A Review of the Biology of Cerataphidini (Hemiptera, Aphididae, Hormaphidinae), Focusing Mainly on Their Life Cycles, Gall Formation, and Soldiers

Total Page:16

File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

A Review of the Biology of Cerataphidini (Hemiptera, Aphididae, Hormaphidinae), Focusing Mainly on Their Life Cycles, Gall Formation, and Soldiers Hindawi Publishing Corporation Psyche Volume 2010, Article ID 380351, 34 pages doi:10.1155/2010/380351 Review Article A Review of the Biology of Cerataphidini (Hemiptera, Aphididae, Hormaphidinae), Focusing Mainly on Their Life Cycles, Gall Formation, and Soldiers Shigeyuki Aoki1 and Utako Kurosu2 1 Faculty of Economics, Rissho University, Osaki 4-2-16, Tokyo 141-8602, Japan 2 Faculty of Economics, Chuo University, 742-1 Higashinakano, Hachioji, Tokyo 192-0393, Japan Correspondence should be addressed to Shigeyuki Aoki, [email protected] Received 22 September 2010; Accepted 8 December 2010 Academic Editor: Ai-Ping Liang Copyright © 2010 S. Aoki and U. Kurosu. This is an open access article distributed under the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited. Species of the aphid tribe Cerataphidini (Hormaphidinae) form galls of various shapes on Styrax trees, their primary host, throughout East and Southeast Asia including tropical rainforests. All known species of the tribe produce second-instar sterile soldiers on the primary host and some also produce first-instar sterile soldiers on the secondary host. Here, we review their complicated life cycles with or without host alternation, the formation process of their remarkable galls (flower-like multiple- cavity galls in particular), and all morphs including soldiers. The life cycles of cerataphidines are basically the same as those of the subfamily Eriosomatinae, but in tropical and subtropical regions their life cycles are not very rigidly tuned to seasonal changes in the climate if any. In addition, cerataphidine galls in these regions last at least several months, or at times even for over one year; thus it often takes longer than one year to complete their life cycles. 1. Introduction kinds in temperate, subtropical, and tropical regions. Second, we focus on how their galls, their flower-like multiple-cavity The tribe Cerataphidini is an aphid group of approximately galls in particular, are formed by the aphids and explain the 90 species [1], whose members produce sterile soldiers [2, 3]. hypothesis that the aphids may exploit the mechanism of Sofarasisknown,allspeciesproducesterilesecond-instar flower formation in the host plant for their gall formation. soldiers in their galls on the primary host, and some species Third, we present a review of aphid morphs that appear in also produce sterile first-instar soldiers in their open colonies the life cycles. In this section, behavioral aspects of soldiers on the secondary host [4–7]. They induce remarkable galls are reviewed and discussed. on trees of the genus Styrax (Styracaceae), which become huge (up to 35 cm across) in some species [8–11]. For these reasons, the group has recently attracted much attention 2. General Features of the Tribe Cerataphidini from researchers both inside and outside aphidology [12– 14]. However, although some good reviews of aphid soldiers 2.1. Taxonomic Position. The tribe Cerataphidini belongs to in general have been published [6, 7, 15], no extensive review the gall-forming subfamily Hormaphidinae. The Horma- of the life cycles of Cerataphidini (nor of their gall formation) phidinae is a sister group of another gall-forming subfamily, has been available to date. Because their life cycles and the the Eriosomatinae (formerly called “Pemphiginae”) [50] process of gall formation are complicated, it can be difficult (but see also [51]), whose life cycles have been studied better for non-aphidologists (and even aphidologists, too) to gain [52–54] because many species are distributed in Europe a thorough understanding of their biology. In this review, and North America. The Hormaphidinae consists of three we first focus on the life cycles and illustrate their various tribes, Cerataphidini, Hormaphidini, and Nipponaphidini, 2 Psyche Table 1: Primary hosts of Cerataphidini. Cerataphidine genus Styrax species Styrax series Astegopteryx S.suberifolius [16],S.benzoides[17],S.benzoin[18, 19] Benzoin S. japonicus [20, 21],S.formosanus[22], S. obassia [23, 24],S. Ceratovacuna Cyrta, Benzoin tonkinensis 1,S.serrulatus2, S. paralleloneurus [25] Pseudoregma S. suberifolius [26, 27],S.benzoides[28], S. paralleloneurus [29] Benzoin S. suberifolius [30],S.?benzoin[31],S.fraserensis[32],S. Ceratoglyphina Benzoin paralleloneurus [31] Chaitoregma Unknown Cerataphis (with Buchnera) S. suberifolius [33],S.subpaniculatus[10] Benzoin, Cyrta Cerataphis (without Buchnera) S. benzoides 3,S.benzoin[34],S.suberifolius[35] Benzoin S. japonicus [36],S.formosanus[37, 38], S. obassia [39], S. tonkinensis Tuberaphis Cyrta [11],S.subpaniculatus[40, 41] Glyphinaphis Unknown 1 The junior author found many galls of Ceratovacuna sp. formed on Styrax tonkinensis at Nangoa, northern Vietnam, on 11 May 1997. 2We examined a gall of Ceratovacuna sp. collected from Styrax serrulatus by P. W. Fritsch at Ithum Khola River (5000 ft alt.), eastern Nepal, in September 1994. 3We found some galls of Cerataphis sp. near brasiliensis on Styrax benzoides in Chiang Mai, northern Thailand, on 3 November 2002. Table 2: Secondary hosts of Cerataphidini. Tuberaphis, and Glyphinaphis.ThegenusAleurodaphis was once placed in this tribe [36, 42], but molecular data did Cerataphidine genus Plants not support this placement [6, 56]. In addition, one species Gramineae (Bambusoidea, grass) [42], of Aleurodaphis was found to induce galls on Stewartia Astegopteryx Zingiberaceae [42], Palmae [42], monadelpha (Theaceae) [57], not on Styrax.Themonotypic Pandanaceae [42], Musaceae [43, 44] genus Doraphis has also been placed in the Cerataphidini Ceratovacuna Gramineae (Bambusoidea, grass) [42] [1, 54], perhaps because the second generation on Populus Gramineae (Bambusoidea, grass) [42], Pseudoregma has a pair of frontal horns. However, its life cycle [52]is Zingiberaceae [42] similar to those of Hamamelistes species (Hormaphidini) Ceratoglyphina Gramineae (Bambusoidea) [42] [58, 59] in that coccidiform first-instar nymphs hibernate on Chaitoregma Gramineae (Bambusoidea) [45] twigs of the host tree, and the genus is unlikely to belong to Gramineae (Bambusoidea) [46], Palmae the Cerataphidini. [42], Pandanaceae [42], Orchidaceae Within the Cerataphidini, the first four genera (Aste- Cerataphis [42], Araceae [42], Strelitziaceae [47], gopteryx, Ceratovacuna, Pseudoregma,andCeratoglyphina) Smilacaceae [48], Moraceae [43], are known to induce peculiar, multiple-cavity galls and, 1 Zingiberaceae together with Chaitoregma whose galls are unknown, consti- Tuberaphis Loranthaceae [42], Santalaceae [49] tute a monophyletic clade [20, 60]. This has been confirmed Glyphinaphis Gramineae (Bambusoidea) [42] by molecular phylogenetic analyses [18, 31, 56, 61]. The 1 We examined specimens (apterous adults and nymphs) of Cerataphis sp. genera Cerataphis and Tuberaphis form single-cavity galls collected from a plant of Zingiberaceae by T. Fukatsu at Genting Highland, as many other gall aphids do. Galls of Glyphinaphis are yet West Malaysia, on 17 November 1995. unknown. So far as is known, all species of Tuberaphis and Glyphinaphis and most (but not all) species of Cerataphis harbor extracellular, eukaryotic symbionts instead of the in addition to a few genera (Aleurodaphis, Doraphis, Proto- prokaryote Buchnera [60]. If the acquisition of the extra- hormaphis, and Tsugaphis) whose taxonomic positions are cellular symbionts happened only once in the lineage, the unclear within the subfamily and which have been tentatively species group with the extracellular symbionts (Tuberaphis, assigned to some of the three tribes. The members within Glyphinaphis, and some Cerataphis) constitutes a mono- each tribe are well unified in the sense that the primary hosts phyletic clade, but the genus Cerataphis, which includes of Hormaphidini, Nipponaphidini, and Cerataphidini are species with extracellular symbionts (e.g., C. brasiliensis, C. confined to a single plant genus, Hamamelis (Hamameli- jamuritsu) and those without them (C. vandermeermohri, C. daceae), Distylium (Hamamelidaceae), and Styrax (Styra- bambusifoliae), is not [33]. Molecular phylogenetic analyses caceae), respectively. (Galls of some nipponaphidines have have not yet definitely settled the issue [18, 31, 56, 61, recently been found on trees of the genera Distyliopsis and 62]. Sycopsis (Hamamelidaceae) in Taiwan [55].) 2.2. Genera within the Cerataphidini. The Cerataphidini 2.3. Geographic Distribution. Cerataphidines are mainly dis- consists of the following eight genera, Astegopteryx, Ceratova- tributed in East and Southeast Asia. They induce galls on cuna, Pseudoregma, Ceratoglyphina, Chaitoregma, Cerataphis, trees of the genus Styrax, their primary host. All known Psyche 3 primary-host generations have been found there. The north- Sasa, etc.) as the secondary host. Palmae (palms) and/or ernmost record is of Tuberaphis styraci on Styrax obassia Zingiberaceae (gingers) are also often used by tropical species in Sapporo (43◦N), Hokkaido, northern Japan [63]. The of the genera Pseudoregma, Astegopteryx, and Cerataphis.The southernmost record is in Java [42, 64]. The westernmost genus Tuberaphis is peculiar in that its secondary hosts are record is in eastern India or Nepal (see footnote 2 of Table 1), confined to mistletoes of the families Santalaceae (Viscum) and the eastern border is approximately the line from Japan [49] and Loranthaceae (Loranthus, Scurrula, Dendrophtho¨e, through Sulawesi [65] to Java. Trees of the genus
Recommended publications
  • 1 1 DNA Barcodes Reveal Deeply Neglected Diversity and Numerous
    Page 1 of 57 1 DNA barcodes reveal deeply neglected diversity and numerous invasions of micromoths in 2 Madagascar 3 4 5 Carlos Lopez-Vaamonde1,2, Lucas Sire2, Bruno Rasmussen2, Rodolphe Rougerie3, 6 Christian Wieser4, Allaoui Ahamadi Allaoui 5, Joël Minet3, Jeremy R. deWaard6, Thibaud 7 Decaëns7, David C. Lees8 8 9 1 INRA, UR633, Zoologie Forestière, F- 45075 Orléans, France. 10 2 Institut de Recherche sur la Biologie de l’Insecte, UMR 7261 CNRS Université de Tours, UFR 11 Sciences et Techniques, Tours, France. 12 3Institut de Systématique Evolution Biodiversité (ISYEB), Muséum national d'Histoire naturelle, 13 CNRS, Sorbonne Université, EPHE, 57 rue Cuvier, CP 50, 75005 Paris, France. 14 4 Landesmuseum für Kärnten, Abteilung Zoologie, Museumgasse 2, 9020 Klagenfurt, Austria 15 5 Department of Entomology, University of Antananarivo, Antananarivo 101, Madagascar 16 6 Centre for Biodiversity Genomics, University of Guelph, 50 Stone Road E., Guelph, ON 17 N1G2W1, Canada 18 7Centre d'Ecologie Fonctionnelle et Evolutive (CEFE UMR 5175, CNRS–Université de Genome Downloaded from www.nrcresearchpress.com by UNIV GUELPH on 10/03/18 19 Montpellier–Université Paul-Valéry Montpellier–EPHE), 1919 Route de Mende, F-34293 20 Montpellier, France. 21 8Department of Life Sciences, Natural History Museum, Cromwell Road, SW7 5BD, UK. 22 23 24 Email for correspondence: [email protected] For personal use only. This Just-IN manuscript is the accepted prior to copy editing and page composition. It may differ from final official version of record. 1 Page 2 of 57 25 26 Abstract 27 Madagascar is a prime evolutionary hotspot globally, but its unique biodiversity is under threat, 28 essentially from anthropogenic disturbance.
    [Show full text]
  • DNA Barcodes Reveal Deeply Neglected Diversity and Numerous Invasions of Micromoths in Madagascar
    Genome DNA barcodes reveal deeply neglected diversity and numerous invasions of micromoths in Madagascar Journal: Genome Manuscript ID gen-2018-0065.R2 Manuscript Type: Article Date Submitted by the 17-Jul-2018 Author: Complete List of Authors: Lopez-Vaamonde, Carlos; Institut National de la Recherche Agronomique (INRA), ; Institut de Recherche sur la Biologie de l’Insecte (IRBI), Sire, Lucas; Institut de Recherche sur la Biologie de l’Insecte Rasmussen,Draft Bruno; Institut de Recherche sur la Biologie de l’Insecte Rougerie, Rodolphe; Institut Systématique, Evolution, Biodiversité (ISYEB), Wieser, Christian; Landesmuseum für Kärnten Ahamadi, Allaoui; University of Antananarivo, Department Entomology Minet, Joël; Institut de Systematique Evolution Biodiversite deWaard, Jeremy; Biodiversity Institute of Ontario, University of Guelph, Decaëns, Thibaud; Centre d'Ecologie Fonctionnelle et Evolutive (CEFE UMR 5175, CNRS–Université de Montpellier–Université Paul-Valéry Montpellier–EPHE), , CEFE UMR 5175 CNRS Lees, David; Natural History Museum London Keyword: Africa, invasive alien species, Lepidoptera, Malaise trap, plant pests Is the invited manuscript for consideration in a Special 7th International Barcode of Life Issue? : https://mc06.manuscriptcentral.com/genome-pubs Page 1 of 57 Genome 1 DNA barcodes reveal deeply neglected diversity and numerous invasions of micromoths in 2 Madagascar 3 4 5 Carlos Lopez-Vaamonde1,2, Lucas Sire2, Bruno Rasmussen2, Rodolphe Rougerie3, 6 Christian Wieser4, Allaoui Ahamadi Allaoui 5, Joël Minet3, Jeremy R. deWaard6, Thibaud 7 Decaëns7, David C. Lees8 8 9 1 INRA, UR633, Zoologie Forestière, F- 45075 Orléans, France. 10 2 Institut de Recherche sur la Biologie de l’Insecte, UMR 7261 CNRS Université de Tours, UFR 11 Sciences et Techniques, Tours, France.
    [Show full text]
  • Classical Biological Control of Arthropods in Australia
    Classical Biological Contents Control of Arthropods Arthropod index in Australia General index List of targets D.F. Waterhouse D.P.A. Sands CSIRo Entomology Australian Centre for International Agricultural Research Canberra 2001 Back Forward Contents Arthropod index General index List of targets The Australian Centre for International Agricultural Research (ACIAR) was established in June 1982 by an Act of the Australian Parliament. Its primary mandate is to help identify agricultural problems in developing countries and to commission collaborative research between Australian and developing country researchers in fields where Australia has special competence. Where trade names are used this constitutes neither endorsement of nor discrimination against any product by the Centre. ACIAR MONOGRAPH SERIES This peer-reviewed series contains the results of original research supported by ACIAR, or material deemed relevant to ACIAR’s research objectives. The series is distributed internationally, with an emphasis on the Third World. © Australian Centre for International Agricultural Research, GPO Box 1571, Canberra ACT 2601, Australia Waterhouse, D.F. and Sands, D.P.A. 2001. Classical biological control of arthropods in Australia. ACIAR Monograph No. 77, 560 pages. ISBN 0 642 45709 3 (print) ISBN 0 642 45710 7 (electronic) Published in association with CSIRO Entomology (Canberra) and CSIRO Publishing (Melbourne) Scientific editing by Dr Mary Webb, Arawang Editorial, Canberra Design and typesetting by ClarusDesign, Canberra Printed by Brown Prior Anderson, Melbourne Cover: An ichneumonid parasitoid Megarhyssa nortoni ovipositing on a larva of sirex wood wasp, Sirex noctilio. Back Forward Contents Arthropod index General index Foreword List of targets WHEN THE CSIR Division of Economic Entomology, now Commonwealth Scientific and Industrial Research Organisation (CSIRO) Entomology, was established in 1928, classical biological control was given as one of its core activities.
    [Show full text]
  • PRA Cerataphis Lataniae
    CSL Pest Risk Analysis for Cerataphis lataniae CSL copyright, 2005 Pest Risk Analysis for Cerataphis lataniae Boisduval STAGE 1: PRA INITIATION 1. What is the name of the pest? Cerataphis lataniae (Boisduval) Hemiptera Aphididae the Latania aphid Synonyms: Ceratovacuna palmae (Baehr) Aphis palmae (Baehr) Boisduvalia lataniae (Boisduval) Note: In the past C. lataniae has been confused with both C. brasiliensis and C. orchidearum (Howard, 2001). As a result it is not always clear which of the older records for host plants and distribution refer to which species. BAYER CODES: CEATLA 2. What is the reason for the PRA? This PRA was initiated following a second interception of this species. Cerataphis lataniae was first intercepted in the UK in 1999 on a consignment of Archontophoenix alexandra and Brahea drandegai, from South Africa. Since then it has been intercepted twice more; on 30/05/02 on Cocos spp. and then again on 13/06/02 on Cocos nucifera. Both the findings in 2002 were at the same botanic garden and there is some suggestion the Coco plants were supplied by the nursery where the first interception was made in 1999. 3. What is the PRA area? As C. lataniae is present within the EU (Germany, Italy, Spain) (See point 11.) this PRA only considers the UK. STAGE 2: PEST RISK ASSESSMENT 4. Does the pest occur in the PRA area or does it arrive regularly as a natural migrant? No. Although Cerataphis lataniae is included on the British checklist this is likely to be an invalid record as there is no evidence to suggest it is established in the UK (R.
    [Show full text]
  • Entomology Research Recommendations
    ENTOMOLOGY RESEARCH FINDINGS/ RECOMMENDATIONS Division of Crop Protection 01. Research Findings of Research based on Sugarcane Woolly Aphid (SWA); Ceratovacuna lanigera (Homoptera: Aphididae) i. Natural enemy spectrum of SWA includes only arthropod predators and six species have been identified (Wanasinghe et al; 2012). - Dipha aphidivora (Lepidoptera: Pyralidae) - Micromus sp. (Neuroptera: Hemorabiidae) - Eupeodes sp. (Diptera: Syrphidae) - Micraspis discolor (Coleoptera: Coccinelidae) - Synonycha sp. (Coleoptera: Coccinelidae) - Micraspis allardi (Coleoptera: Coccinelidae) Reference: - VKASM Wanasinghe, NC Kumarasinghe and KMG Chanchala (2012). Natural Enemies of Sugarcane Woolly Aphid (Ceratovacuna lanigera): A survey in Passara, Sri Lanka. Proceeding of the forth symposium on plantation crop research, pp 163-170 (Annex 01). ii. Variations of population density of the three natural predators of SWA According to the data collected to find out the variations of population density of the three natural predators of SWA (Dipha aphidivora, Micromus sp. and unidentified Syrphid fly larva) from January 2012 to December 2014 indicated that, Dipha aphidivora and Micromus sp. were recorded throughout the sampling period. Peak populations of Dipha aphidivora were recorded in months of December and January in each year. Peak populations of Micromus sp. were recorded during the time periods with low number of Dipha aphidivora and the correlation coefficient value between the population levels of Dipha aphidivora and Micromus sp. is 0.0047. Unidentified Syrphid fly larva was recorded an uneven distribution during the study period (Annual Research Progress, 2014) iii. Relationship of the three natural predators of SWA with some weather parameters The results of the Pearson correlation coefficient values of each three predator with rainfall, temperature and relative humidity (Table 1) have indicated that, there were no significant correlations of each predator with the weather parameters (Annual Research Progress, 2014) (Annex 02).
    [Show full text]
  • Hemiptera, Heteroptera, Miridae, Isometopinae) from Borneo with Remarks on the Distribution of the Tribe
    ZooKeys 941: 71–89 (2020) A peer-reviewed open-access journal doi: 10.3897/zookeys.941.47432 RESEARCH ARTICLE https://zookeys.pensoft.net Launched to accelerate biodiversity research Two new genera and species of the Gigantometopini (Hemiptera, Heteroptera, Miridae, Isometopinae) from Borneo with remarks on the distribution of the tribe Artur Taszakowski1*, Junggon Kim2*, Claas Damken3, Rodzay A. Wahab3, Aleksander Herczek1, Sunghoon Jung2,4 1 Institute of Biology, Biotechnology and Environmental Protection, Faculty of Natural Sciences, University of Silesia in Katowice, Bankowa 9, 40-007 Katowice, Poland 2 Laboratory of Systematic Entomology, Depart- ment of Applied Biology, College of Agriculture and Life Sciences, Chungnam National University, Daejeon, South Korea 3 Institute for Biodiversity and Environmental Research, Universiti Brunei Darussalam, Jalan Universiti, BE1410, Darussalam, Brunei 4 Department of Smart Agriculture Systems, College of Agriculture and Life Sciences, Chungnam National University, Daejeon, South Korea Corresponding author: Artur Taszakowski ([email protected]); Sunghoon Jung ([email protected]) Academic editor: F. Konstantinov | Received 21 October 2019 | Accepted 2 May 2020 | Published 16 June 2020 http://zoobank.org/B3C9A4BA-B098-4D73-A60C-240051C72124 Citation: Taszakowski A, Kim J, Damken C, Wahab RA, Herczek A, Jung S (2020) Two new genera and species of the Gigantometopini (Hemiptera, Heteroptera, Miridae, Isometopinae) from Borneo with remarks on the distribution of the tribe. ZooKeys 941: 71–89. https://doi.org/10.3897/zookeys.941.47432 Abstract Two new genera, each represented by a single new species, Planicapitus luteus Taszakowski, Kim & Her- czek, gen. et sp. nov. and Bruneimetopus simulans Taszakowski, Kim & Herczek, gen. et sp. nov., are described from Borneo.
    [Show full text]
  • Aphids (Hemiptera, Aphididae)
    A peer-reviewed open-access journal BioRisk 4(1): 435–474 (2010) Aphids (Hemiptera, Aphididae). Chapter 9.2 435 doi: 10.3897/biorisk.4.57 RESEARCH ARTICLE BioRisk www.pensoftonline.net/biorisk Aphids (Hemiptera, Aphididae) Chapter 9.2 Armelle Cœur d’acier1, Nicolas Pérez Hidalgo2, Olivera Petrović-Obradović3 1 INRA, UMR CBGP (INRA / IRD / Cirad / Montpellier SupAgro), Campus International de Baillarguet, CS 30016, F-34988 Montferrier-sur-Lez, France 2 Universidad de León, Facultad de Ciencias Biológicas y Ambientales, Universidad de León, 24071 – León, Spain 3 University of Belgrade, Faculty of Agriculture, Nemanjina 6, SER-11000, Belgrade, Serbia Corresponding authors: Armelle Cœur d’acier ([email protected]), Nicolas Pérez Hidalgo (nperh@unile- on.es), Olivera Petrović-Obradović ([email protected]) Academic editor: David Roy | Received 1 March 2010 | Accepted 24 May 2010 | Published 6 July 2010 Citation: Cœur d’acier A (2010) Aphids (Hemiptera, Aphididae). Chapter 9.2. In: Roques A et al. (Eds) Alien terrestrial arthropods of Europe. BioRisk 4(1): 435–474. doi: 10.3897/biorisk.4.57 Abstract Our study aimed at providing a comprehensive list of Aphididae alien to Europe. A total of 98 species originating from other continents have established so far in Europe, to which we add 4 cosmopolitan spe- cies of uncertain origin (cryptogenic). Th e 102 alien species of Aphididae established in Europe belong to 12 diff erent subfamilies, fi ve of them contributing by more than 5 species to the alien fauna. Most alien aphids originate from temperate regions of the world. Th ere was no signifi cant variation in the geographic origin of the alien aphids over time.
    [Show full text]
  • ARTHROPODA Subphylum Hexapoda Protura, Springtails, Diplura, and Insects
    NINE Phylum ARTHROPODA SUBPHYLUM HEXAPODA Protura, springtails, Diplura, and insects ROD P. MACFARLANE, PETER A. MADDISON, IAN G. ANDREW, JOCELYN A. BERRY, PETER M. JOHNS, ROBERT J. B. HOARE, MARIE-CLAUDE LARIVIÈRE, PENELOPE GREENSLADE, ROSA C. HENDERSON, COURTenaY N. SMITHERS, RicarDO L. PALMA, JOHN B. WARD, ROBERT L. C. PILGRIM, DaVID R. TOWNS, IAN McLELLAN, DAVID A. J. TEULON, TERRY R. HITCHINGS, VICTOR F. EASTOP, NICHOLAS A. MARTIN, MURRAY J. FLETCHER, MARLON A. W. STUFKENS, PAMELA J. DALE, Daniel BURCKHARDT, THOMAS R. BUCKLEY, STEVEN A. TREWICK defining feature of the Hexapoda, as the name suggests, is six legs. Also, the body comprises a head, thorax, and abdomen. The number A of abdominal segments varies, however; there are only six in the Collembola (springtails), 9–12 in the Protura, and 10 in the Diplura, whereas in all other hexapods there are strictly 11. Insects are now regarded as comprising only those hexapods with 11 abdominal segments. Whereas crustaceans are the dominant group of arthropods in the sea, hexapods prevail on land, in numbers and biomass. Altogether, the Hexapoda constitutes the most diverse group of animals – the estimated number of described species worldwide is just over 900,000, with the beetles (order Coleoptera) comprising more than a third of these. Today, the Hexapoda is considered to contain four classes – the Insecta, and the Protura, Collembola, and Diplura. The latter three classes were formerly allied with the insect orders Archaeognatha (jumping bristletails) and Thysanura (silverfish) as the insect subclass Apterygota (‘wingless’). The Apterygota is now regarded as an artificial assemblage (Bitsch & Bitsch 2000).
    [Show full text]
  • Dissecting Genome Reduction and Trait Loss in Insect Endosymbionts
    Ann. N.Y. Acad. Sci. ISSN 0077-8923 ANNALS OF THE NEW YORK ACADEMY OF SCIENCES Issue: The Year in Evolutionary Biology REVIEW ARTICLE Dissecting genome reduction and trait loss in insect endosymbionts Amparo Latorre1,2 and Alejandro Manzano-Mar´ın1 1Institut Cavanilles de Biodiversitat I Biologia Evolutiva, Universitat de Valencia, C/Catedratico´ JoseBeltr´ an,´ Paterna, Valencia, Spain. 2Area´ de Genomica´ y Salud de la Fundacion´ para el fomento de la Investigacion´ Sanitaria y Biomedicadela´ Comunitat Valenciana (FISABIO)-Salud Publica,´ Valencia,` Spain Address for correspondence: Amparo Latorre, Institut Cavanilles de Biodiversitat i Biologia Evolutiva, Universitat de Valencia, C/Catedratico´ JoseBeltr´ an´ 2, 46071 Paterna, Valencia, Spain. [email protected] Symbiosis has played a major role in eukaryotic evolution beyond the origin of the eukaryotic cell. Thus, organisms across the tree of life are associated with diverse microbial partners, conferring to the host new adaptive traits that enable it to explore new niches. This is the case for insects thriving on unbalanced diets, which harbor mutualistic intracellular microorganisms, mostly bacteria that supply them with the required nutrients. As a consequence of the lifestyle change, from free-living to host-associated mutualist, a bacterium undergoes many structural and metabolic changes, of which genome shrinkage is the most dramatic. The trend toward genome size reduction in endosymbiotic bacteria is associated with large-scale gene loss, reflecting the lack of an effective selection mechanism to maintain genes that are rendered superfluous by the constant and rich environment provided by the host. This genome- reduction syndrome is so strong that it has generated the smallest bacterial genomes found to date, whose gene contents are so limited that their status as cellular entities is questionable.
    [Show full text]
  • Butterfly Biodiversity in Singapore with Particular Reference to the Central
    Proceedings of the Nature Reserves Survey Seminar. 70re 49(2) (1997) Gardens' Bulletin Singapore 49 (1997) 273-296. ~ laysia and Butterfly Biodiversity in Singapore with Particular :ingapore. Reference to the Central Catchment Nature Reserve discovery, 1 2 ~y Bulletin. S.K. KHEW AND STEVEN S.H. NE0 1103, Tai Keng Gardens, Singapore 535384 re. In: L.M. 2Blk 16, Simei Street 1, #05-13, Melville Park, Singapore 529942 )f Zoology, Abstract Chin, R.T. A total of 381 butterfly species have now been recorded in Singapore of which 18 are new City: Bukit records since 1990. Of this total, 236 species (62%) were recorded during the present JOre. Suppl. survey. A U except 8 (3%) of these occur within the Nature Reserves and 148 (63%) were recorded only within the Nature Reserves. A total of 74 species (31%) within the Reserves were considered very rare. e Nee Soon ion: Marine Introduction l impact of The study of butterflies by amateurs is not new, and indeed, it is through onservation. the observations of these dedicated individuals that much important data have been accumulated over the years. The information on butterfly biodiversity in Singapore is, at most, sketchy. Most of the documentation ater prawn, of the species occurred done during the post-war years until the late 1960s. nidae) from From our literature research, two references stand out: W.A. Fleming's )gy. 43: 299- Butterflies of West Malaysia and Singapore (1991) and Steven Corbet and Maurice Pendlebury's Butterfli es of the Malay Peninsula (1992). Although the latest editions of the two reference books were published in the early ~amalph eops 1990s, most of the updates referred only to the Peninsular Malaysia.
    [Show full text]
  • Monmouthshire Moth & Butterfly Group
    MONMOUTHSHIRE MOTH & BUTTERFLY GROUP NEWSLETTER No 86 August 2012. A monthly newsletter covering Gwent and Monmouthshire Vice County 35 Editor: Martin Anthoney Small Ranunculus (Hecatera dysodea ) Update Up to 1900 this small, pretty moth used to be common in Britain, mainly in eastern and southern counties. It then suffered a catastrophic decline, and by 1912 it had disappeared from most of its range. The last record was 1941 and it was assumed to be extinct in Britain. The Small Ranunculus reappeared in Britain on 26th June 1997 in Kent. In 1998 it was recorded in areas around the Thames Estuary which was formerly one of its strongholds, and on 14th July 1999 Roger James caught one in his light trap at Newport, well away from its former range. The next six years produced eleven further adult specimens to light in Roger’s garden, and in 2003 Kevin Dupé and Roger confirmed breeding when eggs and larvae were found on prickly lettuce at the Blaina Wharf site alongside the River Usk. Since then, records have been made from many sites along the Usk corridor in Newport and out as far as St Mellons in the west and Goldcliff in the east. In August 2012, Kevin Dupé found larvae in the Crindau area of Newport and also close to the footbridge over the River Usk near Rodney Parade. On 28th August, Roger James and I were recording butterflies when we found 20 Small Ranunculus larvae adjacent to Caldicot Railway Station and the following day a further one at Chepstow (Newhouse Farm Industrial Estate), next to the first Severn bridge.
    [Show full text]
  • White Plant Shoots, Wax-Producing Insects and Other White Structures Made by Arthropods: a Mimicry Complex?
    EUROPEAN JOURNAL OF ENTOMOLOGYENTOMOLOGY ISSN (online): 1802-8829 Eur. J. Entomol. 114: 343–349, 2017 http://www.eje.cz doi: 10.14411/eje.2017.043 POINT OF VIEW White plant shoots, wax-producing insects and other white structures made by arthropods: A mimicry complex? KAZUO YAMAZAKI Osaka Institute of Public Health, 8-34 Tojo-cho, Tennoji, Osaka 543-0026, Japan; e-mail: [email protected]. jp Key words. Plant mimicry, anti-herbivore defence, cocoon, entomopathogenic fungus, spider egg sac, spittlebug froth, trichome, wax Abstract. Many insects masquerade as parts of plants, such as bark or leaves, or mimic poisonous organisms in order to defend themselves against predators. However, recent studies indicate that plants may mimic insects and other arthropods to deter herbi- vores. Here, I report visually similar white structures of plants and arthropods in Japan and suggest they are part of a mimicry com- plex. Young shoots covered with white trichomes or waxy substances may mimic wax-producing insects, such as woolly aphids, coccids and caterpillars, potentially resulting in reduced herbivory. Since wax-producing insects would reduce plant quality and quantity, be distasteful and attract natural enemies, herbivorous insects and mammals may avoid such white shoots. Furthermore, fungus-infected insects, gregarious braconid cocoons, spider egg sacs and froth made by froghopper nymphs or blasticotomid sawfl y larvae are also conspicuously white and impose risks for herbivorous insects. Thus, these white structures may be mimicry models for white shoots and are likely to be part of a defensive mimicry complex. Although this study focuses on defence against herbivores, there are simultaneous physiological roles for white colouration that will not be discussed in depth here.
    [Show full text]