DOCSLIB.ORG

Mechanisms Affecting Predation Success in Wolf Spiders

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Mechanisms Affecting Predation Success in Wolf Spiders MECHANISMS AFFECTING PREDATION SUCCESS IN WOLF SPIDERS by MATTHEW M. STEFFENSON Presented to the Faculty of the Graduate School of The University of Texas at Arlington in Partial Fulfillment of the Requirements for the Degree of DOCTOR OF PHILOSOPHY THE UNIVERSITY OF TEXAS AT ARLINGTON August 2014 Copyright © by Matthew M. Steffenson 2014 All Rights Reserved ii Acknowledgements I’ve often heard it said that, “nothing worth doing is ever easy”. This project was definitely not the exception. I fully believe that completing a graduate degree is a community effort, because the trial of graduate school tests both yourself, as well as those surrounding you. Over the past five years, I have poured my blood, sweat, and tears into this dissertation, and only with the support of an amazing group of mentors, colleagues, friends, and family has it finally reached its culmination. Without further due, here are the people that without which, my dream of teaching college biology would never have happened. I would like to start off thanking my fellow students. The many friends that I have made here at UTA have made the test of graduate school bearable. We have laughed, cried, procrastinated, celebrated, despaired, and ultimately grown together. Oh, and also complained…lots of that. Hey! It’s a graduate student’s right! I thank the following people for their tremendous support and friendship: Matt Moseley (worst officemate EVER), Michelle Green (who will never convert me to veganism), Liz McGinty (crazy cat lady), Whitney Mann (aka Gator, aka replacement crazy cat lady), Corey Roelke (worst distraction EVER), Humera Shaikh (aka brown squirrel), James Pharr (worst card player EVER), Brian Fontenot (grade A shady-looking dude), and Josh Beach-Letendre (tardigrade of UTA). There are two graduate students in particular I would like to thank. Thank you, Christian Cox, for constantly badgering me to experiment, question, write, and present. Without your continuous pressure to strive to be a better graduate student, I would most likely not have gotten where I am today. Also, I still think you’re wrong about the p-value argument…long story. And Jayme Walton, thank you for becoming my closest friend. Without the long drawn out conversations about what is scarier to be attacked by (a iii pterodactyl or a moose?), and the barrage of goofy, sometime nonsensical emails, I would have gone completely crazy. I also thank my committee members, Daniel Formanowicz, James Robinson, Eric Smith, Laura Gough, Chris Brown, and Laura Mydlarz. Special thanks go to Chris Brown. Over the past seven years, he has continued to help guide my career, and was the first person to give me a chance in graduate school. He opened a door that led me to teaching biology at the college level, something I can never thank him enough for. My advisor, Laura Mydlarz also deserves very special thanks. She took me into her lab and has provided me with steadfast direction that has never steered me wrong. Thank you volunteering to adopt me as a student; and in doing so made me learn to go outside my ecology comfort zone. Biochemical assays for the win! I could not have asked for a more phenomenal advisor. I also would also like to thank my family, primarily my parents, Elizabeth and Michael Steffenson. They have always been there for me and encouraged me to follow my dreams. Lastly, I thank my beautiful fiancé, Jen Duncan. The process of finishing my dissertation has been one of the most exhausting and trying periods of my life. And…I would do it all over again just because it allowed me to find you. Some people are worth melting for. Ha! I told you I’d work that in somewhere! Funding for this research was supplied by the American Arachnological Society, the American Museum of Natural History, the University of Texas at Arlington Chapter of the Phi Sigma Society, and the Department of Biology at the University of Texas at Arlington. June 30, 2014 iv Abstract MECHANISMS AFFECTING PREDATION SUCCESS IN WOLF SPIDERS Matthew M. Steffenson, PhD The University of Texas at Arlington, 2014 Supervising Professor: Laura D. Mydlarz Predator-prey interactions play a role in community structure through a variety of different mechanisms including direct consumption, density-mediated indirect effects, and trait-mediated indirect effects. Understanding factors that can influence the efficacy of direct consumption on prey populations can help us to identify the strength of the impact predators can have on lower trophic levels. My dissertation research focuses on how mechanisms like sexual dimorphism, impaired body condition, and starvation stress alter how effective an intermediate predator (i.e. a predator that occupies an intermediate position in the food web) can be in direct consumption of prey. Using wolf spiders as my model, and a combination of laboratory experimental foraging trials and field experiment approaches, I assessed the effectiveness of spiders as predators. My main questions were how sexual dimorphism and limb autotomy affect predatory behaviors in wolf spiders. I also examined the effect of starvation on fitness and immunological trade-offs using biochemical immune assays This research reveals that female wolf spiders are more effective at direct consumption of prey than males due to a combination of body size, trophic morphology, and behavioral dimorphisms. Limb autotomy had no significant effect on foraging success in wolf spiders, although there was a trend of leg autotomy having a negative impact on prey capture ability. Lastly, starvation of spiders leads to an energetic trade-off where individuals appear to sacrifice physiological condition for v investment into immune defense. Findings from this dissertation can be utilized to help further our understanding of how predator-prey interactions shape community structure. vi Table of Contents Acknowledgements .............................................................................................................iii Abstract ............................................................................................................................... v List of Illustrations .............................................................................................................. ix List of Tables ....................................................................................................................... x Chapter 1 Introduction......................................................................................................... 1 1.1 Introduction to Predator-Prey Interactions ................................................................ 1 1.2 Predation Sequence ................................................................................................. 3 1.3 Spiders Role in the Community ................................................................................ 4 1.4 Dissertation Goals .................................................................................................... 7 Chapter 2 Sexual Dimorphic Characters and Their Impact on Predator-prey Interactions .......................................................................................................................... 9 2.1 Introduction ............................................................................................................... 9 2.2 Methods .................................................................................................................. 11 2.2.1 Foraging Trial Design ...................................................................................... 12 2.2.2 Morphological Data Collection ......................................................................... 13 2.2.3 Behavioral Data Collection .............................................................................. 14 2.2.4 Statistical Analysis ........................................................................................... 16 2.3 Results .................................................................................................................... 17 2.4 Discussion .............................................................................................................. 27 Chapter 3 Autotomy and its Effects on Wolf Spider Foraging Success ............................ 31 3.1 Introduction ............................................................................................................. 31 3.2 Methods .................................................................................................................. 33 3.2.1 Study Area and Specimen Collection .............................................................. 33 3.2.2 Experimental Trials .......................................................................................... 34 vii 3.2.3 Statistical Analysis ........................................................................................... 37 3.3 Results .................................................................................................................... 37 3.4 Discussion .............................................................................................................. 42 Chapter 4 The Effect of Food Constraints on Wolf Spider (Tigrosa helluo ) Fitness ............................................................................................................................... 48 4.1 Introduction ............................................................................................................. 48 4.2 Methods .................................................................................................................
Load more

Recommended publications
  • 22 3 259 263 Mikhailov Alopecosa.P65
    Arthropoda Selecta 22(3): 259263 © ARTHROPODA SELECTA, 2013 Tarentula Sundevall, 1833 and Alopecosa Simon, 1885: a historical account (Aranei: Lycosidae) Tarentula Sundevall, 1833 è Alopecosa Simon, 1885: èñòîðè÷åñêèé îáçîð (Aranei: Lycosidae) K.G. Mikhailov Ê.Ã. Ìèõàéëîâ Zoological Museum MGU, Bolshaya Nikitskaya Str. 6, Moscow 125009 Russia. Çîîëîãè÷åñêèé ìóçåé ÌÃÓ, óë. Áîëüøàÿ Íèêèòñêàÿ, 6, Ìîñêâà 125009 Ðîññèÿ. KEY WORDS: Tarentula, Alopecosa, nomenclature, synonymy, spiders, Lycosidae. ÊËÞ×ÅÂÛÅ ÑËÎÂÀ: Tarentula, Alopecosa, íîìåíêëàòóðà, ñèíîíèìèÿ, ïàóêè, Lycosidae. ABSTRACT. History of Tarentula Sundevall, 1833 genus Lycosa to include the following 11 species (the and Alopecosa Simon, 1885 is reviewed. Validity of current species assignments follow the catalogues by Alopecosa Simon, 1885 is supported. Reimoser [1919], Roewer [1954a], and, especially, Bonnet [1955, 1957, 1959]): ÐÅÇÞÌÅ. Äàí îáçîð èñòîðèè ðîäîâûõ íàçâà- Lycosa Fabrilis [= Alopecosa fabrilis (Clerck, 1758)], íèé Tarentula Sundevall, 1833 è Alopecosa Simon, L. trabalis [= Alopecosa inquilina (Clerck, 1758), male, 1885. Îáîñíîâàíà âàëèäíîñòü íàçâàíèÿ Alopecosa and A. trabalis (Clerck, 1758), female], Simon, 1885. L. vorax?, male [= either Alopecosa trabalis or A. trabalis and A. pulverulenta (Clerck, 1758), according Introduction to different sources], L. nivalis male [= Alopecosa aculeata (Clerck, 1758)], The nomenclatorial problems concerning the ge- L. barbipes [sp.n.] [= Alopecosa barbipes Sundevall, neric names Tarantula Fabricius, 1793, Tarentula Sun- 1833, = A. accentuata (Latreille, 1817)], devall, 1833 and Alopecosa Simon, 1885 have been L. cruciata female [sp.n.] [= Alopecosa barbipes Sun- discussed in the arachnological literature at least twice devall, 1833, = A. accentuata (Latreille, 1817)], [Charitonov, 1931; Bonnet, 1951]. However, the arach- L. pulverulenta [= Alopecosa pulverulenta], nological community seems to have overlooked or ne- L.
    [Show full text]
  • Introduction to Arthropod Groups What Is Entomology?
    Entomology 340 Introduction to Arthropod Groups What is Entomology? The study of insects (and their near relatives). Species Diversity PLANTS INSECTS OTHER ANIMALS OTHER ARTHROPODS How many kinds of insects are there in the world? • 1,000,0001,000,000 speciesspecies knownknown Possibly 3,000,000 unidentified species Insects & Relatives 100,000 species in N America 1,000 in a typical backyard Mostly beneficial or harmless Pollination Food for birds and fish Produce honey, wax, shellac, silk Less than 3% are pests Destroy food crops, ornamentals Attack humans and pets Transmit disease Classification of Japanese Beetle Kingdom Animalia Phylum Arthropoda Class Insecta Order Coleoptera Family Scarabaeidae Genus Popillia Species japonica Arthropoda (jointed foot) Arachnida -Spiders, Ticks, Mites, Scorpions Xiphosura -Horseshoe crabs Crustacea -Sowbugs, Pillbugs, Crabs, Shrimp Diplopoda - Millipedes Chilopoda - Centipedes Symphyla - Symphylans Insecta - Insects Shared Characteristics of Phylum Arthropoda - Segmented bodies are arranged into regions, called tagmata (in insects = head, thorax, abdomen). - Paired appendages (e.g., legs, antennae) are jointed. - Posess chitinous exoskeletion that must be shed during growth. - Have bilateral symmetry. - Nervous system is ventral (belly) and the circulatory system is open and dorsal (back). Arthropod Groups Mouthpart characteristics are divided arthropods into two large groups •Chelicerates (Scissors-like) •Mandibulates (Pliers-like) Arthropod Groups Chelicerate Arachnida -Spiders,
    [Show full text]
  • Reflections on the Tapetum Lucidum and Eyeshine in Lycosoid Spiders
    2013. The Journal of Arachnology 41:43–52 Reflections on the tapetum lucidum and eyeshine in lycosoid spiders Kari Benson: School of Sciences, Lynchburg College, 1501 Lakeside Dr., Lynchburg, Virginia 24501, USA. E-mail: [email protected] Robert B. Suter: Department of Biology, Vassar College, 124 Raymond Avenue, Poughkeepsie, New York 12603, USA Abstract. In the lycosoid spiders, the secondary eyes possess a grate-shaped tapetum lucidum that reflects light, causing eyeshine when these spiders are viewed with approximately coaxial illumination. This guanine-based reflective surface is thought to increase visual capabilities in low light. We explored the eyeshine of the posterior medial eye in eight taxa of pisaurid and lycosid spiders. The taxa included four pisaurids: Dolomedes tenebrosus Hentz 1844, D. triton (Walckenaer 1837), D. scriptus Hentz 1845 and D. vittatus Walckenaer 1837; and four lycosids: Gladicosa pulchra (Keyserling 1877), Hogna sp. (cf. Lycosa lenta (Hentz 1844) sensu Wallace 1942), Rabidosa punctulata (Hentz 1844) and Varacosa avara (Keyserling 1877). We found that there were significant family- and species-level differences in both the reflected spectra and the intensity of reflection. Although the peaks of the reflected spectra were in the green range for all spiders, the mean peak was further toward the blue end of the spectrum for the lycosids than for the pisaurids. Variation among species (about 54% of the total variation) was dominated by G. pulchra (Lycosidae) and D. vittatus (Pisauridae), both of whose spectra peaked near yellow, vs. V. avara (Lycosidae), whose spectra peaked to the blue side of green. The lycosid spiders showed overall brighter eyeshine.
    [Show full text]
  • A Protocol for Online Documentation of Spider Biodiversity Inventories Applied to a Mexican Tropical Wet Forest (Araneae, Araneomorphae)
    Zootaxa 4722 (3): 241–269 ISSN 1175-5326 (print edition) https://www.mapress.com/j/zt/ Article ZOOTAXA Copyright © 2020 Magnolia Press ISSN 1175-5334 (online edition) https://doi.org/10.11646/zootaxa.4722.3.2 http://zoobank.org/urn:lsid:zoobank.org:pub:6AC6E70B-6E6A-4D46-9C8A-2260B929E471 A protocol for online documentation of spider biodiversity inventories applied to a Mexican tropical wet forest (Araneae, Araneomorphae) FERNANDO ÁLVAREZ-PADILLA1, 2, M. ANTONIO GALÁN-SÁNCHEZ1 & F. JAVIER SALGUEIRO- SEPÚLVEDA1 1Laboratorio de Aracnología, Facultad de Ciencias, Departamento de Biología Comparada, Universidad Nacional Autónoma de México, Circuito Exterior s/n, Colonia Copilco el Bajo. C. P. 04510. Del. Coyoacán, Ciudad de México, México. E-mail: [email protected] 2Corresponding author Abstract Spider community inventories have relatively well-established standardized collecting protocols. Such protocols set rules for the orderly acquisition of samples to estimate community parameters and to establish comparisons between areas. These methods have been tested worldwide, providing useful data for inventory planning and optimal sampling allocation efforts. The taxonomic counterpart of biodiversity inventories has received considerably less attention. Species lists and their relative abundances are the only link between the community parameters resulting from a biotic inventory and the biology of the species that live there. However, this connection is lost or speculative at best for species only partially identified (e. g., to genus but not to species). This link is particularly important for diverse tropical regions were many taxa are undescribed or little known such as spiders. One approach to this problem has been the development of biodiversity inventory websites that document the morphology of the species with digital images organized as standard views.
    [Show full text]
  • Effects of Chronic Exposure to the Herbicide, Mesotrione, on Spiders
    Susquehanna University Scholarly Commons Senior Scholars Day Apr 28th, 12:00 AM - 12:00 AM Effects of Chronic Exposure to the Herbicide, Mesotrione, on Spiders Maya Khanna Susquehanna University Joseph Evans Susquehanna University Matthew Persons Susquehanna University Follow this and additional works at: https://scholarlycommons.susqu.edu/ssd Khanna, Maya; Evans, Joseph; and Persons, Matthew, "Effects of Chronic Exposure to the Herbicide, Mesotrione, on Spiders" (2020). Senior Scholars Day. 34. https://scholarlycommons.susqu.edu/ssd/2020/posters/34 This Event is brought to you for free and open access by Scholarly Commons. It has been accepted for inclusion in Senior Scholars Day by an authorized administrator of Scholarly Commons. For more information, please contact [email protected]. Effects of Chronic Exposure to the Herbicide, Mesotrione on Spiders Maya Khanna, Joseph Evans, and Matthew Persons Department of Biology, Susquehanna University, PA 17870 Tigrosa helluo Trochosa ruricola Mecaphesa asperata Frontinella pyramitela Tetragnatha laboriosa Hogna lenta Pisaurina mira Abstract Methods All spiders were collected on Table 1. The predicted lethality of mesotrione on each spider species based upon soil association levels and species size. Toxicity is predicted to increase with smaller size and Mesotrione is a widely used agricultural herbicide and is frequently used alone or as an adjuvant for the Susquehanna University’s campus. Each spider was housed in a 473 ml (16oz) greater soil contact. Sample sizes for each species are indicated to the left. A total of 615 herbicides glyphosate and atrazine. The effects of mesotrione are largely untested on beneficial non-target spiders were used in this study. species such as spiders.
    [Show full text]
  • Tarantulas and Social Spiders
    Tarantulas and Social Spiders: A Tale of Sex and Silk by Jonathan Bull BSc (Hons) MSc ICL Thesis Presented to the Institute of Biology of The University of Nottingham in Partial Fulfilment of the Requirements for the Degree of Doctor of Philosophy The University of Nottingham May 2012 DEDICATION To my parents… …because they both said to dedicate it to the other… I dedicate it to both ii ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS First and foremost I would like to thank my supervisor Dr Sara Goodacre for her guidance and support. I am also hugely endebted to Dr Keith Spriggs who became my mentor in the field of RNA and without whom my understanding of the field would have been but a fraction of what it is now. Particular thanks go to Professor John Brookfield, an expert in the field of biological statistics and data retrieval. Likewise with Dr Susan Liddell for her proteomics assistance, a truly remarkable individual on par with Professor Brookfield in being able to simplify even the most complex techniques and analyses. Finally, I would really like to thank Janet Beccaloni for her time and resources at the Natural History Museum, London, permitting me access to the collections therein; ten years on and still a delight. Finally, amongst the greats, Alexander ‘Sasha’ Kondrashov… a true inspiration. I would also like to express my gratitude to those who, although may not have directly contributed, should not be forgotten due to their continued assistance and considerate nature: Dr Chris Wade (five straight hours of help was not uncommon!), Sue Buxton (direct to my bench creepy crawlies), Sheila Keeble (ventures and cleans where others dare not), Alice Young (read/checked my thesis and overcame her arachnophobia!) and all those in the Centre for Biomolecular Sciences.
    [Show full text]
  • Predation on Reproducing Wolf Spiders: Access to Information Has Differential Effects on Male and Female Survival
    Animal Behaviour 128 (2017) 165e173 Contents lists available at ScienceDirect Animal Behaviour journal homepage: www.elsevier.com/locate/anbehav Predation on reproducing wolf spiders: access to information has differential effects on male and female survival * Ann L. Rypstra a, , Chad D. Hoefler b, 1, Matthew H. Persons c, 2 a Department of Biology, Miami University, Hamilton, OH, U.S.A. b Department of Biology, Arcadia University, Glenside, PA, U.S.A. c Department of Biology, Susquehanna University, Selinsgrove, PA, U.S.A. article info Predation has widespread influences on animal behaviour, and reproductive activities can be particularly Article history: dangerous. Males and females differ in their reactions to sensory stimuli from predators and potential Received 13 September 2016 mates, which affects the risk experienced by each sex. Thus, the information available can cause dif- Initial acceptance 8 November 2016 ferential survival and have profound implications for mating opportunities and population structure. The Final acceptance 24 March 2017 wolf spider, Pardosa milvina, detects and responds in a risk-sensitive manner to chemotactile information from a larger predator, the wolf spider Tigrosa helluo. Male P. milvina use similar chemotactile cues to find MS. number: A16-00806R2 females whereas female P. milvina focus on the visual, and perhaps vibratory, aspects of the male display. Our aim was to document the risk posed by T. helluo predators on P. milvina during reproduction and to Keywords: determine whether augmenting chemotactile information would affect that outcome. In the laboratory, chemical cue we explored the effects of adding predator and/or female cues on the predatory success of T.
    [Show full text]
  • Common Kansas Spiders
    A Pocket Guide to Common Kansas Spiders By Hank Guarisco Photos by Hank Guarisco Funded by Westar Energy Green Team, American Arachnological Society and the Chickadee Checkoff Published by the Friends of the Great Plains Nature Center i Table of Contents Introduction • 2 Arachnophobia • 3 Spider Anatomy • 4 House Spiders • 5 Hunting Spiders • 5 Venomous Spiders • 6-7 Spider Webs • 8-9 Other Arachnids • 9-12 Species accounts • 13 Texas Brown Tarantula • 14 Brown Recluse • 15 Northern Black Widow • 16 Southern & Western Black Widows • 17-18 Woodlouse Spider • 19 Truncated Cellar Spider • 20 Elongated Cellar Spider • 21 Common Cellar Spider • 22 Checkered Cobweb Weaver • 23 Quasi-social Cobweb Spider • 24 Carolina Wolf Spider • 25 Striped Wolf Spider • 26 Dotted Wolf Spider • 27 Western Lance Spider • 28 Common Nurseryweb Spider • 29 Tufted Nurseryweb Spider • 30 Giant Fishing Spider • 31 Six-spotted Fishing Spider • 32 Garden Ghost Spider Cover Photo: Cherokee Star-bellied Orbweaver ii Eastern Funnelweb Spider • 33 Eastern and Western Parson Spiders • 34 Garden Ghost Spider • 35 Bark Crab Spider • 36 Prairie Crab Spider • 37 Texas Crab Spider • 38 Black-banded Crab Spider • 39 Ridge-faced Flower Spider • 40 Striped Lynx Spider • 41 Black-banded Common and Convict Zebra Spiders • 42 Crab Spider Dimorphic Jumping Spider • 43 Bold Jumping Spider • 44 Apache Jumping Spider • 45 Prairie Jumping Spider • 46 Emerald Jumping Spider • 47 Bark Jumping Spider • 48 Puritan Pirate Spider • 49 Eastern and Four-lined Pirate Spiders • 50 Orchard Spider • 51 Castleback Orbweaver • 52 Triangulate Orbweaver • 53 Common & Cherokee Star-bellied Orbweavers • 54 Black & Yellow Garden Spider • 55 Banded Garden Spider • 56 Marbled Orbweaver • 57 Eastern Arboreal Orbweaver • 58 Western Arboreal Orbweaver • 59 Furrow Orbweaver • 60 Eastern Labyrinth Orbweaver • 61 Giant Long-jawed Orbweaver • 62 Silver Long-jawed Orbweaver • 63 Bowl and Doily Spider • 64 Filmy Dome Spider • 66 References • 67 Pocket Guides • 68-69 1 Introduction This is a guide to the most common spiders found in Kansas.
    [Show full text]
  • 2016 Persons Mercury Content Spiders
    Variation in total mercury content among riparian and non-riparian spider species Hailey Shannon, Derek Wilson, Tara Barbarich, Brian Mangan*, and Matthew Persons Dept. of Biology, Susquehanna University, Selinsgrove, PA 17870 *Dept. of Biology, King’s College, Wilkes-Barre, PA 18711 ABSTRACT Spiders collected and Mercury is a persistent environmental contaminant that primarily originates from coal-fired Spiders prepared power plants but may arise from other sources including uncontrolled mine fires. Variation in Collected spiders were rinsed total mercury uptake and mobilization through the apex arthropod community is poorly identified (N = 672) with water for at least 10 understood. We measured total mercury among ground and web-building spiders at sites along the Susquehanna River near a coal-fired power plant and compared total mercury levels seconds and placed in small to spiders from uncontrolled coal fire burn sites (Centralia, PA and Laurel Run, PA) and Spiders were labeled containers. Spiders reference sites away from the river or point sources of mercury pollution (agricultural fields collected from 6 sites were kept frozen until and headwater streams). We measured total mercury across species, age classes, and sexes from June to analyzed. for several species of ground spider and a web-building spider at these sites. Spiders from November of 2015 mine fire sites had total mercury levels over 2.5 times higher than those in riparian zones and 2016. Tetragnatha elongata Spiders analyzed for Hg adjacent to the power plant and about six times higher than those from agricultural fields or Spiders were sent to King’s riparian zones away from power plants.
    [Show full text]
  • Schizocosa Ocreata): a Comparison of Survivorship, Critical Body Water Content, and Water Loss Rates Between Sexes
    Canadian Journal of Zoology Dehydration resistance and tolerance in the brush -legged wolf spider (Schizocosa ocreata): A comparison of survivorship, critical body water content, and water loss rates between sexes. Journal: Canadian Journal of Zoology Manuscript ID cjz-2016-0133.R1 Manuscript Type: Article Date Submitted by the Author: 21-Nov-2016 Complete List of Authors: Herrmann,Draft Samantha; The Ohio State University, Evolution, Ecology, and Orgnaismal Biology Roberts, J. ; The Ohio State University at Newark, Evolution, Ecology, and Organismal Biology ECOLOGY < Discipline, PHYSIOLOGY < Discipline, ARANEAE < Taxon, Keyword: STRESS < Organ System, TEMPERATE < Habitat https://mc06.manuscriptcentral.com/cjz-pubs Page 1 of 30 Canadian Journal of Zoology Dehydration resistance and tolerance in the brush-legged wolf spider (Schizocosa ocreata ): A comparison of survivorship, critical body water content, and water loss rates between sexes. Samantha K. Herrmann, Department of Evolution, Ecology, and Organismal Biology, The Ohio State University, Columbus, Ohio, USA. ( [email protected] ) J. Andrew Roberts, Department of Evolution, Ecology, and Organismal Biology, The Ohio State University at Newark, Newark, Ohio, USA. ( [email protected] ) Corresponding Author: Samantha Herrmann,Draft 240B Jennings Hall, 1735 Neil Avenue, Columbus, Ohio, 43210, USA; Ph. 630.485.0636; Fx. 614 292-4390; [email protected] 1 https://mc06.manuscriptcentral.com/cjz-pubs Canadian Journal of Zoology Page 2 of 30 Dehydration resistance and tolerance in the wolf spider Schizocosa ocreata : A comparison of survivorship, critical body water content, and water loss rates between sexes. Samantha K. Herrmann and J. Andrew Roberts Small-bodied terrestrial animals like spiders face challenges maintaining water reserves essential for homeostasis.
    [Show full text]
  • 1 CHECKLIST of ILLINOIS SPIDERS Over 500 Spider Species Have Been
    1 CHECKLIST OF ILLINOIS SPIDERS Over 500 spider species have been reported to occur in Illinois. This checklist includes 558 species, and there may be records in the literature that have eluded the author’s attention. This checklist of Illinois species has been compiled from sources cited below. The initials in parentheses that follow each species name and authorship in the list denote the paper or other source in which the species was reported. Locality data, dates of collection, and other information about each species can be obtained by referring to the indicated sources. (AAS) American Arachnological Society Spider Species List for North America, published on the web site of the American Arachnological Society: http://americanarachnology.org/AAS_information.html (B&N) Beatty, J. A. and J. M. Nelson. 1979. Additions to the Checklist of Illinois Spiders. The Great Lakes Entomologist 12:49-56. (JB) Beatty, J. A. 2002. The Spiders of Illinois and Indiana, their Geolographical Affinities, and an Annotated Checklist. Proc. Ind. Acad. Sci. 1:77-94. (BC) Cutler, B. 1987. A Revision of the American Species of the Antlike Jumping Spider Genus Synageles (Araneae: Salticidae). J. Arachnol.15:321-348. (G&P) Gertsch, W. J. And N. I. Platnick. 1980. A Revision of the American Spiders of the Family Atypidae (Araneae, Mygalomorphae). Amer. Mus. Novitates 2704:1-39. (BK) Kaston, B. J. 1955. Check List of Illinois Spiders. Trans. Ill. State Acad. Sci. 47: 165- 172. (SK) Kendeigh, S. C. 1979. Invertebrate Populations of the Deciduous Forest Fluctuations and Relations to Weather. Illinois Biol. Monog. 50:1-107.
    [Show full text]
  • Epigeic Spider (Araneae) Diversity and Habitat Distributions in Kings
    Clemson University TigerPrints All Theses Theses 5-2011 Epigeic Spider (Araneae) Diversity and Habitat Distributions in Kings Mountain National Military Park, South Carolina Sarah Stellwagen Clemson University, [email protected] Follow this and additional works at: https://tigerprints.clemson.edu/all_theses Part of the Entomology Commons Recommended Citation Stellwagen, Sarah, "Epigeic Spider (Araneae) Diversity and Habitat Distributions in Kings Mountain National Military Park, South Carolina" (2011). All Theses. 1091. https://tigerprints.clemson.edu/all_theses/1091 This Thesis is brought to you for free and open access by the Theses at TigerPrints. It has been accepted for inclusion in All Theses by an authorized administrator of TigerPrints. For more information, please contact [email protected]. EPIGEIC SPIDER (ARANEAE) DIVERSITY AND HABITAT DISTRIBUTIONS IN KINGS MOUNTAIN NATIONAL MILITARY PARK, SOUTH CAROLINA ______________________________ A Thesis Presented to the Graduate School of Clemson University _______________________________ In Partial Fulfillment of the Requirements for the Degree Masters of Science Entomology _______________________________ by Sarah D. Stellwagen May 2011 _______________________________ Accepted by: Dr. Joseph D. Culin, Committee Chair Dr. Eric Benson Dr. William Bridges ABSTRACT This study examined the epigeic spider fauna in Kings Mountain National Military Park. The aim of this study is to make this information available to park management for use in the preservation of natural resources. Pitfall trapping was conducted monthly for one year in three distinct habitats: riparian, forest, and ridge-top. The study was conducted from August 2009 to July 2010. One hundred twenty samples were collected in each site. Overall, 289 adult spiders comprising 66 species were collected in the riparian habitat, 345 adult comprising 57 species were found in the forest habitat, and 240 adults comprising 47 species were found in the ridge-top habitat.
    [Show full text]