DOCSLIB.ORG

Amended in November 2013 1 REQUEST for PROJECT

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Amended in November 2013 1 REQUEST for PROJECT Amended in November 2013 REQUEST FOR PROJECT/PROGRAMME FUNDING FROM THE ADAPTATION FUND The Appendix form should be completed and transmitted to the Adaptation Fund Board Secretariat by email or fax. Please type in the responses using the template provided. The instructions attached to the form provide guidance to filling out the template. Please note that a project/programme must be fully prepared (i.e., fully appraised for feasibility) when the request is submitted. The final project/programme document resulting from the appraisal process should be attached to this request for funding. Complete documentation should be sent to: The Adaptation Fund Board Secretariat 1818 H Street NW MSN P4-400 Washington, D.C., 20433 U.S.A Fax: +1 (202) 522-3240/5 Email: [email protected] 1 Amended in November 2013 Contents PART I: PROJECT/PROGRAMME INFORMATION....................................................... 4 1. National and Local Level Context .................................................................................................... 4 1.1. Geography and Climate ................................................................................................................ 4 1.2. Political and Legislative ................................................................................................................ 6 1.3. Institutional Arrangements for Climate Change ......................................................................... 8 1.4. Demography ................................................................................................................................. 9 1.5. Economy ..................................................................................................................................... 10 1.6. Education .................................................................................................................................... 11 1.7. The Water Security Problems in Outer Islands ......................................................................... 11 1.8 Proposed Focus Area ........................................................................................................................ 13 1.9 Yap State ........................................................................................................................................... 13 1.10 Chuuk State .................................................................................................................................... 13 1.11 Pohnpei State ................................................................................................................................. 14 1.12 Kosrae State .................................................................................................................................... 14 2. Climate change impacts and risks .............................................................................................. 20 2.1 Sea Level and Extreme High Tides ............................................................................................. 21 2.2 Rainfall ........................................................................................................................................ 23 3. Vulnerability Assessment ............................................................................................................... 23 3.1 National level response to vulnerability ................................................................................... 26 4. Water and Sanitation ..................................................................................................................... 27 4.1 The Significance of Local Decision-Making to Water Security Adaptation in FSM .................. 28 5. Discussions with Communities ...................................................................................................... 28 6. Existing resilient practices in water security ................................................................................. 29 7. Existing resilient practices in coastal management ...................................................................... 31 8. Project / Programme Objectives: ............................................................................................... 32 Project / Programme Components and Financing: ........................................................................... 34 Projected Calendar: ............................................................................................................................ 36 PART II: PROJECT /PROGRAMME JUSTIFICATION ................................................. 37 A Project Activities of the Project ....................................................................................................... 37 2 Amended in November 2013 Component 1. Strengthening policy and institutional capacity for integrated coastal and water management at national and state levels ......................................................................................... 37 Component 2. Demonstration of water security measures in outer islands of Yap, Chuuk and Pohnpei ............................................................................................................................................... 43 Component 3. Demonstration of Kosrae Inland Road Relocation Initiative ................................ 56 Component 4 Knowledge management for improved water and coastal protection ................... 69 B Benefits ............................................................................................................................................ 73 C Cost-effectiveness ........................................................................................................................... 84 D Consistency with Development Strategies .................................................................................... 99 E Consistency with Technical Standards .......................................................................................... 101 F Duplication of project .................................................................................................................... 105 G Learning & KM............................................................................................................................... 112 H. Consultation Process ................................................................................................................... 114 I Justification for funding .................................................................................................................. 123 J: Sustainability ................................................................................................................................. 128 K Environment and Social Impacts and Risks .................................................................................... 134 PART III: IMPLEMENTATION ARRANGEMENTS .................................................... 139 A Institutional arrangements ........................................................................................................... 139 B Risk Management ......................................................................................................................... 146 C Environmental and Social Risk ...................................................................................................... 150 D Monitoring & Evaluation .............................................................................................................. 152 E. Results Framework ....................................................................................................................... 157 F. Alignment with AF RF ................................................................................................................... 170 G. Detailed Budget ........................................................................................................................... 174 PART IV: ENDORSEMENT BY GOVERNMENT AND CERTIFICATION BY THE IMPLEMENTING ENTITY ........................................................................................... 187 ACRONYMS ............................................................................................................... 188 ANNEXES .................................................................................................................. 191 Additional documents attached, for the information of the Adaptation Fund ...... 192 Bibliography of documents referred to in the project document .......................... 193 Relevant websites: .................................................................................................... 196 3 PROJECT/PROGRAMME PROPOSAL TO THE ADAPTATION FUND PART I: PROJECT/PROGRAMME INFORMATION Project/Programme Category: Regular Project Country/ies: Federated States of Micronesia (FSM) Title of Project/Programme: ENHANCING THE CLIMATE CHANGE RESILIENCE OF VULNERABLE ISLAND COMMUNITIES IN FEDERATED STATES OF MICRONESIA Type of Implementing Entity: RIE Implementing Entity: SECRETARIAT OF THE PACIFIC REGIONAL ENVIRONMENT PROGRAM (SPREP) Executing Entity/ies: Office of Environment and Emergency Management (OEEM) on behalf of Kosrae State Government, Pohnpei State Government, Yap State Government, Chuuk State Government Amount of Financing Requested: $9,000,000 (in U.S Dollars Equivalent) Project / Programme Background and Context: Provide brief information on the problem the proposed project/programme is aiming to solve. Outline
Load more

Recommended publications
  • IOM Micronesia
    IOM Micronesia Federated States of Micronesia Republic of the Marshall Islands Republic of Palau Newsletter, July 2018 - April 2019 IOM staff Nathan Glancy inspects a damaged house in Chuuk during the JDA. Credit: USAID, 2019 Typhoon Wutip Destruction Typhoon Wutip passed over Pohnpei, Chuuk, and Yap States, FSM between 19 and 22 February with winds of 75–80 mph and gusts of up to 100 mph. Wutip hit the outer islands of Chuuk State, including the ‘Northwest’ islands (Houk, Poluwat, Polap, Tamatam and Onoun) and the ‘Lower and ‘Middle’ Mortlocks islands, as well as the outer islands of Yap (Elato, Fechailap, Lamotrek, Piig and Satawal) before continuing southwest of Guam and slowly dissipating by the end of February. FSM President, H.E. Peter M. Christian issued a Declaration of Disaster on March 11 and requested international assistance to respond to the damage caused by the typhoon. Consistent with the USAID/FEMA Operational Blueprint for Disaster Relief and Reconstruction in the Federated States of Micronesia (FSM) and the Republic of the Marshall Islands (RMI), a Joint Damage Assessment (JDA) was carried out by representatives of USAID, OFDA, FEMA and the Government of FSM from 18 March to 4 April, with assistance from IOM. The JDA assessed whether Wutip damage qualifies for a US Presidential Disaster Declaration. The JDA found Wutip had caused damage to the infrastructure and agricultural production of 30 islands, The path of Typhoon Wutip Feb 19-22, 2019. Credit: US JDA, 2019. leaving 11,575 persons food insecure. Response to Typhoon Wutip IOM, with the support of USAID/OFDA, has responded with continued distributions of relief items stored in IOM warehouses such as tarps, rope and reverse osmosis (RO) units to affected communities on the outer islands of Chuuk, Yap and Pohnpei states.
    [Show full text]
  • A Companion to Contemporary Documentary Filn1
    A Companion to Contemporary Documentary Filn1 Edited by Alexandra Juhasz and Alisa Lebow WI LEY Blackwell 2 o ,�- This edition first published 2015 © 2015 John Wiley & Sons, Inc, excepting Chapter 1 © 2014 by the Regents of the University of Minnesota and Chapter 19 © 2007 Wayne State University Press Registered Office John Wiley & Sons, Ltd, The Atrium, Southern Gate, Chichester, West Sussex, PO19 8SQ, UK Contents Editorial Offices 350 Main Street, Malden, MA 02148-5020, USA 9600 Garsington Road, Oxford, OX4 2DQ, UK The Atrium, Southern Gate, Chichester, West Sussex, PO19 8SQ, UK For details of our global editorial offices,for customer services, and for informationabout how to apply for permission to reuse the copyright material in this book please see our website at www.wiley.com/wiley-blackwell. The right of Alexandra Juhasz and Alisa Lebow to be identifiedas the authors of the editorial material in this work has been asserted in accordance with the UK Copyright, Designs and Patents Act 1988. All rights reserved. No part of this publication may be reproduced, stored in a retrieval system, or transmitted, in any form or by any means, electronic, mechanical, photocopying, recording or otherwise, except as permitted by the UK Copyright, Designs and Patents Act 1988, without the prior permission of the publisher. Wiley also publishes its books in a variety of electronic formats. Some content that appears in print Notes on Contributors ix may not be available in electronic books. Introduction: A World Encountered 1 Designations used by companies to distinguish their products are often claimed as trademarks. All Alexandra Juhasz and Alisa Lebow brand names and product names used in this book are trade names, service marks, trademarks or registered trademarks of their respective owners.
    [Show full text]
  • Field Instructions for The
    FIELD INSTRUCTIONS FOR THE INVENTORY OF THE PACIFIC ISLANDS 2013 Hawaii Edition Forest Inventory and Analysis Program Pacific Northwest Research Station USDA Forest Service THIS MANUAL IS BASED ON: FOREST INVENTORY AND ANALYSIS NATIONAL CORE FIELD GUIDE FIELD DATA COLLECTION PROCEDURES FOR PHASE 2 PLOTS VERSION 5.1 TABLE OF CONTENTS 1 INTRODUCTION ........................................................................................................................................................................ 1 1.1 PURPOSES OF THIS MANUAL ................................................................................................................................................... 1 1.2 ORGANIZATION OF THIS MANUAL .......................................................................................................................................... 1 1.2.1 UNITS OF MEASURE ................................................................................................................................................................. 2 1.2.2 GENERAL DESCRIPTION ............................................................................................................................................................ 2 1.2.3 PLOT SETUP .............................................................................................................................................................................. 3 1.2.4 PLOT INTEGRITY ......................................................................................................................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • Ascertain Which Aspects of the Aboriginal Belief Structure, As 2) An
    DOCUMENT RESUME ED 066 365 SO 002 935 AUTHOR Mitchell, Roger E. TITLE Oral Traditions of Micronesians as an Index to Culture Change Reflected in Micronesian College Graduates. Final Report. INSTITUTION Wisconsin State Univ.,Eau Claire. SPONS AGENCY Office of Education (DHEW), Washington, D.C. Bureau of Research. BUREAU NO BR-O-E-162 PUB DATE 1 Mar 72 GRANT OEG-5-71-0007-509 NOTE 27p. EDRS PRICE MF-$0 .65 BC-$3. 29 DESCRIPTORS *Acculturation; Biculturalism; *College Students; Cultural Background; Cultural Differences; *Cultural Factors; *Folk Culture; Interviews; *Oral Communication; Values IDENTIFIERS *Micronesians ABSTRACT The study on which this final report is based focused on selected Micronesian students at the University of Guam who, after receiving their degrees, will return to their home islands to assume positions requiring them to function as intermediaries between the American and Micronesian approaches of life. Interviews with these students and with less-educated fellow islanders were taped to: 1) ascertain which aspects of the aboriginal belief structure, as preserved in oral tradition, have been most resistant to change; and, 2) an attempt to establish if the students are fairly representative of their traditional belief and value system despite their American-sponsored educations. Some of the findings were: that student belief in, and knowledge of the old mythological and cosmological constructs was generally low; that belief was high in magic, native medicine, and spirits; and that young and old alike were receptive to attempts at cultural preservations. The report contains a summary of the study, a discussion of study background, a description of methods used in collection of the folktales, analyses of the oral traditions, 16 references, and a bibliography containing over 100 entries.
    [Show full text]
  • Renewable Energy Development Project
    Project Number: 49450-023 November 2019 Pacific Renewable Energy Investment Facility Federated States of Micronesia: Renewable Energy Development Project This document is being disclosed to the public in accordance with ADB’s Access to Information Policy. CURRENCY EQUIVALENTS The currency unit of the Federated States of Micronesia is the United States dollar. ABBREVIATIONS ADB – Asian Development Bank BESS – battery energy storage system COFA – Compact of Free Association DOFA – Department of Finance and Administration DORD – Department of Resources and Development EIRR – economic internal rate of return FMR – Financial Management Regulations FSM – Federated States of Micronesia GDP – gross domestic product GHG – greenhouse gas GWh – gigawatt-hour KUA – Kosrae Utilities Authority kW – kilowatt kWh – kilowatt-hour MW – megawatt O&M – operation and maintenance PAM – project administration manual PIC – project implementation consultant PUC – Pohnpei Utilities Corporation TA – technical assistance YSPSC – Yap State Public Service Corporation NOTE In this report, “$” refers to United States dollars unless otherwise stated. Vice-President Ahmed M. Saeed, Operations 2 Director General Ma. Carmela D. Locsin, Pacific Department (PARD) Director Olly Norojono, Energy Division, PARD Team leader J. Michael Trainor, Energy Specialist, PARD Team members Tahmeen Ahmad, Financial Management Specialist, Procurement, Portfolio, and Financial Management Department (PPFD) Taniela Faletau, Safeguards Specialist, PARD Eric Gagnon, Principal Procurement Specialist,
    [Show full text]
  • Kosrae State Business Resource Guide
    Kosrae State Business Regulations and General Business Resources What every business person should know about operating in Kosrae State Kosrae Small Business Development Center PO Box 577 Tofol, Kosrae, FM 96944 Developed August 2004 In partnership with the PISBDCN and the U.S. Small Business Administration The Kosrae Small Business Development Center is part of the University of Guam Pacific Islands Small Business Development Centers Network and is sponsored by the U.S. Small Business Administration under Cooperative Agreement No. 04-603001-Z-0058-10. This cooperative agreement is partially funded by the U.S. Small Business Administration. SBA’s funding is not an endorsement of any products, opinions or services. SBA funded programs are extended to the general public on a non-discriminatory basis. Kosrae State Business Regulations and General Business Resources Introduction This guide has been prepared by the Kosrae Small Business Development Center to assist all businesses – both large and small, locally owned or foreign owned – to understand all applicable “rules and regulations” that they must comply with in order to operate a business in the State of Kosrae. There are three sets of government rules and regulations which apply to all businesses. The Federated States of Micronesia National Government regulates certain areas of business and sets most taxes. The State of Kosrae regulates all businesses operating within the State and collects certain fees and excise charges. In addition, the Local Government Authorities have their own rules and regulations which apply to businesses operating within their boundaries. It is very important that each business meet all applicable requirements of National, State and Local Governments.
    [Show full text]
  • East Micronesia Cable Project
    Appendices Appendix 1 Baseline Data Report EAST MICRONESIA CABLE PROJECT (World Bank Project Number P130592, Asian Development Bank Grant Number D004-FM) BASELINE DATA REPORT Report prepared by Argo Environmental Ltd FINAL December 2016 Baseline Data Report i East Micronesia Cable Project TABLE OF CONTENTS 1. INTRODUCTION 1 1.1 BACKGROUND 1 1.2 PROPOSED CABLE PROJECT 1 2. PHYSICAL ENVIRONMENT 3 2.1 INTRODUCTION 3 2.2 LOCATION & GEOGRAPHY 3 2.3 CLIMATE 4 2.3.1 Kosrae 4 2.3.2 Kiribati 4 2.3.3 Nauru 5 2.4 TOPOGRAPHY, GEOLOGY, SOILS & HYDROLOGY 5 2.4.1 Kosrae 5 2.4.2 Kiribati 5 2.4.3 Nauru 6 2.5 SEISMOLOGY & EARTHQUAKES 6 2.6 OCEANOGRAPHIC CHARACTERISTICS 6 2.7 DEEP OCEAN FEATURES 6 2.7.1 Hydrothermal Vents 7 2.7.2 Seamounts 7 2.8 UNEXPLODED ORDINANCE 8 3. OPEN OCEAN RESOURCES 9 3.1 INTRODUCTION 9 3.2 CETACEANS 9 3.3 MARINE TURTLES 9 4. NEARSHORE COASTAL MARINE RESOURCES 12 4.1 BACKGROUND 12 4.1.1 Kosrae 12 4.1.2 Kiribati 14 4.1.3 Nauru 14 4.2 SITE SPECIFIC INVESTIGATIONS 15 4.2.1 Introduction 15 4.2.2 Kosrae 15 4.2.3 Kiribati 17 4.2.4 Nauru 18 4.3 INTERTIDAL COMMUNITIES 18 4.3.1 Introduction 18 4.3.2 Kosrae 19 4.3.3 Kiribati 23 4.3.4 Nauru 27 4.4 SUBTIDAL COMMUNITIES 29 4.4.1 Overview 29 4.4.2 Kosrae 29 4.4.3 Kiribati 33 4.4.4 Nauru 35 December 2016 Final Baseline Data Report ii East Micronesia Cable Project 4.5 FISH 38 4.5.1 Kosrae 38 4.5.2 Kiribati 38 4.5.3 Nauru 41 5.
    [Show full text]
  • A Community Approach to Introducing Young Children to Early Mathematics: a Study of Kosraean Preschool Children in Their Homes
    A COMMUNITY APPROACH TO INTRODUCING YOUNG CHILDREN TO EARLY MATHEMATICS: A STUDY OF KOSRAEAN PRESCHOOL CHILDREN IN THEIR HOMES A DISSERTATION SUBMITTED TO THE GRADUATE DIVISION OF THE UNIVERSITY OF HAWAI‘I AT MĀNOA IN PARTIAL FULFILLMENT OF THE REQUIREMENTS FOR THE DEGREE OF DOCTOR OF PHILOSOPHY IN EDUCATION DECEMBER 2014 By Tulensru Waguk Dissertation Committee: Neil Pateman, Chairperson Sandy Dawson Betsy Brenner Tom Craven Jerry Lipka ABSTRACT This study seeks to determine the impact of parents at home on the development of mathematical concepts among young children of preschool age. This study also looks into the influences of other members of the family, relatives, and the community in the mathematics development of the child-research participant. It focuses on the influences of parents and other members of the family to their children’s mathematics learning at home or in the community The study seeks to answer the following questions: 1. How do parents influence preschool children’s mathematics learning? 2. How do other members of the family and people in the community contribute to the mathematics development of preschool children? To seek answers to these questions, case studies of families were developed from focus group meetings, interviews with parents, observations of children at their homes, and parents’ diaries of children activities, which were kept in the home. Findings suggest that the various environments; although they are all island environments, differently influence both the development of mathematical language and the range of mathematics activities in the homes and community in which each child lives. The nuclear family influences, the extended family influences, and neighbors’ influences contributed to the mathematics development of each child.
    [Show full text]
  • Federal Register/Vol. 67, No. 115/Friday, June 14
    Federal Register / Vol. 67, No. 115 / Friday, June 14, 2002 / Notices 40929 Program; 83.548, Hazard Mitigation Grant also be limited to 75 percent of the total Agency, Washington, DC 20472, (202) Program.) eligible costs. 646–2705 or [email protected]. Further, you are authorized to make Joe M. Allbaugh, SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The notice Director. changes to this declaration to the extent allowable under the Stafford Act. of a major disaster declaration for the [FR Doc. 02–15048 Filed 6–13–02; 8:45 am] State of Missouri is hereby amended to BILLING CODE 6718–02–P Notice is hereby given that pursuant include the following areas among those to the authority vested in the Director of areas determined to have been adversely the Federal Emergency Management affected by the catastrophe declared a FEDERAL EMERGENCY Agency under Executive Order 12148, I major disaster by the President in his MANAGEMENT AGENCY hereby appoint William L. Carwile III of declaration of May 6, 2002: the Federal Emergency Management [FEMA–1417–DR] Cedar, Crawford, Laclede, McDonald, Agency to act as the Federal Oregon, Ozark, Shannon, Ste. Genevieve, Federated States of Micronesia; Major Coordinating Officer for this declared Stone, Vernon, and Wright Counties for Disaster and Related Determinations disaster. Public Assistance (already designated for I do hereby determine the following Individual Assistance). AGENCY: Federal Emergency areas of the Federated States of Dekalb, Lincoln, Maries, Marion, Miller, Management Agency (FEMA). Micronesia to have been affected Osage, Phelps, Pike, Pulaski, Ralls, and Ray ACTION: Notice. adversely by this declared major Counties for Public Assistance. disaster: (The following Catalog of Federal Domestic SUMMARY: This is a notice of the Yap State for Public Assistance.
    [Show full text]
  • Protecting Kosrae's Upland Forest
    PROTECTING KOSRAE’S UPLAND FOREST BII OD VERSITY CEONS RVATION LESSONS LEARNED TECHNICAL SERIES 26 BIODIVERSITY CONSERVATION LESSONS LEARNED TECHNICAL SERIES 26 Protecting Kosrae’s Upland Forest Biodiversity Conservation Lessons Learned Technical Series is published by: Critical Ecosystem Partnership Fund (CEPF) and Conservation International Pacific Islands Program (CI-Pacific) PO Box 2035, Apia, Samoa T: + 685 21593 E: [email protected] W: www.conservation.org The Critical Ecosystem Partnership Fund is a joint initiative of l’Agence Française de Développement, Conservation International, the Global Environment Facility, the Government of Japan, the MacArthur Foundation and the World Bank. A fundamental goal is to ensure civil society is engaged in biodiversity conservation. Conservation International Pacific Islands Program. 2013. Biodiversity Conservation Lessons Learned Technical Series 26: Protecting Kosrae’s Upland Forest. Conservation International, Apia, Samoa Author: Jacob A Sanney, Kosrae Conservation and Safety Organization; John Mather, Pacific Invasives Initiative. Design/Production: Joanne Aitken, The Little Design Company, www.thelittledesigncompany.com Cover Photograph: © Jacob A Sanney, Kosrae Conservation and Safety Organization Series Editor: Leilani Duffy, Conservation International Pacific Islands Program Conservation International is a private, non-profit organization exempt from federal income tax under section 501c(3) of the Internal Revenue Code. OUR MISSION Building upon a strong foundation of science,
    [Show full text]
  • Saipan Carolinian, One Chuukic Language Blended from Many (PDF)
    SAIPAN CAROLINIAN, ONE CHUUKIC LANGUAGE BLENDED FROM MANY A DISSERTATION SUBMITTED TO THE GRADUATE DIVISION OF THE UNIVERSITY OF HAWAI‘I AT MĀNOA IN PARTIAL FULFILLMENT OF THE REQUIREMENTS FOR THE DEGREE OF DOCTOR OF PHILOSOPHY IN LINGUISTICS DECEMBER 2012 BY S. JAMES ELLIS Dissertation Committee: Kenneth L. Rehg, Chairperson Byron W. Bender William D. O‘Grady Yuko Otsuka David L. Hanlon Keywords: Saipan Carolinian, Blended Language, Chuukic, dialect chain, Carolinian language continuum, Language Bending, Micronesia i © Copyright 2012 by S. James Ellis ii ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS No section of this extensive study is more difficult than this one. There is such a great number of Carolinians, many no longer with us, and many other friends who have had an important part of my life and this work. And yet, in view of the typical rush to submit this just under the wire, many of you will be unintentionally missed. I can only apologize to those of you whose names I fail to list here, and I can only promise that when this dissertation is properly published, in due time, I will include you and recognize your valuable contribution. Those that come to mind, however, as of this writing, are Jesus Elameto and his wife, Vicky, who were the first Carolinians I met, and who made me an always-welcome member of the family, and cheerfully assisted and supported every aspect of my work through all these years. During those early days of intelligibility-testing research in the late 80s I also want to mention the role of Project Beam and the Jesuit community and the string of contacts made possible through our common interest in maintaining Carolinian languages.
    [Show full text]
  • Commonwealth of the Northern Mariana Islands
    Awane Marine Park Conservation Action Plan Lelu, Kosrae Federated States of Micronesia July 2010 Prepared by The Nature Conservancy Palau Field Office This report was prepared by The Nature Conservancy under cooperative agreement award #NA09NOS4190173 from the National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration's (NOAA) Coral Reef Conservation Program, U.S. Department of Commerce. The statements, findings, conclusions, and recommendations are those of the author(s) and do not necessarily reflect the views of NOAA, the NOAA Coral Reef Conservation Program, or the U.S. Department of Commerce. Facilitators and Resources Team: Name Organization Steven Victor, Co-facilitator The Nature Conservancy –Micronesia Program Umiich Sengebau Deputy Director for Conservation, TNC Micronesia Awane Marine Park CAP Participants Steven Palik Fisheries Specialist, Division of Marine Conservation & Surveillance Kosrae Island Resource Management Authority Simpson Abraham Poject Manager, FSM Pacific Adaptation to Climate Change (PACC) Project FSM National Government Leonard Sigrah Member, Lelu Resource Management Committee (LRMC) Lelu Town Government Aimina Likiaksa President, Lelu Women’s Association, Lelu Town Government Bruce Andrew Member, Utwe Resource Management Committee (URMC) Utwe Municipal Government Vision We the people of Lelu want to create a Marine Park that serves as a model for environmental awareness and conservation for the protection of our resources to promote wise use and to provide income generating activity to support our lives today and
    [Show full text]