Black Rockfish S. Melanops, While Spatially-Mapped and Observed in Some of the Same Schools and Locations As Blue Rockfish, Were

Total Page:16

File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

Black Rockfish S. Melanops, While Spatially-Mapped and Observed in Some of the Same Schools and Locations As Blue Rockfish, Were Part One: Survey of Punta Gorda Ecological Reserve Black rockfish S. melanops, while spatially-mapped and observed in some of the same schools and locations as blue rockfish, were more widely distrib- uted in areas also occupied by kelp greenling H. decagrammus and canary rockfish S. pinniger (Figure 26a–c). Cluster analyses by habitat and relief suggest that these three species are more closely associated to each other than to blue rockfish S. mystinus (Figures 22, 23, 24, and 25). While they do cluster together, each has a unique habitat preference. All three were found over Rocksand1 and Rocksand3 substrates, however kelp greenling showed a preference for low-relief habitats common to canary rockfish (“boulderlow” and “rocklow”), differing from black rockfish, which shares blue rockfish’s preference for “rockhigh” habitat. Given these differences, spatial distribution patterns reveal that low-relief “generalists” common to areas with both sand and rock, such as kelp greenling, are more pervasive at PGER than canary rockfish, which were found in “rock-sand” interface areas. Our visual observa- tions and orientation analysis, which indicate that canary rockfish are in contact with or near sand substrate adjacent to reefs, validates the results from both cluster analysis and mapped distributions. Macroinvertebrates PGER is dominated by filtering organisms that are able to withstand a high particulate load and a strong, current-dominated environment. Colonial suspension feeders such as cnidarians, sponges, and tunicates were the most numerous organisms on hard substrates. Other organisms observed in moder- ate numbers at PGER include predatory and filter-feeding sea stars and the deposit-feeding sea cucumber. These organisms must respond to a variety of abiotic and biotic environmental influences in order to endure in this harsh environment. Abiotic factors may include water flow (Harris 1991), seston flux (Lesser, et al 1994), and sand inundation (McQuaid and Dower 1990, Antonio 1986). Biotic factors may include predation (Duggins 1983), prey availability (Annett and Pierotti 1984), competition (Chadwick 1991), and community composition (Anthony 1997). Psammophilic macroinvertabrates: Greater than 50% (22/42) of the species observed was found at least once on sand. This indicates that most of the species present at PGER were tolerant of sand (e.g., sessile species—the sponge, P. pachymastia) or would move over sand (e.g., motile species—the sea star, H. leviuscula). However, several sessile species had much higher densities in areas of strong sand movement and could be considered psammophilic. These species include the sponges P. pachymastia and T. aurantia. Cnidarians included the unidentified gorgonian and the urticina, U. piscivora, and chordates such as the tunicates P. planum and S. montereyensis. Sandy sites may serve as refuges that protect these species from potential competitors or predators (Antonio 1986). The sea cucumber P. californicus, and the leather star D. imbricata, were found on sand ranging from 9–28% of Karpov 48 Part One: Survey of Punta Gorda Ecological Reserve the time. Comparatively, the urchin S. franciscanus was never seen on sand (0%) and Stimpson’s sunstar Solaster stimpsonii was only seen twice on sand (2 observations). The few invertebrates that were found out on the sand habitat were in close proximity to areas of rocky reef (Figures 35b, c and 36b). This associa- tion between sand epifauna and reef is likely due to the increased sand stabil- ity created by the rocks’ deflection of ocean currents and waves. In addition, areas of sand which had ripples <10 cm high had higher densities of inverte- brate species than area with sand ripples >10 cm. For example, the sea pen Pstilosarcus gurneyi, which occurred in very low densities, was only found in sand habitat with small ripples and in areas of sand-impacted bedrock that had high sand cover. Large volumes of sand have apparently moved through PGER’s deeper waters, impacting the boundaries of the rocky reef. Only high-relief rock outcroppings and boulders remained exposed and unworn. Within areas of higher-relief rock, fine sand and detritus filled the cracks, crevices, and depres- sions. Low-relief rock < 1m high dominates most of the central reef at PGER. The outer boundaries of this reef area were often covered by sand; only the tops of the rocks and boulders lacked some degree of coverage. Organisms living on these rock tops were inundated by sand. Examples of commonly- identified organisms in this habitat were the sponge P. pachymastia and the unidentified gorgonian. Moderate-relief rock from 1 to 3 m high was some- what to very sparsely covered by sand and represented the second most abundant deep-water habitat type within the reserve. Commonly identified species found in this habitat included the following: sponges A. erathacus, C. arb, Halichondria sp., and T. aurantia; the hydroids Aglaophenia sp., G. annulata, and Plumularia sp.; the anthozoans C. californica, E. scotinus, and U. piscivora; the scallop C. giganteum; the barnacle B. nubilus; the asteroids D. imbricata, H. leviuscula, Mediaster aequalis, P. brevispinus, and Pycnopodia helianthoides; and the tunicates Aplidium sp., Cystodytes lobatus, and P. planum. High-relief rock represented the smallest proportion of deep-water habitat within PGER, but it contained some of the most diverse invertebrate assem- blages. These habitats were most common within the boundaries of the rocky reef, and consisted of rocky outcroppings that were greater than 3 m high. Commonly-identified species included the above mentioned species found in the exposed low-relief Bedrock and Boulder habitat with the following addi- tions: the hydrocorals S. californicus and Stylantheca porphyra; the anemone M. giganteum; the sea cucumber, P. californicus; and the sea stars S. stimpsonii and O. koehleri. Karpov 49 Part One: Survey of Punta Gorda Ecological Reserve Comparison Few published studies pertain to the subtidal ecology of Northern California. of PGER with Those that do are in areas far to the north and south of PGER. To the north, Previously the only published reports are Areas of Special Biological Significance (ASBS) Examined reports on the Kelp Beds at Trinidad Bay ASBS (Anonymous 1979c) and Areas of Redwood National Park ASBS (Anonymous 1981b). To the south, published ASBS descriptions of the Pygmy Forest Ecological Staircase ASBS (Anony- Special mous 1981a), the Kelp Beds at Saunders Reef ASBS (Anonymous 1980), Biological Gerstle Cove ASBS (Anonymous 1979a), and Bodega Marine Life Refuge Significance ASBS (Anonymous 1979a) are representative of the few subtidal descriptions (ASBS) in south of Punta Gorda. These ASBS reports are predominantly anecdotal, with Sonoma, varying detail and little temporal information. Waters deeper than 12m were Mendocino, not described in much detail, if at all. The lack of well-described subtidal Humboldt and habitats makes comparisons between ASBS sites difficult and subject to Del Norte interpretation. Therefore, we cannot make comparisons between the deep subtidal areas of PGER and the Areas listed above. The following compari- Counties sons of ASBS reports and PGER focus on descriptions of the habitat types observed and similarities in the biota found in waters shallower than 18 m (Table 25). Differences are examined based on species of management impor- tance. Kelp beds at Trinidad Bay ASBS To the north, Trinidad Head is the only major headland between Cape Mendocino and Point St. George (Figure 1). The sheltering effects of Trinidad Head place Trinidad Bay proper in the lee of northwesterly swell, which continues throughout most of the year. Due to the sheltering effects of the headland, the bay proper is distinctly different from most sites studied in Northern California. Invertebrates found within Trinidad Bay are apparently representative of the types of species found in deeper waters with higher rates of deposition (Table 25). The western section of Trinidad Head is highly exposed to northwesterly swell, as are other Northern California ASBS sites. The subtidal waters are strongly influenced by local rivers to the south, which discharge large amounts of fresh water and eroded materials. Waves from the south, along with local currents, trap much of the depositional material in the bay, reducing the photic zone throughout the area. The photic zone extends to a depth of about 6 m as indicated by algal species such as the bull kelp N. luetkeana, which is common in protected areas on rock tops that ascend into the photic zone. Subtidal biota are highly influenced by wave exposure and sediment deposition. The wave-protected areas of the bay proper are composed of a sand/silt bottom with sheer-faced sea stacks and boulder piles. Wave energy is reduced to a moderate surge that scours the bases of rocky oucroppings. The rocky habitats are highly depositional and contain many invertebrate species not found in the more exposed areas of the bay. Examples of invertebrates include the brachiopod Terebratalia transversa and the tunicate Chelyosoma productum. Karpov 50 Part One: Survey of Punta Gorda Ecological Reserve Wave exposed areas of Trinidad Bay are composed of sand bottom with sheer- faced sea stacks, which rise nearly to or above the surface of the water, and boulder piles near the base of the sea stacks. The sand habitat is reported to be highly turbid with a mixture of infaunal and epifaunal species. Epifaunal species were associated with areas of semi-stable sand and included the olive snail Olivella biplicata, the Dungeness crab Cancer magister, and the sand dollar Dendraster excentricus. The rocky substrate was dominated by filter feeding invertebrates such as the hydroid Aglaophenia sp., the sea strawberry G. rubiformis, the anemone M. senile, the barnacle B. crenatus, and the sea cucum- ber Eupentacta quinquessemita which formed large aggregations on the lee side of sheer-faced rocks. Few urchins or abalone were found in Trinidad Bay. Redwood National Park ASBS Moving farther north, Redwood National Park is located in northern Humboldt county and southern Del Norte county (Figure 1).
Recommended publications
  • COMPLETE LIST of MARINE and SHORELINE SPECIES 2012-2016 BIOBLITZ VASHON ISLAND Marine Algae Sponges
    COMPLETE LIST OF MARINE AND SHORELINE SPECIES 2012-2016 BIOBLITZ VASHON ISLAND List compiled by: Rayna Holtz, Jeff Adams, Maria Metler Marine algae Number Scientific name Common name Notes BB year Location 1 Laminaria saccharina sugar kelp 2013SH 2 Acrosiphonia sp. green rope 2015 M 3 Alga sp. filamentous brown algae unknown unique 2013 SH 4 Callophyllis spp. beautiful leaf seaweeds 2012 NP 5 Ceramium pacificum hairy pottery seaweed 2015 M 6 Chondracanthus exasperatus turkish towel 2012, 2013, 2014 NP, SH, CH 7 Colpomenia bullosa oyster thief 2012 NP 8 Corallinales unknown sp. crustous coralline 2012 NP 9 Costaria costata seersucker 2012, 2014, 2015 NP, CH, M 10 Cyanoebacteria sp. black slime blue-green algae 2015M 11 Desmarestia ligulata broad acid weed 2012 NP 12 Desmarestia ligulata flattened acid kelp 2015 M 13 Desmerestia aculeata (viridis) witch's hair 2012, 2015, 2016 NP, M, J 14 Endoclaydia muricata algae 2016 J 15 Enteromorpha intestinalis gutweed 2016 J 16 Fucus distichus rockweed 2014, 2016 CH, J 17 Fucus gardneri rockweed 2012, 2015 NP, M 18 Gracilaria/Gracilariopsis red spaghetti 2012, 2014, 2015 NP, CH, M 19 Hildenbrandia sp. rusty rock red algae 2013, 2015 SH, M 20 Laminaria saccharina sugar wrack kelp 2012, 2015 NP, M 21 Laminaria stechelli sugar wrack kelp 2012 NP 22 Mastocarpus papillatus Turkish washcloth 2012, 2013, 2014, 2015 NP, SH, CH, M 23 Mazzaella splendens iridescent seaweed 2012, 2014 NP, CH 24 Nereocystis luetkeana bull kelp 2012, 2014 NP, CH 25 Polysiphonous spp. filamentous red 2015 M 26 Porphyra sp. nori (laver) 2012, 2013, 2015 NP, SH, M 27 Prionitis lyallii broad iodine seaweed 2015 M 28 Saccharina latissima sugar kelp 2012, 2014 NP, CH 29 Sarcodiotheca gaudichaudii sea noodles 2012, 2014, 2015, 2016 NP, CH, M, J 30 Sargassum muticum sargassum 2012, 2014, 2015 NP, CH, M 31 Sparlingia pertusa red eyelet silk 2013SH 32 Ulva intestinalis sea lettuce 2014, 2015, 2016 CH, M, J 33 Ulva lactuca sea lettuce 2012-2016 ALL 34 Ulva linza flat tube sea lettuce 2015 M 35 Ulva sp.
    [Show full text]
  • The Biology of Seashores - Image Bank Guide All Images and Text ©2006 Biomedia ASSOCIATES
    The Biology of Seashores - Image Bank Guide All Images And Text ©2006 BioMEDIA ASSOCIATES Shore Types Low tide, sandy beach, clam diggers. Knowing the Low tide, rocky shore, sandstone shelves ,The time and extent of low tides is important for people amount of beach exposed at low tide depends both on who collect intertidal organisms for food. the level the tide will reach, and on the gradient of the beach. Low tide, Salt Point, CA, mixed sandstone and hard Low tide, granite boulders, The geology of intertidal rock boulders. A rocky beach at low tide. Rocks in the areas varies widely. Here, vertical faces of exposure background are about 15 ft. (4 meters) high. are mixed with gentle slopes, providing much variation in rocky intertidal habitat. Split frame, showing low tide and high tide from same view, Salt Point, California. Identical views Low tide, muddy bay, Bodega Bay, California. of a rocky intertidal area at a moderate low tide (left) Bays protected from winds, currents, and waves tend and moderate high tide (right). Tidal variation between to be shallow and muddy as sediments from rivers these two times was about 9 feet (2.7 m). accumulate in the basin. The receding tide leaves mudflats. High tide, Salt Point, mixed sandstone and hard rock boulders. Same beach as previous two slides, Low tide, muddy bay. In some bays, low tides expose note the absence of exposed algae on the rocks. vast areas of mudflats. The sea may recede several kilometers from the shoreline of high tide Tides Low tide, sandy beach.
    [Show full text]
  • Review, the (Medical) Benefits and Disadvantage of Sea Cucumber
    IOSR Journal of Pharmacy and Biological Sciences (IOSR-JPBS) e-ISSN:2278-3008, p-ISSN:2319-7676. Volume 12, Issue 5 Ver. III (Sep. – Oct. 2017), PP 30-36 www.iosrjournals.org Review, The (medical) benefits and disadvantage of sea cucumber Leonie Sophia van den Hoek, 1) Emad K. Bayoumi 2). 1 Department of Marine Biology Science, Liberty International University, Wilmington, USA. Professional Member Marine Biological Association, UK. 2 Department of General Surgery, Medical Academy Named after S. I. Georgiesky of Crimea Federal University, Crimea, Russia Corresponding Author: Leonie Sophia van den Hoek Abstract: A remarkable feature of Holothurians is the catch collagen that forms their body wall. Catch collagen has two states, soft and stiff, that are under neurological control [1]. A study [3] provides evidence that the process of new organ formation in holothurians can be described as an intermediate process showing characteristics of both epimorphic and morphallactic phenomena. Tropical sea cucumbers, have a previously unappreciated role in the support of ecosystem resilience in the face of global change, it is an important consideration with respect to the bêche-de-mer trade to ensure sea cucumber populations are sustained in a future ocean [9]. Medical benefits of the sea cucumber are; Losing weight [19], decreasing cholesterol [10], improved calcium solubility under simulated gastrointestinal digestion and also promoted calcium absorption in Caco-2 and HT-29 cells [20], reducing arthritis pain [21], HIV therapy [21], treatment osteoarthritis [21], antifungal steroid glycoside [22], collagen protein [14], alternative to mammalian collagen [14], alternative for blood thinners [29], enhancing immunity and disease resistance [30].
    [Show full text]
  • FAU Institutional Repository
    FAU Institutional Repository http://purl.fcla.edu/fau/fauir This paper was submitted by the faculty of FAU’s Harbor Branch Oceanographic Institute. Notice: ©1989 Elsevier B.V. The final published version of this manuscript is available at http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/journal/00220981 and may be cited as: Cameron, J. L., & Fankboner, P. V. (1989). Reproductive biology of the commercial sea cucumber Parastichopus californicus (Stimpson) (Echinodermata: Holothuroidea). II. Observations on the ecology of development, recruitment and the juvenile life stage. Journal of Experimental Marine Biology and Ecology, 127(1), 43-67.doi:10.1016/0022-0981(89)90208-6 I i'V ) J. Exp. Mar. BioI. £Col., 1989, Vol. 127, pp. 43-67 43 Elsevier JEM 01229 Reproductive biology of the commercial sea cucumber Parastichopus californicus (Stimpson) (Echinodermata: Holothuroidea). II. Observations on the ecology of development, recruitment, and the juvenile life stage J. Lane Cameron and Peter V. Fankboner Department ofBiological Sciences. Simon Fraser University. Burnaby, British Columbia, Canada (Received 17 November 1987; revision received 9 January 1989; accepted 23 January 1989) Abstract: Evidence from in vitro culture of embryos and larvae of Parastichopus califomicus (Stimpson) suggests that asynchronization of development through metamorphosis and settlement results in a variable pelagic period for larvae within a particular cohort. Additionally, considerable variation in size of 0 + yr recruits observed in situ may indicate that settlement had occurred continuously for some months within the population studied. Recruitment of at least seven species of echinoderms (including P. californicus} was observed at distinct sites that were notably free of the predatory sea stars Solaster dawsoni (Verrill), S.
    [Show full text]
  • Intertidal Organisms of Point Reyes National Seashore
    Intertidal Organisms of Point Reyes National Seashore PORIFERA: sea sponges. CRUSTACEANS: barnacles, shrimp, crabs, and allies. CNIDERIANS: sea anemones and allies. MOLLUSKS : abalones, limpets, snails, BRYOZOANS: moss animals. clams, nudibranchs, chitons, and octopi. ECHINODERMS: sea stars, sea cucumbers, MARINE WORMS: flatworms, ribbon brittle stars, sea urchins. worms, peanut worms, segmented worms. UROCHORDATES: tunicates. Genus/Species Common Name Porifera Prosuberites spp. Cork sponge Leucosolenia eleanor Calcareous sponge Leucilla nuttingi Little white sponge Aplysilla glacialis Karatose sponge Lissodendoryx spp. Skunk sponge Ophlitaspongia pennata Red star sponge Haliclona spp. Purple haliclona Leuconia heathi Sharp-spined leuconia Cliona celata Yellow-boring sponge Plocarnia karykina Red encrusting sponge Hymeniacidon spp. Yellow nipple sponge Polymastia pachymastia Polymastia Cniderians Tubularia marina Tubularia hydroid Garveia annulata Orange-colored hydroid Ovelia spp. Obelia Sertularia spp. Sertularia Abientinaria greenii Green's bushy hydroid Aglaophenia struthionides Giant ostrich-plume hydroid Aglaophenia latirostris Dainty ostrich-plume hydroid Plumularia spp. Plumularia Pleurobrachia bachei Cat's eye Polyorchis spp. Bell-shaped jellyfish Chrysaora melanaster Striped jellyfish Velella velella By-the-wind-sailor Aurelia auria Moon jelly Epiactus prolifera Proliferating anemone Anthopleura xanthogrammica Giant green anemone Anthopleura artemissia Aggregated anemone Anthopleura elegantissima Burrowing anemone Tealia lofotensis
    [Show full text]
  • Echinodermata
    Echinodermata Bruce A. Miller The phylum Echinodermata is a morphologically, ecologically, and taxonomically diverse group. Within the nearshore waters of the Pacific Northwest, representatives from all five major classes are found-the Asteroidea (sea stars), Echinoidea (sea urchins, sand dollars), Holothuroidea (sea cucumbers), Ophiuroidea (brittle stars, basket stars), and Crinoidea (feather stars). Habitats of most groups range from intertidal to beyond the continental shelf; this discussion is limited to species found no deeper than the shelf break, generally less than 200 m depth and within 100 km of the coast. Reproduction and Development With some exceptions, sexes are separate in the Echinodermata and fertilization occurs externally. Intraovarian brooders such as Leptosynapta must fertilize internally. For most species reproduction occurs by free spawning; that is, males and females release gametes more or less simultaneously, and fertilization occurs in the water column. Some species employ a brooding strategy and do not have pelagic larvae. Species that brood are included in the list of species found in the coastal waters of the Pacific Northwest (Table 1) but are not included in the larval keys presented here. The larvae of echinoderms are morphologically and functionally diverse and have been the subject of numerous investigations on larval evolution (e.g., Emlet et al., 1987; Strathmann et al., 1992; Hart, 1995; McEdward and Jamies, 1996)and functional morphology (e.g., Strathmann, 1971,1974, 1975; McEdward, 1984,1986a,b; Hart and Strathmann, 1994). Larvae are generally divided into two forms defined by the source of nutrition during the larval stage. Planktotrophic larvae derive their energetic requirements from capture of particles, primarily algal cells, and in at least some forms by absorption of dissolved organic molecules.
    [Show full text]
  • Testing Evolutionary Developmental Hypotheses with Sea Urchins: a Study on Plasticity and Homology
    SEA URCHIN HYPOTHESES: A STUDY OF PLASTICITY AND HOMOLOGY TESTING EVOLUTIONARY DEVELOPMENTAL HYPOTHESES WITH SEA URCHINS: A STUDY OF PLASTICITY AND HOMOLOGY By LISA MARIE PINTO, H.B.Sc. A Thesis Submitted to the School of Graduate Studies in Partial Fulfillment ofthe Requirements for the Degree Master ofScience McMaster University © Copyright by Lisa Marie Pinto, August 2009. MASTEROF SCIENCE (2009) MCMASTER UNIVERSITY (Biology) Hamilton, Ontario TITLE: Testing Evolutionary Developmental Hypotheses with Sea Urchins: A Study on Plasticity and Homology AUTHOR: Lisa Marie Pinto, H.B.Sc. (McMaster, University) SUPERVISOR: Assistant Professor, lR. Stone NUMBER OF PAGES: viii, 62 11 Abstract Sea urchins traditionally have been considered as model organisms for developmental studies, as they transform from bilaterally symmetric larvae to pentaradially symmetric adults. They are classified universally as members in the phylum Echinodermata, but skeletal homologies between the class in which sea urchins are contained and other echinoderm classes remain contested. And, culturally, the high demand for sea urchin sushi, a delicacy known as uni, has spiked interest in sea urchin farming and how to capitalize on making a commercially more-desirable food product for human consumption. In this thesis, experiments were conducted to test evolutionary developmental hypotheses about sea urchin life history plasticity, skeleton homologies, and reproductive energetics. I found that sea urchin rudiments can be resorbed, exhibiting extreme plasticity and, thereby, functioning as capacitors for ensuring metamorphose in favourable conditions; sea urchin primary podia may be considered as nonhomologous with sea cucumber ambulacral podia, in accordance with the extra-axial theory; and gravid sea urchins fed a carrot-only diet produced gonads that were more desirable commercially than were gonads produced by sea urchins fed a seaweed and carrot diet.
    [Show full text]
  • Glossary for the Echinodermata
    February 2011 Christina Ball ©RBCM Phil Lambert GLOSSARY FOR THE ECHINODERMATA OVERVIEW The echinoderms are a globally distributed and morphologically diverse group of invertebrates whose history dates back 500 million years (Lambert 1997; Lambert 2000; Lambert and Austin 2007; Pearse et al. 2007). The group includes the sea stars (Asteroidea), sea cucumbers (Holothuroidea), sea lilies and feather stars (Crinoidea), the sea urchins, heart urchins and sand dollars (Echinoidea) and the brittle stars (Ophiuroidea). In some areas the group comprises up to 95% of the megafaunal biomass (Miller and Pawson 1990). Today some 13,000 species occur around the world (Pearse et al. 2007). Of those 13,000 species 194 are known to occur in British Columbia (Lambert and Boutillier, in press). The echinoderms are a group of almost exclusively marine organisms with the few exceptions living in brackish water (Brusca and Brusca 1990). Almost all of the echinoderms are benthic, meaning that they live on or in the substrate. There are a few exceptions to this rule. For example several holothuroids (sea cucumbers) are capable of swimming, sometimes hundreds of meters above the sea floor (Miller and Pawson 1990). One species of holothuroid, Rynkatorpa pawsoni, lives as a commensal with a deep-sea angler fish (Gigantactis macronema) (Martin 1969). While the echinoderms are a diverse group, they do share four unique features that define the group. These are pentaradial symmetry, an endoskeleton made up of ossicles, a water vascular system and mutable collagenous tissue. While larval echinoderms are bilaterally symmetrical the adults are pentaradially symmetrical (Brusca and Brusca 1990). All echinoderms have an endoskeleton made of calcareous ossicles (figure 1).
    [Show full text]
  • Regeneration of the Digestive Tract of an Anterior-Eviscerating Sea
    Okada and Kondo Zoological Letters (2019) 5:21 https://doi.org/10.1186/s40851-019-0133-3 RESEARCH ARTICLE Open Access Regeneration of the digestive tract of an anterior-eviscerating sea cucumber, Eupentacta quinquesemita, and the involvement of mesenchymal–epithelial transition in digestive tube formation Akari Okada1 and Mariko Kondo1,2,3* Abstract Sea cucumbers (a class of echinoderms) exhibit a high capacity for regeneration, such that, following ejection of inner organs in a process called evisceration, the lost organs regenerate. There are two ways by which evisceration occurs in sea cucmber species: from the mouth (anterior) or the anus (posterior). Intriguingly, regenerating tissues are formed at both the anterior and posterior regions and extend toward the opposite ends, and merge to form a complete digestive tract. From the posterior side, the digestive tube regenerates extending a continuous tube from the cloaca, which remains at evisceration. In posteriorly-eviscerating species, the esophagus remains in the body, and a new tube regenerates continuously from it. However, in anterior-eviscerating species, no tubular tissue remains in the anterior region, raising the question of how the new digestive tube forms in the anterior regenerate. We addressed this question by detailed histological observations of the regenerating anterior digestive tract in a small sea cucumber, Eupentacta quinquesemita (“ishiko” in Japanese) after induced-evisceration. We found that an initial rudiment consisting of mesenchymal cells is formed along the edge of the anterior mesentery from the anterior end, and then, among the mesenchymal cells, multiple clusters of epithelial-like cells appears simultaneously and repeatedly in the extending region by mesenchymal–epithelial transition (MET) as visulalized using toluidine blue staining.
    [Show full text]
  • Induction of Evisceration in the Holothurian Eupentacta Quinquesemita and Evidence for the Existence of an Endogenous Evisceration Factor
    J. exp. Biol. 120, 25-39 (1986) 25 Printed in Great Britain © The Company of Biologists Limited 1986 INDUCTION OF EVISCERATION IN THE HOLOTHURIAN EUPENTACTA QUINQUESEMITA AND EVIDENCE FOR THE EXISTENCE OF AN ENDOGENOUS EVISCERATION FACTOR BY MARIA BYRNE* Department of Biology, University of Victoria, Victoria, B.C. Canada V8W2Y2 Accepted 12 August 1985 SUMMARY The stimuli provoking evisceration of Eupentacta quinquesemita (Selenka) and autotomy of isolated pharyngeal retractor muscle (PRM) tendons were investigated. Tendon autotomy is a two-part response involving PRM contraction and breakdown of tendon connective tissue. An evisceration factor (EF) was detected in coelomic fluid expelled during evisceration. EF was isolated in tissue extracts and the haemal system and peritoneum were sources of EF activity. Autotomy and evisceration were induced by electrical stimulation, K+ and EF, and the effect of these agents was inhibited by anaesthetics. The acetylcholine antagonist tubocurarine chloride elicited evisceration, suggesting that evisceration may involve inhibition of chol- inergic transmission. Evisceration and autotomy appear to be neurally controlled and the presence of an endogenous EF suggests neurosecretory or hormonal activity. Cells involved in evisceration may be located at a distance from the autotomy tissues and effect connective tissue breakdown through the medium of the coelomic fluid. Hypothetical sequences of events and possible roles for EF are presented. INTRODUCTION Evisceration is a behaviour characteristic of many holothurian echinoderms and results in autotomy of the internal organs (Emson & Wilkie, 1980). There are numerous behavioural studies of evisceration where the response was elicited by injection of chemicals into the coelom or by electrical stimulation (Pearse, 1909; Bertolini, 1932; Domantay, 1931; Kille, 1935; Dawbin, 1949; Bai, 1971; Jespersen & Lutzen, 1971; Tracey, 1972; Smith & Greenberg, 1973; Byrne, 1985a).
    [Show full text]
  • The Life History of the Gastropod Thyonicola Americana Tikasingh, Endoparasitic in a Seasonally Eviscerating Holothurian Host
    #^/36 OPHELIA, 24(2): 91-101 (October 1985) THE LIFE HISTORY OF THE GASTROPOD THYONICOLA AMERICANA TIKASINGH, ENDOPARASITIC IN A SEASONALLY EVISCERATING HOLOTHURIAN HOST Maria Byrne Department of Biology, University of Victoria, Victoria, B.C. Canada V8W 2Y2 Present address: Harbor Branch Foundation, Route 1, Box 196, Fort Pierce, Florida 33450, USA ABSTRACT The endoparasitic gastropod Thyonicola americana Tikasingh attaches to the intestine of the dendro- chirote holothurian Eupentacta quinquesemita (Selenka). Evisceration by E. quinquesemita is a seasonal event occurring in the autumn and as a result of their attachment to the viscera, T. americana is annually expelled from its host. The effect of evisceration on the life cycle of T. americana was investigated. Reproduction of the parasite is continuous, but the number of specimens at an advanced reproductive state was highest in summer and decreased coincident with seasonal evisceration. The parasites were not found attached to regenerating or newly regenerated viscera and there seemed to be a 'seasonally' in maturation imposed on T. americana by host seasonal evisceration. The optimum period for infection by T. americana is in the spring and the minimum length of the parasite's life cycle is approximately six months. Parasites expelled during evisceration perish, and so the majority of T. americana do not complete their life cycle. This may be compensated by the high fecundity of successful parasites and their success appears to be amplified by the high density of hosts for infection. The life cycle of T. americana is compared with that of entoconchid species parasitic in aspidochirote holo- thurians. INTRODUCTION During a study of evisceration in the dendrochirote holothurian Eupentacta quin- quesemita (Selenka), an endoparasitic gastropod Thyonicola americana Tikasingh was found attached to the viscera expelled from many of the holothurians.
    [Show full text]
  • Puget Sound Intertidal Biotic Community Monitoring 2011
    S E C R U O S E R L A Puget Sound Intertidal Biotic R Community Monitoring U T 2011 Monitoring Report A N May 2012 Puget Sound Intertidal Biotic Community Monitoring 2011 Monitoring Report May 2012 By Megan N. Dethier University of Washington Helen D. Berry Nearshore Habitat Program Aquatic Resources Division Washington Department of Natural Resources Acknowledgements The Nearshore Habitat Program is part of the Washington State Department of Natural Resources’ (DNR) Aquatic Resources Division, the steward for state-owned aquatic lands. Program funding is provided through the Aquatic Lands Enhancement Act. The Nearshore Habitat Program monitors and evaluates the status and trends of intertidal biotic communities as part of DNR’s environmental stewardship activities, and to conserve and restore Puget Sound through the Puget Sound Partnership. The authors would like to thank • Mary Krauszer (University of Puget Sound) for help in the field, office, and lab; • DNR staff Betty Bookheim, Cinde Donoghue, Joy Polston-Barnes, Brad Pruitt, Jeff Gaeckle and Lisa Ferrier, for assistance in selecting sites and collecting data. Copies of this report may be obtained from the Nearshore Habitat Program – To get more information on the program and download reports and data, enter the search term ‘nearshore habitat program’ on DNR home page: http://www.dnr.wa.gov Contents EXECUTIVE SUMMARY ..................................................................................... i 1 Introduction ...........................................................................................
    [Show full text]