Report Environmental and Social Impact Assessment of the Project

Total Page:16

File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

Report Environmental and Social Impact Assessment of the Project REPORT ENVIRONMENTAL AND SOCIAL IMPACT ASSESSMENT OF THE PROJECT “IDENTIFICATION, DESIGN OR PRIORITIZED MEASURES TO ADDRESS SAFETY CONCERNS AND PREVENT LOSS OF HERITAGE STRUCTURES IN THE CASTLE OF GJIROKASTRA” Category (Pursuant to Annex II of Albanian Law No. 10440, dated 07.07.2011 and Directive 2011/92/EU on EIA): 10. Infrastructure Projects. b) Urban development projects, including the construction of shopping centres and car parks. Developer: Albanian Development Fund (ADF) Prepared by: Dr. Gazmend Zeneli License No. LN-9639-05-2015 "Expertize and/or professional service linked to Environmental Impact Assessment”. DECEMBER 2020 Page | 1 TABLE OF CONTENT I. INTRODUCTION ..................................................................................... 10 1.1. PROJECT PURPOSE .................................................................... 10 1.2. ENVIRONMENTAL AND SOCIAL IMPACT ASESSMENT PURPOSE 11 II. LEGAL FRAMEWORK AND SAFEGUARD PROCEDURES ........................ 13 2.1. ENVIRONMENTAL LEGISLATION IN ALBANIA ............................. 13 2.2. SOCIAL LEGISLATION ................................................................. 16 2.2.1. Legislation on territory planning and cultural heritage .... 16 2.2.2. Labour related legislation ................................................ 18 2.2.3. Legislation on Private Property and Expropriation ........... 19 2.2.4. Legislation on the Access to Information .......................... 21 2.3. WORLD BANK ENVIRONMENTAL AND SOCIAL SAFEGUARD POLICIES .................................................................................... 22 III. ENVIRONMENTAL AND SOCIAL BASELINE CONDITIONS ...................... 25 3.1. SOCIAL BASELINE ...................................................................... 25 3.1.1. Location ............................................................................ 25 3.1.2. Population ......................................................................... 26 3.1.3. Infrastructure .................................................................... 26 3.1.4. Economic Development and Employment .......................... 27 3.1.5. Culture and Religion .......................................................... 27 3.1.6. Tourism in Gjirokastra ...................................................... 29 3.1.7. Castle of Gjirokastra .......................................................... 33 3.2. PHYSICAL ENVIRONMENT .......................................................... 35 3.2.1. Climate .............................................................................. 35 3.2.2. Geological Overview of Gjirokasta area ............................... 40 3.2.3. Hydrogeology ..................................................................... 43 3.2.4. Air Quality ......................................................................... 44 3.2.5. Noise (Acoustic pollution) ................................................... 45 3.2.6. Seizmic Hazardous in Gjirokastra ...................................... 46 Page | 2 3.3. BIOLOGICAL ENVIRONMENT ...................................................... 51 3.3.1. Protected Areas ................................................................. 51 3.3.2. Endemic and endangered species ...................................... 53 3.3.3. Vegetation at the project site .............................................. 54 3.3.4. Bats Colonies .................................................................... 59 IV. DESCRIPTION OF THE PROJECT .......................................................... 60 4.1 PROJECT SITE LAYOUT .............................................................. 61 4.2. ASSESSMENT OF THE EXISTING SITUATION ............................. 64 4.2.1. Assesment philosophy ....................................................... 64 4.2.2. Assessment Methodology ................................................... 66 4.2.3. Schedule of conservation plan. .......................................... 68 4.2.4. Structural, Geological and Hydrological Analysis ............... 71 4.2.5. Structural, Geological and Hydrological Analysis ............... 76 4.3. DESCRIPTION OF CONSTRUCTION PROCESSES ........................ 82 4.3.1. Prioritized long list of interentions ..................................... 85 4.3.2. Needs for interventions in Tower A ..................................... 90 4.3.3. Structural Interventions Criteria ........................................ 92 4.3.4. Short –term intervention on the project area ...................... 94 4.3.5. Schedule of medium term .................................................. 98 4.3.6. Schedule of long term ...................................................... 100 V. METHODOLOGY FOR IMPACT IDENTIFICATION AND ANALYSIS ......... 102 5.1. METHODOLOGY FOR ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT ASSESSMENT . 102 5.1.1. Impact Significance ......................................................... 102 5.1.2. Impact Description .......................................................... 103 5.1.3. Impact Evaluation ........................................................... 103 5.2. METHODOLOGY FOR SOCIAL IMPACT ASSESSMENT .............. 105 VI. IDENTIFICATION OF POTENTIAL ENVIRONMENTAL AND SOCIAL IMPACTS ............................................................................................. 109 6.1. ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACTS ...................................................... 109 6.1.1. Impact on vegetation and fauna ....................................... 109 6.1.2. Impacts on Bat colonies ................................................... 109 6.1.3. Impact on Geology ........................................................... 110 Page | 3 6.1.4. Impact on Hydrology and Hydrogeology ........................... 110 6.1.5. Soil and Erosion .............................................................. 111 6.1.6. Increase in waste amounts .............................................. 111 6.1.7. Impact on air quality ....................................................... 112 6.1.8. Impact on the acoustic environment - Vibrations ............. 113 6.2. SOCIAL IMPACTS ...................................................................... 116 6.2.1. Income to material suppliers and contractors: ................. 116 6.2.2. Employment .................................................................... 116 6.2.3. Contract mobilization ...................................................... 117 6.2.4. Access to Facilities, Controls and Utilities ... Error! Bookmark not defined. 6.2.5. Vehicular Access and Parking .......................................... 118 6.2.6. Impact on Cultural Heritage ............................................ 119 6.2.7. Visual Impacts and Aesthetics ......................................... 120 6.2.8. Occupational health and safety (OHS) .............................. 120 6.2.9. Community health and safety (CHS) ................................ 121 6.2.10. Accidents ............................. Error! Bookmark not defined. 6.3. POSSIBLE IMPACT ON TRANSBOUNDARY ENVIRONMENT ....... 125 6.4. CUMULATIVE IMPACTS ASSESSMENT ..................................... 125 VII. MITIGATION MEASUREMENTS ............................................................ 128 VIII. ENVIRONMENTAL AND SOCIAL MANAGEMENT .................................. 146 8.1. THE ENVIRONMENTAL AND SOCIAL MANAGEMENT PLAN ....... 146 8.2. SIGNIFICANCE OF ESMP .......................................................... 146 8.3. GRIEVANCE MECHANISM ............... Error! Bookmark not defined. 8.3.1. Grievance Administration by the Project ... Error! Bookmark not defined. IX. CONCLUSION ...................................................................................... 175 ANNEX........................................................................................................ 176 ANNEX 1: STAKEHOLDER ENGAGEMENT ........................................... 176 LITERATURE .............................................................................................. 199 Page | 4 LIST OF FIGURES Figure 1. Map of Gjirokastra region ............................................................... 25 Figure 2. Köppen-Geiger climate classification map for Albania . ................... 35 Figure 3. Average Annual Temperature for Gjirokastra .................................. 36 Figure 4. Monthly rainfall for Gjirokastra. ..................................................... 37 Figure 5. Geological Map of Gjirokastra and Geological Cross section ........... 41 Figure 6. Gjeomorphology and Stratigraphy of Gjirokastra Castle .................. 42 Figure 7. Map of geological risk of project area .............................................. 42 Figure 8. Hydrogeological map of the project area ......................................... 44 Figure 9. Noise monitoring in the city of Gjirokastra ...................................... 46 Figure 10. Active faults in the Gjirokastra site area and its vicinity ................ 47 Figure 11. Seismic macrozonation in Gjirokastra .......................................... 48 Figure 12. Map of Sa (0.2) and the Map of Seismic Hazard in Albania . .......... 50 Figure 13. Map of Protected area-Municipality of Gjirokastra ......................... 52 Figure 14. Vegetation in the project area (Sorbus domestica L.) ...................... 55 Figure 15. Vegetation in the project area (Robinia pseudoacacia L.) ................ 55 Figure 16. Vegetation in the project area (Querqus spp) ................................. 56 Figure 17. Vegetation in the project area
Recommended publications
  • Lista E Pasurive Kulturore Qarku Gjirokaster
    LISTA E MONUMENTEVE TË KULTURËS - QARKU GJIROKASTËR ADRESA TË DHËNA TË SHPALLJES NR. EMËRTIMI I MONUMENTIT KATEG. NJ. INSTITUCIONI/ LAGJJA FSHATI BASHKIA QARKU ADMINISTRATIVE NR. VENDIMIT/ DATA 1. Vendim i Institutit i Shkencave (botuar në Gazetën Zyrtare Nr. 95, dt. 16.10.1948); 2.Rektorati i Universitetit Shtetëror të Tiranës/ 1 KALAJA E GJIROKASTRËS I Gjirokastër Gjirokastër Gjirokastër nr. 6/ dt. 15.01.1963 3.Ministria e Arsimit dhe Kulturës/nr.1886/ dt.10.06.1973 1.Rektorati i Universitetit Shtetëror të Tiranës/ nr. 6/ dt. 15.01.1963 2 KALAJA E MELANIT I Nepravishtë Qender Libohove Libohovë Gjirokastër 2.Ministria e Arsimit dhe Kulturës/nr.1886/ dt.10.06.1973 1.Rektorati i Universitetit Shtetëror të Tiranës/ nr. 6/ dt. 15.01.1963 3 KALAJA E LABOVËS SË KRYQIT I Labovë e Kryqit Qender Libohove Libohove Gjirokastër 2.Ministria e Arsimit dhe Kulturës/nr.1886/ dt.10.06.1973 1.Rektorati i Universitetit Shtetëror të Tiranës/ nr. 6/ dt. 15.01.1963 4 KALAJA SELOS I Selo Dropull I Siperm Dropull Gjirokastër 2.Ministria e Arsimit dhe Kulturës/nr.1886/ dt.10.06.1973 1.Rektorati i Universitetit Shtetëror të Tiranës/ 5 KALAJA E SHTËPEZËS I Shtëpezë Picar Gjirokastër Gjirokastër nr. 6/ dt. 15.01.1963 2.Ministria e Arsimit dhe Kulturës/nr.1886/ dt.10.06.1973 1.Rektorati i Universitetit Shtetëror të Tiranës/ 6 KALAJA E JERMËS I Saraqinisht Antigone Gjirokastër Gjirokastër nr. 6/ dt. 15.01.1963 2.Ministria e Arsimit dhe Kulturës/nr.1886/ dt.10.06.1973 1.Rektorati i Universitetit Shtetëror të Tiranës/ 7 KALAJA E KARDHIQIT I Kardhiq Cepo Gjirokastër Gjirokastër nr.
    [Show full text]
  • Monumentet Qarku Gjirokaster
    LISTA E MONUMENTEVE TË KULTURËS - QARKU GJIROKASTËR ADRESA TË DHËNA TË SHPALLJES NR. EMËRTIMI I MONUMENTIT KATEG. NJ. INSTITUCIONI/ LAGJJA FSHATI BASHKIA QARKU ADMINISTRATIVE NR. VENDIMIT/ DATA 1. Vendim i Institutit i Shkencave (botuar në Gazetën Zyrtare Nr. 95, dt. 16.10.1948); 2.Rektorati i Universitetit Shtetëror të Tiranës/ 1 KALAJA E GJIROKASTRËS I Gjirokastër Gjirokastër Gjirokastër nr. 6/ dt. 15.01.1963 3.Ministria e Arsimit dhe Kulturës/nr.1886/ dt.10.06.1973 1.Rektorati i Universitetit Shtetëror të Tiranës/ nr. 6/ dt. 15.01.1963 2 KALAJA E MELANIT I Nepravishtë Qender Libohove Libohovë Gjirokastër 2.Ministria e Arsimit dhe Kulturës/nr.1886/ dt.10.06.1973 1.Rektorati i Universitetit Shtetëror të Tiranës/ nr. 6/ dt. 15.01.1963 3 KALAJA E LABOVËS SË KRYQIT I Labovë e Kryqit Qender Libohove Libohove Gjirokastër 2.Ministria e Arsimit dhe Kulturës/nr.1886/ dt.10.06.1973 1.Rektorati i Universitetit Shtetëror të Tiranës/ nr. 6/ dt. 15.01.1963 4 KALAJA SELOS I Selo Dropull I Siperm Dropull Gjirokastër 2.Ministria e Arsimit dhe Kulturës/nr.1886/ dt.10.06.1973 1.Rektorati i Universitetit Shtetëror të Tiranës/ 5 KALAJA E SHTËPEZËS I Shtëpezë Picar Gjirokastër Gjirokastër nr. 6/ dt. 15.01.1963 2.Ministria e Arsimit dhe Kulturës/nr.1886/ dt.10.06.1973 1.Rektorati i Universitetit Shtetëror të Tiranës/ 6 KALAJA E JERMËS I Saraqinisht Antigone Gjirokastër Gjirokastër nr. 6/ dt. 15.01.1963 2.Ministria e Arsimit dhe Kulturës/nr.1886/ dt.10.06.1973 1.Rektorati i Universitetit Shtetëror të Tiranës/ 7 KALAJA E KARDHIQIT I Kardhiq Cepo Gjirokastër Gjirokastër nr.
    [Show full text]
  • Krištín Paper.Indd
    Raptor Journal 2020, 14: 15 – 22. DOI: 10.2478/srj-2020-0004 © Raptor Protection of Slovakia (RPS) Diet of the lesser kestrel Falco naumanni at post-breeding roosts in southern Albania Potrava sokola bielopazúrového Falco naumanni na pohniezdnych nocľažiskách v južnom Albánsku Anton KRIŠTÍN, Tomáš BĚLKA, David HORAL & Taulant BINO Abstract: The lesser kestrel is an insectivorous and migratory falcon species, frequently using communal roosts in the post- breeding period in southern Europe. Using pellet analysis from two post-breeding roosting sites in southern Albania collected in August 2017, we identifi ed 1539 prey items belonging to approximately 58 prey species, 20 families and 7 orders in 110 pellets from two sites. Invertebrates made up the major part of the diet spectrum (PNI = 99.8 %, PFI = 100 %). Invertebrate prey body size varied between 8 and 62 mm (mean 28.1 mm). Bush-crickets (Tettigoniidae) and locusts (Acrididae) were the most abundant and frequent prey groups (PNI = 33 % resp. 48.6 % and PFI = 97 % resp. 94 %). Within the bush-cricket family we could identify the species of genera Tettigonia, Decticus, Platycleis, Isophya and Metrioptera. The species of genera Calliptamus, Stenobothrus and Locusta belonged among the locust species identifi ed in the food. Birds and mammals were found in pellets only occasionally. The prey composition was rather similar at both studied sites, while locusts (Acrididae) were more abundant at the Jorgucat site and bush-crickets (Tettigonioidea) at the Mollas site in the same time. Prey groups Scarabeidae beetles and other beetles (Coleoptera other) were more abundant and frequent at Mollas than at Jorgucat, and spiders were more frequent at Jorgucat.
    [Show full text]
  • Sustainability of the Karst Environment Dinaric Karst and Other Karst Regions
    The designations employed and the presentation of material throughout the publication do not imply the expression of any opinion whatsoever on the part of UNESCO concerning the legal status of any country, territory, city or area or of its authorities, or the delineation of its frontiers or boundaries. Published in 2010 by the United Nations Educational, Scientific and Cultural Organization 7, place de Fontenoy, 75352 Paris 07 SP Printed by UNESCO © UNESCO 2010 IHP-VII/2010/GW-2 SUSTAINABILITY OF THE KARST ENVIRONMENT DINARIC KARST AND OTHER KARST REGIONS International Interdisciplinary Scientific Conference (Plitvice Lakes, Croatia, 23-26 September 2009) Convened and Organised by: Centre for Karst (Gospi, Croatia) International Scientific Committee Ognjen Bonacci (Croatia), Chairman Franci Gabrovšek (Slovenia) Mladen Jurai (Croatia) Božidar Biondi (Croatia) Wolfgang Dreybrodt (Germany) Arthur Palmer (USA) Derek C. Ford (Canada) David Culver (USA) Andrej Mihevc (Slovenia) Jacques Mudry (France) Daoxian Yuan (China) Nico Goldscheider (Switzerland, Germany) Zoran Stevanovi (Serbia) Mario Parise (Italy) Hans Zojer (Austria) Elery Hamilton - Smith (Australia) Neven Kreši (USA) Bartolomé Andreo (Spain) Local Organizing Committee Jadranka Pejnovi, Chair Željko Župan, Secretary Ivo Lui Neven Boi Aleksandar Luki Ljudevit Tropan Dubravka Kljajo Krešimir ulinovi Ivica Tomljenovi Foreword The objective of the international interdisciplinary scientific conference “Sustainability of the karst environment - Dinaric karst and other karst regions”, organized by Centre for Karst, Gospi, Croatia, was to give a theoretical and practical contribution to the concept of sustainable development in karst regions, with a special emphasis on the experiences achieved in the Dinaric karst region. The exchange of information and findings obtained in other karst regions worldwide allows for an integral approach to this complex issue, and thereby contribute towards finding reliable solutions.
    [Show full text]
  • Albania: Average Precipitation for December
    MA016_A1 Kelmend Margegaj Topojë Shkrel TRO PO JË S Shalë Bujan Bajram Curri Llugaj MA LËSI Lekbibaj Kastrat E MA DH E KU KË S Bytyç Fierzë Golaj Pult Koplik Qendër Fierzë Shosh S HK O D Ë R HAS Krumë Inland Gruemirë Water SHK OD RË S Iballë Body Postribë Blerim Temal Fajza PUK ËS Gjinaj Shllak Rrethina Terthorë Qelëz Malzi Fushë Arrëz Shkodër KUK ËSI T Gur i Zi Kukës Rrapë Kolsh Shkodër Qerret Qafë Mali ´ Ana e Vau i Dejës Shtiqen Zapod Pukë Malit Berdicë Surroj Shtiqen 20°E 21°E Created 16 Dec 2019 / UTC+01:00 A1 Map shows the average precipitation for December in Albania. Map Document MA016_Alb_Ave_Precip_Dec Settlements Borders Projection & WGS 1984 UTM Zone 34N B1 CAPITAL INTERNATIONAL Datum City COUNTIES Tiranë C1 MUNICIPALITIES Albania: Average Produced by MapAction ADMIN 3 mapaction.org Precipitation for D1 0 2 4 6 8 10 [email protected] Precipitation (mm) December kilometres Supported by Supported by the German Federal E1 Foreign Office. - Sheet A1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Data sources 7 8 9 0 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 0 1 2 - - - 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 2 2 2 The depiction and use of boundaries, names and - - - - - - - - - - - - - F1 .1 .1 .1 GADM, SRTM, OpenStreetMap, WorldClim 0 0 0 .1 .1 .1 .1 .1 .1 .1 .1 .1 .1 .1 .1 .1 associated data shown here do not imply 6 7 8 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 9 0 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 0 1 endorsement or acceptance by MapAction.
    [Show full text]
  • Pakistan Journal of Botany
    See discussions, stats, and author profiles for this publication at: https://www.researchgate.net/publication/313842333 RELIGIOUS DIFFERENCES AFFECT ORCHID DIVERSITY OF ALBANIAN GRAVEYARDS Article · February 2017 CITATIONS READS 4 142 7 authors, including: Attila Molnár V. Zoltán Barina University of Debrecen Hungarian Natural History Museum 157 PUBLICATIONS 610 CITATIONS 64 PUBLICATIONS 361 CITATIONS SEE PROFILE SEE PROFILE Gábor Sramkó Jácint Tökölyi Hungarian Academy of Sciences University of Debrecen 92 PUBLICATIONS 495 CITATIONS 43 PUBLICATIONS 284 CITATIONS SEE PROFILE SEE PROFILE Some of the authors of this publication are also working on these related projects: Hydra Eco-Evo-Devo View project NKFIH K-119225 - How can plant ecology support grassland restoration? View project All content following this page was uploaded by Attila Molnár V. on 19 February 2017. The user has requested enhancement of the downloaded file. Pak. J. Bot., 49(1): 289-303, 2017. RELIGIOUS DIFFERENCES AFFECT ORCHID DIVERSITY OF ALBANIAN GRAVEYARDS ATTILA MOLNÁR V.1,2*, ATTILA TAKÁCS1,2, EDVÁRD MIZSEI3, VIKTOR LÖKI1, ZOLTÁN BARINA4, GÁBOR SRAMKÓ1,2 AND JÁCINT TÖKÖLYI5 1Department of Botany, University of Debrecen, Egyetem tér 1., H-4032, Debrecen, Hungary 2MTA-DE “Lendület” Evolutionary Phylogenomics Research Group, University of Debrecen, Egyetem tér 1., H-4032, Debrecen, Hungary 3Department of Evolutionary Zoology, University of Debrecen, Egyetem tér 1., H-4032, Debrecen, Hungary 4Department of Botany, Hungarian Natural History Museum, H-1431 Budapest, Pf. 137, Hungary 5MTA-DE “Lendület” Behavioural Ecology Research Group, University of Debrecen, Egyetem tér 1., H-4032, Debrecen, Hungary *Corresponding author’s email: [email protected], Phone: +36-52-/512-900/62648 ext.
    [Show full text]
  • Bashkia Dropull.Pdf
    PLANI OPERACIONAL i Zhvillimit Vendor Bashkia Dropull PB Bashkia Dropull Plani Operacional i Zhvillimit Vendor 1 Mars, 2016 Përgatitur nga: Akademia e Studimeve Politike 2 Bashkia Dropull Plani Operacional i Zhvillimit Vendor 3 Tabela e Përmbajtjes 1. Nevoja për një Plan Operacional për Investime 4 2. Plani operacional afatshkurtër në perspektivën e qeverisjes lokale dhe proceseve planifikuese 6 3. Metodologjia për përgatitjen e POZHL 8 4. Diagnoza 10 4.2 Zhvillimi ekonomik 10 4.3 Mirëqënia ekonomike dhe sociale 13 4.4 Burimet natyrore dhe qëndrueshmëria mjedisore 15 4.5 Konkluzione 15 5.Përcaktimi i problemeve dhe prioriteteve operacionale afat-shkurtra duke përfshirë pemën e problemeve 16 5.1 Pema e problemeve 17 5.2 Plani operacional 20 6. Vizioni strategjik 32 7. Harta dhe foto 33 8. Anekse 35 2 Bashkia Dropull Plani Operacional i Zhvillimit Vendor 3 Nevoja për një Plan Operacional 1. të Investimit Projekti i hartimit të Planit Operacional të Zhvillimit Lokal (POZHL) u iniciua nga Mi- nistri i Shtetit për Çështjet Vendore në bashkëpunim me projektin STAR, të menaxhuar nga UNDP. Projekti STAR ka ardhur si një reagim i menjëhershëm i mbështetjes që donatorë të ndryshëm ofruan për Qeverinë në përpjekjet e ndërmara për zbatimin e reformës admini- strative territoriale. Hartimi i POZHL rezulton si sfidë kryesore dhe nevojë imediate për të patur një plan të integruar të veprimeve dhe masave që bashkia e re duhet të marrë, për të si- guruar kohezionin administrativ dhe territorial të të gjitha njësive administrative të saj, pas reformës territoriale. Sigurimi i kohezionit administrativ dhe territorial kërkon masa dhe veprime që mund të përfshijnë ristrukturimin administrativ, të shërbimeve administrative dhe shërbimeve publike, të infrastrukturës lidhëse të njësive administrative etj.
    [Show full text]
  • The Classification of Rural Settlements in Gjirokastra Region
    E-ISSN 2281-4612 Academic Journal of Interdisciplinary Studies Vol 5 No 3 S1 ISSN 2281-3993 MCSER Publishing, Rome-Italy December 2016 The Classification of Rural Settlements in Gjirokastra Region Assoc. Prof. Albina Sinani Department of Geography, Faculty of Education and Social Sciences, “Eqrem Çabej” University Gjirokaster 6001, Albania; *[email protected] Doi:10.5901/ajis.2016.v5n3s1p24 Abstract The network of residential areas in the region of Gjirokastra has changed depending of a complex factors. This has affected to the utilization rate of the region's rural territories. Considering the economic orientation of rural settlements by relief factor, we look that in settlements that lie in the landscape field, dominates this main branch of the economy: agriculture, livestock, processing of agricultural and livestock products and trade. In settlements that lie in low relief and high montane prevail livestock and orchards, while in the mountainous terrain of petty farming prevails (in villages of municipalities Picar, Cepo, Pogon and Frashër). To achieve this classification serves the real estate registry, which contains books of plots, with surfaces by categories (arable land, orchard, vineyards, forests, pastures, unproductive land). Until 1990, social-economic factor determining in order to limit the application of the regulatory policies of rural settlements. The old system aimed the limiting of the occupation of agricultural land and increasing population density in the rural area. After 1990 have not been implemented proper policies for the development of rural areas. Gjirokastra region rural areas have outstanding value to the organization as space and landscape, as well as the architecture and internal organization of housing and other buildings, infrastructure etc.
    [Show full text]
  • And-Thrust Belt
    VU Research Portal Isotope analysis of fluid inclusions de Graaf, S. 2018 document version Publisher's PDF, also known as Version of record Link to publication in VU Research Portal citation for published version (APA) de Graaf, S. (2018). Isotope analysis of fluid inclusions: Into subsurface fluid flow and coral calcification. General rights Copyright and moral rights for the publications made accessible in the public portal are retained by the authors and/or other copyright owners and it is a condition of accessing publications that users recognise and abide by the legal requirements associated with these rights. • Users may download and print one copy of any publication from the public portal for the purpose of private study or research. • You may not further distribute the material or use it for any profit-making activity or commercial gain • You may freely distribute the URL identifying the publication in the public portal ? Take down policy If you believe that this document breaches copyright please contact us providing details, and we will remove access to the work immediately and investigate your claim. E-mail address: [email protected] Download date: 01. Oct. 2021 Chapter Fluid flow evolution in the Albanide fold- 3 and-thrust belt ectonic forces generated during thrust emplacement along active margins may drive complex fluid flow patterns in fold-and-thrust belts and foreland basins. In the Albanide fold-and-thrust belt, fracture-controlled fluid flow Tled to the development of calcite vein networks in a sequence of naturally fractured Cretaceous to Eocene carbonate rocks. Fluid inclusion isotope data of these calcite veins demonstrate that fluids circulating in the carbonates were derived from an underlying reservoir that consisted of a mixture of meteoric water and evolved marine fluids, probably sourced from deep-seated evaporites.
    [Show full text]
  • Bilingual Areas Within the Territory of the Republic of Albania
    ISSN 2601-8616 (print) European Journal of May-August 2018 ISSN 2601-8624 (online) Education Volume 1, Issue 2 Bilingual Areas within the Territory of the Republic of Albania Dr. Migena Balla University “Ismail Qemali” Vlore, Albania Abstract Due to historical, territorial, cultural and social relationships with other countries of the Balkans, various linguistic “islands” have been formed within the Albanian land, which are typically, although not exclusively, to be found in border regions. In these communities, not only do we find bilingualism, but also diglossia resulting in the emergence of some linguistic phenomena such as code-switching, code-mixing, borrowings, etc. These linguistic islands have different geographical expansion ranging from an entire region, a particular village, to a specific neighbourhood, perhaps. The present paper will attempt to make an accurate overview of these zones, which will mainly be focused on issues that have to do with their locations, linguistic contacts with the Albanian language, number of bilingual speakers, etc. Keywords: linguistic “islands”, bilingualism, diglossia, bilingual speakers Introduction The most prominent sociolinguistic researches on languages in contact have been made by reputed authors of the sociolinguistics domain at present, such as Weinreich and Feguson, who have also provided a broad theoretical framework about this phenomenon1. In Albanian sociolinguistics, studies on different diglossic and bilingual situations have been sporadic and subject of particular communities in certain geographical areas of Albania.2 As a lecturer of this discipline, I was constantly perplexed by the idea of conducting a thorough study of all the issues related to the Albanian language being in contact and coexisting with other languages.
    [Show full text]
  • Dwelling and Living Conditions
    Swiss Agency for Development and Cooperation SDC ALBANIA DWELLING AND LIVING CONDITIONS M a y, 2 0 1 4 ALBANIA DWELLING AND LIVING CONDITIONS Preface and Acknowledgment May, 2014 The 2011 Population and Housing Census of Albania is the 11th census performed in the history of Director of the Publication: Albania. The preparation and implementation of this commitment required a significant amount Gjergji FILIPI, PhD of financial and human resources. For this INSTAT has benefitted by the support of the Albanian government, the European Union and international donors. The methodology was based on the EUROSTAT and UN recommendations for the 2010 Population and Housing Censuses, taking into INSTAT consideration the specific needs of data users of Albania. Ledia Thomo Anisa Omuri In close cooperation with international donors, INSTAT has initiated a deeper analysis process in Ruzhdie Bici the census data, comparing them with other administrative indicators or indicators from different Eriona Dhamo surveys. The deepened analysis of Population and Housing Census 2011 will serve in the future to better understand and interpret correctly the Albanian society features. The information collected by TECHNICAL ASSISTENCE census is multidimensional and the analyses express several novelties like: Albanian labour market Juna Miluka and its structure, emigration dynamics, administrative division typology, population projections Kozeta Sevrani and the characteristics of housing and dwelling conditions. The series of these publications presents a new reflection on the situation of the Albanian society, helping to understand the way to invest in the infrastructure, how to help local authorities through Copyright © INSTAT 2014 urbanization phenomena, taking in account the pace of population growth in the future, or how to address employment market policies etc.
    [Show full text]
  • DESIGN and SUPERVISION GJIROKASTRA SYSTEM of MUSEUMS ‐ MUNICIPALITY of GJIROKASTRA Project ID Number: P15562 / REF No: AL‐ADF‐15556‐CS‐CQS
    DESIGN AND SUPERVISION GJIROKASTRA SYSTEM OF MUSEUMS ‐ MUNICIPALITY OF GJIROKASTRA Project ID Number: P15562 / REF No: AL‐ADF‐15556‐CS‐CQS TASK 4: System of Museums (SoM) Detailed Project Design | APRIL 2020 ENVIRONMENTAL AND SOCIAL IMPACT ASSESSMENT casanova+hernandez architects | Cultural Heritage without Borders EVRIRONMENTAL AND SOCIAL IMPACT ASSESSMENT SYSTEM OF MUSEUMS (SoM) TABLE OF CONTENTS (Referred to DCM no. 686, date 29.07.2015 “On the development of the EIA procedure). 2. DESCRIPTION OF THE GREENSPACES NEAR THE PROPOSED PROJECT. ....................... 30 3. INFORMATION ABOUT WATER RESOURCES NEAR THE PROJECT. .............................. 41 4. IDENTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE NEGATIVE ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACTS. ..................... 42 5. DESCRIPTION OF POSSIBLE ENVIRONMENTAL DISCHARGES. ..................................... 47 6. INFORMATION ON POSSIBLE DURATION OF NEGATIVE IMPACTS. ............................ 48 7. SPATIAL EXPANSION OF NEGATIVE IMPACT ON THE ENVIRONMENT OF THE AREA .. 49 8. REHABILITATION OF THE IMPACTED ENVIRONMENT AND THE POSSIBILITY OF ITS RESTORATION TO THE PREVIOUS SITUATION. .................................................................. 49 9. POSSIBLE MEASURES TO AVOID AND MITIGATE NEGATIVE ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACTS. ................................................................................................................................. 49 10. POSSIBLE TRANSBOUNDARY IMPACTS. ..................................................................... 53 i | Faqe ENVIRONMENTAL AND SOCIAL IMPACT ASSESSMENT
    [Show full text]