004 Second Report Submitted by Albania

Total Page:16

File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

004 Second Report Submitted by Albania Strasbourg, 18 May 2007 ACFC/SR/II(2007)004 SECOND REPORT SUBMITTED BY ALBANIA PURSUANT TO ARTICLE 25, PARAGRAPH 1 OF THE FRAMEWORK CONVENTION FOR THE PROTECTION OF NATIONAL MINORITIES Received on 18 May 2007 TABLE OF CONTENT INTRODUCTORY REMARKS ............................................................................ 4 POLICY OF THE ALBANIAN STATE TOWARDS RESPECT OF MINORITY RIGHTS ....................................................................................................................... 6 GENERAL VIEW ON THE MEASURES TAKEN FOR IMPLEMENTATION OF THE COMMITTEE OF MINISTERS’ RESOLUTION..................................................... 9 I - MEASURES TAKEN TO PUBLICIZE THE RESULTS OF THE FIRST MONITORING CYCLE .................................................................................... 14 MEASURES TAKEN FOR THE PUBLICATION OF THE FIRST MONITORING CYCLE RESULTS AND FOR INCREASING AWARENESS REGARDING THE FRAMEWORK CONVENTION ......................................................................... 14 CIVIL SOCIETY PARTICIPATION IN THE PROCESS OF IMPLEMENTATION OF THE FRAMEWORK CONVENTION AT NATIONAL AND LOCAL LEVELS............ 20 DIALOGUE WITH THE ADVISORY COMMITTEE......................................................... 24 II – MEASURES UNDERTAKEN IN THE IMPLEMENTATION OF THE RESOLUTION OF THE MINISTERS COMMITTEE IN APPLYING THE FRAMEWORK CONVENTION ON “PROTECTION OF NATIONAL MINORITIES” FROM ALBANIA (COMMENTS TO CERTAIN ARTICLES OF THE FRAMEWORK CONVENTION)............................................................................................... 25 ARTICLE 1 ....................................................................................................... 25 ARTICLE 2 ....................................................................................................... 26 ARTICLE 4 ....................................................................................................... 27 ARTICLE 5 ....................................................................................................... 38 ARTICLE 6....................................................................................................... 41 ARTICLE 7 ....................................................................................................... 48 ARTICLE 8 ....................................................................................................... 49 ARTICLE 9 ....................................................................................................... 50 ARTICLE 10 ..................................................................................................... 56 ARTICLE 11 ..................................................................................................... 57 ARTICLE 12 ..................................................................................................... 59 ARTICLE 13 ..................................................................................................... 64 ARTICLE 14 ..................................................................................................... 65 ARTICLE 15 ..................................................................................................... 67 III. ANSWERS TO THE ADVISORY COMMITTEE QUESTIONNAIRE.................. 80 ANNEXES (available as a separate document) • Statistical data on minorities in Albania (information from INSTAT). • Statistical archive data on the size of minorities in Albania. • The strategy “For the improvement of the Living Conditions for the Roma Minority” • Decision of the Council of Ministers for the constitution of the Committee on Minorities • Decision on the amendment of the Decision of the Council of Ministers for the constitution of the State Committee on Minorities • Memorandum of cooperation with local government unit • Questionnaire of the Advisory Committee of the Framework Convention (questionnaire filled out by NGOs) Thoughts and opinions of minority’ associations: • Material submitted by the “Amaro Drom” Association • Material submitted by the “Moraça – Rozafa” Association • Material submitted by the “Aromanians of Albania” Association Information from civil society 1. Albanian Helsinki Committee (AHC) • AHC experience in the field of respect for minority rights 2. Human Development and Promotion Center • Economical development in the minority areas – comparative study case • Media coverage of the parliamentary elections 2005 and minorities Information and documents from different international organizations 1. Information from UNDP • Activities of the United Nations Development Program (UNDP) in support of minorities in Albania 2. Information from UNICEF • Matrix on the support to minority projects in Albania as well as counter trafficking (in English) 2005 – 2006 3. SOROS Foundation • Executive summary on the report for the implementation of the national strategy “For the improvement of the living conditions of the Roma minority” • List of different projects regarding minorities during the period 2000 – 2004 Introductory remarks The Framework Convention for the Protection of National Minorities (further referred to as the Framework Convention) was signed by the Republic of Albania (further referred to as Albania) on 29 June 1995 and entered into force on 1 January 2000. Based on article 25 paragraph 1 of the Framework Convention, the Government of Albania submitted its first state report on 26 July 2001. This Report reflects the basic guidelines of Albanian State policy regarding the protection of minority rights in Albania. It also contains information on the legislative and other measures taken to give effect to the principles set out in the Framework Convention. These measures and their level of implementation were assessed by the Advisory Committee of the Framework Convention (further referred to as the Advisory Committee) on the basis of the First State report, submitted by Albanian authorities, as well as on the information gathered during its visit to Albania in May 20021. The Advisory Committee adopted its Opinion on Albania at its 15th meeting on 12 September 2002. This Opinion was subsequently made public by Albanian authorities. The Government of Albania submitted its written comments on the opinion of the Advisory Committee in February 2003. These comments were the outcome of dialogue and consultation among representatives of civil society, minority associations and state bodies responsible for minority issues in Albania. After examining the Advisory Committee’s opinion and the written comments of the Government of Albania, the Committee of Ministers of the Council of Europe (further referred to as the Committee of Ministers) adopted the Resolution ResCMN (2005) 2 on the implementation of the Framework Convention by Albania. The Opinion2 and the Resolution point out that in many respects, Albania has made commendable efforts for the implementation of the Framework Convention, but also identified areas where improvements could be made. 1 From April the 9th till May the 3rd, 2002, the Advisory Committee of the “Framework Convention for the Protection of National minorities” of the Council of Europe has visited Albania in the framework of this report examination and to receive further information on the application of this Convention. 2 Opinion of the Advisory Committee of the Framework Convention on the Protection of National Minorities, General Remarks, page 1, paragraph 2. Resolution ResCMN (2005)2 on the implementation of the Framework Convention on the Protection of National Minorities, by Albania, point 1, paragraph 1 of the Conclusions. In September 2005, the Ministry of Foreign Affairs in cooperation with the Council of Europe, organized the follow-up meeting for the evaluation of the implementation of the Framework Convention for the Protection of National Minorities by Albania. This meeting concluded the first monitoring cycle for Albania. In accordance with Resolution (97)10 of the Committee of the Ministers, the Second State Report on the implementation of the Framework Convention by Albania should have been submitted on 1 January 2006. Aiming to avoid the overlapping of competencies of the structures that deal with minorities’ issues in Albania, the new government3 undertook a reorganizing process of these structures. This process influenced the delay in drafting and submitting the Second Report by Albania. In a letter4 from the Deputy Minister of Foreign Affairs addressed to the President of the Advisory Committee, Albanian authorities shared the reasons for the delay and requested to postpone the timeframe to submit the report. They also confirmed the serious commitment of the Albanian Government to submitting the report in the shortest time possible. The Advisory Committee, replying to the request of the Albanian party appreciated the efforts of Albanian authorities to comply with the commitments deriving from the Framework Convention, and also expressing understanding for the delay in submitting the Second Report by Albania. In this context we would like to mention that the delay in submitting the second report by Albania, in addition to the reasons set out in the above mentioned letter, was also caused by the postponement for several times of the adoption of the Committee of Ministers Resolution on Albania, adopted on 11 May 20055. The second official report by Albania was drafted in accordance with the outline for state reports to be submitted under the second monitoring cycle, in conformity with article 25 paragraph 1 of
Recommended publications
  • Archaeology and Economy in the Ancient World, Bd. 39; Boundaries
    Sacred places, territorial economy and cultural identity in northern Epirus (Chaonia) Nadia Aleotti – Anna Gamberini – Lorenzo Mancini* Until the late Classical period, Chaonia, the northernmost part of Epirus corresponding to nowadays southern Albania, is clearly differentiated in two cultural units: the coastal areas that borders with Thesprotia, falling from the end of the th7 century BC into the peiraia of Corcyra, and the ‘indigenous’ districts of the interior (fig. 1). If the belonging of the Chaonians to Greek culture and ethnicity could hardly be denied by present scholarship, the literary sources of Classical times regarded them as barbarians.1 This ‘peripheral’ connotation, even if depending on a sort of cultural and geographical prejudice, seems to find a parallel in the archaeological record concerning the sacred landscape.2 Earliest attestations of worship come from Butrint, part of the Archaic Corcyreanpeiraia , where an inscribed potsherd found in a votive deposit in 1938 points to the existence of a cult of Athena as early as the 6th century BC, possibly related to a monumental temple, located, according to a recent hypothesis, on the acropolis hill.3 Apart from this early case, the development of a full-fledged religious architecture among the native tribes can be traced as far back as the 4th century BC, occurring in most cases only in the Hellenistic age. It is the period when new fortified centres, featuring in some instances a real urban layout and a Hellenistic-like monumental equipment, make their appearance beside the traditional network of komai. The new centralised settlement pattern, with main centre-poleis (Phoinike and Antigonea) and their gravitating system of minor settlements bordering territories well defined also from a geomorphologic point of view, even if not unknown to the other Epirote ethne, seems to have been particularly familiar with the Chaonians,4 conditioning the spatial distribution of the cults as well.
    [Show full text]
  • Joint Initiatives Ecsra and Cso's in Rural/Remote Areas
    1 2 ECSRA Empowering Civil Society in Rural Areas Book of achievements 3 4 Table of contents I. About the ECSRA project ........................................................................ 7 1.1 Project background and objectives ..................................................... 7 1.2 Project Activities ............................................................................. 8 1.3 Process .......................................................................................... 9 1.4 Actors and Supporters of the Initiative (at the local/county level) ........... 10 II. The context of areas targeted by the project ........................................... 11 2.1 Socio-economic context in the targeted areas ................................. 11 Berat ................................................................................................ 11 Elbasan ............................................................................................ 12 Gjirokastra ....................................................................................... 13 Lezha ............................................................................................... 14 2.2 Target groups and beneficiaries .....................................................16 2.2.a Focus on rural and peripheral areas ........................................... 16 2.2.b Challenges in empowering citizens & encouraging good governance ....................................................................................... 17 2.3 Intervention strategy and ECSRA
    [Show full text]
  • Western Balkans Stability Monitor
    Western Balkans Stability Monitor December 2018 Issue* * The issue is published in December and primarily covers issues occurring in the previous month. Table of contents Regional Overview 4 Albania 6 Government Stability 7 Opposition Activities 7 Regional Relations 8 Security 9 Looking Forward 10 Bosnia-Herzegovina 11 Government Stability 12 Opposition Activities 14 Regional Relations 15 Security 16 Looking Forward 17 Kosovo 18 Government Stability 19 Opposition Activities 20 Regional Relations 21 Security 23 Looking Forward 24 Macedonia 25 Government Stability 26 Opposition Activities 27 Regional Relations 29 Security 30 Looking Forward 31 2 Montenegro 32 Government Stability 33 Opposition Activities 34 Regional Relations 35 Security 36 Looking Forward 37 Serbia 38 Government stability 39 Opposition activities 40 Regional relations 41 Security 42 Looking Forward 43 About Risk Dimensions 44 War 44 Terrorism 44 Government Instability 44 Civil Unrest 44 Ethnic Unrest 44 About 45 Contact 45 3 Regional Overview Instability across the region remained unevenly spread over the last month in the Western Balkans. While most of the countries of the region remained broadly stable, Bosnia-Herzegovina and Kosovo set themselves apart as pockets of real – or possible – instability. In the case of Bosnia, the risk of instability largely derived from the post-election challenge of forming ruling coalitions at different levels of government. The process of ethnic coalition building can be challenging enough at the best of times. However, this time around it is compounded by the lack of a legal basis for forming part of the Federation entity’s Parliament (the upper House of Peoples), without which the Federation entity government cannot be formed.
    [Show full text]
  • Reconciliation of Revenues Received by the Municipality of Patos from Royalty Payments and the Administration of Funds for the Benefits of the Community in 2012
    Reconciliation of revenues received by the Municipality of Patos from royalty payments and the administration of funds for the benefits of the community in 2012 Municipality of Patos Albania EITI Secretariat 2015 September 9 Table 1 Comparison between local The Economy government budgetary funds and funds received by Royalty Budget Royalty Table 2 Legislation Local Units beneficiary of Royalty in a. Laws for royalty 2012-2013 b. Guidelines of Ministry of Finance Table 3 Content c. Percentage of the Royalty according to Information and data reported by the classification for Hydro-Carbon Sector Municipality of Patos Executive overview Patos Municipality Contribution of extractive industry to Albania Table 4 Economy Communes near the area Information and data reported by Commune of Mbrostar Contribution of Royalty by extractive areas Geography Demography Control over the use of Royalty funds Culture and Sport _________________________________________ Conclusions Albania EITI Secretariat _________________________________________ Recommendations The accomplishment of this task is carried out ○ The Royalty funds collected and delivered by in accordance with the competences given to the Ministry of Finance have been identified EITI Albania on the collection and processing for the whole country and in particular for of data and official information for Patos Municipality. reconciliation of the income received from royalty fund and the administration of these ○ On-site verification on the administration of royalty funds given to Patos Municipality based funds delivered to Patos Municipality in 2012 on law procedures, rules and the relevant The main objective is the verification of the projects approved to the benefit of the Pursuant to tasks arising from the MSG delivery process of the Royalty funds and the community in the extractive industry areas.
    [Show full text]
  • Monumentet Qarku Gjirokaster
    LISTA E MONUMENTEVE TË KULTURËS - QARKU GJIROKASTËR ADRESA TË DHËNA TË SHPALLJES NR. EMËRTIMI I MONUMENTIT KATEG. NJ. INSTITUCIONI/ LAGJJA FSHATI BASHKIA QARKU ADMINISTRATIVE NR. VENDIMIT/ DATA 1. Vendim i Institutit i Shkencave (botuar në Gazetën Zyrtare Nr. 95, dt. 16.10.1948); 2.Rektorati i Universitetit Shtetëror të Tiranës/ 1 KALAJA E GJIROKASTRËS I Gjirokastër Gjirokastër Gjirokastër nr. 6/ dt. 15.01.1963 3.Ministria e Arsimit dhe Kulturës/nr.1886/ dt.10.06.1973 1.Rektorati i Universitetit Shtetëror të Tiranës/ nr. 6/ dt. 15.01.1963 2 KALAJA E MELANIT I Nepravishtë Qender Libohove Libohovë Gjirokastër 2.Ministria e Arsimit dhe Kulturës/nr.1886/ dt.10.06.1973 1.Rektorati i Universitetit Shtetëror të Tiranës/ nr. 6/ dt. 15.01.1963 3 KALAJA E LABOVËS SË KRYQIT I Labovë e Kryqit Qender Libohove Libohove Gjirokastër 2.Ministria e Arsimit dhe Kulturës/nr.1886/ dt.10.06.1973 1.Rektorati i Universitetit Shtetëror të Tiranës/ nr. 6/ dt. 15.01.1963 4 KALAJA SELOS I Selo Dropull I Siperm Dropull Gjirokastër 2.Ministria e Arsimit dhe Kulturës/nr.1886/ dt.10.06.1973 1.Rektorati i Universitetit Shtetëror të Tiranës/ 5 KALAJA E SHTËPEZËS I Shtëpezë Picar Gjirokastër Gjirokastër nr. 6/ dt. 15.01.1963 2.Ministria e Arsimit dhe Kulturës/nr.1886/ dt.10.06.1973 1.Rektorati i Universitetit Shtetëror të Tiranës/ 6 KALAJA E JERMËS I Saraqinisht Antigone Gjirokastër Gjirokastër nr. 6/ dt. 15.01.1963 2.Ministria e Arsimit dhe Kulturës/nr.1886/ dt.10.06.1973 1.Rektorati i Universitetit Shtetëror të Tiranës/ 7 KALAJA E KARDHIQIT I Kardhiq Cepo Gjirokastër Gjirokastër nr.
    [Show full text]
  • Albanian Borders at the Margins of Europe Gilles De Rapper
    The High Wall and the Narrow Gate: Albanian Borders at the Margins of Europe Gilles de Rapper To cite this version: Gilles de Rapper. The High Wall and the Narrow Gate: Albanian Borders at the Margins of Eu- rope. 10th biennial EASA conference, ”Experiencing diversity and mutuality”, Aug 2008, Ljubljana, Slovenia. halshs-00343516 HAL Id: halshs-00343516 https://halshs.archives-ouvertes.fr/halshs-00343516 Submitted on 1 Dec 2008 HAL is a multi-disciplinary open access L’archive ouverte pluridisciplinaire HAL, est archive for the deposit and dissemination of sci- destinée au dépôt et à la diffusion de documents entific research documents, whether they are pub- scientifiques de niveau recherche, publiés ou non, lished or not. The documents may come from émanant des établissements d’enseignement et de teaching and research institutions in France or recherche français ou étrangers, des laboratoires abroad, or from public or private research centers. publics ou privés. Paper presented at the 10th biennial EASA conference, Experiencing diversity and mutuality, Ljubljana, 26-29 August, 2008 (Workshop 047, “The New Europe: The Politics of Recognition, Inclusion and Exclusion”). THE HIGH WALL AND THE NARROW GATE: ALBANIAN BORDERS AT THE MARGINS OF EUROPE Gilles de Rapper My paper is an attempt to understand the impact of changes in the borderland between Greece and Albanian after 1991. More precisely, I would like to relate the recent success of some “ideas” about the ancient past of the area with the state of social relations between Albanians and Greeks as experienced by local inhabitants of the borderland. Established in 1913 as a boundary between two national states, the Greek-Albanian border came to separate two geopolitical camps during the Cold War and became an external border of Europe in 1981 when Greece joined the European Community.
    [Show full text]
  • 1167821.En Pe 629.960
    Question for written answer P-005565/2018 to the Commission Rule 130 Eleftherios Synadinos (NI) Subject: Ethnic Greek European citizen executed by Albanian police On 28 October, Greek National Day, commemorating the refusal of Greece to acquiesce in the savagery of other European states, its resistance to the massive Nazi offensive and its victory in Northern Epirus, Konstantinos Katsifas, an ethnic Greek, was gunned down by the Albanian authorities under circumstances that as yet remain unclear. It appears that the shooting occurred after he had raised a Greek flag at the Greek military cemetery during the official annual celebration held by Greek residents in the village of Bularat in Gjirokastër, some six kilometres from the border with Greece. It is here that those who fell during the epic struggle on the Albanian front are buried1 2. A political organisation representing the Greek ethnic minority in Albania has accused the Albanian police of carrying out a ‘coldblooded execution’ and of disregarding established procedures. It also complains of a wave of anti-Greek propaganda and a growing undercurrent of hostility towards the ethnic Greek minority3. In view of this: 1. Will the Commission launch an impartial investigation into what was effectively a breach of the human rights of a European citizen, in view of the EU-Albania accession negotiations? 2. Given that the Protocol of Corfu, which was ratified but not implemented, was never annulled by a subsequent agreement, will the Commission include it in the accession negotiations, underlining the need to ensure good neighbourly relations, with a view to upholding the rights of the Greek minority in Albania? 3.
    [Show full text]
  • The Lost Caves of Luigi Cardini: Explorations in Albania 1930-2001
    3/20/12 Relocating the Caves of Luigi Cardini The Lost Caves of Luigi Cardini: Explorations in Albania 1930-2001 Karen Francis, Institute of World Archaeology, University of East Anglia, Norwich, NR4 7TJ. email: [email protected] When referencing this article, please use the following convention: Francis, K. 2001. The Lost Caves of Luigi Cardini: Explorations in Albania 1930-2001 Capra 3 available at - http://capra.group.shef.ac.uk/3/cardini.html Introduction In June 2000, a team of archaeologists from the Institute of World Archaeology, UK, and the Albanian Institute of Archaeology began a field survey in southern Albania. The aim of the project was to re-locate a number of "lost" prehistoric caves and surface sites that were first explored in the 1930s by an Italian archaeologist, Luigi Cardini. In 1930, the director of the Italian Archaeological Mission to Albania, Luigi Maria Ugolini, recruited Cardini as the mission's prehistorian. Between 1930 and 1939, Cardini travelled extensively throughout south-western Albania and, with the help of a few dedicated Albanian guides, mapped and recorded over 60 natural caves and rockshelters. Under Cardini's supervision, Albanian workmen carried out trial excavations within some of the most promising caves, revealing evidence of human occupation dating from early prehistory to Roman times. Cardini also identified a number of surface sites close to the seashore, where concentrations of Middle Palaeolithic stone tools provided evidence of Neanderthal activity. Cardini’s discoveries, particularly that of a Palaeolithic open-air site at Xarra, close to the southern border with Greece, represent a major part of our current knowledge of Albanian prehistory today.
    [Show full text]
  • Military Review
    TRAINING AND DOCTRINE COMMAND MILITARY REVIEW Security and Defence Review Training and Doctrine Command First Edition, January 2013 Tirana, January 2013 1 Editorial Board of Military Review Publication Approved by the Order of the Minister of Defense No. 1721, dated 10/10/2012 Editorial Board Chairman B.G. Bardhyl Hoxha Members Col. Ahmet Leka Col. Dr. Agim Q. Sula M.G. ® Prof. Dr. Ruzhdi Gjatoja M.G. ® Prof. Dr. Kostaq Karoli Col.® Prof. Dr. Pëllumb Danaj Col. ® Thimi Hudhra Editor in chief Ajet Nuellari Editor Silvana Markgjonaj English Translation Jaup Zenuni Endrit Kokona Eva Reveli Piro Tanku Renalda Manushi Ornela Shametaj Art design Teuta Mullisi ISSH 2227-8133 (Print), ISSN 2227-8141 (Online) Copyright © 2012 All rights reserved. The Centre for Doctrine (CD) of the Albanian Training and Doctrine Command. The views and opinions expressed in this Military Review are of the authors and do not necessarily represent the official policies or positions of the Ministry of Defence, General Staff and Training and Doctrine Command. The authors of Military Review articles will not be subject to punishment for free expression of individual views and positions even if they are not in line with the official positions of the defence institution. The authors are also responsible for any slander actions, distortions of facts, offense and plagiarism aspects to the creativity and thoughts of other authors. This edition of Military Review is found on the website http://www.tradoc.mil.al/ In case you can not get the information you need on the Internet, please apply for a copy at the electronic address: e-mail: [email protected] or [email protected] Training and Doctrine Command Centre for Doctrine Publications Branch Printed: January 2013 2 TABLE OF CONTENTS Introduction ____________________________________________________ 5 Defence Directive 2013____________________________________________ 7 Mr.
    [Show full text]
  • Sustainability of the Karst Environment Dinaric Karst and Other Karst Regions
    The designations employed and the presentation of material throughout the publication do not imply the expression of any opinion whatsoever on the part of UNESCO concerning the legal status of any country, territory, city or area or of its authorities, or the delineation of its frontiers or boundaries. Published in 2010 by the United Nations Educational, Scientific and Cultural Organization 7, place de Fontenoy, 75352 Paris 07 SP Printed by UNESCO © UNESCO 2010 IHP-VII/2010/GW-2 SUSTAINABILITY OF THE KARST ENVIRONMENT DINARIC KARST AND OTHER KARST REGIONS International Interdisciplinary Scientific Conference (Plitvice Lakes, Croatia, 23-26 September 2009) Convened and Organised by: Centre for Karst (Gospi, Croatia) International Scientific Committee Ognjen Bonacci (Croatia), Chairman Franci Gabrovšek (Slovenia) Mladen Jurai (Croatia) Božidar Biondi (Croatia) Wolfgang Dreybrodt (Germany) Arthur Palmer (USA) Derek C. Ford (Canada) David Culver (USA) Andrej Mihevc (Slovenia) Jacques Mudry (France) Daoxian Yuan (China) Nico Goldscheider (Switzerland, Germany) Zoran Stevanovi (Serbia) Mario Parise (Italy) Hans Zojer (Austria) Elery Hamilton - Smith (Australia) Neven Kreši (USA) Bartolomé Andreo (Spain) Local Organizing Committee Jadranka Pejnovi, Chair Željko Župan, Secretary Ivo Lui Neven Boi Aleksandar Luki Ljudevit Tropan Dubravka Kljajo Krešimir ulinovi Ivica Tomljenovi Foreword The objective of the international interdisciplinary scientific conference “Sustainability of the karst environment - Dinaric karst and other karst regions”, organized by Centre for Karst, Gospi, Croatia, was to give a theoretical and practical contribution to the concept of sustainable development in karst regions, with a special emphasis on the experiences achieved in the Dinaric karst region. The exchange of information and findings obtained in other karst regions worldwide allows for an integral approach to this complex issue, and thereby contribute towards finding reliable solutions.
    [Show full text]
  • Lista E Pasurive Kulturore Qarku Vlore
    LISTA E MONUMENTEVE TË KULTURËS - QARKU VLORË ADRESA TË DHËNA TË SHPALLJES NR. EMËRTIMI I MONUMENTIT KATEG. NJ. INSTITUCIONI/ LAGJJA FSHATI BASHKIA QARKU ADMINISTRATIVE NR. VENDIMIT/ DATA 1.Rektorati i Universitetit Shtetëror të KALAJA E MAVROVËS NË Tiranës/ nr. 6/ dt. 15.01.1963 2.Ministria 1 I Mavrovë Kotë Selenicë Vlorë FSHATIN MAVROVË e Arsimit dhe Kulturës/nr.1886/ dt.10.06.1973 1.Vendim i Institutit i Shkencave (botuar në Gazetën Zyrtare Nr. 95, dt. 16.10.1948) KALAJA E KANINËS NË 2 I Kaninë Qendër Vlorë Vlorë Vlorë 2.Rektorati i Universitetit Shtetëror të FSHATIN KANINË Tiranës/ nr. 6/ dt. 15.01.1963 3.Ministria e Arsimit dhe Kulturës/nr.1886/ dt.10.06.1973 1.Rektorati i Universitetit Shtetëror të KALAJA E VRANISHTËS NË Tiranës/ nr. 6/ dt. 15.01.1963 3 I Vranisht Horë- Vranisht Himarë Vlorë FSHATIN VRANISHT 2.Ministria e Arsimit dhe Kulturës/nr.1886/ dt.10.06.1973 1.Rektorati i Universitetit Shtetëror të KALAJA E CERJES NË Tiranës/ nr. 6/ dt. 15.01.1963 4 I Brataj Himarë Himarë Vlorë FSHATIN BRATAJ 2.Ministria e Arsimit dhe Kulturës/nr.1886/ dt.10.06.1973 1.Rektorati i Universitetit Shtetëror të KALAJA E HIMARËS NË Tiranës/ nr. 6/ dt. 15.01.1963 5 I Himarë fshat Himarë Himarë Vlorë FSHATIN HIMARË 2.Ministria e Arsimit dhe Kulturës/nr.1886/ dt.10.06.1973 1.Rektorati i Universitetit Shtetëror të KALAJA E GJON BOÇARIT NË Tiranës/ nr. 6/ dt. 15.01.1963 6 I Tragjas Orikum Vlorë Vlorë FSHATIN TRAGJAS 2.Ministria e Arsimit dhe Kulturës/nr.1886/ dt.10.06.1973 1.Vendim i Institutit i Shkencave (botuar në Gazetën Zyrtare Nr.
    [Show full text]
  • Devoll Hydropower Project
    ! ! Official Assessment Statkraft Devoll Hydropower Project Albania Project Stage: Implementation Assessment Date: 21/11/2016 to 25/11/2016 ! ! Final Report Date: 01/06/2017!! ! ! Client:!Statkraft!AS! Lead+Assessor:!Doug!Smith,!independent!consultant!(DSmith!Environment!Ltd)! Co0assessors:!Joerg!Hartmann,!independent!consultant,!and!Elisa!Xiao,!independent!consultant! Project+size:!256!MW! ! ! ! ! ! + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + Cover+page+photo:!Banjë!reservoir,!looking!upstream!towards!the!town!of!Gramsh!and!the!reservoir!tail! ! Devoll Hydropower Project, Albania www.hydrosustainability.org | ii ! ! Acronyms Acronym+ Full+Text+ ADCP! Acoustic!Doppler!Current!Profiler! AIP! Annual!Implementation!Plan! ARA! Albanian!Roads!Authority! ASA! Archaeological!Service!Agency! BOOT! Build,!Own,!Operate,!Transfer! CA! Concession!Agreement! CDM! Clean!Development!Mechanism! CER! Certified!Emissions!Reductions! Devoll!HPP! Devoll!Hydropower!Project,!i.e.!the!entire!project!including!Banjë!and!Moglicë!projects!and! associated!infrastructure! DHP! Devoll!Hydropower!Sh.A! EMAP! Environmental!Management!and!Action!Plan! ESIA! Environmental!and!Social!Impact!Assessment!! ESM! Environmental!and!Social!Management! ESMP! Environmental!and!Social!Management!Plan! ESMPSO! Environmental!and!Social!Management!Plan!for!the!Operation!Stage! EVN!AG! An!Austrian!utility!group! EU! European!Union! FIDIC! International!Federation!of!Consulting!Engineers! GIS! Geographical!Information!System! GHG! Greenhouse!Gas! GoA! Government!of!Albania! GRI!
    [Show full text]