DOCSLIB.ORG

Principles of the Carriage of Goods by Sea

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Principles of the Carriage of Goods by Sea Principles of the Carriage of Goods by Sea Principles of the Carriage of Goods by Sea offers students studying this topic as part of their LLM or LLB course an accessible, comprehensive overview of the subject from a leading expert in the field. Writ­ ten specifically with students in mind, concentrating on principles, and tailored to common law coverage, this title presents all the essential topics and is supported by the following useful pedagogy: • Line Diagrams: illustrating the relationships between parties so that this may be understood at a glance; also, where appropriate, time lines • Case Studies: looking at topical matters such as piracy, and problematic areas of law such as reachable on arrival clauses and the carriage of bulk oil by sea • Sample Problem Questions: problem questions and suggestions to help students to prepare for assessment • Annotated Appendices: concise appendix of the most important legislation and international conventions, with useful annotation from the author that explains these and puts them in con­ text Paul Todd is Professor of Commercial and Maritime Law at the University of Southampton. He has been teaching law for almost 40 years, and has written a wide range of publications in international trade law and carriage of goods by sea. This page intentionally left blank Principles of the Carriage of Goods by Sea Paul Todd First published 2016 by Routledge 2 Park Square, Milton Park, Abingdon, Oxon, OX14 4RN and by Routledge 711 Third Avenue, New York, NY 10017 Routledge is an imprint of the Taylor & Francis Group, an Informa business © 2016 Paul Todd The right of Paul Todd to be identified as author of this work has been asserted by him in accordance with sections 77 and 78 of the Copyright, Designs and Patents Act 1988. All rights reserved. No part of this book may be reprinted or reproduced or utilised in any form or by any electronic, mechanical, or other means, now known or hereafter invented, including photocopying and recording, or in any information storage or retrieval system, without permission in writing from the publishers. Trademark notice: Product or corporate names may be trademarks or registered trademarks, and are used only for identification and explanation without intent to infringe. British Library Cataloguing-in-Publication Data A catalogue record for this book is available from the British Library Library of Congress Cataloging-in-Publication Data Todd, Paul, 1954– Principles of the carriage of goods by sea / Paul Todd. pages cm Includes bibliographical references and index. 1. Maritime law. I. Title. K1160.T63 2016 343.09'62—dc23 2015016220 ISBN: 978-0-415-74374-7 (hbk) ISBN: 978-0-415-74373-0 (pbk) ISBN: 978-1-315-81349-3 (ebk) Typeset in Joanna by Apex CoVantage, LLC Outline Contents Preface xvii Acknowledgments xix Table of Cases xxi Part 1 Introduction to carriage of goods by sea 1 1 Introduction, bills of lading and charterparties 3 2 Carriage and the general law of contract 22 3 Other legal principles underpinning carriage of goods by sea 45 4 Obligations implied into contracts for the carriage of goods by sea 59 Part 2 Voyage charterparties 83 5 Nature of voyage charterparties 85 6 The approach voyage and the voyage 92 7 Freight 101 8 Loading and discharge (1): introduction and laytime 116 9 Loading and discharge (2): demurrage 131 Part 3 Time charterparties 145 10 Nature of time charterparties 147 11 Period of charter: delivery and redelivery 161 12 Time charterparty hire 179 13 Time charters: employment and indemnity 204 Part 4 Carriage (other than charterparties) 235 14 Introduction: bills of lading and similar documents 237 15 Bill of lading contract terms 248 16 Carriage of Goods by Sea Act 1992 (and related issues) 269 17 Other privity of contract issues 293 18 Hague and Hague-Visby Rules 309 vi | OUTLINE CONTENTS 19 Representations in bills of lading 337 20 The bill of lading as a document of title 347 21 Carriage by sea in the modern world 359 Part 5 Supporting material 371 22 Case studies 373 23 Further reading 390 Appendices 393 Appendix A: Carriage of Goods by Sea Act 1971 (Hague-Visby Rules) 395 Appendix B: Carriage of Goods by Sea Act 1992 405 Appendix C: Hamburg Rules 411 Appendix D: Rotterdam Rules (selected Articles) 423 Index 439 Detailed Contents Preface xvii Acknowledgments xix Table of Cases xxi Part 1 Introduction to carriage of goods by sea 1 1 Introduction, bills of lading and charterparties 3 1.1 Layout of the book 4 1.2 Introduction: distinction between charterparties and bills of lading 4 1.3 Types of charterparty 5 1.4 More on voyage charter terms 6 1.5 More on time charterparty terms 8 1.6 Terms that are common to both types of charterparty 9 1.7 Erosion of the distinction? 10 1.8 Does the distinction matter? 10 1.9 Sub-charterparties 11 1.10 Standard forms 12 1.10.1 Standard form charters: dry cargo 13 1.10.2 Standard form charters: tankers 15 1.11 Charterparties and markets 16 1.12 Following chapters 17 2 Carriage and the general law of contract 22 2.1 Introduction 23 2.2 Contract formation 23 2.3 Terms and their construction 25 2.4 Privity of contract 25 2.5 Market variations and remedies 26 2.6 Conditions, warranties and innominate terms 28 2.6.1 Categories of term, and relevance of seriousness of breach 28 2.6.2 Conditions after Hongkong Fir 30 2.6.3 Effect of repudiation 32 2.7 Anticipatory breach 32 2.8 Affirmation by the innocent party 33 2.9 Damages revisited 35 2.9.1 General principles 35 2.9.2 Mitigation 36 2.9.3 Other limits to damages 37 2.9.4 Penalties 37 2.10 Repudiation and exemption clauses 38 viii | DETAILED CONTENTS 2.11 Construction and serious breaches 39 2.12 Frustration of a contract of carriage 39 2.12.1 Law Reform (Frustrated Contracts) Act 1943 41 2.12.2 Requisition and entrapment 41 2.12.3 Frustration and delay 42 3 Other legal principles underpinning carriage of goods by sea 45 3.1 Introduction 46 3.2 Bailment 46 3.2.1 Principles of bailment 46 3.2.2 Burden of proof 48 3.2.3 Rights of common carriers and bailees for reward 49 3.2.4 Bailment on terms 49 3.3 Tort actions 50 3.4 Law and equity in carriage 50 3.4.1 Introduction 50 3.4.2 Equitable notice doctrine 51 3.4.3 Notice doctrine in maritime commerce 52 3.4.4 Reluctance elsewhere to extend equitable principles 53 3.5 Good faith in carriage of goods by sea 54 3.6 Risk in carriage of goods by sea 56 4 Obligations implied into contracts for the carriage of goods by sea 59 4.1 Introduction 60 4.2 Duty to provide seaworthy vessel 60 4.2.1 Introduction 60 4.2.2 Substance of obligation 61 4.2.3 Cargoworthiness 63 4.2.4 When obligation attaches 64 4.2.5 Stages 65 4.2.6 Fundamental obligation 67 4.2.7 Contracting out of obligation 68 4.2.8 Seaworthiness and causation 68 4.2.9 Seaworthiness paramount 69 4.2.10 Burden of proof 69 4.2.11 Effect of breach 69 4.3 Duties in respect of the cargo 70 4.4 Deviation 71 4.4.1 Duty of shipowner not to deviate 71 4.4.2 Consequences of unjustified deviation 71 4.4.3 Justified deviations 73 4.4.4 Deviation liberty clauses 75 4.5 Obligation to proceed with reasonable despatch 76 4.6 Obligation not to ship dangerous cargo 77 4.6.1 What is dangerous cargo? 77 4.6.2 Arts. III(1) and IV(6) 78 4.6.3 Who bears the risk? 78 DETAILED CONTENTS | ix Part 2 Voyage charterparties 83 5 Nature of voyage charterparties 85 5.1 Introduction 86 5.2 Terms of voyage charterparties 86 5.3 FIO and gross terms 87 5.4 Classification of terms 87 5.5 Consecutive voyage charters 88 5.6 Terms common to the consecutive voyage charterparty 89 5.7 Contracts of affreightment 90 6 The approach voyage and the voyage 92 6.1 Approach voyage: introduction 93 6.2 Cancelling clause 94 6.3 Expected readiness to load 95 6.4 ETA 97 6.5 Present position and other clauses 97 6.6 Reasonable despatch 98 7 Freight 101 7.1 Introduction 102 7.2 Delivered freight 102 7.3 Lumpsum freight, freight pro rata itineris and back freight 105 7.4 Advance freight 106 7.5 The standard forms 107 7.6 Setting off damages against freight 109 7.7 Cargo retention and similar clauses 111 7.8 Deadfreight 112 7.9 Lien and cesser 112 8 Loading and discharge (1): introduction and laytime 116 8.1 Time for loading and discharge: an overview 117 8.2 Stages of a voyage 118 8.3 Commencement of laytime 118 8.4 Traditional allocation of delay risks 119 8.5 Definition of arrived ship 119 8.5.1 The Johanna Oldendorff and precedent 121 8.5.2 The Johanna Oldendorff itself 121 8.6 Validity of notice of readiness (NOR) 123 8.6.1 The problem 123 8.6.2 Inchoate NOR 124 8.7 Breach before NOR 126 8.8 Achieving traditional allocation of risk 128 8.8.1 Late arrival, and earlier tendering of NOR 128 8.8.2 Early arrival, but with exceptions 128 8.9 Laytime and standard forms 129 x | DETAILED CONTENTS 9 Loading and discharge (2): demurrage 131 9.1 Nature of demurrage 132 9.2 Length of time on demurrage 133 9.3 Jupiter clauses 134 9.4 Avoidance of demurrage regime by repudiating 135 9.5 Independent breach? 135 9.6 Different type of loss and/or breach of different obligation 137 9.7 Repudiating the charterparty 138 9.8 Must elect to repudiate 140 9.9 Application to consecutive voyages 140 9.10 Once on demurrage always on demurrage 142 Part 3 Time charterparties 145 10 Nature of time charterparties 147 10.1 Main features of time charters 148 10.2 Use of time and demise charters 149 10.3 Some time charterparty clauses 151 10.4 Trip-time charters 152 10.5 Distinction between time and demise charters 153 10.6 Time charterparties and third parties 154 10.7 Property and tort actions 158 10.8 Test for demise charterparty
Load more

Recommended publications
  • This Paper Has Been Published in the Journal of Business Law and The
    Supreme Court of Singapore, 1 Supreme Court Lane, Singapore 178879, t: (65)-6332-1020 _________________________________________________________________________________________________ This paper has been published in the Journal of Business Law and the Supreme Court Library Queensland gratefully acknowledges the permission of the editor, Professor Robert Merkin, to reprint it in the Yearbook. A version of this essay was delivered at the Current Legal Issues Seminar in the Banco Court on 12 September 2013. I would like to express my deepest appreciation to Ms Andrea Gan and Mr Jonathan Yap, Justices’ Law Clerks, Supreme Court of Singapore, as well as to Asst Prof Goh Yihan of the Faculty of Law, National University of Singapore, for their helpful comments and suggestions. I would also like to dedicate this essay to all the participants who displayed an extraordinary (and, I might add, rare) degree of enthusiasm and (above all) friendship. All errors remain mine alone. Further, all views expressed in this essay are personal views only and do not reflect the views of the Supreme Court of Singapore. Andrew Phang Our Vision: Excellence in judicial education and research. Our Mission: To provide and inspire continuing judicial learning and research to enhance the competency and professionalism of judges. The Challenge of Principled Gap-Filling — A Study of Implied Terms in a Comparative Context by The Honourable Justice Andrew Phang Boon Leong* There has been a veritable wealth of literature on implied terms — ranging from doctoral theses1 to book chapters,2 articles3 and (more recently) a book.4 What accounts for this interest? Perhaps the simplest explanation is that it is an extremely important topic with at least two important functions — one substantive, the other theoretical.
    [Show full text]
  • Implied Terms: the Foundation in Good Faith and Fair Dealing LSE Research Online URL for This Paper: Version: Accepted Version
    View metadata, citation and similar papers at core.ac.uk brought to you by CORE provided by LSE Research Online Implied terms: the foundation in good faith and fair dealing LSE Research Online URL for this paper: http://eprints.lse.ac.uk/101641/ Version: Accepted Version Article: Collins, Hugh (2014) Implied terms: the foundation in good faith and fair dealing. Current Legal Problems, 67 (1). 297 - 331. ISSN 0070-1998 https://doi.org/10.1093/clp/cuu002 Reuse Items deposited in LSE Research Online are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved unless indicated otherwise. They may be downloaded and/or printed for private study, or other acts as permitted by national copyright laws. The publisher or other rights holders may allow further reproduction and re-use of the full text version. This is indicated by the licence information on the LSE Research Online record for the item. [email protected] https://eprints.lse.ac.uk/ Implied Terms: the Foundation in Good Faith and Fair Dealing Hugh Collins* Confusion as much as controversy permeates the subject of implied terms in contracts. Controversy always surrounds their purpose and legitimacy, for implied terms lie on the point of friction between the basic disposition of the common law to respect freedom of contract and the regulatory impulse to prevent the worst instances of market exploitation and opportunism. Implied terms permit judicial intervention whilst maintaining the appearance of conformity to the idea of respecting the parties’ self-determination. Confusion now reigns as well, however, for there is no consensus on the legal tests for the introduction of implied terms into contracts, even to the extent of losing them altogether within the nebula of the interpretation of contracts.
    [Show full text]
  • Maritime Carrier's Liability for Loss of Or Damage to Goods Under The
    Maritime Carrier's Liability for Loss of or Damage to Goods under the Hague Rules, Visby Rules and the Hamburg Rules, compared with his Liability as an Operator under the Relevant Rules of the International Multimodal Transport Convention. A Thesis Submitted for the Degree of Doctor of Philosophy by Hani M.S. Abdulrahim The School of Law, Faculty of Law and Financial Studies, University of Glasgow February 1994 © Hani M.S. Abdulrahim, 1994 ProQuest Number: 11007904 All rights reserved INFORMATION TO ALL USERS The quality of this reproduction is dependent upon the quality of the copy submitted. In the unlikely event that the author did not send a com plete manuscript and there are missing pages, these will be noted. Also, if material had to be removed, a note will indicate the deletion. uest ProQuest 11007904 Published by ProQuest LLC(2018). Copyright of the Dissertation is held by the Author. All rights reserved. This work is protected against unauthorized copying under Title 17, United States C ode Microform Edition © ProQuest LLC. ProQuest LLC. 789 East Eisenhower Parkway P.O. Box 1346 Ann Arbor, Ml 48106- 1346 “ILhl m i GLASGOW C>p I UNIVERr'T library ii To My mother, brothers, sisters and in memory of my father. Acknowledgements I wish with considerable enthusiasm to acknowledge and express my deepest grateful thanks and gratitude to Dr. W. Balekjian and Mr Alan Gamble for their invaluable guidance and encouragement in supervising this thesis. They have given unsparingly of their time to it. It gives me great pleasure to acknowledge the helpfulness of the Glasgow University library staff, and also my deep gratitude to Mrs Cara Wilson who kindly typed this work.
    [Show full text]
  • A Boxful of Rules Captain VS Parani
    World Maritime University The Maritime Commons: Digital Repository of the World Maritime University Books Library 2018 A Boxful of Rules Captain VS Parani Follow this and additional works at: https://commons.wmu.se/lib_books Part of the Transportation Commons Recommended Citation Parani, Captain VS, "A Boxful of Rules" (2018). Books. 3. https://commons.wmu.se/lib_books/3 This Book is brought to you courtesy of Maritime Commons. Open Access items may be downloaded for non-commercial, fair use academic purposes. No items may be hosted on another server or web site without express written permission from the World Maritime University. For more information, please contact [email protected]. A Boxful of Rules Captain VS Parani 0 A Boxful of Rules Captain VS Parani What the book is about? Are you involved with or studying the logistics and transport industry? Have you wondered what happens when things go wrong during the transport, such as when a shipment of televisions is received in damaged condition, a container of cigarettes is stolen, or, an important shipment of prawns is received a week too late for the local market? Well, this is what this book is all about! In the modern global economy, finished and semi-finished products are transported in large volumes across the globe. Things do go wrong during such transport; then what recourse does the cargo owner have? How much loss will be made good by the insurers and under which convention? On opening the container, a strange sight awaits the consignee at the destination! How and when did this cargo get damaged? Such situations complicate the liability regime in multimodal transport.
    [Show full text]
  • Allocation of the Risk of Loss in the Transportation of Freight--The Function of Insurance
    Fordham Law Review Volume 40 Issue 1 Article 3 1971 Allocation of the Risk of Loss in the Transportation of Freight--The Function of Insurance Saul Sorkin Follow this and additional works at: https://ir.lawnet.fordham.edu/flr Part of the Law Commons Recommended Citation Saul Sorkin, Allocation of the Risk of Loss in the Transportation of Freight--The Function of Insurance, 40 Fordham L. Rev. 67 (1971). Available at: https://ir.lawnet.fordham.edu/flr/vol40/iss1/3 This Article is brought to you for free and open access by FLASH: The Fordham Law Archive of Scholarship and History. It has been accepted for inclusion in Fordham Law Review by an authorized editor of FLASH: The Fordham Law Archive of Scholarship and History. For more information, please contact [email protected]. Allocation of the Risk of Loss in the Transportation of Freight--The Function of Insurance Cover Page Footnote Member of the New York Bar; A.B., Brooklyn College, LL.B., Harvard University. Mr. Sorkin is a Partner in the New York firm of Sorkin & Berger. This article is available in Fordham Law Review: https://ir.lawnet.fordham.edu/flr/vol40/iss1/3 ALLOCATION OF THE RISK OF LOSS IN THE TRANSPORTATION OF FREIGHT-THE FUNCTION OF INSURANCE SAUL SORKIN* I. INTRODUCTION IT has been estimated by the Select Committee on Small Business of the United States Senate Commerce Committee that pilferage, vandalism and hijacking have resulted in property losses of 1.2 billion dollars a year,1 exclusive of losses resulting from other causes. However, the lack of a uniform standard of liability precludes a rational system of allocating the risk of these losses.
    [Show full text]
  • Expanding the Carrier's Right to Claim Indemnity Under Section 3(5) of COGSA for Inaccurate Bills of Lading
    Duquesne Law Review Volume 24 Number 3 Article 5 1986 Expanding the Carrier's Right to Claim Indemnity under Section 3(5) of COGSA for Inaccurate Bills of Lading Robert M. Jarvis Follow this and additional works at: https://dsc.duq.edu/dlr Part of the Law Commons Recommended Citation Robert M. Jarvis, Expanding the Carrier's Right to Claim Indemnity under Section 3(5) of COGSA for Inaccurate Bills of Lading, 24 Duq. L. Rev. 811 (1986). Available at: https://dsc.duq.edu/dlr/vol24/iss3/5 This Article is brought to you for free and open access by Duquesne Scholarship Collection. It has been accepted for inclusion in Duquesne Law Review by an authorized editor of Duquesne Scholarship Collection. Expanding the Carrier's Right to Claim Indemnity Under Section 3(5) of COGSA for Inaccurate Bills of Lading Robert M. Jarvis* INTRODUCTION On April 16, 1986, the United States completed fifty years of ex- perience with the Carriage of Goods by Sea Act.1 The Act, often referred to as COGSA, provides a detailed legal regime2 which reg- ulates the respective rights and obligations of carriers and ship- pers.3 Since its enactment, COGSA's many provisions have spawned much litigation and scholarly comment.4 * B.A., Northwestern University, 1980; J.D., University of Pennsylvania, 1983. The au- thor is a member of the New York and California bars and practices maritime law with the firm of Baker & McKenzie in New York City. All of the views expressed herein, however, are solely those of the author. This Article is based on a lecture that the author delivered at the Rutgers University School of Law (Camden) on June 27, 1985.
    [Show full text]
  • Nvocc Bill of Lading Terms and Conditions
    Nvocc Bill Of Lading Terms And Conditions Impending and dockside Shalom always remitting even-handedly and expostulated his resin. Crystalline Seth still fobs: tweedier and wide-angle Theophyllus glissaded quite impermanently but redrew her hierurgies unbiasedly. Unmercenary and fibroid Aleksandrs cross some Fairbanks so hand-to-mouth! Goods or the carriers option of lading of bill terms and nvocc through payments to All associated costs will be for the account of the cargo. Merchant shall be payable by nvocc bill of lading by any term shall be surrendered in other expenses or conditions hereof unless in proper shipping. The Trucking company: Djuric Trucking, and for which extra freight has anyone paid withdraw the Merchant. China it pursue an individual. Sun and may be null and where transportation and final price of lading of the deficit from such goods, increase two common terms of the carriage of? Goods have been properly stuffed in the Container, conveyance and any other facilities, are subject to Bill of Lading limit of value. Freight payable at the carriage exercise due diligence to notify your local agent, bill of and nvocc terms that case involving several days thereafter shall be paid to deliver the ultimate settlement for? BL to the Subject to the conditions of this BL the FF shall be responsible for the acts and omissions of his were his own. We are a broker and one of our customers went bankrupt. NVOCC Rules Tariff JB Hunt. If any loss, flnew york in no responsibility on board bill of lading or regulations prescribed by any.
    [Show full text]
  • Blank Portrait
    TABLE OF CONTENTS SECTION A. GENERAL TERMS AND CONDITIONS ......................................................................................................... 1 1. Governing Publications. .............................................................................................................................................. 1 2. Application ................................................................................................................................................................... 1 3. Modification ................................................................................................................................................................. 1 4. Savings Clause ........................................................................................................................................................... 1 5. Recordkeeping and Audit ............................................................................................................................................ 1 6. Effect of Noncompliance ............................................................................................................................................. 1 7. Waiver ......................................................................................................................................................................... 1 8. Force Majeure ............................................................................................................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • Final Thesis
    University of Huddersfield Repository Alawneh, Tariq A critical analysis of the implied obligation against unjustified deviation: Is the rule still relevant to the modern law on carriage of goods by sea? Original Citation Alawneh, Tariq (2015) A critical analysis of the implied obligation against unjustified deviation: Is the rule still relevant to the modern law on carriage of goods by sea? Doctoral thesis, University of Huddersfield. This version is available at http://eprints.hud.ac.uk/id/eprint/26283/ The University Repository is a digital collection of the research output of the University, available on Open Access. Copyright and Moral Rights for the items on this site are retained by the individual author and/or other copyright owners. Users may access full items free of charge; copies of full text items generally can be reproduced, displayed or performed and given to third parties in any format or medium for personal research or study, educational or not-for-profit purposes without prior permission or charge, provided: • The authors, title and full bibliographic details is credited in any copy; • A hyperlink and/or URL is included for the original metadata page; and • The content is not changed in any way. For more information, including our policy and submission procedure, please contact the Repository Team at: [email protected]. http://eprints.hud.ac.uk/ A critical analysis of the implied obligation against unjustified deviation: Is the rule still relevant to the modern law on carriage of goods by sea? By Tariq Alawneh A Thesis submitted to the University of Huddersfield In partial fulfilment of the requirements for The degree of Doctor of Philosophy Department of Law-Business School University of Huddersfield April 2015 COPYRIGHT STATEMENT i.
    [Show full text]
  • Commentary by UNCTAD Secretariat on Draft Instrument on Transport
    UNCTAD/SDTE/TLB/4 13 March 2002 ENGLISH ONLY UNITED NATIONS CONFERENCE ON TRADE AND DEVELOPMENT Commentary by the UNCTAD secretariat on DRAFT INSTRUMENT ON TRANSPORT LAW* * UNCITRAL document A/CN.9/WG.III/WP.21, Annex I. GE.02-50556 2 BACKGROUND i. The efficient functioning of transport services, to a large extent, depends on the existence of an up-to-date and supportive legal framework. Internationally, three conventions co-exist to govern the carriage of goods by sea. However, in the absence of a widely acceptable and modern uniform regime, individual States have started to opt for national solutions. Proliferation of diverse national regimes and the increasing lack of uniformity of regulation at the international level is of particular concern against a background of growing globalization of trade. ii. In an effort to address these concerns, the UNCITRAL Commission, at its 34th session, created a working group to consider possible uniform regulation in the field of maritime transport. In view of UNCTAD’s involvement with the subject, the Commission specifically provided that the work should be carried out in close cooperation with interested intergovernmental organizations, such as UNCTAD. iii. A Draft Instrument has since been prepared by the CMI for consideration by the UNCITRAL Working Group at its meeting in April 2002 in New York (A/CN.9/WG.III/WP.21). Given the mandate provided in the UNCTAD X Plan of Action (TD/386 paras. 148, 149, 150 and 152) and as part of the agreed co-operation with UNCITRAL, the UNCTAD secretariat has prepared a commentary on the Draft Instrument (UNCITRAL working document A/CN.9/WG.III/WP.21/Add.1, available in all UN languages).
    [Show full text]
  • The Basis of Contractual Duties of Good Faith
    Paul Davis Printer's Version 2.0 (Do Not Delete) 5/25/2019 12:31 PM THE BASIS OF CONTRACTUAL DUTIES OF GOOD FAITH PAUL S DAVIES* ABSTRACT. This article considers the basis of duties of good faith where not expressly provided for by the parties. It analyses the different approaches adopted in Canada and England and Wales, and assesses whether good faith is part of an ‘irreducible core’ of contract law or whether it should only be introduced into a contract through the mechanism of implied terms. It is suggested that the latter approach is preferable, and that (in the commercial context at least) courts should be wary about imposing duties of good faith on parties who did not provide for such duties. Well-advised commercial parties who wish particular duties to govern their relationship should be encouraged to stipulate such duties expressly in their contract. KEYWORDS: Contract, good faith, implied terms, Bhasin v Hrynew, Yam Seng, interpretation, commercial law. In Bhasin v Hrynew, Cromwell J rightly observed that “[t]he jurisprudence is not always very clear about the source of the good faith obligations found in [contract] cases”.1 Such *Professor of Commercial Law, University College London. I am grateful for the comments of participants at the very stimulating conference on “Good Faith in Contract” held at the Université de Montréal in May 2018 where an earlier version of this article was presented, and especially to Matthew Harrington for the invitation. Even earlier versions of this article were presented at a Chancery Bar Association seminar on “Contractual Discretions” held at the Inner Temple, London, in March 2018, and at a workshop on “Contract Interpretation: A Comparative Discussion” held at the University of Lund, Sweden, in April 2018 (following the very kind 1 Paul Davis Printer's Version 2.0 (Do Not Delete) 5/25/2019 12:31 PM 2 JOURNAL OF COMMONWEALTH LAW [Vol.
    [Show full text]
  • The Duty to Perform Commercial Contracts in Good Faith
    Tribunale Bologna 24.07.2007, n.7770 - ISSN 2239-7752 Direttore responsabile: Antonio Zama The duty to perform commercial contracts in good faith: a critical analysis of the recent developments and the impact on loan agreements The Implied Duty to Perform Contracts in Good Faith 19 Settembre 2019 Luca Morrone Indice: 1. The implied duty to perform contracts in good faith 1.1 The implication of the duty in Yam Seng 1.1.1 Is there a general duty of good faith in commercial contracts? 1.1.2 Relational contracts 1.1.3 Contractual discretions 1.2. The content of the duty 1.3 Is the implied duty of good faith necessary? Abstract Il presente articolo “The Implied Duty to Perform Contracts in Good Faith” costituisce la seconda di tre parti dell'elaborato “The Duty to Perform Commercial Contracts in Good Faith: a Critical Analysis of the Recent Developments and the Impact on Loan Agreements”, il quale analizza il dovere di agire secondo buona fede nei rapporti commerciali (il cosiddetto “duty of good faith”) e, in particolare, nei contratti di finanziamento disciplinati dal diritto inglese. Dopo aver svolto un’introduzione a carattere storico-dottrinale sul principio di buona fede, questa parte dell’articolo si prefigge lo scopo di identificare e delineare le connotazioni giuridiche che ha assunto ad oggi il dovere di agire secondo buona fede nelle relazioni contrattuali. Nello specifico, vengono individuati nei cosiddetti “relational contracts” e nelle “contractual discretions” i due principali ambiti di applicazione della buona fede. Mentre i relational contracts costituiscono una tipologia di contratti aventi caratteristiche quali la lunga durata, una molteplicità di obblighi contrattuali, requisiti di collaborazione fra le parti e la necessità di variare i termini contrattuali nel corso della loro durata, le contractual discretions rappresentano un istituto tipicamente anglosassone che permette ad una delle parti contrattuali di valutare discrezionalmente le modalità di esercizio del diritto contrattuale, piuttosto che l'eventualità di esercitarlo.
    [Show full text]