DOCSLIB.ORG

Study of Cultural and Natural Heritage in Cross-Border Region

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Study of Cultural and Natural Heritage in Cross-Border Region This project is funded by the European Union CROSS‐BORDER COOPERATION PROGRAMME Beyond Borders – Introducing Smart Tourism and Sharing Economy Study of Cultural and Natural Heritage in Cross-Border Region 'This publication was produced with the financial support of the European Union. Its contents are the sole responsibility of Institute for Research in Environment, Civil Engineering and Energy and Biologists of Albania and do not necessarily reflect the views of the European Union' Contents 1. INTRODUCTION ........................................................................................................... 10 1.1 Study objectives ........................................................................................................ 12 1.2 Methodology .................................................................................................................. 12 1.2.1 Methodology of the assessment .................................................................................. 12 2. TOURIST-GEOGRAPHICAL POSITION ......................................................................... 13 2.1. Geographic position ...................................................................................................... 13 3. CURRENT STATE OF NATURAL HERITAGE OF THE REGION ............................... 14 3.1 Protected designated areas ................................................................................................. 14 3.2 Biodiversity of municipalities of Ohrid Region (Ohrid and Struga), Vevcani, Debar, Marovo and Rostuse and Centar Zupa ................................................................................. 19 3.2.1 Biodiversity of municipalities of Ohrid Region (Ohrid and Struga) ...................... 19 3.2.2 Biodiversity of Vevcani .......................................................................................... 24 3.1.3 Biodiversity of Mavrovo and Rostushe .................................................................. 28 3.1.4 Biodiversity of Debar .............................................................................................. 29 3.1.5 Biodiversity of Centar Zupa ................................................................................... 30 3.2. Biodiversity of municipalities Mat, Diber, Bulquize and Klos .................................... 31 3.2.1 Biodiversity of Mat ................................................................................................. 31 3.2.2 Biodiversity of Diber ............................................................................................. 34 3.2.3 Biodiversity of Bulqize ........................................................................................... 37 4. CURRENT STATE OF CULTURAL HERITAGE ............................................................ 38 4.1. Cultural heritage of municipalities Ohrid, Struga, Vevcani, Debar, Centar Zupa and Mavrovo and Rostushe ........................................................................................................ 38 4.1.1 Cultural heritage of municipality Ohrid .................................................................. 38 4.1.2Cultural heritage of municipalities Mavrovo- Rostushe and Centar Zupa .............. 45 4.1.3 Cultural heritage of municipality Debar ................................................................. 48 4.1.4 Cultural heritage of municipality Vevcani .............................................................. 52 4.1.5 Cultural heritage of municipality Struga ................................................................. 54 4.2 Cultural heritage of municipalities Diber,Klos,Mat and Bulquize ................................ 57 4.3 Social, cultural and economic differences ..................................................................... 68 4.4 Current problems with management of natural and cultural heritage ........................... 72 4.4.1 Municipalities: Ohrid Lake Region, Mаvrovo and Rostuse,Vevcani, Debar and Centar Zupa .......................................................................................................................... 72 4.4.2 Municipalities: Mat, Klos , Bulquize and Diber ..................................................... 77 4.5 The impact of tourism .................................................................................................... 7 8 4.6 Tourism infrastructure planning and management ....................................................... 81 4.7 Marketing, branding and access to information ............................................................ 83 4.7.1 Mobile App for tourism marketing ........................................................................ 84 2 4.7. 2 Instagram for Tourism Marketing .............................................................................. 85 5. FACTORS FOR DEVELOPMENT OF TOURISM ........................................................... 88 7. TOURISM NICHES ............................................................................................................ 9 4 7.1. Municipality of Ohrid ................................................................................................... 9 7 7.1.1 Attraction ................................................................................................................ 97 7.1.2 Experience.............................................................................................................. 98 7.2 MUNICIPALITY OF STRUGA.................................................................................. 106 7.2.1 Attraction .............................................................................................................. 106 7.2.2 Expirience ............................................................................................................. 107 7.3 MUNICIPALITY OF VEVCANI................................................................................ 110 7.3.1 Attraction .............................................................................................................. 110 7.3.2 Expirience ............................................................................................................. 111 7.4 MUNICIPALITY OF DEBAR ................................................................................... 115 7.4.1 Attraction .............................................................................................................. 115 7.4.2 Expirinece ............................................................................................................. 116 7.5 Municipality of Mavrovo and Rostushe ..................................................................... 116 7.5.1 Attraction .............................................................................................................. 117 7.5.2 Expirience ............................................................................................................. 118 7.6 Municipality of Centar Zupa ........................................................................................ 121 7.6.1 Attraction .............................................................................................................. 121 7.6.2 Expiriences ............................................................................................................ 122 8. BENEFITS OF TOURISM FOR LOCAL COMMUNITIES: ......................................... 127 9. CONDUCTING RESEARCH IN CBC –NORTH MACEDONIA AND ALBANIA ...... 129 9.1. Results from the survey conducted in Municipalities of Ohrid, Struga,Vevcani,Centar Zupa,Debar and Mavrovo and Rostushe ............................................................................ 129 9.2. Results from the survey conducted in Municipalities Mat, Klos, Bulqize and Diber 146 10 . RECOMMENDATION .................................................................................................. 159 10.1 Steps towards effective cross-border cooperation in natural and cultural heritage protection ............................................................................................................................... 159 10.2 How to bring cultural and natural heritage and sustainable tourism together: challenges at regional level ................................................................................................ 168 11.CONCLUSION ................................................................................................................. 169 12. REFERENCES : .............................................................................................................. 172 12. ANNEX............................................................................................................................ 174 QUESTIONNAIRE FOR THE NATURAL AND CULTURAL HERITAGE IN THE CROSS BOARD REGION OF MK/AL ................................................................................ 175 3 Table of figures: Figure 1. UNESCO world cultural and natural heritage (Ohrid Lake Region) ....................... 10 Figure 2. Specific obejctives of sustaianble tourism ............................................................... 12 Figure 3.Geographic position of the municipalities ................................................................. 13 Figure 5.Protected areas in the right side of the border ........................................................... 15 Figure 6. National park Galicica infographic .......................................................................... 18 Figure 7. Monument of
Load more

Recommended publications
  • Regjistri I Koleksioneve Ex Situ Të Bankës Gjenetike
    UNIVERSITETI BUJQËSOR I TIRANËS INSTITUTI I RESURSEVE GJENETIKE TË BIMËVE REGJISTRI I KOLEKSIONEVE EX SITU TË BANKËS GJENETIKE Tiranë, 2017 UNIVERSITETI BUJQËSOR I TIRANËS INSTITUTI I RESURSEVE GJENETIKE TË BIMËVE REGJISTRI I KOLEKSIONEVE EX SITU TË BANKËS GJENETIKE Përgatiti: B. Gixhari Botim i Institutit të Resurseve Gjenetike të Bimëve http://qrgj.org Tiranë, 2017 Regjistri i “KOLEKSIONEVE EX SITU” të Bankës Gjenetike është hartuar në kuadër të informimit të publikut të interesuar për Resurset Gjenetike të Bimëve në Shqipëri. Regjistri përmban informacione për gjermoplazmën bimore të grumbulluar/ koleksionuar gjatë viteve në pjesë të ndryshme të Shqipërisë dhe që ruhet jashtë vendorigjinës së tyre (ex situ) nga Banka Gjenetike Shqiptare. Në të dhënat e paraqitura në këtë regjistër janë treguesit (deskriptorët) e domosdoshëm të pasaportës së aksesioneve të bimëve të koleksionuara si: numri i aksesionit (ACCENUMB), numri i koleksionimit (COLLNUMB), kodi i koleksionimit (COLLCODE), emërtimi i pranuar taksonomik (TaxonName_Accepted), emri i aksesionit (ACCENAME), data e pranimit (ACQDATE), vendi i origjinës (ORIGCTY), vendi i koleksionimit (COLLSITE), gjerësia gjeografike (LATITUDE), gjatësia gjeografike (LONGITUTE), lartësia mbi nivelin e detit (ELEVATION) dhe data e koleksionimit (COLLDATE). Në koleksionet në ruajtje ex situ përfshihen aksesione të bimëve të kultivuara, aksesione të formave bimore lokale të njohura si varietete të vjetër të fermerit ose landrace, aksesione të pemëve frutore, të bimëve foragjere, bimëve industriale, bimëve mjekësore dhe aromatike dhe të bimëve të egra. Pjesa më e madhe e gjermoplazmës që ruhet në formën ex situ i përket formave të vjetra lokale ose varietetet e fermerit, të njohura për vlerat e tyre kryesisht cilësore, që janë përdorur në bujqësinë shqiptare dekada më parë, por që aktualisht përdoren në sipërfaqe të kufizuara ose nuk përdoren më në strukturën e bujqësisë intensive.
    [Show full text]
  • Ohrid the City Where the Cultural Embraces the Natural Heritage
    OHRID THE CITY WHERE THE CULTURAL EMBRACES THE NATURAL HERITAGE MANAGEMENT PLAN OF THE MUNICIPALITY OF OHRID FOR WORLD HERITAGE PROPERTY: NATURAL AND CULTURAL HERITAGE OF THE OHRID REGION (within the territory of the Municipality of Ohrid) 2014-2020 1 2 MANAGEMENT PLAN OF THE MUNICIPALITY OF OHRID FOR WORLD HERITAGE PROPERTY: NATURAL AND CULTURAL HERITAGE OF THE OHRID REGION (within the territory of the Municipality of Ohrid) 2014-2020 3 4 MANAGEMENT PLAN OF THE MUNICIPALITY OF OHRID FOR WORLD HERITAGE PROPERTY: NATURAL AND CULTURAL HERITAGE OF THE OHRID REGION (within the territory of the Municipality of Ohrid) 2014-2020 5 6 The Management Plan 2014-2020 has been funded by EU funds of the Project SUSTCULT: “Achieving SUSTainability through an integrated approach to the management of CULTural heritage” – South-East Europe Transnational Cooperation Programme. 7 8 Contents 1 Introduction 11 2 Planning Methodology 15 3 The World Heritage property: Natural and cultural heritage of the Ohrid region 19 3.1 Basic Data 20 3.2 Criteria for inscription on the world heritage list 20 3.3 The territory of the Municipality of Ohrid within the boundaries of the WHP Ohrid region 22 3.3.1 Buffer zone 23 3.4 Outstanding Universal Value 23 3.4.1 Statement of Significance 23 4 Management Plan of the Municipality of Ohrid for WHP: Natural and Cultural Heritage of the Ohrid region (within the territory of the Municipality of Ohrid) 27 4.1 The Management plan for the World Natural and Cultural Heritage of the Ohrid region 28 4.2 The Main Aim and Need for Management
    [Show full text]
  • Local Governance Mapping in Albania 2020
    LOCAL GOVERNANCE MAPPING IN ALBANIA 2020 Funded by the European Union Governance Perception in a Reforming Albania Nationwide Local Governance Mapping in Albania 2020 AUTHORS IDRA Research & Consulting and Human Development Promotion Center (HDPC) Funded by the European Union Disclaimer STAR2 - Consolidation of Territorial and Administrative Reform - is a project funded by the European Union, Sweden, Italy, Switzerland, USAID, UNDP and the Government of Albania. The project's implementing partner is the Minister of Interior. The project is implemented by the United Nations Development Program (UNDP) Oce in Albania. This report has been drafted in the framework of the above project by IDRA. The presented results are obtained from the calculation of the perceptions and evaluations expressed by the participants in the assessment, selected through the procedure described in the Methodology of this study. The views, comments and opinions expressed in this report do not necessarily reect the views of the aforemen- tioned institutions. 4 LOCAL GOVERNANCE MAPPING IN ALBANIA ACKNOWLEDGEMENT This report is funded by STAR2 and implemented by a consortium composed of IDRA Research & Consulting (leader), Human Development and Promo- tion Centre - HDPC (member – involved in data analysis and report writing) and Gender Alliance for Development Centre – GADC (member – involved in data collection). The report acknowledges the joint eorts of all organiza- tions involved. The authors would like to thank UNDP Albania local governance team, STAR2 project sta, the Ministry of Interior and the Agency for Support of Local Self-governance in Albania for their valuable guidance on the local governance mapping methodology, coordination with dierent central government and municipal stakeholders and helpful comments and suggestions throughout the exercise.
    [Show full text]
  • L92427008F Tropojë J98021904S Klos Bulqizë K37513881M
    Nr Nr. Leje Date Emri i subjektit Nipt Bashkia Emertimi i vendburimit Lloji i Mineralit S=km2 1 126/1 11.01.1995 Kumega shpk J68118904D Mat Dukagjin, Rrethi Mat Kuarc 0.006 Oskeola shpk.(Ish Kuarci- Bllacë Vrith, Pukë 2 223/1 18.12.1995 K81407085C Pukë Krom 0.027 shpk) 3 226 26.12.1995 INERTOBETONI shpk J64228817E Sarandë Lukovë Sarandë (Gur gëlqeror) Gur gëlqeror 0.1820 4 232/2 29.12.1995 GLOBAL-CHROME shpk L92427008F Tropojë Maja e Gjate 2 Krom 0.01 5 234/1 29.12.1995 Bledi shpk K36811904G Tropojë Qafe Prushit 3 Krom 0.019 6 253 01.04.1996 XHIRETON shpk J71909005P Bulqizë Mali Lopes Krom 0.045 7 276 15.05.1996 OFMAN shpk J68117219D Kukës Bria e Minit, afer Surroj-t Krom 0.0007 8 297/1 24.06.1996 MALI shpk K08906611T Tropojë Per minieren e Ragam 2 Krom 0.02 9 349/2 11.02.1997 Guri I Arte shpk M01413034G Tropojë Objekti Kallmisht Krom 0.012 10 355/1 17.06.1997 Selenice Bitumi K16815202M Selenicë Selenice Bitum, Zhavor Bituminoz 1.543 11 390/1 22.01.1998 ROMSI shpk J86510257N Selenicë Vidhat e Haxhiut Zhavor Bituminoz 0.099 Afrimi-K Shpk (Ish FLORIDA 12 442 19.02.1999 K07713216Q Tropojë Maja e Lajthizes Krom 0.072 shpk) 13 447/1 19.02.1999 Besjana Sh.p.k K07729915P Klos Qafe e Burrelit Krom 0.076 14 450/1 24.02.1999 KURTI shpk K07729906Q Dibër Vanas Krom 0.02 15 458/4 19.03.1999 ATEANI MINING shpk L88520901F Bulqizë Liqeni I Sopeve Z= +1680 e poshte Krom 1.691 16 459/1 26.03.1999 LESHNICA shpk K67617205B Kukës Leshnice Krom 0.015 17 463 08.04.1999 SHKALLA shpk J98021904S Klos Shkalle, Klos Krom 0.333 18 464/1 04.05.1999 Jaho Mat shpk K07729917I
    [Show full text]
  • Kontrata Të Lidhura - Thirrja 2, Projekti I Bankës Boterore
    KONTRATA TË LIDHURA - THIRRJA 2, PROJEKTI I BANKËS BOTERORE "Masa për Zhvillimin dhe Mbrojtjen e Pyjeve" Nr Associations/Individ ID Aplicant Region Bashkia Date of Contract Shoqata e Perdoruesve te Pyjeve dhe 1 02/1/08/0008 Kukes Has 02.09.2019 Kullotave Komunale Golaj 2 Petro Cuni (individ) 02/2/05/0009 Fier Fier 30.08.2019 Shoqata e Perdorusve e Pyjeve e 3 02/1/10/0011 Shkoder Malesi e Madhe 03.09.2019 kullotave Lepusha Shoqata e perdoruesve te pyjeve dhe 4 02/1/04/0013 Elbasan Elbasan 30.08.2019 kullotave "Braneshi" 5 Shoqata Mjedisore Tropoja e Gjelber 02/1/08/0014 Kukes Tropoje 03.09.2019 Shoqata e Përdoruesve të Burimeve 6 02/1/02/0016 Diber Klos 27.08.2019 Natyrore "GJELBERIMI" Shoqata e Përdoruesve të Pyjeve dhe 7 Kullotave Bashkiake“KORAVI”, Njësia 02/1/10/0024 Shkoder Fushe Arrez 30.08.2019 Administrative Qafë Mali, Fushë Arrëz Shoqata e perdoruesve Pyjeve dhe 8 02/1/11/0027 Tirane Kavaje 26.08.2019 Kullotave, Helmas Shoqata e perdoruesve te pyjeve dhe 9 02/1/04/0029 Elbasan Cerrik 30.08.2019 kullotave KALAJA Shoqata e Perdorimit te Pyjeve dhe 10 Kullotave Komunale, Burimeve Natyrore 02/1/02/0032 Diber Mat 28.08.2019 Ulez Shoqata e Perdoruesve te Pyjeve dhe 11 02/1/02/0036 Diber Bulqize 27.08.2019 Kullotave Gjorice Shoqata e Perdorimit te Pyjeve e 12 02/1/02/0037 Diber Mat 30.08.2019 Kullotave Rukaj 13 Agron Bregu AGRODESIGN 02/1/07/0042 Korce Kolonje 30.08.2019 Shoqata e Perdoruesve te Pyjeve dhe 14 02/1/08/0044 Kukes Kukes 30.08.2019 Kullotave Komunale Bushtrice 15 Mjedis, Ujera, Pyje 02/1/06/0046 Gjirokaster Kelcyre 26.08.2019
    [Show full text]
  • Bashkia Burrel,Njesia Administrative Baz,Derjan,Macukull,Komsi,Lis,Rukaj,Ulez Monitoruar: Bashkia Klos, Me Njesite Administrative Gurre,Klos,Suc,Xiber
    Shtojca nr.3 Raporti i ndërmjetëm i Monitoruesve I. Përmbledhje Vëzhguesi: (Emri, mbiemri) Rajoni/ Komuna e Bashkia Burrel,njesia administrative Baz,Derjan,Macukull,Komsi,Lis,Rukaj,Ulez monitoruar: Bashkia Klos, me njesite administrative Gurre,Klos,Suc,Xiber Subjektet zgjedhore të Partia Socialiste, Partia Demokratike monitoruar: Periudha e mbuluar nga 01.04.2021- 10.04.2021 raporti: Data e dorëzimit të 10 Prill 2021 raportit: Nënshkrimi Shënim: për Seksionin II (monitorimi i aktiviteteve të fushatës), një raport monitorimi i veçantë duhet të plotësohet për secilin subjekt zgjedhor, duke përdorur formularin e dhënë. Për seksionin III (monitorimi i abuzimit/ keqpërdorimit të burimeve shtetërore), një raport duhet të plotësohet për të gjithë zonën gjeografike të monitoruar. II. SUBJEKTI ZGJEDHOR –AKTIVITETET E MONITORUARA TË FUSHATËS Një raport monitorimi i veçantë duhet të plotësohet për secilin subjekt zgjedhor, duke përdorur formularin e mëposhtëm. Raporti i Monitorimit për Subjektin Zgjedhor _Partia Socialiste, Partia Demokratike_ (shtoni emrin e subjektit zgjedhor) 1. Përmbledhja e aktiviteteve të monitoruara të subjektit zgjedhor Lloji i aktivitetit të Detaje Parregullsi për tu përmendur këtu dhe për monitoruar tu identifikuar më vonë a) Zyrat elektorale Numri dhe vendndodhja e zyrave elektorale të Te marra me qera, por ende nuk jane funksionale monitoruara b) Ngjarjet e Fushatës Numri i aktiviteteve të monitoruara të fushatës të Jo organizuara nga subjekti zgjedhor të cilatu monitoruan c) Materialet Numri i materialeve të monitoruara (të bashkangjiten Jo propagandistike mostra/foto për secilen) Numri i materialeve vizive propagandistike të shqyrtuara Jo për përfshirjen e shënimit: ‘Prodhuar nën përgjegjësinë ligjore të …’ d) Monitorimi i Faqeve te Identifikimi i platformave të faqeve të internetit Te dyja partite kan facebook gjithashtu dhe Internetit kandidatet kane faqet e tyre ku postoje rreth fushates.
    [Show full text]
  • The Aromanians in Macedonia
    Macedonian Historical Review 3 (2012) Македонска историска ревија 3 (2012) EDITORIAL BOARD: Boban PETROVSKI, University of Ss. Cyril and Methodius, Macedonia (editor-in-chief) Nikola ŽEŽOV, University of Ss. Cyril and Methodius, Macedonia Dalibor JOVANOVSKI, University of Ss. Cyril and Methodius, Macedonia Toni FILIPOSKI, University of Ss. Cyril and Methodius, Macedonia Charles INGRAO, Purdue University, USA Bojan BALKOVEC, University of Ljubljana,Slovenia Aleksander NIKOLOV, University of Sofia, Bulgaria Đorđe BUBALO, University of Belgrade, Serbia Ivan BALTA, University of Osijek, Croatia Adrian PAPAIANI, University of Elbasan, Albania Oliver SCHMITT, University of Vienna, Austria Nikola MINOV, University of Ss. Cyril and Methodius, Macedonia (editorial board secretary) ISSN: 1857-7032 © 2012 Faculty of Philosophy, University of Ss. Cyril and Methodius, Skopje, Macedonia University of Ss. Cyril and Methodius - Skopje Faculty of Philosophy Macedonian Historical Review vol. 3 2012 Please send all articles, notes, documents and enquiries to: Macedonian Historical Review Department of History Faculty of Philosophy Bul. Krste Misirkov bb 1000 Skopje Republic of Macedonia http://mhr.fzf.ukim.edu.mk/ [email protected] TABLE OF CONTENTS 7 Nathalie DEL SOCORRO Archaic Funerary Rites in Ancient Macedonia: contribution of old excavations to present-day researches 15 Wouter VANACKER Indigenous Insurgence in the Central Balkan during the Principate 41 Valerie C. COOPER Archeological Evidence of Religious Syncretism in Thasos, Greece during the Early Christian Period 65 Diego PEIRANO Some Observations about the Form and Settings of the Basilica of Bargala 85 Denitsa PETROVA La conquête ottomane dans les Balkans, reflétée dans quelques chroniques courtes 95 Elica MANEVA Archaeology, Ethnology, or History? Vodoča Necropolis, Graves 427a and 427, the First Half of the 19th c.
    [Show full text]
  • Albania Case Study Mm.Indd
    Introducing a Natural Family Planning Method in Albania INTRODUCTION ALBANIA is a country in Today’s Albanian women and men struggle to balance elements of history Eastern Europe. It is bordered and tradition within the modern world when it comes to their reproductive by Greece to the south-east, choices. Albania saw its fertility rate rise from six children per women in Montenegro to the north, the 1945, to a high of nearly seven by 1960. After 1960 the rate began to decline disputed territory of Kosovo to and reached three children per woman by 1990.i The nation’s communist the northeast, and the Republic Government (1945-1992), while not explicitly pro-natalist like some if its of Macedonia to the east. It has a neighbors, did ban contraception and abortion. Albania is a society with coast on the Adriatic Sea to the historically high fertility, due largely to rigid patriarchal norms. Though west, and on the Ionian Sea to the Government claimed that rapid population growth was a prerequisite the southwest. It is less than of strong economic growth, three of its policies would have the effect of 72 km (45 miles) from Italy, reducing fertility (though this was not their intent): increased education across the Strait of Otranto for women (today, fewer than 5 percent of men and women are illiterate; 92 percent of Albanian women could not read or write in 1945), increased which links the Adriatic Sea to employment for women, and improved health care that allowed far more the Ionian Sea. infants and children to survive.
    [Show full text]
  • Arumanian Has Had an Admirative! Victor A. Friedman University of Chicago* Indiana Slavic Studies, Vol
    1 Surprise! Surprise! Arumanian Has Had an Admirative! Victor A. Friedman University of Chicago* Indiana Slavic Studies, Vol. 7, 1994. 79-89. The development of marked status categories -- i.e. verb forms and usages specifying the speaker's level of commitment to the truth of the utterance and referred to by terms such as evidentia reported, dubitative, admirative, witnessed, etc. -- has never figured in the catalogue of ˆclassi Balkanisms. This can be attributed largely to their apparent absence from Greek (but cf. Besevlie 1928) and Balkan Romance,1 coupled with their elusive nature; unlike obvious phenomena such a definite articles, modal subordinators, future auxiliaries and numeral formation, status categories ar difficult to define -- as seen in the voluminous literature that has evolved around them -- and sometimes even to identify -- as seen in the fact that they are not mentioned in the earliest grammars o the languages in which they are attested (cf. Pa˘rvev 1975, Ismajli 1982, Kastrati 1980). Moreover due to their expressive semantic nature, marked nonconfirmative status categories and usages ar absent or rare in textual sources, especially ordinary narrative prose. In their studies of Balka linguistics, Sandfeld (1930:119-120), Feuillet (1986:67), and Schaller (1975:79, 94) all treat the Albanian and Balkan Slavic phenomena as a bilateral correspondence at best.2 To this can be adde the fact that in the decades since Sandfeld's epochal study, the various Balkan languages hav achieved significant degrees of standardization, with the result that the surveys conducted in recen decades rely mainly on literary sources rather than the dialectal material that was the basis of earli works.3 Thus, for example, recent investigations generally take standard Romanian as representativ of Balkan Romance as a whole.
    [Show full text]
  • Environmental Impacts
    E4482 V4 Public Enterprise for State Roads Environmental and Social Assessment Report Public Disclosure Authorized PUBLIC ENTERPRISE FOR STATE ROADS Republic of Macedonia Public Disclosure Authorized NATIONAL AND REGIONAL ROADS REHABILITATION PROJECT Final Environmental and Social Assessment Report (ESAR) and Environmental Management Plan (EMP) for rehabilitation of State road R1202, Section Boshkov Most - Debar Public Disclosure Authorized Public Disclosure Authorized March 2014 Geing Krebs und Kifer International and others ltd 1 Public Enterprise for State Roads Environmental and Social Assessment Report Table of contents 1. EXECUTIVE SUMMARY AND CONCLUSION ............................... 3 2. POLICY, LEGAL AND ADMINISTRATIVE FRAMEWORK ........................ 4 3. PROJECT DESCRIPTION ........................................... 7 4. BASELINE DATA ................................................ 9 LOCATION ST.NIKOLA - LOCATION IN MAVROVO WHERE NECROPOLIS FROM THE LATE MIDDLE AGE WAS DISCOVERED. THIS LOCATION IS NEAR THE VILLAGE CHURCH ST.NIKOLA, AND UNDER THE ROAD THERE ARE STONE PLATES FROM GRAVES AND ARCHAIC CROSSES, MADE FROM LIMESTONE. ........................................................................................................................................................ 19 5. ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACTS ........................................ 20 5.1 AIR EMISSIONS ................................................................................................................................................... 20 5.2 WATER
    [Show full text]
  • On the Basis of Article 65 of the Law on Real Estate Cadastre („Official Gazette of Republic of Macedonia”, No
    On the basis of article 65 of the Law on Real Estate Cadastre („Official Gazette of Republic of Macedonia”, no. 55/13), the Steering Board of the Agency for Real Estate Cadastre has enacted REGULATION FOR THE MANNER OF CHANGING THE BOUNDARIES OF THE CADASTRE MUNICIPALITIES AND FOR DETERMINING THE CADASTRE MUNICIPALITIES WHICH ARE MAINTAINED IN THE CENTER FOR REC SKOPJE AND THE SECTORS FOR REAL ESTATE CADASTRE IN REPUBLIC OF MACEDONIA Article 1 This Regulation hereby prescribes the manner of changing the boundaries of the cadastre municipalities, as well as the determining of the cadastre municipalities which are maintained in the Center for Real Estate Cadastre – Skopje and the Sectors for Real Estate Cadastre in Republic of Macedonia. Article 2 (1) For the purpose of changing the boundaries of the cadastre municipalities, the Government of Republic of Macedonia shall enact a decision. (2) The decision stipulated in paragraph (1) of this article shall be enacted by the Government of Republic of Macedonia at the proposal of the Agency for Real Estate Cadastre (hereinafter referred to as: „„the Agency„„). (3) The Agency is to submit the proposal stipulated in paragraph (2) of this article along with a geodetic report for survey of the boundary line, produced under ex officio procedure by experts employed at the Agency. Article 3 (1) The Agency is to submit a proposal decision for changing the boundaries of the cadastre municipalities in cases when, under a procedure of ex officio, it is identified that the actual condition/status of the boundaries of the cadastre municipalities is changed and does not comply with the boundaries drawn on the cadastre maps.
    [Show full text]
  • Report PRO МАВРОВО, Final 25 Nov 2010 G. Angl
    PROJECT: PROTECTION OF ENVIRONMENT, ECONOMICAL DEVELOPMENT AND PROMOTION OF SUSTAINABLE ECO- TOURIZAM IN THE NATIONAL PARK MAVROVO TOPIC: ORNITHOFAUNA OF THE NP MAVROVO Contractor: UCODEP, Unity and cooperation for the development of peoples SEO, Prof. D-r Branko Micevski Skopje , November 2010 Content ABBREVIATIONS USED. .3 1 INTRODUCTION. .. 4 2. Current Situation. 4 a) History of the knowledge for the avifauna of the NPM. .. .5 b) Current situation of knowledge of the avifauna of the NPM (the first report of the work of the project off of Mavrovo NP). 7 3. Biology and Distribution of Bird Species in NP MAVROVO. .11 4. THREATS TO BIRDS OF NPM. 64 5. EFFECTIVE PROTECTION OF BIRDS IN NP MAVROVO. .. .65 6. LONG-TERM PROGRAM FOR THE BIRDS OF MONITIRING MAVROVO NP . 67 7. CONCLUSIONS. .. .71 ANNEXES TO THE REPORT. .. 71 References . 71 ___________________________________________________________________________ 2 USED ABBREVIATIONS SPEC - species of European importance for protection; SPEC 1 - Species of highest priority for protection because it is a globally threatened species; SPEC 2 - species that are globally threatened, have inadequate protection status (E, V, R, D, L, Ins.) and are concentrated in Europe; SPEC 3 - species that are globally threatened, have inadequate protection status (E, V, R, D, L, Ins.) and are not concentrated in Europe; SPEC 4 - species that are globally threatened, have satisfactory protection status or S (S) and are concentrated in Europe. Non SPEC-species that are globally threatened, have satisfactory protection
    [Show full text]