DOCSLIB.ORG

Table of Contents Item Transcript

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text

Load more

DIGITAL COLLECTIONS ITEM TRANSCRIPT Yuriy Dubovitsky. Full, unedited interview, 2009 ID MI002.interview PERMALINK http://n2t.net/ark:/86084/b47z63 ITEM TYPE VIDEO ORIGINAL LANGUAGE RUSSIAN TABLE OF CONTENTS ITEM TRANSCRIPT ENGLISH TRANSLATION 2 CITATION & RIGHTS 11 2021 © BLAVATNIK ARCHIVE FOUNDATION PG 1/11 BLAVATNIKARCHIVE.ORG DIGITAL COLLECTIONS ITEM TRANSCRIPT Yuriy Dubovitsky. Full, unedited interview, 2009 ID MI002.interview PERMALINK http://n2t.net/ark:/86084/b47z63 ITEM TYPE VIDEO ORIGINAL LANGUAGE RUSSIAN TRANSCRIPT ENGLISH TRANSLATION —Today is April 27th, 2009. We are in Detroit, meeting a veteran of the Great Patriotic War. Please introduce yourself and tell us about your childhood, your schooling, and the family you grew up in. How did you come to serve in the Red Army, and what was the war like for you? My name is Yuri Dubovitsky and I was born in Pryluky, Chernihiv Region in 1923. My parents, grandparents, and I lived there until 1929 when we moved to Simferopol in the Crimean ASSR, as it was called before the war. In 1930 I started first grade at Simferopol High School No.14. On June 18th, 1941 I passed the state exams and finished tenth grade. As you know, the Great Patriotic War began on June 22nd. All of my plans for continuing my education were indefinitely put on hold. I dreamed of studying at the Dzerzhinsky Leningrad Technical Academy, but the war cancelled all of our plans. When the war began my father, a Party member, joined a Communist battalion and stayed in Simferopol, if you can imagine. He was not allowed to leave. My mother and I were evacuated to Kharkiv and could not return. We thought that the war would be over quickly and that we would soon return home to Simferopol. My cousin and her husband found space for us in a convoy of trucks that was heading east. We reached Tambov and were supposed to continue on to Toshkent. When we arrived in Toshkent in November 1941 we received one telegram from my father; he wrote to our friends, asking if we had reached Toshkent safely. We could not register in Tashkent because the evacuee registration window had already closed by the time we arrived, so we had to move to Fergana in the Uzbek Republic. We did not spend a long time in Fergana because in February 1942 many of my classmates from School No.14, who had also evacuated to Fergana, were drafted into the army since they were born in the first half of 1922. I was not drafted since I was born in November, but I decided to volunteer for the front at the draft office. I was sent to the Toshkent Mortar and Machinegun School. I trained there for six months and then took my military and political tests during the month of July. One night in August we received an order from Stalin to send all 3,500 trainees from our school to the front. We had already passed our exams and were supposed to become either junior lieutenants or lieutenants, but we were not assigned these ranks. Overnight we were all issued uniforms and sent to the station of Akhtuba in the Stalingrad Region. This is how I came to the Stalingrad Front. 2021 © BLAVATNIK ARCHIVE FOUNDATION PG 2/11 BLAVATNIKARCHIVE.ORG DIGITAL COLLECTIONS ITEM TRANSCRIPT Yuriy Dubovitsky. Full, unedited interview, 2009 ID MI002.interview PERMALINK http://n2t.net/ark:/86084/b47z63 ITEM TYPE VIDEO ORIGINAL LANGUAGE RUSSIAN I was trained as a machine gunner and was first assigned to a machinegun company. We had two companies, a machinegun one and a mortar one. I was initially in the machinegun company, but was retrained on location and learned to use an anti-tank rifle. It was only effective against light tanks and could pierce the armor on the heavier ones. The anti-tank rifles could not pierce the German armor. I was assigned to an anti-tank unit and spent August-January there. We were stationed on the approaches to Stalingrad and stopped the Germans, Hungarians, and Romanians from taking the city. We protected the Stalingrad Tractor Factory for several months. In December Marshall of the Soviet Union Konstantin Rokossovsky ordered us to send the Germans, Romanians, and Hungarians a New Year’s greeting. It was an unforgettable sight. We fired all our weapons into the air, not at the German positions, and the sky lit up as if it were daytime. Once we pushed the Germans away from the factory near the station of Beketovka, it was our regiment’s turn to go on the offensive. We traded our anti-tank rifles for submachine guns and were ordered forward, “For the Motherland and for Stalin” as we used to say. We advanced on a German lodgement. Our advance was halted by an artillery battery which was set up in a building and fired onto the street, preventing our infantry and light artillery from breaking through. We were ordered to destroy this German fortification. We burst into the house with our submachineguns and grenades and began figuring out from where enemy was shooting at us… It was dark and he threw two grenades. One blew up behind us and the other exploded on the staircase landing. My right arm was wounded by shrapnel from one of the grenades. A comrade helped me descend the staircase and reach our nurse, who was hidden behind the building to protect her from stray bullets and shells. She bandaged my hand. Then our commander came up to me and said “Yuri, you will now carry two submachineguns, a Soviet and a German one and go down to the river. If you manage to cross the Volga, you will be safe. Tracers were constantly flying above the Volga and the surrounding hills. I bid him goodbye as he carefully helped me reach the riverbank… It was January 1943 and the cold was intense, down to -50 Celsius. I was dressed in a trench coat, a cotton jacket, and boots. My feet were frostbitten and I barely managed to cross to the other bank. However, I did not walk on the ice, but rather on frozen bodies. There were dead bodies… of our troops, Hungarians, Romanians, and Germans, with carts of wounded men driving over them. It was an awful sight. Even though my feet were frostbitten I managed to cross the frozen Volga. I reached an armored brigade and they took me to a first aid station which was set up in a trailer and manned by a male nurse. He asked me what had happened to my hand and I explained as well as I could. He cut open my trench coat and my cotton jacket before injecting me with Bohomolets Serum, which saved my hand from amputation. He was older than me and said “Well sonny, now get to the field hospital if you can.” 2021 © BLAVATNIK ARCHIVE FOUNDATION PG 3/11 BLAVATNIKARCHIVE.ORG DIGITAL COLLECTIONS ITEM TRANSCRIPT Yuriy Dubovitsky. Full, unedited interview, 2009 ID MI002.interview PERMALINK http://n2t.net/ark:/86084/b47z63 ITEM TYPE VIDEO ORIGINAL LANGUAGE RUSSIAN I set out on unfamiliar snow-covered roads, but nonetheless managed to find the field hospital. The hospital was mostly for soldiers who had been hit in the leg or the abdomen. It was a grizzly sight and it is difficult to think about it even now. I managed to convince a sleigh driver who shipped coal to and from the station to help me board a medical train bound for Saratov. I said to him “Brother, please help me get to the station.” He took a liking to me and even helped lift me into the train. Soon the train car was loaded with other wounded men and I was registered as one of them and was issued a ration card. It took us two or three days to reach Saratov, where we were housed in the Pioneer Palace. There was a sort of… hospital there. I had to share a bed with another soldier because there were so many wounded men coming in, mostly from the Stalingrad Front. —You faced different directions on the bed. Yes, you are correct. I was to have surgery, but then the Germans launched an air raid on Saratov and the surgery was cancelled. I was in poor shape and began developing a high fever. The doctors decided to send me and other soldiers who needed surgery to the town of Verkhnyaya Salda in the Sverdlovsk Region. We were brought there and assigned to Hospital 1845, I even remember its number. It was a Moscow-based hospital, but they did not have a neurosurgeon. I had to have surgery on my hand where the nerves in my fingers ran very close to the many pieces of shrapnel embedded in my wrist. Two other wounded soldiers and I were sent to Tomsk by airplane. Our hospital had found a neurosurgeon there by the name of Professor Markuze. I still remember his name. The surgery took three and a half hours. I slept for seven days straight because the Novocain they gave me for the pain put me under. I gradually started to come to and when my wound healed up a bit I decided to find my mother. I traveled from Saratov to Novosibirsk in order to catch a train to Central Asia. I thought that I would find her in Toshkent or Fergana. I began asking the station staff in Novosibirsk if they had seen any evacuees from Simferopol. —In Novosibirsk? Yes. I was there in order to catch a train to Toshkent.
Recommended publications
  • Modern Scientific Research and Their Practical Application

    Modern Scientific Research and Their Practical Application

    ISSN 2227-6920 Research Bulletin SWorld Modern scientific research and their practical application Published by: Kupriyenko SV on Project SWorld With the support of: Odessa National Maritime University Ukrainian National Academy of Railway Transport Institute for Entrepreneurship and morehozyaystva Volume J11313 May 2013 SWorld /Scientific World/ - is a modern on-line project, acting in the name of science to achieve the high goal “international integration of research” (conferences, workshops, electronic journals, publishing support for academics) Downloaded from SWorld. Terms of Use http://www.sworld.com.ua/index.php/ru/e-journal/about-journal/terms-of-use Please use the following format to cite material from this book (italics indicate the fields to change to your data): Author(s), 'Title of Paper," in Modern scientific research and their practical application, edited by Alexandr G. Shibaev, Alexandra D. Markova.Vol.J11313 (Kupriyenko SV, Odessa, 2013) – URL: http://www.sworld.com.ua/e-journal/J11313.pdf (date:...) - Article CID Number. This volume contains research papers of scientists in the field of Economy. Editorial board: Alexandr G. Shibaev – Doctor of Technical Sciences, Prof. Alexandr V. Yatsenko – associate professor, rector of the Institute for Entrepreneurship and morehozyaystva Sergiy M. Goncharuk – Doctor of Technical Sciences, prof., Member of the Russian Academy of Transport and the International Informatization Academy, Honored Worker of Transport of Russia Denis V. Lomotko – Doctor of Technical Sciences, Vice-Rector of the Ukrainian State Academy of Railway Transport, Corr. Transport Academy of Ukraine Inna A. Lapkina – Doctor of Economic Sciences, Professor. Sergiy I. Rylov – Ph.D. in Economics, Professor. Julia L. Kantarovich – Ph.D.
  • HARVARD UKRAINIAN STUDIES EDITOR Lubomyr Hajda, Harvard University

    HARVARD UKRAINIAN STUDIES EDITOR Lubomyr Hajda, Harvard University

    HARVARD UKRAINIAN STUDIES EDITOR Lubomyr Hajda, Harvard University EDITORIAL BOARD Michael S. Flier, George G. Grabowicz, Edward L. Keenan, and Roman Szporluk, Harvard University; Frank E. Sysyn, University of Alberta FOUNDING EDITORS Omeljan Pritsak and Ihor Sevcenko, Harvard University BOOK REVIEW EDITOR Larry Wolff EDITORIAL ASSISTANT Daría Yurchuk DIRECTOR OF PUBLICATIONS Robert A. DeLossa ADVISORY BOARD Zvi Ankori, Tel Aviv University—John A. Armstrong, University of Wisconsin—Yaroslav Bilinsky, University of Delaware—Bohdan R. Bociurkiw, Carleton University, Ottawa—Axinia Djurova, University of Sofia—Olexa Horbatsch, University of Frankfurt—Halil inalcık, University of Chi- cago—Jaroslav D. Isajevych, Institute of Ukrainian Studies, Academy of Sciences of Ukraine, L'viv— Edward Kasinec, New York Public Library—Magdalena László-Kujiuk, University of Bucharest— Walter Leitsch, University of Vienna—L. R. Lewitter, Cambridge University—G. Luciani, University of Bordeaux—George S. N. Luckyj, University of Toronto—M. Łesiów, Marie Curie-Sktodowska University, Lublin—Paul R. Magocsi, University of Toronto—Dimitri Obolensky, Oxford Univer- sity—RiccardoPicchio, Yale University—MarcRaeff, Columbia University—HansRothe, University of Bonn—Bohdan Rubchak, University of Illinois at Chicago Circle—Władysław A. Serczyk, University of Warsaw at Białystok—George Y. Shevelov, Columbia University—Günther Stökl, University of Cologne—A. de Vincenz, University of Göttingen—Vaclav Żidlicky, Charles Univer- sity, Prague. COMMITTEE ON UKRAINIAN STUDIES, Harvard University Stanisław Barańczak Patricia Chaput Timothy Colton Michael S. Flier George G. Grabowicz Edward L. Keenan Jeffrey D. Sachs Roman Szporluk (Chairman) Subscription rates per volume (two double issues) are $28.00 U.S. in the United States and Canada, $32.00 in other countries. The price of one double issue is $ 18.00 ($20.00 overseas).
  • Local Networks and Socio-Political Transformations in Ukraine Honorata Mazepus , Antoaneta Dimi

    Local Networks and Socio-Political Transformations in Ukraine Honorata Mazepus , Antoaneta Dimi

    When Business and Politics Mix: Local Networks and Socio-Political Transformations in Ukraine Honorata Mazepusa*, Antoaneta Dimitrovaa, Matthew Frearb, Dimiter Toshkovc, and Nina Onopriychukd a Institute of Security and Global Affairs, Leiden University, Turfmarkt 99, 2511 DP, The Hague; b Institute for History, Leiden University, P.N. van Eyckhof 2, 2311 BV Leiden; c Institute of Public Administration, Leiden University, Turfmarkt 99, 2511 DP, The Hague; d Political Science and Public Administration, Vrije Universiteit Amsterdam. De Boelelaan 1105, 1081HV Amsterdam; The Netherlands *Corresponding author. Email: [email protected] This paper investigates whether and how patronage networks affect the progress of socio-political reforms at the local level in Ukraine. It contributes in three ways to the study of networks and transitions of socio-political orders: first, it provides rich empirical study using primary (interview) and secondary data; second, it focuses on the local rather than national level and analyses three understudied cases of networks (Kharkiv, Mykolaiv, and Ivano-Frankivsk); third, theoretically it relates the studies of patronage networks in post-communist setting to a broader framework of limited access orders. Our findings show that although multiplicity of networks might be a necessary condition for the opening of access to political and economic resources, it is not a sufficient one. Also, the presence of multiple networks is not necessary for high level of citizen satisfaction with public goods provision—a single dominant network might achieve a relatively high level of citizen satisfaction too. Keywords: local networks; Ukraine; patronage; limited access orders; satisfaction with public goods provision 1 1. Introduction Social networks are ubiquitous in social, economic, and political life (Collier 2016, 10).
  • Uzbek: War, Friendship of the Peoples, and the Creation of Soviet Uzbekistan, 1941-1945

    Uzbek: War, Friendship of the Peoples, and the Creation of Soviet Uzbekistan, 1941-1945

    Making Ivan-Uzbek: War, Friendship of the Peoples, and the Creation of Soviet Uzbekistan, 1941-1945 By Charles David Shaw A dissertation submitted in partial satisfaction of the requirements for the degree of Doctor of Philosophy in History in the Graduate Division of the University of California, Berkeley Committee in charge: Professor Yuri Slezkine, Chair Professor Victoria Frede-Montemayor Professor Victoria E. Bonnell Summer 2015 Abstract Making Ivan-Uzbek: War, Friendship of the Peoples, and the Creation of Soviet Uzbekistan, 1941-1945 by Charles David Shaw Doctor of Philosophy in History University of California, Berkeley Professor Yuri Slezkine, Chair This dissertation addresses the impact of World War II on Uzbek society and contends that the war era should be seen as seen as equally transformative to the tumultuous 1920s and 1930s for Soviet Central Asia. It argues that via the processes of military service, labor mobilization, and the evacuation of Soviet elites and common citizens that Uzbeks joined the broader “Soviet people” or sovetskii narod and overcame the prejudices of being “formerly backward” in Marxist ideology. The dissertation argues that the army was a flexible institution that both catered to national cultural (including Islamic ritual) and linguistic difference but also offered avenues for assimilation to become Ivan-Uzbeks, part of a Russian-speaking, pan-Soviet community of victors. Yet as the war wound down the reemergence of tradition and violence against women made clear the limits of this integration. The dissertation contends that the war shaped the contours of Central Asian society that endured through 1991 and created the basis for thinking of the “Soviet people” as a nation in the 1950s and 1960s.
  • Glantz Vol III Book 1 LATEST.Indd

    Glantz Vol III Book 1 LATEST.Indd

    © University Press of Kansas. All rights reserved. Reproduction and distribution prohibited without permission of the Press. Contents List of Maps, Tables, and Illustrations ix Preface xv Selected Abbreviations xxi Part I. Soviet Strategic Planning 1. Framework for Disaster 3 Frustration 3 The Wehrmacht in November 1942 8 German Field Commanders 11 The Red Army in November 1942 12 Soviet Field Commanders 15 2. Soviet Strategic Planning: The Genesis of Plan Uranus 20 Who Formulated Plan Uranus? The Historical Debate 20 Competing Offensive Concepts 23 Triumph of the “Different Solution,” 1–13 October 31 Plan Uranus Takes Shape, 14–31 October 38 Final Preparations, 1–18 November 41 Reflections 50 3. Gathering the Troops: Soviet Order of Battle and the Uranus Plan 55 Regrouping Forces for the Counteroffensive 55 Soviet Order of Battle 58 The Uranus Plan 79 Front and Army Plans 93 4. The Balance of Opposing Forces on 18 November 127 Soviet Forces 127 Axis Forces and Defenses 131 The Correlation of Opposing Forces 165 Part II. The Uranus Counteroffensive 5. The Penetration Battle, 19–20 November 185 Preliminaries 185 © University Press of Kansas. All rights reserved. Reproduction and distribution prohibited without permission of the Press. viii Contents The Southwestern and Don Fronts’ Offensive, 19–20 November 192 The Stalingrad Front’s Offensive, 20 November 248 6. The Encirclement Closes, 21–23 November 268 German Dilemmas on 21 November 268 The Southwestern and Don Fronts’ Offensive, 21 November 271 The Stalingrad Front’s Offensive, 21 November 288 The Southwestern and Don Fronts’ Offensive, 22 November 299 The Stalingrad Front’s Offensive, 22 November 323 The Southwestern and Don Fronts’ Offensive, 23 November 337 The Stalingrad Front’s Offensive, 23 November 358 The Situation Late on 23 November 369 German Dilemmas on 23 November 371 7.
  • Winter Storm Special Rules WINTER STORM Special Rules Draft Version 4.10

    Winter Storm Special Rules WINTER STORM Special Rules Draft Version 4.10

    Winter Storm Special Rules WINTER STORM Special Rules Draft Version 4.10 1.0 GAME-SPECIFIC CONDITIONS units are placed in these hexes at start Soviet 1.1 ULTIMATE SUPPLY SOURCES: troops are presumed to be occupying the same Once a week, in the Strategic supply phase, hex. They have been placed in adjacent hexes for players will roll to determine how much supply is convenience’s sake. brought forward over their friendly rail lines from 1.2 RAIL CAPACITY: the ultimate supply source. For the German player The German player may have no more than five the ultimate supply source is any southern or train markers In play at any given time. The eastern mapedge rail hex. The German player will Russian player may have no more than five also. also have the use of the northern mapedge rail Players may have only one railhead marker in play lines which are west of the Don until they are for each friendly rail line. Rail lines will be named closed by Soviet action which occurs off map to to differentiate them from one another. EXAMPLE: the north. The line at entry area 1 running through The “Trans Caucasus Line". Kantemirovka and Millerovo remains open to the 1.21 Off-Map Rail Movement. Off-map Rail German player through turn 28 (Jan. 18). Three communications exist between turns after the Soviet player exits at least five the Rostov Line at Area 12 and the Trans- division sized units or their equivalents off the Caucasus Line at Area 11. Units exiting Area 12 West mapedge and North of the Donets river, at are held off map for one turn and then entered at Area 18 or 17, the effectiveness of the rail line at Area 11, or vice versa.
  • Thinking Beyond Dead Germans by Capt Zachary Schwartz

    Thinking Beyond Dead Germans by Capt Zachary Schwartz

    IDEAS & ISSUES (STRATEGY & POLICY) Thinking Beyond Dead Germans Bias and our warped orientation on the Russian adversary by Capt Zachary Schwartz ecent articles in the Marine Corps Gazette have shed re- >Capt Schwartz is the Weapons Company Commander, 3/7 Mar. He is also a regu- newed light on the influence lar contributor to and co-founder of the Connecting File, an online newsletter for of German Military history, infantry company commanders. Rparticularly the German military of World War II, on the Marine Corps and the Maneuver Warfare Movement. mistakes made by the authors, omit- pragmatically propped up and pro- This influence is undeniable and has ted information that would have been moted the narrative of the nobility and been critical to the development of our embarrassing and placed the blame strength of German arms against the warfighting doctrine; however, a series for fiascos on third parties.”2 You can Communist threat.5 American military of biases are inherent in our embrace of probably go to your unit library right leaders began to accept and study the the German military experience. These now and find well-worn editions of Gen often-slanted accounts of SS and Heer biases deeply effect our understanding Heinz Guderian’s Panzer Leader, Gen officers. This uncomfortable acceptance of World War II Germany’s most hated Friedrich von Mellenthin Panzer Battles, of Nazi commanders continues to this adversary: Russia. To fully understand and the achingly titled Lost Victories day. In 2019, the Department of De- and execute maneuver warfare, we must by Field Marshal Erich Von Manstein.
  • UDC 911.3 Anastasiia Mazurova, Phd Student E-Mail: A.V.Mazurova@Ukr.Net V.N. Karazin Kharkiv National University QUESTIONING

    UDC 911.3 Anastasiia Mazurova, Phd Student E-Mail: [email protected] V.N. Karazin Kharkiv National University QUESTIONING

    2016 Часопис соціально -економічної географії випуск 21(2) UDC 911.3 Anastasiia Mazurova , PhD Student e-mail: [email protected] V.N. Karazin Kharkiv National University QUESTIONING METHOD IN THE HUMAN GEOGRAPHICAL RESEARCH (ON THE EXAMPLE OF THE POLL OF KHARKIV`S RESIDENTS ABOUT CITY ADMINISTRATIVE DISTRICTS) For the city of Kharkiv as the second for population city of Ukraine, determination of a thought of citizen’s about industrial, residential, landscape and recreational zones, social and cultural infrastructure, specialization and accommodation comfort is very important. Through the collection and analysis of such information may determine the main problems plaguing citizen and the most optimal ways to solve them, because usually exactly citizens can see practical and effective methods of problem solving to optimize urban space. The aim of this study was to determine the attitude and awareness of citizens of Kharkiv`s administrative districts on indus- trial, residential, landscape and recreational, cultural infrastructure, specialization by the method of questioning. It was also consid- ered accommodation comfort, the most popular objects of landscape and recreational, cultural spheres. The most comfortable districts for living are Nemyshlyansky, Kievsky and Shevchenkivsky districts. The average level of living comfort is in Moskovsky, Osnovyansky and Slobidsky districts. Uncomfortable districts by residents are Industrial, Novoba- varsky and Kholodnohorsky districts. The detailed analysis of conditions of accommodation of the population in areas with low com- fort and identifications of ways of improvement is required. In general, we note that using the questioning method was identified a number of administrative areas of the city that need developing additional programs to improve their infrastructure and living conditions.
  • Introduction

    Introduction

    Przemyslaw ZURAWSKI vel GRAJEWSKI POLISH - UKRAINIAN RELATIONS 1991-2002 Introduction Poland and Ukraine are the two largest states of Central-Eastern Europe and the nature of their relations by that very fact is a crucial one for the future of and the stability in the region. Being deprived of their independence till 1989 (Poland) or even real statehood till 1991 (Ukraine) the two neighbouring nations have a unique chance to shape their mutual relations as free peoples on an equal level both in interstate and inter individuals relations now. The way in which they deal with that task is the main topic of this paper. The subject in question will be considered in the two main dimensions: political and economic one. To create a clear and valuable image of the Polish-Ukrainian relations in the first decade of the independence of the two countries we shell start with the periodization of the entire epoch and with the list of basic treaties constituting a solid fundament for both political and economic relations between Poland and Ukraine. For the same reason a list of the main meetings and visits of high officials of both countries is included to the text just as an illustration of the intensity of mutual contacts. That is expected to supply the readers with the hard framework of the more detailed considerations presented in the further sub-chapters. The main questions to be answered in this paper are: 1. What is the place of Ukraine in the conceptual papers of Polish government? What are the principles on which the Ukrainian policy of Poland is based on and what are the strategic aims of Poland as regards Ukraine? 2.
  • Red Army Operations in Theory and Practice, 1936-1942

    Red Army Operations in Theory and Practice, 1936-1942

    University of Calgary PRISM: University of Calgary's Digital Repository Graduate Studies The Vault: Electronic Theses and Dissertations 2014-09-30 Ten Principles of Soviet Operational Art: Red Army Operations in Theory and Practice, 1936-1942 Brisson, Kevin Brisson, K. (2014). Ten Principles of Soviet Operational Art: Red Army Operations in Theory and Practice, 1936-1942 (Unpublished master's thesis). University of Calgary, Calgary, AB. doi:10.11575/PRISM/27996 http://hdl.handle.net/11023/1872 master thesis University of Calgary graduate students retain copyright ownership and moral rights for their thesis. You may use this material in any way that is permitted by the Copyright Act or through licensing that has been assigned to the document. For uses that are not allowable under copyright legislation or licensing, you are required to seek permission. Downloaded from PRISM: https://prism.ucalgary.ca UNIVERSITY OF CALGARY Ten Principles of Soviet Operational Art: Red Army Operations in Theory and Practice, 1936-1942 by Kevin M. Brisson A THESIS SUBMITTED TO THE FACULTY OF GRADUATE STUDIES IN PARTIAL FULFILMENT OF THE REQUREMENTS FOR THE DEGREE OF MASTER OF MILITARY AND STRATEGIC STUDIES CENTRE FOR MILITARY AND STRATEGIC STUDIES CALGARY, ALBERTA SEPTEMBER, 2014 ©Kevin M. Brisson 2014 2 Abstract Over the course of the Great Patriotic War, fought from 22 June, 1941 to 9 May, 1945, there was a dramatic transformation in the way the Red Army conducted battle. From an army on the cusp of annihilation to one that quickly recovered to vanquish the invading forces of Nazi Germany, this resurgence can be traced in part to its mastery of operational art.
  • Chertok Front Matter

    Chertok Front Matter

    Chertok ch1 12/21/04 11:27 AM Page 1 Chapter 1 Introduction: A Debt to My Generation On 1 March 2002, I turned ninety. On that occasion, many people not only congratulated me and wished me health and prosperity, but also insisted that I continue my literary work on the history of rocket-space science and technology.1 I was eighty years old when I had the audacity to think that I possessed not only waning engineering capabilities, but also literary skills sufficient to tell about “the times and about myself.” I began to work in this field in the hope that Fate’s goodwill would allow my idea to be realized. Due to my literary inexperience, I assumed that memoirs on the establishment and development of aviation and, subsequently, rocket-space technology and the people who created it could be limited to a single book of no more than five hundred pages. However, it turns out that when one is producing a literary work aspiring to historical authenticity,one’s plans for the size and the deadlines fall through, just as rocket-space systems aspiring to the highest degree of reliability exceed their budgets and fail to meet their deadlines. And the expenses grow, proportional to the failure to meet deadlines and the increase in reliability. Instead of the original idea of a single book, my memoirs and musings took up four volumes, and together with the publishing house I spent six years instead of the planned two! Only the fact that the literary work was a success, which neither the publishing house nor I expected, validated it.
  • I from KAMCHATKA to GEORGIA the BLUE BLOUSE MOVEMENT

    I from KAMCHATKA to GEORGIA the BLUE BLOUSE MOVEMENT

    FROM KAMCHATKA TO GEORGIA THE BLUE BLOUSE MOVEMENT AND EARLY SOVIET SPATIAL PRACTICE by Robert F. Crane B.A., Georgia State University, 2001 M.A., University of Pittsburgh, 2005 Submitted to the Graduate Faculty of The Dietrich School of Arts and Sciences in partial fulfillment of the requirements for the degree of Doctor of Philosophy University of Pittsburgh 2013 i UNIVERSITY OF PITTSBURGH DEITRICH SCHOOL OF ARTS AND SCIENCES This dissertation was presented by Robert F. Crane It was defended on March 27, 2013 and approved by Atillio Favorini, PhD, Professor, Theatre Arts Kathleen George, PhD, Professor, Theatre Arts Vladimir Padunov, PhD, Professor, Slavic Languages and Literature Dissertation Advisor: Bruce McConachie, PhD, Professor, Theatre Arts ii Copyright © by Robert Crane 2013 iii FROM KAMCHATKA TO GEORGIA THE BLUE BLOUSE MOVEMENT AND EARLY SOVIET SPATIAL PRACTICE Robert Crane, PhD University of Pittsburgh, 2013 The Blue Blouse movement (1923-1933) organized thousands of workers into do-it-yourself variety theatre troupes performing “living newspapers” that consisted of topical sketches, songs, and dances at workers’ clubs across the Soviet Union. At its peak the group claimed more than 7,000 troupes and 100,000 members. At the same time that the movement was active, the Soviet state and its citizens were engaged in the massive project of building a new society reflecting the aims of the Revolution. As Vladimir Paperny has argued, part of this new society was a new spatial organization, one that stressed the horizontal over the