate of Nonviolent Social Movement Activism Abstract In order to be heard or seen, nonviolent social movements (NVSMs) require an audience. News images of nonviolent protests become the means through which awareness of social movements is created. Comparative historical and semiotic analysis of journalistic images demonstrates that violence is a prominent theme within news coverage of nonviolent struggles. Four types of violence within nonviolence are identified: state violence, third-party violence, self-inflicted violence and symbolic violence. The examination of news images of these four types of violence showed the different ways in which challengers and the state contest power in the public domain through the media, in both text and images. Various actors (the state, social movements, journalists, the audience) use news images to historicize and construct their narratives of unfolding events, as well as make transhistorical claims. In this process, they deliberately employ news images to advocate for their causes, align themselves with previous heroes of civil disobedience and play on the popular understandings of good and evil.