Research Report of the University of Bradford on Non-Lethal Weapons, Mars 2006
Total Page：16
File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb
Load more
Recommended publications
-
Non-Lethal Technologies: an Overview
TABLE OF CONTENTS Editor's Note Kerstin VIGNARD................................................................................................................ 1 Special Comment Robin M. COUPLAND ....................................................................................................... 3 Science, technology and the CBW regimes Science, technology and the CBW control regimes Alexander KELLE ................................................................................................................. 7 The malign misuse of neuroscience Malcolm DANDO............................................................................................................... 17 Assault on the immune system Kathryn NIXDORFF ............................................................................................................. 25 Non-lethal technologies—an overview Nick LEWER and Neil DAVISON ......................................................................................... 37 Biological weapons and the life sciences: the potential for professional codes Brian RAPPERT .................................................................................................................... 53 Open Forum Lessons from the implementation of the anti-personnel Mine Ban Convention Ambassador Stephan NELLEN ............................................................................................. 63 UNIDIR Focus ..................................................................................................... 69 iii EDITOR'S NOTE The -
GURPS4E Ultra-Tech.Qxp
Written by DAVID PULVER, with KENNETH PETERS Additional Material by WILLIAM BARTON, LOYD BLANKENSHIP, and STEVE JACKSON Edited by CHRISTOPHER AYLOTT, STEVE JACKSON, SEAN PUNCH, WIL UPCHURCH, and NIKOLA VRTIS Cover Art by SIMON LISSAMAN, DREW MORROW, BOB STEVLIC, and JOHN ZELEZNIK Illustrated by JESSE DEGRAFF, IGOR FIORENTINI, SIMON LISSAMAN, DREW MORROW, E. JON NETHERLAND, AARON PANAGOS, CHRISTOPHER SHY, BOB STEVLIC, and JOHN ZELEZNIK Stock # 31-0104 Version 1.0 – May 22, 2007 STEVE JACKSON GAMES CONTENTS INTRODUCTION . 4 Adjusting for SM . 16 PERSONAL GEAR AND About the Authors . 4 EQUIPMENT STATISTICS . 16 CONSUMER GOODS . 38 About GURPS . 4 Personal Items . 38 2. CORE TECHNOLOGIES . 18 Clothing . 38 1. ULTRA-TECHNOLOGY . 5 POWER . 18 Entertainment . 40 AGES OF TECHNOLOGY . 6 Power Cells. 18 Recreation and TL9 – The Microtech Age . 6 Generators . 20 Personal Robots. 41 TL10 – The Robotic Age . 6 Energy Collection . 20 TL11 – The Age of Beamed and 3. COMMUNICATIONS, SENSORS, Exotic Matter . 7 Broadcast Power . 21 AND MEDIA . 42 TL12 – The Age of Miracles . 7 Civilization and Power . 21 COMMUNICATION AND INTERFACE . 42 Even Higher TLs. 7 COMPUTERS . 21 Communicators. 43 TECH LEVEL . 8 Hardware . 21 Encryption . 46 Technological Progression . 8 AI: Hardware or Software? . 23 Receive-Only or TECHNOLOGY PATHS . 8 Software . 24 Transmit-Only Comms. 46 Conservative Hard SF. 9 Using a HUD . 24 Translators . 47 Radical Hard SF . 9 Ubiquitous Computing . 25 Neural Interfaces. 48 CyberPunk . 9 ROBOTS AND TOTAL CYBORGS . 26 Networks . 49 Nanotech Revolution . 9 Digital Intelligences. 26 Mail and Freight . 50 Unlimited Technology. 9 Drones . 26 MEDIA AND EDUCATION . 51 Emergent Superscience . -
Writer Chris Tavares Dias Cover Design & Layout Joshua Raynack
Writer Chris Tavares Dias Cover Design & Layout Joshua Raynack Cover Illustration Nick Greenwood Editor Christopher Stilson Interior Illustrations Nick Greenwood, Wayne Miller Logo Designs Nick Greenwood Military Advisor Geoffrey Lamb Playtesters Aaron Hamilton, Aaron Hengst, Ahmed Alex Nasla, Alex Hofer, Alex Tendy, Andrew Cermak, Andrew Howes, Andrew Impellezari, Andrew Young, Angela Berry, Bill Yon, Brad Scoble, Brandon Allen, Brian Barngrover, Cameron Lauder, Charla Anderson, Charles Mitchell, Chris Baker, Chris Brown, Chris Brown, Chris Clouser, Chris Dias, Chris Oveson, Chris Tyler, Chris Young, Christopher Baker, Christopher Hunt, Christopher Stilson, Chuck McGinnis, Clarence Sterling, Daryl Anderson, Dave Lee, Dave Painter, David Baker, David Guyll, David Henderson, David Hoyer, Denny Glau, Derek Mitchem, Dirk Lancer, Douglas Warshowski, Edd McGinnis, Edward Martin, Elizabeth Bonsell, Eric Bonsell, Eric Braun, Fernando Barrocal, Gabriel Clouser, Gary Bratzel, Geoffrey Lamb, Glen Gratton, Greg Brown, Ian Hunt, Igor Diamantino, Jason Brown, Jeff Berndt, Jennifer Hoyer, Jesse Fuhrman, Jessica Painter, Jewel Sandeen, Joe Hinke, John Keyes, Johnny Riess, Jon Ohman, Jordi Franch, Jordi Martin Castany, Jordi SalaIbars, Joseph Toral, Joshua Hamilton, Justin Mathena, Khalea Allen, Kiara Sandeen, Kyle Smith, Liz Strom-Deason, Lynette Terrill, Marc Franch Ventura, Marc Sonnenberger, Marcelo Dior, Marina Ursa, Mark Whiting, Mathew Wilson, Melissa Oveson, Mica Fetz, Michael Andaluz, Michael Murphy, Mike Fitch, Mike McMullen, Miles Orion Kelley, -
Mapping the Aesthetical-Political Sonic, Master Thesis, © March 2017 Supervisor: Sommerer, Christa, Univ.-Prof
Universität für Künstlerische und Industrielle Gestaltung Linz Institut für Medien Interface Culture SOUNDSREVOLTING:MAPPINGTHE AESTHETICAL-POLITICALSONIC oliver lehner Master Thesis MA supervisor: Sommerer, Christa, Univ.-Prof. Dr. date of approbation: March 2017 signature (supervisor): Linz, 2017 Oliver Lehner: Sounds Revolting: Mapping the Aesthetical-Political Sonic, Master Thesis, © March 2017 supervisor: Sommerer, Christa, Univ.-Prof. Dr. location: Linz ABSTRACT I demand change. As a creator of sound art, I wanted to know what it can do. I tried to find out about the potential field in the overlap between a political aesthetic and a political sonic, between an artis- tic activism and sonic war machines. My point of entry was Steve Goodman’s Sonic Warfare. From there, trajectories unfolded through sonic architectures into an activist philosophy in interactive art. Sonic weapon technology and contemporary sound art practices define a frame for my works. In the end, I could only hint at sonic agents for change. iii CONTENTS i thesis 1 1 introduction 3 1.1 Why sound matters (to me) . 3 1.2 Listening for “New Weapons” . 4 1.3 Sounds of War . 5 1.4 Aesthetics and Politics . 6 2 acoustic weapons 11 2.1 On “Non-lethal” Weapons (NLW) . 11 2.2 A brief history of weaponized sound . 14 2.3 Sonic Battleground Europe . 19 2.4 Civil Sonic Weapons and Counter Measures . 20 3 the art of (sonic) war 23 3.1 Advanced Hyperstition: Goodman’s work after Sonic Warfare . 23 3.2 Artistic Sonic War Machines . 26 3.3 Ultrasound Art and Micropolitics of Frequency . 31 4 the search for sound artivism 37 4.1 Art and Activism . -
Orbital ATK - Aerospace Structures Overview
Orbital ATK - Aerospace Structures Overview Revision update May 2017 O12 – Orbital ATK ASD Overview Lite Version 2017 – Approved for Public Release 0 Orbital ATK Overview • Global Aerospace and Defense Systems Company Established by Merger of Orbital and Alliant Techsystems in Early 2015 • Northrop Grumman announced in September 2017 that they have positioned themselves to acquire Orbital ATK and make them a fourth sector of their business. Orbital ATK will remain a merchant supplier for composite components for the aerospace industry • Leading Developer and Manufacturer of Reliable, Innovative and Affordable Products for Government and Commercial Customers Aerospace Structures, Launch Vehicles and Rocket Propulsion Systems Tactical Missile Products, Armament Systems and Ammunition Satellites, Advanced Systems, Space Components and Technical Services • More Than 12,500 Employees, Including About 4,000 Engineers and Scientists • Targeting About $4.6 Billion in Revenue and Up to $6.00 in Earnings per Share in 2017 • Over $14 Billion in Contract Backlog With Good Near-Term Growth Prospects O12 – Orbital ATK ASD Overview Lite Version 2017 – Approved for Public Release 1 Three Operating Groups and 12 Product Lanes Flight Systems Space Systems Defense Systems • Space Launch Vehicles • Satellites Systems • Tactical Missile Systems • Rocket Propulsion Systems • Advanced Programs • Defense Electronic Systems • Aerospace Structures • Spacecraft Components • Armament Systems • Space Technical Services • Ammunition and Energetics 2017 Corporate -
Acoustic Weapons Aim to Use the Propagation of Sound – a Variation in Pressure That Travels Through a Fluid Medium (Such As Air) to Affect a Target
Acoustic (or sonic) weapons are under research and development DISCUSSION PAPER| NOV 2018 in a few countries and have been the subject of interest and much speculation for several decades.1 Such devices have repeatedly captured the interest of the press, most recently when it was reported in 2016 that several staff members at the American em- bassy in Cuba were allegedly ‘subjected to an “acoustic attack” using sonic devices’ that caused serious health problems.2 Neurol- ogists and engineers have challenged this claim.3 Acoustic weapons aim to use the propagation of sound – a variation in pressure that travels through a fluid medium (such as air) to affect a target. Most of the acoustic weapons that have been speculated Acoustic Weapons upon are based on either ultrasound (above 20 kilohertz, kHz), low frequencies (below 100 hertz, Hz) or infrasound (below 20 Hz) deployed at high levels.4 The human range of hearing is commonly given as between 20 Hz and 20 kHz. In reality, the upper hear- ing-threshold frequency decreases significantly with age, whereas sounds with lower frequencies can be heard and otherwise perceived if the level is high enough.5 Discussion paper for the Convention on Certain Conventional Weapons (CCW) Although a few acoustic devices exist today that could be used as weapons, and sound is implicated in the use of force in the military and law enforcement domains in various ways, the potential for wea- Geneva, November 2018* ponization of acoustic devices has likely been overstated.6 Recent scientific analyses have debunked myths and disproven earlier claims Article 36 is a UK-based not-for-profit organisation working to promote public about the effects of acoustic devices on humans and have drawn scrutiny over the development and use of weapons. -
Aviation and Aerospace
AVIATION-AEROSPACE MAJOR AEROSPACE COMPANIES EMPLOYMENT SECTORS INDUSTRY CLUSTERS AVG. COMPANY LINE OF BUSINESS INDUSTRY ESTABLISHMENTS EMPLOYMENT AVIATION A.E. Petsche Company Aerospace electrical equipment DFW’S 35E SEARCH, DETECTION & 16 3,388 AND AEROSPACE NAVIGATION Air Methods Corporation Air transportation, nonscheduled 35W Airbus Helicopters, Inc Helicopter parts The Dallas–Fort Worth area is among ECONOMIC AEROSPACE PRODUCT & 106 29,566 PARTS MFG. Alliant Techsystems, Inc Missile electronics, space propulsion units the nation’s top regions for aviation 121 American Airlines / AMR Corporation Air transportation and aerospace activity. The region is AIR TRANSPORTATION 131 30,244 ENGINE American Eurocopter LLC Aircraft parts and equipment headquarters to two mainline airlines, SUPPORT ACTIVITIES FOR 240 10,891 American Airlines Inc. and Southwest AIR TRANSPORTATION Applied Aerodynamics, Inc Maintenance & repair services | 35E Associated Air Center, LP Aircraft servicing and repairing Airlines Co., and regional jet operator35W (and SATELLITE 17 122 American Airlines partner) American Eagle 121 TELECOMMUNICATIONS Aviall Inc Parts distribution and maintenance AEROSPACE AND AVIATION Inc. Southwest also operates a major FLIGHT TRAINING 45 1,605 BAE Systems Controls Inc Aircraft parts and equipment maintenance base here, creating a strong TOTAL 190 555 75,816 Bell Helicopter Textron Inc Helicopters, Aircraft parts and equipment foundation of aviation employment. 190 Boeing Company Commerical and military aircraft Aerospace is a key source -
"Non-Lethal" Weapons,3 and Occasional Paper No
Bradford Non-Lethal Weapons Research Project (BNLWRP). Occasional Paper No. 3. The Contemporary Development of ¿Non-Lethal¿ Weapons. Item Type Occasional paper Authors Davison, N. Citation Davison, N. (2007). Bradford Non-Lethal Weapons Research Project (BNLWRP). Occasional Paper No. 3. The Contemporary Development of ¿Non-Lethal¿ Weapons. Bradford: University of Bradford, Department of Peace Studies. Publisher University of Bradford Rights © 2007 University of Bradford. Reproduced in accordance with the publisher's self-archiving policy. Download date 06/10/2021 11:53:34 Link to Item http://hdl.handle.net/10454/3996 Bradford Non-Lethal Weapons Research Project (BNLWRP) Department of Peace Studies University of Bradford, UK Occasional Paper No. 3 The Contemporary Development of “Non-Lethal” Weapons. Neil Davison May 2007 Occasional Paper No. 3, May 2007. The Contemporary Development of “Non-Lethal” Weapons. 1. Introduction This is the third in a series of Occasional Papers published by the Bradford Non-Lethal Weapons Research Project. It addresses the contemporary development of anti-personnel “non-lethal”1 weapons, covering the period from 2000 to 2006 inclusive2 and focusing on the research and development programmes of the US Department of Defense and Department of Justice. Following Occasional Paper No. 1, The Early History of "Non-Lethal" Weapons,3 and Occasional Paper No. 2, The Development of “Non-Lethal” Weapons During the 1990’s,4 this paper completes our analysis of the overall development of “non-lethal” weapons from their inception up to the present day. 2. Police Developments During 2000 the US National Institute of Justice had 17 ongoing projects on “non-lethal” weapons that had been funded during the mid to late 1990’s. -
Alliant Techsystems
performance is especially important to our law enforcement customers as they rely on our products to protect and serve the public. ATK generally faces competition from a number of competitors in each business area, although no single competitor competes along all of ATK’s segments. ATK’s principal competitors in each of its segments are as follows: ATK Armament Systems: General Dynamics Ordnance and Tactical Systems, Inc., a subsidiary of General Dynamics Corporation; BAE Systems; Winchester Ammunition of Olin Corporation; Remington Arms; and various smaller manufacturers and importers, including Hornady, Black Hills Ammunition, Wolf, Rio Ammunition, Fiocchi Ammunition, and Selliers & Belloitt. ATK Mission Systems: Aerojet-General Corporation, a subsidiary of GenCorp Inc.; General Dynamics Corporation; Lockheed Martin Corporation; Raytheon Company; Textron Inc.; Pratt & Whitney Space and Missile Propulsion of United Technologies Corporation; The Boeing Company; L-3 Communications Corporation; Northrop Grumman Corporation; GKN plc; AAR Corp.; Vought Aircraft Industries, Inc.; Goodrich Corporation; Applied Aerospace Structures Corporation; Science Applications International Corporation (SAIC); Ball Aerospace & Technologies Corporation, a subsidiary of Ball Corporation; and Georgia University of Technology. ATK Space Systems: Aerojet-General Corporation, a subsidiary of GenCorp Inc.; Kilgore Flares Company, LLC, a subsidiary of Chemring Group, PLC; Pratt & Whitney Rocketdyne, Inc., a subsidiary of United Technologies Corporation; Orbital Sciences Corporation; Ball Aerospace & Technologies Corporation; General Dynamics-Integrated Space Systems; Sierra Nevada Corporation; AASC; and Keystone & ARDE of United Technologies. Research and Development We conduct extensive research and development (‘‘R&D’’) activities. Company-funded R&D is primarily for the development of next-generation technology. Customer-funded R&D is comprised primarily of activities we conduct under contracts with the U.S. -
Alliant Techsystems
In the United States Court of Federal Claims No. 01-20C (Filed January 4, 2007) * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * ALLIANT TECHSYSTEMS INC., * ATK AEROSPACE GROUP, *Summary judgment; settlement agreement; *contract interpretation; plain meaning; reasonable interpretation; unambiguous terms; Plaintiff, * extrinsic evidence; post-settlement *consideration of claims; estoppel. v . * * THE UNITED STATES, * * Defendant. * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * Thomas A. Lemmer, McKenna Long & Aldridge LLP, Denver, Colorado, for plaintiff. Steven M. Masiello, McKenna Long & Aldridge LLP, Denver, Colorado, and Michael L. Bell, Alliant Techsystems Inc., Salt Lake City, Utah, of counsel. C. Coleman Bird, Commercial Litigation Branch, Civil Division, Department of Justice, with whom were Peter D. Keisler, Assistant Attorney General, and David M. Cohen, Director, all of Washington, D.C., for defendant. Major Kevin Robitaille, Department of the Army, Arlington, Virginia, of counsel. OPINION AND ORDER WOLSKI, Judge. The plaintiff, Alliant Techsystems Inc., ATK Aerospace Group, successor-in-interest to Thiokol Propulsion (“ATK/Thiokol”), filed this suit seeking to recover $2,722,709 of post- retirement benefit costs. These costs were incurred during fiscal years 1996 and 1997 and were due to benefits earned by the employees of ATK/Thiokol during its operation of government- owned, contractor-operated facilities. The government argues that these costs were included among those released in a 1997 settlement agreement between the parties that ended two prior suits in this Court, and ATK/Thiokol counters that this settlement excluded these particular costs. Each party has moved for summary judgment, based on their respective interpretations of the settlement agreement. The Court has concluded that the settlement agreement released the government from liability for these costs, and, as explained below, GRANTS the government’s motion for summary judgment and DENIES ATK/Thiokol’s cross-motion for partial summary judgment. -
2.0 FACILITY DESCRIPTION the Bacchus Facility Is Located on the West Side of the Salt Lake Valley in West Valley City, Utah and Unincorporated Salt Lake County
ATK Launch Systems Part B Operation Plan Bacchus - Plant 1 Facility Description UTD001705029 Modified June 2019 2.0 FACILITY DESCRIPTION The Bacchus facility is located on the west side of the Salt Lake valley in West Valley City, Utah and unincorporated Salt Lake County. The facility includes over 400 buildings that are used to produce and prepare propellant ingredients, manufacture solid propellants and produce solid propellant rocket motors. 2.1.1 General Description of the Bacchus Facility The Bacchus facility includes the following subparts: Plant 1 (or Bacchus East); the Naval Industrial Reserve Ordnance Plant (NIROP); Bacchus West; and a number of off-site groundwater sampling wells. In order to provide a complete description of the processes that generate hazardous waste at Bacchus, the treatment and storage facilities located on NIROP will be described in this application along with the other Bacchus facilities. However, the permit application information for facilities located on NIROP will be submitted as a separate application. The facilities that comprise Bacchus are owned or leased, and operated by ATK Launch Systems Inc., a wholly owned subsidiary of Northrop Grumman Innovation Systems, Inc. The areas covered by this application are shown on Figure 2-1.1. The NIROP facility is owned by the Navy and is operated by ATK Launch Systems Inc. as an integral part of the facility. Plant 1 and a portion of the Bacchus West facilities are owned by ATK Launch Systems Inc. Most of the Bacchus West property is owned by and leased from the Kennecott Corporation. The facility occupies about 10,000 acres within West Valley City, Utah and unincorporated Salt Lake County. -
Online Version*
ONLINE VERSION* SAN DIEGO CONVENTION CENTER QUICK GUIDE HILTON MANCHESTER OMNI SAN DIEGO SAN DIEGO GRAND HYATT SAN DIEGO CENTRAL BAYFRONT SAN DIEGO HOTEL LIBRARY MARRIOTT MARQUIS SAN DIEGO MARINA COMIC-CON® INTERNATIONAL 2017 JULY 20–23 • PREVIEW NIGHT: JULY 19 COMPLETE SCHEDULE GRIDS • EXHIBIT HALL MAP • EXHIBITOR LISTS MAPS OF THE CONVENTION CENTER/PROGRAM & EVENT VENUES/SHUTTLE ROUTES & HOTELS/DOWNTOWN RESTAURANTS *ONLINE VERSION WILL NOT BE UPDATED BEFORE COMIC-CON • DOWNLOAD THE OFFICIAL COMIC-CON APP FOR UPDATES COMIC-CON INTERNATIONAL 2017 QUICK GUIDE WELCOME! to the 2017 edition of the Comic-Con International Quick Guide, your guide to the show through maps and the schedule-at-a-glance programming grids! Please remember that the Quick Guide and the Events Guide are once again TWO SEPARATE PUBLICATIONS! For an in-depth look at Comic- Con, including all the program descriptions, pick up a copy of the Events Guide in the Sails Pavilion upstairs at the San Diego Convention Center . and don’t forget to pick up your copy of the Souvenir Book, too! It’s our biggest book ever, chock full of great articles and art! CONTENTS 4 Comic-Con 2017 Programming & Event Locations COMIC-CON 5 RFID Badges • Morning Lines for Exclusives/Booth Signing Wristbands 2017 HOURS 6-7 Convention Center Upper Level Map • Mezzanine Map WEDNESDAY 8 Hall H/Ballroom 20 Maps Preview Night: 9 Hall H Wristband Info • Hall H Next Day Line Map 6:00 to 9:00 PM 10 Rooms 2-11 Line Map THURSDAY, FRIDAY, 11 Hotels and Shuttle Stops Map SATURDAY: 9:30 AM to 7:00 PM* 14-15 Marriott Marquis San Diego Marina Program Information and Maps SUNDAY: 16-17 Hilton San Diego Bayfront Program Information and Maps 9:30 AM to 5:00 PM 18-19 Manchester Grand Hyatt Program Information and Maps *Programming continues into the evening hours on 20 Horton Grand Theatre Program Information and Map Thursday through 21 San Diego Central Library Program Information and Map Saturday nights.