Park Blocks Jamison Square SW Madison St

Total Page:16

File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

Park Blocks Jamison Square SW Madison St Parks can be Key to Economic Development Janet Bebb, Metro September 11, 2012 Robin Craig, GreenWorks PC Why now? • National obesity and health crisis • Diminishing Park Budgets • Slow Economy Interviews with 4 Developers Under what circumstances does open space sell your product? When does open space not matter to your work? When can open space be detrimental? • Matt Brown, Loci Development • Dennis Wilde, Gerdling Edlen • Jim Winkler, Winkler Development Corporation • Dave Wood, Newland Communities Strategic Use of Parks 1. Park system master plans - “Traditional Path” - Fills in service gaps 2. Protect natural resources where they occur 3. Strategically use parks, trails, and natural areas to incent a market response Strategic Use of Parks • Positioning parks to be part of The Fields the solution • Participate with development Tanner Springs Park program • Understand developer’s perspectives • Be creative with partnerships Jamison Park Pearl District - Jamison Park in foreground with an unbuilt Tanner Springs Park plot and vacant plot for the Fields Park just beyond the construction crane. Portland, Oregon (2002) Guiding Principle #1 Parks have different effects on different types of development. • Mixed Use and Complete Communities • Housing Development - Urban Director’s Park during construction - Portland, OR and Suburban • Commercial and Retail Development Director’s Park - Portland, OR Guiding Principle #2 Parks are integral to creating complete communities. • Urban and Suburban • Open space and transit are both equally key Villebois Development Open Space Plan - Wilsonville, Oregon MAY 12, 2010 “A SURVEY BY THE NATIONAL ASSOCIATION OF REALTORS REVEALED THAT 57% OF VOT- ERS WOULD CHOOSE A HOME CLOSE TO A PARK OVER ONE WITHOUT AND 50% WOULD BE WILLING TO PAY 10% MORE.” Guiding Principle #3 There are circumstances where parks are irrelevent. Adidas World Headquarters - Portland, Oregon Mississippi Avenue Streetscape - Portland, Oregon Developers told us: “IN SOME INSTANCES, A PARK SETTING IS NOT NECESSARY TO FOSTER ECONOMIC DEVELOPMENT.” • Active Streets and Retail • Secret shoes Guiding Principle #4 Provide certainty Developers told us: “PARKS NEED TO BE BUILT EARLY AND BE IN PLACE PRIOR TO MARKETING DEVELOPMENT.” A future promise is not convincing in a slow market. Elizabeth Caruthers Park - South Waterfront, Portland, Oregon Guiding Principle #5 Passive Parks are key; active recreation is not. Developers told us: “ HOUSING RESPONDS WELL TO PASSIVE RECREATION AND NATURAL AREAS.” • Walking paths • Unprogrammed open areas • Special gardens • Not active sports Jamison Square - Pearl District, Portland, Oregon Guiding Principle #5 Passive Parks are key; active recreation is not. Headwaters Development - First daylighted stream in Portland, Oregon Headwaters Development- Once a parking lot..... CASE STUDIES: Highline - New York, New York Figure 11: Elizabeth Caruthers Park and the John Re-Imagining Existing Infrastructure Ross Tower - Portland, Oregon. W. 19th St. HIGHLINE 10th Ave. W. 18th St. W. 17th St. 11th Ave. W. 16th St. 9th Ave. W. 15th St. Highlighted Area W. 14th St. Park Boundary Featured Park Existing Park 0 250’ 500’ TOTAL COST: $152 MILLION (PHASES I & II) PRIVATE DONATIONS: $44 MILLION BY FRIENDS OF THE HIGH LINE SIZE: 6.73 ACRES PROJECTED DEVELOPMENT VALUE: $2 billion in private investment CASE STUDIES: BeltLine - Atlanta, Georgia Figure 11: Elizabeth Caruthers Park and the John Coordination with Transit Ross Tower - Portland, Oregon. ATLANTA BELTLINE Highlighted Area Dallas St. NE Dallas St. NE St. Dallas Historic Fourth Ward Park Wilmer St. NE St. Wilmer Rankin St. NE Ralph McGill Bvld. NE Angier Ave NE Park Boundary Featured Park Existing Park 0 250’ 500’ TOTAL PROJECT COST: $ 2.8 BILLION TOTAL COST FOR PARKS: $755 - $910 MILLION LAND ACQUISITION: $480 - $570 MILLION PARK AND TRAIL CONSTRUCTION: $275 - $340 MILLION PROJECTED DEVELOPMENT VALUE: $20 billion Historic Fourth Ward Park - BeltLine, Atlanta, Georgia CASE STUDIES: Seattle Scultpure Garden - Seattle, Washington Figure 11: Elizabeth Caruthers Park and the John Extreme Brownfield Redevelopment Ross Tower - Portland, Oregon. Denny Way 2nd Ave. Warren Pl. Warren Elliott Ave. Bay St. Eagle St. 1st Ave. OLYMPIC SCULPTURE PARK Broad St. Western Ave. Puget Sound Highlighted Area Clay St. Park Boundary Featured Park Existing Park 0 250’ 500’ SIZE: 8.5 ACRES FEDERAL FUNDING TO DATE: $5 MILLION KING COUNTY: $1.7 MILLION STATE FUNDING: $8.1 MILLION Guiding Principle #6 Key Common Elements • UNDERUTILIZED OR ABANDONED AREA CLOSE TO CITY CENTER • SIGNIFICANT EFFORT TOWARD A LARGE VISION • INVESTMENT TYPICALLY INVOLVES LOCAL, STATE, FEDERAL AND PRIVATE FUNDING • DESIGN EXCELLENCE • HIGH VISBILITY AND DESTINATION LINKAGES South Waterfront Portland - The park and greenway goes fi rst... Guiding Principle #7 Proximate Principle Parks, trails, and open space can have a positive effect on adjacent property values and can lead to proportionately higher tax revenues for local governments. Fifth Avenue and Central Park - New York City, New York Guiding Principle #7 Proximate Principle LAURELHURST PARK SE Oak St. $1.65 M $746 K $431 K $533 K $504 K SE Stark St. $367 K $329 K $286 K $293 K $346 K $505 K SE Washington St. $322 K $314 K $264 K $242 K $221 K $282 K SE Alder St. A view of residences near Laurelhurst Park - Portland, OR $220 K $241 K $639 K $429 K SE Morrison St. $402 K $300 K $295 K $333 K $333 K SE Belmont St. $363 K $295 K $306 K $300 K $277 K SE Yamhill St. $524 K $261 K A sampling of tax values near Laurelhurst Park - Portland, OR A view of Laurelhurst Park - Portland, OR Guiding Principle #7 Proximate Principle 290’ 290’ 250’ 250’ 210’ 210’ 170’ 170’ 130’ 130’ 90’ 90’ PARK 290’ 290’ 250’ 250’ 210’ 210’ 170’ 170’ PARK Graham Oaks Nature Park - Wilsonville, OR CITY OF WILSONVILLE STAFF TOLD US: “THE VILLEBOIS LOTS ADJACENT TO GRAHAM OAKS NATURE PARK WERE SOLD FIRST AND AT HIGHER PRICES.” Guiding Principle #7 Proximate Principle The Fields SW Alder St. NW Pettygrove St. SW 11th St. SW SW 9th St. SW SW Park Ave. SW 10th St. 10th SW SW Broadway Ave. Broadway SW SW Morrison St. 6th St. SW NW Overton St. Pioneer Square NW 12th Ave. NW 13th Ave. NW 11th Ave. NW 9th Ave. SW Yamhill St. DIRECTOR Ave. NW 10th NW Northrup St. PARK TANNER SPRINGS SW Taylor St. NW Marshall St. 600’ Radius 600’ Radius SW Salmon St. NW Lovejoy St. SW Main St. NW Kearney St. South Park Blocks Jamison Square SW Madison St. Featured Park Featured Park 0 100 200 400 0 100 200 400 Tanner Springs Park O’Bryant Square NW Marshall St. SW Washington St. STUDIES NATIONWIDE ACROSS UR- SW 10th St. 10th SW NW 9th Ave. NW 11th Ave. NW 10th Ave. NW 10th NW 12th Ave. SW 9th St. SW Park Ave. Ave. Broadway SW SW 6th St. SW 5th St. SW 4th St. BAN AND SUBURBAN CONTEXTS NW 13th Ave. NW Lovejoy St. SW Alder St. REVEAL THAT PROPERTIES IN SW Morrison St. NW Kearney St. PIONEER JAMISON COURTHOUSE PROXIMITY TO PARKS HAVE SQUARE SQUARE SW Yamhill St. NW Johnson St. INCREASED PROPERTY VALUES 600’ Radius 600’ Radius Park Director SW Taylor St. RANGING FROM 2% TO 20%. THESE NW Irving St. VALUES TYPICALLY HAVE AN IN- SW Salmon St. NW Hoyt St. Chapman Square FLUENCE FOR UP TO 600 - 1200 South Park Blocks Featured Park FEET FROM THE PARK. Featured Park 0 100 200 400 0 100 200 400 Guiding Principle #7 Linear Parks Principle Parks can maximize potential frontage properties by creating linear parks. ELONGATED PARKS ARE PREFER- ABLE TO SQUARE PARKS IF FUNC- TION PERMITS. ELONGATED PARKS INCREASE PARK PERIMETER. A DOUBLE SQUARE PARK WITH THE SAME AREA AS A SQUARE PARK WILL HAVE A 6% LONGER PERIM- ETER. A TRIPLE SQUARE PARK HAS A 15% LONGER PERIMETER. Linear Park Principle - Andrew Ross Miller “ Valuing Open Space: Land Economics and Neighborhood Parks” Guiding Principle #7 Linear Parks Principle Glisan St. SW 4th Urban examples include NORTH PARK BLOCKS Everett St. Portland’s Park Blocks.... 600’ Burnside St. • Maximizes frontage SW Washington properties SW Alder I-405 SW Taylor SW Salmon 600’ SOUTH PARK BLOCKS SW Clay SW Naito SW Market SW Broadway Featured Park Guiding Principle #7 Linear Parks Principle The Park Blocks were set aside by early landowner Daniel Lownsdale in an 1849 survey. The narrow strip of blocks running north and south were substantially west of the city center at the time, but Lownsdale correctly predicted that the city would grow to encompass the park. This 1878 photo shows a remarkable amount of remaining undeveloped land, and the Park blocks still lay somewhat west of the central commercial district. South Park Blocks - Portland, Oregon (1878) South Park Blocks - Portland, Oregon (2002) Guiding Principle #8 Park Size Principle One park of a set area only affects the immediate surrounding properties (sphere of influence) whereas three parks with the same area total as the one park can triple the sphere of influence. Diagram G: Design Rules - Andrew Ross Miller, “Valuing Open Space: Land Economics and Neighborhood Parks.” Guiding Principle #8 Park Size Principle 600’ Radius The Pearl District in NW Pettygrove St. Portland, has been under- THE FIELDS going significant urban re- NW Overton St. 600’ Radius NW 12th Ave. NW 13th Ave. NW 11th Ave. NW 9th Ave. NW 10th Ave. NW 10th newal since the late 1990s, NW Northrup St. TANNER SPRINGS including the removal of a NW Marshall St. viaduct and construction of NW Lovejoy St. 600’ Radius the Portland Streetcar. The NW Kearney St. “Park Blocks” concept was JAMISON SQUARE NW Johnson St. captured in the Peter Walker master plan to NW Irving St. capitalize the frontage NW Hoyt St. property potential on the parks. Featured Park 0 200 400 800 Pearl District Neighborhood - Diagram illustrates the “parkshed’ capture of neighboring properties A look at Park History This isn’t a new idea...
Recommended publications
  • WORKING DOCDRAFT Charter Directors Handbook .Docx
    PPS Resource Guide A guide for new arrivals to Portland and the Pacific Northwest PPS Resource Guide PPS Resource Guide Portland Public Schools recognizes the diversity and worth of all individuals and groups and their roles in society. It is the policy of the Portland Public Schools Board of Education that there will be no discrimination or harassment of individuals or groups on the grounds of age, color, creed, disability, marital status, national origin, race, religion, sex or sexual orientation in any educational programs, activities or employment. 3 PPS Resource Guide Table of Contents How to Use this Guide ....................................................................................................................6 About Portland Public Schools (letter from HR) ...............................................................................7 Acknowledgements ........................................................................................................................8 Cities, Counties and School Districts .............................................................................................. 10 Multnomah County .............................................................................................................................. 10 Washington County ............................................................................................................................. 10 Clackamas County ...............................................................................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • Town Square Park Master Plan Public Hearing Draft
    TOWN SQUARE PARK MASTER PLAN PUBLIC HEARING DRAFT MAY 2019 ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS The Municipality of Anchorage Parks and Recreation Department and the planning team would like to recognize and thank all the individuals and organizations who have worked to create the Town Square Park Master Plan. A special thanks to the members of the Citizen and Technical Advisory Groups for their dedication, insight and assistance. MUNICIPALITY OF CITIZEN ADVISORY ANCHORAGE GROUP MEMBERS PHOTO CREDITS Ethan Berkowitz, Mayor Radhika Krishna Bettisworth North, Erik Jones: cover, contents, 1, 7, 9, 21, 22, 23, 25-26, 28, 30, 33, 37, 42, Chris Schutte, Director of Economic and Shannon Kuhn Community Development 49, 55, 57, 59, 60, 65, 77-78, 78, 85, 87 Dianne Holmes John Rodda, Director of Parks & Recreation Tayna Iden P&R Horticulture Department: 59, 83 Josh Durand, Parks Superintendent Nancy Harbour James Starzec MOA Parks and Recreation, Steve Rafuse: 3, Nina Bonito Romine 4, 7, 8, 11, 13, 14, 17-18, 23 24, 27, 28, 30, PLANNING TEAM Jennifer Richcreek 32, 33, 35, 41, 45, 53, 58, 60, 61-62, 65-66, John Blaine 66, 68, 69, 75, 77, 83, 89, 95, 100 MOA PARKS & RECREATION Darrel Hess Steve Rafuse, Project Manager R&M Consultants, Van Le: 34 BETTISWORTH NORTH TECHNICAL ADVISORS Anchorage Downtown Partnership: 5-6, 17, Mark Kimerer, Landscape Architect 43-44, 57, 79-80, 81-82 Erik Jones, Landscape Designer GROUP MEMBERS R&M CONSULTANTS Jamie Boring Van Le, Planner Elise Huggins Taryn Oleson, Planner Erin Baca Katie Chan, Graphic Designer Sandy Potvin Sharon Chamard
    [Show full text]
  • Fact Sheet 2017
    FACT SHEET 2017 Mission PFM operates world-class farmers markets that contribute to the success of local food growers and producers and create vibrant community gatherings. As a trade association, success for our vendors is our primary objective. Listening and learning from vendors and shoppers produces outstanding farmers markets where vendors prosper and communities thrive. Vision Portland Farmers Market is a catalyst for the nation’s most prosperous, healthy and sustainable food system. A system where: ● Food producers thrive and expand ● All residents have access to farm fresh food ● Farmers markets build, nourish and inspire community. Portland Farmers Market - a nonprofit 501(c)6 organization operated by a small staff and numerous volunteers - is playing a central role in creating this food system and in fostering an economically, ecologically and socially sustainable community. Downtown Portland Farmers Market at Portland State University (Year-Round) Markets South Park Blocks between SW College and SW Montgomery Portland Farmers Market at Shemanski Park South Park Blocks between SW Salmon and SW Main KINK presents Portland Farmers Market at Pioneer Courthouse Square SW Broadway between SW Morrison and SW Yamhill Neighbor Lents International Farmers Market hood Lents Town Center Markets Kenton Portland Farmers Market N Denver Avenue & N McClellan Street King Portland Farmers Market NE 7th and NE Wygant Street between NE Alberta and NE Prescott Northwest Portland Farmers Market NW 19th and NW Everett Street Staff Trudy Toliver, Executive Director Amber Holland, Market Manager Kelly Merrick, Communications Manager More Info portlandfarmersmarket.org flickr.com/photos/portlandfarmersmarket/ facebook.com/portlandfarmersmarket instagram.com/portlandfarmers twitter.com/portlandfarmers 2017 SCHEDULE MARKET DATES HOURS LOCATION Portland Farmers Market Saturdays Year-Round 8:30 a.m.
    [Show full text]
  • District Background
    DRAFT SOUTHEAST LIAISON DISTRICT PROFILE DRAFT Introduction In 2004 the Bureau of Planning launched the District Liaison Program which assigns a City Planner to each of Portland’s designated liaison districts. Each planner acts as the Bureau’s primary contact between community residents, nonprofit groups and other government agencies on planning and development matters within their assigned district. As part of this program, District Profiles were compiled to provide a survey of the existing conditions, issues and neighborhood/community plans within each of the liaison districts. The Profiles will form a base of information for communities to make informed decisions about future development. This report is also intended to serve as a tool for planners and decision-makers to monitor the implementation of existing plans and facilitate future planning. The Profiles will also contribute to the ongoing dialogue and exchange of information between the Bureau of Planning, the community, and other City Bureaus regarding district planning issues and priorities. PLEASE NOTE: The content of this document remains a work-in-progress of the Bureau of Planning’s District Liaison Program. Feedback is appreciated. Area Description Boundaries The Southeast District lies just east of downtown covering roughly 17,600 acres. The District is bordered by the Willamette River to the west, the Banfield Freeway (I-84) to the north, SE 82nd and I- 205 to the east, and Clackamas County to the south. Bureau of Planning - 08/03/05 Southeast District Page 1 Profile Demographic Data Population Southeast Portland experienced modest population growth (3.1%) compared to the City as a whole (8.7%).
    [Show full text]
  • The Fields Neighborhood Park Community Questionnaire Results March-April 2007
    The Fields Neighborhood Park Community Questionnaire Results March-April 2007 A Community Questionnaire was included in the initial project newsletter, which was mailed to over 4,000 addresses in the vicinity of the park site (virtually the entire neighborhood) as well as other interested parties. The newsletter was made available for pick-up at Chapman School and Friendly House and made available electronically as well. A total of 148 questionnaires were submitted, either by mail or on the web, by the April 20 deadline. The following summarizes the results. 1. The original framework plan for the River District Parks suggested three common elements that would link the parks together. Which do you feel should be included in The Fields neighborhood park? 100 90 80 70 60 50 40 30 20 10 0 Boardwalk Pedestrian Gallery Aquifer 2. This park is envisioned as a “neighborhood park no answ er – over two square blocks providing more traditional spaces for neighborhood residents. Do you agree ? with this overall concept? no yes Comments Regarding Question #2 “Traditional Neighborhood Park” #1 - None (of the original “framework concepts” are important What to you mean by "traditional" As long as this park does not become filthy (ie. bad terrain, homeless) like the waterfront, I'm for it. Excellent idea. A traditional park will be a nice complement to the other two parks. I don't know if my selections were recorded above. A continuation of the boardwalk is essential to making the connection between and among the parks. The design of the buildings around the park has narrowed the feeling of openness so it is beginning to look like a private park for the residential buildings surrounding it.
    [Show full text]
  • City of Portland Situation Status Report
    City of Portland Situation Status Report INCIDENT NAME: COVID-19 REPORT #07 (04.02.20 0001) Citywide Readiness Status Full Activation ECC GENERAL PHONE 503-823-2323 OERS # 2020-0528 PREPARED BY KATHRYN HARTINGER, SITUATION UNIT LEAD REPORTING PERIOD 3/31/20 1700 – 4/2/20 1700 What’s new? Look for bold text. Next situation status report out Tuesday afternoon, April 7. Have something to add/update? Bureaus and agencies should send inputs by 10 AM TUESDAY, April 7 to [email protected] with subject line: COVID Situation Update – [Bureau Name]. Reminder that this report will be publicly available online. A. SITUATION SUMMARY COVID-19 Cases Oregon, Multnomah County Multnomah County, by Race & Ethnicity (Source: OHA) (Source: Multnomah County Data Dashboard) 800 100 700 80 600 60 40 Oregon 500 400 20 4 7 81 0 1 13 16 300 0 MultCo 200 100 0 Feb 28 Mar 06 Mar 13 Mar 20 Mar 27 Source: Oregon Health Authority OVERVIEW • Case information is dynamic – current Oregon information is available at the Oregon Health Authority (OHA) website. • Current statistics for United States are on the CDC website. • On March 30, the Oregon Department of Education issued Distance Learning for All Guidance, acknowledging that “there is a very real potential that our students…may not return to school this academic year. This called for a shift from providing Situation Status Report Rev: 4/2/2020 1 supplementary education to Distance Learning for All by April 13. • In a March 31 press release, it was announced that the State of Oregon was expecting a shipment of personal protective equipment (PPE) from FEMA that day.
    [Show full text]
  • PP Annual Report Exec Summary V4.Indd
    2015–16 Dear Portlanders: Thank you for your recent commitment to repairing and improving Portland’s parks. In November 2014, you and an impressive 74 percent of Portlanders voted “Yes” for the Parks Replacement Bond Projects26 underway — the highest percentage ever for a Parks ballot measure. You became part of a long tradition of Portlanders who’ve built and maintained our city’s enviable collection of park facilities. In this fi rst full year of the Bond, from July 2015 to July 2016, we’ve laid the foundation for the work to be done. In this upcoming year, you’ll start to see tangible results in the parks. Replacement of the 70 to 90 year old mechanical systems at Grant Pool was the fi rst completed project, and next year, results will be visible across the city. Project1 completed About every nine years over the last century, Portlanders have invested in increasing, preserving and maintaining our park system by voting “yes” on parks bonds or levies. Before the 2014 bond, the last major bond was in 1994, meaning 20 years passed without signifi cant park improvements or address- ing dire repair needs. Portland Parks & Recreation anticipates a $248 million funding gap for major maintenance needs over the next 10 years. The $68 million in funds from the 2014 Parks Replacement Bond will not address all of these maintenance issues, but it is vital to fi xing, upgrading and replacing the most crucial of these needs. Projects18 ahead of As your Parks Commissioner and Parks Director, we are making sure the funds will be used wisely and schedule maximize benefi ts to the greatest number of park users.
    [Show full text]
  • March 2021/ Volume 34, No
    NW “Digging deep, p. 3 p. 9 p. 15 Café Nell gets Shining a light” Zero-sum Pearl riot stirs fallacy city help help call INSIDE INSIDE MARCH 2021/ VOLUME 34, NO. 7 FREE SERVING PORTLAND’S NORTHWEST NEIGHBORHOODS SINCE 1986 nwexaminer Compassion and Order Stephanie Hansen and Debbie Poitra serve coffee to unhoused residents in Downtown Portland. Photo by Wesley Mahan Homeless people receive $1 a bag to pack up trash, a program of the Neighborhood associations blend Goose Hollow Foothills League underwritten by donations of recy- clables to BottleDrop. A total of 36 supposedly incompatible themes bags were collected one day in late February. Photo by Matt Erceg BY ALLAN CLASSEN Wilhelms lived across the street Another friend, Margaret Jessie, who knew the departed. ouis Wilhelms was not the from the First Unitarian Church in said he was “a good person who The fact that Wilhelms at last got kind of man who ordinarily a tent. He had been homeless for 25 would let people into his tent to get his due owes to the organized com- merits a newspaper obituary. of the last 30 years and got around out of the rain.” passion of Downtown Neighbor- L in a wheelchair after his legs were His date of death was unknown. With those sketchy generalities, hood Association volunteers who No survivors have been identified. amputated due to diabetes. Wilhelms’ death was commemorat- launched the Good Neighbor Pro- His closest associates didn’t know His homeless neighbor, Charles ed Jan. 13 in a singular service gram last year. Teams of residents his date of birth.
    [Show full text]
  • A Report on the 2003 Parks Levy Investment Objective 1: Restore
    A Report on the 2003 Parks Levy Investment In November 2002, Portland voters approved a five-year Parks Levy to begin in July 2003. Levy dollars restored budget cuts made in FY 2002-03 as well as major services and improvements outlined in the Parks 2020 Vision plan adopted by City Council in July 2001. In order to fulfill our obligation to the voters, we identified four key objectives. This report highlights what we have accomplished to date. Objective 1: Restore $2.2 million in cuts made in 2002/03 budget The 2003 Parks Levy restored cuts that were made to balance the FY 2002-03 General Fund budget. These cuts included the closure of some recreational facilities, the discontinuation and reduction of some community partnerships that provide recreational opportunities for youth, and reductions in maintenance of parks and facilities. Below is a detailed list of services restored through levy dollars. A. Restore programming at six community schools. SUN Community Schools support healthy social and cross-cultural development of all participants, teach and model values of respect and inclusion of all people, and help reduce social disparities and inequities. Currently, over 50% of students enrolled in the program are children of color. 2003/04 projects/services 2004/05 projects/services Proposed projects/services 2005/06 Hired and trained full-time Site Coordinators Total attendance at new sites (Summer Continue to develop programming to serve for 6 new PP&R SUN Community Schools: 2004-Spring 2005): 85,159 the needs of each school’s community and Arleta, Beaumont, Centennial, Clarendon, increase participation in these programs.
    [Show full text]
  • Budget Reductions & Urban Forestry Learning Landscapes Plantings
    View this email in your browser Share this URBAN FORESTRY January 2016 Get Involved! | Resources | Tree Permits | Tree Problems | Home In This Issue Budget Reductions & Urban Forestry Learning Landscapes Plantings, Urban Forestry in the Schoolyard Hiring Youth Conservation Crew (YCC) Summer Crew Leader, Apply by Thursday, March 3, 2016 Upcoming Urban Forestry Workshops, Free and Open to the Public Budget Reductions & Urban Forestry You may have recently heard about the upcoming 5% budget cuts proposed for Parks programs. Among the difficult reductions proposed, Urban Forestry could be effected by elimination of the $185,000 Dutch Elm Disease (DED) Treatment program. The City of Portland has minimized the spread of DED and avoided the decimation of the American elm (Ulmus americana) with a successful elm monitoring and treatment program. Without advanced warning, rapid detection and removal, the American elm could ultimately vanish from our landscape. Eastmoreland, Ladd’s Addition, the South Park blocks, Lents Park, Laurelhurst Park, and Overlook Park are areas where elms play a significant role in neighborhood identity. "Many communities have been able to maintain a healthy population of mature elms through a vigilant program of identification and removal of diseased elms and systematic pruning of weakened, dying or dead branches" -Linda Haugen, Plant Pathologist, USDA Forest Service Eliminating this program will also require adjacent property owners to cover the cost of removing DED- infected street trees themselves. The cut will also reduce citywide 24/7 emergency response to clear roads of trees which have fallen during storms, and reduce regular maintenance of publicly-owned trees- additional activities performed by some of the same staff .
    [Show full text]
  • Happy Valley Beaverton Vancouver Damascus Camas
    C O V IN G PLAIN T BLVD O N R TH D UR HA ST 63RD ST FO D EHA R MINN HWY 500 58TH ST E D E V D V R A R E A E D 54TH ST V V N Y R H D E A R A L T L E R I E V 7 O D L N A H D A 3 R S S L 49 nd T TH ST E Isla C N K T O Y 49TH ST 1 H 2 E 2 L A N N S I I R 1 6 N V T H E 1 L 1 E 5 E I I O T 45 R TH ST 1 N I G J ST G 44TH D O U L T N L R E S A F ST 39TH ST L39oTHw Impact Development Practices R S D S R- 500 D A 50 HWY LV U 1 B in the city of Portland V I E 33RD ST IN E I A 28TH ST S L D P 28TH ST V L D R A H U A T V R D U H S N FOURTH PLAIN B L FO LVD T D R B Y 8 T 3 P A gton R Vancouver 3 Burlin 0 S D O 1 W O D D R L 18TH ST V N N E N A A I V TH ST Y A 18 E A U O A R O W S R D M C G M E E B E N N M A E A R V 2 R V C V V D E 3 A N I M A N A N A T I L 2 H E L N V F A LI H PLAIN BLV 9TH ST A H D L a D A M I D y E M H G V T 8TH ST N R d T E A D E e 7 2 E n RGREEN B 2 N 9 L C 7 I V 1 s D 2 1 l A 1 a R 9 Camas R B n T H 1 O d UR C LV B 1ST ST K D LV C D MIL R D L D PLA L E IN B A R R LVD K E E K R R D 7TH S R E T R D D H D R S T S R E I Y O L R W M R S CGI L L E WAS LIV L B HING L R O T A 20TH ST W ON E Y M D B E R LVD E B N V E T 21A1 V C D E A R S O N 9R O G L A R R E E D U G E R M L ON N T B E H IA R K 5 H T S O - W I 4 Y R T P 6 B L A V H 1 34TH ST D T P R 210 O 9 N KAISER Portland 18TH AVE R 209 HWY D l S LO 208 Internationa 14 9 R N MB 9 206 20H7 A O RD 9 D MCINTOSH RD J9 T E W Airport S G205 I ID LL R 9 AM B E D T T D NTOWN R E A A R ERM S E IR G T 3 9 P 3 O B 204 9 R G D LV9 LOMBARD ST T ove R rn D ment Islan F Y d o 5 W CO LU H S r MBI S e A A P s ROSA PARKS WAY B W t LVD A 202 Y D 9 R S U K S MA t Union Y 201 RIN Wes P Portland E S L 9 E LL I 3 5 U SP VI a I RING N 0 KILLINGSWORTH ST 199 197 0 r 196 191495 2 L E 200 D 9 9 I- D k 198 9 R E K V 9 9 E 9 193 D N A 9 192 L W V ES I 9 V R T S 191 B 99 A L 190 189 O E B9 R 9 C U ST .
    [Show full text]
  • 2015 DRAFT Park SDC Capital Plan 150412.Xlsx
    2015 PARK SYSTEM DEVELOPMENT CHARGE 20‐YEAR CAPITAL PLAN (SUMMARY) April 2015 As required by ORS 223.309 Portland Parks and Recreation maintains a list of capacity increasing projects intended to TYPES OF PROJECTS THAT INCREASE CAPACITY: address the need created by growth. These projects are eligible to be funding with Park SDC revenue . The total value of Land acquisition projects summarized below exceeds the potential revenue of $552 million estimated by the 2015 Park SDC Methodology and Develop new parks on new land the funding from non-SDC revenue targeted for growth projects. Expand existing recreation facilities, trails, play areas, picnic areas, etc The project list and capital plan is a "living" document that, per ORS 223.309 (2), maybe modified at anytime. It should be Increase playability, durability and life of facilities noted that potential modifications to the project list will not impact the fee since the fee is not based on the project list, but Develop and improve parks to withstand more intense and extended use rather the level of service established by the adopted Park SDC Methodology. Construct new or expand existing community centers, aquatic facilities, and maintenance facilities Increase capacity of existing community centers, aquatic facilities, and maintenance facilities ELIGIBLE PROJECTS POTENTIAL REVENUE TOTAL PARK SDC ELIGIBLE CAPACITY INCREASING PROJECTS 20‐year Total SDC REVENUE CATEGORY SDC Funds Other Revenue Total 2015‐35 TOTAL Park SDC Eligible City‐Wide Capacity Increasing Projects 566,640,621 City‐Wide
    [Show full text]