DOCSLIB.ORG

Donor to Political Party Disclosure Lndividuals

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Donor to Political Party Disclosure Lndividuals Donor to Political Party Disclosure AEC Return - lndividuals FINANCIAL YEAR 2014-15 The due date for lodging this return is 17 November 2015 Gompleting the Return: o This return is to be completed by a person who made a gift to a registered political party (or a State branch), or to another person or organisation with thé intention of benefiting a registered political party. This return is to be completed with reference to the Financial Disclosure Guide for Donors to Potiticat Parties. ¡ Further information is available at www.aec.ôov.au. o This return will be available for public inspection from Monday 1 February 2016 al www.aec.qov.au. Any supporting documentation included with this return may be treated as part of a public disclosure and displayed on the AEC website. o The information on this return is collected under the Commonweatth ElectoralAct 1918. \' NOTE: This form is for the use of individuals only. Please use the form Political Party Disclosure Return- Organisations if you are completing a retum for an organisation. Details of person that made the donation Name CLIVE FREDERICK PALMER Postal address PO BOX 1538 Suburb/Town BRISBANE QLD 400 Telephone number (07) 38322044 ( ) Email address s. mole@mi neralogyy.com.au Gertification I certify that the information contained in this return and its attachments is true and complete to the best of my knowtedge information and belief. I understand that giving false or misleading information rs a serious offence. Signature Enquiries and retums Funding and Disclosure Phohe: 026271 4552 should be addressed to: Australian Electoral Commission Fax: 0262937655 PO Box6172 Email: [email protected] Kingston ACT 2604 Office use only Date received DAR_1_indiv. (07115) - Page I of 5 Part l: Donations made Detailsof donations madetoa political partytotalling morethan $12 800, between 1 July 2014and 30June20l5. lf the total of donations made to one political party exceeds the disclosure threshold, all donations made to that political party, regardless of their value, must be disclosed. For each donation made, the following details must be disclosed: . Party code* and the address of the political party to which the donation was made o date each donation was made . value of each donation made. Value of donation** (GST inclusive) Name/Party Code PALMER UNITED PARTY Postaladdress GPO BOX 3138 Suburb/town BRISBANE State QLD postcode 4000 Name/Party Code Postal address Suburb/town Name/Party Code Postal address Suburb/town Name/Party Code Postal address Suburb/town Name/Party Code Postal address Suburb/town Name/Party Code Postal address Suburb/town Name/Party Code Postal address Suburb/town lf insufficient space, please attach additionalsheefs. Total $ *A full list of political parties and their party codes is at the end of this form. **Donation is a gift within the meaning of Division 4 - Disclosure of donations, in Part XX the Commonweatth Electorat Act 1918. DAR_1_indiv. (O7115) - Page 2 of 5 Paft 2: Donations received Details of donations of more than $12 800 received and used (wholly or partly) to make the donations disclosed in Part I of this return. The 'donations received' section of this return applies to a donor: . who received a donation of more than $12 800 (whether within the 2014-15 financial year or not); and ¡ used that donation, or part of it, to make donations totalling more than $12 S00 to a political party in the 201 4-1 5 financial year. For donations that meet the disclosure criteria above, the following details must be reported: . full name and address details of the person or organisation from whom the donation was received . date each donation was received. o value or amount of each donation. Postal address Suburb/town State Postcode Name Postal address Suburb/town Name Postal address Suburb/town Name Postal address Suburb/town Name Postal address Suburb/town Name Postal address Suburb/town Name Postal address Suburb/town Name Postal address Suburb/town lf insufficient space, p/ease attach additionalsl,eefs. ** Donation is a gift within the meaning of Division 4 - Disclosure of donations, in Part XX of the Commonwealth ElectoralAct 1918. DAR_1_indiv. (07115) - Page 3 of 5 Registered Political Party and Branch Codes AMEP Australian Motoring Enthusiast Party CODE PartV lBranch PROG Australian Progressives ASP Australian Sex Party ALP.ACT Australian Labor Party (ACT Branch) sov Australian Sovereignty Party ALP.NSW Australian Labor Party (N.S.W. Branch) SPRT Australian Sports Party Australian Labor Party (Northern Territory vcE Australian Voice ALP-NT Party Branch) BTA Bullet Train for Australia ALP.QLD Australian Labor Party (State of Queensland) coP Christian Democratic Party (Fred Nile Group) Australian Labor Party (South Australian ALP-SA Branch) cEc Citizens Electoral Council of Australia ALP.TAS Australian Labor Party (Tasmanian Branch) coK Coke in the Bubblers ALP-VIC Austral¡an Labor Party (Victorian Branch) CAL Country Alliance Australian Labor Party (Western Australian CLP-NT Country Liberals (Northern Territory) Branch) DLRA Drug Law Reform Australia Australian Labor Party (ALP) FUT Future Party Country Labor Party HEM Help End Marijuana Prohibition (HEMP) Party Jacqui Lambie Network Family First Party - QLD John Madigan's Manufacturing and Farming Family First Party SA JMMFP - Party Family First Party - VIC KAP Katter's Australian Party Family First Party LDP Liberal Democratic Party NMP Natural Medicine Party Australian Greens, Australian Capital Territory GRN-ACT Branch XEN Nick Xenophon Group GRN-NSW The Greens NSW NCP Non-Custodial Parents Party (Equal Parenting) GRN.NT Australian Greens, Northern Territory Branch ONA One Nation GRN.QLD Queensland Greens soL Online Direct Democracy - (Empowering the People) GRN.SA Australian Greens (South Australia) ODR Outdoor Recreation Party (Stop the Greens) GRN-TAS Australian Greens, Tasmanian Branch PUP Palmer United Party GRN-VIC Australian Greens, Victorian Branch PIR Pirate Party Australia GRN.WA The Greens (WA) lnc RPA Republican Party of Australia GRN.FED Australian Greens RUA Rise Up Australia Party SPA Party LIB-ACT I liOerat Party of Australia - ACT Division Secular of Australia LIB-NSW lliUerat Party of Australia, NSW Division SUN Seniors United NSW I SFP Shooters and Fishers Party LNP-QLD iLiberal National Party of Queensland LIB-SA lliOerat Party of Australia (S.4. Division) SMK Smokers Rights Party SAL Socialist Alliance SEP Socialist Equality Party ARTS The Arts Party wtKt The Wikileaks Party UNP Uniting Australia Party Náional Party of Australia (S.4.) lnc. VEP Voluntary Euthanasia Party National Party of Australia - Victoria National Party of Australia - N.S.W. National Party of Australia (WA) lnc National Party of Australia SPP #Sustainable Population Party 21C 21"tCentury Australia AJP Animal Justice Party AFP-NSW Australia First Party (NSW) lncorporated FNP Australia's First Nations Political Party ACH Australian Christians cYc Australian Cyclists Party ADVP Australian Defence Veterans Party AEQ Australian Equality Party AUS-IND Australian lndependents DAR_1_indiv. (07115) - Page 4 of 5 Links State Government legislation may place requirements on political donations in addition to federal requirements. Check with your state electoral commission about requirements in your state. New South Wales - Election Funding Authority" htto ://www.efa. nsw. oov.au/ Victorian Electoral Gommission htto ://www. v ec.v ic. æv. a u/ Electoral Commission of Queensland* htto ://www.eco. o I d. gov. au Western Australian Electoral Gommission* Electoral Gommission of South Australia htto://www.ecsa. sa. oov.au/ Tasmanian Electoral Gommission Austral ian Gapital Territo ry Electoral Gomm iss ion" htto :/iwww.elections.act.qov. au Northern Territory Electoral Gommission* htto : //www nt. qov. aulnteo *denotes an organisation that operates a funding and disclosure scheme separate from the Commonwealth disclosure scheme as at June 2014. DAR_I_indiv. (07115)- Page 5 of 5.
Load more

Recommended publications
  • Which Political Parties Are Standing up for Animals?
    Which political parties are standing up for animals? Has a formal animal Supports Independent Supports end to welfare policy? Office of Animal Welfare? live export? Australian Labor Party (ALP) YES YES1 NO Coalition (Liberal Party & National Party) NO2 NO NO The Australian Greens YES YES YES Animal Justice Party (AJP) YES YES YES Australian Sex Party YES YES YES Pirate Party Australia YES YES NO3 Derryn Hinch’s Justice Party YES No policy YES Sustainable Australia YES No policy YES Australian Democrats YES No policy No policy 1Labor recently announced it would establish an Independent Office of Animal Welfare if elected, however its structure is still unclear. Benefits for animals would depend on how the policy was executed and whether the Office is independent of the Department of Agriculture in its operations and decision-making.. Nick Xenophon Team (NXT) NO No policy NO4 2The Coalition has no formal animal welfare policy, but since first publication of this table they have announced a plan to ban the sale of new cosmetics tested on animals. Australian Independents Party NO No policy No policy 3Pirate Party Australia policy is to “Enact a package of reforms to transform and improve the live exports industry”, including “Provid[ing] assistance for willing live animal exporters to shift to chilled/frozen meat exports.” Family First NO5 No policy No policy 4Nick Xenophon Team’s policy on live export is ‘It is important that strict controls are placed on live animal exports to ensure animals are treated in accordance with Australian animal welfare standards. However, our preference is to have Democratic Labour Party (DLP) NO No policy No policy Australian processing and the exporting of chilled meat.’ 5Family First’s Senator Bob Day’s position policy on ‘Animal Protection’ supports Senator Chris Back’s Federal ‘ag-gag’ Bill, which could result in fines or imprisonment for animal advocates who publish in-depth evidence of animal cruelty The WikiLeaks Party NO No policy No policy from factory farms.
    [Show full text]
  • A History of Misconduct: the Case for a Federal Icac
    MISCONDUCT IN POLITICS A HISTORY OF MISCONDUCT: THE CASE FOR A FEDERAL ICAC INDEPENDENT JO URNALISTS MICH AEL WES T A ND CALLUM F OOTE, COMMISSIONED B Y G ETUP 1 MISCONDUCT IN POLITICS MISCONDUCT IN RESOURCES, WATER AND LAND MANAGEMENT Page 5 MISCONDUCT RELATED TO UNDISCLOSED CONFLICTS OF INTEREST Page 8 POTENTIAL MISCONDUCT IN LOBBYING MISCONDUCT ACTIVITIES RELATED TO Page 11 INAPPROPRIATE USE OF TRANSPORT Page 13 POLITICAL DONATION SCANDALS Page 14 FOREIGN INFLUENCE ON THE POLITICAL PROCESS Page 16 ALLEGEDLY FRAUDULENT PRACTICES Page 17 CURRENT CORRUPTION WATCHDOG PROPOSALS Page 20 2 MISCONDUCT IN POLITICS FOREWORD: Trust in government has never been so low. This crisis in public confidence is driven by the widespread perception that politics is corrupt and politicians and public servants have failed to be held accountable. This report identifies the political scandals of the and other misuse of public money involving last six years and the failure of our elected leaders government grants. At the direction of a minister, to properly investigate this misconduct. public money was targeted at voters in marginal electorates just before a Federal Election, In 1984, customs officers discovered a teddy bear potentially affecting the course of government in in the luggage of Federal Government minister Australia. Mick Young and his wife. It had not been declared on the Minister’s customs declaration. Young This cheating on an industrial scale reflects a stepped aside as a minister while an investigation political culture which is evolving dangerously. into the “Paddington Bear Affair” took place. The weapons of the state are deployed against journalists reporting on politics, and whistleblowers That was during the prime ministership of Bob in the public service - while at the same time we Hawke.
    [Show full text]
  • 1 Hyperlinks and Networked Communication: a Comparative
    CORE Metadata, citation and similar papers at core.ac.uk Provided by The Australian National University 1 Hyperlinks and Networked Communication: A Comparative Study of Political Parties Online This is a pre-print for: R. Ackland and R. Gibson (2013), “Hyperlinks and Networked Communication: A Comparative Study of Political Parties Online,” International Journal of Social Research Methodology, 16(3), special issue on Computational Social Science: Research Strategies, Design & Methods, 231-244. Dr. Robert Ackland, Research Fellow at the Australian Demographic and Social Research Institute, The Australian National University, Canberra, Australia *Professor Rachel Gibson, Professor of Politics, Institute for Social Change, University of Manchester, Manchester, UK. *Corresponding author: Professor Rachel Gibson Institute for Social Change University of Manchester, Oxford Road Manchester M13 9PL UK Ph: + 44 (0)161 306 6933 Fax: +44 (0) 161 275 0793 [email protected] Word count: 6,062(excl title page and key words) 2 Abstract This paper analyses hyperlink data from over 100 political parties in six countries to show how political actors are using links to engage in a new form of ‘networked communication’ to promote themselves to an online audience. We specify three types of networked communication - identity reinforcement, force multiplication and opponent dismissal - and hypothesise variance in their performance based on key party variables of size and ideological outlook. We test our hypotheses using an original comparative hyperlink dataset. The findings support expectations that hyperlinks are being used for networked communication by parties, with identity reinforcement and force multiplication being more common than opponent dismissal. The results are important in demonstrating the wider communicative significance of hyperlinks, in addition to their structural properties as linkage devices for websites.
    [Show full text]
  • My Wikileaks Party Inquiry
    My WikiLeaks Party Inquiry by Gary Lord (@Jaraparilla) A full independent review of what really happened to The Wikileaks Party. “I am not a politician.” - Julian Assange. Table of Contents Mandate................................................................................................................................................2 Terms of Reference...............................................................................................................................2 Objectives.............................................................................................................................................2 Scope....................................................................................................................................................2 Methodology.........................................................................................................................................3 Assumptions.........................................................................................................................................3 Review & Approval..............................................................................................................................3 About the Author..................................................................................................................................4 Historical Background..........................................................................................................................5 Party Foundations............................................................................................................................5
    [Show full text]
  • Donor to Political Party Return Form
    Donor to Political Party Disclosure Return – Individuals FINANCIAL YEAR 2014–15 The due date for lodging this return is 17 November 2015 Completing the Return: • This return is to be completed by a person who made a gift to a registered political party (or a State branch), or to another person or organisation with the intention of benefiting a registered political party. • This return is to be completed with reference to the Financial Disclosure Guide for Donors to Political Parties. • Further information is available at www.aec.gov.au. • This return will be available for public inspection from Monday 1 February 2016 at www.aec.gov.au. • Any supporting documentation included with this return may be treated as part of a public disclosure and displayed on the AEC website. • The information on this return is collected under the Commonwealth Electoral Act 1918. NOTE: This form is for the use of individuals only. Please use the form Political Party Disclosure Return- Organisations if you are completing a return for an organisation. Details of person that made the donation Name Postal address Suburb/Town State Postcode Telephone number ( ) Fax number ( ) Email address Certification I certify that the information contained in this return and its attachments is true and complete to the best of my knowledge information and belief. I understand that giving false or misleading information is a serious offence. Signature Date Enquiries and returns Funding and Disclosure Phone: 02 6271 4552 should be addressed to: Australian Electoral Commission Fax: 02 6293 7655 PO Box 6172 Email: [email protected] Kingston ACT 2604 Office use only Date received DAR_1_indiv.
    [Show full text]
  • Short Report
    AUSTRALIAN EPHEMERA COLLECTION FINDING AID FORMED COLLECTION FEDERAL ELECTION CAMPAIGNS, 1901-2014 PRINTED AUSTRALIANA AUGUST 2017 The Library has been actively collecting Federal election campaign ephemera for many years. ACCESS The Australian Federal Elections ephemera may requested by eCall-slip and used through the Library’s Special Collections Reading Room. Readers are able to request files relating to a specific election year. Please note: . 1901-1913 election material all in one box . 1914-1917 election material all in one box OTHER COLLECTIONS See also the collection of related broadsides and posters, and within the PANDORA archive. See also ‘Referenda’ in the general ephemera run. CONTENT AND ARRANGEMENT OF THE COLLECTION 1901 29-30 March see also digitised newspaper reports and coverage from the period 1903 16 December see also digitised newspaper reports and coverage from the period 1906 12 December see also digitised newspaper reports and coverage from the period 1910 13 April see also digitised newspaper reports and coverage from the period Folder 1. Australian Labour Party Folder 2. Liberal Party 1913 31 May see also digitised newspaper reports and coverage from the period Folder 1. Australian Labor Party Folder 2. Liberal Party Folder 3. Other candidates 1914 ― 5 September (double dissolution) see also digitised newspaper reports and coverage from the period Folder 1. Australian Labor Party Folder 2. Liberal Party 1917 5 May see also digitised newspaper reports and coverage from the period Folder 1. Australian Labor Party Folder 2. National Party Folder 3. Other candidates 1919 13 December see also digitised newspaper reports and coverage from the period Folder 1.
    [Show full text]
  • Political Finance in Australia
    Political finance in Australia: A skewed and secret system Prepared by Sally Young and Joo-Cheong Tham for the Democratic Audit of Australia School of Social Sciences The Australian National University Report No.7 Table of contents An immigrant society PAGE ii The opinions expressed in this paper are those of the authors and should not be The Democratic Audit of Australia vii PAGE iii taken to represent the views of either the Democratic Audit of Australia or The Tables iv Australian National University Figures v Abbreviations v © The Australian National University 2006 Executive Summary ix National Library of Australia Cataloguing-in-Publication data 1 Money, politics and the law: Young, Sally. Questions for Australian democracy Political Joo-Cheong Tham 1 Bibliography 2 Private funding of political parties Political finance in Australia: a skewed and secret system. Joo-Cheong Tham 8 ISBN 0 9775571 0 3 (pbk). 3 Public funding of political parties Sally Young 36 ISBN 0 9775571 1 1 (online). 4 Government and the advantages of office 1. Campaign funds - Australia. I. Tham, Joo-Cheong. II. Sally Young 61 Australian National University. Democratic Audit of 5 Party expenditure Australia. III. Title. (Series: Democratic Audit of Sally Young 90 Australia focussed audit; 7). 6 Questions for reform Joo-Cheong Tham and Sally Young 112 324.780994 7 Conclusion: A skewed and secret system 140 An online version of this paper can be found by going to the Democratic Audit of Australia website at: http://democratic.audit.anu.edu.au References and further
    [Show full text]
  • The Charter and Constitution of the Australian Greens May 2020 Charter
    The Charter and Constitution of the Australian Greens May 2020 Charter .......................................................................................................................................................................3 Basis of The Charter ..............................................................................................................................................3 Ecology ..................................................................................................................................................................3 Democracy.............................................................................................................................................................3 Social Justice .........................................................................................................................................................3 Peace ....................................................................................................................................................................3 An Ecologically Sustainable Economy ....................................................................................................................4 Meaningful Work ....................................................................................................................................................4 Culture ...................................................................................................................................................................4
    [Show full text]
  • Week Six Semester Two 2013
    week six semester two 2013 honi soit honi A critique of right- wing commentary p 7 Sex work and social media p 10 First Person: Group Sex p 12 Revue Reviews: Education and Arts p 16 DISCONTENTS The art of listening COKE IN THE 4 BUBBLERS As easy it is to become apathetic about rience that we may never be unlucky individual threads are loathe to be sev- the current state of Australian politics enough to have scarred onto our bodies ered. The warmest fabrics are built from Hannah Ryan and give up altogether, your vote will and minds, but that we may be trusted the collaboration, peaceful coexistence help lessen the possibility of an Abbott- enough to share. If you are trusted with and reciprocity of the threads that com- MALE POLITICIANS’ led government. Use it wisely. But of them, treat the fragments kindly. Some- prise it. Of we, the threads, that hold course, you’ve heard this all before, so times they flicker with structural oppres- the fragile balance of power in our 8 DAUGHTERS I’ll leave it here. Don’t let him win. sion, institutionalised discrimination, daily weaves, that collectively dictate the Matilda Surtees Now, onto more practical matters. and daily struggle. structural integrity of the fabric. Being wrong can be a useful experi- Ask questions. Considerate, relevant And lessons learnt in fraying threads THE JOB ence. When we are wrong, we learn. questions. Listen for the answers that are not fast forgotten. 11 But only if we listen. Last week, a par- explain better than wilful ignorance, Listen for knowledge and understand- INTERVIEW ticularly saddening Facebook argument bigotry, projected insecurities and the ing, empathise with grief, and ask for Anonymous I was lurking got me thinking.
    [Show full text]
  • Optional Preferential Voting for the Australian Senate
    ELECTORAL REGULATION RESEARCH NETWORK/DEMOCRATIC AUDIT OF AUSTRALIA JOINT WORKING PAPER SERIES OPTIONAL PREFERENTIAL VOTING FOR THE AUSTRALIAN SENATE Michael Maley (Associate, Centre For Democratic Institutions, Australian National University) WORKING PAPER NO. 16 (NOVEMBER 2013) 1 Introduction This paper explores the possible use of optional preferential voting (OPV) as a way of dealing with concerns which have been crystallised at the 2013 Australian federal election about the operation of some aspects of the Senate electoral system. Its main emphasis is on the extent to which full preferential voting no longer enables voters to express their preferences truthfully, and the role which OPV could play in correcting this.1 In a number of respects, the election was remarkable. • The 40 vacancies were contested by a record number of candidates, 529. • The percentage of votes polled by parties already represented in the Parliament dropped significantly from 2010. • In five out of the six States, a candidate was elected from a party which had never previously been represented in the federal Parliament. • For the first time ever, the seats in one State, South Australia, were divided between five different parties. • In Victoria, a minor party candidate was elected after having polled only 0.5% of the first preference votes cast in the State. • In Western Australia, a partial recount of ballot papers was ordered, and in the aftermath of its conduct it was revealed by the Australian Electoral Commission (AEC) that some 1,375 ballot papers “all of which had been verified during the initial WA Senate count … could not be located, rechecked or verified in the recount process”.
    [Show full text]
  • JSCEM Submission K Bonham
    Submission to the Joint Standing Committee on Electoral Matters: Inquiry into and report on all aspects of the conduct of the 2013 Federal Election and matters related thereto. by Dr Kevin Bonham, submitted 10 April 2014 Summary This submission concerns the system for voting in Senate elections. Following the 2013 Australian federal elections, the existing Senate system of group ticket voting is argued to be broken on account of the following problems: * Candidates being elected through methods other than genuine voter intention from very low primary votes. * Election outcomes depending on irrelevant events involving uncompetitive parties early in preference distributions. * The frequent appearance of perverse outcomes in which a party would have been more successful had it at some stage had fewer votes. * Oversized ballot papers, contributing to confusion between similarly-named parties. * Absurd preference deals and strategies, resulting in parties assigning their preferences to parties their supporters would be expected to oppose. * The greatly increased risk of close results that are then more prone to being voided as a result of mistakes by electoral authorities. This submission recommends reform of the Senate system. The main proposed reform recommended is the replacement of Group Ticket Voting with a system in which a voter can choose to: * vote above the line for one or more parties, with preferences distributed to those parties and no other; or * vote below the line with preferences to at least a prescribed minimum number of candidates
    [Show full text]
  • Appendices [PDF 993Kb]
    APPENDICES 188 AEC ANNUAL REPORT 2010–11 Appendix A – Resources This appendix provides details of the AEC’s ½½ the Agency Resource Statement, which resources and expenses in 2010–11, as provides information about the various required by the Joint Committee of Public funding sources that the AEC was able to Accounts and Audit Requirements for annual draw on during the year (Table 39) reports for departments, executive agencies ½½ the Expenses by Outcome table showing and FMA Act bodies, June 2011. the detail of Budget appropriations and total The tables in this appendix correspond to resourcing for Outcome 1 (Table 40). tables in the Portfolio Budget Statements for 2010–11: APPENDICES 189 Table 39 Agency Resource Statement, 2010–11 Actual Payments Balance appropriation made remaining for 2010–11 2010–11 2010–11 $’000 $’000 $’000 (a) (b) (a – b) Ordinary Annual Services1 Prior Year Departmental appropriation 16 173 15 670 503 Departmental appropriation2 182 463 179 588 2 875 Section 31 relevant agency receipts 14 437 14 437 - Total 213 073 209 695 3 378 Total ordinary annual services A 213 073 209 695 Other services3 Departmental non-operating Equity injections 2 241 586 1 655 Departmental appropriation2 5 379 3 486 1 893 Previous years’ outputs 6 953 2 619 4 334 Total 14 573 6 691 7 882 Total other services B 14 573 6 691 Total Available Annual Appropriations and payments 227 646 216 386 Special appropriations Special appropriations limited by criteria/ entitlement Commonwealth Electoral Act 1918 (A) 53 163 Special appropriations limited by amount Commonwealth Electoral Act 1918 (D) 9 000 Total special appropriations C 62 163 Special Accounts4 Opening balance - Non-appropriation receipts to Special Accounts 779 Payments made 779 Total Special Account D - Total resourcing (A + B + C + D) 228 425 279 328 Total net resourcing for agency 228 425 279 328 1 Appropriation Bill (No.
    [Show full text]