Snowmelt and Frozen Soil [Based on Class Notes by Erin Brooks and the Text by Dingman (2002)]

Total Page:16

File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

Snowmelt and Frozen Soil [Based on Class Notes by Erin Brooks and the Text by Dingman (2002)] BSYSE 456/556 Lecture 4 Snowmelt and Frozen Soil [Based on class notes by Erin Brooks and the text by Dingman (2002)] I. Snow Hydrology Terms Precipitation: the depth of rainfall plus the water equivalent of snow, sleet, and hail falling during a given storm or measurement period Snowfall: the incremental depth of snow and other forms of solid precipitation accumulating on the surface during a given storm or measurement period Snowcover/snowpack: the entire accumulated snow on the ground at a time of measurement Snowmelt: the amount of liquid water produced by melting that leaves the snowpack during a given time period Occurrence Globally, all the land above 40E N latitude has a seasonal snow cover of significant duration, and snowfall contributes more than rainfall to runoff in many areas. In the Colorado Rockies about 90% of the yearly water supply is derived from snowfall. In the Bitterroot Mountains, approximately 50% and 70% of total yearly precipitation falls as snow at an elevation of 5,000- and 7,000 ft, respectively. In the Moscow–Pullman area, approximately 20% of total precipitation falls as snow (see Table 1). Table 1. Average annual precipitation for Moscow, Pullman and vicinity. Pullman Moscow Spokane Lewiston Avg. Ann. Precip. (in.) 21.5 23.5 16.1 12.8 Avg. Ann. Snowfall (in.) 28.5 49.5 41.8 15.8 Elevation (ft) 2,540 2,660 2,360 1,440 Mt. Baker, 56 mi. east of Bellingham, WA, with an elevation of 4,200 ft, recorded a world record total snowfall of 1,140 inches (95 ft) for the 1998–99 season. Its average annual snowfall is 645 inches (54 ft), the highest average value in North America. Importance of the Study of Snow Hydrology – Flood forecasting – Reservoir management – Water supply and irrigation design – Hydrologic modeling of watershed processes (surface runoff, streamflow, sediment transport, nutrient transport, depth of frozen soil) – General design (highways, culverts) – Safety and recreation (avalanche warnings, ski and road conditions forecast) 1 BSYSE 456/556 Lecture 4 General Composition and Characteristics Snow is a granular porous medium consisting of ice and pore spaces. When it is cold (temperature below 0 EC), the pore spaces contain only air (including water vapor). At the melting point, the pore spaces can contain liquid water and air, and snow becomes a three-phase system. In most practical applications, the actual depth of the snowpack is not as important as the depth of the snow water equivalent (SWE) of the snowpack (1) where hs = height of snowpack ρs = density of snow ρw = density of water Note that snowpack density may change with time and snow density within a snowpack changes with depth. In the later section on snow properties, we will revisit the term SWE. The density of snow is typically measured with a weighing snow gage. The density of snowpack changes due to rainfall, settling, metamorphism due to temperature and vapor gradients. Snowpack density will vary between 0.15 g cm!3 for new pack and 0.45 g cm!3 for a melting pack. The density of new fallen snow is determined by the configuration of the snowflakes, which is largely a function of air temperature, the degree of super-saturation in the precipitating cloud, and the wind speed at the surface of deposition. Because of the difficulty of measuring the density of new snow, an average density of 0.10 g cm!3 is often assumed. Since the density of water is 1 g cm!3, a rule of thumb is that, for new fallen snow, the SWE depth will be roughly 10% of the actually measured snow depth. In other words, 10 inches of snow is equivalent to 1 inch of water. Snowpack Metamorphism 1. Gravitational settling (rate) ! increases with overlying snow weight and the temperature of the layer ! decreases with the layer’s density 2. Destructive metamorphism ! vapor pressures higher over more curved surface, causing the points and projections of snowflakes to evaporate and deposit on nearby less convex surfaces, thus forming larger, more spherical snow grains ! The process occurs most rapidly in recently fallen snowflakes and ceases when the snow density becomes high (~ 0.25 g cm!3) 3. Constructive metamorphism ! most important pre-melt densification process ! Over short distances: the process occurring by sintering (water molecules deposit in concavities where snow grains touch and gradually build a “neck” between adjacent grains ! Over long distances: the process occurring via vapor transfer due to temperature gradients ! “Depth hoar”: forming when very cold air overlying a shallow snowpack produces an upward-decreasing temperature and vapor pressure gradient, and snow near the base evaporates 2 BSYSE 456/556 Lecture 4 resulting in a basal layer of planar crystals with low density and strength 4. Melt metamorphism ! densification by liquid water (from surface melting or as rainfall) and formation of solid ice ! disappearance of smaller snow grains and growth of larger grains All processes except the temporary “depth hoar” increase the snow density through the snow- accumulation season. Snowmelt Processes 1. Accumulation period: the period of general increase of snowpack water equivalent prior to the melt period 2. Melt period: the period when the net energy input to a snowpack becomes more or less continually positive, including three phases: (1) Warming: during which the average snowpack temperature increases until the snowpack is isothermal at 0 EC (2) Ripening: during which melting occurs but the melt water is retained in the snowpack that is isothermal at 0 EC until it cannot retain any more liquid water and is said to be ripe (3) Output: during which further energy inputs produce water output Field Measurement Snowfall measurement ! Standard method: ruler ! Universal gage: recording weight increase ! Radar: distinguish rain and snow; delineate the areal extent Snowcover measurement ! Snow stakes or rulers ! Snow survey via a snow course ! Snow pillows: made of rubber containing liquid with low freezing point; measuring pressure ! Radioactive gages: recording the attenuation of gamma rays or neutrons by water ! Microwave: measuring the areal extent Snowmelt measurement ! Lysimeters: collect the water draining from the overlying snow and then measure the flow Snow Properties Let us consider a representative portion of a snowpack of height hs and area A. Using the symbols M to designate mass, V for volume, h for height, and ρ for mass density; and the subscripts s for snow, i for ice, w for liquid water, m for water substance, a for air; we can derive the following relationships. The snow volume is (2) 3 BSYSE 456/556 Lecture 4 Fig. 1. Dimension of a representative portion of a snowpack. A is the area of the upper surface; hs is the snow depth. [Adapted from Dingman (2002, Fig. 5-1).] The porosity, φ, is defined as the ratio of pore volume to total volume (3) Therefore, (4) The liquid water content, θ, is defined as the ratio of the volume of liquid water in the snowpack to the total volume of snow: (5) Snow density, ρs, is defined as the mass per unit volume of snow, so (6) Combining Eq 3!6 allows us to relate density, liquid water content, and porosity as or (7) !3 !3 where ρi = 917 kg m and ρw = 1,000 kg m . As we mentioned earlier, for the hydrologist, the most important property of a snowpack is the SWE, 4 BSYSE 456/556 Lecture 4 often expressed as the depth of water that would result from the complete melting of the snow in place, hm. Thus, (8) where Vm is the volume of water resulting from the complete melting of the snow with the same surface area of A, and it is related to the volume of water and ice following (9) (Why?) Substituting Eq 4 and 5 into Eq 9 yields (10) Using Eq 2 and 8 to rewrite Eq 10 and dividing both sides by A gives (11) Finally, we see from Eq 7 that Eq 11 can be written as (12) (Why?) Note that this is the same equation as Eq 1. Do you have another way deriving it? Snowmelt Period Energy Needs 1. Warming phase !2 The cold content, Qcc (of dimension [E L ]), of a snowpack is the amount of energy required to raise its average temperature to the melting point, and (13) !1 !1 where ci is the heat capacity of ice (2,102 J kg K ), Ts is the average temperature of the snowpack, Tm is the melting-point temperature (273.15 K) , and the other symbols are as previously defined. The cold content can be computed at any time prior to the ripening phase, and the net energy input required to complete phase 1, Qm1, equals the cold content at the beginning of the melt period. 2. Ripening phase The liquid water retaining capacity, hwret, of a snowpack, is given as 5 BSYSE 456/556 Lecture 4 (14) and, the net energy input required to complete the ripening phase, Qm2, can be computed as (15) !1 where λf is the latent heat of fusion (0.334 MJ kg ). (Define ; understand Eq 14 by visualizing a snowpack) 3. Output phase The net energy input required to complete the output phase, Qm3, is the amount of energy needed to melt the snow remaining at the end of the ripening phase: (16) The total energy need is the sum of the energy inputs for each melt phase. (17) Snowmelt Modeling over a Watershed To accurately model the snow distribution and snowmelt over a large watershed with extensive differences in elevation and topography, information on spatially distributed air temperature and precipitation and other physical settings (e.g., soil type, geology, land use, ground cover) should be used.
Recommended publications
  • Long-Term Hydrological Response to Forest Harvest During Seasonal Low flow: Potential Implications for Current Forest Practices☆
    Science of the Total Environment 730 (2020) 138926 Contents lists available at ScienceDirect Science of the Total Environment journal homepage: www.elsevier.com/locate/scitotenv Review Long-term hydrological response to forest harvest during seasonal low flow: Potential implications for current forest practices☆ Ashley A. Coble a,⁎, Holly Barnard b, Enhao Du c, Sherri Johnson d, Julia Jones e, Elizabeth Keppeler f, Hyojung Kwon g, Timothy E. Link c, Brooke E. Penaluna d, Maryanne Reiter h, Mark River h, Klaus Puettmann g, Joseph Wagenbrenner i a National Council for Air and Stream Improvement, Inc., 227 NW Third St., Corvallis, OR 97330, USA b Department of Geography, Institute of Arctic and Alpine Research University of Colorado, Boulder, CO, USA c College of Natural Resources, University of Idaho, Moscow, ID, USA d USDA Forest Service, Pacific Northwest Research Station, Corvallis, OR, USA e Geography CEOAS, Oregon State University, Corvallis, OR, USA f USDA Forest Service, Pacific Southwest Research Station, Fort Bragg, CA, USA g Department of Forest Ecosystems and Society, Oregon State University, Corvallis, OR, USA h Weyerhaeuser Company, Springfield, OR, USA i USDA Forest Service, Pacific Southwest Research Station, Arcata, CA, USA HIGHLIGHTS GRAPHICAL ABSTRACT • Climate-related low flow declines may also be influenced by forest manage- ment. • Few studies describe multi-decade ef- fects of forest management on streamflow. • We assembled catchment studies of long-term effects of harvest (N10 years). • We define 3 periods of expected low flow responses to forest regrowth after harvest. • Decreased low flow was observed years after harvest in 16 of 25 catchments. article info abstract Article history: Seasonal changes in the magnitude and duration of streamflow can have important implications for aquatic spe- Received 24 March 2020 cies, drinking water supplies, and water quality.
    [Show full text]
  • Downloaded 09/27/21 11:47 PM UTC 25.2 METEOROLOGICAL MONOGRAPHS VOLUME 59
    CHAPTER 25 PETERS-LIDARD ET AL. 25.1 Chapter 25 100 Years of Progress in Hydrology a b c c CHRISTA D. PETERS-LIDARD, FAISAL HOSSAIN, L. RUBY LEUNG, NATE MCDOWELL, d e f g MATTHEW RODELL, FRANCISCO J. TAPIADOR, F. JOE TURK, AND ANDREW WOOD a Earth Sciences Division, NASA Goddard Space Flight Center, Greenbelt, Maryland b Department of Civil and Environmental Engineering, University of Washington, Seattle, Washington c Atmospheric Sciences and Global Change Division, Pacific Northwest National Laboratory, Richland, Washington d Hydrological Sciences Laboratory, NASA Goddard Space Flight Center, Greenbelt, Maryland e Department of Environmental Sciences, Institute of Environmental Sciences, University of Castilla–La Mancha, Toledo, Spain f Jet Propulsion Laboratory, California Institute of Technology, Pasadena, California g Research Applications Laboratory, National Center for Atmospheric Research, Boulder, Colorado ABSTRACT The focus of this chapter is progress in hydrology for the last 100 years. During this period, we have seen a marked transition from practical engineering hydrology to fundamental developments in hydrologic science, including contributions to Earth system science. The first three sections in this chapter review advances in theory, observations, and hydrologic prediction. Building on this foundation, the growth of global hydrology, land–atmosphere interactions and coupling, ecohydrology, and water management are discussed, as well as a brief summary of emerging challenges and future directions. Although the review attempts
    [Show full text]
  • Precipitation
    Definitions • Hydrologic Cycle - s a conceptual model that describes the storage and movement of water on earth • Water Budget P = ET + RO + GW + ΔS • Drainage basin is an extent or an area of land where surface water from rain, melting snow, or ice converges to a single point at a lower elevation, usually the exit of the basin, where the waters join another waterbody, such as a river, lake, reservoir, estuary, wetland, sea, or ocean. Precipitation • Precipitation - is any product of the condensation of atmospheric water vapor that falls under gravity. The main forms of precipitation include drizzle, rain, snow and hail. • Hyetograph: is a graph of cumulative precipitation through time • Intensity: precipitation over time • Frequency: Probability of occurrence of a determined rainfall event • Return Period: how frequent (in year) a determined rainfall event happen • Interception: Part of the precipitation which wets or adheres to above ground objects until return to the atmosphere through evaporation or sublimation Evapotranspiration • Evaporation: Transfer of water from land and water masses to the atmosphere • Transpiration: The process by which the plant extract water from the soil, utilize it, and expel it to the atmosphere • Evapo-transpiration (ET): Combined process of evaporation and transpiration. It is dependent upon many factors including: soil cover, vegetation, solar radiation, humidity, wind, etc. • Reference Evapotranspiration “ET0”: The reference crop evapotranspiration represents the evapotranspiration from a standardized vegetated surface. Runoff • Infiltration: Process by which precipitation moves downwards through the surface and replenishes soil moisture, recharges aquifers and supports steamflows during dry periods • Runoff: is often defined as the portion of rainfall, snowmelt, and/or irrigation water that runs over the soil surface toward the stream rather than infiltrating into the soil.
    [Show full text]
  • Modelling Snowmelt in Ungauged Catchments
    water Article Modelling Snowmelt in Ungauged Catchments Carolina Massmann 1,2 1 Institute for Hydrology and Water Management (HyWa), University of Natural Resources and Life Sciences, 1190 Vienna, Austria; [email protected] 2 Department of Civil Engineering, University of Bristol, Bristol BS8 1TR, UK Received: 20 December 2018; Accepted: 29 January 2019; Published: 11 February 2019 Abstract: Temperature-based snowmelt models are simple to implement and tend to give good results in gauged basins. The situation is, however, different in ungauged basins, as the lack of discharge data precludes the calibration of the snowmelt parameters. The main objective of this study was therefore to assess alternative approaches. This study compares the performance of two temperature-based snowmelt models (with and without an additional radiation term) and two energy-balance models with different data requirements in 312 catchments in the US. It considers the impact of: (i) the meteorological forcing, by using two gridded datasets (Livneh and MERRA-2), (ii) different approaches for calibrating the snowmelt parameters (an a priori approach and one based on Snow Data Assimilation System (SNODAS), a remote sensing-based product) and (iii) the parameterization and structure of the hydrological model used for transforming the snowmelt signal into streamflow at the basin outlet. The results show that energy-balance-based approaches achieve the best results, closely followed by the temperature-based model including a radiation term and calibrated with SNODAS data. It is also seen that data availability and quality influence the ranking of the snowmelt models. Keywords: snowmelt; day-degree approach; SNODAS; hydrological model; a priori parameter estimation; ungauged basins; model performance; data quality 1.
    [Show full text]
  • Spatial and Temporal Shifts in Historic and Future Temperature and Precipitation Patterns Related to Snow Accumulation and Melt Regimes in Alberta, Canada
    water Article Spatial and Temporal Shifts in Historic and Future Temperature and Precipitation Patterns Related to Snow Accumulation and Melt Regimes in Alberta, Canada Brandi W. Newton 1,* , Babak Farjad 2 and John F. Orwin 1 1 Airshed and Watershed Stewardship Branch, Resource Stewardship Division, Alberta Environment and Parks, 3535 Research Road NW, Calgary, AB T2L 2K8, Canada; [email protected] 2 Environmental Knowledge and Prediction Branch, Resource Stewardship Division, Alberta Environment and Parks, 3535 Research Road NW, Calgary, AB T2L 2K8, Canada; [email protected] * Correspondence: [email protected] Abstract: Shifts in winter temperature and precipitation patterns can profoundly affect snow accumu- lation and melt regimes. These shifts have varying impacts on local to large-scale hydro-ecological systems and freshwater distribution, especially in cold regions with high hydroclimatic heterogeneity. We evaluate winter climate changes in the six ecozones (Mountains, Foothills, Prairie, Parkland, Boreal, and Taiga) in Alberta, Canada, and identify regions of elevated susceptibility to change. Evaluation of historic trends and future changes in winter climate use high-resolution (~10 km) gridded data for 1950–2017 and projections for the 2050s (2041–2070) and 2080s (2071–2100) under medium (RCP 4.5) and high (RCP 8.5) emissions scenarios. Results indicate continued declines in winter duration and earlier onset of spring above-freezing temperatures from historic through future periods, with greater changes in Prairie and Mountain ecozones, and extremely short or nonexistent winter durations in future climatologies. Decreases in November–April precipitation and a shift from snow to rain Citation: Newton, B.W.; Farjad, B.; Orwin, J.F.
    [Show full text]
  • Cryosphere Water Resources Simulation and Service Function Evaluation in the Shiyang River Basin of Northwest China
    water Article Cryosphere Water Resources Simulation and Service Function Evaluation in the Shiyang River Basin of Northwest China Kailu Li 1,2, Rensheng Chen 1,* and Guohua Liu 1,2 1 Qilian Alpine Ecology and Hydrology Research Station, Key Laboratory of Ecohydrology of Inland River Basin, Northwest Institute of Eco-Environment and Resources, Chinese Academy of Sciences, Lanzhou 730000, China; [email protected] (K.L.); [email protected] (G.L.) 2 University of Chinese Academy of Sciences, Beijing 100049, China * Correspondence: [email protected] Abstract: Water is the most critical factor that restricts the economic and social development of arid regions. It is urgent to understand the impact on cryospheric changes of water resources in arid regions in western China under the background of global warming. A cryospheric basin hydrological model (CBHM) was used to simulate the runoff, especially for glaciers and snowmelt water supply, in the Shiyang River Basin (SRB). A cryosphere water resources service function model was proposed to evaluate the value of cryosphere water resources. The annual average temperature increased significantly (p > 0.05) from 1961 to 2016. The runoff of glacier and snowmelt water in the SRB decreased significantly. This reduction undoubtedly greatly weakens the runoff regulation function. The calculation and value evaluation of the amount of water resources in the cryosphere of Shiyang River Basin is helpful to the government for adjusting water structure to realize sustainable development. Keywords: climate change; the Shiyang River Basin; glacial runoff; snowmelt water; cryosphere; value evaluation Citation: Li, K.; Chen, R.; Liu, G. Cryosphere Water Resources Simulation and Service Function 1.
    [Show full text]
  • Contribution of Snow-Melt Water to the Streamflow Over the Three-River
    remote sensing Article Contribution of Snow-Melt Water to the Streamflow over the Three-River Headwater Region, China Sisi Li 1, Mingliang Liu 2 , Jennifer C. Adam 2,*,† , Huawei Pi 1,†, Fengge Su 3, Dongyue Li 4 , Zhaofei Liu 5 and Zhijun Yao 5 1 Key Research Institute of Yellow River Civilization and Sustainable Development & Collaborative Innovation Center on Yellow River Civilization Jointly Built by Henan Province and Ministry of Education, Henan University, Kaifeng 475001, China; [email protected] (S.L.); [email protected] (H.P.) 2 Department of Civil and Environmental Engineering, Washington State University, Pullman, WA 99164, USA; [email protected] 3 Key Laboratory of Tibetan Environment Changes and Land Surface Processes, Institute of Tibetan Plateau Research, Chinese Academy of Sciences, Beijing 100101, China; [email protected] 4 Department of Geography, University of California, Los Angeles, CA 90095, USA; [email protected] 5 Institute of Geographic Sciences and Natural Resources Research, Chinese Academy of Sciences, Beijing 100101, China; zfl[email protected] (Z.L.); [email protected] (Z.Y.) * Correspondence: [email protected] † These authors contributed equally to this work. Abstract: Snowmelt water is essential to the water resources management over the Three-River Headwater Region (TRHR), where hydrological processes are influenced by snowmelt runoff and sensitive to climate change. The objectives of this study were to analyse the contribution of snowmelt water to the total streamflow (fQ,snow) in the TRHR by applying a snowmelt tracking algorithm and Variable Infiltration Capacity (VIC) model. The ratio of snowfall to precipitation, and the variation of Citation: Li, S.; Liu, M.; Adam, J.C.; the April 1 snow water equivalent (SWE) associated with fQ,snow, were identified to analyse the role Pi, H.; Su, F.; Li, D.; Liu, Z.; Yao, Z.
    [Show full text]
  • Advanced Topics in Dynamics of the Cryosphere Spring 2016
    Faculty of Social Sciences Department of Geography Geography 491 A02 ADVANCED TOPICS IN DYNAMICS OF THE CRYOSPHERE SPRING 2016 Instructor: Dr. Randy Scharien Office: David Turpin Building B122 Office Hours: Monday 13:30-15:30 or by appointment E-mail: [email protected] Course Description Snow and ice dominate the Canadian landscape. There is virtually no area in Canada which escapes the influence of snow and ice. We skate on frozen ponds, ski down snow laden mountains, drive through snow blizzards and watch how ice jams in rivers cause rivers to swell and floods to occur. The duration and the thickness of snow and ice increase rapidly northwards, and glaciers are found in mountainous areas and in large parts of the Arctic region. Given that snow and ice impact heavily on the Canadian way of life, this course seeks to understand the dynamics of snow and ice in physical, climatological, and hydrological contexts. This course will examine snow properties, snowcover distribution, glacier hydrology, melt runoff, and ice in its many forms (lake ice, river ice, sea ice, and ground ice). The application of remote sensing and other remote observing systems to understanding the cryosphere will be examined. This course will also examine the implications of climate change on the cryosphere in Canada and beyond. Class Meetings Monday and Thursday 08:30-09:50 CLE B415 Text and Readings There is no required text for this course. Assigned readings will be posted on CourseSpaces (http://CourseSpaces.uvic.ca). If necessary, readings may be made available on the course reserve in the main library.
    [Show full text]
  • Snowmelt and Peak Streamflow Relationships for the Big Wood River in Southeast Idaho Mike Huston NOAA/NWS Forecast Office Pocatello, Idaho
    Snowmelt and Peak Streamflow Relationships for the Big Wood River in Southeast Idaho Mike Huston NOAA/NWS Forecast Office Pocatello, Idaho 1. INTRODUCTION Peak streamflow within southeast Idaho generally occurs as a result of spring snowmelt (see unpublished Natural Resource Conservation Service (NRCS) document). Although rain-on-snow events have been known to produce some of the largest peak flows on record, their frequency of occurrence is considerably lower. Numerous researchers have exploited similar knowledge in developing statistical snowmelt and peak streamflow relationships for river basins across the West (Farnes, 1984; Sarantitis and Palmer, 1988; Ferguson et al., 2015). In an effort to provide stakeholders with predictive tools to estimate peak streamflow and timing as a result of snowmelt, the NRCS routinely generates Snow-Stream Comparison charts for a number of select basins within Idaho (https://www.nrcs.usda.gov). Unfortunately, relationships for many of the basins within southeast Idaho have not been developed. The primary objective of this study was to develop the programs and methodologies needed to establish snowmelt and peak streamflow relationships for the Big Wood River basin. These tools would then be used at a later date to produce similar relationships in the remaining headwater basins within southeast Idaho as well as provide stakeholders with additional decision support information well in advance of potential flood events. 2. METHODOLOGY and RESULTS Historical daily snow water equivalent (SWE) values along with supplemental meteorological data were obtained for six automated snow telemetry (SNOTEL) sites within the Big Wood River basin (Chocolate Gulch, Dollarhide Summit, Galena, Galena Summit, Hyndman, and Lost Wood Divide) (Fig.
    [Show full text]
  • Duluth Metropolitan Area Streams Snowmelt Runoff Study
    Duluth Metropolitan Area Streams Snowmelt Runoff Study By: Jesse Anderson, Tom Estabrooks and Julie McDonnell Minnesota Pollution Control Agency March 2000 Table of Contents Executive Summary………………………………………………………………... 3 Introduction………………………………………………………………………… 4 Purpose and Scope…………………………………………………………………. 11 Methods……………………………………………………………………………. 12 Results……………………………………………………………………………… 14 Discussion………………………………………………………………………….. 15 Acknowledgments…………………………………………………………………. 25 Literature Cited……………………………………………………………….……. 25 Appendix 1. Water Quality Data…………………………………………………... 27 Appendix 2. QA/QC Data…………………………………………………………. 28 Appendix 3. Site Locations………………………………………………………… 29 List of Figures Figure 1. Location of the Study Area…………………………………………… 5 Figure 2. Duluth Metropolitan Area Stream Sampling Sites……………………. 6 Figure 3. Land Uses in Select Duluth Metropolitan Area Stream Watersheds…... 7 Figure 4. A Storm Hydrograph…………………………………………………… 12 Figure 5. Nutrient and Sediment Concentrations and Streamflow at Amity Creek Site #1………………………………………………………. 16 Figure 6. Total Suspended Sediment Yields During Snowmelt…………………… 17 Figure 7. Total Suspended Sediment Yields During Baseflow……………………..17 Figure 8. Total Phosphorus Yields During Snowmelt………………………………18 Figure 9. Total Phosphorus Yields During Baseflow……………………………….18 Figure 10. Total Nitrogen Yields During Snowmelt………………………………..19 Figure 11. Total Nitrogen Yields During Baseflow…………………………………19 Figure 12. Miller Creek Chloride Concentrations During Snowmelt at Site #1……………………………………………………………………….20
    [Show full text]
  • Peak Flows from Snowmelt Runoff in the Sierra Nevada, USA
    Snow, Efydrolow and Forests in ISOi Alpine Areas/Proceedings of the Vienna Symposium, August 1991). IAHS Publ. no. 235, 1991. Peak flows from snowmelt runoff in the Sierra Nevada, USA RICHARD KATTELMANN University of California, Sierra Nevada Aquatic Research Lab Star Route 1, Box 198, Mammoth Lakes, CA 93546, USA ABSTRACT Snowmelt runoff in the Sierra Nevada of California fills rivers with vast quantities of water over several weeks, although it does not cause the highest flood peaks. Snowmelt flood peaks are limited by the radiant energy available for melt, shading by terrain and forest canopies, proportion of the catchment contributing snowmelt, and synchronization of flows in tributaries. The volume, duration, timing and peak of snowmelt floods may change systematically with a warmer climate and reductions in forest density and area. INTRODUCTION Snowmelt floods are the main hydrologie event in the rivers of the Sierra Nevada. Each spring, the precipitation of winter is released from its storage as the snow cover of the Sierra Nevada to become streamflow. The snowmelt runoff provides sustained high water in the rivers for a two or three month-long period. In most years, the spring snowmelt flood is readily managed by California's network of reservoirs and aqueducts to deliver water for irrigation and urban use throughout the state. However, in some years, the seasonal volume of runoff exceeds the artificial storage capacity and riparian areas and low-lying parts of the San Joaquin Valley are flooded. Although engineering aspects of these largest snowmelt floods have received considerable attention, there has been little study of their basic characteristics.
    [Show full text]
  • Snowmelt Runoff Modeling: Limitations and Potential for Mitigating Water Disputes
    University of Wisconsin Milwaukee UWM Digital Commons Geography Faculty Articles Geography 2012 Snowmelt Runoff oM deling: Limitations and Potential for Mitigating Water Disputes Jonathan Kult University of Wisconsin - Milwaukee Woonsup Choi University of Wisconsin - Milwaukee, [email protected] Anke Petra Maria Keuser University of Wisconsin - Milwaukee Follow this and additional works at: https://dc.uwm.edu/geog_facart Part of the Hydrology Commons, Physical and Environmental Geography Commons, and the Water Resource Management Commons Recommended Citation Kult, Jonathan; Choi, Woonsup; and Keuser, Anke Petra Maria, "Snowmelt Runoff odeM ling: Limitations and Potential for Mitigating Water Disputes" (2012). Geography Faculty Articles. 2. https://dc.uwm.edu/geog_facart/2 This Article is brought to you for free and open access by UWM Digital Commons. It has been accepted for inclusion in Geography Faculty Articles by an authorized administrator of UWM Digital Commons. For more information, please contact [email protected]. 1 Snowmelt runoff modeling: Limitations and potential for mitigating 2 water disputes 3 4 NOTICE: This is the author’s version of a work that was accepted for publication in Journal of 5 Hydrology. Changes resulting from the publishing process, such as peer review, editing, 6 corrections, structural formatting, and other quality control mechanisms may not be reflected in 7 this document. Changes may have been made to this work since it was submitted for publication. 8 A definitive version was subsequently published in
    [Show full text]