DOCSLIB.ORG

PDF Download Vanished: the Sixty Year Search for the Missing Men

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
PDF Download Vanished: the Sixty Year Search for the Missing Men VANISHED: THE SIXTY YEAR SEARCH FOR THE MISSING MEN OF WORLD WAR II PDF, EPUB, EBOOK Wil S. Hylton | 304 pages | 04 Dec 2014 | Penguin Putnam Inc | 9781594632860 | English | New York, United States Vanished: The Sixty Year Search for the Missing Men of World War II PDF Book The U. Several armored divisions massed in the Ardennes with the goal of breaking through Allied lines. Battle of Britain: July—October Hitler's plan to attack Soviet Russia was called Operation Barbarossa, and it sure looked insane on paper given the Russian numerical superiority and the ignominious history of enemy forces invading Russia. More From Naval Vessels. The siege claimed more than , Soviet lives in a single year alone due to starvation, disease, and shelling. The largest amphibious operation in history involved more than 5, ships landing Allied troops on a heavily- defended mile stretch of Normandy coastline, while thousands more took part in an airborne assault. Dive bombers and torpedo bombers attacked ships protected by screens of fighters. The Russians had the advantage in tanks, but armored vehicles were vulnerable to new portable anti-tank rockets that destroyed 2, of them. Instead of just releasing the child, the Navy threw him in the brig for three months in Texas, only releasing him when his sister threatened to contact the media. But even then, Graham wasn't able to find receipts from many doctors who had died in the time since he received treatment, and much of the money went unused. Second Battle of Kharkov: May Battle of the Coral Sea: May After having gained both Austria and Czechoslovakia, Hitler was confident that he could again move east, this time acquiring Poland without having to fight Britain or France. In the s, faking your identity was a whole lot easier than it is today. The intense air assault quickly demoralized the defenders and the German forces easily broke through. Adolf Hitler wanted more land, to expand Germany according to the Nazi policy of "lebensraum"—a German word meaning roughly "living space," and lebensraum served as Hitler's justification for expanding his empire eastward. The Allies surrendered after two weeks of fighting. Stalin aimed to drive back the invading German armies with an offensive that included more than a thousand tanks backed by aircraft. World War II was one of the greatest conflicts in history and was carried out on a scale almost impossible to grasp. She even sank the Imperial Japanese Navy submarine I , despite submarine vs. Taylor noticed two anomalies just as the AUV began to malfunction, and sent another unmanned submersible armed with cameras to investigate. Updated March 23, Operation Citadel was the final German offensive on the Eastern front, and Kursk is considered the greatest tank battle of the war. There's a Secret Organ in Your Head. Vanished: The Sixty Year Search for the Missing Men of World War II Writer The Germans had limited supplies and could only fight for few days to before fuel and ammunition ran out, so the offensive soon ran out of steam. Success was bought at the cost of more than 50, casualties on the Allied side. Both sides lost more than , soldiers combined. In fact it was a massive and extreme bloody action as three quarters of a million German troops, under the personal command of Hitler, fought a desperate final defense against the encroaching Red Army. At first the German progress was rapid; by November 15 of they had fought to within 18 miles of the city. Afterwards Germany lacked resources for another offensive and the end was inevitable. Eventually the German force was itself surrounded. Watch a Spacecraft Punch an Asteroid Tonight. Learn more about what led to Germany's aggression and how other countries reacted. More than a quarter of a million Russian soldiers were killed, injured, or captured, 10 times the number of German casualties. In the s, faking your identity was a whole lot easier than it is today. Casualties were heavy, including thousands of civilians. Midway was a catastrophic defeat from which the Imperial Japanese Navy never fully recovered. Lo was sunk after a Japanese kamikaze carrying a bomb deliberately crashed on its deck. All four Japanese light carriers were sunk, as were three battleships. Battle of Monte Cassino: January—May The Russians had the advantage in tanks, but armored vehicles were vulnerable to new portable anti-tank rockets that destroyed 2, of them. Getty Images. After having gained both Austria and Czechoslovakia, Hitler was confident that he could again move east, this time acquiring Poland without having to fight Britain or France. This content is imported from YouTube. There's a Secret Organ in Your Head. Second Battle of Kharkov: May This content is created and maintained by a third party, and imported onto this page to help users provide their email addresses. Advertisement - Continue Reading Below. The siege claimed more than , Soviet lives in a single year alone due to starvation, disease, and shelling. Thanks to Allied codebreakers, though, the Russians got advance warning and built up defensive lines of ditches and minefields to absorb the German attack. Here's the whole vast panoramic epic of the Second World War presented in several of its most significant battles. Navy to fight in World War II. Battle of the Bulge: December —January This was the location of the millimeter 3-inch deck gun, which was blown off by the Japanese aerial bomb. More From Naval Vessels. Battle of Moscow: October —January On the fifth, Omaha Beach, U. Many positions could be cleared only out by hand grenades and flamethrowers, including the fearsome M4A3R3 Sherman "Zippo" flamethrower tanks. Type keyword s to search. On the 30th of April Hitler killed himself rather than surrender, effectively ending the war in Europe. Grayback sank 14 Japanese ships, or 63, tons of enemy shipping, a figure that translates into nearly 40 times the submarine's own weight. The largest naval battle in history, the Battle of Leyte Gulf off the Philippines was another step in the U. Explorers located the deck gun feet from the submarine. At this time, Great Britain and France did not understand that Hitler's hunger for land acquisition was much, much more ambitious than any one country could slake. The intense air assault quickly demoralized the defenders and the German forces easily broke through. That line of thinking clearly led to the French strategy of constructing the heavy concrete fortifications of the Maginot Line. Battle of the Philippine Sea: June But even then, Graham wasn't able to find receipts from many doctors who had died in the time since he received treatment, and much of the money went unused. Allied lines bulged but did not break, and hundreds of thousands of reinforcements poured into the area. Navy via Navsource. Vanished: The Sixty Year Search for the Missing Men of World War II Reviews A Japanese researcher discovered the coordinates of the sinking were mistranslated. Battle of Britain: July—October The Russians had the advantage in tanks, but armored vehicles were vulnerable to new portable anti-tank rockets that destroyed 2, of them. There's a Secret Organ in Your Head. The Germans were pushed back by more than miles by January. Type keyword s to search. With only 40 divisions, none of which were armored, and with nearly their entire air force demolished, the Poles were at a severe disadvantage. This forced submarines like Grayback to operate on the surface whenever possible, submerging at the first sign of the enemy. The diesel engines of conventionally powered submarines cannot operate while the sub is underwater. Within a week the Allies had landed more than , troops in Normandy. Battle of the Atlantic: September —May USS Grayback , a U. The search was conducted by U. All Graham had to do was fake his mother's signature and steal a notary stamp. Those expectations where shattered in May when the Germans launched a fast-paced "Blitzkreig" "lightning war" spearheaded by Panzer tanks. Today, the battle is mainly remembered for the destruction of the abbey of Monte Cassino which was sheltering civilians by more than a hundred B Flying Fortresses, when the Allies mistakenly believed the abbey to be a German artillery observation position. D-Day: June Germany successfully used this reasoning to envelop two entire countries without starting a war. It was Heinrich Himmler who came up with the idea; thus the plan was code-named Operation Himmler. Once the Nazis gained air superiority, landings by sea followed. The AUV scanned the seabed below, beaming data to the surface for analysis. The Navy realized she had been lost in March, after she was reported overdue returning to Midway Island. Grayback was feet long and 27 feet wide, with a top speed of Today's Top Stories. A Japanese force including five large fleet carriers and four light carriers, plus some land-based aircraft, fought seven U. The staged scene with the dead prisoner dressed in a Polish uniform was supposed to appear as a Polish attack against a German radio station. Advertisement - Continue Reading Below. Vanished: The Sixty Year Search for the Missing Men of World War II Read Online By using ThoughtCo, you accept our. The largest naval battle in history, the Battle of Leyte Gulf off the Philippines was another step in the U. This content is created and maintained by a third party, and imported onto this page to help users provide their email addresses. Getty Images. The battle consisted of two phases: the Battle for Narva Bridgehead and the Battle of Tannenberg Line; the USSR—Stalin in particular—wanted to take control of Estonia and use strategic locations in the country to attack Finland and Prussia via sea and air.
Load more

Recommended publications
  • English Reactions to the Franco-Prussian War Andrew Mcginnis
    View metadata, citation and similar papers at core.ac.uk brought to you by CORE provided by Virtual Commons - Bridgewater State University Bridgewater State University Virtual Commons - Bridgewater State University Honors Program Theses and Projects Undergraduate Honors Program 12-17-2015 A Snapshot in Time: English Reactions to the Franco-Prussian War Andrew McGinnis Follow this and additional works at: http://vc.bridgew.edu/honors_proj Part of the European History Commons Recommended Citation McGinnis, Andrew. (2015). A Snapshot in Time: English Reactions to the Franco-Prussian War. In BSU Honors Program Theses and Projects. Item 125. Available at: http://vc.bridgew.edu/honors_proj/125 Copyright © 2015 Andrew McGinnis This item is available as part of Virtual Commons, the open-access institutional repository of Bridgewater State University, Bridgewater, Massachusetts. A Snapshot in Time: English Reactions to the Franco-Prussian War Andrew McGinnis Submitted in Partial Completion of the Requirements for Commonwealth Honors in History Bridgewater State University December 17, 2015 Dr. Leonid Heretz, Thesis Director Dr. Thomas Nester, Committee Member Dr. Sarah Wiggins, Committee Member A Snapshot in Time: English Reactions to the Franco-Prussian War Andrew McGinnis 13 December 2015 2 The decade culminating in 1871 was filled with turmoil and forceful politics that united Germany under Prussian control. The major event that completed this process was the Franco- Prussian War of 1870-1871. This war led to a change in the status quo. It both weakened France’s power and strengthened the legitimacy of a unified Germany under Prussia. In the 19th Century, Great Britain was the dominant country in European power politics.
    [Show full text]
  • Timeline - May 1940
    TIMELINE - MAY 1940 As the month begins the battle for Norway continues. Just to recap, German naval and ground forces had begun invading both Norway and Denmark on 9th April. Denmark had quickly capitulated but Norway had resisted. British forces were sent to Andalsnes on 18th April to 1st May, Namsos on 16th April to 3rd May, and Narvik from 15th April to 8th June. They were joined by Norwegian, French and Polish forces. But as May begins the evacuation of Allied troops from some of these areas is already underway and nearing completion. With the failure of the campaign for central Norway attention shifts to Narvik in the far north, strategically vital to the Germans for the shipping of iron ore from Sweden. 1 On 2nd May German troops reached Andalsnes, and on the following day Norwegian troops south of Trondheim surrendered to the Germans. The allied evacuation at Namsos was completed, but German aircraft located part of the evacuation fleet and sank the destroyers Afridi and Bison. The Bison was a French destroyer and she was the first to be sunk with the loss of 136 of her crew. The surviving crew were then picked up by the Afridi. But when that ship came under attack a further 35 of her crew were lost, along with 53 of the Afridi’s crew and 13 soldiers - the only casualties among the whole force of 12,000 troops evacuated from Åndalsnes and Namsos On 5th May the Battle of Hegra Fortress ended when the fortress capitulated. The Germans had now achieved complete victory on Norway’s southern front.
    [Show full text]
  • Debating Cannae: Delbrück, Schlieffen, and the Great War Andrew Loren Jones East Tennessee State University
    East Tennessee State University Digital Commons @ East Tennessee State University Electronic Theses and Dissertations Student Works 5-2014 Debating Cannae: Delbrück, Schlieffen, and the Great War Andrew Loren Jones East Tennessee State University Follow this and additional works at: https://dc.etsu.edu/etd Part of the European History Commons, and the Military History Commons Recommended Citation Jones, Andrew Loren, "Debating Cannae: Delbrück, Schlieffen, and the Great War" (2014). Electronic Theses and Dissertations. Paper 2387. https://dc.etsu.edu/etd/2387 This Thesis - Open Access is brought to you for free and open access by the Student Works at Digital Commons @ East Tennessee State University. It has been accepted for inclusion in Electronic Theses and Dissertations by an authorized administrator of Digital Commons @ East Tennessee State University. For more information, please contact [email protected]. Debating Cannae: Delbrück, Schlieffen, and the Great War ___________________________________________ A thesis presented to the faculty of the Department of History East Tennessee State University in partial fulfillment of the requirements for the degree Master of Arts in History ________________________________________ by Andrew L. Jones May 2014 ________________________________________ Dr. Stephen G. Fritz, Chair Dr. Dinah Mayo-Bobee Dr. John M. Rankin Keywords: Nationalism, Delbrück, Schlieffen, German War Planning, Germany, Sedan, Moltke, War Enthusiasm, German Wars of Unification, World War I ABSTRACT Debating Cannae: Delbrück, Schlieffen, and the Great War by Andrew L. Jones Debating Cannae: Delbrück, Schlieffen, and the Great War provides the reader a view of the historical struggle between Alfred von Schlieffen and Hans Delbrück. They argued fiercely about the foundation of the German Empire and the use of history.
    [Show full text]
  • The French Military During 1870
    University of Massachusetts Amherst ScholarWorks@UMass Amherst Masters Theses 1911 - February 2014 1964 The rF ench military during 1870,: in light of the tradition and strategy of Napoleon Bonaparte. Robert Fernand Forest University of Massachusetts Amherst Follow this and additional works at: https://scholarworks.umass.edu/theses Forest, Robert Fernand, "The rF ench military during 1870,: in light of the tradition and strategy of Napoleon Bonaparte." (1964). Masters Theses 1911 - February 2014. 1519. Retrieved from https://scholarworks.umass.edu/theses/1519 This thesis is brought to you for free and open access by ScholarWorks@UMass Amherst. It has been accepted for inclusion in Masters Theses 1911 - February 2014 by an authorized administrator of ScholarWorks@UMass Amherst. For more information, please contact [email protected]. FIVE COLLEGE DEPOSITORY THE FRENCH MILITARY DURING 1870 IN LIGHT OF THE TRADITION AND STRiVTEGY OF NAPOLEON 30NAPi\RTE by Robert F. Forest B.S.E. Westfield State College M.Ed. University of Massachusetts Thesis submitted to the Graduate Faculty in partial fulfillment of the requirements for the degree of Master of Arts. University of Massachusetts, Amherst May, 1964 In the preparation of this paper, I am indebted to my wife, Barbara, for her patience and assistance and to Paul A, Gagnon, whose guidance and suggestions were indispensable for the completion of this thesis. TABLE OF CONTENTS I. INTRODUCTION 1 II. NAPOLEONIC ARMIES ... ' • »••• 3 III. CHANGES FROM NaPOLEON I TO 1870 13 Changes in Prussia 13 Material and Technological Developments ....oo,. •••• 20 Changes in French Military Doctrine Before 1851 26 Changes During the Second Empire , 32 IV.
    [Show full text]
  • Conflict Simulations LLC Imperial Bayonets- We Were Not Cowards: Sedan 1870
    Conflict Simulations LLC Imperial Bayonets- We Were Not Cowards: Sedan 1870 Conflict Simulations LLC Imperial Bayonets- We Were Not Cowards: Sedan 1870 Table of Contents We Were Not Cowards: Sedan 1870 Exclusive Rules 1.0 Introduction 3 2.0 Exclusive Rules 4 2.1 Stacking Limits 4 2.2 Division Breakdown and Recombination 5 2.3 French Chassepot Fire 5 2.4 Mitrailleuse Support 5 2.5 Artillery Range & Spotting 5 2.5.1 Artillery Defending Alone 6 2.5.2 Krupp Steel 6 2.6 “Death Ride” Charges 6 2.7 River Crossings 6 3.0 Scenarios 7 3.1 Historical Action at La Moncelle (Introductory Scenario) 7 3.1.1 French Setup 7 3.1.2 Prussian Setup 7 3.1.3 Special Scenario Rules 8 3.1.3.1 Playing Area Restrictions 8 3.1.3.2 MacMahon Leaves Command 8 3.1.4 Victory Conditions 8 3.2 Historical Day of Battle 8 3.2.1 French Setup 8 3.2.2 Prussian Setup 9 3.2.3 Special Scenario Rules 9 3.2.3.1 The French V Corps 9 3.2.3.2 MacMahon Wounded 9 3.2.3.2.1 Ducrot Takes Command 10 3.2.3.2.2 Wimpffen Takes Command 10 3.2.3.3 March Orders 10 3.2.3.4 Napoleon III 10 3.2.4 Victory Conditions 11 3.3 What-If Approach to Battle Setup 11 3.3.1 French and German Setup 12 3.3.2 Scenario Special Rules 12 3.3.2.1 Prussian Traffic Jams 12 3.3.2.2 French Command Chaos 12 3.3.2.2.1 French Attrition 13 3.3.2.3 March Orders 13 3.3.2.4 French V Corps 13 3.3.2.5 (Optional) MacMahon Wounded 13 3.3.3 Victory Conditions 13 3.4 Variant What-If (Optional) 13 3.5 Free Setup 13 4.0 Designers Notes 14 5.0 Counter Infographic 16 2 Conflict Simulations LLC Imperial Bayonets- We Were Not Cowards: Sedan 1870 IMPERIAL BAYONETS - We Were Not Cowards: Sedan 1870 & the Fall of the Second Empire Exclusive Rules by Ray Weiss Developed by Matt Ward 1.0 INTRODUCTION These are the exclusive rules for Imperial Bayonets – We Were Not Cowards: Sedan 1870 & the Fall of the Second Empire.
    [Show full text]
  • AAKASH PATEL Contents
    History AAKASH PATEL Contents Preface. 1 1. Dawn of Civilization. 2 Mesopotamia . 2 Ancient Egypt . 3 Indus River Valley . 5 2. Ancient Europe . 6 Persian Wars . 6 Greek City-States. 8 Rome: From Romulus to Constantine . 9 3. Asian Dynasties. 23 Ancient India. 23 Chinese Dynasties . 24 Early Korea . 27 4. The Sundering of Europe . 29 The Fall of Rome. 29 Building a Holy Roman Empire . 31 Islamic Caliphates . 33 5. Medieval Times . 35 England: A New Monarchy . 35 France: The Capetians. 42 Germany: Holy Roman Empire. 44 Scandinavia: Kalmar Union. 45 Crusades . 46 Khans & Conquerors . 50 6. African Empires . 53 West Africa . 53 South Africa. 54 7. Renaissance & Reformation. 56 Italian Renaissance . 56 Tudor England . 58 Reformation. 61 Habsburg Empires . 63 French Wars of Religion. 65 Age of Discovery. 66 8. Early Modern Asia . 70 Tsars of Russia . 70 Japan: Rise of the Shogun. 72 Dynastic Korea . 73 Mughals of India. 73 Ottomans of Turkey. 74 9. European Monarchy . 76 Thirty Years' War . 76 Stuart England and the Protectorate . 78 France: Louis, Louis, and Louis . 81 10. Colonies of the New World . 84 Pilgrims and Plymouth . 84 Thirteen American Colonies . 85 Golden Age of Piracy . 88 11. Expansionism in Europe. 89 Ascension of the Romanovs. 89 Rise of Prussia . 91 Seven Years' War . 92 Enlightenment . 93 Hanoverian Succession. 94 12. American Independence . 96 Colonies in the 18th Century . ..
    [Show full text]
  • Joint Force Quarterly 96
    Issue 96, 1st Quarter 2020 JOINT FORCE QUARTERLY ISSUE NINETY-SIX, 1 ISSUE NINETY-SIX, The Intellectual Edge and Future War ST st QUARTER 2020 DOD Labs for the 21 Century Megacities and the Joint Force Joint Force Quarterly Founded in 1993 • Vol. 96, 1st Quarter 2020 http://ndupress.ndu.edu GEN Mark A. Milley, USA, Publisher VADM Frederick J. Roegge, USN, President, NDU Editor in Chief Col William T. Eliason, USAF (Ret.), Ph.D. Executive Editor Jeffrey D. Smotherman, Ph.D. Production Editor John J. Church, D.M.A. Internet Publications Editor Joanna E. Seich Copyeditor Andrea L. Connell Associate Editor Jack Godwin, Ph.D. Book Review Editor Brett Swaney Art Director Marco Marchegiani, U.S. Government Publishing Office Advisory Committee Ambassador Erica Barks-Ruggles/College of International Security Affairs; RDML Shoshana S. Chatfield, USN/U.S. Naval War College; Col Thomas J. Gordon, USMC/Marine Corps Command and Staff College; MG Lewis G. Irwin, USAR/Joint Forces Staff College; MG John S. Kem, USA/U.S. Army War College; Cassandra C. Lewis, Ph.D./College of Information and Cyberspace; LTG Michael D. Lundy, USA/U.S. Army Command and General Staff College; LtGen Daniel J. O’Donohue, USMC/The Joint Staff; Brig Gen Evan L. Pettus, USAF/Air Command and Staff College; RDML Cedric E. Pringle, USN/National War College; Brig Gen Kyle W. Robinson, USAF/Dwight D. Eisenhower School for National Security and Resource Strategy; Brig Gen Jeremy T. Sloane, USAF/Air War College; Col Blair J. Sokol, USMC/Marine Corps War College; Lt Gen Glen D.
    [Show full text]
  • Political Conspiracy in Napoleonic France: the Malet Affair Kelly Diane Whittaker Louisiana State University and Agricultural and Mechanical College
    Louisiana State University LSU Digital Commons LSU Master's Theses Graduate School 2007 Political conspiracy in Napoleonic France: the Malet affair Kelly Diane Whittaker Louisiana State University and Agricultural and Mechanical College Follow this and additional works at: https://digitalcommons.lsu.edu/gradschool_theses Part of the History Commons Recommended Citation Whittaker, Kelly Diane, "Political conspiracy in Napoleonic France: the Malet affair" (2007). LSU Master's Theses. 1437. https://digitalcommons.lsu.edu/gradschool_theses/1437 This Thesis is brought to you for free and open access by the Graduate School at LSU Digital Commons. It has been accepted for inclusion in LSU Master's Theses by an authorized graduate school editor of LSU Digital Commons. For more information, please contact [email protected]. POLITICAL CONSPIRACY IN NAPOLEONIC FRANCE: THE MALET AFFAIR A Thesis Submitted to the Graduate Faculty of the Louisiana State University and Agricultural and Mechanical College in partial fulfillment of the requirements for the degree of Master of Arts In The Department of History by Kelly Diane Whittaker B.A., Virginia Polytechnic Institute and State University, 2002 December, 2007 TABLE OF CONTENTS Abstract . iii Introduction . .1 Chapter One General Malet: A Biography . 8 Two Hopes and Disappointments in Napoleonic France . 46 Three General Malet’s Final Attempt, 22 October 1812 . 73 Conclusion . 95 Notes . .100 Bibliography . .112 Vita . 115 ii ABSTRACT The French Revolution ushered in a period of political unrest in France which appeared never-ending, even when a seemingly stable government rose to power. After a series of failed Republican governments, Napoleon Bonaparte seized control on 18 Brumaire VIII, promising to uphold the revolutionary ideals that had permeated the nation.
    [Show full text]
  • Sedan, 1940 a Flames of War Mega-Game Scenario
    Battle of Sedan, 1940 A Flames of War Mega-Game Scenario After a long period of stagnation following the fall of Poland, Germany opened the 1940 campaign in the west with a stunning blitzkrieg into Holland, Belgium and Luxembourg. While a set of dramatic assaults fixed Allied attention in the north, a strong force spearheaded by seven panzer divisions pushed through the Ardennes forest. If they could punch through the Allied defenses along the Meuse River, they could then slice through northern France, isolating and then destroying the Allied Northern Group of Armies. This scenario allows a series of large tables to accommodate a scaled down version of the area south and west of Sedan, as the Germans try to consolidate their bridgehead and push west to start their run for the channel. This sector saw some of the most severe fighting of the entire campaign, and provides an opportunity to field a wide variety of Early War units from the German and French armies. Special Terrain rules: • Towns – this area of northern France was dotted with small villages. Their buildings were for the most part quite substantial – any stand touching a building should be treated as in concealing terrain and bulletproof cover. • Heights – the terrain in this area was quite undulating, especially near the rivers. The elevated area known as Mont Dieu had a high tactical importance, as it commanded the immediate area. Any unit or vehicle on the heights can see over lower level forest or buildings. The edges of the heights (anywhere on the height and within 4” from the edge) are treated as difficult ground, and no team may see or be seen through more than 8” of heights.
    [Show full text]
  • WWII Dunkirk
    Dunkirk Everything You Need to Know Before Seeing the Movie Christopher Nolan’s film Dunkirk inspired new attention to the famous evacuation by sea, in 1940, of four hundred thousand British troops under harrowing air attack. Had that evacuation failed, the United Kingdom would have been deprived of a land army to oppose Nazi Germany. But before Dunkirk, British and French troops fought desperate last stands in the channel ports of Calais and Boulogne that bought vital time for the evacuation in the Belgian Port. The situation grew so desperate at Boulogne that Allied destroyers were forced to blast their way into and back out of the harbor, using naval guns to duel with tanks, field guns and even snipers while evacuating panicky mobs of British soldiers. How did the British Expeditionary Force fall into such dire circumstances in the first place? Twelve days earlier on May 10, 1940, the German tanks and paratroopers of Army Group B smashed through Holland and Belgium in an apparent effort to bypass the Maginot Line’s fortifications on the Franco-German border. The British and French were expecting exactly such a flanking maneuver, and their own elite units surged north to tackle the Germans in Belgium, while French second-line infantry divisions continued to man the Maginot Line defenses. At the hinge of the Allied mobile response force to the north and the static Maginot Line to the south lay the Ardennes Forest, which the French considered impassable to tanks and artillery due to the combination of defense wooded terrain with the natural barrier of the Meuse River.
    [Show full text]
  • The Nafziger
    THE NAFZIGER ORDERS OF BATTLE COLLECTION FINDING A ID DOCUMENTS AVAILABLE IN PDF FORMAT AT: http://www.cgsc.edu/carl/nafziger.htm This collection contains a compilation of orders of battle from 1600 to 1945. Sources range from published works to primary archival documents. Most orders of battle break down to the regimental level and many contain information regarding the availability of strength figures and artillery equipment. FILE NAME: DOCUMENT TITLE: 625XAA Distribution, Imperial Forces of Holy Roman Empire, 1625 625XHRA Army of the Holy Roman Empire, 1625 626XAA Distribution, Imperial Forces of Holy Roman Empire, 1626 626XHRA Army of the Holy Roman Empire, 1626 627XHRA Army of the Holy Roman Empire, 1627 628XAA Distribution, Imperial Forces of Holy Roman Empire, 1628 628XHRA Army of the Holy Roman Empire, 1628 629XHRA Army of the Holy Roman Empire, 1629 630XHRA Army of the Holy Roman Empire, 1630 631BAA Distribution of the Imperial Army in Northern Germany, February 1631 631CAA Swedish Army, 7 March 1631 631IAA Swedish and Saxon Forces, Battle of Breitenfeld, 17 September 1631 631IAB Imperial Forces, Battle of Breitenfeld, 17 September 1631 631JAA Swedish and Associated Protestant Armies, October-November 1631 631XAA Swedish Reinforcements Sent to Germany 1631 631XHRA Army of the Holy Roman Empire, 1631 632CAA Protestant Army, Donauworth, March 1632 632CAB Tilly's (Catholic) Army on the Danube, March 1632 632HAA Swedish Main Army, Battle of Alte Veste, (by Nurnberg) 29 August 1632 632KAA Catholic Army in Germany, November 1632 632KAB
    [Show full text]
  • The Development of Combat Effective Divisions in the United States Army
    THE DEVELOPMENT OF COMBAT EFFECTIVE DIVISIONS IN THE UNITED STATES ARMY DURING WORLD WAR II A Thesis Presented in Partial Fulfillment of the Requirements for the degree Master of Arts in the Graduate School of The Ohio State University by Peter R. Mansoor, B.S. * * * * * The Ohio State University 1992 Master's Examination Committee: Approved by Allan R. Millett Williamson Murray ~~~ Allan R. Millett Warren R. Van Tine Department of History ACKNOWLEDGMENTS I express sincere appreciation to Dr. Allan R. Millett for his guidance in the preparation of this thesis. I also would like to thank Dr. Williamson Murray and Dr. John F. Guilmartin for their support and encouragement during my research. I gratefully acknowledge the assistance of Dr. Richard Sommers and Dr. David Keough at the United States Army Military History Institute in Carlisle Barracks, Pennsylvania, and Dr. Timothy Nenninger and Dr. Richard Boylan at the Modern Military Records Branch of the National Archives in Suitland, Maryland. Without their professional assistance, I would not have been able to complete the research for this thesis. As always, my wife Jana and daughter Kyle proved to be towers of support, even when daddy "played on the computer" for hours on end. ii VITA February 28, 1960 . Born - New Ulm, Minnesota 1982 . B.S., United States Military Academy, West Point, New York 1982-Present ......... Officer, United States Army PUBLICATIONS "The Defense of the Vienna Bridgehead," Armor 95, no. 1 (Jan.-Feb. 1986): 26-32. "The Second Battle of Sedan, May 1940," Military Review 68, no. 6 (June 1988): 64-75. "The Ten Lean Years, 1930-1940," editor, Armor 96, no.
    [Show full text]