Scanned Document

Total Page:16

File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

Scanned Document Utmost Gallantry THE U.S. AND ROYAL NAVIES AT SEA IN THE WAR OF 1812 Kevin D. McCranie Naval Institute Press Annapolis, Maryland Naval Institute Press 291 Wood Road CONTENTS Annapolis, MD 21402 © 20ll by Kevin D. McCranie All rights reserved. No part of this book may be reproduced or utilized in any form List of Illustrations vii or by any means, electronic or mechanical, including photocopying and recording, or by any information storage and retrieval system, without permission in writing Preface xi from the publisher. Acknowledgments xv Library of Congress Cataloging-in-Publication Data Chapter 1. "Every Appearance of Hastening the Crisis": The Royal Navy, McCranie, Kevin D. the United States Navy, and the Background to War Utmost gallantry: the U.S. and Royal Navies at sea in the War of 1812 / Kevin D. McCranie. Chapter 2. "~Little Bit of a Dust' With an English Frigate": The Opening 26 p.cm. Naval Campaign, June to September 1812 Includes bibliographical references and index. Chapter 3. "It Is a Thing I Could Not Have Expected": The Second Round, 54 ISBN 978-1-59114-504-2 (hbk. : alk. paper) - ISBN 978-1-61251-063-7 (ebook) l. September 1812-March 1813 United States-History-War of 1812-Naval operations. 2. United States. Navy­ Chapter 4. "If We Could Take One or Two of These D-d Frigates": 86 History-War of 1~12. 3. Great Britain. Royal Navy-History-War of 1812. I. Title. Reassessment of Britain's Naval Objectives, 1812-13 II. Title: U.s. and Royal Navies at sea in the War of 1812. Chapter 5. "Cast Away ... or Taken": American Naval Failure and 97 E360.M34 2011 Reassessment, June 1812-Early 1813 973· 5' 2-··dc23 Chapter 6. "Creating a Powerful Diversion": Secretary Jones and the 116 2011026325 Naval Campaign of 1813 @)This paper meets the requirements of ANSIINISO Z39.48-1992 (Permanence of Paper). Chapter J. '~ Glorious Retrieval of Our Naval Reputation": 140 The Turning Point, 1 June 1813 Printed in the United States of America. Chapter 8. "More Than Ordinary Risk": United States Frigates, Winter 1813-14 157 19 18 17 16 15 14 13 12 11 9 8 7 6 543 2 1 Chapter 9. "Pursuing My Own Course": The Essex in the Pacific, 1813-14 176 First printing Chapter lO. "Some Hard Knocks": Reassessment-The United States, 190 September 1813-March 1814 Chapter 11. "Into Abler Hands": Britain Turns to New Leadership, 1814 208 Chapter 12. "Repulsed in Every Attempt": The Culmination of the 221 Jones' Small Cruiser Strategy, mid-1814 v CHAPTER I "Every Appearance of Hastening the Crisis" 'The Royal Navy, the United States Navy, and the Background to War ess than a hundred yards separated the two ships, but darkness obscured their identities. The commander of one, Arthur Bingham, hailed across L the water, demanding the name of the other ship. He heard a voice that echoed the same question. Bingham then repeated his demand but received an identical response. On the other ship, Commodore John Rodgers stood on principle: "Having asked the first question, & of course conSidering myself entitled by the common rules of politeness to the first answer, after a pause ... I reiterated my first enquiry of 'What Ship is that'?" Both officers refused to answer as a matter of pride; the dilemma was intensified because one party did not realize the other had spoken first. At this point one side fired, and in the confused moments that followed, a del­ uge of iron spewed from both ships. Some minutes later, Rodgers again hailed, "What Ship is that?" A voice responded, "His Britannic Majesty;' but the wind swallowed the ship's name. For Rodgers, this answer was enough to discontinue the engagement. As day broke some fifty miles outside the entrance to Chesapeake Bay on 17 May 18n, the two warships remained in sight. Rodgers sent over a boat with an offi­ cer. Bingham identified himself as commander of the British sloop Little Belt, and Rodgers' officer stated that he belonged to the U.S. frigate President. When Bingham asked why the President had fired, the American officer claimed the British had fired first. Bingham railed that this "was positively not the case:' To make matters worse, 2 Chaptet· I. "Every Appearance ofHastening the Crisis" The Royal Navy, the United States Navy, and the Background to war 3 the much larger President had completely shattered the Little Belt, killing or wound­ complained, "Look at our ships, how they are manned at the breaking out of a war, ing thirty-two of her crew. Rodgers asserted that such bloodshed "would cause me and compare them with the generality of ships now commissioned, and the differ­ the most acute pain during the remainder of my life, had I not the consolation to ence will be most striking: it cannot be otherwise, on account of the vast number know that there was no alternative left me, between such a sacrifice & one which of ships at this time in commission, which are now manned by a very small pro­ would have been still greater; namely to have remained a passive spectator of insult portion of able seamen, and the remainder filled up with good, bad, and indiffer­ to the Flag of my Country, whilst it was confided to my protection:'l ent, viz. ordinary seamen, landsmen, foreigners, the sweepings of Newgate, from the "The affair of the President and Little Belt, so contested on the point of fact, but hulks, and almost all the prisons in the country:'4 which I believe was unpremeditated at least by the governments on both sides, has Naval officers also complained about the manning of their warships. In every appearance of hastening the crisis:' concluded the u.s. ambassador to Russia. 2 December 1811 one captain described his crew as "not at all what I would wish them The bloody affair was indicative of larger problems involving issues of honor and to be, or what they ought to be:' The next month, another explained that "such a misunderstandings leading up to the War of 1812. miserable Crew, I have never before, had the misfortune to command:' A third cap­ The heart of the issue was much broader and signaled that the established rules tain wrote in June 1814, "We have not a bad Ships company, thd a very weak one, as of maritime commerce had deteriorated in an international environment domi­ the last supplies of men, ... were lads much too slight for working Guns of the cali­ nated by a series of wars between Britain and France, and at times with Spain or bre, this ship is armed with:'5 with other European states. In these conflicts spanning the eighteenth century, Inadequate in quality and quantity, manning the British navy has been Britain's survival rested on financial strength, global commerce, and naval power. described as "its most intractable problem:'6 Skilled seamen took years to train, Victory generally resulted from something more, be it victories on the European and without them the wooden warships of the Royal Navy were frankly useless. continent by British and allied armies or the conquest of colonies. Britain entered Attrition suffered in two decades of warfare against Revolutionary and Napoleonic the longest, most expensive, and most unlimited of these European wars in 1793· France-and at times Spain, Denmark, and a number of other countries-meant Over the next two decades, Britain fought successive French revolutionary regimes that finding seamen for Britain's warships became ever more difficult, especially followed by Napoleon and his European allies with only a short pause resulting since the Royal Navy competed for manpower against more-attractive employment from the Peace of Amiens. Throughout the conflict, British commercial and naval opportunities in merchant ships. Volunteers for the naval service did not prove suf­ power grew relentlessly. Britain swept French merchant vessels from the sea and ficient, and the navy's leadership resorted to forcible recruitment or impressment. attempted to impose its will on neutrals, including the United States. Concurrently, Used in every war of the eighteenth century, it was extraordinarily unpopular in France obtained stunning land victories over continental challengers. However, the Britain, but the strategic imperative of keeping the Royal Navy operational provided asymmetry between French land power and British sea power meant that neither naval leaders with a justification for the questionable practice of impressment? could strike a decisive blow. Manpower deficiencies and the inability to replace human attrition contributed to a decline in the Royal Navy's strength by the time of the War of 1812. The number of ships in operational commands fell from 596 in July 1809 to 515 in July 1812, even though the navy's commitments had not declined proportionately. The 515 ships of By 1812 Britain possessed half the world's warship tonnage, an unprecedented figure July 1812 resulted in a savings of 12,070 men over what was necessary for the 596 for any state between 1500 and 1850, and its navy arguably stood at the height of its ships of 1809.8 These manpower figures were based on· authorized complements, power, having emerged victorious in all its fleet battles since 1793. In smaller actions but ships were not always manned to this leveP To keep more warships at sea, their the British navy looked nearly as impressive. In 1811 no British warship larger than authorized complements were reduced to less than optimal numbers, leading one an 18-gun sloop had struck her colors because of combat.3 Moreover, the missions contemporary to write, "The materiel and personnel were more than ever out of the Royal Navy uridertook were more expansive than any contemporary navy and their due proportions:'l0 included policing the oceans, controlling maritime trade, blockading French war­ The British navy conSistently had more ships than could be manned, but one ships, and supporting land forces.
Recommended publications
  • Memoirs of Hydrography
    MEMOIRS 07 HYDROGRAPHY INCLUDING Brief Biographies of the Principal Officers who have Served in H.M. NAVAL SURVEYING SERVICE BETWEEN THE YEARS 1750 and 1885 COMPILED BY COMMANDER L. S. DAWSON, R.N. I 1s t tw o PARTS. P a r t II.—1830 t o 1885. EASTBOURNE: HENRY W. KEAY, THE “ IMPERIAL LIBRARY.” iI i / PREF A CE. N the compilation of Part II. of the Memoirs of Hydrography, the endeavour has been to give the services of the many excellent surveying I officers of the late Indian Navy, equal prominence with those of the Royal Navy. Except in the geographical abridgment, under the heading of “ Progress of Martne Surveys” attached to the Memoirs of the various Hydrographers, the personal services of officers still on the Active List, and employed in the surveying service of the Royal Navy, have not been alluded to ; thereby the lines of official etiquette will not have been over-stepped. L. S. D. January , 1885. CONTENTS OF PART II ♦ CHAPTER I. Beaufort, Progress 1829 to 1854, Fitzroy, Belcher, Graves, Raper, Blackwood, Barrai, Arlett, Frazer, Owen Stanley, J. L. Stokes, Sulivan, Berard, Collinson, Lloyd, Otter, Kellett, La Place, Schubert, Haines,' Nolloth, Brock, Spratt, C. G. Robinson, Sheringham, Williams, Becher, Bate, Church, Powell, E. J. Bedford, Elwon, Ethersey, Carless, G. A. Bedford, James Wood, Wolfe, Balleny, Wilkes, W. Allen, Maury, Miles, Mooney, R. B. Beechey, P. Shortland, Yule, Lord, Burdwood, Dayman, Drury, Barrow, Christopher, John Wood, Harding, Kortright, Johnson, Du Petit Thouars, Lawrance, Klint, W. Smyth, Dunsterville, Cox, F. W. L. Thomas, Biddlecombe, Gordon, Bird Allen, Curtis, Edye, F.
    [Show full text]
  • Canada Archives Canada Published Heritage Direction Du Branch Patrimoine De I'edition
    North Atlantic Press Gangs: Impressment and Naval-Civilian Relations in Nova Scotia and Newfoundland, 1749-1815 by Keith Mercer Submitted in partial fulfillment of the requirements for the degree of Doctor of Philosophy at Dalhousie University Halifax, Nova Scotia August 2008 © Copyright by Keith Mercer, 2008 Library and Bibliotheque et 1*1 Archives Canada Archives Canada Published Heritage Direction du Branch Patrimoine de I'edition 395 Wellington Street 395, rue Wellington Ottawa ON K1A0N4 Ottawa ON K1A0N4 Canada Canada Your file Votre reference ISBN: 978-0-494-43931-9 Our file Notre reference ISBN: 978-0-494-43931-9 NOTICE: AVIS: The author has granted a non­ L'auteur a accorde une licence non exclusive exclusive license allowing Library permettant a la Bibliotheque et Archives and Archives Canada to reproduce, Canada de reproduire, publier, archiver, publish, archive, preserve, conserve, sauvegarder, conserver, transmettre au public communicate to the public by par telecommunication ou par Plntemet, prefer, telecommunication or on the Internet, distribuer et vendre des theses partout dans loan, distribute and sell theses le monde, a des fins commerciales ou autres, worldwide, for commercial or non­ sur support microforme, papier, electronique commercial purposes, in microform, et/ou autres formats. paper, electronic and/or any other formats. The author retains copyright L'auteur conserve la propriete du droit d'auteur ownership and moral rights in et des droits moraux qui protege cette these. this thesis. Neither the thesis Ni la these ni des extraits substantiels de nor substantial extracts from it celle-ci ne doivent etre imprimes ou autrement may be printed or otherwise reproduits sans son autorisation.
    [Show full text]
  • The Naval War of 1812, Volume 1, Index
    The Naval War of 1812: A Documentary History Volume I 1812 Part 7 of 7 Naval Historical Center Department of the Navy Washington, 1985 Electronically published by American Naval Records Society Bolton Landing, New York 2011 AS A WORK OF THE UNITED STATES FEDERAL GOVERNMENT THIS PUBLICATION IS IN THE PUBLIC DOMAIN. NOTE ON THE INDEX Index Certain aspects of the treatment of persons and vessels in this index supple­ ment annotation in the volume. Abbott, - -(Capt.). 255, 256 (Rebecca) 649·51; mentioned, 24. 25, 214. 216n, 497 , PERSONS; The Tank of military personnel is the highest rank attained by the in­ A~rdour , James (Comdr., RN). 182 (Muros) 646,651. 5ee also Croker. John W. dividual between the declaration of war, 18 June 1812, and 31 December Acasta , HM frigate: capcuta: Curlew. 216. Admiralty Courts. British: Essu case, I, 16-2 1 1812. When all references to an individual lie outside that span, the rank is 225; at La Cuaira, 64; on Nonh Amuican High Court of Admiralty: ruling in Essu the highest applicable to the person at the times to which the text refers. Station. 495; of( Nantucket. 505: chases case, 16, 17.20·21: mentioned, 25. 66. 67 Civilian masters of vessels are identified simply as "Capt." Vessels that Essu, mentioned. 485, 487 , 497 (Alexander - Lorch Commissionen of Appeals. 20·21 R. Kerr) civilians and naval personnel commanded during the period 18 June to ~H Vice Admiralty Courts: at Nassau. 17 -20: Actiw. American privat~r .schooner, 225 December 1812 are noted in parentheses at the end of the man's entry.
    [Show full text]
  • Few Americans in the 1790S Would Have Predicted That the Subject Of
    AMERICAN NAVAL POLICY IN AN AGE OF ATLANTIC WARFARE: A CONSENSUS BROKEN AND REFORGED, 1783-1816 Dissertation Presented in Partial Fulfillment of the Requirements for the Degree Doctor of Philosophy in the Graduate School of The Ohio State University By Jeffrey J. Seiken, M.A. * * * * * The Ohio State University 2007 Dissertation Committee: Approved by Professor John Guilmartin, Jr., Advisor Professor Margaret Newell _______________________ Professor Mark Grimsley Advisor History Graduate Program ABSTRACT In the 1780s, there was broad agreement among American revolutionaries like Thomas Jefferson, James Madison, and Alexander Hamilton about the need for a strong national navy. This consensus, however, collapsed as a result of the partisan strife of the 1790s. The Federalist Party embraced the strategic rationale laid out by naval boosters in the previous decade, namely that only a powerful, seagoing battle fleet offered a viable means of defending the nation's vulnerable ports and harbors. Federalists also believed a navy was necessary to protect America's burgeoning trade with overseas markets. Republicans did not dispute the desirability of the Federalist goals, but they disagreed sharply with their political opponents about the wisdom of depending on a navy to achieve these ends. In place of a navy, the Republicans with Jefferson and Madison at the lead championed an altogether different prescription for national security and commercial growth: economic coercion. The Federalists won most of the legislative confrontations of the 1790s. But their very success contributed to the party's decisive defeat in the election of 1800 and the abandonment of their plans to create a strong blue water navy.
    [Show full text]
  • Bedhampton and Havant and the Royal Navy
    Bedhampton, Havant and the Royal Navy (and the Lost Admirals of Leigh ) Vice-Admiral Sir Charles Bullen, Sir John Theophilus Lee, circa 1840. 1769-1853. English School. National Maritime Museum, London. Steve Jones 023 9247 3326 March 2017 £6 The Ça Ira being attacked by the Agamemnon and Inconstant, 13 March 1795. Havant History Booklet No. 54 View, comment, and order all booklets at: hhbkt.com Edited by Ralph Cousins 2 Bedhampton, Havant and the Royal Navy (and the Lost Admirals of Leigh Park) Steve Jones Havant, a small coastal town in its own right, has always had close connections with the navy, and its larger neighbour Portsmouth, the home of the Senior Service. From supplying Portsmouth and the navy with cider in the 17th and early 18th centuries through to being the home of several naval establishments during the Second World War, Havant has always played its part in supporting the navy. Even today Portsmouth dockyard, though not with the volume it once was, is a leading employer to the people of the Havant area. With local hi-tec firms such as Lockheed Martin Havant still plays its part in supporting the navy. Because of its close proximity to Portsmouth it is not surprising that many a naval officer chose Havant and its neighbourhood for their homes. Men of the calibre of Admiral Sir John Acworth Ommaney of Warblington House, Emsworth Road, Admiral Sir James Stirling of Belmont Park, Bedhampton, and Vice-Admiral Charles Norcock of Sherwood, East Street, have all at one time chosen to live in Havant.
    [Show full text]
  • John J. Ford, Jr. Collection of Coins, Medals and Currency, Part 5
    AUCTION RESULTS* OHN J. FORD, Jr. COLLECTION COINS, MEDALS AND CURRENCY Part V NUMISMATIC AMERICAN HISTORY Early American Coins and Tokens: Voce Populi, Auctori Plebis, Nova Constellatio and Massachusetts Coppers United States Medals: Naval, Historical and Diplomatic Medals OCTOBER 12, 2004 123 West 57th Street • New York, NY PUBLIC AUCTION SALE LOT # PRICE LOT # PRICE LOT # PRICE LOT # PRICE 1 2600.00 60 3000.00 119 975.00 178 17000.00 2 2400.00 61 6750.00 120 5250.00 179 1700.00 3 1300.00 62 1100.00 121 2000.00 180 600.00 4 1700.00 63 425.00 122 13000.00 181 675.00 5 5000.00 64 3000.00 123 950.00 182 525.00 6 1500.00 65 425.00 124 1600.00 183 850.00 7 500.00 66 500.00 125 1300.00 184 525.00 8 1300.00 67 1600.00 126 4750.00 185 425.00 9 400.00 68 6250.00 127 1700.00 186 900.00 10 950.00 69 6250.00 128 950.00 187 1700.00 11 600.00 70 1100.00 129 1200.00 188 325.00 12 450.00 71 4750.00 130 600.00 189 500.00 13 475.00 72 12000.00 131 8500.00 190 850.00 14 100.00 73 5000.00 132 2200.00 191 600.00 15 1200.00 74 2600.00 133 600.00 192 17000.00 16 180.00 75 2200.00 134 2200.00 193 47500.00 17 450.00 76 1200.00 135 3000.00 194 9500.00 18 325.00 77 350.00 136 2000.00 195 6000.00 19 200.00 78 3250.00 137 1600.00 196 14000.00 20 725.00 79 1700.00 138 900.00 197 9500.00 21 850.00 80 5000.00 139 1200.00 198 4750.00 22 2400.00 81 4000.00 140 750.00 199 5500.00 23 675.00 82 35000.00 141 5750.00 200 6500.00 24 2800.00 83 28000.00 142 4500.00 201 6000.00 25 375.00 84 5750.00 143 775.00 202 32500.00 26 2800.00 85 260000.00 144 4250.00 203 5500.00 27 1500.00
    [Show full text]
  • The Naval War of 1812: a Documentary History
    The Naval War of 1812: A Documentary History Volume I 1812 Part 1 of 7 Naval Historical Center Department of the Navy Washington, 1985 Electronically published by American Naval Records Society Bolton Landing, New York 2011 AS A WORK OF THE UNITED STATES FEDERAL GOVERNMENT THIS PUBLICATION IS IN THE PUBLIC DOMAIN. THE NAVAL WAR OF 1812 d~ ~ Volume I 1812 WILLIAM S. DUDLEY Editor MICHAEL J. CRAWFORD Associate Editor With a Foreword by REAR ADMIRAL JOHN D. H. KANE. JR .. USN (RET.) Director of the Naval Historical Cemer NAVAL HISTORICAL CENTER DEPARTMENT OF THE NAVY WASHINGTON: 1985 CHIEF OF NAVAL OPERATIONS DEDICATION This book is the first of a three-volume series of naval documents from the War of 1812. The purpose of this series is to publish rare, inaccessible and deteriorating documents for the enlightme nt oCall who wish to study the origins of American sea power. SECRETARY OF THE NAVY'S ADVISORY The importance of the War of 1812 extends to our time. The image of a COMMITTEE ON NAVAL HIST ORY dimi nutive United States Navy confronting the British maritime giant is one that has passed from generation to generation. The fact is that the Arthur D. Baker, III Richard Leopold British Navy, while very large, had world-wide responsibilities. During the J ames A. Field Augustus P. Loring firs t year of the war, which this volume presents, the number and size of British warships on the North American Station did not overpower vastly Joy Bright Hancock Jon E. Mandaville the force available to the U.
    [Show full text]
  • The Murder of Lieutenant Lawry:: a Case Study of British Naval Impressment in Newfoundland, 1794
    Document généré le 30 sept. 2021 00:55 Newfoundland Studies The Murder of Lieutenant Lawry: A Case Study of British Naval Impressment in Newfoundland, 1794 Keith Mercer Volume 21, numéro 2, autumn 2006 URI : https://id.erudit.org/iderudit/nflds21_2art04 Aller au sommaire du numéro Éditeur(s) Faculty of Arts, Memorial University ISSN 0823-1737 (imprimé) 1715-1430 (numérique) Découvrir la revue Citer cet article Mercer, K. (2006). The Murder of Lieutenant Lawry:: A Case Study of British Naval Impressment in Newfoundland, 1794. Newfoundland Studies, 21(2), 255–289. All rights reserved © Memorial University, 2006 Ce document est protégé par la loi sur le droit d’auteur. L’utilisation des services d’Érudit (y compris la reproduction) est assujettie à sa politique d’utilisation que vous pouvez consulter en ligne. https://apropos.erudit.org/fr/usagers/politique-dutilisation/ Cet article est diffusé et préservé par Érudit. Érudit est un consortium interuniversitaire sans but lucratif composé de l’Université de Montréal, l’Université Laval et l’Université du Québec à Montréal. Il a pour mission la promotion et la valorisation de la recherche. https://www.erudit.org/fr/ The Murder of Lieutenant Lawry: A Case Study of British Naval Impressment in Newfoundland, 1794 KEITH MERCER ON 10 MARCH 1794, HMS Boston was anchored at Portsmouth, the Royal Navy’s main base in southern England, getting ready for its Atlantic voyage to Newfoundland. Sit- ting astern in his cabin was Captain J.N. Morris, writing an urgent letter to Philip Stephens, Secretary of the Admiralty. Scheduled to sail the following week, Morris requested a quick officer exchange: Lieutenant John Edwards of the Boston in return for Richard Lawry of HMS Comet.
    [Show full text]
  • The Making of a Maritime Explorer: James Cook in Newfoundland, 1762-1767
    THE MAKING OF A MARITIME EXPLORER: JAMES COOK IN NEWFOUNDLAND, 1762-1767 In introducing his book, Captain Cook’s War and Peace: The Royal Navy Years, 1755-1768, John Robson remarked that “Some writers have asked the question, ‘Why was James Cook chosen to lead the Endeavour expedition [into the Pacific in 1768]?’” Robson then suggested that, with a better understanding of Cook’s career between 1755 and 1768, the more reasonable questions to ask would be “‘Why would the Admiralty have chosen anyone else to lead the expedition?’ and ‘Who else could they have chosen?’.”1 Robson’s point is that Cook’s career in the Pacific (which for much of the rest of the world is the only James Cook there is) cannot be understood without reference to his accomplishments during the years that he served in the Royal Navy in North America. Those years were abso- lutely critical to his training as a navigator, a cartographer, and as a com- mander. Indeed, in his biography of Cook, Frank McLynn declares quite unambiguously that “Even without the Pacific, Cook would have been a great historical figure.”2 It is a conclusion accepted by those who have studied the man carefully, but it is a conclusion which has difficulty captur- ing public recognition outside of Atlantic Canada.3 Cook had volunteered into the Royal Navy in 1755 while in his twenties, with the rating of Able Seaman, thanks to several years’ seafar- ing experience in commercial service, first in the North Sea coal trade and 1John Robson, Captain Cook's War & Peace: The Royal Navy Years 1755-1768 (Annapolis, MD: Naval Institute Press; Barnsley, South Yorks.: Seaforth Publishing; Sydney: University of New South Wales Press, 2009), p.
    [Show full text]
  • University Microfilms International 300 N
    INFORMATION TO USERS This was produced from a copy of a document sent to us for microfilming. Wliile the most advanced technological means to photograph and reproduce this document have been used, the quality is heavily dependent upon the quality of the material submitted. The following explanation of techniques is provided to help you understand markings or notations which may appear on this reproduction. 1. The sign or “target” for pages apparently lacking from the document photographed is “Missing Page(s)”. If it was possible to obtain the missing page(s) or section, they are spliced into the film along with adjacent pages. This may have necessitated cutting through an image and duplicating adjacent pages to assure you of complete continuity. 2. When an image on the film is obliterated with a round black mark it is an indication that the film inspector noticed either blurred copy because of movement during exposure, or duplicate copy. Unless we meant to delete copyrighted materials that should not have been filmed, you will find a good image of the page in the adjacent frame. 3. When a map, drawing or chart, etc., is part of the material being photo­ graphed the photographer has followed a definite method in “sectioning” the material. It is customary to begin filming at the upper left hand corner of a large sheet and to continue from left to right in equal sections with small overlaps. If necessary, sectioning is continued again—beginning below the first row and continuing on until complete. 4. For any illustrations that cannot be reproduced satisfactorily by xerography, photographic prints can be purchased at additional cost and tipped into your xerographic copy.
    [Show full text]
  • Meaghan Walker
    Mobilising Clothes at Sea: Naval Dress Culture and Economy during the French Wars, 1793-1815 by Meaghan Walker A thesis submitted in partial fulfillment of the requirements for the degree of Doctor of Philosophy in History Department of History and Classics University of Alberta © Meaghan Walker, 2020 ii Abstract During the British involvement in the French Revolutionary and Napoleonic Wars, 1793- 1815, the Royal Navy contracted for, inspected, and distributed clothing to naval warships in British ports and abroad. This dissertation examines the Admiralty in-letters stored at the British National Archives, Kew, and the Caird Library, at the National Maritime Museum, Greenwich, to understand how this system worked both practically as a system of production and distribution, but also rhetorically, as an important aspect of the power between administrators, commanders and crew. The Royal Navy concurrently provided clothing on three different models. Officers wore loosely regulated uniforms that they personally paid for and sourced. Sailors wore slop clothes, mass-produced clothing purchased from private contractors in bulk. Finally, the marines were dressed in a combination of the two. They wore slops when they performed seafaring labour and during leisure time but wore more strictly regulated uniforms that were reminiscent of those from the army when policing sailors. Naval commanders both interfered with the uniforms of the marines, whose red coats visually challenged naval authority, and advocated for sailors’ slop clothing to solidify their own paternal mastery of their vessels. The navy was a large bureaucratic and technological body beyond its primary military function, and clothing reveals how much time commanders spent on tedious paperwork and supply issues between moments of heightened military action.
    [Show full text]
  • The Making of a Maritime Explorer: James Cook in Newfoundland, 1762-1767 Olaf Uwe Janzen
    The Making of a Maritime Explorer: James Cook in Newfoundland, 1762-1767 Olaf Uwe Janzen La cartographie de Terre-Neuve effectuée par James Cook de 1762 à 1767 a été indispensable à ses futures expéditions dans le Pacifique. Ses efforts lui ont valu la réputation de maître navigateur et arpenteur fort qualifié pour le commandement. Certains historiens ont examiné si le commandement de l’exploration du Pacifique aurait pu être confié à quelqu’un d’autre. Bien que cette conclusion soit acceptée par ceux qui ont méticuleusement étudié le capitaine Cook, il s’agit d’une conclusion qui est difficilement reconnue publiquement à l’extérieur du Canada atlantique. In introducing his book, Captain Cook’s War and Peace: The Royal Navy Years, 1755-1768, John Robson remarked that “Some writers have asked the question, ‘Why was James Cook chosen to lead the Endeavour expedition [into the Pacific in 1768]?’” Robson then suggested that, with a better understanding of Cook’s career between 1755 and 1768, the more reasonable questions to ask would be “‘Why would the Admiralty have chosen anyone else to lead the expedition?’ and ‘Who else could they have chosen?’”1 Robson’s point is that Cook’s career in the Pacific (which for much of the rest of the world is the only James Cook there is) cannot be understood without reference to his accomplishments during the years that he served in the Royal Navy in North America. Those years were absolutely critical to his training as a navigator, a hydrographer, and as a commander.2 Indeed, in his biography of Cook, Frank McLynn declares quite unambiguously that “Even 1 John Robson, Captain Cook’s War & Peace: The Royal Navy Years 1755-1768 (Annapolis, MD: Naval Institute Press; Barnsley, South Yorks.: Seaforth Publishing; Sydney: University of New South Wales Press, 2009), 4.
    [Show full text]