DOCSLIB.ORG

Inception Report

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Inception Report PPAANN--EEUURROOSSTTAARR Pan-European Transport Corridors and Areas Status Report Project N° TREN/B2/26/2004 Final Report Developments and Activities between 1994 and 2003 / Forecast until 2010 Title of Working Document: Final Report Nature: Contractual Document Date of Preparation: 24 November 2005 Issued by: HB-Verkehrsconsult GmbH Neuer Wall 72 D-20354 Hamburg Germany phone: +49 40 36 96 92-0 fax: +49 40 36 96 92-36 e-mail: [email protected] and VTT Technical Research Centre of Finland Lämpömiehenkuja 2 C FIN-02044 Espoo Finland phone: +358 20 722 111 fax +358 20 722 7031 e-mail: [email protected] … PAN-EUROSTAR Document History Version Date Nature Alterations 0.1 Sept. 2005 First draft for internal discussion 1.0 Sept. 2005 Draft final report for comments from DG TREN 2.0 Nov. 2005 Final Report Comments from DG TREN taken into account; individual updates Page 2 31 January 2006 PAN-EUROSTAR Table of Contents 1 Introduction 6 2 Methodology 7 2.1 Data Collection and Desk Research 8 2.2 Database 8 2.3 Mapping 9 3 Analysis of External Resources 11 3.1 Previous Reports 11 3.2 Websites of Corridor Administrations 11 3.3 Related reports 12 3.4 Conclusions for the new status report 12 4 Introduction to the Pan-European Transport Corridors and Areas 13 4.1 History and Concept 13 4.2 Geographical Alignment 13 4.3 Financing Instruments 15 5 Status of the Pan-European Transport Corridors 17 5.1 Corridor I 17 5.1.1 Map, Alignment and Technical Features 17 5.1.2 Overview of the General Development 18 5.1.3 Developments along the Corridor between 1994 and 2010 23 5.1.4 Infrastructure Development per Country and Mode of Transport 24 5.2 Corridor II 35 5.2.1 Map, Alignment and Technical Features 35 5.2.2 Overview of the General Development 36 5.2.3 Developments along the Corridor between 1994 and 2010 37 5.2.4 Infrastructure Development per Country and Mode of Transport 38 5.3 Corridor III 49 5.3.1 Map, Alignment and Technical Features 49 5.3.2 Overview of the General Development 50 5.3.3 Developments along the Corridor between 1994 and 2010 51 5.3.4 Infrastructure Development per Country and Mode of Transport 51 31 January 2006 Page 3 PAN-EUROSTAR 5.4 Corridor IV 58 5.4.1 Map, Alignment and Technical Features 58 5.4.2 Overview of the General Development 60 5.4.3 Infrastructure Development per Country and Mode of Transport 61 5.5 Corridor V 78 5.5.1 Map, Alignment and Technical Features 78 5.5.2 Overview of the General Development 81 5.5.3 Developments along the Corridor between 1994 and 2010 82 5.5.4 Infrastructure Development per Country and Mode of Transport 84 5.6 Corridor VI 101 5.6.1 Map, Alignment and Technical Features 101 5.6.2 Overview of the General Development 103 5.6.3 Infrastructure Development per Country and Mode of Transport 103 5.7 Corridor VII 111 5.7.1 Map, Alignment and Technical Features 111 5.7.2 Overview of the General Development 111 5.7.3 Infrastructure Development per Country and Mode of Transport 114 5.8 Corridor VIII 121 5.8.1 Map, Alignment and Technical Features 121 5.8.2 Overview of the General Development 122 5.8.3 Developments along the Corridor between 1994 and 2010 123 5.8.4 Infrastructure Development per Country and Mode of Transport 125 5.9 Corridor IX 131 5.9.1 Map, Alignment and Technical Features 131 5.9.2 Overview of the General Development 132 5.9.3 Developments along the Corridor between 1994 and 2010 133 5.9.4 Infrastructure Development per Country and Mode of Transport 134 5.10 Corridor X 142 5.10.1 Map, Alignment and Technical Features 142 5.10.2 Overview of the General Development 144 5.10.3 Infrastructure Development per Country and Mode of Transport 144 Page 4 31 January 2006 PAN-EUROSTAR 6 Status of the Pan-European Transport Areas 164 6.1 Barents-Euro-Arctic Transport Area 164 6.1.1 Map, Extent and Technical Features 164 6.1.2 Overview of the General Development 165 6.1.3 Developments within the area between 1994 and 2010 166 6.1.4 Infrastructure Development per Country and Mode of Transport 168 6.2 Black Sea Transport Area 171 6.2.1 Map, Extent and Technical Features 171 6.2.2 Overview of the General Development 172 6.2.3 Developments within the area between 1994 and 2010 176 6.3 Adriatic-Ionian Transport Area 178 6.3.1 Map, Extent and Technical Features 178 6.3.2 Overview of the General Development 179 6.3.3 Developments within the area between 1994 and 2010 180 6.3.4 Infrastructure Development per Country and Mode of Transport 183 6.4 Mediterranean Transport Area 184 6.4.1 Map, Extent and Technical Features 184 6.4.2 Overview of the General Development 184 7 Contacts 198 Annex A: Questionnaires (separate document file) Annex B: Corridor Maps (separate jpg-files on CD ROM) 31 January 2006 Page 5 PAN-EUROSTAR 1 Introduction On a regular basis, a status report of the Pan-European Transport Corridors and Areas is tendered by the European Commission in order to monitor the progress, performance and financing of the Transport Corridors and Areas. A status report provides updated inventories of Pan-European Transport Corridors and Areas for the respective countries and modes of transportation. The objective is to enable comparisons of the achievements between the individual Corridors and Areas, and to keep track of the progress of the transport infrastructure development, investment and financing sources. Since the previous status report of 2002, many projects and initiatives along the Pan- European Transport Corridors and Areas have been undertaken in order to maintain and improve the quality and capacity of the transport infrastructure. In addition, the European Union experienced the largest extension ever in 2004, encompassing ten new member countries. In this context, the role of the respective Transport Corridors and Areas as important transit and trade routes and for freight and passenger traffic has grown significantly. This document is the 2005 status report on the Pan-European Tranport Corridors and Areas . It differs from the previous reports in that it covers a much wider period of time. For this report the corridor representatives have been asked to provide data from the beginning of the initiative, i.e. the second Pan-European conference on Crete in 1994, until the envisaged completion of the routes in 2010. First of all, this report outlines the methodology applied for this study, explaining the approach to cooperation with the Corridor and Area representatives, to data collection and evaluation as well as to the map production. Then, a general introduction to the Corridor and Area concept and its history is being given and the most common financing instruments are explained. Finally, other sources of information are summarized and commented on. The main part of this report consists of the compilation of data and information concerning individual Corridors and Areas. For each Corridor and Area, a summary of the general characteristics, developments, project progress, investment and financing sources is provided. Page 6 31 January 2006 PAN-EUROSTAR 2 Methodology This status report was prepared by a consortium consisting of Jaakko Pöyry Infra/HB- Verkehrsconsult, Hamburg/Germany; VTT-Technical Research Centre of Finland, Espoo; and ANSERI-Consultants Ltd, Helsinki/Finland. The time for compiling this report and producing the relevant maps was 8 months. The role of the consortium partners was to structure the information needs, to collect the information from the Corridor/Area representatives in a harmonised way and to compile the information in the status report. Furthermore, maps were to be produced using a GIS displaying the collected information graphically. In the tender document the consortium has proposed an approach to the task of data collection for the expected status report on Pan-European Corridors and Areas. After the initial contacts with DG TREN in the first weeks after the beginning of the project, a basic concept for the data collection process, as well as activities for its preparation were presented by the consortium. As a starting point it was suggested to analyse the previous status report from the years 2000 and 2001, published in 2002. Another source of information for the new status report were the existing web sites of the corridor administrations. However, in terms of content the few sites differ significantly. Lastly, a considerable amount of desk research has been done by the consortium in order to gather the required information. Some reports produced in the context of other projects from the European Commission were a fruitful source of relevant data. Special attention has been paid to the fact that following the enlargement of the European Community, the corridors originally defined in the Crete Declaration in 1994 (apart from Corridor X which was added at the Helsinki Conference in 1997) are now part of the trans- European transport network (TEN) Regarding the methodology of the status report, three working fields have to be distinguished: Data Collection Development of a database Mapping These three activities are not successive steps but rather interconnected with each other. Obviously, data has to be collected before it can be entered into a database or plotted on a map, but in order to be able to define the type of data to be collected and the degree of its precision, it is necessary to be clear about how to structure the database and how to display the information on a map later.
Load more

Recommended publications
  • Information Current As of November 18, 2020
    Information Current as of November 18, 2020 Table of Contents SOURCEREE PERSPECTIVE ............................................................................................3 OVERVIEW .........................................................................................................................6 WEBSITES ...........................................................................................................................6 OWNERSHIP .......................................................................................................................6 OBJECTIVES ......................................................................................................................6 FINANCIAL INTENTIONS .................................................................................................7 THE EFFECT ON AMERICA .............................................................................................8 ECONOMIC CORRIDORS .................................................................................................9 FUNDING .......................................................................................................................... 11 APPENDIX A: PROGRAM LEADERSHIP ....................................................................... 16 APPENDIX B: ASSOCIATED ENTITIES ......................................................................... 18 APPENDIX C: PARTICIPATING NATIONS.................................................................... 21 APPENDIX D: PROJECTS ...............................................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • 1-Kongres 2014 ABSTRAKT CB.Pdf
    ЗБОРНИК АБСТРАКАТА Први српски конгрес о путевима , 5-6 јун 2014. BOOK OF ABSTRACTS First Serbian Road Congress , June 5-6 2014. Издавач Српско друштво за путеве " VIA-VITA" Кумодрашка 257, 11000 Београд За издавача Душан Богојевић Уредници проф. др Милан Вујанић Биљана Вуксановић, дипл. инж. грађ. Графички дизајн: Омнибус, Београд Штампа: Дедрапласт, Београд Тираж: 300 ISBN: 978-86-88541-01-5 ЗБОРНИК АБСТРАКАТА Први српски конгрес о путевима , 5-6 јун 2014. BOOK OF ABSTRACTS First Serbian Road Congress , June 5-6 2014. Српско друштво за путеве " VIA-VITA" Београд , 2014. САДРЖАЈ Уводна реч Милан Вујанић... 15 Поздравна реч Биљана Вуксановић... 17 ТЕМА 1... Студије и пројектовање / Studies and Design SOIL TREATMENT WITH LIME FOR FINE CLAYEY SOILS: AN ECONOMICAL SOLUTION FOR SUBGRADE, SUB BASE, BASE & CAPPING LAYERS Christophe Denayer, Gabriele Tebaldi... 21 MAGISTRALNI PUT M18 (E 762) FOČA (BIH) - ŠĆEPAN POLJE (CG) KAO DIO GLAVNE PUTNE MREŽE REGIONA - PROJEKTOVANJE I MODERNIZACIJA Predrag Šarkinović, Elvir Alić, Mario Jerčinović... 21 ODABIR OPTIMALNOG SISTEMA NAPLATE PUTARINE ZA MREŽU AUTOPUTEVA REPUBLIKE SRPSKE "CASE STUDY" Draženko Glavić... 22 PREGLED DIMENZIONIRANJA SAVITLJIVIH KOLNIČKIH KONSTRUKCIJA U EUROPSKOJ I NAŠOJ REGULATIVI Boris Čutura, Ivan Lovrić, Branko Mazić... 23 EKSPERIMENTALNO ISPITIVANJE STABILNOSTI POTPORNIH ZIDOVA OD PREFABRIKOVANIH BETONBLOK ELEMENATA Nebojša Davidović, Zoran Bonić, Verka Prolović, Nikola Romić, Nikola Davidović... 24 PROJEKAT AUTOPUTA E-80 NIŠ – DIMITROVGRAD Milosav Rajković... 24 HIJERARHIJSKA KONTROLA PRISTUPA NA DRŽAVNE PUTEVE - OBAVEZA PLANERA/PROJEKTANTA Dušan Savković... 26 EVALUATION OF TRAVEL TIME DATA COLLECTION AND TRAFFIC MONITORING TECHNOLOGIES FOR A WIDE-AREA NETWORK Reza Omrani, Pedram Izadpanah, Goran Nikolic, Alireza Hadayeghi... 26 ИЗВОЂЕЊЕ ТУНЕЛА ''БАНЦАРЕВО'' Слободан Савић..
    [Show full text]
  • Public-Private Partnerships Financed by the European Investment Bank from 1990 to 2020
    EUROPEAN PPP EXPERTISE CENTRE Public-private partnerships financed by the European Investment Bank from 1990 to 2020 March 2021 Public-private partnerships financed by the European Investment Bank from 1990 to 2020 March 2021 Terms of Use of this Publication The European PPP Expertise Centre (EPEC) is part of the Advisory Services of the European Investment Bank (EIB). It is an initiative that also involves the European Commission, Member States of the EU, Candidate States and certain other States. For more information about EPEC and its membership, please visit www.eib.org/epec. The findings, analyses, interpretations and conclusions contained in this publication do not necessarily reflect the views or policies of the EIB or any other EPEC member. No EPEC member, including the EIB, accepts any responsibility for the accuracy of the information contained in this publication or any liability for any consequences arising from its use. Reliance on the information provided in this publication is therefore at the sole risk of the user. EPEC authorises the users of this publication to access, download, display, reproduce and print its content subject to the following conditions: (i) when using the content of this document, users should attribute the source of the material and (ii) under no circumstances should there be commercial exploitation of this document or its content. Purpose and Methodology This report is part of EPEC’s work on monitoring developments in the public-private partnership (PPP) market. It is intended to provide an overview of the role played by the EIB in financing PPP projects inside and outside of Europe since 1990.
    [Show full text]
  • 3Rd Workplan
    Baltic Adriatic Third Work Plan of the European Coordinator Kurt Bodewig APRIL 2018 Mobility and Transport APRIL 2018 This report represents the opinion of the European Coordinator and does not prejudice the official position of the European Commission. The European Commission does not guarantee the accuracy of the data included in this report. Neither the Commission nor any person acting on the Commission’s behalf may be held responsible for any potential use which may be made of the information contained herein. Publication date: April 2018 Reference source of analysis: 2015-2017 Baltic-Adriatic Corridor Study, Final Report, January 2018 Contents 1. Towards the third Baltic-Adriatic corridor work plan .................................... 5 2. Characteristics of the Baltic-Adriatic Corridor ............................................... 8 2.1. From the Polish to the Adriatic ports – corridor alignment ........................... 8 2.2. Compliance with the technical infrastructure parameters of the TEN-T guidelines in 2017 ........................................................................ 9 2.3. Progress of corridor development ............................................................17 3. Transport market analysis .......................................................................... 19 3.1. Results of the multimodal transport market study .....................................19 3.2. Capacity issues on the rail and road networks ..........................................23 4. Planned projects along the Baltic-Adriatic Corridor
    [Show full text]
  • ODLUKU O Izboru Pravnih Lica Za Poslove Iz Programa Mera Zdravstvene Zaštite Životinja Za Period 2014–2016
    Na osnovu člana 53. stav 5. Zakona o veterinarstvu („Službeni glasnik RS”, br. 91/05, 30/10, 93/12), Ministar poljoprivrede, šumarstva i vodoprivrede donosi ODLUKU o izboru pravnih lica za poslove iz Programa mera zdravstvene zaštite životinja za period 2014–2016. godine Poslovi iz Programa mera za period 2014–2016. godine, koji su utvrđeni kao poslovi od javnog interesa, ustupaju se sledećim pravnim licima: Grad Beograd 1. VS „Tika Vet” Mladenovac Rabrovac, Jagnjilo, Markovac Amerić, Beljevac, Velika Ivanča, Velika Krsna, Vlaška, Granice, Dubona, Kovačevac, Koraćica, Mala Vrbica, 2. VS „Mladenovac” Mladenovac Međulužje, Mladenovac, selo Mladenovac, Pružatovac, Rajkovac, Senaja, Crkvine, Šepšin Baljevac, Brović, Vukićevica, Grabovac, Draževac, VS „Aćimović– 3. Obrenovac Zabrežje, Jasenak, Konatica, LJubinić, Mislođin, Piroman, Obrenovac” Poljane, Stubline, Trstenica Belo Polje, Brgulice, Veliko Polje, Dren, Zvečka, Krtinska, 4. VS „Dr Kostić” Obrenovac Orašac, Ratari, Rvati, Skela, Ušće, Urovci 5. VS „Simbiosis Vet” Obrenovac Obrenovac, Barič, Mala Moštanica 6. VS „Nutrivet” Grocka Begaljica, Pudarci, Dražanj Umčari, Boleč, Brestovik, Vinča, Grocka, Živkovac, 7. VS „Grocka” Grocka Zaklopača, Kaluđerica, Kamendo, Leštane, Pudraci, Ritopek Baroševac, Prkosava, Rudovci, Strmovo, Mali Crljeni, 8. VS „Arnika Veterina” Lazarevac Kruševica, Trbušnica, Bistrica, Dren Vrbovno, Stepojevac, Leskovac, Sokolovo, Cvetovac, 9. VS „Artmedika Vet” Lazarevac Vreoci, Veliki Crljeni, Junkovac, Arapovac, Sakulja Lazarevac, Šopić, Barzilovica, Brajkovac, Čibutkovica, VS „Alfa Vet CO 10. Lazarevac Dudovica, Lukovica, Medoševac, Mirosaljci, Zeoke, Petka, 2007” Stubica, Šušnjar, Županjac, Burovo 11. VS „Ardis Vet” Sopot Slatina, Dučina, Rogača, Sibnica, Drlupa 12. VS „Uniprim Vet” Barajevo Arnajevo, Rožanci, Beljina, Boždarevac, Manić 13. VS „Vidra-Vet” Surčin Bečmen, Petrovčić, Novi Beograd, Bežanija Surčin Surčin, Dobanovci, Boljevci, Jakovo, Progar 14.
    [Show full text]
  • Documents.Worldbank.Org
    46730 THE WORLD BANK GROUP WASHINGTON, D.C. TP-23 TRANSPORT PAPERS NOVEMBER 2008 Public Disclosure Authorized Road User Charges: Current Practice and Perspectives in Central and Eastern Europe Cesar Queiroz, Barbara Rdzanowska, Robert Garbarczyk and Michel Audige Public Disclosure Authorized Public Disclosure Authorized Public Disclosure Authorized TRANSPORT SECTOR BOARD ROAD USER CHARGES: CURRENT PRACTICE AND PERSPECTIVES IN CENTRAL AND EASTERN EUROPE Cesar Queiroz, Barbara Rdzanowska, Robert Garbarczyk and Michel Audige THE WORLD BANK WASHINGTON, D.C. © 2008 The International Bank for Reconstruction and Development / The World Bank 1818 H Street NW Washington, DC 20433 Telephone 202-473-1000 Internet: www.worldbank.org This volume is a product of the staff of The World Bank. The findings, interpretations, and conclusions expressed in this volume do not necessarily reflect the views of the Executive Directors of The World Bank or the governments they represent. The World Bank does not guarantee the accuracy of the data included in this work. The boundaries, colors, denominations, and other information shown on any map in this work do not imply any judgment on the part of The World Bank concerning the legal status of any territory or the endorsement or acceptance of such boundaries. Rights and Permissions The material in this publication is copyrighted. Copying and/or transmitting portions or all of this work without permission may be a violation of applicable law. The International Bank for Reconstruction and Development / The World Bank encourages dissemination of its work and will normally grant permission to reproduce portions of the work promptly. For permission to photocopy or reprint any part of this work, please send a request with complete information to the Copyright Clearance Center Inc., 222 Rosewood Drive, Danvers, MA 01923, USA; telephone: 978-750-8400; fax: 978-750-4470; Internet: www.copyright.com.
    [Show full text]
  • Program Za Godinu JLS Šifra JLS Odgovorno Lice Telefon Mail 2021
    Program za godinu JLS Šifra JLS Odgovorno lice Telefon Mail 2021 SVRLJIG 71064 Krstić Vlada 064/8509939 [email protected] JMBG/MBR Broj javnog Broj posedovnog lista Broj katastarske Površina faktičko Poljoprivredni objekat Osnov raspolaganja fizičkog/pravnog lica Katastarska opština Kultura Površina - RGZ Potes Površina državni udeo Da li je deo parcele PP id Kultura faktičko stanje Zona zaštite Suvlasnik Napomena nadmetanja ili lista nepokretnosti parcele stanje u državnoj svojini (ha) zakupca JASTREB KAMEN- Zakup 1 Beloinje 562 2929 NjIVA 6. KLASE 0.31750 0.10580 0.10580 НЕ NjIVA 6. KLASE DUNJE JASTREB KAMEN- Zakup 1 Beloinje 562 2929 NjIVA 7. KLASE 0.09740 0.03250 0.03250 НЕ NjIVA 7. KLASE DUNJE UKUPNO ZA JN 1: 0.13830 Zakup 2 Beloinje 909 3151 LIVADA 6. KLASE 0.11170 PODEVALA-PODEVALA 0.11170 0.11170 НЕ LIVADA 6. KLASE UKUPNO ZA JN 2: 0.11170 Zakup 3 Beloinje 909 1374 NjIVA 2. KLASE 0.00310 LJUTAČA-LJUTAČA 0.00310 0.00310 НЕ NjIVA 2. KLASE UKUPNO ZA JN 3: 0.00310 Zakup 4 Beloinje 909 918 NjIVA 3. KLASE 0.01610 MEKE LIVADE-MIKA LIV 0.01610 0.01610 НЕ NjIVA 3. KLASE Zakup 4 Beloinje 909 919 LIVADA 2. KLASE 0.04590 MEKE LIVADE-MEKE LIV 0.04590 0.04590 НЕ NjIVA UKUPNO ZA JN 4: 0.06200 Zakup 5 Beloinje 909 1014 LIVADA 2. KLASE 0.11460 M LIVADE-M LIVADE 0.11460 0.07120 ДА 2 LIVADA UKUPNO ZA JN 5: 0.07120 UKUPNO ZA Beloinje: 0.38630 SLADUNICA- Zakup 6 Burdimo 1138 7 PAŠNjAK 3.
    [Show full text]
  • Подкласс Exogenia Collin, 1912
    Research Article ISSN 2336-9744 (online) | ISSN 2337-0173 (print) The journal is available on line at www.ecol-mne.com Contribution to the knowledge of distribution of Colubrid snakes in Serbia LJILJANA TOMOVIĆ1,2,4*, ALEKSANDAR UROŠEVIĆ2,4, RASTKO AJTIĆ3,4, IMRE KRIZMANIĆ1, ALEKSANDAR SIMOVIĆ4, NENAD LABUS5, DANKO JOVIĆ6, MILIVOJ KRSTIĆ4, SONJA ĐORĐEVIĆ1,4, MARKO ANĐELKOVIĆ2,4, ANA GOLUBOVIĆ1,4 & GEORG DŽUKIĆ2 1 University of Belgrade, Faculty of Biology, Studentski trg 16, 11000 Belgrade, Serbia 2 University of Belgrade, Institute for Biological Research “Siniša Stanković”, Bulevar despota Stefana 142, 11000 Belgrade, Serbia 3 Institute for Nature Conservation of Serbia, Dr Ivana Ribara 91, 11070 Belgrade, Serbia 4 Serbian Herpetological Society “Milutin Radovanović”, Bulevar despota Stefana 142, 11000 Belgrade, Serbia 5 University of Priština, Faculty of Science and Mathematics, Biology Department, Lole Ribara 29, 38220 Kosovska Mitrovica, Serbia 6 Institute for Nature Conservation of Serbia, Vožda Karađorđa 14, 18000 Niš, Serbia *Corresponding author: E-mail: [email protected] Received 28 March 2015 │ Accepted 31 March 2015 │ Published online 6 April 2015. Abstract Detailed distribution pattern of colubrid snakes in Serbia is still inadequately described, despite the long historical study. In this paper, we provide accurate distribution of seven species, with previously published and newly accumulated faunistic records compiled. Comparative analysis of faunas among all Balkan countries showed that Serbian colubrid fauna is among the most distinct (together with faunas of Slovenia and Romania), due to small number of species. Zoogeographic analysis showed high chorotype diversity of Serbian colubrids: seven species belong to six chorotypes. South-eastern Serbia (Pčinja River valley) is characterized by the presence of all colubrid species inhabiting our country, and deserves the highest conservation status at the national level.
    [Show full text]
  • DLA Piper. Details of the Member Entities of DLA Piper Are Available on the Website
    EUROPEAN PPP REPORT 2009 ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS This Report has been published with particular thanks to: The EPEC Executive and in particular, Livia Dumitrescu, Goetz von Thadden, Mathieu Nemoz and Laura Potten. Those EPEC Members and EIB staff who commented on the country reports. Each of the contributors of a ‘View from a Country’. Line Markert and Mikkel Fritsch from Horten for assistance with the report on Denmark. Andrei Aganimov from Borenius & Kemppinen for assistance with the report on Finland. Maura Capoulas Santos and Alberto Galhardo Simões from Miranda Correia Amendoeira & Associados for assistance with the report on Portugal. Gustaf Reuterskiöld and Malin Cope from DLA Nordic for assistance with the report on Sweden. Infra-News for assistance generally and in particular with the project lists. All those members of DLA Piper who assisted with the preparation of the country reports and finally, Rosemary Bointon, Editor of the Report. Production of Report and Copyright This European PPP Report 2009 ( “Report”) has been produced and edited by DLA Piper*. DLA Piper acknowledges the contribution of the European PPP Expertise Centre (EPEC)** in the preparation of the Report. DLA Piper retains editorial responsibility for the Report. In contributing to the Report neither the European Investment Bank, EPEC, EPEC’s Members, nor any Contributor*** indicates or implies agreement with, or endorsement of, any part of the Report. This document is the copyright of DLA Piper and the Contributors. This document is confidential and personal to you. It is provided to you on the understanding that it is not to be re-used in any way, duplicated or distributed without the written consent of DLA Piper or the relevant Contributor.
    [Show full text]
  • Life in Transition Survey II
    Life in Transition Survey II DRAFT Technical Report June 2011 Legal notice © 2011 Ipsos MORI – all rights reserved. The contents of this report constitute the sole and exclusive property of Ipsos MORI. Ipsos MORI retains all right, title and interest, including without limitation copyright, in or to any Ipsos MORI trademarks, technologies, methodologies, products, analyses, software and know-how included or arising out of this report or used in connection with the preparation of this report. No license under any copyright is hereby granted or implied. The contents of this report are of a commercially sensitive and confidential nature and intended solely for the review and consideration of the person or entity to which it is addressed. No other use is permitted and the addressee undertakes not to disclose all or part of this report to any third party (including but not limited, where applicable, pursuant to the Freedom of Information Act 2000) without the prior written consent of the Company Secretary of Ipsos MORI. Contents 1. Introduction ................................................................................ 2 1.1. Background and history ....................................................................... 2 1.2. Structure of this report ......................................................................... 2 1.3. Key specifications ................................................................................ 3 2. Questionnaire development and piloting ................................. 5 2.1 Introduction ..........................................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • Serbia 2029 Prospectus
    REPUBLIC OF SERBIA (represented by the Government of the Republic of Serbia, acting by and through the Ministry of Finance) €1,000,000,000 1.500 per cent. Notes due 2029 Issue price: 98.909 per cent. The €1,000,000,000 1.500 per cent. Notes due 2029 (the “Notes”) to be issued by the Republic of Serbia, represented by the Government of the Republic of Serbia acting by and through the Ministry of Finance (the “Issuer”) will mature on 26 June 2029 and, unless previously purchased and cancelled, will be redeemed at their principal amount on that date. The Notes will bear interest at a rate of 1.500 per cent. per annum. Interest will accrue on the outstanding principal amount of the Notes from and including 26 June 2019 and will be payable annually in arrear on 26 June in each year, commencing on 26 June 2020. All payments of principal and interest in respect of the Notes shall be made free and clear of, and without withholding or deduction for, any taxes, duties, assessments or governmental charges of whatever nature imposed, levied, collected, withheld or assessed by or within the Republic of Serbia (the “Republic of Serbia” or “Serbia”) or any political subdivision or any authority thereof or therein having power to tax, unless such withholding or deduction is required by law. In that event, the Issuer shall pay such additional amounts as will result in the receipt by the Noteholders of such amounts as would have been received by them if no such withholding or deduction had been required, subject to certain exceptions set out in the Conditions (as defined below).
    [Show full text]
  • ROADS of SERBIA” ZORAN DROBNJAK “When You Want to Develop an Area, Equip It with Good Roads”, Prof
    INTRODUCTION ACTING DIRECTOR OF THE PE “ROADS OF SERBIA” ZORAN DROBNJAK “When you want to develop an area, equip it with good roads”, prof. dr Milan Vujanić says and I entirely agree with this. Interdependence of industry and roads is quite evident because roads, in addition to their main function concerning the transport of people and goods, also generate growth and development of all places through which the road network passes as well as all other which are indirectly connected with motorways and other important routes in the Republic of Serbia. Thus it is the main dedication of the PE “Roads of Serbia” to achieve what is expected from us – to successfully finish all investments and provide the same level of quality of all the roads in Serbia with constant increase of the level of traffic safety, with cordial assistance of the Government of the Republic of Serbia and the Ministry of Construction, Transport and Infrastructure. This is an imperative of our work, not only because of the expectations in front of us regarding the accession to the European Union, but also because good roads are one of the pillars of every serious and modern country. Road towards the achievement of big results starts with the devotion of individuals, each one of us. Owing to an exceptional devotion of the employees in the PE “Roads of Serbia”, achievement of the adopted plans is possible, regardless of the difficulties and not always favourable work conditions which the time sets upon us. Daily perseverance, devotion and openness of our employees to new knowledge and changes is obvious.
    [Show full text]