The Biological Future of Theoretical Physics CurS Callan Princeton University

Total Page:16

File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

The Biological Future of Theoretical Physics Cur�S Callan Princeton University The Biological Future of Theoretical Physics Cur.s Callan Princeton University The very success of theore.cal physics in elucidang the structure of maer at the smallest scales, and of the universe at the largest scales, has made the future course of this discipline uncertain. At the same .me, the new ability of biological experiment to produce massive data is creang an urgent need for mathemacal frameworks in biology of the kind theore.cal physics has tradi.onally provided for physical science. These overlapping “crises” offer a golden opportunity for both disciplines to collaborate. I will expand on this theme, and sketch some specific examples of how theore.cal physicists are taking up this challenge. Who am I and why am I here? (w. apologies to Adm. Stockdale!) • I used to be a theore.cal par.cle physicist .. wri.ng papers like these: – Worldsheet Approach to Hetero.c Solitons and Instantons – Brane Dynamics from the Born-Infeld Acon – D-Brane Approach to Black Hole Quantum Mechanics. • But about ten years ago I started wri.ng papers like this: – Precise physical models of protein-DNA interac.on from high-throughput data – Informaon capacity of gene.c regulatory elements – Quan.fying selec.on in immune receptor repertoires • I am occasionally asked why I did this .. why did I “switch” to biology? – Not really because of any dissasfac.on with “main stream” theore.cal physics – Rather that pioneering biophysics colleagues (Bialek, Leibler) showed me that biology poses fascinang ques.ons for theory, and that the .me is ripe to aack them. • On reflec.on, though, it seems to me that biology and theore.cal physics have both come to a “crisis” that offers opportuni.es for both subjects. – My purpose tonight is to explain what I mean by this and to give you some concrete no.on of what theore.cal physicists are doing to respond. – I am here for the “Quan.tave Immunology” program (largely populated by theore.cal physicists) … my talk may explain why KITP is hos.ng such an event! Theore.cal Physics is Hugely Ambi.ous! It comprehends a lot. But some things escape its net: It describes how It describes the our universe behavior of inanimate came from the maer everywhere in Big Bang. our universe Thanks to NASA for the image The primary task of theoretical physics • To discover the fundamental, mathemacally expressed, Laws of Nature … as well as the “stuff” that obeys those laws .. in our universe (?). • These laws are valid within broad domains of phenomena and are in some sense “simple”; o^en fit handily on a postcard in shorthand form. • They were discovered in steps over recent centuries: – Newtonian mechanics & the gravitaonal force law (1670s) – Maxwell’s equaons of e&M (1860s) (and special relavity) – einstein’s general relavity (gravity as dynamical geometry) (1910s) – Quantum mechanics of electrons, atoms and molecules (1920s) – Quantum field theory and the Standard Model of everything (1970s) – “Big Bang” cosmology and a theory of the origin of our universe (2000s) • The culminaon of this development, the outcome of an explosion of discovery over the last 50 years, is the Standard Model of our world. – It is a precise mathemacal theory whose scope is … everything. – Some modesty is of course in order, but a victory lap or two is jus.fied. The Standard Model Consensus Fi^y years ago, there was no agreement on the fundamental nature of maer, on the physical theory governing that maer, or how the universe worked. Over .me, a “picture” and “theory” of maer and the universe came together (on two tracks): The par.cle physics track: A specific quantum field theory of the strong, weak and electromagne.c interac.ons between three “generaons” of point-like quarks and leptons; forces mediated by “gauge” gluons, photons, and the W/Z, with a Higgs boson doing symmetry breaking and mass generaon. Some 21 parameters (that could have been different) completely define the whole thing. Total agreement with many and varied experiments. The search for “cons.tuents” could stop here! The cosmology track: The recession of the galaxies suggests a “Big Bang” origin for the universe. The exploraon of its thermal “aerglow” (cosmic microwave background now at 2.75 K) revealed how the universe was cons.tuted in its earliest seconds of existence. Two surprises came out: the maer of par.cle physics is there, but is a minority player in the energy census: “dark maer” and “dark energy” dominate, but seem to act on the world only via gravity. This explains many puzzles of astronomy and also how today’s universe coalesced from the Big Bang The Standard Model of particle physics We have a very specific quantum field theory of how these point par.cle cons.tuents interact. The quarks are not seen directly: they are “confined”, combining in triples to make neutrons, protons etc. Our ability to calculate specific results from in this theory is limited, but good enough to convince us of its accuracy. Graphic credit: Par.cle Data Group The Standard Model of cosmology We can see photons emi7ed back to here Density ripples start to grow about here BIG BANG!!! A remark on the method of modern physics Millions of data points in ….. A few model parameters out! In cosmology/par.cle physics we do not directly measure the “hidden variables” of interest. Given an underlying, simple, model for how they affect the noisy data sets we do measure, we use stas.cal inference to “see through the noise” into the underlying physical parameters. This is a nearly universal method in modern physical science. One of my messages is that biology is now entering this era. Massive resources were deployed to get here The WMAP satellite The LHC accelerator at CeRN The CMS detector at the LHC This consensus picture is the outcome of an enormous effort (intellectual, experimental, sociological, financial) carried out over a period of 50 years. This sustained effort to answer what amounts to a ques.on of “natural philosophy” is remarkable .. and a credit to the human race. Where does theoretical physics go from here? • There are loose ends, but the historic program has succeeded so well that it has put its own con.nuaon into serious ques.on! • On the conceptual side, we seem to be at a turning point: – Once you are down to point par.cle cons.tuents of maer, you can’t really “explain” them in terms of more fundamental en..es: Is the game over? – There could be more massive point cons.tuents that even the LHC can’t see (and neutrino masses and dark maer point that way … obscurely). – Going deeper, in the light of string theory, we can see a natural reduc.onist limit point at the Planck scale .. way beyond direct experimental reach. • On the experimental side, exploring the relevant energy scales is increasingly costly, and surely approaching societal limits – The LHC is speaking; we hope for surprises, but we may “only” get a comple.on of the Standard Model, not a view of deeper physical law. – Looking beyond the Standard Model, or into inflaon, the future experimental projects are in the 1010 euro class … will taxpayers support them? – And, in the long run, theory without experiment is not sustainable. • So, life is going to be hard for fundamental theory from here on … Not impossible, to be sure, but are there other paths to take? The “other agenda” of theoretical physics • Discovering the fundamental laws is the historic core mission of theore.cal physics .. but that’s not all theore.cal physicists do! • In addi.on, we want to explain phenomena that are not directly baked into the fundamental laws … we call them emergent phenomena. – e.g. show that superconduc.vity (a macroscopic quantum effect) follows from the Schrödinger equaon for many electrons moving in a host atomic lace. – Or prove “confinement”, namely that the quarks of QCD can never be seen outside the hadrons (neutrons and protons) of which they are cons.tuents. • Be7er yet, we want to predict unknown emergent phenomena (i.e. derive them from fundamental law) before their experimental discovery: – Our record on this is not good. The quan.zed Hall effect is a striking quantum effect and could have been predicted. But it wasn’t .. a failure of imaginaon? – It doesn’t happen o^en, but it is not impossible: cosmologists did an.cipate Big Bang phenomena like CMB. Topological insulators were also an.cipated. • Good news is that we have (so far) found that our fundamental laws are able to explain new “emergent” phenomena. Usually aer the fact … Life: the “emperor” of all emergent phenomena • There are phenomena of fundamental importance which are certainly described by the already-known fundamental laws … but whose derivaon from those Laws completely escapes us. • The chief of these is Life. There are good reasons why it is .me to bring the domain of living maer into the realm of predic.ve, mathemacal, science: – How “living maer” is governed by physical principles has always been a ques.on for theore.cal physics ... but inadequate data .ed our hands – The ongoing explosion of quan.tave biological data (hi-throughput sequencing, expression profiling, …) has created a totally new context for this issue – On the biology side, it is becoming clear that we need mathemacal frameworks (like we have in physics) to extract meaning from the growing mass of data. • Developing this kind of theory is what theore.cal physicists do .. and it is a major intellectual challenge, on a par with our quest for fundamental laws – A quick tour of the past, present and future of this enterprise will, I hope, give you a more concrete idea of what I am talking about • It used to be said that there is no theory in biology … the day may be coming when there is no biology without theory! The theoretical physics of Life: past Historical instances of using theore.cal principles to illuminate and make predic.ons about a broad class of biological phenomena include: • Schroedinger’s “What is Life?”: genes are carried by a polymer molecule – Basic quantum mechanics and the known rate of induc.on of mutaons by x- rays (Morgan, 1910) led him to the conclusion that genes had to be carried by a molecule.
Recommended publications
  • Glossary - Cellbiology
    1 Glossary - Cellbiology Blotting: (Blot Analysis) Widely used biochemical technique for detecting the presence of specific macromolecules (proteins, mRNAs, or DNA sequences) in a mixture. A sample first is separated on an agarose or polyacrylamide gel usually under denaturing conditions; the separated components are transferred (blotting) to a nitrocellulose sheet, which is exposed to a radiolabeled molecule that specifically binds to the macromolecule of interest, and then subjected to autoradiography. Northern B.: mRNAs are detected with a complementary DNA; Southern B.: DNA restriction fragments are detected with complementary nucleotide sequences; Western B.: Proteins are detected by specific antibodies. Cell: The fundamental unit of living organisms. Cells are bounded by a lipid-containing plasma membrane, containing the central nucleus, and the cytoplasm. Cells are generally capable of independent reproduction. More complex cells like Eukaryotes have various compartments (organelles) where special tasks essential for the survival of the cell take place. Cytoplasm: Viscous contents of a cell that are contained within the plasma membrane but, in eukaryotic cells, outside the nucleus. The part of the cytoplasm not contained in any organelle is called the Cytosol. Cytoskeleton: (Gk. ) Three dimensional network of fibrous elements, allowing precisely regulated movements of cell parts, transport organelles, and help to maintain a cell’s shape. • Actin filament: (Microfilaments) Ubiquitous eukaryotic cytoskeletal proteins (one end is attached to the cell-cortex) of two “twisted“ actin monomers; are important in the structural support and movement of cells. Each actin filament (F-actin) consists of two strands of globular subunits (G-Actin) wrapped around each other to form a polarized unit (high ionic cytoplasm lead to the formation of AF, whereas low ion-concentration disassembles AF).
    [Show full text]
  • Quantum Biology: an Update and Perspective
    quantum reports Review Quantum Biology: An Update and Perspective Youngchan Kim 1,2,3 , Federico Bertagna 1,4, Edeline M. D’Souza 1,2, Derren J. Heyes 5 , Linus O. Johannissen 5 , Eveliny T. Nery 1,2 , Antonio Pantelias 1,2 , Alejandro Sanchez-Pedreño Jimenez 1,2 , Louie Slocombe 1,6 , Michael G. Spencer 1,3 , Jim Al-Khalili 1,6 , Gregory S. Engel 7 , Sam Hay 5 , Suzanne M. Hingley-Wilson 2, Kamalan Jeevaratnam 4, Alex R. Jones 8 , Daniel R. Kattnig 9 , Rebecca Lewis 4 , Marco Sacchi 10 , Nigel S. Scrutton 5 , S. Ravi P. Silva 3 and Johnjoe McFadden 1,2,* 1 Leverhulme Quantum Biology Doctoral Training Centre, University of Surrey, Guildford GU2 7XH, UK; [email protected] (Y.K.); [email protected] (F.B.); e.d’[email protected] (E.M.D.); [email protected] (E.T.N.); [email protected] (A.P.); [email protected] (A.S.-P.J.); [email protected] (L.S.); [email protected] (M.G.S.); [email protected] (J.A.-K.) 2 Department of Microbial and Cellular Sciences, School of Bioscience and Medicine, Faculty of Health and Medical Sciences, University of Surrey, Guildford GU2 7XH, UK; [email protected] 3 Advanced Technology Institute, University of Surrey, Guildford GU2 7XH, UK; [email protected] 4 School of Veterinary Medicine, Faculty of Health and Medical Sciences, University of Surrey, Guildford GU2 7XH, UK; [email protected] (K.J.); [email protected] (R.L.) 5 Manchester Institute of Biotechnology, Department of Chemistry, The University of Manchester,
    [Show full text]
  • Quantum Mechanics and Biology
    QUANTUM MECHANICS AND BIOLOGY H. C. LONGUET-HIGGINS From the University of Cambridge, England I should like to begin by saying that I feel very diffident about speaking on the subject which the organizers of this Conference invited me to discuss with you. What I have to say will inevitably be limited by the extreme superficiality of my acquaintance with modem biochemistry and biophysics. The only apology which I can offer for being here at all is that I feel, in common with most scientists, that it is a good thing for workers in quite different fields to meet occasionally and compare notes so as to discover whether the methods of one discipline can usefully be applied to the problems of another. It will soon become apparent to you that my opinions on the usefulness of quantum mechanics to biologists are decidedly con- servative; but if these opinions are not generally shared, perhaps at least they will provoke discussion. The thesis which I want to develop in the next few minutes will seem to many of you to be rather pedestrian. Briefly I want to suggest that for many years to come the student of living matter will have much more need for an understanding of physical chemistry than for a knowledge of quantum mechanics. However much one may marvel at the variety and versatility of living things, it cannot be denied that all organisms are in one sense physico-chemical machines. Ingenious and baffling as their structure and function may seem to be, it is therefore proper, in attempting to understand them, to compare their component parts with those in- animate systems which the physical chemist now understands more or less thor- oughly.
    [Show full text]
  • Biophysics 1
    Biophysics 1 on interactions between proteins involved in Notch signaling using BIOPHYSICS modern biophysical methods. Thermodynamics of association and allosteric effects are determined by spectroscopic, ultracentrifugation, http://biophysics.jhu.edu/ and calorimetric methods. Atomic structure information is being obtained by NMR spectroscopy. The ultimate goal is to determine the The Department of Biophysics offers programs leading to the B.A., M.A., thermodynamic partition function for a signal transduction system and and Ph.D. degrees. Biophysics is appropriate for students who wish interpret it in terms of atomic structure. to develop and integrate their interests in the physical and biological sciences. NMR Spectroscopy (Dr. Lecomte) Research interests in the Department cover experimental and Many proteins require stable association with an organic compound computational, molecular and cellular structure, function, and biology, for proper functioning. One example of such “cofactor” is the heme membrane biology, and biomolecular energetics. The teaching and group, a versatile iron-containing molecule capable of catalyzing a research activities of the faculty bring its students in contact with broad range of chemical reactions. The reactivity of the heme group biophysical scientists throughout the university. Regardless of their choice is precisely controlled by interactions with contacting amino acids. of research area, students are exposed to a wide range of problems of Structural fluctuations within the protein are also essential to the fine- biological interest. For more information, and for the most up-to-date list tuning of the chemistry. We are studying how the primary structure of of course offerings and requirements, consult the department web page at cytochromes and hemoglobins codes for heme binding and the motions biophysics.jhu.edu (http://biophysics.jhu.edu/).
    [Show full text]
  • Graduate Group in Biochemistry and Molecular Biophysics General Information for Incoming Students
    Graduate Group in Biochemistry and Molecular Biophysics General Information for Incoming Students Student mailboxes are located on the left as you enter the Mail Room (257 Anatomy-Chemistry Building) of the Dept. of Biochemistry and Biophysics. Use the following address to have mail sent to you at this location: Department of Biochemistry and Biophysics, 257 Anatomy-Chemistry Bldg., Perelman School of Medicine at the University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, PA 19104- 6059. The Student Room is located in 250 Anatomy-Chemistry Building. Keys to this room have been placed in your mailbox. The room has two computers (1 MAC, 1 PC) and a printer. Please make sure the door is locked and securely closed when you leave the room. Lockers: Please contact Kelli McKenna if you would like a locker. They are located in the hallway outside of Rm 234 Anatomy- Chemistry. Advising: You will be meeting individually with the Advising Committee to select your fall courses and for guidance on your rotations. Course registration forms should be returned to Kelli McKenna as soon as possible after your meeting. Any changes in your fall schedule should be made within two weeks of the start of the semester and need to be approved by one of the members of the Advising Committee. Lab Rotation Approval forms are to be completed by Friday, September 13, 2021. You can find the forms for course registration and lab rotation on the BMB webpage: www.med.upenn.edu/bmbgrad under the resources page. Seminars which you are expected to attend: · Raiziss Rounds: Thursdays at noon (Austrian Auditorium, Clinical Research Building).
    [Show full text]
  • BS in Biophysics (285720) MAP Sheet Life Sciences, Cell Biology and Physiology for Students Entering the Degree Program During the 2021-2022 Curricular Year
    BS in Biophysics (285720) MAP Sheet Life Sciences, Cell Biology and Physiology For students entering the degree program during the 2021-2022 curricular year. University Core and Graduation Requirements Suggested Sequence of Courses University Core Requirements: FRESHMAN YEAR JUNIOR YEAR Requirements #Classes Hours Classes 1st Semester 5th Semester First-Year Writing or American Heritage 3.0 CELL 360 3.0 Religion Cornerstones CELL 120 (Biological Science) 3.0 CHEM 481 3.0 Teachings and Doctrine of The Book of 1 2.0 REL A 275 CHEM 105 4.0 PHSCS 220 3.0 Mormon MATH 112 (Languages of Learning & Quantitative Reasoning) 4.0 PHSCS 225 2.0 Religion Cornerstone Course 2.0 Religion Elective 2.0 Jesus Christ and the Everlasting Gospel 1 2.0 REL A 250 Total Hours 16.0 Mentored Lab Experience (CELL 495R) 1-2.0 Foundations of the Restoration 1 2.0 REL C 225 2nd Semester Total Hours 14-15.0 The Eternal Family 1 2.0 REL C 200 First-Year Writing or American Heritage 3.0 6th Semester The Individual and Society BIO 250 2.0 CELL 362 3.0 American Heritage 1-2 3-6.0 from approved list CHEM 106 3.0 CELL 363 1.0 CHEM 107 1.0 CHEM 468 3.0 Global and Cultural Awareness 1 3.0 from approved list MATH 113 4.0 Advanced Writing (WRTG 316 recommended) 3.0 Skills Religion Cornerstone Course 2.0 Global & Cultural Awareness Elective 3.0 First Year Writing 1 3.0 from approved list Total Hours 15.0 Religion Elective 2.0 Total Hours 15.0 Advanced Written and Oral Communications 1 3.0 WRTG 316 SOPHOMORE YEAR recommended 3rd Semester SENIOR YEAR MMBIO 240 3.0 7th Semester Quantitative
    [Show full text]
  • An Introductory Treatise on Biophysics - M.I.El Gohary
    FUNDAMENTALS OF BIOCHEMISTRY, CELL BIOLOGY AND BIOPHYSICS – Vol. III - An Introductory Treatise On Biophysics - M.I.El Gohary AN INTRODUCTORY TREATISE ON BIOPHYSICS M.I.El Gohary Faculty of Science, Al Azhar University, Cairo, Egypt Keywords: Biophysics, interdisciplinary, responsiveness, spermatozoon, budding, irritability, adaptation, mitosis, Auxin, regulator, protozoa, macromolecules, monomers, covalent bonds, aggregate, free energy, hydrocarbons, DNA and RNA, unfold, ribonuclease, catalyst, enzyme-substrate, thiamine, ribosomes, solar energy, adenosine triphosphate, transferase, phosphorylation, photosynthesis, chlorophyll, photophase, dark reaction, anaerobic, aerobic, respiratory pathway, diffusion, random motion, frictional force, macromolecules, random walk, average squared displacement, probability, Fick’s diffusion constant, Fick’s law, inhomogeneous equation, osmosis, semipermeable, osmotic pressure, hypertonic, isotonic, turgor pressure, hydrophobic, hydrophilic, lipid, trilaminar, Myelin, phospholipid, Mosaic, transport, simple diffusion, solute, solubility, electric charge, selective permeability, ion channels, electrochemical gradient, compartment, plasma, sodium pump, permeability, field theory, net flux, selectivity, reversal potential, diffraction, crystallography, Bragg equation, markers, structural organization, detector, magnetic moment, resonance, magnetic dipole, gyromagnetic ratio, the chemical shift, resolution, patch-clamp, food chain, producers, consumers, decomposers, heterotrophic, heterotrophs, biosphere,
    [Show full text]
  • Biophysics and Systems Biology of Cellular Responses to Perturbations
    Biophysics and systems biology of cellular responses to perturbations. [email protected] Castellani G.C., Remondini D., Giampieri E., de Oliveira L., Sala C., Menichetti G., Virelli A., Zironi I. Dipartimento di Fisica e Astronomia, Università di Bologna Dipartimento di Fisica Università di Bologna,and INFN Galvani Center for Biophysics, Bioinformatics and Biocomplexity via B.Pichat 6/2 ,Bologna, 40127, Italy IBNS & Physics Department Brown University Providence RI USA Trieste 27-09-2013 Centro Interdipartimentale “L. Galvani” (CIG) Università di Bologna Italy Bologna Center for Biocomplexity 2000: L. Galvani Center for integrated studies of Biophysics Bioinformatics and Biocomplexity ( http://www.centrogalvani.unibo.it ) including Systems Biology, Genomics of Longevity and Laser-Plasma Physics. Bio-immuno-pathological group: expertise in cell culture, sorting and omics measurements: is one of the leading laboratory in Europe and in the World for the study of Aging and senescence in humans, including the centenarians; Biophysics group: decennial activity in the field of complex cellular function modeling and advanced data analysis, and recently is developing biophysical measurements as patch clamp and fluorescence microscopy. An intriguing aspect of Radiation effect is the sharing of mechanisms with cellular senescence, organismic aging and LDR-induced carcinogenesis in humans as: e.g. the Free radical theory (FRT). Harman in the 1950s, . 1) the rate of living theory, which holds that lifespan is an inverse function of metabolic
    [Show full text]
  • Open Position in Biophysics/Chemical Biology
    Open position in Biophysics/Chemical Biology Our laboratory of Biophysical Chemistry of Macromolecules (LCBM) at the EPFL in Lausanne, Switzerland (www.epfl.ch/labs/lcbm/) offers a PhD position in the fields of biophysics / chemical biology. Our main focus is to understand the structure and function of chro‐ matin and its role in transcription regulation using a combination of chemistry and biophysics. Recently, our laboratory observed how pioneer transcription factors (pTFs) can access closed chromatin (Mivelaz et al., Molecular Cell 2020). Based on this study and the methods developed therein, we are now investigating molecular mechanisms of chromatin remodeling controlled by pTFs and chromatin remodel‐ ers, using genetics, chemical biology, and single‐molecule biophysics. Within this project, we offer PhD positions, as well as postdoc positions. Your profile (for the PhD position): – A master or equivalent degree in biochemistry, bio‐ physics or chemical biology – Experience in working in a biochemistry or biophysics (imaging) laboratory. – Good knowledge in written and oral English. – Highly motivated for discovering new molecular mechanisms in a challenging environment. – Interest for interdisciplinary projects. – A passion for biophysical chemistry and genetic regulation at the highest level. Application/selection procedure: 1. Send a Letter of motivation, a CV, a summary of previously done research and the contact information of 3 referees to [email protected]. Ideally, we receive your ap‐ plication until March 15, 2021. 2. Selected candidates will be invited for a virtual interview, and, in a second round a virtual visit (including a seminar and meetings with PhD students and postdocs). 3. If you need further information, visit https://lcbm.epfl.ch/fierz/, or contact [email protected].
    [Show full text]
  • Suggested Guidelines for Starting an Undergraduate Biophysics Program
    Suggested Guidelines for Starting an Undergraduate Biophysics Program A biophysics major explores the bridge between biology and physics, applying quantitative methods to solve problems in biology, medicine, and related fields. A biophysics program is interdisciplinary, drawing from coursework in physics, biology, chemistry, mathematics, and statistics. It combines a broad science curriculum with physical and mathematical rigor in prepa- ration for diverse careers. The need for STEM education is well documented. Studies including the influential 2007 National Academies report “Rising Above the Gathering Storm: Energizing and Employing America for a Brighter Economic Future” have warned of potential weaknesses existing in the U.S. STEM education system, and how addressing it relates to national prosperity and power [1]. In the succeeding decade, positive efforts have been made over the entire educational spectrum. Still, there may be a need for over one million more college graduates in STEM fields above the current trajectory in the coming decade [2]. Documented trends indicate the need for interdisciplinary STEM options in particular. For example, the U.S. Department of Labor, Bureau of Labor Statistics projects, from 2014-2024, an increase in employment among interdisciplinary fields like bio- medical engineering (23%), environmental science (11%), and biochemistry/biophysics (8%), above the projected increase for fields like microbiology (4%), physics (7%), and chemistry (3%) [3]. As an interdisciplinary STEM option, a biophysics program brings together faculty from across disciplines, encouraging inter- actions, and potentially leading research and funding opportunities. Further, an undergraduate biophysics program may have a relatively easy implementation, as much of the core coursework (physics, chemistry, biology, and mathematics) is already offered at most institutions.
    [Show full text]
  • Physiology and Biophysics 1
    Physiology and Biophysics 1 Physiology and Biophysics Michael D. Cahalan, Department Chair Todd C. Holmes, Department Vice Chair Francesco Tombola, Departmental Graduate Advisor Building D, Room D340, Medical Sciences I 949-824-5864 http://www.physiology.uci.edu/ The Department of Physiology and Biophysics offers research opportunities in molecular biophysics of membranes and proteins, ion channels and signal transduction, molecular and cell biology, structural biology, proteomics, physiological genomics, neuroscience, developmental neurobiology, stem cell biology, endocrinology, cardiac and exercise physiology, GI pathophysiology, immunology, cancer biology, and vision science. The Department offers graduate study under the auspices of the School of Medicine and in conjunction with the graduate program in Cellular and Molecular Biosciences (CMB) and the Interdepartmental Neuroscience Program (INP), which are described in the School of Biological Sciences section (http://catalogue.uci.edu/schoolofbiologicalsciences/#graduatetext). Students are eligible to enter the Department program after meeting the specific requirements of the CMB or INP gateway curriculum or by direct application to the Department. The Department program leads to an M.S. or Ph.D. in Biomedical Sciences, awarded after successful completion of all requirements. Students admitted through either gateway program who select a research advisor in the Department begin following the departmental requirements for the Ph.D. at the beginning of their second year. The faculty conducts quarterly reviews of all continuing students to ensure that they maintain satisfactory progress within their particular academic program. Students participate in a literature review course designed to strengthen research techniques and presentation skills, and attend the monthly Department Colloquium. Students advance to candidacy during the third year; each student presents a seminar on their research projects in preparation for their Ph.D.
    [Show full text]
  • CAMPEP Anatomy and Physiology Requirements As Posted in the Appended CAMPEP Credential Requirements As Follows
    WESTERN UNIVERSITY SCHULICH SCHOOL OF MEDICINE & DENTISTRY DEPARTMENT OF MEDICAL BIOPHYSICS BIOPHYS 9706L –CAMPEP PHYSIOLOGY & ANATOMY COURSE OUTLINE: MAY 1- AUGUST 31 2019 DESCRIPTION This course provides a University level background and training in the fundamentals of anatomy and physiology and covers all the major body systems relevant to CAMPEP training requirements for graduate students, including image representation, cadaveric representation and body systems integrating both structure and function. This course concentrates on exposing students to real-world understandings of human physiology and anatomy as it applies to typical diagnostic and therapeutic clinical physics applications. This course was designed to be alligned with and cover all the the CAMPEP requirements for training in human physiology and anatomy for the PhD-MClSc program. CONTACT HOURS: 4 meeting sessions/lectures, self-directed course. PREREQUISITES Undergraduate courses in Engineering and Physics consistent with the CAMPEP program entry requirements. Approved enrollment in CAMPEP PhD-MClSc degree in Medical Biophysics at Western University. Approved enrollment in ARC Bootcamp in fall term following successful completion of this course. ANTIREQUESITES Undergraduate courses in Physiology and Anatomy at Western or any accredited University COURSE CONTENT The following topics will be covered in the following order and timeframe. There will be a meeting session at specific periods and after completion of a body system for the instructor and students to sit face to face together to review previous content and undertake an oral presentation and quiz comprised of a problem or case dedicated to the content. Textbooks: GA = Gray’s Anatomy for Students, 3rd edition; Drake. HP = Human Physiology, an Integrated Approach, 6th edition; Silverthorn.
    [Show full text]