DOCSLIB.ORG

SENATE Official Committee Hansard

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
SENATE Official Committee Hansard COMMONWEALTH OF AUSTRALIA PARLIAMENTARY DEBATES SENATE Official Committee Hansard RURAL AND REGIONAL AFFAIRS AND TRANSPORT LEGISLATION COMMITTEE (Consideration of Estimates) THURSDAY, 19 SEPTEMBER 1996 BY AUTHORITY OF THE SENATE CANBERRA 1996 Thursday, 19 September 1996 SENATE—Legislation RRA&T 99 SENATE Thursday, 19 September 1996 RURAL AND REGIONAL AFFAIRS AND TRANSPORT LEGISLATION COMMITTEE Portfolios: Primary Industries and Energy; Transport and Regional Development Members: Senator Crane (Chair), Senator Conroy (Deputy Chair), Senators Calvert, Bob Collins, McGauran and Woodley Substitute members: Senator West to substitute for Senator Bob Collins on 13 September 1996. Senator Panizza to substitute for Senator Calvert for the period 16 to 20 September 1996 Participating members: Senators Abetz, Boswell, Brown, Brownhill, Chapman, Cook, Eggleston, Ferris, Forshaw, Gibbs, Harradine, Kemp, Ian Macdonald, Sandy Macdonald, Mackay, Margetts, Murray, Schacht, Tambling, Tierney and West The committee met at 1.12 p.m. DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORT AND REGIONAL DEVELOPMENT Proposed expenditure, $258,248,000 (Document A). Proposed provision, $209,626,000 (Document B). Consideration resumed from 17 September. In attendance Senator Parer, Minister for Resources and Energy Department of Transport and Regional Development— Executive Mr John Bowdler, Deputy Secretary Program 1—Aviation Subprogram 1.1—Aviation Policy Mr Peter Harris, First Assistant Secretary Mr Tony Wheelens, Assistant Secretary, International Relations Mr J. White, Assistant Secretary, Airport Regulation Mr Jim Wolfe, Acting Assistant Secretary, Aviation Industry Subprogram 1.2—Aviation Operations Mr Paul Merner, First Assistant Secretary Mr Ray Turner, Assistant Secretary, Aviation Security Branch Dr Hugh Milloy, Assistant Secretary, Sydney West Airport Taskforce Mr Ray Warren, Acting Assistant Secretary, Aviation Environment Branch RURAL AND REGIONAL AFFAIRS AND TRANSPORT RRA&T 100 SENATE—Legislation Thursday, 19 September 1996 Subprogram 1.3—Bureau of Air Safety Investigation Dr Rob Lee, Director Mr Ian McCallum, Deputy Director, Investigations Subprogram 1.4—International Air Services Commission Mr Danny Scorpecci, Executive Director Subprogram 1.5—Civil Aviation Safety Authority Mr Leroy A. Keith, Director of Aviation Safety Mr John Pike, Deputy Director Ms Sue-Ellen Bickford, General Manager, Finance Ms Marcia Kimball, General Manager, Human Resources Management Mr Rob Elder, General Manager, Corporate Relations Subprogram 1.6—Federal Airports Corporation Mr Peter Snelling, General Manager, Network Airports Subprogram 1.7—Airservices Australia Mr Bill Pollard, Chief Executive Officer Mr Peter Evans, General Manager, Air Traffic Services Mr Tom Grant, General Manager, Corporate and Employee Relations Mr Brian Kendal, Manager, Operational Policy Mr Colin Dahl, Manager, Environment Mr Graham Beer, Manager, Financial Strategy Mr Ian Rischbieth, Manager, Government Relations Program 2—Land Transport Subprogram 2.1—Road and Rail Policy Mr Bruce Gemmell, First Assistant Secretary Mr Andy Hrast, Acting Assistant Secretary, Roads Mr Warwick McNamara, Director, Roads Program Mr Daryl Quinlivan, Assistant Secretary, Rail Mr Stan Marks, Acting Director, Rail Enterprise Mr Richard Desmond, Director, Rail Policy Subprogram 2.2—Federal Office of Road Safety Mr Peter Makeham, First Assistant Secretary Mr Tony Ockwell, Assistant Secretary, Road User Subprogram 2.3—Australian National Mr Andrew Neal, Acting Managing Director Mr Alistair Powell, Chief Finance Officer Program 3—Maritime Subprogram 3.1—Maritime Mr Kym Bills, First Assistant Secretary RURAL AND REGIONAL AFFAIRS AND TRANSPORT Thursday, 19 September 1996 SENATE—Legislation RRA&T 101 Dr Greg Feeney, Assistant Secretary, National Shipping and Infrastructure Captain Kit Filor, Chief Investigator, Marine Incidents Mr David Holmes, Director, Marine Personnel and Administration Subprogram 3.2—Australian Maritime Safety Authority Mr Paul McGrath, Executive Officer Mr Brian Munro, General Manager, Corporate and Commercial Services Program 4—Regional Development Subprogram 4.1—Regional Development Mr Stephen Hunter, formerly First Assistant Secretary, Regional Development Ms Robyn Beetham, Assistant Secretary, Regional Development Ms Rosemary Cousin, Assistant Secretary, Regional Development Mr Steve Garlick, Assistant Secretary, Regional Development Mr John Okely, Assistant Secretary, Regional Development Ms Pieta-Rae Laut, formerly Director, Regional Development Mr Simon Murnane, Director, Regional Development Program 5—Corporate Direction and Support Subprogram 5.2—Management Support and Advice Mr Bill Ellis, First Assistant Secretary Mr John Elliott, Assistant Secretary, Finance and Services Subprogram 5.3—Research Mr Stephen Hunter, Director Ms Sue Elderton, Research Manager Dr Leo Dobes, Research Manager Mr David Luck, Research Manager Mr Len Hegedus, Manager, Corporate Services Department of Finance— Ms Anne Burhop Mr Stephen Hoult Ms Dianne Rimington CHAIR—I declare open this public hearing of the Senate Rural and Regional Affairs and Transport Legislation Committee. On 22 August 1996, the Senate referred to the committee the particulars of proposed expenditure in respect of the year ending 30 June 1997, and particulars of certain proposed expenditure in respect of the year ending 30 June 1997 of the following portfolio areas: Primary Industries and Energy, and Transport and Regional Development. On Tuesday the committee considered the proposed expenditure for the Department of Transport and Regional Development. Today the committee will conclude hearings on remaining programs from that portfolio. The committee will then examine estimates for the Department of Primary Industries and Energy and, if necessary, will conclude that portfolio RURAL AND REGIONAL AFFAIRS AND TRANSPORT RRA&T 102 SENATE—Legislation Thursday, 19 September 1996 during hearings commencing at 9.00 a.m. tomorrow. The committee is required to report to the Senate on or before 10 October 1996. Committee members and participating members have been provided with Portfolio Budget Statements for each of the portfolio areas to be considered, and I proposed to call on the estimates by program and subprogram as they appear in these statements. I draw the committee’s attention to the tight timetable for these estimates and foreshadow to departments and agencies that it is likely that the committee will nominate Monday, 14 October 1996 as the date for submission of written answers and additional information. I should also indicate that the committee has authorised the recording and rebroadcasting of its proceedings in accordance with rules contained in the order of the Senate of 23 August 1990. I welcome Minister Warwick Parer, who has replaced the Hon. Richard Alston. As there is a leaders meeting on now—this is particularly important for the departmental people—it has been agreed that Senators Harradine, Margetts, Brown, Kemp and Panizza, who are either full or participating members, will be able to go back to a program if they wish to do so. Senator Parer, do you wish to make any comment or statement? Senator Parer—No, Mr Chairman. [1.15 p.m.] Program 2—Land transport Subprogram 2.1—Road and rail policy development Senator CONROY—Can you provide the committee with a breakdown, on a state and territory basis, of funding for the national highway over the next four years? Mr Gemmell—We could only partially provide information on that in the sense that information is available for those projects that are approved, announced and under way. The minister has to make some decisions about new projects to commence in 1996-97 and in later years. Senator CONROY—Can you break the current ones down into asset preservation and any other identifiable categories, such as roads of national importance? Mr Gemmell—We can do that. Senator CONROY—Take that on notice? Mr Gemmell—Yes, please. Senator CONROY—Can you identify individual projects and advise what electorates they are in? Mr Gemmell—We certainly can advise what electorates they are in, yes. Senator CONROY—What is the benefit-cost ratio for each project? Mr Gemmell—We can provide that for all projects that are currently approved and on the program. Senator CONROY—I understand that $622 million has been cut from the national highway over the next four years. Is that correct? Mr Hrast—That figure is correct, yes. Senator BOB COLLINS—I must say, Minister, having had my head beaten in for three or four years by a fleet of National Party and Liberal Party members of parliament all over RURAL AND REGIONAL AFFAIRS AND TRANSPORT Thursday, 19 September 1996 SENATE—Legislation RRA&T 103 Australia for our sins and iniquities in terms of road funding, I am astonished at that figure. I don’t think there is a question in there anywhere, Minister. Senator CONROY—Can you provide a breakdown of the cuts to funding of the national highway system on the same basis as I just asked for the committed projects? Mr Gemmell—No. We can provide information on what funds are available, but it is not possible to tell you what projects may have been approved that will not now be approved. Senator CONROY—What was the basis of the cuts to road funding? Was it simply to meet the bottom line or was it based on an analysis of the state of the national highway system? Senator BOB COLLINS—It was a hypocritical government that was talking— CHAIR—It is not up to you to answer questions, Senator Collins. We have some very capable officers at the table. Mr Gemmell—All
Load more

Recommended publications
  • Attachment a (Sub 43A) the TOOMER AFFAIR' AUTHORITY's CRIMINAL CULTURE of RETRIBUTION & COVER UP
    Attachment A (Sub 43a) THE TOOMER AFFAIR' AUTHORITY'S CRIMINAL CULTURE OF RETRIBUTION & COVER UP By Keith Potter - 32 years diverse employment with the Australian Public Service, plus 28 years involvement in whistleblowing matters. Foreword: Authority's criminal culture of retribution and cover up has seriously damaged numerous whistleblowers and dissenters, and further harmed the public interest. This is exemplified by the case of Bill Toomer and his family, and irreparable damage to quarantine protection of public health and rural resources. Authority's culture of retribution seriously damaged Mr Toomer and his family. Occasional glimpses of their life are accordingly included. I have his permission to include this information. Summary: Bill Toomer was the Senior Quarantine and Grain Ships Inspector for Western Australia when he was demoted on disciplinary grounds for making false and unauthorised statement to the media. According to official reports he was an overzealous, egotistical and disobedient officer of such difficult character that he had to be transferred to Victoria "in the public interest" because he was unemployable in WA. The reality is that his problems started in Victoria where his thoroughness of inspection, and refusal of bribes, resulted in unscheduled ship fumigations. The resultant delays incurred considerable costs to the ship owners, mostly influential overseas owners, and problems for their Australian agents. His wings were clipped before he was returned to Victoria for final despatch. An officer of one of the Victorian sub agents to James Patrick Stevedoring P/L testified under oath that he was told that Toomer would be sent to WA where he would be "fixed up".
    [Show full text]
  • Legislation and Regulations, Media Releases and Policy Statements and Publications
    Appendix B Legislation and regulations, media releases and policy statements and publications Legislation and regulations, media releases and policy statements and publications Legislation and regulations Current 1. Foreign Acquisitions and Takeovers Act 1975 (Act No. 92 of 1975 as amended: see Appendix D) 2. Foreign Acquisitions and Takeovers Regulations 1989 (Statutory Rules No. 177 of 1989 as amended: see Appendix E) 3. Foreign Acquisitions and Takeovers (Notices) Regulations (Statutory Rules No. 226 of 1975 as amended: see Appendix E) Historical 1. Companies (Foreign Take-overs) Act 1973, No. 199 of 1973 — December 1973. 2. Companies (Foreign Take-overs) Act 1972, No. 134 of 1972 — November 1972. 83 Foreign Investment Review Board Annual Report 2005-06 Media releases and policy statements 1. Statement by the Treasurer, The Hon Peter Costello MP — Qantas Offer — 14 December 2006. 2. Statement by the Treasurer, The Hon Peter Costello MP — Foreign Investment: Brambles Industries Limited — 9 November 2006. 3. Statement by the Treasurer, The Hon Peter Costello MP — Foreign Investment Proposal: Thales Australia Holdings Pty Limited — Acquisition of remaining 50 per cent interest in ADI Limited — 12 October 2006. 4. Statement by the Treasurer, The Hon Peter Costello MP — Reappointment of member of Foreign Investment Review Board [Ms Lynn Wood] — 29 April 2005. 5. Statement by the Treasurer, The Hon Peter Costello MP — BHP Billiton Group — No objections raised to the acquisition of WMC Resources Limited, subject to conditions — 4 April 2005. 6. Statement by the Treasurer, The Hon Peter Costello MP — Xstrata Plc — No objections raised to the acquisition of WMC Resources Limited, subject to conditions — 11 February 2005.
    [Show full text]
  • Engaging Iran Australian and Canadian Relations with the Islamic Republic Engaging Iran Australian and Canadian Relations with the Islamic Republic
    Engaging Iran Australian and Canadian Relations with the Islamic Republic Engaging Iran Australian and Canadian Relations with the Islamic Republic Robert J. Bookmiller Gulf Research Center i_m(#ÆAk pA'v@uB Dubai, United Arab Emirates (_}A' !_g B/9lu( s{4'1q {xA' 1_{4 b|5 )smdA'c (uA'f'1_B%­'=¡(/ *_D |w@_> TBMFT!HSDBF¡CEudA'sGu( XXXHSDBFeCudC­'?B uG_GAE#­'c`}A' i_m(#ÆAk pA'v@uB9f1s{5 )smdA'c (uA'f'1_B%­'cAE/ i_m(#ÆAk pA'v@uBª E#'Gvp*E#'B!v,¢#'E#'1's{5%­''tDu{xC)/_9%_(n{wGL­i_m(#ÆAk pA'v@uAc8mBmA' , ¡dA'E#'c>EuA'&_{3A'B¢#'c}{3'(E#'c j{w*E#'cGuG{y*E#'c A"'E#'c CEudA%'eC_@c {3EE#'{4¢#_(9_,ud{3' i_m(#ÆAk pA'v@uBB`{wB¡}.0%'9{ymA'E/B`d{wA'¡>ismd{wd{3 *4#/b_dA{w{wdA'¡A_A'?uA' k pA'v@uBuCc,E9)1Eu{zA_(u`*­E @1_{xA'!'1"'9u`*1's{5%­''tD¡>)/1'==A'uA'f_,E i_m(#ÆA Gulf Research Center 187 Oud Metha Tower, 11th Floor, 303 Sheikh Rashid Road, P. O. Box 80758, Dubai, United Arab Emirates. Tel.: +971 4 324 7770 Fax: +971 3 324 7771 E-mail: [email protected] Website: www.grc.ae First published 2009 i_m(#ÆAk pA'v@uB Gulf Research Center (_}A' !_g B/9lu( Dubai, United Arab Emirates s{4'1q {xA' 1_{4 b|5 )smdA'c (uA'f'1_B%­'=¡(/ © Gulf Research Center 2009 *_D All rights reserved. No part of this publication may be reproduced, stored in |w@_> a retrieval system, or transmitted in any form or by any means, electronic, TBMFT!HSDBF¡CEudA'sGu( XXXHSDBFeCudC­'?B mechanical, photocopying, recording or otherwise, without the prior written permission of the Gulf Research Center.
    [Show full text]
  • Murray Goot- Public Opinion and the Democratic Deficit
    Public Opinion and the Democratic Deficit: Australia and the War Against Iraq by Murray Goot © all rights reserved. To facilitate downloading, this paper has been divided into parts I & II A few weeks after the return of the Howard Government, in November 2001, I was invited to speak at a joint meeting in Canberra of the Academy of Humanities in Australia and the Academy of the Social Sciences. At that time, the Prime Minister’s reputation as a man who fashioned his policies on the basis of opinion polls was at its height; not long before no less a figure than Paul Kelly, the country’s most distinguished political journalist, had described John Howard as ‘the most knee-jerk, poll-reactive, populist prime minister in the past 50 years’ (2000). Many in the audience were convinced that this was precisely how Howard had fashioned his government’s policies on a whole raft of issues, not least those to do with ‘race’; that it was on the basis of such policies, especially in relation to refugees, that his government had been returned; and for doing it they considered him deserving of the deepest disapprobation. Shortly before the Howard Government announced, on February 18, that Australia would join the United States and Britain in their attempt to disarm Iraq, I was invited to Canberra by another group of academics concerned that Howard was about to embroil Australia in a conflict without the formal authorisation of the Parliament; that far from following public opinion on the issue he was prepared to defy it; and that even for contemplating such a course they considered him deserving of the deepest disapprobation.
    [Show full text]
  • Australia: Background and U.S
    Order Code RL33010 CRS Report for Congress Received through the CRS Web Australia: Background and U.S. Relations Updated April 20, 2006 Bruce Vaughn Analyst in Southeast and South Asian Affairs Foreign Affairs, Defense, and Trade Congressional Research Service ˜ The Library of Congress Australia: Background and U.S. Interests Summary The Commonwealth of Australia and the United States are close allies under the ANZUS treaty. Australia evoked the treaty to offer assistance to the United States after the attacks of September 11, 2001, in which 22 Australians were among the dead. Australia was one of the first countries to commit troops to U.S. military operations in Afghanistan and Iraq. In October 2002, a terrorist attack on Western tourists in Bali, Indonesia, killed more than 200, including 88 Australians and seven Americans. A second terrorist bombing, which killed 23, including four Australians, was carried out in Bali in October 2005. The Australian Embassy in Jakarta, Indonesia, was also bombed by members of Jemaah Islamiya (JI) in September 2004. The Howard Government’s strong commitment to the United States in Afghanistan and Iraq and the recently negotiated bilateral Free Trade Agreement (FTA) between Australia and the United States have strengthened what were already close ties between the two long-term allies. Despite the strong strategic ties between the United States and Australia, there have been some signs that the growing economic importance of China to Australia may influence Australia’s external posture on issues such as Taiwan. Australia plays a key role in promoting regional stability in Southeast Asia and the Southwest Pacific.
    [Show full text]
  • Companion (Ac) in the General Division of the Order of Australia
    COMPANION (AC) IN THE GENERAL DIVISION OF THE ORDER OF AUSTRALIA Dr Martin Lee PARKINSON PSM, Department of the Prime Minister and Cabinet, 1 National Circuit, Barton ACT 2601 For eminent service to the Australian community through leadership in public sector roles, to innovative government administration and high level program delivery, to the development of economic policy, and to climate change strategy. Service includes: Secretary, Department of the Prime Minister and Cabinet, since 2016. Secretary, Department of the Treasury, 2011-2014. Secretary, Department of Climate Change, Energy Efficiency and Water, 2010-2011. Secretary, Department of Climate Change, 2007-2010. Deputy Secretary, Department of the Prime Minister and Cabinet, 2007. Deputy Secretary, Department of the Treasury, 2001-2007. Chair, Prime Minister's Task Group on Energy Efficiency, 2010. Head, Prime Minister's Task Group on Emissions Trading, 2006-2007. Senior Advisor to Federal Treasurers John Kerin, 1991, Ralph Willis, 1991, John Dawkins, 1991-1993. Involved in: The development of the Capital Gains Tax. Policy Development and Review Department, International Monetary Fund (IMF), 1997-2001. Australian G20 Deputy Finance Minister, Finance Ministers and Central Bank Governors Meeting, Melbourne, 2006. Non-Executive Director, ORICA Limited, 2015. Non-Executive Director, O'Connell Street Associates, 2015. Non-Executive Director, German-Australian Chamber of Industry and Commerce, 2015. Member, Policy Committee, Grattan Institute, 2015. Member, Advisory Board, Future Directions Project, Australian Federal Police, 2015-2016. Board Member, Reserve Bank of Australia, 2011-2014. Chair, Advisory Board, Australian Office of Financial Management, 2011-2014. Ex-officio Member, Board of Taxation, 2011-2014. Chair, Standard Business Reporting Board, 2011-2014.
    [Show full text]
  • Title of Publication
    Appendix B Legislation, media releases and policy statements and publications Legislation, media releases and policy statements and publications Legislation 1. Foreign Acquisitions and Takeovers Regulations (Amendment), No 1 — 23 March 2004. 2. Foreign Acquisitions and Takeovers Regulations (Amendment), No 199 — 10 September 1999. 3. Foreign Acquisitions and Takeovers Regulations (Amendment), No 416 — 17 January 1996. 4. Foreign Acquisitions and Takeovers Regulations (Amendment), No 295 — 31 August 1994. 5. Foreign Acquisitions and Takeovers Regulations (Amendment), No 302 — 24 September 1991. 6. Foreign Takeovers Amendment Act 1989, No 14 of 1989 — August 1989. 7. Commonwealth Functions (Statutes Review) Act 1981, No 74 of 1981 — June 1981. 8. Statutory Rules 1976, No 203 — September 1976. 9. Foreign Takeovers Amendment Act 1976, No 93 of 1976 — September 1976. 10. Statutory Rules 1975, No 226 — December 1975. 11. Foreign Takeovers Act 1975, No 92 of 1975 — August 1975 (now known as the Foreign Acquisitions and Takeovers Act 1975 as amended). 12. Companies (Foreign Take-overs) Act 1973, No 199 of 1973 — December 1973. 13. Companies (Foreign Take-overs) Act 1972, No 134 of 1972 — November 1972. 87 Foreign Investment Review Board Annual Report 2004-05 Media releases and policy statements 1. Statement by the Treasurer, The Hon Peter Costello MP — BHP Billiton Group — No objections raised to the acquisition of WMC Resources Limited, subject to conditions — 4 April 2005. 2. Statement by the Treasurer, The Hon Peter Costello MP — Xstrata Plc — No objections raised to the acquisition of WMC Resources Limited, subject to conditions — 11 February 2005. 3. Statement by the Treasurer, The Hon Peter Costello MP — Village Roadshow Limited — seeking information from parties who have acquired shares in Village Roadshow Limited on behalf of a number of foreign investors, including interests held by Swiss nominee banks — 9 February 2004.
    [Show full text]
  • Legislative Assembly
    6984 LEGISLATIVE ASSEMBLY Friday 9 June 2000 ______ Mr Speaker (The Hon. John Henry Murray) took the chair at 10.00 a.m.. Mr Speaker offered the Prayer. KU-RING-GAI CHASE NATIONAL PARK BUSHFIRE Mr SPEAKER: Yesterday the Minister for Emergency Services made a ministerial statement in this House in relation to a tragedy in the Ku-ring-gai area. The shadow minister, the honourable member for Southern Highlands, and the honourable member for Hornsby, in whose electorate that tragedy occurred, also addressed the House. It is now appropriate for the House to acknowledge the tragedy by observing a minute's silence. Members and officers of the House stood in their places. INDUSTRIAL RELATIONS AMENDMENT BILL Second Reading Debate resumed from 6 June. Mr HUMPHERSON (Davidson) [10.02 a.m.]: Mr Speaker, I echo the comments made by you, by the Minister for Emergency Services and by the honourable member for Hornsby in relation to the tragedy that occurred in the northern area of Sydney. Many of us are aware of and recognise the terrific job that is done under difficult circumstances by officers from the National Parks and Wildlife Service in the Ku-ring-gai Chase National Park and the Garigal National Park. Our thoughts are with the families of those who have been hit by this terrible tragedy. On behalf of the honourable member for Gosford and manager of Opposition business in this House, who is unavailable today, and the Hon. M. J. Gallacher, Leader of the Opposition in the other place and shadow Minister for Industrial Relations in the Legislative Council, I lead for the Opposition in debate on the Industrial Relations Amendment Bill.
    [Show full text]
  • Trade Liberalisation and the Australian Labor Party
    Australian Journal of Politics and History: Volume 48, Number 4, 2002, pp. 487-508. Trade Liberalisation and the Australian Labor Party ANDREW LEIGH* John F. Kennedy School of Government, Harvard University [T]he ideas of economists and political philosophers, both when they are right and when they are wrong, are more powerful than is commonly understood. Indeed the world is ruled by little else. John Maynard Keynes1 The three most substantial decisions to reduce Australia’s trade barriers — in 1973, 1988 and 1991 — were made by Labor Governments. Labor’s policy shift preceded the conversion of social democratic parties in other countries to trade liberalisation. To understand why this was so, it is necessary to consider trade policy as being shaped by more than interest groups and political institutions. Drawing on interviews with the main political figures, including Gough Whitlam, Bob Hawke, Paul Keating and John Button, this article explores why the intellectual arguments for free trade had such a powerful impact on Labor’s leadership, and how those leaders managed to implement major tariff cuts, while largely maintaining party unity. Labor and Free Trade In the space of a generation, Australia’s tariff walls have been dismantled. From 1970 to 2001, the average level of industry assistance fell from over thirty percent to under five percent.2 Yet in retrospect, what was perhaps most surprising was not that the era of protectionism came to an end — after all, this was a period in which tariffs were reduced across much of the developed world — but that in Australia, it was Labor Governments that took the lead in cutting industry protection.
    [Show full text]
  • “Wrong, Or at Best Misleading”: Public Policy and the Slow Recovery in Australia, 1990 – 1994 Joshua Black, the Australian National University
    “Wrong, or at Best Misleading”: Public Policy and the Slow Recovery in Australia, 1990 – 1994 Joshua Black, The Australian National University When the Australian economy entered its first recession for nearly thirty years in 2020, many pundits recalled their experiences of the previous downturn, the one that the then-Treasurer declared that we “had to have”. People remembered the “stubbornly high unemployment”, or the “jobless recovery”, and recalled their own experiences as “very tight”.1 Indeed, unemployment breached 11 per cent in July 1992 and was still at 9.2 per cent when the 1996 census was taken.2 To a profound extent, this was both a slow recovery and a jobless one. Why was the recovery so slow and painful for those who experienced it? Earlier commentary emphasised the role of monetary policy and the official cash rate, as if a few earlier movements on the way up or down could have changed “the main outlines of the boom and bust”.3 In this paper, I argue that the whole framework of economic policy that shaped the government’s response to the recession – a framework born out of the neoliberal 1980s – was built on flawed assumptions. First, the Hawke Government’s approach to macroeconomic management was limited by its obsession with (understandably) inflation and (less understandably) the current account deficit. These were the prime objectives of economic policy in the lead-up to the recession, fundamentally constraining policy options. Second, the government acted on the seemingly untenable assumption that employment growth would
    [Show full text]
  • A Dissident Liberal
    A DISSIDENT LIBERAL THE POLITICAL WRITINGS OF PETER BAUME PETER BAUME Edited by John Wanna and Marija Taflaga A DISSIDENT LIBERAL THE POLITICAL WRITINGS OF PETER BAUME Published by ANU Press The Australian National University Acton ACT 2601, Australia Email: [email protected] This title is also available online at press.anu.edu.au National Library of Australia Cataloguing-in-Publication entry Creator: Baume, Peter, 1935– author. Title: A dissident liberal : the political writings of Peter Baume / Peter Baume ; edited by Marija Taflaga, John Wanna. ISBN: 9781925022544 (paperback) 9781925022551 (ebook) Subjects: Liberal Party of Australia. Politicians--Australia--Biography. Australia--Politics and government--1972–1975. Australia--Politics and government--1976–1990. Other Creators/Contributors: Taflaga, Marija, editor. Wanna, John, editor. Dewey Number: 324.294 All rights reserved. No part of this publication may be reproduced, stored in a retrieval system or transmitted in any form or by any means, electronic, mechanical, photocopying or otherwise, without the prior permission of the publisher. Cover design and layout by ANU Press Printed by Griffin Press This edition © 2015 ANU Press CONTENTS Foreword . vii Introduction: A Dissident Liberal—A Principled Political Career . xiii 1 . My Dilemma: From Medicine to the Senate . 1 2 . Autumn 1975 . 17 3 . Moving Towards Crisis: The Bleak Winter of 1975 . 25 4 . Budget 1975 . 37 5 . Prelude to Crisis . 43 6 . The Crisis Deepens: October 1975 . 49 7 . Early November 1975 . 63 8 . Remembrance Day . 71 9 . The Election Campaign . 79 10 . Looking Back at the Dismissal . 91 SPEECHES & OTHER PRESENTATIONS Part 1: Personal Philosophies Liberal Beliefs and Civil Liberties (1986) .
    [Show full text]
  • The Legacy of John Kerin
    THE LEGACY OF JOHN KERIN A LABOR PARTY MAN OF RURAL POLICY BASED ON SCIENCE by Neil J. Inall Doctor of Philosophy 2015 Western Sydney University ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS The author of this study wishes to acknowledge the very significant support and guidance in developing this thesis by Professor W Bellotti who holds the Vincent Fairfax Chair in Sustainable Agriculture and Rural Development at the Hawkesbury campus within the University of Western Sydney at Richmond, NSW, Australia. The study would not have been attempted or completed without Professor Bellotti’s encouragement and guidance over five years. Acknowledgement is also due to the University itself for support. This researcher wishes to thank his wife and family for their ongoing tolerance and guidance over many days and nights. Without them the project would never have been contemplated. I also wish to acknowledge the year on year support by John Kerin for this project. He has answered innumerable questions and provided a copy of a key submission that gained the support of the Hawke Government for the establishment and financial support of the RRDCs. John Kerin entrusted me with bound copies of the numerous press releases and speeches made while he was Minister for Primary Industries and later Minister for Primary Industries and Energy as well as those speeches he has made since leaving Parliament. He has also provided copies of his extensive recollections in dealing with industry officials and state governments in the reform process he administered. Others who are warmly acknowledged
    [Show full text]