DOCSLIB.ORG

Bibliography

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Bibliography BIBLIOGRAPHY Adam, James. 1902. The Republic of Plato. Anderson, D. E. 1993. The Masks of Cambridge. Dionysos: A Commentary on Plato’s Adamson, Peter. 2002. The Arabic Plotinus. Symposium. Albany. London. Annas, Julia. 1974. ‘On the Albert, Karl. 1989. Über Platons Begriff der “Intermediates,”’Archiv für Geschichte Philosophie. Sankt Augustin. der Philosophie. 57, 146–65. Algra, Keimpe. 1995. Concepts of Space in — 1976. ‘Plato’s Republic and Feminism’, Greek Thought. Leiden. Philosophy. 51, 307–21. Allen, Michael. 1984. The Platonism of — 1977. ‘Plato and Aristotle on friendship Marsilio Ficino. Berkeley and London. and altruism’, Mind. 86, 532–54. Allen, R. E. (ed.). 1965a. Studies in Plato’s — 1981. An Introduction to Plato’s Metaphysics. London and New York. Republic. Oxford. — 1965b. ‘Participation and Predication in — 1985. ‘Self-Knowledge in Early Plato’s Middle Dialogues’, in R. E. Allen Plato’, in D. J. O’Meara (ed.), Platonic (ed.), 1965, pp. 43–60. Investigations. Washington, pp. 111–38. — 1970. The Euthyphro and Plato’s Earlier — 1999. Platonic Ethics: Old and New. Theory of Forms. London. Ithaca. — 1971. ‘Plato’s Earlier Theory of Forms’, Annas, Julia and Christopher Rowe (eds). in Gregory Vlastos (ed.), The Philosophy 2002a. New Perspectives on Plato, of Socrates. Plato II: A Collection of Modern and Ancient. Harvard and Critical Essays. Ethics, Politics and Cambridge. Philosophy of Art and Religion. Garden — 2002b. ‘What are Plato’s Middle City, pp. 319–34. Dialogues in the Middle of?’ in Julia Alline, Henri. 1915. Histoire du Texte de Annas and Christopher Rowe (eds), Platon. Paris. 2002b, pp. 1–25. Anagnostopoulos, Mariana. 2006. ‘The Apelt, Otto. 1919. Platons Dialog Divided Soul and the Desire for Good in ‘Parmenides’. Leipzig. Plato’s Republic’, in Gerasimos Santas Ardley, Gavin. 1967. ‘The Role of Play in (ed.), The Blackwell Guide to Plato’s the Philosophy of Plato’, Philosophy. 42, Republic. Oxford, pp. 166–88. 226–44. philosophy.press.continuumbooks.com © Gerald A. Press (2012) The Continuum Companion to Plato London: Continuum. BIBLIOGRAPHY Arieti, James. 1993. ‘Plato’s Philosophical Baltes, Matthias. 1997. ‘Is the Idea of the Antiope: the Gorgias’, in Gerald A. Press Good in Plato’s Republic Beyond Being?’ (ed.), Plato’s Dialogues: New Studies and in M. Yoal (ed.), Studies in Plato and the Interpretations. Lanham. Platonic Tradition, Essays Presented to J. Armstrong, David. 1973. Belief, Truth, and Whittaker. Hampshire, pp. 3–23. Knowledge. Cambridge. — 1999. ‘Is the Idea of the Good in Plato’s Arnim, Hans von. 1914. ‘Thrasymachos Republic beyond being?’ in Matthias über die Gerechtigkeit’, in Hans von Baltes (ed.), Dianoémata. Kleine Schriften Arnim (ed.), Platons Jugenddialoge zu Platon und zu Platonismus. Stuttgart und die Entstehungszeit des Phaidros. and Leipzig, pp. 351–71. Leipzig. Baltzly, Dirk. 1992. ‘Plato and the New Aronadio, Francesco. 2008. Dialoghi spuri Rhapsody’, Ancient Philosophy. 12, 29–52. di Platone. Torino. — 1996. ‘To an Unhypothetical First Atwill, Janet. 2009. Rhetoric Reclaimed. Principle’, History of Philosophy Ithaca. Quarterly. 13, 149–65. Ausland, Hayden W. 2000. ‘The — 1999. ‘Aristotle and Platonic Dialectic Euthydemus and the Dating of Plato’s in Metaphysics gamma 4’, Apeiron. 32, Dialogues’, in Thomas M. Robinson and 171–202. Luc Brisson (eds), On Plato: Euthydemus, Barker, Andrew. 1982. ‘Aristides Lysis, Charmides. Selected Papers from Quintilianus and Constructions in Early the Fifth Symposium Platonicum. Sankt Music Theory’, Classical Quarterly. 32, Augustin, pp. 20–2. 184–97. — 2002. ‘Plato’s Ideal Cosmopolitanism’, in — 1989. Greek Musical Writings. K. J. Boudouris (ed.), Fourteenth Annual Cambridge. Conference on Greek Philosophy. ‘Polis — 2000. ‘Timaeus on Music and the Liver’, and Cosmopolis: Problems of a Global in M. R. Wright (ed.), Reason and Era II’. Athens, pp. 33–50. Necessity: Essays on Plato’s Timaeus. — 2005. ‘Socrates’ Definitional Inquiries London, pp. 85–99. and the History of Philosophy’, in — 2007. The Science of Harmonics in Rachana Kamtekar and Sara Ahbel- Ancient Greece. Cambridge. Rappe (eds), The Backwell Companion to Barnes, Jonathan. 1979. The Presocratic Socrates. Oxford, pp. 493–510. Philosophers, Vol. 1: Thales to Zeno. — 2008. ‘Proëmial Prolepsis in Plato’s London. Politeia’, Symbolae Osloenses. 83, 18–44. Barney, Rachel. 2001. Names and Nature in Bailey, D. T. 2006. ‘Plato and Aristotle on Plato’s Cratylus. New York and London. the Unhypothetical’, Oxford Studies in — 2010. ‘Notes on Plato on the Kalon and the AncientPhilosophy. 30, 101–26. Good’, Classical Philology. 105, 363–77. Bailly, Jacques. 2004. The Socratic Theages: Baxter, Timothy M. S. 1992. The Cratylus: Introduction, English Translation, Greek Plato’s Critique of Naming. Leiden. Text and Commentary. Hildesheim, Beiser, Frederick. 2002. German Idealism. Zürich and New York. Cambridge. Balaguer, Mark. 1998. Platonism and Anti- — 2003. The Romantic Imperative. platonism in Mathematics. Oxford. Cambridge. philosophy.press.continuumbooks.com © Gerald A. Press (2012) The Continuum Companion to Plato London: Continuum. BIBLIOGRAPHY Belfiore, Elizabeth. 1983. ‘Plato’s Greatest Beversluis, John. 1993. ‘Vlastos’s Quest Accusation against Poetry’, Canadian for the Historical Socrates’, Ancient Journal of Philosophy. 9, 39–62. Philosophy. 13, 293–312. — Forthcoming. ‘Poets at the Symposium’, Blank, David. 1993a. ‘The Arousal of in Pierre Destrée and Fritz-Gregor Emotions in Plato’s Dialogues’, Classical Herrmann (eds), Plato and the Poets. Quarterly. 43, 428–39. Bélis, Annie. 2008. ‘Un Fragment de — 1993b. ‘Review article on: T. A. Szlezák, Traité Musical sur Papyrus (P. Tebt. III, Platon und die Schriftlichkeit der 694)’, in J.-L. Périllié (ed.), Platon et les Philosophy, and M. Erler, Der Sinn Pythagoriciens, Hierarchie des Savoirs der Aporien in den Dialogen Platons’, et des Pratiques: Cahiers de Philosophie Ancient Philosophy. 13, 414–26. Ancienne. 20, 225–36. Bloedow, Edmund F. 1975. ‘Aspasia and the Benardete, Seth. 1989. Socrates’ Second “Mystery” of the Menexenos’, Wiener Sailing: On Plato’s ‘Republic’. Chicago. Studien. 88, 32–48. — 1991. The Rhetoric of Morality and Blondell, Ruby. 2002. The Play of Character Philosophy: Plato’s ‘Gorgias’ and in Plato’s Dialogues. Cambridge. ‘Phaedrus’. Chicago and London. Bloom, Allan (trans.). 1968. The Republic of — 2000. The Argument of the Action: Plato. New York. Essays on Greek Poetry and Philosophy. — 1987. ‘An Interpretation of Plato’s Ion’, Chicago. in Thomas L. Pangle (ed.), The Roots Benitez, Eugenio. 2000. ‘Cowardice, Moral of Political Philosophy: Ten Forgotten Philosophy, and Saying What You Think’, Socratic Dialogues. Ithaca, pp. 371–95. in Gerald A. Press (ed.), Who Speaks for — 1991. ‘Interpretive Essay’, in The Republic Plato? Savage, pp. 83–98. of Plato. New York, pp. 305–436. — 2009. ‘Plato’s Music’, Special Issue of — 1993. Love and Friendship. New York. Literature and Aesthetics. 19. Bluck, R. S. 1956. ‘Logos and Forms in Benoit, William L. 1991. ‘Isocrates and Plato Plato’, Mind. 65, 522–9. on Rhetoric and Rhetorical Education’, — 1961. Plato’s Meno. Cambridge. Rhetoric Society Quarterly. 21, 60–71. — 1963. ‘Knowledge by Acquaintance in Benso, Silvia and Brian Schroeder (eds). Plato’s Theaetetus’, Mind. 72, 259–63. 2008. Levinas and the Ancients. — 1965. Plato’s Meno. Cambridge. Indianapolis. Bluestone, N. H. 1987. Women and the Benson, Hugh H. 2000. Socratic Wisdom: Ideal Society: Plato’s Republic and The Model of Knowledge in Plato’s Early Modern Myths of Gender. Amherst. Dialogues. New York. Blumenthal, H. J. 1971. Plotinus’ — 2003. ‘The Method of Hypothesis in the Psychology. The Hague. Meno’, Proceedings of the Boston Area Blumenthal, H. J. and A. C. Lloyd (eds). Colloquium in Ancient Philosophy. 18, 1982. Soul and the Structure of Being in 95–126. Late Neoplatonism. Liverpool. — 2006. A Companion to Plato. Oxford. Bobonich, Christopher. 1994. ‘Akrasia and Betegh, G. 2004. The Derveni Papyrus, Agency in Plato’s Laws and Republic’, Cosmology, Theology and Interpretation. Archiv für Geschichte der Philosophie. Cambridge. 76, 3–36. philosophy.press.continuumbooks.com © Gerald A. Press (2012) The Continuum Companion to Plato London: Continuum. BIBLIOGRAPHY — 2002. Plato’s Utopia Recast. Oxford. Cambridge Companion to Atheism. Bolotin, David. 1979. Plato’s Dialogue Cambridge, pp. 149–65. on Friendship: An Interpretation of the Brisson, Luc. 1987. Platon: Lettres. Paris. Lysis. Ithaca. Brisson, Luc and Gerard Naddaf. 1994. Bolton, Robert. 1975. ‘Plato’s Distinction Le Même et l’Autre dans la structure between Being and Becoming’, Review of ontologique du Timée de Platon. Sankt Metaphysics. 29, 66–95. Augustin. Bonazzi, Mauro. 2008. ‘Towards — 1999. Plato: The Mythmaker. Chicago Transcendence: Philo and the Renewal and London. of Platonism in the Early Imperial — 2004. How Philosophers Saved Myths: Age’, in Francesca Alesse (ed.), Philo Allegorical Interpretation and Classical of Alexandria and Post Aristotelian Mythology. Chicago. Philosophy. Leiden, pp. 233–52. — 2006. ‘Agathon, Pausanias, and Diotima Bordt, Michael. 1998. Platon: Lysis. in Plato’s Symposium. Paiderastia and Göttingen. Philosophia’, in James H. Lesher, Debra Bos, E. P. and P. A. Meijer (eds). 1992. On Nails and Frisbee Sheffield (eds), Plato’s Proclus and his Influence in Medieval Symposium: Issues, interpretation and Philosophy. Leiden, Köln and New York. reception. Washington DC, 229–51. Brancacci, Aldo. 2005. Antisthène: Le Brown, Eric.
Load more

Recommended publications
  • Gregory Vlastos, Socrates
    72 Gregory Vlastos, Socrates: Ironist and ~oral Philosopher (Cam­ bridge: Cambridge University Press, 1991), ISBN 0 521 307333 hardback £35/$57-50; ISB~ 0 521 31450X paperback £11-95/S16-95. Socrates: Ironist and Noral Philosopher (SINP) is a book that all students of Socrates and of Greek philosophy will have to read, and will benefit from reading. It isn't the complete portrait of Socrates that many of us hoped it would be (for example, it contains no full discussion of the elenchus) and it is not all new much of it is already familiar from journal articles. It reads, indeed, more like a collection of articles than a unified book, but it is none the less engaging and provocative for that, the product of hard thinking by a major scholar and a life-long Socratist It is also very well written. I shall focus on only a few central themes. 1. Socrates and Plato Vlastos (pp. 46-7) divides the Platonic dialogues into four classes: (1) ELENCTIC; Apology, Charmides, Crico, Euthyphro, Gorgias, Hippias Ninor, Ion, Laches, Protagoras, Republic I (2) TRANSITIONAL: Eu thydemus, Hippias l1ajor, Lysis, l1enexenus, l1eno (3) MIDDLE: Cratylus, Phaedo, Symposium, Republic II-X, Phaedrus, Parmenides, Theaetetus (4) LATE: Timaeus, Crit ias, Sophist, Politicus, Philebus, Laws 73 He believes that the protagonist of the elenctic dialogues ("SocratesE") is the historical Socrates. while the protagonist of the middle and later dialogues ("SocratesM") is little more than a mouthpiece for Plato. Many scholars would go along with this thesis. but they might well balk at the members of (2).
    [Show full text]
  • John Stuart Mill’Sworksare by Title, Followed by Volume and Pagenumber of the Collected Works of John Stuart Mill (CW), Edited by J.M
    Roots of Respect Roots of Respect A Historic-Philosophical Itinerary Edited by Giovanni Giorgini and Elena Irrera An electronic version of this book is freely available, thanks to the support of libra- ries working with Knowledge Unlatched. KU is a collaborative initiative designed to make high quality books Open Access. More information about the initiative can be found at www.knowledgeunlatched.org ISBN 978-3-11-021808-4 e-ISBN (PDF) 978-3-11-021809-1 e-ISBN (EPUB) 978-3-11-021806-2 ISBN 978-3-11-044813-9 ISSN 0179-0986 e-ISBN (PDF) 978-3-11-052628-8 e-ISSN 0179-3256 This work is licensed under the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivs 3.0 License. This work is licensed under the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivs 3.0 License, For details go to http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/3.0/. as of February 23, 2017. For details go to http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/3.0/. Library of Congress Cataloging-in-Publication Data Library of Congress Cataloging-in-Publication Data A CIP catalog record for this book has been applied for at the Library of Congress. A CIP catalog record for this book has been applied for at the Library of Congress. Bibliografic information published by the Deutsche Nationalbibliothek Bibliografische Information der Deutschen Nationalbibliothek The Deutsche Nationalbibliothek lists this publication in the Deutschen Nationalbibliografie; Die Deutsche Nationalbibliothek verzeichnet diese Publikation in der Deutschen Nationalbibliogra- detailed bibliografic data are available on the Internet at http://dnb.dnb.de. fie; detaillierte bibliografische Daten sind im Internet über http://dnb.dnb.de abrufbar.
    [Show full text]
  • Chaos and Control: Reading Plato's Politicus1
    Review Article Chaos and Control: Reading PlatoÕs Politicus1 MARY MARGARET M CCABE On rst reading, the Politicus appears a dismal dialogue (compared, for example, to the immediacy of both the philosophy and the drama of the Theaetetus). This conversation between the Eleatic Stranger and the hopelessly complaisant Young Socrates seems unlikely to capture our imagination; the lengthy discussion of col- lection and division may do little for our understanding of dialectic; and even the joke (at 266c, a pun on being a pig and coming last which is marginally more amusing in Greek) will leave us cold. It may be hardly surprising that Òthis weary dialogue,Ó as Gilbert Ryle called it, has been left alone by scholars. However a recent Symposium Platonicum has revived interest in the Politicus;2 this generated two volumes of papers given at the Symposium and, more impor- tantly, a new translation with commentary by Christopher Rowe. 3 The new OCT, moreover, gives a freshly edited text. 4 This material makes it immediately clear that the Politicus should not be dismissed out of hand – even although it stands revealed as an extremely complex composition, both from the literary and from the philosophical point of view. 1 Christopher Rowe, Bob Sharples and Tad Brennan were kind enough to read and criticise a draft of these comments; I am very grateful to them. 2 Old habits die hard; I prefer Politicus (Plt.) to Statesman, not least to avoid the dangers of archaism (and the impossibility of capturing an extinct species) in the English expression. In deference to Plato, however, I use the expression Òthe states- manÓ (rather than Òthe politicianÓ) to describe the person with political understanding.
    [Show full text]
  • 2011: Durham University
    THE CLASSICAL ASSOCIATION ANNUAL CONFERENCE DURHAM UNIVERSITY FRIDAY 15TH APRIL - MONDAY 18TH APRIL 2011 CONFERENCE INFORMATION We are delighted to invite you to attend the 2011 Classical Association Annual Conference, which this year will be hosted by Durham University. Founded by Royal Charter in 1832, Durham University is among the contenders to the title of third oldest University of England; yet despite its ancient roots, Durham prides itself on combining tradition with innovation. The same is true of its Classics Department, one of the largest, youngest, and most international Classics Departments around. Two-thirds of staff in the department are non- British nationals: Germany, Italy, the Netherlands, Serbia, and the USA are all represented; current research postgraduates add Egypt, Greece, Hungary, Korea, and Japan to the list. All of this is testimony to our view that Classics not only continues to be relevant, but has become increasingly important as a shared cultural resource through which diverse contemporary cultures can communicate. In various ways, then, Durham Classics operates across boundaries of time and of space and stands for intellectual exchange across languages and cultures, and it is this spirit of open exchange and dialogue that we hope to enact and celebrate during the Classical Association Annual Conference as well. The Durham colleges allow us to return to the traditional format of the on-campus event, with both accommodation and academic sessions in the main conference venue, Collingwood College. It will however also be possible to book a room at the Business school, or at the Marriott; and Durham city offers a range of other possibilities.
    [Show full text]
  • Sophist Revisited Trends in Classics Q Supplementary Volumes
    Plato’s Sophist Revisited Trends in Classics Q Supplementary Volumes Edited by Franco Montanari and Antonios Rengakos Scientific Committee Alberto Bernabe´ · Margarethe Billerbeck · Claude Calame Philip R. Hardie · Stephen J. Harrison · Stephen Hinds Richard Hunter · Christina Kraus · Giuseppe Mastromarco Gregory Nagy · Theodore D. Papanghelis · Giusto Picone Kurt Raaflaub · Bernhard Zimmermann Volume 19 De Gruyter Plato’s Sophist Revisited Edited by Beatriz Bossi Thomas M. Robinson De Gruyter ISBN 978-3-11-028695-3 e-ISBN 978-3-11-028713-4 ISSN 1868-4785 Library of Congress Cataloging-in-Publication Data A CIP catalog record for this book has been applied for at the Library of Congress. Bibliographic information published by the Deutsche Nationalbibliothek The Deutsche Nationalbibliothek lists this publication in the Deutsche Nationalbibliografie; detailed bibliographic data are available in the Internet at http://dnb.dnb.de. Ą 2013 Walter de Gruyter GmbH, Berlin/Boston Logo: Christopher Schneider, Laufen Printing: Hubert & Co. GmbH & Co. KG, Göttingen ϱ Printed on acid-free paper Printed in Germany www.degruyter.com Preface This book consists of a selection of papers presented at the International Spring Seminar on Plato’s Sophist (26–31 May 2009, Centro de Ciencias de Benasque ‘Pedro Pascual’, Spain) with the financial support of MI- CINN, CSIC, Universidad de Zaragoza and Gobierno de Aragón. The Conference was organized by the editors, under the auspices of the Director of the Centre, Prof. José Ignacio Latorre, who provided invaluable assistance at every stage of the Conference, up to its close with a lecture on Quantum Physics for Philosophers. The aim of the conference was the promotion of Plato studies in Spain in the framework of discussions with a number of international scholars of distinction in the field, whilst at the same time looking afresh at one of Plato’s most philosophically profound dialogues.
    [Show full text]
  • Gregory Vlastos
    Gregory Vlastos: A Preliminary Inventory of His Papers at the Harry Ransom Center Descriptive Summary Creator: Vlastos, Gregory, 1907-1991 Title: Gregory Vlastos Papers Dates: circa 1930s-1991 Extent: 100 document boxes (42.00 linear feet) Abstract: The papers of philosopher Gregory Vlastos, a scholar of ancient Greek philosophy who spent most of his career studying the thought of Plato and Socrates, document his studies, his writings, and his career as an educator at several American universities. Call Number: Manuscript Collection MS-4361 Language: English, with Ancient Greek, French, German, Italian, Latin, Modern Greek, and Spanish Access: Open for research Administrative Information Acquisition: Gifts, 1993-2010 (G9070, G9134, G9163, G9225, G9252, G9628, G9979, G9982, G10214, G10288, G11877, 10-03-014-G) Processed by: Hope Rider, 2006; updated by Joan Sibley, 2016 Repository: The University of Texas at Austin, Harry Ransom Center Vlastos, Gregory, 1907-1991 Manuscript Collection MS-4361 Scope and Contents The papers of philosopher Gregory Vlastos (1907-1991), a scholar of ancient Greek philosophy who spent most of his career studying the thought of Plato and Socrates, document his studies, his writings, and his career as an educator at several American universities, especially Cornell, Princeton, and The University of California at Berkeley. The papers are arranged in six series: I. Correspondence and Offprint Files, II. Study, Lecture, and Teaching Files, III. Works, IV. Works by Others, V. Miscellaneous, and VI. Offprints Removed from Manuscripts. The Correspondence and Offprint Files (35 boxes) in Series I. represent Vlastos' extensive correspondence with other philosophers, classicists, former students, academics, and others. The files are arranged alphabetically by correspondent name, and generally include not only letters received, but copies of Vlastos' responses.
    [Show full text]
  • The Science of Philosophy: Discourse and Deception in Plato's Sophist
    The Science of Philosophy - Discourse and Deception in Plato’s Sophist - For Epoché [Penultimate ver.] The Science of Philosophy: Discourse and Deception in Plato’s Sophist Olof Pettersson Abstract: At 252e1 to 253c9 in Plato’s Sophist, the Eleatic Visitor explains why philosophy is a science. Like the art of grammar, philosophical knowledge corresponds to a generic structure of discrete kinds and is acquired by systematic analysis of how these kinds intermingle. In the literature, the Visitor’s science is either understood as an expression of a mature and authentic platonic metaphysics, or as a sophisticated illusion staged to illustrate the seductive lure of sophistic deception. By showing how the Visitor’s account of the science of philosophy is just as comprehensive, phantasmatic and self-concealing as the art of sophistry identified at the dialogue’s outset, this paper argues in favor of the latter view. Introduction At 252e1 to 253c9 in Plato’s Sophist, the Eleatic Visitor1 explains what he means by philosophy. Like the art of grammar, philosophy is about parts: All things can be analyzed. But not all parts fit together. Just like the letters of the alphabet, some can be combined and some cannot. According to the Visitor, it is knowledge about this that constitutes philosophy (253d1-e2) – a science he classifies as the greatest of them all (253c4-9). In the literature there are two main takes on this. Either the Visitors’ philosophical science is taken to be an expression of an authentic and mature platonic metaphysics; or it is said to be a sophisticated illusion staged to illustrate the seductive lure of sophistic deception.
    [Show full text]
  • The Mathematical Anti-Atomism of Plato's Timaeus
    The mathematical anti-atomism of Plato’s Timaeus Luc Brisson, Salomon Ofman To cite this version: Luc Brisson, Salomon Ofman. The mathematical anti-atomism of Plato’s Timaeus. Ancient Philoso- phy, Philosophy Documentation Center, In press. hal-02923266 HAL Id: hal-02923266 https://hal.archives-ouvertes.fr/hal-02923266 Submitted on 26 Aug 2020 HAL is a multi-disciplinary open access L’archive ouverte pluridisciplinaire HAL, est archive for the deposit and dissemination of sci- destinée au dépôt et à la diffusion de documents entific research documents, whether they are pub- scientifiques de niveau recherche, publiés ou non, lished or not. The documents may come from émanant des établissements d’enseignement et de teaching and research institutions in France or recherche français ou étrangers, des laboratoires abroad, or from public or private research centers. publics ou privés. The mathematical anti-atomism of Plato’s Timaeus Luc Brisson Salomon Ofman Centre Jean Pépin CNRS-Institut mathématique de Jussieu- CNRS-UMR 8230 Paris Rive Gauche École normale supérieure Sorbonne Université Paris Sciences Lettres Paris Université Abstract. In Plato’s eponymous dialogue, Timaeus, the main character presents the universe as an almost perfect sphere filled by tiny invisible particles having the form of four regular polyhedrons. At first glance, such a construction may seem close to an atomic theory. However, one does not find any text in Antiquity tying Timaeus’ cosmology to the atomists, and Aristotle made a clear distinction between Plato and the latter. Despite the cosmology in the Timaeus is so far apart from the one of the atomists, Plato is commonly presented in contemporary literature as some sort of atomist, sometimes as supporting a so-called form of ‘mathematical atomism’.
    [Show full text]
  • Early Greek Ethics
    Comp. by: SatchitananthaSivam Stage : Proof ChapterID: 0004760437 Date:25/2/20 Time:13:07:47 Filepath:d:/womat-filecopy/0004760437.3D Dictionary : NOAD_USDictionary 3 OUP UNCORRECTED AUTOPAGE PROOFS – FIRST PROOF, 25/2/2020, SPi Early Greek Ethics Edited by DAVID CONAN WOLFSDORF 1 Comp. by: SatchitananthaSivam Stage : Proof ChapterID: 0004760437 Date:25/2/20 Time:13:07:47 Filepath:d:/womat-filecopy/0004760437.3D Dictionary : NOAD_USDictionary 5 OUP UNCORRECTED AUTOPAGE PROOFS – FIRST PROOF, 25/2/2020, SPi Table of Contents Abbreviations ix Chapter Abstracts and Contributor Information xiii Introduction xxvii David Conan Wolfsdorf PART I INDIVIDUALS AND TEXTS 1. The Pythagorean Acusmata 3 Johan C. Thom 2. Xenophanes on the Ethics and Epistemology of Arrogance 19 Shaul Tor 3. On the Ethical Dimension of Heraclitus’ Thought 37 Mark A. Johnstone 4. Ethics and Natural Philosophy in Empedocles 54 John Palmer 5. The Ethical Life of a Fragment: Three Readings of Protagoras’ Man Measure Statement 74 Tazuko A. van Berkel 6. The Logos of Ethics in Gorgias’ Palamedes, On What is Not, and Helen 110 Kurt Lampe 7. Responsibility Rationalized: Action and Pollution in Antiphon’s Tetralogies 132 Joel E. Mann 8. Ethical and Political Thought in Antiphon’s Truth and Concord 149 Mauro Bonazzi 9. The Ethical Philosophy of the Historical Socrates 169 David Conan Wolfsdorf 10. Prodicus on the Choice of Heracles, Language, and Religion 195 Richard Bett 11. The Ethical Maxims of Democritus of Abdera 211 Monte Ransome Johnson 12. The Sophrosynē of Critias: Aristocratic Ethics after the Thirty Tyrants 243 Alex Gottesman Comp. by: SatchitananthaSivam Stage : Proof ChapterID: 0004760437 Date:25/2/20 Time:13:07:48 Filepath:d:/womat-filecopy/0004760437.3D Dictionary : NOAD_USDictionary 6 OUP UNCORRECTED AUTOPAGE PROOFS – FIRST PROOF, 25/2/2020, SPi vi 13.
    [Show full text]
  • AN INTRODUCTION to PRE-SOCRATIC ETHICS: HERACLITUS and DEMOCRITUS on HUMAN NATURE and CONDUCT (PART I: on MOTION and CHANGE) Erman Kaplama
    Cosmos and History: The Journal of Natural and Social Philosophy, vol. 17, no. 1, 2021 AN INTRODUCTION TO PRE-SOCRATIC ETHICS: HERACLITUS AND DEMOCRITUS ON HUMAN NATURE AND CONDUCT (PART I: ON MOTION AND CHANGE) Erman Kaplama ABSTRACT: Both Heraclitus and Democritus, as the philosophers of historia peri phuseôs, consider nature and human character, habit, law and soul as interrelated, emphasizing the links between phusis, kinesis, ethos, logos, kresis, nomos and daimon. On the one hand, Heraclitus’s principle of change (panta rhei) and his emphasis on the element of fire and cosmic motion ultimately dominate his ethics, reinforcing his ideas of change, moderation, balance and justice; on the other, Democritus’s atomist description of phusis and motion underlies his principle of moderation and his ideas of health and measured life. In this series, particularly referring to the main principles of motion, moderation and justice, I attempt to describe a coherent pre-Socratic ethical perspective based on the Heraclitean and Democritean fragments. I explore the connections between their physics and ethics, also borrowing from Nietzsche’s lectures and writings on the Pre-Socratics. I redefine such Heraclitean and Democritean concepts as harmony, order, perfection, health, self-control, contentment, cheerfulness, concord, sound judgment, wisdom, measure and balance and discuss them under the principles of motion (phusis), moderation (sophrosyne) and justice. In doing so, I also expose the relevance of the Heraclitean notion of logos (interpreting it as the underlying categorical principle of transition between phusis and ethos) in bringing together these ideas and principles. Finally, based on this pre-Socratic Weltanschauung, I assess the possibility of a coherent picture of humanity, its nature and conduct as extending from or fitting into or extending-from-when- fitting-into the cosmos of moving forces and atoms.
    [Show full text]
  • Rethinking Bernard Williams' Criticism of the City-Soul Analogy in Plato's Republic
    The 3rd BESETO Conference of Philosophy Session 14 Rethinking Bernard Williams’ Criticism of the City-Soul Analogy in Plato’s Republic (draft) WU Tianyue Peking University Abstract This essay takes a close look at Bernard Williams’ criticism of the city-soul analogy in Plato’s Republic, which “has dominated the discussion of its subject ever since.” (Myles Burnyeat). I start with reviving Williams’ arguments to elucidate the genuine challenge to Plato’s theory of justice by introducing city-soul analogy. The second part of this essay aims to show that Williams’ critics, such as Jonathan Lear, G.R.F. Ferrari, and Nobert Blössner have not successfully solved the problems Williams brought forth in his article. Finally, I call attention to a neglected aspect of the city-soul analogy, i.e. the predominance of reason in Plato’s theory of justice. By carefully analyzing Plato’s account of justice and briefly addressing the discussion about philosopher-kings in Book V–VII, I argue that Plato actually defines justice as the rule of the reasoning part. With this new definition of justice, the city-soul analogy will be shown philo- sophically accountable within the whole argumentative structure of Republic. It is well known that Republic is not an accurate translation of the ancient Greek word πολιτεία, whose meanings range from “condition and rights of a citizen” to “constitution of a state”1. The Chinese translation Li Xiang Guo, which literally means the ideal state, even goes further to iden- tify Plato’s magnum opus as a utopian writing. However, Plato’s or Socrates’ mythical narrative2 of the ideal city (καλλιπόλις) and its constitution starts rather late in the middle of Book II of Republic.
    [Show full text]
  • Confusion About the Socratic Method
    68 Confusion About the Socratic Method Confusion about the Socratic Method: Socratic Paradoxes and Contemporary Invocations of Socrates Rob Reich Stanford University Ask the average person, “Who was Socrates and what did he do?” and you are likely to get the following response: Socrates was a old philosopher who bothered people with questions and was ultimately put to death. Almost twenty-five hundred years after placidly drinking the hemlock, what we remember Socrates for is his habitual questioning, his demand to live an examined life.1 The figure of Socrates is in ordinary discourse synonymous with his method — the Socratic method. Contemporary scholars echo this commonplace opinion. Gregory Vlastos, who devoted his entire life to Socratic scholarship, reflects that the Socratic method is Socrates’ “greatest contribution” and moreover, one which ranks “among the greatest achievements of humanity.”2 The results of Socrates’ life, the conclusions he drew about how we ought to live, Vlastos argues, are less important than the manner in which he conducted his life, the style of inquiry he originated and bequeathed to future generations. Indeed, aside from philosophers, few today could identify what specific beliefs Socrates held. In contrast to most other great thinkers, Socrates’ primary legacy is not a contribution to humanity’s storehouse of knowl- edge, but a pedagogy; not substance but process. To overstate only slightly, for Socrates, and for our understanding of him, method is all. Yet despite the general acknowledgment of Socrates’ achievement, it is not at all clear what exactly the Socratic method is, and more specifically, what the Socratic method does, either in the dialogues or in contemporary invocations.
    [Show full text]